Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:55:44.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 25 - Bodies and Routine Dynamics

from Part III - Themes in Routine Dynamics Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2021

By
Charlotte Blanche  and
Martha S. Feldman
Edited by
Martha S. Feldman ,
Brian T. Pentland ,
Luciana D'Adderio ,
Katharina Dittrich ,
Claus Rerup  and
David Seidl
Martha S. Feldman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Brian T. Pentland
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Luciana D'Adderio
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Katharina Dittrich
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Claus Rerup
Affiliation:
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management
David Seidl
Affiliation:
University of Zurich
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we shed light on bodies in the dynamics of routines. Though the body has just begun to be theorized in Routine Dynamics research, the body is, nonetheless, pervasive. We show how ubiquitous the bodies are in Routine Dynamics research by documenting the embodied orientation to and from performing, to and from patterns, and to and from situation or materiality in 13 reference articles. By exploring one of these articles in more depth, we show how theorizing the body more explicitly has potential for deepening our understanding of the processual mechanisms of routine dynamics.

Keywords

Routinesroutine dynamicsembodiment
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics , pp. 343 - 356
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aroles, J. and McLean, C. (2016). Rethinking stability and change in the study of organizational routines: Difference and repetition in a newspaper-printing factory. Organization Science, 27(3), 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R. and Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y. and King, J. L. (2016). Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s enterprise information system. Organization Science, 27(3), 551–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J. and Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016). The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 594–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohendet, P. and Simon, L. (2016). Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s video game studio. Organization Science, 27(3), 614–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
D’Adderio, L. (2001). Crafting the virtual prototype: How firms integrate knowledge and capabilities across organisational boundaries. Research Policy, 30(9), 1409–1424.Google Scholar
D’Adderio, L. (2011). Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 197–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danner-Schröder, A. and Geiger, D. (2016). Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization Science, 27(3), 633–658.Google Scholar
Deken, F., Carlile, P. R., Berends, H. and Lauche, K. (2016). Generating novelty through interdependent routines: A process model of routine work. Organization Science, 27(3), 659–677.Google Scholar
de Rond, M., Holeman, I. and Howard-Grenville, J. (2019). Sensemaking from the body: An enactive ethnography of rowing the Amazon. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1961–1988.Google Scholar
Dittrich, K., Guérard, S. and Seidl, D. (2016). Talking about routines: The role of reflective talk in routine change. Organization Science, 27(3), 678–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionysiou, D. D. and Tsoukas, H. (2013). Understanding the (re) creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (2017). On expertise and embodiment: Insights from Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Samuel Todes. In Sandberg, J., Rouleau, L., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Skillful Performance: Enacting Capabilities, Knowledge, Competence and Expertise in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–159.Google Scholar
Eberhard, J., Frost, A. and Rerup, C. (2019). The dark side of routine dynamics: Deceit and the work of Romeo pimps. Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 61, 99–121.Google Scholar
Ewenstein, B. and Whyte, J. (2007). Beyond words: Aesthetic knowledge and knowing in organizations. Organization Studies, 28(5), 689–708.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2016). Routines as process: Past, present, and future. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed, Perspectives on Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, S., Merilainen, S., Strati, A. and Valtonen, A. (2013), Editors’ introduction: A practice–based view on the body, senses and knowing in organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 4(29), 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D. and Strati, A. (2007). The passion for knowing. Organization, 14(3), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindmarsh, J. and Pilnick, A. (2007). Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1395–1416.Google Scholar
Joas, H. (1996). The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. and Rohrer, T. (2007). We are live creatures: Embodiment, American Pragmatism, and the cognitive organism. In Zlatev, J., Ziemke, T., Frank, R. and Dirven, R., eds., Body, Language, and Mind, vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17–54.Google Scholar
Kremser, W. and Schreyögg, G. (2016). The dynamics of interrelated routines: Introducing the cluster level. Organization Science, 27(3), 698–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, C., Christianson, M. K., Garrett, L. and Ilan, R. (2016). Coordinating flexible performance during everyday work: An ethnomethodological study of handoff routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 514–534.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. 1938. The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. 2002. (First published in 1932.) The Philosophy of the Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/1945). Phenomenology of Perception (trans. Smith, C..). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964) The Primacy of Perception, Edie, J., ed. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Rueter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, (39), 484–510.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1966). The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy, 41(155), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, J. and Tsoukas, H. (2020). Sensemaking reconsidered: Towards a broader understanding through phenomenology. Organization Theory, 1(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sele, K. and Grand, S. (2016). Unpacking the dynamics of ecologies of routines: Mediators and their generative effects in routine interactions. Organization Science, 27(3), 722–738.Google Scholar
Sergeeva, A. V., Faraj, S. and Huysman, M. (2020). Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organization Science, 1–24.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies, 27(4), 585–604.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2008). Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: Action guiding anticipations and the continuous creation of novelty. Organization Studies, 29(4), 501–524.Google Scholar
Sonenshein, S. (2016). Routines and creativity: From dualism to duality. Organization Science, 27(3), 739–758.Google Scholar
Spee, P., Jarzabkowski, P. and Smets, M. (2016). The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organization Science, 27(3), 759–781.Google Scholar
Strati, A. (2007). Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learning, 38(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, F. W. (1911). Scientific Management. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, I., Lenzen, M. and Knoblich, G., eds. (2008). Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2015). For a sociology of flesh and blood. Qualitative Sociology, 38(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Wright, A. (2019). Embodied organizational routines: Explicating a practice understanding. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 153–165.Google Scholar
Yakhlef, A. (2010). The corporeality of practice-based learning. Organization Studies, 31(4), 409–430.Google Scholar
Yakhlef, A. and Essén, A. (2013). Practice innovation as bodily skills: The example of elderly home care service delivery. Organization, 20(6), 881–903.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, Y. and Hiramoto, T. (2016). Reflexivity of routines: An ethnomethodological investigation of initial service encounters at sushi bars in Tokyo. Organization Studies, 37(10), 1473–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×