Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks In Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Theories and Approaches to Spanish Linguistics
- Part II The Spanish Sound System
- Part III Spanish Morphosyntax and Meaning
- Part IV Spanish in Social, Geographic, and Historical Contexts
- Part V The Acquisition of Spanish
- Index
- References
Part III - Spanish Morphosyntax and Meaning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks In Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Theories and Approaches to Spanish Linguistics
- Part II The Spanish Sound System
- Part III Spanish Morphosyntax and Meaning
- Part IV Spanish in Social, Geographic, and Historical Contexts
- Part V The Acquisition of Spanish
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics , pp. 259 - 456Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Alexeyenko, A. (2015). The Syntax and Semantics of Manner Modification: Adjectives and Adverbs (Doctoral dissertation). University of Osnabrück.Google Scholar
Ambadiang, T. and Camus Bergareche, B. (2000). Morfología verbal del español como L2. In Díaz Hormigo, María Tadea (ed.), IV Congreso de Lingüística General, Cádiz, del 3 al 6 de abril 2000, Vol. 2. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz, pp. 89–102.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. and Valera, S. (2005). Approaches to Conversion / Zero Derivation. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2007a). Morphological Structure and Phonological Domains in Spanish Denominal Derivation. In Martínez-Gil, F. and Colina, S. (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic studies in Spanish Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 278–311.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2007b). Spanish Pseudo-Plurals: Phonological Cues in the Acquisition of a Syntax–Morphology Mismatch. In Baerman, M. et al. (eds.), Deponency and Morphological Mismatches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–269.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2013). The Spanish Lexicon Stores Stems with Theme Vowels, not Roots with Inflectional Class Features. Probus, 25, 3–103.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2016). We Do Not Need Structuralist Morphemes, but We Do Need Constituent Structure. In Siddiqi, D. and Harley, Heidi (eds.), Morphological Metatheory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 387–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after Syntax. Pronominal Clitics in Romance (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Booij, G. (1996). Inherent vs. Contextual Inflection and the Split Morphology Hypothesis. In Booij, G. and van Maarle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (1999). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Buenafuentes de la Mata, C. (2007). Procesos de gramaticalización y lexicalización en la formación de compuestos en español (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Burdette, K. (2005). New Paradigms: A Rule-and-Feature Based Morpholexical Model of the Spanish Verbal System. In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 158–168.Google Scholar
Bustos Gisbert, E. (1986). La composición nominal en español. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Cabré, T. and Prieto, P. (2007). Exceptional Hiatuses in Spanish. In Martínez-Gil, F. and Colina, S. (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic studies in Spanish Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 205–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caha, P. (2009). The Nanosyntax of Case (Doctoral dissertation). CASTL, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Colina, S. (2003). Diminutives in Spanish: A Morphophonological Account. The Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 22, 87–107.Google Scholar
Company Company, C. (1998). The Interplay between Form and Meaning in Language Change: Grammaticalization of Cannibalistic Datives in Spanish. Studies in Language, 22, 529–566.Google Scholar
DiSciullo, A.-M. and Williams, E. (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Downing, P. (1977). On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns. Language, 53, 810–842.Google Scholar
Eddington, D. (2005). Spanish Verb Inflection: A Single- or Dual-Route System? Linguistics, 47, 173–199.Google Scholar
Eguren, L. (2002). Evaluative Suffixation in Spanish and the Syntax of Derivational Processes. In Herschensohn, J. et al. (eds.), Features and Interfaces in Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
Embick, D. (2010). Localism vs. Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2005). La definición de la categoría gramatical en una morfología orientada sintácticamente (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2013). Diminutives as Heads or Specifiers: The Mapping between Syntax and Phonology. Iberia, 5, 1–44.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2014). On a Grammatically Relevant Notion of Word and Why it Belongs to Syntax. In Ibarretxe, I. and Mendívil, J. L. (eds.), To Be or Not To Be a Word. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishers, pp. 93–131.Google Scholar
Felíu, E. and Roca, I. (2003). Morphology in Truncation: The Role of the Spanish Desinence. In Booij, G. and van Maarle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2002. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 197–218.Google Scholar
Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111–176.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1991). The Exponence of Gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 27–62.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. and Halle, M. (2005). Unexpected Plural Inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and Metathesis. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 195–222.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2011). The Indeterminacy of Word Segmentation and the Nature of Morphology and Syntax. Folia Linguistica, 45, 31–80.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1986). Three Issues in the Theory of Clitics: Case, Doubled NPs and Extraction. In Borer, H. (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. New York: Academic, pp. 15–42.Google Scholar
Julien, M. (2007). On the Relation between Morphology and Syntax. In Ramchand, G. and Reiss, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–238.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1975). French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martín García, J. (2001). Construcciones morfológicas y construcciones sintácticas: Los prefijos “anti-” y “pro-”. In Veiga, A. et al. (eds.), Lengua española y estructuras gramaticales. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, pp. 225–237.Google Scholar
Mateu, J. and Acedo-Matellán, V. (2015). Parameters and Argument Structure I: Motion Predicates and Resultatives. In Fábregas, A. et al. (eds.), Contemporary Linguistic Parameters. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 99–123.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional Morphology, a Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moina, M. I. (2011). Compound Words in Spanish: Theory and History. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Myler, N. (2015). Stem Storage? Not Proved: A Reply to Bermúdez-Otero 2013. Linguistic Inquiry, 46, 173–186.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, I. (1999). On the Constituent Structure of Catalan Verbs. In Arregi, K. et al. (eds.), Papers in Morphology and Syntax, Cycle One. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 279–322.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, I. and Arregi, K. (2005). Stress by Structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 43–84.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2012). Clitics in Spanish. In Hualde, J. I. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 423–453.Google Scholar
Ormazábal, J. and Romero, J. (2013). Object Clitics, Agreement and Dialectal Variation. Probus, 25, 301–344.Google Scholar
Pena, J. (1999). Partes de la morfología: Las unidades del análisis morfológico. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 4305–4366.Google Scholar
Piera, C. (1995). On Compounding in English and Spanish. In Campos, H. and Kempchinsky, P. (eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 302–315.Google Scholar
Piera, C. and Varela, S. (1999). Relaciones entre morfología y sintaxis. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 4367–4422.Google Scholar
Rainer, F. and Varela, S. (1992). Compounding in Spanish. Rivista di linguistica, 4, 117–142.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, L. (2002). Compuestos, colocaciones, locuciones: Intento de delimitación. In Veiga, A. et al. (eds.), Léxico y gramática. Lugo: Tris Tram, pp. 327–339.Google Scholar
Sanz, J. (2015). The Phonology and Morphology of Spanish Hypocoristics (Master’s Thesis). University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Scalise, S. and Bisetto, A. (2009). The Classification of Compounds. In Lieber, R. and Stekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 34–54.Google Scholar
Serrano Dolader, D. (2010). El género en los sustantivos: ¿flexión y / o derivación? In Val Álvaro, J. F. and Horno, M. C. (eds.), La gramática del sentido. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, pp. 249–269.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. (1995). Language Acquisition and Language Variation (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. (2012). Parameter Theory and Motion Predicates. In McNally, L. et al. (eds.), Telicity, Change and State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 279–300.Google Scholar
Son, M. and Svenonius, P. (2008). Microparameters of Cross-Linguistic Variation. In Abner, N. and Bishop, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 388–396.Google Scholar
Sportiche, D. (1996). Clitic Constructions. In Zaring, L. and Rooryck, J. (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 213–276.Google Scholar
Stump, G. (1998). Inflection. In Zwicky, A. and Spencer, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. London: Blackwell, pp. 13–43.Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. (2016). Spans and Words. In Siddiqi, Daniel and Harley, Heidi (eds.), Morphological Metatheory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 201–222.Google Scholar
Torner, S. (2003). De los adjetivos calificativos a los adverbios en -mente: Semántica y gramática. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the Syntax of Clitic Placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 79–124.Google Scholar
Zagona, K. (1990). Mente Adverbs, Compound Interpretation and the Projection Principle. Probus, 2, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel and Serrano, María José (2012). La posición del sujeto pronominal en las cláusulas no declarativas. Onomázein, 26 (2), 131–164.Google Scholar
Alba, Orlando (2004). Cómo hablamos los dominicanos: Un enfoque sociolingüístico. Santo Domingo: Grupo León Jiménez.Google Scholar
Alfaraz, Gabriela G. (2015). Variation of Overt and Null Subject Pronouns in the Spanish of Santo Domingo. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:3–16.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira (1994). Interpreting Anaphoric Expressions: A Cognitive versus a Pragmatic Approach. Journal of Linguistics, 30, 3–42.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert, Holland, Cory, and Ware, Kristen (2013). Lexical Frequency and Syntactic Variation: A Test of a Linguistic Hypothesis. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 19 (2), 21–30.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert and Pease-Álvarez, Lucinda (1996). Null and Expressed Pronoun Variation in Mexican-descent children’s Spanish. In Arnold, Jennifer, Blake, Renee, and Davidson, Brad (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 85–99.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola (1987). Los sujetos pronominales de primera persona en el habla de Caracas. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela, Consejo de Desarrollo Científico y Humanístico.Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. and Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The Persistence of Structural Priming: Transient Activation or Implicit Learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 129, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullock, Barbara E. and Toribio, Jacqueline Almeida (2007). Reconsidering Dominican Spanish: Data from the Rural Cibao. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 7 (2), 49–73.Google Scholar
