Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:20:52.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Applicant Reactions in Employee Recruitment and Selection

The Role of Technology

from Part II - Technology in Staffing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

By
Ioannis Nikolaou ,
Konstantina Georgiou ,
Talya N. Bauer  and
Donald M. Truxillo
Edited by
Richard N. Landers
Richard N. Landers
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior , pp. 100 - 130
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H., Henle, C. A., & BeatyJr, J. C. (2001). Virtual reality technology: A new tool for personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. G., Scotter, J. R., & Otondo, R. F. (2004). Recruitment communication media: Impact on prehire outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. (2011). Perceived Job Discrimination: Toward a model of applicant propensity to case initiation in selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(3), 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N., Ahmed, S., & Costa, A. C. (2012). Applicant Reactions in Saudi Arabia: Organizational attractiveness and core-self evaluation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(2), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N., Salgado, J. F., & Hülsheger, U. R. (2010). Applicant Reactions in Selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(3), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, M. B., Landers, R. N., & Collmus, A. B. (2016). Gamifying recruitment, selection, training, and performance management: Game-thinking in human resource management. In Gangadharbatla, H. & Davis, D. Z. (Eds.), Emerging research and trends in gamification (pp. 140–165). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvey, R. D., Strickland, W., Drauden, G., & Martin, C. (1990). Motivational components of test taking. Personnel Psychology, 43(4), 695–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badger, J., Kaminsky, S., & Behrend, T. (2014). Media richness and information acquisition in internet recruitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(7), 866–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, H., & Austin, J. (2000). Measuring ability via the internet: Opportunities and issues. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Bartram, D. (2000). Internet recruitment and selection: Kissing frogs to find princes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, T., Truxillo, D., Sanchez, R., Craig, J., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 387–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Tucker, J. S., Weathers, V., Bertolino, M., Erdogan, B., & Campion, M. A. (2006). Selection in the Information Age: The impact of privacy concerns and computer experience on applicant reactions. Journal of Management, 32(5), 601–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, S. L., Johnson, A. F., Takach, S. E., & Stone, D. L. (August 2012). Factors affecting applicants’ reactions to the collection of data in social network websites. Presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cable, D. M. & Yu, K. Y. T. (2006). Managing job seekers’ organizational image beliefs: The role of media richness and media credibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caers, R. & Castelyns, V. (2011). LinkedIn and Facebook in Belgium: The influences and biases of social network sites in recruitment and selection procedures. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelli, P. (2001). Making the most of online recruitment. Harvard Business Review, 79, 139–146.Google Scholar
Cardy, R. & Miller, J. (2005). eHR and performance management: A consideration of positive potential and the dark side. In Gueutal, H., Stone, D. L. & Salas, E., The brave new world of eHR: Human resources management in the digital age (pp. 138–165), Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., & Webster, J. (2003). Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: A field investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chow, S. & Chapman, D. (2013). Gamifying the employee recruitment process. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cober, R. & Brown, D. (2006). Direct employers association recruiting trends survey. Booz Allen Hamilton, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cober, R. T., Brown, D. J., & Levy, P. E. (2004). Form, content, and function: An evaluative methodology for corporate employment web sites. Human Resource Management, 43(2–3), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, H. K., Maraist, C., & Bing, M. N. (2011). Friend or foe? The promise and pitfalls of using social networking sites for HR decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derks, D. & Bakker, A. (2013). The psychology of digital media at work. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulebohn, J. H. & Marler, J. H. (2005). e-Compensation: The potential to transform practice. In Gueutal, H., Stone, D. L., & Salas, E., The brave new world of eHR: Human resources management in the digital age (pp. 166–189), Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ford, D. K., Truxillo, D. M., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Rejected but still there: Shifting the focus in applicant reactions to the promotional context. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(4), 402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García‐Izquierdo, A. L., Moscoso, S., & Ramos‐Villagrasa, P. J. (2012). Reactions to the fairness of promotion methods: Procedural justice and job satisfaction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(4), 394–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanaki, E. (2002). The decision to recruit online: A descriptive study. Career Development International, 7(4), 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiou, K., Nikolaou, I., & Gouras, A. (2017). Serious gaming in employee selection process. In I. Nikolaou (2017): Alliance for Organizational Psychology Invited Symposium-The Impact of Technology on Recruitment and Selection: An International Perspective. 32nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, USA.Google Scholar
