Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:26:33.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Implications for Talent Management and Impact on Employees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2020

Edited by
Brian J. Hoffman ,
Mindy K. Shoss  and
Lauren A. Wegman
Brian J. Hoffman
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Mindy K. Shoss
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Lauren A. Wegman
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Changing Nature of Work , pp. 295 - 618
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ancona, D. (2011). Sensemaking: Framing and acting in the unknown. In Snook, S., Nohria, N., & Khurana, R. (Eds.), The handbook for teaching leadership (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2008). Conceptualization of cultural intelligence: Definition, distinctiveness, and nomological network. In Ang, S. & Van Dyne, L. (Eds.), Handbook on cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement and applications (pp. 3–15). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917–1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836–874.Google Scholar
Backman, M. (2018, June 11). Job hopping: Why Millennials resign nearly twice as often as older workers. Retrieved September 5, 2018, from www.usatoday.com/story/money/careers/employment-trends/2018/06/11/why-millennials-resign-more-than-older-workers/35921637/Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2009). The crossover of work engagement between working couples: A closer look at the role of empathy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 220–236.Google Scholar
Barley, S. R., Bechky, B. A., & Milliken, F. J. (2017). The changing nature of work: Careers, identities, and work lives in the 21st century. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3, 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. A. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54, 387–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belout, A., & Gauvreau, C. (2004). Factors influencing project success: The impact of human resource management. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersin, J. N. (2018). 2018 Deloitte human capital trends report: The rise of the social enterprise. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/HCTrends2018/2018-HCtrends_Rise-of-the-social-enterprise.pdfGoogle Scholar
Boudreau, J. W. (2012). Strategic I–O psychology lies beyond HR. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 86–91.Google Scholar
Boudreau, J. W., & Ziskin, I. (2015). Black holes & white spaces: Reimagining the future of work and HR with the CHREATE Project. Alexandria, VA: HR People & Strategy.Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D., & Rhee, K. S. (2000). Clustering competence in emotional intelligence: insights from the Emotional Competence Inventory. In Bar-On, R. & Parker, J. D. A. (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory development, assessment, and application at home, school and in the workplace (pp. 343–361). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Buckingham, M., & Goodall, A. (2015). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93, 40–50.Google Scholar
Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64, 225–262.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P., & Tavis, A. (2016). The performance management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 94, 58–67.Google Scholar
Caveon Security Insights. (2013). The good and bad of online proctoring. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.caveon.com/2013/03/15/the-good-and-bad-of-online-proctoring/Google Scholar
Chang, C. H., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Tan, J. A. (2012). Core self-evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38, 81–128.Google Scholar
Christian, M. S., Edwards, B. D., & Bradley, J. C. (2010). Situational judgment tests: Constructs assessed and a meta‐analysis of their criterion‐related validities. Personnel Psychology, 63, 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. J., & Han, J. (2004). Exploring applicant pool quantity and quality: The effects of early recruitment practice strategies, corporate advertising, and firm reputation. Personnel Psychology, 57, 685–717.Google Scholar
Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., Payne, S. C., Davison, H. K., & Gilliland, S. W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psychology, 53, 325–351.Google Scholar
Daley, C. (2017). Open-sourced AI: The next big step for the gig economy. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from https://aibusiness.com/ai-future-project-management-gig-economy/Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship.” Retrieved August 6, 2018 from https://entrepreneurship.duke.edu/news-item/the-meaning-of-social-entrepreneurship/Google Scholar
Development Dimensions International (DDI). (2015). Competency management at its most competent. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/za/Documents/human-capital/ZA_Competency_management_at_its_most_competent.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dineen, B. R., & Allen, D. G. (2016). Third party employment branding: Human capital inflows and outflows following “Best Places to Work” certifications. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 90–112.Google Scholar
Dixon, L. (2017). The future of the project management role. Retrieved August 6, 2018 from www.clomedia.com/2017/11/22/future-project-management/Google Scholar
Driggs, W., & Rogers, E. (2018). Building trusted relationships through analytics and experience. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-building-trusted-relationships-through-analytics-and-experience/$FILE/EY-building-trusted-relationships-through-analytics-and-experience.pdfGoogle Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit & SHRM Foundation. (2014). Future trends in HR and work. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from http://futurehrtrends.eiu.com/report-2016/executive-summary/Google Scholar
Ell, K. (2017, August 9). It’s taking longer than ever to get hired, Glassdoor survey shows. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/08/09/its-taking-longer-than-ever-get-hired-glassdoor-survey-shows/551001001/Google Scholar
Ghasemaghaei, M., Ebrahimi, S., & Hassanein, K. (2018). Data analytics competency for improving firm decision making performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27, 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, I. L., Zedeck, S., & Schneider, B. (1993). An exploration of the job-analysis-content validity process. In Schmitt, N. and Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 3–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Mount, M. K., & Oh, I. S. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1222–1243.Google Scholar
Green, P. C. (1999). Building robust competencies: Linking human resource systems to organizational strategies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
Guenole, N. (2014). Maladaptive personality at work: Exploring the darkness. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 85–97.Google Scholar
Hagel, J. III (2018, August 21). 3 kinds of jobs that will thrive as automation advances. Retrieved September 10, 2018, from https://hbr.org/2018/08/3-kinds-of-jobs-that-will-thrive-as-automation-advancesGoogle Scholar
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869.Google Scholar
Institute for Credentialing Excellence (ICE). (2015). Remote proctoring test delivery and trends: A report on options and considerations. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.credentialingexcellence.org/Google Scholar
Joseph, D. L., Jin, J., Newman, D. A., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2015). Why does self-reported emotional intelligence predict job performance? A meta-analytic investigation of mixed EI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 298–342.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self‐evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331.Google Scholar
Kane, J., Lajmi, M., & Hontalas, J. (2018). Next generation workforce: The new HR. Accenture. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.accenture.com/us-en/insight-next-generation-workforceGoogle Scholar
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2002). Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2006). Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 146–162.Google Scholar
King, D. W. (2018, March). What’s keeping HR up? Human Resource Executive. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.humanresourceexecutive-digital.com/humanresourceexecutive/march_2018?article_id=1361909&pg=25#pg25Google Scholar
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–161.Google Scholar
Lawler, E. E. III (1994). From job‐based to competency‐based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 3–15.Google Scholar
Lievens, F., & Patterson, F. (2011). The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 927–940.Google Scholar