Butt, John and Benjamin, Carmen (2004). A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard (1992). Pronominal and Null Subject Variation in Spanish: Constraints, Dialects, and Functional Compensation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania at Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard (1994). Ambiguous Agreement, Functional Compensation, and Nonspecific tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change, 5 (3), 305–334.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard (1995). The Scope and Limit of Switch Reference as a Constraint on Pronominal Subject Expression. Hispanic Linguistics, 6/7, 1–27.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard (1997). Accessibility Theory in a Variable Syntax of Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 29–67.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard and Flores-Ferrán, Nydia (2004). Preservation of Subject Expression across Regional Dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context, 1 (1), 41–65.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Ana M., Orozco, Rafael, and Lapidus Shin, Naomi (eds.) (2015). Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish. A Cross-Dialectal Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Brad (1996). “Pragmatic Weight” and Spanish Subject Pronouns: The Pragmatic and Discourse Uses of “tú” and “yo” in Spoken Madrid Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 26 (4), 543–565.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2002– ). Corpus del español; 100 million words, 1200s–1900s. Available from www.corpusdelespanol.orgGoogle Scholar
DeMello, George (2000). Tú impersonal en el habla culta. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica, 48 (2), 359–372.Google Scholar
de Prada Pérez, Ana (2015). First Person Singular Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish in Contact with Catalan. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:121–142.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. (2011). Expression of Pronominal Subjects. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, Chapter 101. Available from wals.info/chapter/101 (last access January 8, 2018).Google Scholar
Duarte Lamoglia, Maria Eugênia (2000). The Loss of the Avoid Pronoun Principle in Brazilian Portuguese. In Kato, M. A. and Negrão, E. V. (eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert Verlag, pp. 17–36.Google Scholar
Elinzaincín, Adolfo (1995). Personal Pronouns for Inanimate Entities in Uruguayan Spanish in Contact with Portuguese. In Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (ed.), Spanish in Four Continents: Studies in Language Contact and Bilingualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 117–131.Google Scholar
Enríquez, Emilia V. (1984). El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: Instituto Miguel de Cervantes.Google Scholar
Erker, Daniel and Guy, Gregory (2012). The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Variability: Variable Subject Personal Pronoun Expression in Spanish. Language, 88 (3), 526–557.Google Scholar
Fernández Soriano, Olga (1999). El pronombre personal. Formas y distribuciones. Pronombres átonos y tónicos. In Bosque, Ignacio and Demonte, Violeta (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Volumen 1: Sintaxis básica de las clases de palabras. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 1209–1273.Google Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia (2004). Spanish Subject Personal Pronoun Use in New York City Puerto Ricans: Can we Rest the Case of English Contact? Language Variation and Change, 16, 49–73.Google Scholar
Geeslin, Kimberly and Gudmestad, Aarnes (2016). Subject Expression in Spanish. Contrasts between Native and Non-Native Speakers for First- and Second-Person Singular Referents. Spanish in Context, 13 (1), 53–79.Google Scholar
Geeslin, Kimberly, Linford, Bret, and Fafulas, Stephen (2015). Variable Subject Expression in Second Language Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:191–209.Google Scholar
Gili y Gaya, Samuel (1964). Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Bibliograf.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1983). Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross Language Study. Typological Studies in Language 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Granda Gutiérrez, G. (1972). Transculturación e interferencia lingüística en el Puerto Rico contemporáneo (1898–1968). Puerto Rico: Editorial Edil.Google Scholar
Guirado, Kristel (2011). La alternancia tú~uno impersonal en el habla de Caracas. Revista de Lingüística, 26, 26–54.Google Scholar
Hochberg, Judith G. (1986). Functional Compensation for /s/ Deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language, 62 (3), 609–621.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Luz Marcela (2005). Condicionamientos sintáctico-semánticos de la expresión del sujeto en el español colombiano. Hispania, 88 (2), 335–348.Google Scholar
Kluge, Bettina (2010). El uso de formas de tratamiento en las estrategias de generalización. In Hummel, M., Kluge, B., and Laslop, M. E. Vázquez (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico. Mexico City: El Colegio de México, Graz: Karl-Franzens-Universität, pp. 1107–1136.Google Scholar
Lastra, Yolanda and Butragueño, Pedro Martín (2015). Subject Pronoun Expression in Oral Mexican Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:39–58.Google Scholar
Lapidus, Naomi and Otheguy, Ricardo (2005). Overt Nonspecific ellos in Spanish in New York. Spanish in Context, 2, 157–74.Google Scholar
Linford, Bret, Long, Avizia, Solon, Megan, and Geeslin, Kimberly (2016a). Measuring Lexical Frequency: Comparison Groups and Subject Expression in L2 Spanish. In Ortega, L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., and Uno, M. (eds.), The Usage-Based Study of Language Learning and Multilingualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 137–154.Google Scholar
Linford, Bret, Long, Avizia, Solon, Megan, Whatley, Melissa, and Geeslin, Kimberly (2016b). Lexical Frequency and Subject Expression in Native and Non-Native Spanish: A Closer Look at Independent and Mediating Effects. In Sessarego, F. and Tejedo, F. (eds.), Spanish Language and Sociolinguistic Analysis. Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 197–216.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M. (1996). Patterns of Pronominal Evolution in Cuban-American Bilinguals. In Roca, Ana and Jensen, John B. (eds.), Spanish in Contact: Issues in Bilingualism. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 159–86.Google Scholar
Martínez-Sanz, Cristina (2011). Null and Overt Subjects in a Variable System: The Case of Dominican Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Matos Amaral, Patrícia and Schwenter, Scott A. (2005). Contrast and the (Non-)Occurrence of Subject Pronouns. In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 116–127.Google Scholar
Meyer-Hermann, Reinhard (1990). Sobre algunas condiciones pragmáticas de la posición del sujeto en español. ELUA Estudios de Lingüística, 6, 73–88.Google Scholar
Michnowicz, Jim (2015). Subject Pronoun Expression in Contact with Maya in Yucatan Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:101–120.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina and Sánchez-Walker, Noelia (2015). Subject Expression in Bilingual School-Age Children in the United States. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:231–247.Google Scholar
Morales, Amparo (1989). Hacia un universal sintáctico del español del Caribe. El orden SVO. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica, 5, 139–152.Google Scholar
Morales, Amparo (1997). La hipótesis funcional y la aparición de sujeto no nominal: El español de Puerto Rico. Hispania, 80, 153–165.Google Scholar
Orozco, Rafael (2015). Pronominal Variation in Colombian Costeño Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:17–58.Google Scholar
Orozco, Rafael and Guy, Gregory (2008). El uso variable de los pronombres sujetos: ¿Qué pasa en la costa Caribe colombiana? In Westmoreland, M. and Thomas, J. A. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 70–80.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo and Zentella, Ana Celia (2012). Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialect, Levelling, and Structural Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo, Zentella, Ana Celia, and Livert, David (2007). Language and Dialect Contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the Formation of a Speech Community. Language, 83 (4), 770–802.Google Scholar
Pešková, Andrea (2015). Sujetos pronominales en el español porteño: Implicaciones pragmáticas en la interfaz sintáctico–fonológica. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Posio, Pekka (2011). Spanish Subject Pronoun Usage and Verb Semantics Revisited: First and Second Person Singular Subject Pronouns and Focusing of Attention in Spoken Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (3), 777–798.Google Scholar
Posio, Pekka (2012a). The Functions of Postverbal Pronominal Subjects in Spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 5 (1), 149–190.Google Scholar
Posio, Pekka (2012b). Who are “We” in Spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese? Expression and Reference of First Person Plural Subject Pronouns. Language Sciences, 34, 339–360.Google Scholar
Posio, Pekka (2014). Subject Expression in Grammaticalizing Constructions: The Case of creo and acho ‘I think’ in Spanish and Portuguese. Journal of Pragmatics, 63, 5–18.Google Scholar
Posio, Pekka (2015). Subject Pronoun Usage in Formulaic Sequences: Evidence from Peninsular Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:59–80.Google Scholar
Posio, Pekka (2016). You and We: Impersonal Second Person Singular and other Referential Devices in Spanish Sociolinguistic Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 99, 1–16.Google Scholar
Ramos, Miguel (2016). Continuity and Change. First Person Singular Subject Pronoun Expression in Earlier Spanish. Spanish in Context, 13 (1), 103–127.Google Scholar
Ranson, Diana (1991). Person Marking in the Wake of /s/ Deletion in Andalusian Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 3 (2), 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranson, Diana (2009). Variable Subject Expression in Old and Middle French Prose Texts: The Role of Verbal Ambiguity. Romance Quarterly, 56 (1), 33–45.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española (n.d.). Banco de datos (CREA) [en línea]. Corpus de referencia del español actual. www.rae.es.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Holmberg, Anders (2010). Introduction: Parameters in Minimalist Theory. In Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I., and Sheehan, M. (eds.), Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli (2004). A Comprehensive Semantics for Agreement. Paper presented at the Phi-Workshop, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. August 2004. Available from https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/year/2009/docId/11827 (last access December 30, 2017).Google Scholar
Seo, Seunghyun (2001). The Frequency of Null Subject in Russian, Polish, Czech, Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian: An Analysis according to Morphosyntactic Environments (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University.Google Scholar
Serrano, María José (2013). Variación sociosituacional de la colocación del sujeto pronominal en textos conversacionales. Spanish in Context, 10 (2), 261–283.Google Scholar
Serrano, María José and Aijón, Oliva, Miguel Ángel (2010). La posición variable del sujeto pronominal en relación con la cortesía interactiva. Pragmalingüística, 18, 170–204.Google Scholar
Serrano, María José and Aijón, Oliva, Miguel Ángel (2011). Syntactic Variation and Communicative Style. Language Sciences, 33, 138–153.Google Scholar
Shin, Naomi and Erker, Daniel (2015). The Emergence of Structured Variability in Morphosyntax. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:169–189.Google Scholar
Shin, Naomi and Otheguy, Ricardo (2013). Social Class and Gender Impacting Change in Bilingual Settings: Spanish Subject Pronoun Use in New York. Language in Society, 42, 429–452.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (1982). Subject Expression and Placement in Mexican-American Spanish. In Amaste, J. and Olivares, E. (eds.), Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic Aspects. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–120.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (1997). Variación sintáctica en el discurso oral: Problemas metodológicos. In Moreno-Fernández, F. (ed.), Trabajos de sociolingüística hispánica. Alcalá de Henares: University of Alcalá, pp. 115–135.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (2001). Sociolingüística y pragmática del español. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Mulac, Anthony (1991). A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 313–339.Google Scholar
Toribio, A. Jacqueline. (2000). Setting Parametric Limits on Dialectal Variation in Spanish. Lingua, 110, 315–341.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena and Travis, Catherine E. (2011). Using Structural Variability to Evaluate Convergence via Code-Switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 241–267.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena and Travis, Catherine E. (2016). Two Languages, One Effect: Structural Priming in Spontaneous Code-Switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19 (4), 733–753.Google Scholar
Travis, Catherine E. (2007). Genre Effects on Subject Expression in Spanish: Priming in Narrative and Conversation. Language Variation and Change, 19 (2), 101–135.Google Scholar
Travis, Catherine E. and Torres Cacoullos, Rena (2012). What Do Subject Pronouns Do in Discourse? Cognitive, Mechanical and Constructional Factors in Variation. Cognitive Linguistics, 23 (4), 711–748.Google Scholar
References
