Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:08:16.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part One - What Is a Language?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2022

Edited by
Adam Ledgeway  and
Martin Maiden
Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics , pp. 95 - 180
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Adams, J. (2013). Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchi, E. and Schweickard, W. (2011). ‘Ce qui oppose vraiment deux conceptions de l’étymologie romane. Réponse à Alberto Vàrvaro et contribution à un débat méthodologique en cours’, Revue de Linguistique Romane 75: 628–35.Google Scholar
Corominas, J. and Pascual, J. A. (1991–97). Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Dardel, R. (1965). Recherches sur le genre roman des substantifs de la troisième déclinaison. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Drinka, B. (2017). Language Contact in Europe. The Periphrastic Perfect through History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, S. N. (2016). ‘Do Romanists need to reconstruct Proto-Romance? The case of the Dictionnaire Étymologique Roman (DÉRom) project’, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 132: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elcock, W. D. (1960). The Romance Languages. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. (1974). Proto-Romance Phonology. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Haverling, G. (2016). ‘On the use of habeo and the perfect participle in earlier and later Latin’. In Adams, J. and Vincent, N. (eds), Early and Late Latin: Continuity or Change? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 180–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. (2018). [Review of Buchi and Schweickard (eds) (2014) and (2016)], Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 134: 580–87.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A. (2012). From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds) (2016). The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, M. (2011a). ‘Syllable, segment and prosody’. In Maiden, M., Smith, J. C., and Ledgeway, A. (eds), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages. Vol I: Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 50–108.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, M. (2018) Gender from Latin to Romance: History, Geography, Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. (2016a). ‘Romanian, Istro-Romanian, Megleno-Romanian, and Aromanian’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91–125.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1935). Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Pfister, M. and Schweickard, W. (1979–). Lessico etimologico italiano. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (1999). Latine Loqui: Trends and Directions in the Crystallization of Classical Latin. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Sornicola, R. (2011). ‘Romance linguistics and historical linguistics: reflections on synchrony and diachrony’. In Maiden, M., Smith, J. C., and Ledgeway, A. (eds), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages. Vol I: Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–49.Google Scholar
Varvaro, A. (2011). ‘La ‘rupture étymologique’ del DÉRom. Ancora sul metodo dell’etimologia romanza’, Revue de linguistique romane 75: 623–27.Google Scholar
Weiss, M. (2017). [Review of Buchi and Schweickard (2014)], Kratylos 62: 127–53.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Adams, J. (2013). Social Variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. and Schmidt, J. E. (eds) (2010). Language and Space. Vol. 1: Theories and Methods. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cugno, F. and Massobrio, L. (2010). Gli atlanti linguistici della Romània. Corso di geografia linguistica. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Dees, A. (1980). Atlas des formes et des constructions des chartes françaises du 13e siècle. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Frank, B. and Hartmann, J. (1997). Inventaire systématique des premiers documents des langues romanes. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gheție, I. (ed.) (1997). Istoria limbii române literare. Epoca veche (1532–1780). Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Iliescu, M. and Roegiest, E. (eds) (2015). Manuel des anthologies, corpus et textes romans. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabatek, J. and Benito Moreno, C. (eds) (2016). Lingüística de corpus y lingüística histórica iberorrománica. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittel, H., House, J., and Schultze, B. (eds) (2004–11). Übersetzung. Translation. Traduction: ein internationales Handbuch zur Übersetzungsforschung. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lameli, A., Kehrein, R. and, Rabanus, S. (eds) (2010). Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Vol. 2: Language Mapping, Part I. Berlin: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzeltin, M. (2004). Las lenguas románicas estándar. Historia de su formación y de su uso. Oviedo: Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar
Trovato, P. (2014). Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lachmannʼs Method: A Non-Standard Handbook of Genealogical Textual Criticism in the Age of Post-Structuralism, Cladistic, and Copy-text. Padua: Libreriauniversitaria.it.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Calabrese, A. (2011). ‘Investigations on markedness, syncretism and zero exponence in morphology’, Morphology 21: 283–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cennamo, M. (2008). ‘The rise and development of analytic perfects in Italo-Romance’. In Eythórsson, T. (ed.), Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: The Rosendal Papers. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 115–42.Google Scholar
Clark, R. and Roberts, I. (1993). ‘A computational approach to language learnability and language change’, Linguistic Inquiry 24(2): 299–345.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1993). ‘Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection’, Studia Linguistica 47: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Fauci, N. (1988). Oggetti e soggetti nella formazione della morfosintassi romanza. Pisa: Giardini (English translation: La Fauci, N. (1994). Objects and Subjects in the Formation of Romance Morphosyntax. Bloomington, IN: IULC).Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A. (2019). ‘Parameters in the development of Romance perfective auxiliary selection’, in Cennamo, M. and Fabrizio, C. (eds), Historical Linguistics 2015. Selected Papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 343–84.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, M. (2007b). ‘On triple auxiliation in Romance’, Linguistics 45: 173–222.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, M. (2012). ‘A new strategy for progressive marking and its implications for grammaticalization theory: the subject clitic construction of Pantiscu’, Studies in Language 36(4): 747–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R. and Savoia, L. M. (2005). I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Poletto, C. and Tortora, C. (2016). ‘Subject clitics: syntax’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 772–85.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. (2014). ‘Subject clitics and macroparameters’. In Benincà, P, Ledgeway, A., and Vincent, N. (eds), Diachrony and Dialects: Grammatical change in the Dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, C. (1997). ‘Auxiliation and serialization: on discerning the difference’. In Alsina, A., Bresnan, J., and Sells, P. (eds), Complex Predicates. Stanford: CSLI, 175–202.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1996). ‘Syntax and phonology’. In Brown, K. and Miller, J. (eds), Concise Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories. Oxford: Elsevier, 300–05.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • What Is a Language?
  • Edited by Adam Ledgeway, University of Cambridge, Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • What Is a Language?
  • Edited by Adam Ledgeway, University of Cambridge, Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • What Is a Language?
  • Edited by Adam Ledgeway, University of Cambridge, Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.002
Available formats
×