Lyons, B. D., Hoffman, B. J., Bommer, W. H., Kennedy, C. L., & Hetrick, A. L. (2016). Off-duty deviance: Organizational policies and evidence for two prevention strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 463–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mankins, M. (2017, September 7). How leading companies build the workforces they need to stay ahead. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from https://hbr.org/2017/09/how-leading-companies-build-the-workforces-they-need-to-stay-aheadGoogle Scholar
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J., & Mahajan, D. (2016, October). Independent work: Choice, necessity, and the gig economy. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/independent-work-choice-necessity-and-the-gig-economyGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007, Spring). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/social_entrepreneurship_the_case_for_definition#Google Scholar
Martone, D. (2003). A guide to developing a competency‐based performance‐management system. Employment Relations Today, 30, 23–32.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. M., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Anderson, N. R., Costa, A. C., & Ahmed, S. M. (2017). Applicant perspectives during selection: A review addressing “so what?,” “what’s new?,” and “where to next?” Journal of Management, 43, 1693–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meriac, J. P., Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., & Fleisher, M. S. (2008). Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: A meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1042–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640–647.Google Scholar
Nga, J. K. H., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 259–282.Google Scholar
Organ, D. W. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., & Holtz, B. C. (2008). The diversity–validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racioethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Personnel Psychology, 61, 153–172.Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., Schneider, B., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Staffing organizations: Contemporary practice and theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Priceonomics (2017). The data science diversity gap. Forbes. Retrieved September 4, 2018, from www.forbes.com/sites/priceonomics/2017/09/28/the-data-science-diversity-gap/#26b08345f58bGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, D. H., McCauley, C. D., & Tsacoumis, S. (2018). A critical evaluation of the state of assessment and development for senior leaders. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, D., Patel, R., Bright, A., Gregory, D., & Gowing, M. K. (2002). Developing competency models to promote integrated human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 41, 309–324.Google Scholar
Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & McFarland, L. A. (2005). A meta‐analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psychology, 58(4), 1009–1037.Google Scholar
Roth, P. L., Huffcutt, A. I., & Bobko, P. (2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 694–706.Google Scholar
Royal, C., & Blasingame, D. (2015). Data journalism: An explication. ISOJ Journal, 6(1). Retrieved August 6, 2018, from https://isojjournal.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/data-journalism-an-explication/Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., Ployhart, R. E., & Friedel, L. A. (1998). Using personality testing to reduce adverse impact: A cautionary note. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 298–307.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., & Tippins, N. T. (2004). Attracting and selecting: What psychological research tells us. Human Resource Management, 43, 305–318.Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Lievens, F., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 254–273.Google Scholar
Salm, L. (2017). 70% of employers are snooping candidates’ social media profiles. Retrieved September 6, 2018, from www.careerbuilder.com/advice/social-media-survey-2017.Google Scholar
Sanchez, C. (2018, April 26). Study: Colleges that ditch the SAT and ACT can enhance diversity. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.npr.org/sections/ed/2018/04/26/604875394/study-colleges-that-ditch-the-sat-and-act-can-enhance-diversityGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, J. I., & Levine, E. L. (2009). What is (or should be) the difference between competency modeling and traditional job analysis? Human Resource Management Review, 19, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Battista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B. et al. (2000). The practice of competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53, 703–740.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.Google Scholar
Silzer, R. & Jeanneret, R. (2011). Individual psychological assessment: A practice and science in search of common ground. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 270–296.Google Scholar
Singh, P. (2008). Job analysis for a changing workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 87–99.Google Scholar
Smither, J. W., Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., Pearlman, K., & Stoffey, R. W. (1993). Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49–76.Google Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2015). SHRM research: Workforce readiness and skills shortages. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/labor-market-and-economic-data/Documents/Workforce%20Readiness%20and%20Skills%20Shortages.pdfGoogle Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2016). The new talent landscape: Recruiting difficulty and skills shortages. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Documents/SHRM%20New%20Talent%20Landscape%20Recruiting%20Difficulty%20Skills.pdfGoogle Scholar
Soulier, E., & Caussanel, J. (2002). Narrative tools to improve collaborative sense-making. AAAI Technical Report WS-02-09. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2002/WS-02-09/WS02-09-002.pdfGoogle Scholar
Trautman, S., & McKee, M. (2014). The power of knowledge transfer: preserving your secret sauce while mitigating talent management risks. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.executivecoachglobal.com/the-power-of-knowledge-transfer-preserving-your-secret-sauce-while-mitigating-talent-management-risks/Google Scholar
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice (1978). Adoption by four agencies of uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 38290–38315.Google Scholar
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Lanivich, S. E., Roth, P. L., & Junco, E. (2016). Social media for selection? Validity and adverse impact potential of a Facebook-based assessment. Journal of Management, 42, 1811–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Putka, D. J., & Lanivich, S. E. (2011). Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1167–1194.Google Scholar
Vollmer, C., Egol, M., & Sayani, N. (2014, Autumn). Reimagine your enterprise: Make human-centered design the heart of your digital agenda. Strategy+Business. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.strategy-business.com/article/00258?gko=6626bGoogle Scholar
Wang, K. (2016). Why collaborate? Three frameworks to understand business–NGO partnerships. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from http://blogs.worldbank.org/category/tags/knowledge-transferGoogle Scholar
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management, 44, 352–386.Google Scholar
Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372–376.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from http://reports.weforum.org/future-of-jobs-2016/skills-stability/#view/fn-13Google Scholar
Zhang, V. (2017). Breaking down the gender gap in data science. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from www.forbes.com/sites/womensmedia/2017/08/03/breaking-down-the-gender-gap-in-data-science/#67b60ca4428Google Scholar

References

About LinkedIn. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from https://press.linkedin.com/about-linkedinGoogle Scholar
Aeppel, T. (2015, February 24). What clever robots mean for jobs: Experts rethink belief that tech always lifts employment as machines take on skills once thought uniquely human. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 25, 2015, from www.wsj.com/articles/what-clever-robots-mean-for-jobs-1424835002Google Scholar
Alge, B. J., & Hansen, S. D. (2014). Workplace monitoring and surveillance research since 1984: A review and agenda. In Coovert, M. D. and Thompson, L. F. (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology (pp. 209–237). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., and Hanson, G. H. (2016). The China shock: Learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 205–40.Google Scholar
Babcock, P. (2017, February 24). 5 steps to improve diversity recruiting. SHRM online. Retrieved February 26, 2017, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/talent-acquisition/pages/five-steps-improve-diversity-recruiting.aspxGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, E. (2017). Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 627–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, D. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2017). How technology is changing work and organizations. In Markoff, J. (Chair), The future of work. Symposium presented at the World Conference of Science Journalists, San Francisco, CA, October 2017.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2019). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Applied psychology in talent management (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2017). Technology-driven changes in work and employment. Communications of the ACM, 60(12), 60–67.Google Scholar
