Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:07:58.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Symbolic Interactionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

The chapter examines the influential perspective of symbolic interactionism with regard to its defining assumptions, its historical emergence, and its present status, both in the United States and internationally. The discussion covers debates among interactionists regarding theory and methodology, and it also considers intellectual movements strongly influenced by interactionism, especially identity theory, labeling theory, dramaturgy, and constructionism.

Lawrence T. Nichols is a former professor of sociology, recently retired from West Virginia University. He continues to do research and to publish on sociological theory, the construction of social problems, and the history and sociology of social science. Dr. Nichols also edits The American Sociologist, a quarterly journal with an international readership.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akers, Ronald. 1967. “Problems in the Sociology of Deviance: Social Definitions and Behavior.” Social Forces 46: 455465.Google Scholar
Akagawa, Manabu. 2015. “Regulating Pornocomic Sales to Juveniles in Japan.” Qualitative Sociology Review 11(2): 6373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athens, Lonnie. 2007. “Radical Interactionism: Going Beyond Mead.” Journal for theTheory of Social Behavior 37: 137165.Google Scholar
Ayukawa, Jun. 2015. “Claims-Making and Human Rights in Domestic and International Spheres.” QualitaVitive Sociology Review 11(2): 110121.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. (ed.). 1964. The Other Side. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Best, Joel (ed.). 1989. Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Best, Joel. 1993. “But Seriously, Folks.” In Holstein, James and Miller, Gale (eds.), Reconsidering Social Constructionism (pp. 129–147). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Best, Joel. (ed.). 1995. Images of Issues. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Best, Joel. 2015. “Beyond Case Studies: Expanding the Constructionist Framework for Social Problems Research.” Qualitative Sociology Review 11(2):1833.Google Scholar
Best, Joel, and Lowney, Kathleen. 1995. “Stalking Strangers and Lovers.” In Joel, Best (ed.),Images of Issues, 2nd edition (pp. 33–57). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1933. Movies and Conduct. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1935. “The Moulding of Mass Behavior through the Motion Picture.” Publications of the American Sociological Society 29: 115127.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1937. “Social Psychology.” In Peter, Schmidt (ed.), Man and Society: A Substantive Introduction to the Social Sciences (pp. 144–198). New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Burke, P. J. 2004. “Identity and Social Structure.” Social Psychology Quarterly 67: 515.Google Scholar
Campbell, Bradley, and Jason, Manning. 2018. The Rise of Victimhood Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Campion-Vincent, Veronique. 2001. “The Diffusion of Organ-Theft Narratives.” In Best, Joel (ed.), How Claims Spread: Cross-National Diffusion of Social Problems (pp. 185–213). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
Carter, Michael J., and Fuller, Celene. 2016. “Symbols, Meaning, and Action: The Past, Present, and Future of Symbolic Interactionism.” Current Sociology Review 64(6): 931961.Google Scholar
Cavender, Gray, Nancy, Jurik, and Cohen, Albert K.. 1993. “The Baffling Case of the Smoking Gun: The Social Ecology of Political Accounts in the Iran-Contra Affair.” Social Problems 40:152166.Google Scholar
Cooley, Charles H. 1902. Human Nature and Social Order. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Couch, Carl. 1987. Researching Social Processes in the Laboratory. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Couch, Carl, and Hintz, Robert Jr. 1975. Constructing Social Life. Champaign, IL: Stipes.Google Scholar
Couch, Carl, Saxton, M., and Katovich, M.. 1986. Studies in Symbolic Interaction: The Iowa School. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Crawley, Sarah. 2018. “Encampment.” The American Sociologist 49(2): 3558.Google Scholar
Della Buono, Richard. 2015. “Reimagining Social Problems: Moving Beyond Social Constructionism.” Social Problems 62(3): 331342.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman (ed.). 1992. Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
DuBois, W. E. B. 1903. The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago, IL: McClurg.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1983 [1955]. Pragmatism and Sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Kai. 1967. Wayward Puritans. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 1993. “The Sad Demise, Mysterious Disappearance and Glorious Triumph of Symbolic Interactionism.” Annual Review of Sociology 19: 6187.Google Scholar
