Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:00:28.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Word Meanings and Concepts

from Part Five - Semantics and Pragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2022

By
Steven N. Dworkin
Edited by
Adam Ledgeway  and
Martin Maiden
Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Traditionally, Romance diachronic lexicology has focused on the formal and content-level semantic history of nominal, verbal, adjectival, and lexical adverbial bases. Lately, specialists in general historical linguistics have explored the interface between what appears to be syntactic change and certain semantic phenomena affecting the lexical items involved in these shifts. They have examined facets of language change usually associated with syntax but with consequences for the semantic status of the items involved, such as recurrent paths of grammaticalization and the less common phenomenon of degrammaticalization, as well as lexicalization, subjectification, the genesis of pragmatic and discourse markers, and the creation of lexical items with evidential functions. Romanists working on issues of diachronic lexicology are beginning to focus their attention on the genesis and subsequent evolution of prepositions, grammatical particles, pragmatic and discourse markers, as well as the acquisition by some independent lexical items of evidential and subjectification functions. Consequently, they are forging a new link between diachronic syntax and lexicology. Such an approach to lexical studies constitutes a fruitful meeting place for Romanists and for specialists in general historical linguists.

Keywords

lexical changesemantic changesyntactic changegrammaticalization processespragmatic markersdiscourse markersevidentialitysubjectification
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics , pp. 673 - 694
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Blank, A. and Koch, P., eds. (2003). Kognitive romanische Onomasiologie und Semasiologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. and Traugott, E. (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchi, E. and Dworkin, S.N. (2019). ‘Etymology in Romance’. In Loporcaro, M. and Gardani, F. (eds), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Romance Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.441Google Scholar
Cornillie, B. and Izquierdo Alegría, D. (eds) (2017). Gramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad. Pamplona: EUNSA.Google Scholar
Cruschina, S. and Remberger, E.-M., (eds) (2017). The Rise and Development of Evidential and Epistemic Markers. Special Issue of Journal of Historical Linguistics 7.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. (2018). ‘Where do evidentials come from?’ In Aikhenvald, A. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–54.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, C. and Molinelli, P. (eds) (2014). Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loureda, O. and Pons Bordería, S. (eds) (forthcoming). Discourse-Pragmatic Change in Romance. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Norde, M. (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolova, N. (2015). Cognitive Linguistics and Lexical Change. Motion Verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. and Dasher, R. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, D. (2017). ‘Degrammaticalization’. In Ledgeway, A. and Roberts, I. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×