Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:14:52.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 32 - Unexpected Events and Routine Dynamics

from Part III - Themes in Routine Dynamics Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2021

By
Daniel Geiger  and
Anja Danner-Schröder
Edited by
Martha S. Feldman ,
Brian T. Pentland ,
Luciana D'Adderio ,
Katharina Dittrich ,
Claus Rerup  and
David Seidl
Martha S. Feldman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Brian T. Pentland
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Luciana D'Adderio
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Katharina Dittrich
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Claus Rerup
Affiliation:
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management
David Seidl
Affiliation:
University of Zurich
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we examine the contribution of routine dynamics studies toward the management of unexpected events. In particular, we explore how routine dynamics studies have extended our insights into flexible coordination in the face of the unexpected and how such a perspective generates novel insights into the way people make sense of unexpected events, how they mindfully operate during the occurrence of unexpected events, and how improvisation is enacted as routine performance. In this review, we connect routine dynamics studies with research on crisis management and discuss how a routine dynamics perspective expands the research agenda for the management of unexpected events and crises.

Keywords

Routinesroutine dynamicsunexpected eventscrisissensemakingimprovisationmindfulnessflexibilitycoordination
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics , pp. 433 - 442
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashforth, B. and Fried, Y. (1988). The mindless of organizational behaviors. Human Relations, 41(4), 305–329.Google Scholar
Baker, N. D., Feldman, M. and Lowerson, V. (2013). Working through disaster: Re-establishing mental health care after Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 7(3), 222–231.Google ScholarPubMed
Baker, T. and Nelson, R. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.Google Scholar
Bechky, B. A. and Okhuysen, G. A. (2011). Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle suprises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 239–262.Google Scholar
Berliner, P. F. (1994). Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bigley, G. A. and Roberts, K. H. (2001). The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1281–1299.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016). The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 594–613.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P. (2012). Sensemaking under pressure: The influence of professional roles and social accountability on the creation of sense. Organization Science, 23(1), 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014). The contraction of meaning: The combined effect of communication, emotions, and materiality on sensemaking in the Stockwell Shooting. Journal of Management Studies, 51(5), 699–736.Google Scholar
Cunha, M. P., Cunha, J. V. and Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why? International Journal of Management Review, 1(3), 299–341.Google Scholar
Cunha, M. P., Miner, A. S. and Antonacopoulou, E. (2017). Improvisation processes in organizations. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: Sage, pp. 559–573.Google Scholar
Danner-Schröder, A. (2016). Routine dynamics and routine interruptions: How to create and recreate recognizability of routine patterns. Managementforschung, 26(1), 63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danner-Schröder, A. and Geiger, D. (2016). Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel-dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization Science, 27(3), 633–658.Google Scholar
Danner-Schröder, A. and Müller-Seitz, G. (2020). Temporal co-dependence between temporary and permanent organizing: Tackling grand challenges in the case of the refugee crisis in Germany. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 67, 179–208.Google Scholar
Dittrich, K., Guérard, S. and Seidl, D. (2016). Talking about routines: The role of reflective talk in routine change. Organization Science, 27(3), 678–697.Google Scholar
Faraj, S. and Xiao, Y. (2006). Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Science, 52(8), 1155–1169.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. (2016). Routines as process: Past, present and future. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed: Perspectives on Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. and Pentland, B. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.Google Scholar
Feldman, M., Pentland, B., D’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Rafaeli, A. (2002). Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, D., Danner-Schröder, A. and Kremser, W. (2021). Getting ahead of time: Performing temporal boundaries to coordinate routines under temporal uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(1), 220–264.Google Scholar
Haerem, T., Pentland, B. T. and Miller, K. D. (2015). Task complexity: Extending a core concept. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 446–460.Google Scholar
Kamoche, K., Cunha, M. P. and Cunha, J. V. (2003). Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: Looking beyond the Jazz metaphor. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2023–2051.Google Scholar
LeBaron, C., Christianson, M. K., Garrett, L. and Ilan, R. (2016). Coordinating flexible performance during everyday work: An ethnomethodological study of handoff routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 514–534.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D. and Rerup, C. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17(4), 502–513.Google Scholar
Maitlis, S. (2005). The social process of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.Google Scholar
Maitlis, S. and Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125.Google Scholar
Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Hollingshead, A. B. (2007). Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18(1), 147–161.Google Scholar
Okhuysen, G. (2005). Understanding group behavior: How a police SWAT team creates, changes, and manages group routines. In Elsbach, K. D., ed., Qualitative Organizational Research. Greenwich, CT: Information Age, pp. 139–168.Google Scholar
Patriotta, G. and Gruber, D. A. (2015). Newsmaking and sensemaking: Navigating temporal transitions between planned and unexpected events. Organization Science, 26(6), 1574–1592.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Rueter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484–510.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. and Rerup, C. (2017). Opening the black box: Microfoundations of institutions. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Meyer, R. E., eds., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 311–337.Google Scholar
Ravasi, D., Rindova, V. and Stigliani, I. (2019). The stuff of legend: History, memory and the temporality of organizational identity construction. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1523–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rerup, C. (2009). Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organization Science, 20(5), 876–893.Google Scholar
Rerup, C. and Feldman, M. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 577–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1413–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C. (2009). Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organization Science, 20(2), 384–409.Google Scholar
Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2018). Routine regulation: Balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 170–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, J. and Tsoukas, H. (2015). Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, S6–S32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawinski, N. and Bansal, P. (2012). A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1537–1563.Google Scholar
Spee, P., Jarzabkowski, P. and Smets, M. (2016). The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organization Science, 23, 759–781.Google Scholar
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709.Google Scholar
Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 24–46.Google Scholar
Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. P. (2018). Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1253–1280.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science, 17(4), 514–524.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the Unexpected - Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. and Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×