Gary Alan, Fine (ed.). 1995. A Second Chicago School? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, and Sandstrom, Kent L.. 2003. “Triumphs, Emerging Voices, and the Future.” In Reynolds, Larry T. and Herman-Kinney, Nancy J. (eds.), Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism (pp. 1041–1057). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
Furedi, Frank. 2018. How Fear Works: Culture of Fear in the 21st Century. London: Bloomsbury Continuum.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1956. “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies.” American Journal of Sociology 67(5): 420424.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jack. 1966. “Conceptions of Deviant Behavior: The Old and the New.” Pacific Sociological Review 9(1): 914.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jack. 1971. “A Critique of the Labelling Perspective.” In Rubington, Earl and Weinberg, M. (eds.), The Study of Social Problems (pp. 51–78). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney and Strauss, Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1962. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1969. Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1979. Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goode, Eric, and Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. 1994. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gove, Walter. 1970. “Societal Reaction as an Explanation of Mental Illness.” American Sociological Review 35: 973984.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph. 1986. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Huebner, Daniel R. 2014. Becoming Mead: The Social Process of Academic Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hughey, Matthew W., and Goss, Devon R.. 2018. “‘With Whom No White Scholar Can Compare’: Academic Interpretations of the Relationship between W. E. B. DuBois and Max Weber.” The American Sociologist 49(2): 181217.Google Scholar
Ibarra, Peter, and Kitsuse, John. 1993. “Vernacular Constituents of Moral Discourse: An Interactionist Proposal for the Study of Social Problems.” In Holstein, James A. and Miller, Gale (eds.), Reconsidering Social Constructionism (pp. 25–58). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Philip. 1995. Using Murder: The Social Construction of Serial Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jenness, Valerie. 1993. Making It Work: The Prostitutes’ Rights Movement in Perspective. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Katovich, Michael A., ed. 2017. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Volume 49: Carl J. Couch and the Iowa School in His Own Words and in Reflection. Emerald Insight.Google Scholar
Katovich, Michael, and Chen, S. L.. 2014. “The New Iowa School Redux: Second Life as Laboratory.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 43: 6384.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Manford. 1964. “Major Trends in Symbolic Interaction Theory in the Past Twenty-Five Years.” The Sociological Quarterly 5(1): 6168.Google Scholar
Lee, Matthew T., and Ermann, David. 1999. “Pinto ‘Madness’ as a Flawed Landmark Narrative: An Organizational and Network Analysis.” Social Problems 46(1): 3047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemert, Edwin M. 1951. Social Pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lopata, Helen Znaniecka. 2003. “Symbolic Interactionism and I.” Symbolic Interaction 26(1): 151172.Google Scholar
Mead, George H. 1922. “A Behavioristic Account of the Significant Symbol.” Journal of Philosophy 19: 157163.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1948. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” The Antioch Review: 174190.Google Scholar
Nichols, Lawrence. 1989. “Collective Moral Entrepreneurs: Congressional Committees and White-Collar Crime.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems in Berkeley, CA on August 6, 1989.Google Scholar
Nichols, Lawrence. 1991. “‘Whistleblowers’ or ‘Renegades’: Definitional Contests in an Official Inquiry.Symbolic Interaction 14(4): 395414.Google Scholar
Nichols, Lawrence. 1997. “Social Problems as Landmark Narratives: Bank of Boston, Mass Media, and ‘Money Laundering.’” Social Problems 44(3): 324341.Google Scholar
Nichols, Lawrence T. 1990. “Reconceptualizing Social Accounts: An Agenda for Theory Building and Empirical Research.” Current Perspectives in Social Theory 10: 113144.Google Scholar
Nichols, Lawrence T.. 2003. “Voices of Social Problems: A Dialogical Constructionist Model.” In Denzin, Norman K. (ed.), Studies in Symbolic Interaction (pp. 93–123). New York: Emerald Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1878. “How to Make Our Ideas Clear.” Popular Science Monthly 12: 286302.Google Scholar