Aelbrecht, L. (2016). What Ellipsis Can Do for Phases and What it Can’t, but not How. The Linguistic Review, 33 (2), 453–482.Google Scholar
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21 (3), 435–483.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. (2007). Post-Verbal Nominatives: An Unaccusativity Diagnostic under Scrutiny. Talk at On Linguistic Interfaces (OnLI) Workshop, University of Ulster.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 491–539.Google Scholar
Armstrong, G. (2016). Spanish Unspecified Objects as Null Incorporated Nouns. Probus, 28 (2), 165–229.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1997). Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 73–137.Google Scholar
Bassa Vanrell, M. del M. and Romeu, J. (2014). A Minimal Cartography of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Iberia, 6, 75–104.Google Scholar
Beavers, J. and Nishida, C. (2010). The Spanish Dative Alternation Revisited. In Colina, S., Olarrea, A., and Carvalho, A. M. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2009: Selected Papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 217–230.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. (1990). Generalized Verb Movement: Aspects of Verb Syntax. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych Verbs and a-Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6 (3), 291–352.Google Scholar
Benedicto, E. (1998). Verb Movement and its Effects on Determinerless Plural Subjects. In Schwegler, A., Tranel, B., and Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (eds.), Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Bleam, T. (2003). Properties of the Double Object Construction in Spanish. In Núñez-Cedeño, R., López, L., and Cameron, R. (eds.), A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 233–252.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. and Wurmbrand, S. (2013). Suspension across Domains. In Matushansky, O. and Marantz, A. (eds.), Distributed Morphology Today – Morphemes for Morris Halle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 185–198.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2014). Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 45 (1), 27–89.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (1994). La negación y el principio de las categorías vacías. In Demonte, V. (ed.), Gramática del español. Mexico City: El Colegio de México, pp. 167–199.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. and Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2009). Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Casielles-Suárez, E. (2004). The Syntax–Information Structure Interface. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by Phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1986). Spanish Bare NPs and the ECP. In Bordelois, I. and Zagona, K. (eds.), Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 25–49.Google Scholar
Depiante, M. A. (2000). The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora: A Study of Null Complement Anaphora and Stripping/Bare Argument Ellipsis (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. (1978). The Verbal Complex V’–V in French. Linguistic Inquiry, 9 (2), 151–175.Google Scholar
Espinal, M. T. (2000). On the Semantic Status of N-Words in Catalan and Spanish. Lingua, 110 (8), 557–580.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2013). Differential Object Marking in Spanish: State of the Art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2 (2), 1–80.Google Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, O. (1999). Two Types of Impersonal Sentences in Spanish: Locative and Dative Subjects. Syntax, 2 (2), 101–140.Google Scholar
Folli, R. (2001). Constructing Telicity in English and Italian (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Franco, J. (1992). Towards a Typology of Psych Verbs: Evidence from Spanish. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo”, 27, 119–134.Google Scholar
Gallego, Á. (2007). Phase Theory and Parametric Variation (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Gallego, Á. (2009). Ellipsis by Phase. Talk at the XIX Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. Available from http://filcat.uab.cat/clt/membres/professors/gallego/pdf/GAL_vitoria.pdf (last access November 24, 2017).Google Scholar
Gallego, Á. (2015). Subjunctive Dependents in Iberian Romance: A Reprojection Account. Sintagma, 27, 25–42.Google Scholar
Gallego, Á. and Uriagereka, J. (2007). Conditions on Sub-Extraction. In Eguren, L. and Fernández Soriano, O. (eds.), Coreference, Modality, and Focus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45–70.Google Scholar
González López, V. (2008). Spanish Clitic Climbing (Doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Goodall, G. (2001). The EPP in Spanish. In Davies, W. D. and Dubinsky, S. (eds.), Objects and Other Subjects: Grammatical Functions, Functional Categories and Configurationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 193–223.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. and Lipták, A. (2014). Contrast and Island Sensitivity in Clausal Ellipsis. Syntax, 17 (3), 189–234.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, R. (2006). A Reinterpretation of Quirky Subjects and Related Phenomena in Spanish. In Montreuil, J. P. and Nishida, C. (eds.), New Perspectives in Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. and Zanuttini, R. (1991). Negative Heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review, 8 (2–4), 233–251.Google Scholar
Hale, K. L. and Keyser, S. J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hankamer, J. and Sag, I. (1976). Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7 (3), 391–426.Google Scholar
Harley, H. (2003). Possession and the Double Object Construction. In Pica, P. and Rooryck, J. (eds.), Linguistics Variation Yearbook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 231–270.Google Scholar
Harley, H. (2011). A Minimalist Approach to Argument Structure. In Boeckx, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 427–448.Google Scholar
Herburger, E. (2001). The Negative Concord Puzzle Revisited. Natural Language Semantics, 9 (3), 289–333.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. L. (1999). El infinitivo. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 3. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 2197–2356.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1986). Arbitrary Plural Nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4 (1), 43–76.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. (2009). On the Composite Nature of Subject Islands: A Phase-Based Approach. Sky Journal of Linguistics, 22, 91–138.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. (2015). Towards a Typology of Focus: Subject Position and Microvariation at the Discourse–Syntax Interface. Ampersand: An International Journal of General and Applied Linguistics, 2, 49–60.Google Scholar
Jurka, J. (2009). Gradient Acceptability and Subject Islands in German (Qualifying Paper). University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, A. (2009). The Syntax of Sentential Stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1981). Unambiguous Paths. In May, R. and Koster, J. (eds.), Levels of Syntactic Representation. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 143–183.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (2006). On Parameters and on Principles of Pronunciation. In Broekhuis, H., Corver, N., Huybregts, R., Kleinhenz, U., and Koster, J. (eds.), Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 289–299.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2009). What Can the Subjunctive Disjoint Reference Effect Tell Us about the Subjunctive? Lingua, 119 (12), 1788–1810.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H. (2006). La teoría de pro y el sujeto pre / postverbal. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Klima, E. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor, J. A. and Katz, J. J. (eds.), The Structure of Language. Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 246–323.Google Scholar
Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D. (1991). The Position of Subjects. Lingua, 85 (2–3), 211–258.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the External Argument from its Verb. In Rooryck, J. and Zaring, L. (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 109–137.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, W. (1992). Expressing Negation. In Barker, C. and Dowty, D. (eds.), Proceedings of SALT II. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, pp. 237–259.Google Scholar
Laka, I. (1990). Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Larson, R. K. (1988). On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19 (3), 335–391.Google Scholar
López, L. (2009). A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
López, L. (2012). Indefinite Objects. Scrambling, Choice Functions and Differential Marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1997). No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4 (2), 201–225.Google Scholar
Masullo, P. (1992). Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.Google Scholar
Mateu, J. (2002). Argument Structure: Relational Construal at the Syntax–Semantics Interface (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Mateu, J. and Rigau, G. (2002). A Minimalist Account of Conflation Processes: Parametric Variation at the Lexicon–Syntax Interface. In Alexiadou, A. (ed.), Theoretical Approaches to Universals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 211–236.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, A. (1999). Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. Bosque, In I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 2. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 1575–1631.Google Scholar
Merchant, J. (2001). The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, J. (2004). Fragments and Ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27 (6), 661–738.Google Scholar
Nakao, C. (2009). Island Repair and Non-Repair by PF Strategies (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Oehrle, R. (1976). The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Olarrea, A. (1996). Pre- and Postverbal Subject Positions in Spanish: A Minimalist Account (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2000). The Clausal Structure of Spanish: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ormazábal, J. and Romero, J. (2010). The Derivation of Dative Alternations. In Duguine, M., Huidobro, S., and Madariaga, N. (eds.), Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 203–232.Google Scholar
Ormazábal, J. and Romero, J. (2013). Object Clitics, Agreement and Dialectal Variation. Probus, 25 (2), 301–344.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2016). On Focus-Related Operation at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ott, D. and Struckmeier, V. (2016). Deletion in Clausal Ellipsis: Remnants in the Middle Field. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 22 (1), 225–234.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Jaeger, J. J., Woodbury, A. C., Ackerman, F., Chiarello, C., Gensler, O. D., Kingston, J., Sweetser, E. E., Thompson, H., and Whistler, K. W. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 157–189.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pineda, A. (2013). Romance Double Object Constructions and Transitivity Alternations. In Boone, E., Kohlberger, M., and Schulpen, M. (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE XX. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, pp. 185–211.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20 (3), 365–424.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovan, M. and Levin, B. (2008). The English Dative Alternation: The Case for Verb Sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics, 44 (1), 129–167.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. and Siloni, T. (2005). The Lexicon–Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations. Linguistic Inquiry, 36 (3), 389–436.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1986). Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of Pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17 (4), 501–557.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Mondoñedo, M. (2007). The Syntax of Objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Romero, J. (1997). Construcciones de doble objeto y gramática universal (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Saab, A. (2008). Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Schäfer, F. (2009). The Causative Alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3 (2), 641–681.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. (2000). An Experimental Investigation of Syntactic Satiation Effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 31 (4), 575–582.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. (2001). On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word Formation. Language, 77 (2), 324–342.Google Scholar
Sprouse, J. (2007). A Program for Experimental Syntax: Finding the Relationship between Acceptability and Grammatical Knowledge (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Sprouse, J., Schütze, C., and Almeida, D. (2013). A Comparison of Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments using a Random Sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–248.Google Scholar
