Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:14:50.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Negation and Polarity

from Part 3 - Syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

By
Luka Szucsich
Edited by
Danko Šipka  and
Wayles Browne
Danko Šipka
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Wayles Browne
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

This chapter gives an overview of phenomena connected to polarity, especially negation, in Slavic languages. The formation of negation in Slavic is rather uniform across languages and historically relatively stable. Further, the chapter discusses the distribution of linguistic expressions connected to different environments involving polarity. The latter includes negative concord and polarity items with a major focus on different series of indefinites. These environments for indefinites are discussed: (i) specific (known to the speaker), (ii) specific (unknown to the speaker), (iii) non-specific (irrealis), (iv) polar question, (v) conditional protasis, (vi) indirect negations, (vii) direct negation, (viii) standard of comparison, and (ix) free choice. Additional negative polarity items are presented, such as scalar particles. Lastly, the chapter treats case alternations in the scope of sentential negation (genitive of negation), which is a feature inherited from Common Slavic, but not present in all modern Slavic languages. The genitive of negation exhibits differing properties in those languages which preserved it.

Keywords

polaritynegationnegative concordindefinitespolarity itemsgenitive of negation
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics , pp. 405 - 429
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abels, K. (2005). ‘Expletive negation’ in Russian: A conspiracy theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 13(1), 5–74.Google Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. (2004). The case of Q. In Arnaudova, O., Browne, W., Rivero, M. L., & Stojanović, D., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Languages 12. The Ottawa Meeting, 2003, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Betsch, M. (2003). Questions as indirect requests in Russian and Czech. In Jaszczolt, K. & Turner, K., eds., Meaning through Language Contrast. Vol. 2, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2001). Investigation into the Interaction between the Indefinites and Negation, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2002). Towards a binding analysis of negative polarity items in Polish. In Kosta, P. & Frasek, J., eds., Current Approaches to Formal Slavic Linguistics, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 377–404.Google Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2003). (Negative) polarity items in Polish: Towards a uniform account. In Maienborn, C., ed., (A)Symmetrien – (A)Symmetries. Beiträge zu Ehren von Ewald Lang – Papers in Honor of Ewald Lang, Tübingen: Stauffenburg, pp. 25–56.Google Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2008a). The puzzle of kolwiek-pronouns in Polish. In Jayez, J. & Tovena, L., eds., Free Choice: Facts, Models and Problems, Hamburg: University of Hamburg, pp. 3–12. http://elico.linguist.jussieu.fr/FCesslli08proceedings.pdf (accessed August 20, 2021).Google Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2008b). What HAS to BE used? Existential, locative, and possessive sentences in Polish. In Antonenko, A., Bailyn, J., & Bethin, C., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16. The Stony Brook Meeting, 2007, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
Bogusławski, A. (1985). The problem of the negated imperative in perfective verbs revisited. Russian Linguistics, 9(2/3), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. (1999). The Syntax of Negation in Russian, Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Brown, S. & Franks, S. (1995). Asymmetries in the scope of Russian negation. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 3(2), 239–287.Google Scholar
Denić, M., Steinert-Threlkeld, S., & Szymanik, J. (2020). Complexity/informativeness trade-off in the domain of indefinite pronouns. In Rhyne, J. et al., eds., Proceedings of the 30th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, Washington, DC: LSA, pp. 166–184.Google Scholar
Durst-Andersen, P. (1995). Imperative frames and modality. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18(6), 611–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, D. (1995). Mobile inflection in Polish. In Beckman, J. N., ed., Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 25. Vol. 2, Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
Garzonio, J. (2019). Negative concord in Russian. An overview. In Krapova, I. et al., eds.,Studi di linguistica slava. Nuove prospettive e metodologie di ricercar, Venice: Edizioni Ca‘ Foscari, pp. 175–189.Google Scholar
Geist, L. (2008). Specificity as referential anchoring: Evidence from Russian. In Grønn, A., ed., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, Oslo: ILOS, pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
Geist, L. (2010). Indefinitpronomina im Russischen und Spezifizität. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 55(2), 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, A. & Quer, J. (1995). Two mechanisms for the licensing of negative indefinites. In Gabriele, L. et al., eds., Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America. Vol. 2, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, pp. 103–105.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A. & Quer, J. (1997). Long distance licensing of negative indefinites. In Forget, D. et al., eds., Negation and Polarity: Syntax and Semantics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, A. & Yoon, S. (2013). No NPI licensing in comparatives. In Baglini, R. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 2, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago: CLS, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Lohndal, T. (2010). Negative concord and (multiple) Agree: A case study of West Flemish. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(2), 181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Zanuttini, R. (1991). Negative heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review, 8(2–4), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B. (2004). The grammaticalization of the analytical imperatives in Russian, Polish and Serbian/Croatian. Welt der Slaven, 49(2), 257–274.Google Scholar
Hartmann, J. & Milićević, N. (2008). The syntax of existential sentences in Serbian. In Antonenko, A., Bailyn, J., & Bethin, C., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16. The Stony Brook Meeting, 2007, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 168–184.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1997). Indefinite Pronouns, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, L. (2001). A Natural History of Negation, Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Huntley, D. (1993). Old Church Slavonic. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 125–187.Google Scholar