Poso, Tarja. 2001. “Child Protection without Children – or Finnish Children without Problems?” In Best, Joel (ed.), How Claims Spread (pp. 283304). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. 1967. The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Prus, Robert. 2009. “Reconceptualizing the Study of Community Life: Emile Durkheim’s Pragmatism and Sociology.” The American Sociologist 40(1–2): 106146.Google Scholar
Reinarman, Craig, and Levine, Harry G.. 1995. “The Crack Attack.” In Best, Joel (ed.), Images of Issues (pp. 147–186). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Larry T. 2003. “Intellectual Precursors.” In Reynolds, Larry T. and Herman-Kinney, Nancy J. (eds.), Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism (pp. 39–58). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Larry T., and Herman-Kinney, Nancy J. (eds.). 2003. Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Marvin B., and Lyman, Stanford M.. 1968. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33(1): 4662.Google Scholar
Serpe, Richard T. 1987. “Stability and Change in Self: A Structural Symbolic Interactionist Explanation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 4455.Google Scholar
Serpe, Richard T., and Stryker, Sheldon. 2011. “The Symbolic Interactionist Perspective and Identity Theory.” In Schwartz, S., Luyckx, K., and Vignoles, V. (eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 225–248). London: Springer.Google Scholar
Shalin, Dmitri N. 2016. “Erving Goffman, Fateful Action, and the Las Vegas Gambling Scene.UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal 20(1): 138.Google Scholar
Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 2007. “The Strength of Weak Identities: Social Structural Sources, Situation and Emotional Experience.” Social Psychology Quarterly 70: 106124.Google Scholar
Spector, Malcolm and Kitsuse, John. 1977. Constructing Social Problems. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.Google Scholar
Stets, Jan E. 2010. “Future Directions in the Sociology of Emotions.” Emotion Review 2(3): 265268.Google Scholar
Stets, Jan E., and Biga, C. F.. 2003. “Bringing Identity Theory into Environmental Sociology.” Sociological Theory 21(4): 398423.Google Scholar
Stets, Jan E., and Carter, Michael J.. 2012. “A Theory of the Self for the Sociology of Morality.” American Sociological Review 77(1): 120140.Google Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 1968. “Identity Salience and Role Performance.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 4: 558564.Google Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 1982. Symbolic Interaction: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.Google Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 2003. “Whither Symbolic Interaction? Reflections on a Personal Odyssey.” Symbolic Interaction 26(1): 95109.Google Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 2008. “From Mead to a Structural Symbolic Interactionism and Beyond.Annual Review of Sociology 34: 1531.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Tadashi. 2001. “Frame Diffusion from the US to Japan: Japanese Arguments against Pornocomics, 1989–1992.” In Best, Joel (ed.), How Claims Spread: Cross-National Diffiusion of Social Problems (pp. 129–145). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham M., and Matza, David. 1957. “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency.” American Sociological Review 22(6): 664670.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, Frank. 1938. Crime and the Community. Boston, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Thoits, P. A. 1983. “Multiple Identities and Psychological Well-Being: A Reformulation of the Social Isolation Hypothesis.” American Sociological Review 48: 174187.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. I. 1923. The Unadjusted Girl. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. I., and Thomas, Dorothy Swaine. 1928. The Child in America. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. I., and Znaniecki, Florian. 1918–1920. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H. 2011. “Extending the Symbolic Interactionist Theory of Interaction Process: A Conceptual Outline.” Symbolic Interaction 34(3): 330339.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H., and Stets, Jan. 2006. “Sociological Theories of Human Emotions.” Annual Review of Sociology 32: 2552.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. 1997. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Karen G., and Colyer, Corey J.. 2010. “Roofies, Mickies and Cautionary Tales: Examining the Persistence of the ‘Date-Rape Drug’ Crime Narrative.” Deviant Behavior 31(4): 348379.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×