Stepanov, A. (2001). Cyclic Domains in Syntactic Theory (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Suñer, M. (1995). Negative Elements, Island Effects and Resumptive no. The Linguistic Review, 12 (3), 233–373.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1989). Unergative Unaccusative Alternations. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 253–272.Google Scholar
Travis, L. (1984). Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Tubau, S. (2008). Negative Concord in English and Romance: Syntax–Morphology Interface Conditions on the Expression of Negation (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1999). Multiple Spell-Out. In Epstein, S. and Hornstein, N. (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 251–282.Google Scholar
Valmala, V. (2008). Topic, Focus and Quantifier Float. In Beaskoetxea, X. Artiagoitia and Andrinua, J. Lakarra (eds.), Gramatika jaietan: Patxi Goenagaren omenez. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 837–857.Google Scholar
Wilinski-Hodel, M. (2007). Comportamiento semántico-pronominal de los verbos psicológicos que presentan la alternancia dativa/acusativa (MA Thesis). University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Yoshida, M., Nakao, C., and Ortega-Santos, I. (2014). Ellipsis. In Carnie, A., Sato, Y., and Siddiqi, D. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Syntax. London: Routledge, pp. 192–213.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, R. (1991). Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. and Oh, E. (2007). On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
References
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parameterizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 491–539.Google Scholar
Ambadiang, T. (2016). Flexión verbal. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica. London: Routledge, pp. 584–594.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1985). The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, 16 (3), 373–415.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P. (2001). On Inversion in wh-Questions in Romance. In Aafke, C., Hulk, J., and Pollock, J.-Y. (eds.), Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 20–59.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P. (2013). Partial Pro-Drop as Null NP Anaphora. In Fainleib, Yelena and LaCara, Nicholas (eds.), NELS 41: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting [2010] of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 1. Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 71–84.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. (1999). ‘Inversion’ as Focalization and Related Questions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 9–45.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. and Wurmbrand, S. (2005). The Domain of Agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 809–865.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2007). On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 589–644.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. and Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2009). Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Camacho, J. (2000). Structural Restrictions on Comitative Coordination. Linguistic Inquiry, 31 (2), 366–375.Google Scholar
Camacho, J. (2006). Do Subjects Have a Place in Spanish? In Montreuil, J.-P. and Nishida, C. (eds.), New Perspectives in Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 51–56.Google Scholar
Camacho, J. and Sánchez, L. (2014). Does the Verb Raise to T in Spanish? (MS). Rutgers University. Available from http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~jcamacho/publications/adverbs-mono.pdf (last access November 25, 2017).Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. (1996). Subjects and Clause Structure. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 55–95.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. (2004). Toward a Cartography of Subject Positions. In Rizzi, L. (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 115–165.Google Scholar
Casielles, E. (2001). The Syntax and Semantics of Preverbal Topical Phrases in Spanish. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. and Silva-Villar, L. (eds.), Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89–155.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by Phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. In Belletti, A. (ed.), Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 104–131.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2008). On Phases. In Freidin, R., Otero, C., and Zubizarreta, M. L. (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 133–166.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, R. (2016). Syntactic agreement. Course materials, Eastern Generative Grammar (EGG) Summer School. Available from http://www.eggschool.org/earlier-schools/egg-2016-tbilisi-georgia/classes-egg16/dalessandro-syntactic-agreement/ (last access November 25, 2017).Google Scholar
Emonds, J. (1978). The Verbal Complex Vʹ–V in French. Linguistic Inquiry, 9 (2), 151–175.Google Scholar
Etxepare, R. and Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2008). On Negation and Focus in Spanish and Basque. In Beaskoetxea, X. Artiagoitia and Andrinua, J. Lakarra (eds.), Gramatika jaietan: Patxi Goenagaren omenez. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 287–310.Google Scholar
Gallego, Á. (2007). Phase Theory and Parametric Variation (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Goodall, G. (2001). The EPP in Spanish. In Davies, W. D. and Dubinsky, S. (eds.), Objects and Other Subjects: Grammatical Functions, Functional Categories and Configurationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 193–223.Google Scholar
Gupton, T. (2014). Preverbal Subjects in Galician: Experimental Data in the A vs. Ā Debate. Probus, 26, 135–175.Google Scholar
Hill, V. (1991). Theoretical Implications of Complementation in Romanian (Doctoral dissertation). Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, K. (2001). Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese. In Matushansky, O. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st HUMIT Student Conference in Linguistic Research (HUMIT 2000). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2005). Is There a Little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 533–564.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. and Miyagawa, S. (2014). A Feature-Inheritance Approach to Root Phenomena and Parametric Variation. Lingua, 145, 276–302.Google Scholar
Koeneman, O. and Zeijlstra, H. (2014). The Rich Agreement Hypothesis Rehabilitated. Linguistic Inquiry, 45 (4), 571–615.Google Scholar
Laka, I. (1990). Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
López, L. (2007). Locality and the Architecture of Syntactic Dependencies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
López, L. (2009). A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martínez, J. A. (1999). La concordancia. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Nueva gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 2695–2784.Google Scholar
Masullo, P. (1992). Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.Google Scholar
Ojea, A. (2017). Core-Intentional Features in the Syntactic Computation: Deriving the Position of the Subject in Spanish. Lingua, 195, 72–92. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.06.007.Google Scholar
Olarrea, A. (1996). Pre- and Postverbal Subjects in Spanish: A Minimalist Account (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, I. (1999). On the Constituent Structure of Catalan Verbs. In Arregi, K., Bruening, B., Krause, C., and Lin, V. (eds.), Papers in Morphology and Syntax, Cycle One. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 279–322.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, I. (2000). On the Notion of “Theme Vowel”: A New Approach to Catalan Verbal Morphology. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 19.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (1997). Word Order and Clausal Structure of Spanish and Other Romance Languages (Doctoral dissertation). City University of New York.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2000). The Clausal Structure of Spanish: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2005). Two Specs for Postverbal Subjects: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan (MS). SUNY.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2016). Sujetos. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica. London: Routledge, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. and Treviño, E. (1999). Left Dislocated Subjects and the Pro-Drop Parameter: A Case Study of Spanish. Lingua, 107, 39–68.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2006a). On Locative Inversion and the EPP in Spanish. In Ciscomani, Rosa María Ortiz (ed.), Memoria del VIII Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste, Vol. 2. Hermosillo: Unison, pp. 131–150.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2006b). On New Information Focus, Sentence Stress Assignment Conditions and the Copy Theory: A Spanish Conspiracy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 188–212.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2016). Focus-Related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. and Villa-García, J. (in preparation). Evidence for an Active EPP in Spanish (MS). University of Memphis and University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Parafita Couto, M. C. (2005). Focus at the Interface (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Pérez Saldanya, M. (2012). Morphological Structure of Verbal Forms. In Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., and O’Rourke, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Spanish Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 227–246.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2001). T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 355–426.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20 (3), 365–424.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2007). The Syntax of Objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Saab, A. (2007). Anti-agreement and null subjects in Spanish: A distributed morphology approach. Handout from IV Encuentro de Gramática Generativa.Google Scholar
Saab, A. (2009). Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M. (2016). Subjects, Null Subjects and Expletives in Romance. In Fischer, S. and Gabriel, C. (eds.), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp. 329–362.Google Scholar
Stjepanović, S. (1999). What do Second Position Cliticization, Scrambling, and Multiple Wh-Fronting Have in Common? (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Suñer, M. (2003). The Lexical Preverbal Subject in a Romance Null Subject Language: Where Art Thou? In Núñez-Cedeño, R. et al. (eds.), A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 341–357.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. (1993). Subject/Verb-Agreement in Celtic and Romance. In Schafer, Amy J. (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 23, University of Ottawa, Vol. 1. Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 495–504.Google Scholar
Ticio, M. E. (2004). On the Position of Subjects in Puerto Rican Spanish. In Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. and Ticio, M. E. (eds.), Cranberry Linguistics 2. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 12. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
Tomioka, S. (2003). The Semantics of Japanese Null Pronouns and its Cross-Linguistic Implications. In Schwabe, K. and Winkler, S. (eds.), The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 321–340.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1984). On Inversion in Spanish and Some of Its Effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 103–129.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (2014). The Syntax of φ-Features: 1st and 2nd Person Agreement with Plural DPs (MS). University of MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E. and Laka, I. (2015). The Syntax of φ-Features: Agreement with Plural DPs in Basque and Spanish. In Fernández, B. and Salaburu, P. (eds.), Ibon Sarasola, Gorazarre. Homenatge, Homenaje. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 633–646.Google Scholar
Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (1991). On the Structural Positions of the Subjects in Spanish, their Nature and their Consequences for Quantification (MS). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Villa-García, J. (2010). To Agree or Not to Agree: Beyond Quintessentially Syntactic Agreement in Spanish. In Colina, S., Olarrea, A., and Carvalho, A. M. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2009. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 249–266.Google Scholar
Villa-García, J. (2015). The Syntax of Multiple-que Sentences in Spanish: Along the Left Periphery. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Villa-García, J. and Suárez-Palma, I. (2016). Early Null and Overt Subjects in the Spanish of Simultaneous English–Spanish Bilinguals and Crosslinguistic Influence. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29 (2), 350–395.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, H. (2012). There is Only One Way to Agree. The Linguistic Review, 29 (3), 491–539.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1999). Word Order in Spanish and the Nature of Nominative Case. In Johnson, K. and Roberts, I. (eds.), Beyond Principles and Parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 223–250.Google Scholar