Gherson, D. & Jackson, A. (2001). Web-based compensation planning. In Walker, A. J. (Ed.), Web-based human resources (pp. 83–95). New York, NY: McGr.aw-HillGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, S. W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, S. W., & Steiner, D. D. (2012). Applicant Reactions to Testing and Selection. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection (pp. 629–666). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassdoor (2017). Site Stats. Retrieved from www.glassdoor.com/press/facts/.Google Scholar
Guchait, P., Ruetzler, T., Taylor, J., & Toldi, N. (2014). Video interviewing: A potential selection tool for hospitality managers: A study to understand applicant perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueutal, H. G., Kluemper, D. H., & Rosen, P. A. (2009). Future employment selection methods: Evaluating social networking web sites. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 567–580.Google Scholar
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Paper presented at the System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. & Fink, L. (1987). A field study of applicant reactions to employment opportunities: Does the recruiter make a difference? Personnel Psychology, 40(4), 765–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. M., Hoye, G. V., & Lievens, F. (2003). Privacy and attitudes towards internet‐based selection systems: A cross‐cultural comparison. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(2–3), 230–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausknecht, J. P. (2013). Applicant Reactions. In Yu, K. Y. T. & Cable, D. M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Recruitment (pp. 35–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 639–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herriot, P. (1989). Selection as a social process. In Smith, M. & Robertson, I. T. (Eds.), Advances in selection and assessment (pp. 171–187). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Herriot, P. (2004). Social Identities and Applicant Reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(1–2), 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoang, T. G., Truxillo, D. M., Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2012). Cross-cultural examination of applicant reactions to selection methods: United States and Vietnam. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(2), 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honkaniemi, L., Feldt, T., Metsapelto, R. L., & Tolvanen, A. (2013). Personality types and applicant reactions in real-life selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21(1), 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. & Schuler, R. (2003). Managing human resources through strategic partnerships (8th edn.). Mason, OH: Thompson South-Western.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. (2009). Surviving the social explosion. Landscape Management, 48(12), 10–13.Google Scholar
Jones, J. W., Brasher, E. E., & Huff, J. W. (2002). Innovations in integrity‐based personnel selection: Building a technology‐friendly assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1–2), 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2009). The fairyland of Second Life: Virtual social worlds and how to use them. Business Horizons, 52(6), 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, K. & Peluchette, J. (2013). Possibilities and pitfalls of using online social networking in human resources management. Psychology for Business Success, 4, 119–138.Google Scholar
Kashi, K. & Zheng, C. (2013). Extending technology acceptance model to the e-recruitment context in Iran. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21(1), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, J. F., Dickter, D. N., Russell, D. P., & Sacco, J. M. (2005). E-selection. In Gueutal, H. G. & Stone, D. L. (Eds.), The brave new world of eHR: Human resources management in the digital age (pp. 54–103). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. C., da Motta Veiga, S. P., Buckley, M. R., & Gavin, M. B. (2013). The role of trustworthiness in recruitment and selection: A review and guide for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konig, C. J., Klehe, U. C., Berchtold, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2010). Reasons for Being Selective When Choosing Personnel Selection Procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2012). Online gaming to find a new job: Examining job seekers’ intention to use serious games as a self-assessment tool. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(3), 218–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leece, R. (2005). A virtual careers fair. Australian Journal of Career Development, 14(2), 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lievens, F. & Harris, M. M. (2003). Research on internet recruiting and testing: Current status and future directions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18, 131–166.Google Scholar
Lin, H. F. (2010). Applicability of the extended theory of planned behavior in predicting job seeker intentions to use job‐search websites. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1), 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llorens, J. J. & Kellough, J. E. (2007). A revolution in public personnel administration: The growth of web-based recruitment and selection processes in the federal service. Public Personnel Management, 36(3), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lory, B. E. (2010). Using Facebook to assess candidates during the recruiting process: Ethical implications. NACE Journal, 71(1), 37–40.Google Scholar