Catalyst. (2016, August 11). Women in the workforce: United States. Retrieved from www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-workforce-united-states#footnoteref21_5e42rs9Google Scholar
Chaykowski, K. (2018, February 28). Facebook takes on LinkedIn and Glassdoor, expanding its job-posting tool to 40 countries. Forbes. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from www.forbes.com/sites/kathleenchaykowski/2018/02/28/facebook-expands-jobs-postings-to-40-countries-taking-on-linkedin-glassdoor/#4727c58a207fGoogle Scholar
Colbert, A., Yee, N., & George, G. (2016). The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 731–739.Google Scholar
Coovert, M. D., and Thompson, L. F. (Eds.). (2014). The psychology of workplace technology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Costanza, D., Badger, J., Fraser, R., Severt, J., & Gade, P. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375–394.Google Scholar
Deal, J. J. (2007). Retiring the generation gap. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dineen, B. R., & Allen, D. G. (2014). Internet recruiting 2.0: Shifting paradigms. In Yu, K. Y. T. & Cable, D. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of recruitment, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 382–401.Google Scholar
Doyle, A. (2017, January 31). Top 10 best job websites. Retrieved April 13, 2017, from www.thebalance.com/top-best-job-websites-2064080Google Scholar
Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 569–574.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2014, February). What’s next: Future global trends affecting your organization. Alexandria, VA: SHRM Foundation.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, L. M., Ryan, K., and King, E. B. (2013). What do the young (old) people think of me? Content and accuracy of age-based meta-stereotypes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(6), 633–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, T. L. (2016). Thank you for being late: An optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of accelerations. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Ghemawat, P. (2017). Globalization in the age of Trump. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 10–23.Google Scholar
Goler, L., Gale, J., Harrington, B., & Grant, A. (2018). Why people really quit their jobs. Harvard Business Review, January. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/01/why-people-really-quit-their-jobs?referral=03759&cm_vc=rr_item_page.bottomGoogle Scholar
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Asplund, J. W. (2010). Causal impact of employee work perceptions on the bottom line of organizations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 378–389.Google Scholar
Hom, P. W. (2011). Organizational exit. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 325–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
How to use social media for applicant screening. (2016, August 10). Retrieved October 12, 2016, from www. shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/how-to guides/pages/howtousesocialmediaforapplicantscreening.aspxGoogle Scholar
Jordan, M. (2015). Asians to surpass Hispanics as largest foreign-born group in US by 2055. Wall Street Journal, September 28. Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/asians-to-surpass-hispanics-as-largest-foreign-born-group-in-u-s-by-2055-1443412861Google Scholar
Kandefer, K. (2017, January 14). 50 recruitment stats HR pros must know in 2017. Retrieved October 21, 2017, from https://devskiller.com/50-recruitment-stats-hr-pros-must-know-2017/Google Scholar
King, A. G., and Mrkonich, M. (2016, October 7). The legal risks of “big data”: What HR should know. Retrieved October 8, 2016, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/legal-risks-of-big-data.aspxGoogle Scholar
Landis, R. S., Earnest, D. R., & Allen, D. G. (2014). Realistic job previews: Past, present, and future. In Yu, K. Y. T. and Cable, D. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of recruitment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 423–436.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., Hom, P., Eberly, M., & Li, J. (2018). Managing employee retention and turnover with 21st-century ideas. Organizational Dynamics, 47, 88–98.Google Scholar
LinkedIn talent solutions. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from https://business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions/recruiterGoogle Scholar
Loten, A. (2017). AI to drive job growth by 2020: Gartner. Wall Street Journal, December 15. Retrieved from https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2017/12/15/ai-to-drive-job-growth-by-2020-gartner/Google Scholar
Lund, S., Ramaswamy, S, & Manyika, J. (2012). Preparing for a new era of work. McKinsey Quarterly, November. Retrieved from www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/preparing-for-a-new-era-of-work.Google Scholar
Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, S139–S157.Google Scholar
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Batra, P., Ko, R., & Sanghvi, S. (2017, November) What the future of work will mean for jobs, skills, and wages. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved November 15, 2017, from www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/future-of-organizations-and-work/what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wagesGoogle Scholar
Maurer, R. (2016a, January 14). Internet is primary resource for job seekers worldwide. Retrieved January 26, 2016, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/talent-acquisition/pages/internet-job-seekers-worldwide.aspxGoogle Scholar
Maurer, R. (2016b, February 2). The most sought-after talent prefer mobile recruitment. SHRM online. Retrieved February 14, 2016, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/talent-acquisition/pages/talent-prefer-mobile-recruitment.aspxGoogle Scholar
Maurer, R. (2017a, February 23). 2017 recruiting trends point to technology driving change. SHRM online. Retrieved February 25, 2017, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/talent-acquisition/pages/recruiting-trends-2017-technology-change.aspxGoogle Scholar
Maurer, R. (2017b, February 2). “Siri for recruiting” set to debut this year. SHRM online. Retrieved February 3, 2017, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/talent-acquisition/pages/siri-for-recruiting-debut-2017-hiringsolved.aspxGoogle Scholar
Maynard, M. T., Gilson, L., Jones-Young, N. C., and Vartiainen, M. (2017). Virtual teams. In Hertel, G., Stone, D., Johnson, R., and Passmore, J.. The psychology of the internet at work. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
McAfee, A., and Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, October, pp. 60–67.Google Scholar
McGovern, M. (2017). Thriving in the gig economy: How to capitalize and compete in the new world of work. Wayne, NJ: Career Press/New Page Books.Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute. (2016, February). Digital globalization: The new era of global flows. Retrieved April 7, 2016, from www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/digital-globalization-the-new-era-of-global-flowsGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. (2016, March 21). Private companies typically award an incentive pay mix. SHRM online. Retrieved March 22, 2016, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/compensation/pages/incentive-pay-mix.aspxGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M. (2017). Debrief: Ginni Rometty. Bloomberg Businessweek, September 25, pp. 62–65.Google Scholar
Murray, A. (2015, May 1). The new industrial revolution. Fortune, p. 6.Google Scholar
Olmstead, K., Lampe, C. & Ellison, N. B. (2016). Social media and the workplace. Pew Research Center. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from www.pewinternet.org/2016/06/22/social-media-and-the-workplace/Google Scholar
Overberg, P., & Adamy, J. (2018). Elderly in US are projected to outnumber children for first time. Wall Street Journal, March 13, p. A2.Google Scholar
Oxford Living Dictionaries. Retrieved December 29, 2016, from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/technologyGoogle Scholar
Parsi, N. (2017, January 16). Workplace diversity and inclusion gets innovative. SHRM online. Retrieved January 19, 2017, from www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/0217/pages/disrupting-diversity-in-the-workplace.aspxGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. M. (1998). Effects of realistic job previews on multiple organizational outcomes: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp. 673–690.Google Scholar
Posthuma, R. A., and Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35, 158–188.Google Scholar