References
Abney, S. P. (1987). The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Stavrou, M., and Haegeman, L. (2007). Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ambadiang, T. (1999). La flexión nominal. Género y número. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 4843–4913.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. B. (1993). Topics in the Syntax of Nominal Structure across Languages (Doctoral dissertation). CUNY.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. B. (2001). Focusing the “Right” Way in Romance Determiner Phrases. Probus, 13 (1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2012). On NPs and Clauses. In Grewendorf, G. and Zimmermann, T. E. (eds.), Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 179−242.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (ed.). (1996). El sustantivo sin determinación. La ausencia de determinante en la lengua española. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Casielles, E. (2004). The Syntax–Information Structure Interface. Evidence from Spanish and English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to Kinds across Languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1994). On the Evidence for Partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L., and Zanuttini, R. (eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (2010). The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (2014). The Semantic Classification of Adjectives. A View from Syntax. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 25 (1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. (2010). The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. In Heine, B. and Narrog, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1996). Sobre la distribución de los sintagmas nominales no predicativos sin determinante. In Bosque, 1996: 141–168.Google Scholar
Demonte, V. (1999). A Minimal Account of Spanish Adjective Position and Interpretation. In Franco, J., Landa, A., and Martín, J. (eds.), Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45–75.Google Scholar
Durrlemann, S. (2015). Nominal Architecture in Jamaican Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 30 (2) (2015), 265–306.Google Scholar
Eguren, L. (1989). Algunos datos del español en favor de la hipótesis de la frase determinante. Revista Argentina de Lingüística, 5 (1/2), 163–209.Google Scholar
Eguren, L. (2010). Contrastive Focus and Nominal Ellipsis in Spanish. Lingua, 120 (2), 435–457.Google Scholar
Espinal, M. T. (2009). Bare Nominals in Catalan and Spanish. Their Structure and Meaning. Lingua, 120, 984–1009.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2010). A Syntactic Account of Affix Rivalry in Spanish Nominalisations. In Alexiadou, A. and Rathert, M. (eds.), The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 67–90.Google Scholar
Gil, J. M. (2016) A Relational Account of the Spanish Noun Phrase. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 36 (1), 22–51.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra and Longobardi, Giuseppe (1991). The Syntax of Noun Phrases. Configuration, Parameters and Empty Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. and Mallén, E. (2002). Toward a Unified Analysis of Prenominal Adjectives. In Lee, James F., Geeslin, Kimberly L., and Clements, J. Clancy (eds.), Structure, Meaning, and Acquisition in Spanish. Papers from the 4th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 178–192.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1991). The Exponence of Gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22 (1), 27.Google Scholar
Ihsane, T. (2008). The Layered DP: Form and Meaning of French Indefinites. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Laca, B. (1996). Acerca de la semántica de los plurales escuetos del español. In Bosque, 1996: pp. 241–268.Google Scholar
Laenzlinger, C. (2005). French Adjective Ordering: Perspectives on DP-Internal Movement Types. Lingua, 115 (5), 645–689.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2013). Information Structure and the Distribution of Spanish Bare Plurals. In Kabatek, J. and Wall, A. (eds.), Bare Noun Phrases in Romance: Theory and (Empirical) Data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121–155.Google Scholar
Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference and Proper Names. Linguistic Inquiry, 25 (4), 609–665.Google Scholar
Martí, L. (2008). The Semantics of Plural Indefinite Noun Phrases in Spanish and Portuguese. Natural Language Semantics, 16 (1), 1–37.Google Scholar
McNally, L. (2004). Bare Plurals in Spanish are Interpreted as Properties. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 115–133.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., and Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender Agreement in Adult Second Language Learners and Spanish Heritage Speakers: The Effects of Age and Context of Acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9922.2008.00449.xGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A na T., Munn, Alan, Schmitt, Cristina, and DeIrish, Michelle. (2004a). Learning Definite Determiners: Genericity and Definiteness in English and Spanish. In Brugos, Alejna, Micciulla, Linnea, and Smith, Christine E. (eds.), Online Proceedings Supplement of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla. Available at http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2011/05/28-perez-leroux.pdf (accessed February 2, 2018).Google Scholar
Saab, A. (2009). Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Saab, A. (2010) (Im)possible Deletions in the Spanish DP. Iberia. An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2 (2), 45–83.Google Scholar
Sánchez, L. (1996). Syntactic Structure in Nominals: A Comparative Study of Spanish and Southern Quechua (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Socarrás, G. (2011). First Language Acquisition in Spanish: A Minimalist Approach to Nominal Agreement. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. (1984). The Possessor that Ran Away from Home. The Linguistic Review, 3, 89–102.Google Scholar
Ticio, M. E. (2005). NP-Ellipsis in Spanish. In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Colloquium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 128–141.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1987). On Empty Categories in Nominals (MS). University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
van Eynde, F. (2006). NP-Internal Agreement and the Structure of the Noun Phrase. Journal of Linguistics, 42, 139–186.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J. and Zubizarreta, M. L. (1992). The Definite Determiner and the Inalienable Constructions in French and in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 595–652.Google Scholar
References
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP-Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 491–539.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E., Díaz-Campos, M., McGory, J. T., and Morgan, T. A. (2002). Intonation across Spanish in the Tones and Break Indices Framework. Probus, 14, 9–36.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1972). Accent is Predictable (If You Are a Mind Reader). Lingua, 48, 633–644.Google Scholar
Brunetti, L. (2004). A Unification of Focus (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florence.Google Scholar
Buitrago, N. (2013). Types of Focus in Spanish: Exploring the Connection between Function and Realization (Doctoral dissertation). Cornell University.Google Scholar
Büring, D. (1997). The Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Street Bridge Accent. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Büring, D. and Gutiérrez-Bravo, R. (2001). Focus-Related Word Order Variation without the NSR: A Prosody Based Cross-Linguistic Analysis. In Bhloscaidh, Séamas Mac (ed.), Syntax and Semantics at Santa Cruz, Vol. 3. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center, University of California, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Cabrera-Puche, M. J. (2008). Null Subject Patterns in Language Contact: The Case of Dominican Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Casielles-Suárez, E. (2004). The Syntax–Information Structure Interface: Evidence from Spanish and English. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics and Point of View In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York Academic Press, pp. 27–55.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation. In Steinberg, D. D. and Jakobovits, L. A. (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–216.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 1–56.Google Scholar
Chung, H. (2012). Two Types of Focus in Castilian Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1993). A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 239–267.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1980). Sentential Stress, Word Order, and the Notion of Subject in Spanish. In Waugh, L. R. and van Schooneveld, C. H. (eds.), The Melody of Language: Intonation and Prosody. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1991). On the Position of Subjects. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing. San Diego, CA and London: Academic Press, pp. 63–79.Google Scholar
Costa, J. (2004). Subject Positions and Interfaces. The Case of European Portuguese. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L. (2004a). Mapping Focus: The Syntax and Prosody of Focus in Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). Boston University.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L. (2004b). The Effects of Phonological Cues on the Syntax of Focus Constructions in Spanish. In Bok-Bennema, R., Hollebrandse, B., Kampers-Manhe, B., and Sleeman, P. (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–81.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L. (2013). Understanding Interfaces: Second Language Acquisition and Native Language Attrition of Spanish Subject Realization and Word Order Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, K. (1998). Identificational Focus versus Information Focus. Language, 74, 245–273.Google Scholar
Etxepare, R. and Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2008). On Negation and Focus in Spanish and Basque. In Artiagoitia Beaskoetxea, X. and Lakarra Andrinua, J. (eds.), Gramatika jaietan: Patxi Goenagaren omenez. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 287–310.Google Scholar
Face, T. (2002). Local Intonational Marking of Spanish Contrastive Focus. Probus, 14, 71–92.Google Scholar
Fant, L. (1984). Estructura informativa en español. Estudio sintáctico y entonativo. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Feldhausen, I. (2016). The Relation between Prosody and Syntax: The Case of Different Types of Left-Dislocations in Spanish. In Armstrong, M. E., Hendriksen, N., and Vanrell, M. D. M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 153–180.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C. (2006). Focal Pitch Accents and Subject Positions in Spanish: Comparing Close-to-Standard Varieties and Argentinean Porteño. In Hoffmann, R. and Mixdorff, H. (eds.), Speech Prosody 2006. Dresden: TUD Press. Available from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.387.6737&rep=rep1&type=pdf (last access January 10, 2018).Google Scholar
Gabriel, C. (2010). On Focus, Prosody, and Word Order in Argentinean Spanish: A Minimalist OT account. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, 4, 183–222.Google Scholar
Garrido, J. M., Llisterri, J., de la Mota, C., and Ríos, A. (1993). Prosodic Differences in Reading Style: Isolated vs. Contextualized Sentences. EUROSPEECH’ 93, pp. 573–576. Available from www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech_1993/e93_0573.html (last access January 8, 2018).Google Scholar
Gupton, T. and Leal Méndez, T. (2013). Experimental Methodologies: Two Case Studies Investigating the Syntax–Discourse Interface. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 6 (1), 139–164.Google Scholar
Hoot, B. (2012). Narrow Focus on Pre-Nominal Modifiers in Spanish: An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis. In Geeslin, K. and Díaz-Campos, M. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 293–307.Google Scholar
Hoot, B. (2016). Narrow Presentational Focus in Mexican Spanish: Experimental Evidence. Probus, 28 (2), 335–365.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. and Gupton, T. (2009). The Role of Quantitative Data Collection in Theoretical Syntax. Paper Presented at the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Universidad de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leal, T., Destruel, E., and Hoot, B. (2017). The Realization of Information Focus in Monolingual and Bilingual Native Spanish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. doi: 10.1075/lab.16009.leaGoogle Scholar
López, L. (2009). A Derivational Syntax of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
