Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:07:22.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Developing Ethnomethodology: Garfinkel on the Constitutive Interactional Practices in Social Systems of Interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

This chapter focuses on the historical development of ethnomethodology, presenting Harold Garfinkel’s career-spanning efforts to develop a theory of the constitutive interactional practices in social systems of interaction. Specifically, it examines five stages in that developmental process: 1939–1942 in North Carolina; 1942–1946 in the Army Air Force; 1946-1952 at Harvard; 1952–1953 at Princeton; and finally his long career at UCLA, extending from 1954 to 2011.

Anne Rawls is Professor of Sociology at Bentley University. Her research interests focus broadly on social theory, with emphases on ethnomethodology, communication studies, democracy, and race relations. In addition to publishing extensively on Garfinkel and ethnomethodology, she has also published on Durkheim and DuBois. She recently coauthored Tacit Racism with Waverly Duck.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Boguslaw, Robert. 1965. The New Utopians: A Study of System Design and Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1936. Permanence and Change. New York: New Republic.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. 1904. The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1893. The Division of Social Labor. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1940. “Color Trouble,” published in Opportunity, May. [Reprinted in O’Brien, Edward J. (ed.) 1941. The Best Short Stories of 1941. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; and Moon, Bucklin (ed.) 1945. Primer for White Folks. New York: Doubleday.]Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 1949. “Research Note on Inter- and Intro-Racial Homicide.” Social Forces 27(4): 369381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 1963. “A Conception of and Experiments with Trust as a Condition of Stable Social Actions.” In O. J. Harvey (ed.), Motivation and Social Interaction: Cognitive Determinants (pp. 187238). New York: Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 2006. Seeing Sociologically. The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Edited with an introduction by Rawls, Anne Warfield. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 2012 [1947]. “The Red as an Ideal Object.” Ethnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa 4(1): 718.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 2019a. Parsons’ Primer. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 2019b [1942]. The History of Gulfport Field 1942: The Aircraft Mechanics School. Stuttgart: Springer.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, Lynch, Michael, and Livingston, Eric. 1981. The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar.Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 131158.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, and Sacks, Harvey. 1970. “On Formal Structures of Practical Action.” In McKinney, John C. and Tiryakian, E. A. (eds.), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments (pp. 338366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Glenda. 2008. Defying Dixie: The Radical Roots of Civil Rights 1919–1950. W. W. Norton: New York.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums. Chicago, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aron. 1964. Field of Consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karen. 2001. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1993. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Odum, Howard. 1930. “Folk and Regional Conflict as a Field of Sociological Study.” Presidential Address at the ASS annual meeting, December 1930, Cleveland, OH. Proceedings of the American Sociological Society. Washington, DC: American Sociological Society.Google Scholar
Odum, Howard.1943. Race and Rumors of Race: The American South in the Early Forties. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Odum, Howard.1964 [1947]. “Folkways and Technicways.” In Folk, Region, and Society: Selected Papers of Howard W. Odum. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott.1949. Presidential Address: “The Prospects of Social Theory.American Sociological Review 15(1): 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott.1960. “The Pattern Variables Revisited: A Response to Robert Dubin.” American Sociological Review 25(4): 467483.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott.1963. “On the Concept of Influence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27(1): 3762.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne. 1996. “Durkheim’s Epistemology: The Neglected Argument.” American Journal of Sociology 102(2): 430482.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne.2005. “Garfinkel’s Conception of Time.” Time and Society 14(2–3): 163190.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne.2008 [2004]. Durkheim’s Epistemology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne.2012. “Durkheim’s Theory of Modernity: Self-Regulating Practices as Constitutive Orders of Social & Moral Facts.” Journal of Classical Sociology 12(3): 479512.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne.2015. “Getting Information Systems to Interact: The Social Fact Character of ‘Object’ Clarity as a Factor in Designing Information Systems.” The Information Society 31(2): 175192.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne. 2018. “The Wartime Narrative in US Sociology 1940–1947: Stigmatizing Qualitative Sociology in the name of ‘Science.’” The European Journal of Social Theory 59(1): 526546.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne.2019. Developing a Sociological Theory of Justice: Durkheim’s Forgotten Introduction to The Division of Social Labor. Paris: Bord de L’eau.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne.2020. “Harold Garfinkel’s Focus on Racism, Inequality and Social Justice: The Early Years 1939–1952.” In Heritage, John and Maynard, Doug (eds.), Ethnomethodology: A Retrospective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne W., Jeffrey, Adam, and Mann, David. 2016. “Locating the Modern Sacred: Moral/Social Facts and Constitutive Practices.Journal of Classical Sociology 16(1): 5368.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Rosalind. 2017. Jane Crow: The Life of Pauli Murray. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Brewster, Bruner, Jerome, and White, Robert. 1956. Opinions and Personality. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar

Unpublished Manuscripts by Harold Garfinkel in the Garfinkel Archive

“Bastrop Notes.” 1942. Appendix 5: Garfinkel, 1952.Google Scholar
Book draft on Criminology. 1951. Princeton.Google Scholar
First version of the “Trust” paper. Conference paper, 1951.Google Scholar
“A Further Note on the Prospectus for an Exploratory Study of Communication and the Maintenance of Understanding in Selected Types of Dyadic Relationship with Particular Reference to the Jew as an Object of Social Treatment.” Dissertation prospectus, 1948.Google Scholar
“Initial Proposal for Some Studies of the Determinants of the Effectiveness of the Communicative Work of Leaders.” 1944. Appendix 3: Garfinkel, 1952.Google Scholar
“Inter-Racial and Intra-Racial Homicide in Ten Counties in North Carolina, 1930–1940.” MA Thesis, 1942.Google Scholar
“The Jew as an Intended Object in Selected Types of Dyadic Relationship.” December 3, 1948. Dissertation prospectus, 1948.Google Scholar
“Memorandum #1: Notes on the Sociological Attitude.” 1951.Google Scholar
Memorandum #2 on Criminology. 1951. Princeton.Google Scholar
“Notes on the Information Apperception Test.” 1947.Google Scholar
“The Perception of the Other: A Study in Social Order.” Harvard PhD dissertation, June 1952.Google Scholar
Several book proposals, c. 1958.Google Scholar
Some Conceptions of and Experiments with Trust as a Condition of Stable Concerted Action.” Unpublished conference presentation. American Sociological Association annual meeting, Detroit, MI, September 5–7, 1956.Google Scholar
“Some Reflections on Action Theory and the Theory of Social Systems,” 1946.Google Scholar
“A Statement of the Problem of Communicative Strategies in Self-Maintaining Systems of Activity.” 1951. Appendix 1: Garfinkel, 1952.Google Scholar
Studies in Ethnomethodology, early unpublished drafts, 1961–1962.Google Scholar
“Toward a Sociological Theory of Information.” Organizational Behavior Project Manuscript #3, April 17, 1952.Google Scholar

Coauthored Works by Garfinkel in the Garfinkel Archive

Garfinkel, Harold, Robert Boguslaw, and Warren Pelton. “Decision Making in Complex Situations: An Analysis of a Chess Tournament.” Unpublished, 1957.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, and Bittner, Egon. Presentation of the Clinic Study in Garfinkel’s class. Unpublished, 1959. Transcript in the Garfinkel Archive.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×