Provencher, T. (2018, February 13). Viewpoint: How to encourage new employees to stick around. SHRM online. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/employee-relations/pages/viewpoint-how-to-encourage-new-employees-to-stick-around.aspxGoogle Scholar
PwC International. (2016). Millennials at work. Retrieved May 12, 2017, from www.pwc.com/gx/en/financial-services/publications/assets/pwc-millenials-at-work.pdfGoogle Scholar
Qi, L. (2017). China lays out population forecast. Wall Street Journal, January 26, p. A7.Google Scholar
Rathi, N., & Lee, K. (2017). Understanding the role of supervisor support in retaining employees and enhancing their satisfaction with life. Personnel Review, 46, 1605–1619.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. (2013). The benefits of big data. HRMagazine, October, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, . (2015). Myths about millennials. The Economist, August 1. Retrieved from www.economist.com/node/21660110#printGoogle Scholar
Silverman, R. E. (2016). Bosses tap outside firms to predict which workers might get sick. Wall Street Journal, February 16. Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/bosses-harness-big-data-to-predict-which-workers-might-get-sick-1455664940Google Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management. (2016, January 19). Managing and leveraging workplace use of social media. SHRM online. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and samples/toolkits/Pages/managingsocialmedia.aspxGoogle Scholar
Spain, E., & Groysberg, B. (2016). Making exit interviews count. Harvard Business Review, April, 88–95.Google Scholar
Staff.com. (2016). Social media for recruitment – infographic. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from https://blog.staff.com/social-media-for-recruitment-infographic/Google Scholar
Statista. (2017). The most famous social network sites worldwide as of September 2017, ranked by number of active users (in millions). Retrieved January 10, 2018, from www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/Google Scholar
Tanwar, K., & Prasad, A. (2016). Exploring the relationship between employer branding and employee retention. Global Business Review, 17(3S), 186S–206S.Google Scholar
The first world is aging. (2015). Fortune, October 1, p. 16.Google Scholar
Tian, X., Harvey, M., & Slocum, J. W. (2014). The retention of Chinese managers: The Chinese puzzle box. Organizational Dynamics, 43(1), 44–52.Google Scholar
Truxillo, D. M., Cadiz, D. M., & Hammer, L. B. (2015). Supporting the aging workforce: A review and recommendations for workplace intervention research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 351–381.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 201–210.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015, December). Women in the labor force: A databook. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/archive/women-in-the-labor-force-a-databook-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
Volpone, S. D., Thomas, K. M., Sinisterra, P., and Johnson, L. (2014). Targeted recruiting: Identifying future employees. In Yu, K. Y. T. and Cable, D. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of recruitment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 110–125.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2012). Meet the new boss: Big data. Companies trade in hunch-based hiring for computer modeling. Wall Street Journal, September 20, pp. B1, B2.Google Scholar
Weber, J. (2014). Should companies monitor their employees’ social media? Wall Street Journal, October 22. Retrieved May 17, 2015, from www.wsj.com/articles/should-companies-monitor-their-employees-social-media-1399648685Google Scholar
World Economic Forum & Boston Consulting Group. (2011). Global talent risk – Seven responses. Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, A. (2015). The Icarus syndrome meets the wearable revolution. Korn/Ferry Briefings on Talent and Leadership, 6, pp. 27–33.Google Scholar
Wright, A. D. (2017a, March 6). Social postings still land employees in hot water. SHRM online. Retrieved March 8, 2017, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/social-postings-still-land-employees-in-hot-water.aspxGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. D. (2017b, August 25). Job seekers are frustrated with automated recruiting. SHRM online. Retrieved August 26, 2017, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/candidates-soured-too-much-technology.aspxGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, D. (2015, October 1). 7 reasons to love your ATS. SHRM online. Retrieved October 3, 2015, from www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/pages/1015-applicant-tracking-systems.aspxGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, D. (2016). An HRM for everyone. HR Magazine, 61(10), 47–50.Google Scholar
Zielinski, D. (2017, February 13). Recruiting gets smart thanks to artificial intelligence. SHRM online. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/recruiting-gets-smart-thanks-to-artificial-intelligence.aspxGoogle Scholar

References

Abu-Doleh, J., & Weir, D. (2007). Dimensions of performance appraisal systems in Jordanian private and public organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 75–84.Google Scholar
Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 219–252.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance management (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Akuratiyagamage, V. M. (2005). Identification of management development needs: A comparison across companies of different ownership – foreign, joint venture and local in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1512–1528.Google Scholar
Atwater, L., Smither, J. W., Wang, M., & Fleenor, J. W. (2009). Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others’ ratings of leadership? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 876–886.Google Scholar
Ayers, R. S. (2013). Building goal alignment in federal agencies’ performance appraisal programs. Public Personnel Management, 42, 495–520.Google Scholar
Balfour, D. L. (1992). Impact of agency investment in the implementation of performance appraisal. Public Personnel Management, 92, 1–15.Google Scholar
Barua, A., & Viechnicki, P. (2017). Looking for convergence: How is the government workforce similar to the private sector? Deloitte Insights, April 26.Google Scholar
Becker, K., Antuar, N., & Everett, C. (2011). Implementing an employee performance management system in a nonprofit organization. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21, 255–271.Google Scholar
Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 283–299.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197–208.Google Scholar
Bouskila-Yam, O., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Strength-based performance appraisal and goal setting. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 137–147.Google Scholar
Bretz, R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18, 321–352.Google Scholar
Brown, T. C., & Warren, A. M. (2011). Performance management in unionized settings. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 96–106.Google Scholar
Buckingham, M., & Goodall, A. (2015). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93, 40–50.Google Scholar
Burke, R. J., & Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 86–94.Google Scholar
Cabrera, D. D., Fernaud, E. H., Díaz, R. I., Rodríguez, N. D., Vilela, L. D., & Sánchez, C. R. (2014). Factores relevantes para aumentar la precisión, la viabilidad y el éxito de los sistemas de evaluación del desempeño laboral. Papeles del Psicólogo, 35, 115–121.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P., & Tavis, A. (2016). The performance management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 94, 58–67.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2006). 10 global performance management systems. In Stahl, G. K. & Björkman, I. (Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management (pp. 176–196). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615–633.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., & Kemp, S. (2012). Lie hard: The effect of self-assessments on academic promotion decisions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 578–589.Google Scholar
Clarke, C., Harcourt, M., & Flynn, M. (2012). Clinical governance, performance appraisal and interactional and procedural fairness at a New Zealand public hospital. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 667–678.Google Scholar
Claus, L., & Briscoe, D. (2009). Employee performance management across borders: A review of relevant academic literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 175–196.Google Scholar
Collins-Camargo, C., Chuang, E., McBeath, B., & Bunger, A. C. (2014). Private child welfare agency managers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of different performance management strategies. Children and Youth Services Review, 38, 133–141.Google Scholar
Colquitt, A. L. (2017). Next generation performance management: The triumph of science over myth and superstition. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Dahling, J. J., Chau, S. L., & O’Malley, A. (2012). Correlates and consequences of feedback orientation in organizations. Journal of Management, 38, 531–546.Google Scholar