López-Cortina, J. (2007). The Spanish Left Periphery: Questions and Answers (Doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Martínez-Sanz, C. (2011). Null and Overt Subjects in a Variable System: The Case of Dominican Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Mayol, L. (2012). An Account of the Variation in the Rates of Overt Subject Pronouns in Romance. Spanish in Context, 9 (3), 420–442.Google Scholar
Muntendam, A. (2009). Linguistic Transfer in Andean Spanish: Syntax or Pragmatics? (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Muntendam, A. and Torreira, F. (2016). Focus and Prosody in Spanish and Quechua: Insights from an Interactive Task. In Armstrong, M. E., Hendriksen, N., and Vanrell, M. D. M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
Neeleman, A. and Reinhart, T. (1998). Scrambling and the PF Interface. In Butt, M. and Geuder, W. (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 309–353.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (2003). Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage. Language, 79 (4), 682–707.Google Scholar
Olarrea, A. (2012). Word Order and Information Structure. In Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., and O’Rourke, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 603–628.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (1997). Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages (Doctoral dissertation). CUNY.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (1998). Postverbal Asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (2), 313–346.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2000). The Clausal Structure of Spanish: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. and Treviño, E. (1999). Left Dislocated Subjects and the Pro-Drop Parameter: A Case Study of Spanish. Lingua, 107 (1), 39–68.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2008). Projecting Subjects in Spanish and English (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2013). Corrective Focus at the Right Edge in Spanish. Lingua, 131, 112–135.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2016). Focus-Related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ortiz López, L. A. (2010). El español del Caribe: Orden de palabras a la luz de la interfaz léxico-sintáctica y sintácticopragmática. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 14, 75–93.Google Scholar
Penke, M. and Rosenbach, A. (2007). What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics: The Case of Innateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., Chilin, S., and Nibert, H. (1995). Pitch Downtrend in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 445–473.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1997). Interface Economy: Focus and Markedness. In Gärtner, H. M., Wilder, C., and Bierwisch, M. (eds.), The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 146–169.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface Strategies: Reference-Set Computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with Focus (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Rooth, M. (1992). A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75–116.Google Scholar
Rooth, M. (1996). Focus. In Lappin, S. (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 271–297.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1996). From Central Embedding to Empirical Linguistics. In Thomas, J. and Short, M. (eds.), Using Corpora for Language Research: Studies in Honor of Geoffrey Leech. London: Longman, pp. 14–26.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1986). On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371–405.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1995). Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress, and Phrasing. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), The Handbook of Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 550–569.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (2005). Comments on Intonational Phrasing in English. In Frota, S., Vigario, M., and Freitas, M.-J. (eds.), Prosodies. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 11–58.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M. (2006). The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance (Doctoral dissertation). University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Sosa, J. M. (1995). Nuclear and Pre-Nuclear Tonal Inventories and the Phonology of Spanish Declarative Intonation. In Elenius, K. and Branderand, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 4. Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University, pp. 646–649.Google Scholar
Suñer, M. (1994). V-Movement and the Licensing of Argumental Wh-Phrases in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, 335–372.Google Scholar
Szendrői, K. (2001). Focus and the Syntax–Phonology Interface (Doctoral dissertation). University College London.Google Scholar
Szendrői, K. (2003). A Stress-Based Approach to the Syntax of Hungarian Focus. The Linguistic Review, 20 (1), 37–78.Google Scholar
Szendrői, K. (2004). Focus and the Interaction between Syntax and Pragmatics. Lingua, 114, 229–254.Google Scholar
Ticio, M. E. (2004). On the Position of Subjects in Puerto Rican Spanish. In Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. and Ticio, M. E. (eds.), Cranberry Linguistics 2. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 12. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 78–92.Google Scholar
Toribio, A. J. (2000). Setting Parametric Limits on Dialectal Variation in Spanish. Lingua, 10, 315–341.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, H. (1995). Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus and Prominence (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. and Vilkuna, M. (1998). On Rheme and Kontrast. Syntax and Semantics, 29, 79–108.Google Scholar
References
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1999). Parametrizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP-Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539.Google Scholar
Amaral, P. and Schwenter, S. (2005). Contrast and the (Non-) Occurrence of Subject Pronouns. In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 116–127.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation. A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P. (2000). Clitics: A Window into the Null Subject Property. In Costa, J. (ed.), Portuguese Syntax: New Comparative Studies. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–93.Google Scholar
Beckman, M., Hirschberg, J., and Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The Original ToBI System and the Evolution of the ToBI Framework. In Jun, S.-A. (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych Verbs and θ-Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6 (3), 291–352.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. (1993). The Syntactic Role of Word Markers in Null Nominal Constructions. Probus, 5, 5–38.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. (2001). Focusing the “Right” Way in Romance Determiner Phrases. Probus, 13, 1–30.Google Scholar
Bianchi, V. and Frascarelli, M. (2010). Is Topic a Root Phenomenon? Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2, 43–88.Google Scholar
Borer, H. (1994). The Projection of Arguments. Benedicto, In E. and Runner, J. (eds.), Functional Projections, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17. Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian Syntax: A Government–Binding Approach. Boston, MA: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. (1995). The Scope and Limits of Switch-Reference as a Constraint on Pronominal Subject Expression. Hispanic Linguistics, 6/7, 1–27.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., and Shin, N. L. (2015). Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish: A Cross-Dialectal Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Casielles-Suárez, E. (2003). Left-Dislocated Structures in Spanish. Hispania, 86 (2). 326–338.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on Nominalization. In Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P. (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Waltham, pp. 184–221.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep Structure, Surface Structure and Semantic Interpretation. In Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L. (eds.), Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–216.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by Phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2008). On Phases. In Freidin, R., Otero, C. P., and Zubizarreta, M. L. (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 133–166.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1976). A Theory of Word Order with a Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Costa, J. (2004). Subject Positions and Interfaces: The Case of European Portuguese. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Demonte, V. (2008). Meaning-Form Correlations and Adjective Positions in Spanish. In Kennedy, C. and McNally, L. (eds.), Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–100.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. (2004). Unspecified Categories as the Key to Root Projections. In Adger, D., de Cat, C., and Tsoulas, G. (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 75–120.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2010). A Syntactic Account of Affix Rivalry in Spanish Nominalisations. In Alexiadou, A. and Rathert, M. (eds.), Nominalisations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 59–85.Google Scholar
Face, T. and d’Imperio, M. (2005). Reconsidering a Focal Typology: Evidence from Spanish and Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 17, 271–289.Google Scholar
Feldhausen, I. (2016a). The Relation between Prosody and Syntax: The Case of Different Types of Left-Dislocations in Spanish. In Armstrong, M., Henriksen, N., and Vanrell, M. D. M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 153–180.Google Scholar
Feldhausen, I. (2016b). Inter-Speaker Variation, Optimality Theory, and the Prosody of Clitic Left-Dislocations in Spanish. Probus, 28 (2), 293–333.Google Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, O. (1999). Two Types of Impersonal Sentences in Spanish: Locative and Dative Subjects. Syntax, 2 (2), 101–140.Google Scholar
Folli, R. and Harley, H. (2005). Flavors of v. In Kempchinsky, P. and Slabakova, R. (eds.), Aspectual Inquiries. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
Folli, R. and Harley, H. (2008). Teleology and Animacy in External Arguments. Lingua, 118, 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, M. and Hinterhölzl, R. (2007). Types of Topics in German and Italian. In Winkler, S. and Schwabe, K. (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 87–116Google Scholar
Gabriel, C. (2010). On Focus, Prosody, and Word Order in Argentinean Spanish: A Minimalist OT Account. ReVEL, 4, 183–222.Google Scholar
Goodall, G. (2001). The EPP in Spanish. In Davies, W. D. and Dubinsky, S. (eds.), Objects and Other Subjects: Grammatical Functions, Functional Categories, and Configurationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 193–223.Google Scholar
Gupton, T. (2014). The Syntax-Information Structure Interface: Clausal Word Order and the Left Periphery in Galician. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gupton, T. and Leal Méndez, T. (2013). Experimental Methodologies: Two Case Studies Investigating the Syntax-Discourse Interface. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 6 (1), 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, H. (2011). A Minimalist Approach to Argument Structure. In Boeckx, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 426–447.Google Scholar
Hoot, B. (2012). Presentational Focus in Heritage and Monolingual Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Horvath, J. (1986). FOCUS in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15 (4), 531–574.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K. (1989). The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory. In Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K. (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. (2015). Towards a Typology of Focus: Subject Position and Microvariation at the Discourse–Syntax Interface. Ampersand, 2, 49–60.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2000). Aspect Projections and Predicate Type. In Campos, H., Herburger, E., Morales-Front, A., and Walsh, T. J. (eds.), Hispanic Linguistics at the Turn of the Millennium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 171–187.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2004). Romance SE as an Aspectual Element. In Auger, J., Clements, J. C., and Vance, B. (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 239–256.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2006). Teasing Apart the Middle. In Laka, I. and Fernández, B. (eds.), Andolin gogoan/Homenaje a Andolin Eguzkitza. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 532–547.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the External Argument from its Verb. In Rooryck, J. and Zaring, L. (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Kluwer: Dordrecht, pp. 109–137.Google Scholar