Kagan, O. (2007). Property-denoting NPs and non-canonical genitive case. In Friedman, T. & Gibson, M., eds., Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XVII, Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistic Circle, pp. 148–165.Google Scholar
Kagan, O. (2010). Genitive objects, existence and individuation. Russian Linguistics, 34(1), 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klockmann, H. (2014). Case alternations: The interaction of semi-lexicality and case assignment. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 9(3), 111–136.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. E. (1997). Negation and the grammaticalization of have and want futures in Bulgarian and Macedonian. Canadian Slavonic Papers/Revue Canadienne des Slavistes, 39(3/4), 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasovitsky, A., Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. G. (2011). Changing semantic factors in case selection: Russian evidence from the last two centuries. Morphology, 21(3), 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kryshevich, O. (2010). The Genitive of Negation in Ukrainian. PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, W. A. (1979). Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Levinson, D. (2008). Licensing of Negative Polarity Particles Yet, Anymore, Either and Neither: Combining Downward Monotonicity and Assertivity. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, J. (2010). Mood in Bulgarian and Macedonian. In Thieroff, R. & Rothstein, B., eds., Mood in the Languages of Europe. Vol. 2: Slavic and Other European Languages, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löbner, S. (2000). Polarity in natural language: Predication, quantification and negation in particular and characterizing sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 213–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyutikova, E. (2021). On the structure of Russian infinitival clauses, with special attention to negative concord. Talk given at Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 30, MIT.Google Scholar
Matushansky, O. (2010). Some cases of Russian. In Zybatow, G. et al., eds., Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics [Proceedings of FDSL 7.5], Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 117–135.Google Scholar
Migdalski, K. (2006). The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Migdalski, K. (2013). Diachronic source of two cliticization patterns in Slavic. In Meklenborg Salvesen, C. & Petter Helland, H., eds., Challenging Clitics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišeska Tomić, O. (2001). The Macedonian negation operator and cliticization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19(3), 647–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolova, R. (2017). Bulgarian Grammar, Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Padučeva, E. (2015). Snjataja utverditel‘nost‘ i neveridikal‘nost‘ (na primere russkix mestoimenij otricatel‘noj poljarnosti). Russian Linguistics, 39(2), 129–162.Google Scholar
Penka, D. (2016). Negation and polarity. In Riemer, N., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 303–319.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. (2006). Negative polarity items in Russian and the Bagel problem. In Przepiórkowski, A. & Brown, S., eds., Negation in Slavic, Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers, pp. 153–178.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1982). Paths and Categories. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pirnat, Ž. (2015). Genesis of the genitive of negation in Balto-Slavic and its evidence in contemporary Slovenian. Slovenski jezik, 10, 3–52.Google Scholar
Progovac, L. (1993). Negative polarity: Downward entailment and binding. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(2), 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L. (1994). Negative and Positive Polarity: A Binding Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L. (2000). Coordination, c-command, and logophoric n-words. In Horn, L. & Kato, Y., eds., Studies on Negation and Polarity, Oxford & New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, A. (2000). Long distance genitive of negation in Polish. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 8(1/2), 119–158.Google Scholar
Rejzek, J. (2015). Český etymologický slovník, Prague: Leda.Google Scholar
Snoj, M. (2016). Slovenski etimološki slovar. 3. pregledana in dopolnjena izd, Ljubljana: Modrijan.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. & Luís, A. R. (2012). Clitics. An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. (2004). Positive polarity – negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22(2), 409–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szucsich, L. (2010). Mood in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian. In Thieroff, R. & Rothstein, Bj, eds., Mood in the Languages of Europe. Vol. 2: Slavic and Other European Languages, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, A. (1975). Hierarchies in the genitive of negation. Slavic and East European Journal, 19(2), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J. & Gybels, P. (2014). On negation, indefinites, and negative indefinites in Yiddish. In Aptroot, M. & Hansen, B., eds., Yiddish Language Structures, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 185–230.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J., Nomachi, M., & Krasnoukhova, O. (2021). Connective negation and negative concord in Balto-Slavic. In Arkadiev, P. et al., eds., Studies in Baltic and Other Languages, Vilnius: Vilnius University Press, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
Večerka, R. (1989). Altkirchenslavische (altbulgarische) Syntax I: Die lineare Satzorganisation, Freiburg: U. W. Weiher.Google Scholar
Veselinova, L. (2008). Negation of Non-Verbal and Existential Sentences in Slavic Languages. Ms. Stockholm. www2.ling.su.se/staff/ljuba/LL_summary.pdf (accessed August 20, 2021).Google Scholar
Veselinova, L. (2010). Standard and special negators in the Slavonic languages: Synchrony and diachrony. In Hansen, B. & Grković-Major, J., eds., Diachronic Slavonic Syntax. Gradual Changes in Focus, Munich: Otto Sagner, pp. 195–208.Google Scholar
Vince, J. (2008). Uzmak genitiva izravnoga objekta. Slovo [Zagreb] (56–57), 615–626.Google Scholar
Willis, D. (2013). Negation in the history of Slavonic languages. In Willis, D. et al., eds., The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean. Vol. 1: Case Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 341–398.Google Scholar
Witkoś, J. (2008). Genitive of negation in Polish and single-cycle derivations. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 16(2), 247–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, R. (1991). Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, H. (2004). Sentential Negation and Negative Concord, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Zovko Dinković, I. & Ilc, G.. (2017). Pleonastic negation from a cross-linguistic perspective. Jezikoslovlje 18(1): 159–180.Google Scholar
Zwarts, F. (1998). Three types of polarity items. In Hamm, F. & Hinrichs, E., eds., Plurality and Quantification, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 177–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×