Madera, J. M. (2012). Using social networking websites as a selection tool: The role of selection process fairness and job pursuit intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1276–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makransky, G. & Glas, C. A. (2011). Unproctored internet test verification: Using adaptive confirmation testing. Organizational Research Methods, 14(4), 608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, S. D. & Liu, Y. (2007). Developing effective e-recruiting websites: Insights for managers from marketers. Business Horizons, 50(4), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. M., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Anderson, N. R., Costa, A. C., & Ahmed, S. M. (2017). Applicant perspectives during selection: A review addressing “So What?,” “What’s New?,” and “Where to Next?.” Journal of Management, 43(6), 1693–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J., Hrabluik, C., & Jelley, R. B. (2009). Progression through the ranks: Assessing employee reactions to high-stakes employment testing. Personnel Psychology, 62 (4),793–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. M., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Lievens, F., Kung, M. C., Sinar, E. F., & Campion, M. A. (2013). Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 701–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarland, L. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1653–1677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McManus, M. A., & Ferguson, M. W. (2003). Biodata, personality, and demographic differences of recruits from three sources. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(2–3), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscoso, S. & Salgado, J. F. (2004). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Spain and Portugal. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(1–2), 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaou, I. (2014). Social networking web sites in job search and employee recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(2), 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaou, I. & Georgiou, K. (2017). Serious gaming and applicants’ reactions: The role of openness to experience. In M. Armstrong, D. R. Sanchez & K. N. Bauer (2017), Gaming and Gamification IGNITE: Current Trends in Research and Application. 32nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, USAGoogle Scholar
Nikolaou, I. & Judge, T. A. (2007). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Greece: The role of core self-evaluations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(2), 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oostrom, J. K., Born, M. P., & van der Molen, H. T. (2013). Webcam tests in personnel selection. In Derks, D. & Bakker, A. (Eds.), The psychology of digital media at work (pp. 166–180), London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parry, E., Stefan, S., & Holm, A. (2014). Institutional context and e-recruitment practices of Danish organizations. Employee Relations, 36(4), 432–455.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. G. & Tuten, T. L. (2001). Internet recruiting in the banking industry. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, E. L., Simpson, P. A., NicDomhnaill, O. M., & Siegel, D. M. (2003). Is there a technology age gap? Associations among age, skills, and employment outcomes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(2–3), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ployhart, R. E. & Harold, C. M. (2004). The applicant attribution-reaction theory (AART): An integrative theory of applicant attributional processing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(1–2), 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ployhart, R. E. & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 72(3), 308–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ployhart, R. E., Schmitt, N., & Tippins, N. T. (2017). Solving the supreme problem: 100 years of selection and recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., Holtz, B. C., & Kemp, C. (2003). Web‐based and paper‐and‐pencil testing of applicants in a proctored setting: Are personality, biodata, and situational judgment tests comparable? Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 733–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potosky, D. & Bobko, P. (2004). Selection testing via the internet: Practical considerations and exploratory empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 57(4), 1003–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richman-Hirsch, W. L., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Examining the impact of administration medium on examinee perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Thatcher, J. B. (2016). Social media in employee-selection-related decisions: A research agenda for uncharted territory. Journal of Management, 42(1), 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roulin, N. (2014). The Influence of employers’ use of social networking websites in selection, online self-promotion, and personality on the likelihood of faux pas postings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(1), 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roulin, N. & Bangerter, A. (2013). Social networking websites in personnel selection. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(3), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruël, H. & Bondarouk, T. (2004). e-HRM: Innovation or irritation. ECIS 2004 Proceedings, 110.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M. & Ployhart, R. E. (2000). Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26(3), 565–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. M. & Ployhart, R. E. (2014). A century of selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 693–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sears, J., Zhang, H., Wiesner, H. W., Hackett, D. R., & Yuan, Y. (2013). A comparative assessment of videoconference and face-to-face employment interviews. Management Decision, 51(8), 1733–1752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, R. J., Roberts, K., Freeman, M., & Clayton, A. C. (2012, August). Do they care? Applicant reactions to on-line social networking presence checks. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinkel, S., van Vianen, A., & van Dierendonck, D. (2013). Selection fairness and outcomes: A field study of interactive effects on applicant reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21(1), 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, T. J., Goffin, R. D., & Daljeet, K. N. (2015). “Give us your social networking site passwords”: Implications for personnel selection and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuler, H. (1993). Social validity of selection situations: A concept and some empirical results. In Schuler, H., Farr, J. L., & Smith, M. (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and Organizational Perspectives (pp. 11–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Selden, S. & Orenstein, J. (2011). Government e‐recruiting web sites: The influence of e‐recruitment content and usability on recruiting and hiring outcomes in US state governments. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(1), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for Human Resources Management-SHRM (2016). Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition – Recruitment and Screening. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/pages/social-media-recruiting-screening-2015.aspx.Google Scholar
