Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:40:01.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Weberian Social Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

By
Austin Harrington
Edited by
Peter Kivisto
Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

Max Weber’s influence on currents of thought over the past century has been profound and far-reaching. This chapter surveys four main areas of impact: the philosophy of the social sciences; class, economy, and rationalization; religion, culture, and social change; and power, politics, and the nation-state. A concluding section addresses the contemporary status of Weber’s thinking regarding the “rise of the West” and its place in world history.

Austin Harrington is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Leeds. His recent publications include German Cosmopolitan Social Thought and the Idea of the West: Voices from Weimar (Cambridge University Press, 2016) and Georg Simmel: Essays on Art and Aesthetics (University of Chicago Press, 2020).

Keywords

DisenchantmentpowerrationalizationreligionVerstehenWeber
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory , pp. 145 - 160
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (ed.). 1976 [1969]. The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. Translated by Adey, G. and Frisby, D.. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey. 1983. The Classical Attempt at Theoretical Synthesis: Max Weber. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Volume Three. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey.2003. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arjomand, Said Amir, and Tiryakian, Edward A. (eds.). 2004. Rethinking Civilizational Analysis. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1959. The Human Condition. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Arnason, Johann P. 2003. Civilizations in Dispute. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1968 [1936]. German Sociology. Translated by Bottomore, M. and Bottomore, T.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Baehr, Peter. 2008. Caesarism, Charisma and Fate: Historical Sources and Modern Resonances in the Work of Max Weber. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt.1991. Modernity and Ambivalence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens. 2002. Beyond the Market: The Social Foundations of Economic Efficiency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1976. The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N. 1985 [1957]. Tokugawa Religion: The Cultural Roots of Modern Japan. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N. 2011. Religion in Human Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert, and Joas, Hans, 2012. The Axial Age and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1964. Nation-Building and Citizenship: Studies of Our Changing Social Order. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1956. Bureaucracy in Modern Society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Chiapello, Eve. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Elliott, G.. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1972. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Nice, R.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre.1979. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Nice, R.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Breiner, Peter. 1996. Max Weber and Democratic Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Colin. 1987. The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James. 1991. The Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: HarvardGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1975. Conflict Sociology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall.1986. Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davie, Grace. 2000. Religion in Modern Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Gay, Paul. 2000. In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber – Organisation – Ethics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 2000. ‘Multiple Modernities.’ Daedalus 129(1) (Winter): 1–29.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., Schluchter, Wolfgang, and Wittrock, Bjorn. 2001. Public Spheres and Collective Identities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Esping-Anderson, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Factor, Regis, and Turner, Stephen. 1984. Max Weber and the Dispute over Reason and Value. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975 [1960]. Truth and Method. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony.1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffes, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goldman, Harvey. 1992. Max Weber and Thomas Mann: Calling and the Shaping of the Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip S. 2003. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin. 1971. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. ‘The Strength of Weak Ties.’ American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984–1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen.1991. ‘Heinrich Heine and the Role of the Intellectual in Germany.’ In The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate. Translated by Nicholson, S. Weber (pp. 71–99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall, John A. 1985. Powers and Liberties: The Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David (eds.). 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Austin. 2016. German Cosmopolitan Social Thought and the Idea of the West: Voices from Weimar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Austin, and Roberts, David. 2012. ‘Introduction: Weimar Social Theory: The “Crisis of Classical Modernity” Revisited.’ Thesis Eleven 111: 3–99.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor. 1972 [1944]. The Dialectic of Enlightenment. Translated by Cumming, J.. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 2017. Die Macht des Heiligen: Eine Alternative zur Geschichte von der Entzauberung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle. 1992. Money, Manners, and Morals: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Classes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lash, Scott, and Whimster, Sam. 1987. Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. 1982. Max Weber and Karl Marx. Translated by Bottomore, T. and Outhwaite., W. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. The Differentiation of Society. Translated by Holmes, S. and Larmore, C.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. 1980 [1952]. The Destruction of Reason. Translated by Palmer., P. London: The Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1979. ‘Power and Authority.’ In Bottomore, Tom and Nisbet, Robert (eds.), A History of Sociological Analysis (pp. 633–676). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1986–2013. The Sources of Social Power, 4 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. 1936. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. Translated by Wirth, Louis and Shils, Edward. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. 1998 [1848]. The Communist Manifesto. London: Verso.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 1963. The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1962 [1911, 1915]. Political Parties. Translated by Paul, Eden and Paul, Cedar. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Wolfgang J. 1974. The Age of Bureaucracy: Perspectives on the Political Sociology of Max Weber. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Wolfgang J. 1984 [1959]. Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920. Translated by Steinberg, M. S.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Wolfgang J. 1989. The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Owen, David. 1994. Maturity and Modernity: Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault and the Ambivalence of Reason. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and Shils, Edward A. (eds.). 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: Harper & Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peukert, Detlev. 1987. The Weimar Republic: The Crisis of Classical Modernity. Translated by Deveson, R.. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlev.1989. Max Webers Diagnose der Moderne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1957 [1944]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2000. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesman, David. 1950. The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ritzer, George. 2000. The McDonaldization of Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
Scaff, Lawrence A. 1989. Fleeing the Iron Cage: Culture, Politics, and Modernity in the Thought of Max Weber. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scaff, Lawrence A. 2012. Weber and the Weberians. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang. 1981. The Rise of Western Rationalism: Max Weber’s Developmental History. Translated by Roth, Guenther. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang.1989. Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective. Translated by Solomon, Neil. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1962. Collected Papers, vol. 1. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred.1967 [1932]. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Translated by Walsh, G. and Lehnert, F.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Sennett, Richard. 2000. The Corrosion of Character. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward A. 1981. Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swatos, William H., and Kaelber, Lutz (eds.). 2005. The Protestant Ethic Turns 100: Essays on the Centenary of the Weber Thesis. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 1991. Joseph A. Schumpeter. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Szakolczai, Arpád. 1998. Max Weber and Michel Foucault: Parallel Life-Works. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Scott D. 2012. Globalization and the Cultures of Business in Africa: From Patrimonialism to Profit. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2004. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Troeltsch, Ernst. 2018 [1922]. Historismus und seine Probleme. Sydney, Australia: Wentworth Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P. 2009. ‘Hans J. Morgenthau and the Legacy of Max Weber.’ In Bell, Duncan (ed.), Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme (pp. 63–82). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Eric. 1951. The New Science of Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1930. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Parsons, T.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max.1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Edited by Gerth, Hans and Wright Mills, C.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max.1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Edited by Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max.1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2012. Collected Methodological Writings. Edited by Bruun, H. H. and Whimster, Sam, Translated by Bruun, H. H.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whimster, Sam. 2007. Understanding Weber. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wong, Roy Bin. 1997. China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×