Larson, R. (1988). On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19 (3), 335–391.Google Scholar
López, L. (2009). A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. and Treviño, E. (1999). Left Dislocated Subjects and the Pro-Drop Parameter: A Case Study of Spanish. Lingua, 107, 39–68.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2016). Focus-Related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Palomäki, J. (2016). The Pragmatics and Syntax of the Finnish -han Particle Clitic (Dissertation). University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Picallo, C. (2012). Structure of the Noun Phrase. In Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., and Erin, O’Rourke (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley, pp. 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, G. (2013). Argument Structure and Argument Structure Alternations. In den Dikken, M. (ed.), Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–321.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G. and Reiss, C. (eds.) (2007). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M. and Levin, B. (1988). What to do with θ-Roles. In Wilkins, W. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 21: Thematic Relations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 7–36.Google Scholar
Ritter, E. and Rosen, S. T. (1998). Delimiting Events in Syntax. In Butt, M. and Geuder, W. (eds.), The Projections of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 135–164.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). On the Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. (eds.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337.Google Scholar
Schwegler, A., Kempff, J., and Ameal-Guerra, A. (2010). Fonética y fonología españolas (4th edn). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Suñer, M. (2003). The Lexical Preverbal Subject in a Romance Null Subject Language. Where Art Thou? In Núñez-Cedeño, R., López, L., and Cameron, R. (eds.), A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use. Selected Papers from the 31st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 341–358.Google Scholar
Szendrői, K. (2004). Focus and the Interaction between Syntax and Pragmatics. Lingua, 114, 229–254.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. (1992). Agreement as Pronoun Incorporation. Paper presented at the 1992 Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW) Colloquium.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the Syntax of Clitic Placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26 (1), 79–123.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1999). Multiple Spell-Out. In Epstein, S. and Hornstein, N. (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 251–282.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. and Engdahl, E. (1996). The Linguistic Realization of Information Packaging. Linguistics, 34, 459–519.Google Scholar
Vanrell, M. and Fernández-Soriano, O. (2013). Variation at the Interfaces in Ibero-Romance. Catalan and Spanish Prosody and Word Order. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 12, 253–282.Google Scholar
Weil, H. (1879) [1844]. De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Joubert. (Translation: Super, C. W., The Order of Words in the Ancient Languages Compared with that of the Modern Languages. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, (1978) [1887].)Google Scholar
Williams, A. (2015). Arguments in Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zagona, K. (1999). Voice and Aspect. In Franco, J., Landa, A., and Martín, J. (eds.), Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 279–293.Google Scholar
References
Acquaviva, Paolo (2014). The Roots of Nominality, the Nominality of Roots. In Alexiadou, A. et al. (eds.), The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Grant (2016). Spanish Unspecified Objects as Null Incorporated Nouns. Probus, 28, 165–230.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas (2011). Lexical Meaning in Context. A Web of Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beavers, John (2010). The Structure of Lexical Meaning: Why Semantics Really Matters. Language, 86, 821–864.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit (2005). Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In Name Only; Vol. 2: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio (1999). El nombre común. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 1. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 3–75.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio (2004). REDES: Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo. Madrid: Ediciones SM.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio (2012). On the Lexical Integrity Hypothesis and its (In)accurate Predictions. Iberia, 4 (1), 140–173.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio and Masullo, Pascual José (1998). On Verbal Quantification in Spanish. In Fullana, O. and Roca, F. (eds.), Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages. Girona: Universitat de Girona, pp. 9–63.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro (1998). Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of “Semantic Parameter.” In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 53–104.Google Scholar
de Belder, Marijke (2008). Size Matters: Towards a Syntactic Decomposition of Countability. In Abner, Natasha and Bishop, Jason (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 116–122.Google Scholar
de Miguel, Elena (1999). El aspecto léxico. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 2. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 2977–3060.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta (1999). El adjetivo: Clases y usos. La posición del adjetivo en el sintagma nominal. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 1. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 129–215.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta (2006). Qué es sintáctico y qué es léxico en la interfaz entre sintaxis y léxico-semántica: Hipótesis y conjeturas. Signo y Seña, 15, 17–41.Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse (1995). On the Necessity of Distinguishing between (Un)boundedness and (A)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 1–19.Google Scholar
Espinal, María Teresa, Macià, Josep, Mateu, Jaume, and Quer, Josep (2014). Semántica. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio, Marín, Rafael, and McNally, Louise (2012). From Psych Verbs to Nouns. In Demonte, V. and McNally, L. (eds.), Telicity, Change, and State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 162–184.Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila and Massam, Diane (eds.). (2012). Count and Mass across Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Scott (2012). Number and Individuation (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Moreno-Quibén, Norberto, and Pérez-Jiménez, Isabel (2015). Comparison Classes and the Relative/Absolute Distinction: A Degree-Based Compositional Account of the ser/estar Distinction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33, 955–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia and Pérez-Jiménez, Isabel (2012). Aspectual Composition in <ser/estar+Adjective> Structures: Adjectival Scalarity and Verbal Aspect In Copular Constructions. Borealis 1, (1), 33–62.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J. (1993). On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 53–109.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi (2005). How do Verbs Get their Names? Denominal Verbs, Manner Incorporation and the Ontology of Verb Roots in English. In Erteschik-Shir, N. and Rapoport, T. (eds.), The Syntax of Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 42–64.Google Scholar
Husband, Matthew (2012). On the Compositional Nature of States. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher (2007). Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 1–45.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher and McNally, Louise (2005). Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates. Language, 81, 345–381.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1997). Remarks on Denominal Verbs. In Alsina, A., Bresnan, J., and Sells, P. (eds.), Argument Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 473–499.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred (1989). Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics. In Benthem, B. R., and Boas, P. V. E. (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 75–115.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred (1995). Common Nouns: A Contrastive Analysis of Chinese and English. In Carlson, G. and Pelletier, J. (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 398–411.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth (1999). Objecthood: An Event Structure Perspective. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 35, Vol. 1: The Main Session. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 223–247.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2005). Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Lisa (2010). Arguments for Pseudo-Resultative Predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 135–182.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan (2008). The Syntax of Inner Aspect. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec (1997). No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4 (2), 201–225.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec (2013). Verbal Argument Structure: Events and Participants. Lingua, 130, 152–168.Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael and McNally, Louise (2011). Inchoativity, Change of State, and Telicity: Evidence from Spanish Psychological Reflexive Verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 467–502.Google Scholar
Martí, Luisa (2011). Implicit Indefinite Objects: Grammar, not Pragmatics (MS). Queen Mary, University of London. Available from ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001317 (last access December 4, 2017).Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume (2002). Argument Structure: \Syntax–Semantics Interface (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya (1999). Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 2. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 1575–1629.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher (2008). Structuring Sense, Volume I: In Name Only and Structuring Sense, Volume II: The Normal Course of Events (Review). Language, 84, 343–369.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian (2008). Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Serrano-Dolader, David (1999). La derivación verbal y la parasíntesis. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 3. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 4683–4755.Google Scholar
Spalek, Alexandra (2014). Verb Meaning and Combinatory Semantics: A Corpus-Based Study of Spanish Change of State Verbs (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Stechow, Arnim von (1996). The Different Readings of Wieder “Again”: A Structural Account. Journal of Semantics, 13, 87–138.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard (1985). Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–149.Google Scholar
Toledo, Assaf and Sassoon, Galit (2011). Absolute vs. Relative Adjectives – Variance Within vs. Between Individuals. Proceedings of SALT, 21, 135–154.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk (1993). A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter (1997). Cause and Structure of Verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 27–68.Google Scholar
References
ACTFL (2015). Foreign Language Enrollments in K-12 Public Schools: Are Students Prepared for a Global Society? Washington, DC: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Available from https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/ReportSummary2011.pdf (last access December 5, 2017).Google Scholar
Austin, John L. (1975 [1962]). How to do Things with Words (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (1971). Out of the Pragmatic Wastebasket. Linguistic Inquiry, 2 (3), 401–407.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen and Mahan-Taylor, Rebecca (eds.) (2003). Teaching Pragmatics. Washington, DC: US Department of State.Google Scholar
Bataller, Rebecca (2010). Making a Request for a Service in Spanish: Pragmatic Development in the Study Abroad Setting. Foreign Language Annals, 43 (1), 160–175.Google Scholar
Belpoliti, Flavia and Pérez, María E. (2016). Giving Advice in Medical Spanish: Pragmatic and Intercultural Competence in the Spanish for the Health Professions Curriculum. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 3 (2), 127–142.Google Scholar
Bernal, María and Hernández-Flores, Nieves (eds.) (2009). Estudios sobre lengua, sociedad y cultura. Homenaje a Diana Bravo. Stockholm: EDICE.Google Scholar
Bravo, Diana (1999). ¿Imagen positiva vs. Imagen negativa?: Pragmática sociocultural y componentes de face. Oralia: Análisis del Discurso Oral, 2, 155–184.Google Scholar
Bravo, Diana (ed.) (2003). La perspectiva no etnocentrista de la cortesía: Identidad sociocultural de las comunidades hispanohablantes. Stockholm: EDICE.Google Scholar
Bravo, Diana (2004). Tensión entre universalidad y relatividad en las teorías de la cortesía. In Bravo, Diana and Briz, Antonio (eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