Decramer, A., Smolders, C., & Vanderstraeten, A. (2013). Employee performance management culture and system features in higher education: Relationship with employee performance management satisfaction. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 352–371.Google Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
den Hartog, D. N., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2004). Performance management: A model and research agenda. Applied Psychology, 53, 556–569.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A. S., & Pritchard, R. D. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2, 253–277.Google Scholar
Duff, A. J. (2013). Performance management coaching: Servant leadership and gender implications. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34, 204–221.Google Scholar
Dunn, M., & Walker, J. ((2016). Union membership in the United States. Spotlight on Statistics, US Bureau of Labor Statistics (September).Google Scholar
Effron, M., & Ort, M. (2010). One page talent management: Eliminating complexity, adding value. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. R. (2012). Exploring cultural dimensions as predictors of performance management preferences: The case of self-initiating expatriate New Zealanders in Belgium. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 2087–2107.Google Scholar
Fee, A., McGrath-Champ, S., & Yang, X. (2011). Expatriate performance management and firm internationalization: Australian multinationals in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 49, 365–384.Google Scholar
Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 473–487.Google Scholar
Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Switzer, I. S. (2015). Forced distribution rating systems: When does “rank and yank” lead to adverse impact?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 180–193.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., Parker, S., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62, 31–55.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2010). Employee coaching relationships: Enhancing construct clarity and measurement. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3, 109–123.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2011). It’s not me, it’s you: A multilevel examination of variables that impact employee coaching relationships. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63, 67–88.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2012). Employee feedback orientation: Implications for effective coaching relationships. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 5, 86–99.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. B., Levy, P. E., & Jeffers, M. (2008). Development of a model of the feedback process within executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60, 42–56.Google Scholar
Greguras, G. J., Robie, C., Schleicher, D. J., & Goff, M. III (2003). A field study of the effects of rating purpose on the quality of multisource ratings. Personnel Psychology, 56, 1–21.Google Scholar
Haines, V. Y., & St-Onge, S. (2012). Performance management effectiveness: Practices or context? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 1158–1175.Google Scholar
Hebert, B. G., & Vorauer, J. D. (2003). Seeing through the screen: Is evaluative feedback communicated more effectively in face-to-face or computer-mediated exchanges? Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 25–38.Google Scholar
Hedge, J. W., & Borman, W. C. (1995). Changing conceptions and practices in performance appraisal. In Howard, A. (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 451–481). San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hernandez, M., Avery, D. R., Tonidandel, S., Hebl, M. R., Smith, A. N., & McKay, P. F. (2016). The role of proximal social contexts: Assessing stigma-by-association effects on leader appraisals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 68–85.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2009). Disentangling the meaning of multisource performance rating source and dimension factors. Personnel Psychology, 62, 735–765.Google Scholar
Ilgen, D. R., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & McKellin, D. B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 321–368.Google Scholar
Inderrieden, E. J., Allen, R. E., & Keaveny, T. J. (2004). Managerial discretion in the use of self-ratings in an appraisal system: The antecedents and consequences. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16, 460–482.Google Scholar
Irs, R., & Turk, K. (2012). Implementation of the performance-related pay in the general education schools of Estonia. Employee Relations, 34, 360–393.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (2018). Advances in the treatment of context in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior.Google Scholar
Kacik, A. (2017, October). Healthcare industry to create four million jobs by 2026. Modern Healthcare. www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20171027/NEWS/171029879Google Scholar
Kamer, B., & Annen, H. (2010). The role of core self-evaluations in predicting performance appraisal reactions. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 95–104.Google Scholar
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, P., Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2007). Understanding performance appraisal fairness. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45, 132–150.Google Scholar
Keeping, L. M. & Levy, P. E. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85,708–723.Google Scholar
Kinicki, A. J., Jacobson, K. J., Peterson, S. J., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). Development and validation of the performance management behavior questionnaire. Personnel Psychology, 66, 1–45.Google Scholar
Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B. J., & McKee-Ryan, F. M. (2004). A covariance structure analysis of employees’ response to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1057–1069.Google Scholar
Klein, H. J., Snell, S. A., & Wexley, K. N. (1987). Systems model of the performance appraisal interview process. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 26, 267–280.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, A., van Tuijl, H., & Algera, J. A. (2004). Participation in the design of performance management systems: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 831–851.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & Nir, D. (2010). The feedforward interview. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 235–246.Google Scholar
Knoke, D. (2000). Changing organizations: Business networks in the new political economy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krauss, A., & Snyder, L. A. (2009). Technology and performance management: What role does technology play in performance management? In Smither, J. W. & London, M. (Eds.), Performance management: Putting research into action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kurtzberg, T. R., Naquin, C. E., & Belkin, L. Y. (2005). Electronic performance appraisals: The effects of e-mail communication on peer ratings in actual and simulated environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 216–226.Google Scholar
Latham, G. P., Budworth, M., Yanar, B., & Whyte, G. (2008). The influence of a manager’s own performance appraisal on the evaluation of others. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 220–228.Google Scholar
Lawler, E. E. (2003). Reward practices and performance management system effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 32, 396–404.Google Scholar
Lawler, E. E., & McDermott, M. (2003). Current performance management practices: Examining the varying impacts. World at Work Journal, 12, 49–60.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, S. (2016). After overhauling its performance review system, IBM now uses an app to give and receive real-time feedback. Business Insider, May 20. Retrieved from www.businessinsider.com/ibm-now-uses-the-ace-app-to-give-and-receive-real-time-feedback-2016-5Google Scholar
Lee, G., & Jimenez, B. S. (2011). Does performance management affect job turnover intention in the federal government? American Review of Public Administration, 41, 168–184.Google Scholar
Levy, P. E., Tseng, S. T., Rosen, C. C., & Lueke, S. B. (2017). Performance management: A marriage between practice and science – Just say “I do.” In Buckley, M. R., Wheeler, A. R., & Halbesleben, J. R. B. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management , Vol. 35 (pp. 155–213). Bingley, West Yorkshire, England: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30, 881–905.Google Scholar
Lievens, F., Conway, J. M., & De Corte, W. (2008). The relative importance of task, citizenship and counterproductive performance to job performance ratings: Do rater source and team-based culture matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 11–27.Google Scholar
Linderbaum, B. A., & Levy, P. E. (2010). The development and validation of the feedback orientation scale (FOS). Journal of Management, 36, 1372–1405.Google Scholar
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 81–100.Google Scholar
Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785.Google Scholar