Spinks, N., Wells, B., & Meche, M. (1999). Appraising the appraisals: Computerized performance appraisal systems. Career Development International, 4(2), 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, D. D. & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. L., Deadrick, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., & Johnson, R. (2015). The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 216–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. L. & Dulebohn, J. H. (2013). Emerging issues in theory and research on electronic human resource management (eHRM). Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., & Isenhour, L. C. (2005). E-recruiting: Online strategies for attracting talent. In Gueutal, H., Stone, D. L. & Salas, E., The brave new world of eHR: Human resources management in the digital age (pp. 22–53), Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Stone, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Johnson, T. L. (2013). Factors affecting the effectiveness and acceptance of electronic selection systems. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 50–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopfer, J. M. & Gosling, S. D. (2013). Online social networks in the work context. In Derks, D. & Bakker, A. (Eds.), The psychology of digital media at work (pp. 39–59), London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stoughton, J. W., Thompson, L., & Meade, A. (2015). Examining applicant reactions to the use of social networking websites in pre-employment screening. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, S. G., Miles, J. A., & Levesque, L. L. (2001). The effects of videoconference, telephone, and face-to-face media on interviewer and applicant judgments in employment interviews. Journal of Management, 27(3), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tippins, N. T. (2015). Technology and assessment in selection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 551–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tippins, N. T., Beaty, J., Drasgow, F., Gibson, W. M., Pearlman, K., Segall, D. O., & Shepherd, W. (2006). Unproctored internet testing in employment settings. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 189–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toldi, N. L. (2011). Job applicants favor video interviewing in the candidate‐selection process. Employment Relations Today, 38(3), 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, A. (2002). Energy firm sharpens recruiting, saves money with in-house job board. Canadian HR Reporter, 15(20), 7–8.Google Scholar
Truxillo, D. M. & Bauer, T. N. (2011). Applicant Reactions to Organizations and Selection Systems. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (pp. 379–398). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., Campion, M. A., & Paronto, M. E. (2006). A field study of the role of Big Five personality in applicant perceptions of selection fairness, self, and the hiring organization. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 14(3), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., & Garcia, A. M. (2017). Applicant Reactions to Hiring Procedures. In Goldstein, H. W., Pulakos, E. D., Passmore, J., & Semedo, C. (Eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Recruitment, Selection and Employee Retention (pp. 53–70). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., McCarthy, J. M., Anderson, N., & Ahmed, S. M. (2017). Applicant Perspectives on Employee Selection Systems. In Ones, D., Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C., & Sinangil, H. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) Psychology (2nd edn., pp. 508–532), London: Sage.Google Scholar
Truxillo, D. M., Bodner, T. E., Bertolino, M., Bauer, T. N., & Yonce, C. A. (2009). Effects of explanations on applicant reactions: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(4), 346–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hoye, G. (2014). Word-of-mouth as a recruitment source: An integrative model. In Yu, K. Y. T. & Cable, D. M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Recruitment (pp. 251–268). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Hoye, G. & Lievens, F. (2007). Investigating Web‐Based Recruitment Sources: Employee testimonials vs word‐of‐mouse. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(4), 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voermans, M. & van Veldhoven, M. (2007). Attitude towards e-HRM: An empirical study at Philips. Personnel Review, 36(6), 887–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, H. J., Bauer, T., Cole, M., Bernerth, J., Feild, H., & Short, J. (2013). Is this how I will be treated? Reducing uncertainty through recruitment interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1325–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, H. J., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., Armenakis, A. A., & Bernerth, J. B. (2009). Displaying employee testimonials on recruitment web sites: Effects of communication media, employee race, and job seeker race on organizational attraction and information credibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1354–1364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, J. & Foot, K. (2005). Corporate e‐cruiting: The construction of work in Fortune 500 recruiting web sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(1), 44–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelenskaya, K. & Singh, N. (2011). Exploring virtual recruiting from employers’ perspective using “Second Life.” Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 10(2), 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zide, J., Elman, B., & Shahani-Denning, C. (2014). LinkedIn and recruitment: How profiles differ across occupations. Employee Relations, 36(5), 583–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×