Bravo, Diana (2008a). (Im)politeness in Spanish-Speaking Socio-Cultural Contexts: Introduction. Pragmatics, 18 (4), 563–576.Google Scholar
Bravo, Diana (2008b). The Implications of Studying Politeness in Spanish-Speaking Contexts: A Discussion. Pragmatics, 18 (4), 584–603.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio (1998). El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio (2004). Cortesía verbal codificada y cortesía verbal interpretada. In Bravo, Diana and Briz, Antonio (eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 67–94.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio (2007). Para un análisis semántico, pragmático y sociopragmático de la cortesía atenuadora en España y América. LEA: Lingüística Española Actual, 29 (1), 5–40.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio (2012). La (no)atenuación y la (des)cortesía, lo lingüístico y lo social: ¿Son pareja? In Morales, Julio Escamilla and Vega, Grandfield Henry (eds.), Miradas multidisciplinares a los fenómenos de cortesía y descortesía en el mundo hispánico. Stockholm: EDICE, pp. 34–75.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C. (1987 [1978]). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canale, Michael (1983). From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. In Richards, Jack C. and Schmidt, Richard W. (eds.), Language and Communication. New York: Longman, pp. 2–27.Google Scholar
Canale, Michael and Swain, Merrill (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1 (1), 1–47.Google Scholar
Covarrubias, Patricia (2002). Culture, Communication and Cooperation: Interpersonal Relations and Pronominal Address in a Mexican Organization. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Crystal, David (ed.) (1997). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Escamilla Morales, Julio and Vega, Grandfield Henry (eds.) (2012). Miradas multidisciplinares a los fenómenos de cortesía y descortesía en el mundo hispánico. Stockholm: EDICE.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria (2004). Norms and Principles: Putting Social and Cognitive Pragmatics Together. In Márquez-Reiter, Rosina and Placencia, María Elena (eds.), Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 347–371.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria (2006 [1996]). Introducción a la pragmática. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Fant, Lars (1989). Cultural Mismatch in Conversation: Spanish and Scandinavian Communicative Behaviour in Negotiation Settings. HERMES – Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 2 (3), 247–265.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César (2006). Linguistic Politeness in Mexico: Refusal Strategies among Male Speakers of Mexican Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 38 (12), 2158–2187.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César (2008a). Politeness in Mexico and the United States: A Contrastive Study of the Realization and Perception of Refusals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César (2008b). Sociopragmatic Variation: Dispreferred Responses in Mexican and Dominican Spanish. Journal of Politeness Research, 4 (1), 81–110.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César (2010). Intra-Lingual Pragmatic Variation in Mexico City and San José, Costa Rica: A Focus on Regional Differences in Female Requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (11), 2992–3011.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César (2011). Cortesía, prosodia y variación pragmática en las peticiones de estudiantes universitarios mexicanos y dominicanos. In García, Carmen and Placencia, María Elena (eds.), Estudios de variación pragmática en español. Buenos Aires: Editorial Dunken, pp. 57–86.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César (ed.) (2015a). Current Issues in Pragmatic Variation. [Special Issue]. Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers, 15 (1). Available from https://www.indiana.edu/~iulcwp/wp/issue/view/25 (last access December 5, 2017).Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César (2015b). The Language of Service Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
García, Carmen (2008). Different Realizations of Solidarity Politeness: Comparing Venezuelan and Argentinean Invitations. Pragmatics and Beyond (New series), 178, 269–305.Google Scholar
García, Carmen (2009). The Performance of a Rapport-Challenging Act (Blaming) by Peruvian Spanish Speakers. Journal of Politeness Research, 5 (2), 217–241.Google Scholar
García, Carmen (2010). “Cuente conmigo”: The Expression of Sympathy by Peruvian Spanish Speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (2), 408–425.Google Scholar
García, Carmen (2011). Variación pragmática situacional de un grupo cultural en la realización de un acto de habla asertivo y un acto de habla expresivo. In García, Carmen and Placencia, María Elena (eds.), Estudios de variación pragmática en español. Buenos Aires: Editorial Dunken, pp. 277–306.Google Scholar
García, Carmen (2012). Complimenting Professional Achievement: A Case Study of Peruvian Spanish Speakers. Journal of Politeness Research, 8 (2), 223–244.Google Scholar
García, Carmen and Placencia, María Elena (eds.) (2011). Estudios de variación pragmática en español. Buenos Aires: Editorial Dunken.Google Scholar
Glide, Margaret (2015). ¿Cuáles son sus recomendaciones?: A Comparative Analysis of Discourse Practices Implemented in the Giving and Seeking of Advice on a Mexican Subreddit in both Spanish and English. Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers, 15 (1), 181–207. Available from https://www.indiana.edu/~iulcwp/wp/article/viewFile/15-07/207 (last access September 15, 2016).Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1982 [1967]). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Goldberg, David, Looney, Dennis, and Lusin, Natalia (2015). Enrollments in Languages Other Than English in United States Institutions of Higher Education, Fall 2013. New York: Modern Language Association of America. Available from https://www.mla.org/pdf/2013_enrollment_survey.pdf (last access May 4, 2017).Google Scholar
Gonzales, Adrienne (2013). Development of Politeness Strategies in Participatory Online Environments: A Case Study. In Taguchi, Naoko and Sykes, Julie M. (eds.), Technology in Interlanguage Pragmatics Research and Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 101–120.Google Scholar
González-Cruz, María-Isabel (2012). A Study of the Strategies Used by University Students in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Pragmatics, 22 (4), 543–565.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul (1975 [1967]). Logic and Conversation. In Geirsson, Heimir and Losonsky, Michael (eds.), Readings in Language and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 121–133.Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk (1979). Impositive Sentences in Spanish: Theory and Description in Linguistic Pragmatics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk (1994). La cortesía verbal: Estudio pragmalingüístico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk (2004). El análisis de la cortesía comunicativa: Categorización pragmalingüística de la cultura española. In Bravo, Diana and Briz, Antonio (eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 55–66.Google Scholar
Hernández-Flores, Nieves (1999). Politeness Ideology in Spanish Colloquial Conversation: The case of Advice. Pragmatics, 9 (1), 37–49.Google Scholar
Hernández Toribio, M. (2017). Cumplidos y halagos en el español peninsular: ¿Cuestión de términos? Onomázein, 37 (4), 188–210.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan (2013). Micro- and Macro-Pragmatics: Remapping their Terrains. International Review of Pragmatics, 5, 129–162.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1972). On Communicative Competence. In Pride, John Bernard and Holmes, Janet (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar
Landone, Elena (2012). Discourse Markers and Politeness in a Digital Forum in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 44 (9), 1799–1820.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria and Bou-Franch, Patricia (2013). A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Email Communication in Peninsular Spanish and British English: The Role of (In)formality and (In)directness. Pragmatics and Society, 4 (1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen (2013). “Just Click ‘Like’”: Computer-Mediated Responses to Spanish Compliments. Journal of Pragmatics, 51 (3), 47–67.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen (2015). Jocular Mockery in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Contrastive Study of a Spanish and English Facebook Community. Journal of Politeness Research, 11 (2), 289–327.Google Scholar
Márquez-Reiter, Rosina and Placencia, María Elena (2005). Spanish Pragmatics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Medina López, Javier (2013). Disculpas, cortesía ideológica y restauración de la imagen: A propósito de un real ejemplo a través de la prensa. Pragmática sociocultural/Sociocultural Pragmatics, 2 (1), 35–75.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Foundations of the Unity of Science: Towards an International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 1.2. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murillo Medrano, Jorge (ed.) (2005). Actos de habla y cortesía en distintas variedades del español: Perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas. Stockholm: EDICE.Google Scholar
Orletti, Franca and Mariottini, Laura (eds.) (2010). (Des)cortesía en español. Espacios teóricos y metodológicos para su estudio. Stockholm: EDICE.Google Scholar
Pablos-Ortega, C. de (2011). The Pragmatics of Thanking Reflected in the Textbooks for Teaching Spanish as a Foreign Language. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (9), 2411–2433.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sabater, C. (2015). The Rhetoric of Online Support Groups: A Sociopragmatic Analysis English–Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28 (2), 465–485.Google Scholar
Placencia, María Elena (2013). Cumplidos de mujeres universitarias en Quito y Sevilla: Un studio de variación pragmática regional. Pragmática sociocultural/Sociocultural Pragmatics, 1 (1), 100–134.Google Scholar
Placencia, María Elena and García, Carmen (eds.) (2006). Research on Politeness in the Spanish-Speaking World. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press, Routledge.Google Scholar
Rose, Kenneth and Kasper, Gabriele (eds.) (2001). Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruzickova, Elena (2007). Strong and Mild Requestive Hints and Positive-Face Redress in Cuban Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1170–1202.Google Scholar
Sbisá, Marina (2002). Speech Acts in Context. Language and Communication, 22 (4), 421–436.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron and Scollon, Suzanne Wong (1995). Intercultural Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, Scollon, Suzanne Wong, and Jones, Rodney. H. (2012). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach (3rd edn). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1968). Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts. Philosophical Review, 77 (4), 405–424.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1975). Indirect Speech Acts. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1976). A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society, 5 (1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Shively, Rachel (2011). L2 Pragmatic Development in Study Abroad: A Longitudinal Study of Spanish Service Encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (6), 1818–1835.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen (2008). Face, (Im)politeness and Rapport. In Spencer-Oatey, Helen (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum, pp. 11–47.Google Scholar
Sperber, Deirdre and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sykes, Julie M. (2013). Multiuser Virtual Environments: Learner Apologies in Spanish. In Taguchi, Naoko and Sykes, Julie M. (eds.), Technology in Interlanguage Pragmatics Research and Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 71–100.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny (1983). Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 91–112.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny (1998). Conversational Maxims. In Mey, Jacob (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 171–175.Google Scholar
Toledo Vega, Gloria and Toledo Azócar, Sonia (2014). Estrategias de cortesía para la petición en hablantes nativos del español de Chile y en hablantes de español como lengua extranjera. Onomázein, 29, 47–64.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef (1999). Continental European Perspective View. In Huang, Yan (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 120–131.Google Scholar
Zahler, Sara (2015). Pragmalinguistic Variation in Electronic Personal Ads from Mexico City and London. Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers, 15 (1), 208–230. Available from https://www.indiana.edu/~iulcwp/wp/article/viewFile/15-08/198 (last access December 5, 2017).Google Scholar