Mamatoglu, N. (2008). Effects on organizational context (culture and climate) from implementing a 360-degree feedback system: The case of Arcelik. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 426–449.Google Scholar
Medcof, J. W., & Song, L. J. (2013). Exploration, exploitation and human resource management practices in cooperative and entrepreneurial HR configurations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2911–2926.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. (2003). High tech and high performance: Managing appraisal in the information age. Journal of Labor Research, 24, 409–424.Google Scholar
Mok, A., Cheng, C. Y., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Matching versus mismatching cultural norms in performance appraisal: Effects of the cultural setting and bicultural identity integration. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10, 17–35.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35–51.Google Scholar
Ng, K. Y., Koh, C., Ang, S., Kennedy, J. C., & Chan, K. Y. (2011). Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism–collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1033–1044.Google Scholar
Norris-Watts, C., & Levy, P. E. (2004). The mediating role of affective commitment in the relation of the feedback environment to work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 351–365.Google Scholar
Nurse, L. (2005). Performance appraisal, employee development and organizational justice: Exploring the linkages. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1176–1194.Google Scholar
Payne, S. C., Horner, M. T., Boswell, W. R., Schroeder, A. N., & Stine-Cheyne, K. J. (2009). Comparison of online and traditional performance appraisal systems. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 526–544.Google Scholar
Payne, S. C., & Mendoza, A. (2017, April). Performance ratings: Does case law reveal more harm than good? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Peretz, H., & Fried, Y. (2012). National cultures, performance appraisal practices, and organizational absenteeism and turnover: A study across 21 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 448–459.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262–270.Google Scholar
Rahman, S. A. (2006). Attitudes of Malaysian teachers toward a performance-appraisal system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 3031–3042.Google Scholar
Randall, R., & Sharples, D. (2012). The impact of rater agreeableness and rating context on the evaluation of poor performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 42–59.Google Scholar
Rego, A., Marques, C., Leal, S., Sousa, F., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2010). Psychological capital and performance of Portuguese civil servants: Exploring neutralizers in the context of an appraisal system. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1531–1552.Google Scholar
Rodwell, J. J., & Teo, S. T. T. (2008). The influence of strategic HRM and sector on perceived performance in health services organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 1825–1841.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. A., Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., Fritzsche, B. A., Salas, E., & Burke, C. S. (2011). Managing adaptive performance in teams: Guiding principles and behavioral markers for measurement. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 107–122.Google Scholar
Saffie-Robertson, M. C., & Brutus, S. (2014). The impact of interdependence on performance evaluations: The mediating role of discomfort with performance appraisal. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 459–473.Google Scholar
Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018). Putting the system into performance management systems: A review and agenda for performance management research. Journal of Management, 44, 2209–2245.Google Scholar
Schleicher, D. J., Bull, R. A., & Green, S. G. (2009). Rater reactions to forced distribution rating systems. Journal of Management, 35, 899–927.Google Scholar
Selvarajan, T. T., & Cloninger, P. A. (2012). Can performance appraisals motivate employees to improve performance? A Mexican study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 3063–3084.Google Scholar
Shore, T. H., & Tashchian, A. (2002). Accountability forces in performance appraisal: Effects of self-appraisal information, normative information, and task performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 261–274.Google Scholar
Shore, T. H., & Tashchian, A. (2007). Effects of feedback accountability and self-rating information on employee appraisals: A replication and extension. Psychological Reports, 100, 1091–1100.Google Scholar
Shrivastava, A., & Purang, P. (2011). Employee perceptions of performance appraisals: A comparative study on Indian banks. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 632–647.Google Scholar
Silva, P., & Tosi, H. L. (2004). Determinants of the anonymity of the CEO evaluation process. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16, 87–102.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Mohamed, A. F., & Darwish, T. (2013). A comparative study of performance appraisals, incentives and rewards practices in domestic and multinational enterprises in the country of Brunei Darussalam. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 3577–3598.Google Scholar
Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta‐analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58, 33–66.Google Scholar
Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 165–184.Google Scholar
Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. (2009). Identifying acceptable performance appraisal criteria: An international perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47, 102–125.Google Scholar
Tsai, C., & Wang, W. (2013). Exploring the factors associated with employees’ perceived appraisal accuracy: A study of Chinese state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2197–2220.Google Scholar
Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2012). Importance of system and leadership in performance appraisal. Personnel Review, 41, 756–776.Google Scholar
Tziner, A., Murphy, K. R., Cleveland, J. N., & Roberts-Thompson, G. P. (2001). Relationships between attitudes toward organizations and performance appraisal systems and rating behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 226–239.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Nijhof, A. H. J. (2004). The value of subjectivity: Problems and prospects for 360-degree appraisal systems. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 493–511.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, R. M., Overeem, K., Arah, O. A., Heineman, M. J., & Lombarts, K. M. J. M. H. (2013). Frequency and determinants of residents’ narrative feedback on the teaching performance of faculty: Narratives in numbers. Academic Medicine, 88, 1324–1331.Google Scholar
Varma, A., Pichler, S., & Srinivas, E. S. (2005). The role of interpersonal affect in performance appraisal: Evidence from two samples – the US and India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 2029–2044.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Tseng, J., Yen, Y., Huang, I. (2011). University staff performance evaluation systems, organizational learning, and organizational identification in Taiwan. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 43–54.Google Scholar
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management, 44, 352–386.Google Scholar
Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 125–139.Google Scholar
Williams, M. J. (1997). Performance appraisal is dead. Long live performance management. Harvard Management Update, 2, 1–6.Google Scholar
Woehr, D. J., Sheehan, M. K., & Bennett, W. (2005). Assessing measurement equivalence across rating sources: A multitrait–multirater approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 592–600.Google Scholar
Youngcourt, S. S., Leiva, P. I., & Jones, R. G. (2007). Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual- and position-focused purposes on attitudinal outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 315–343.Google Scholar

References

Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12, 215–234. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.2.215.10117Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. T., Ford, J. K., & Blume, B. D. (2017). The state of transfer of training research: Moving toward more consumer‐centric inquiry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28, 17–28. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21278Google Scholar
Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (2007). How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement and worker skills. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1721–1758. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1721Google Scholar
Beier, M. E. (2008). International review of industrial and organizational psychology. In Hodgkinson, G. P. & Ford, J. K. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2008. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Beier, M. E., Teachout, M. S., & Cox, C. B. (2012). The training and development of an aging workforce. In Borman, W. C. & Hedge, J. W. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 436–453). New York, NY: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bell, B. S., Tannenbaum, S. I., Ford, J. K., Noe, R. A., & Kraiger, K. (2017). 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 305–323. doi: 10.1037/apl0000142Google Scholar
Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994). Changes in the demand for skilled labor within US manufacturing: evidence from the annual survey of manufactures. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 367–397.Google Scholar
Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1227–1274. doi: 10.1037/bul0000067Google Scholar
Bird, A., Mendenhall, M., Stevens, M. J., & Oddou, G. (2010). Defining the content domain of intercultural competence for global leaders. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 810–828. doi: 10.1108/02683941011089107Google Scholar
Black, J. S., & Mendenhall, M. (1990). Cross-cultural training effectiveness: A review and a theoretical framework for future research. Academy of Management Review, 15, 113–136. doi: 10.2307/258109Google Scholar
Bonet, R., Cappelli, P., & Hamori, M. (2013). Labor market intermediaries and the new paradigm for human resources. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 339–390. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.774213Google Scholar
Boothby, D., Dufour, A., & Tang, J. (2010). Technology adoption, training and productivity performance. Research Policy, 39, 650–661. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.011Google Scholar
Boudreau, J. W., & Ramstad, P. M. (2005). Talentship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. Human Resource Management, 44, 129–136. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20054Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics (No. w24001). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w24001Google Scholar
Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2008). A study of best practices in training transfer and proposed model of transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19, 107–128. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1230Google Scholar
Burke, R. J., & Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.006Google Scholar
Callahan, J. S., Kiker, D. S., & Cross, T. (2003). Does method matter? A meta-analysis of the effects of training method on older learner training performance. Journal of Management, 29, 663–680. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00029-1Google Scholar
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Rhodenizer, L., Salas, E., & Bowers, C. A. (1998). A framework for understanding pre‐practice conditions and their impact on learning. Personnel Psychology, 51, 291–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00727.xGoogle Scholar
Carnevale, A. P., Strohl, J., & Gulish, A. (2015). College is just the beginning: Employers’ role in the $1.1 trillion postsecondary education and training system (Report No. ED558166). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED558166.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2019). Training trends: Macro, micro, and policy issues. Human Resource Management Review, 29, 284–297.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349–375. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352Google Scholar
Charness, N. (2009). Skill acquisition in older adults: Psychological mechanisms. In Czaja, S. J. & Sharit, J. (Eds.), Aging and work (pp. 232–258). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chebium, R. (2015, January 7). How to create an effective cross-cultural training program. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/pages/010215-cross-cultural-training.aspxGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835–847. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835Google Scholar
Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 945–974. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.945Google Scholar
Cross, R., Rebele, R., & Grant, A. (2016). Collaborative overload. Harvard Business Review, 94, 74–79.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, 94(7), 14.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2018). Charge statistics. Retrieved from www1.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfmGoogle Scholar
Gatta, M. (2008). Low-skill workers, technology, and education: A new vision for workforce development policy. Economic & Labour Relations Review, 19, 109–127. doi: 10.1177/103530460801900108Google Scholar
Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, K. J. (1993). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.Google Scholar
Haccoun, R. R., & Hamtiaux, T. (1994). Optimizing knowledge tests for inferring learning acquisition levels in single group training evaluation designs: The internal referencing strategy. Personnel Psychology, 47, 593–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01739.xGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, C., & Mogford, E. (2009). Immigration and the American industrial revolution from 1880 to 1920. Social Science Research, 38, 897–920. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.001Google Scholar
Hughes, A. M., Gregory, M. E., Joseph, D. L., Sonesh, S. C., Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., … & Salas, E. (2016). Saving lives: A meta-analysis of team training in healthcare. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1266–1304. doi: 10.1037/apl0000120Google Scholar
Job, M. A., & Ogalo, H. S. (2012). Micro-learning as innovative process of knowledge strategy. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 1(11). Retrieved from www.ijstr.org/final-print/dec2012/Micro-Learning-As-Innovative-Process-Of-Knowledge-Strategy.pdfGoogle Scholar
Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2008). Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 59–69. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.59Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. (Original work published 1959.)Google Scholar
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kraiger, K. (2002). Decision-based evaluation. In Kraiger, K. (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and maintaining effective training and development: State-of-the-art lessons for practice (pp. 331–375). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kraiger, K. (2008). Transforming our models of learning and development: Web‐based instruction as enabler of third‐generation instruction. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 454–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00086.xGoogle Scholar
Kraiger, K. (2014). Looking back and looking forward: Trends in training and development research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25, 401–408. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21203Google Scholar
Kubeck, J. E., Delp, N. D., Haslett, T. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Does job-related training performance decline with age? Psychology and Aging, 11, 92–107. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.92Google Scholar
Lacerenza, C. N., Reyes, D. L., Marlow, S. L., Joseph, D. L., & Salas, E. (2017). Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi: 10.1037/apl0000241Google Scholar
Landers, R. N., & Armstrong, M. B. (2017). Enhancing instructional outcomes with gamification: An empirical test of the Technology-Enhanced Training Effectiveness Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 499–507. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.031Google Scholar
Lim, H., Lee, S.-G., & Nam, K. (2007). Validating E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 27, 22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.08.002Google Scholar
Malone, T. (2004). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style, and your life. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Martin, H. J. (2010). Workplace climate and peer support as determinants of training transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21, 87–104. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.20038Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 371–383. doi: 10.3102/00346543049002371Google Scholar
McGovern, M. (2017). Thriving in the gig economy: How to capitalize and compete in the new world of work. Wayne, NJ: Career Press.Google Scholar
Moseley, J. L., & Dessigner, J. C. (2007). Training older workers and learners: Maximizing the performance of an aging workforce. San Francisco, CA: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 281–292. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4Google Scholar
Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736–749. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1986.4283922Google Scholar
Noe, R. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2002). Planning for training impact: Principles of training effectiveness. In Kraiger, K. (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development (pp. 53–79). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ouadahi, J. (2008). A qualitative analysis of factors associated with user acceptance and rejection of a new workplace information system in the public sector: A conceptual model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25, 201–213. doi: 10.1002/cjas.65Google Scholar
PayScale (2016). 2016 workforce-skills preparedness report. Seattle, WA: PayScale, Inc. Retrieved from www.payscale.com/data-packages/job-skillsGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. J. (2012). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 199–220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037Google Scholar
Quiñones, M. A., Ford, J. K., Sego, D. J., & Smith, E. M. (1995). The effects of individual and transfer environment characteristics on the opportunity to perform trained tasks. Training Research Journal, 1, 29–48.Google Scholar
Rau, B. L., & Hyland, M. A. M. (2002). Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55, 111–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00105.xGoogle Scholar
Roberson, L., Kulik, C. T., & Tan, R. Y. (2012). Effective diversity training. In Roberson, Q. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of diversity and work (pp. 341–365). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robles, M. M. (2012). Executive perceptions of the top soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Business Communication Quarterly, 75, 453–465. doi: 10.1177/1080569912460400Google Scholar
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471Google Scholar
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. doi: 10.1177/1529100612436661Google Scholar
Senge, P. M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., & Smith, B. J. (2014). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Simon, S. J., & Werner, J. M. (1996). Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 648–659. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.648Google Scholar
Singh, P. (2008). Job analysis for a changing workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 87–99. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.004Google Scholar
Sitzmann, T., Bell, B. S., Kraiger, K., & Kanar, A. M. (2009). A multilevel analysis of the effect of prompting self‐regulation in technology‐delivered instruction. Personnel Psychology, 62, 697–734. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01155.xGoogle Scholar
Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.xGoogle Scholar
Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39, 303–327. doi: 10.1177/1046496408317794Google Scholar
Sommers, D., & Franklin, J. C. (2012). Overview of projections to 2020. Monthly Labor Review, 135(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759–769. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.759Google Scholar
Toossi, M. (2012). Projections of the labor force to 2050: A visual essay. Monthly Labor Review, 135(10), 3–16.Google Scholar
Tracey, J. B., Hinkin, T. R., Tannenbaum, S., & Mathieu, J. E. (2001). The influence of individual characteristics and the work environment on varying levels of training outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 5–23.Google Scholar
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. E., Cavanagh, T. M., & Kraiger, K. (2014). Older adults and technology-based instruction: Optimizing learning outcomes and transfer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 26–44. doi: 10.5465/amle.2012.0056Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. E., & Kraiger, K. (2014). Cognitive aging and training: The role of instructional coherence and advance organizers. Experimental Aging Research, 40, 164–186. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2014.882206Google Scholar
Yan, B. (2006). Demand for skills in Canada: the role of foreign outsourcing and information‐communication technology. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 39(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
Young, C. K. (2017). Age and training: A meta-analysis examining training features (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (Accession No. 2018-13260-247).Google Scholar

References

Alton, L. (2018, January 24). Why the gig economy is the best and worst development for workers under 30. Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/larryalton/2018/01/24/Google Scholar
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–665.Google Scholar
Anonymous. (2018). Pay Equity & Discrimination. Retrieved June 21, 2018, from https://iwpr.org/issue/employment-education-economic-change/pay-equity-discrimination/Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A., & Einstein, W. O. (1988). Transformational leadership in a management game simulation. Group & Organization Management, 13(1), 59–80.Google Scholar
Bagger, J., & Li, A. (2014). How does supervisory family support influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective. Journal of Management, 40(4), 1123–1150.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E. (1966). Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11, 238–263.Google Scholar
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U. (n.d.). STEM 101: Intro to tomorrow’s jobs. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/ooqGoogle Scholar
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288–307.Google Scholar
Burke, R. J., & Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 86–94.Google Scholar
Center for American Progress. (2017). The women’s leadership gap. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from www.americanprogress.org/issues/women/reports/2017/05/21/432758/womens-leadership-gap/Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Wade, M., & Jordan, J. (2018). As AI makes more decisions, the nature of leadership will change. Harvard Business Review, 2–7. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/01/as-ai-makes-more-decisions-the-nature-of-leadership-will-changeGoogle Scholar
Cox, T. H., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45–56.Google Scholar
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52.Google Scholar
Drescher, M. A., Korsgaard, M. A., Welpe, I. M., Picot, A., & Wigand, R. T. (2014). The dynamics of shared leadership: Building trust and enhancing performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 771–783.Google Scholar
Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managed work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435–457.Google Scholar
Dussauge, P., & Garrette, B. (1999). Cooperative strategy: Competing successfully through strategic alliances. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dvir, T., & Shamir, B. (2003). Follower developmental characteristics as predicting transformational leadership: A longitudinal field study. Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 327–344.Google Scholar
Economist, (2017). The future of work. Artificial intelligence: Anything you can do, AI can do better. So how will it change the workplace? Retrieved June 22, 2018, from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BFG_OxtrgHcJ:learnmore.economist.com/story/Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2014). What’s next: Future global trends affecting your organization. Evolution of work and the worker. New York, NY: SHRM Foundation and Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/Documents/Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.Google Scholar
Ekvall, G., & Arvonen, J. (1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7, 17–26.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33, 290–320.Google Scholar
Fleishman, E. A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Personnel Psychology, 37, 1–6.Google Scholar
Forbes Coaches Council (2017). What can your organization do to become more innovative? Retrieved June 12, 2018, from www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2017/07/13/what-can-your-organization-do-to-become-more-innovative/#55d311cf4bfaGoogle Scholar
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Retrieved from www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fried, J., & Hansson, D. H. (2013). Remote: Office not required. London, UK: The Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727.Google Scholar
Gentry, W. A., Griggs, T. L., Deal, J. J., Mondore, S. P., & Cox, B. D. (2011). A comparison of generational differences in endorsement of leadership practices with actual leadership skill level. Consulting Psychology Journal, 63(1), 39–49.Google Scholar
Gil, F., Rico, R., Alcover, C. M., & Barrasa, Á. (2005). Change‐oriented leadership, satisfaction and performance in work groups. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3/4), 312–328.Google Scholar
Giles, M. (2018). Six cyber threats to really worry about in 2018. Retrieved June 12, 2018, from www.technologyreview.com/s/609641/six-cyber-threats-to-really-worry-about-in-2018/Google Scholar
Global Alliance Game | Carpenter Strategy Toolbox. (2012). Retrieved July 24, 2018, from https://carpenterstrategytoolbox.com/2012/07/25/global-alliance-game/Google Scholar
Golden, T. D. (2006). Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 176–187.Google Scholar
Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting’s differential impact on work–family conflict: Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1340–1350.Google Scholar
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: the rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317–375.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Grinyer, P. H., Mayes, D., & McKiernan, P. (1990). The sharpbenders: Achieving a sustained improvement in performance. Long Range Planning, 23, 116–125.Google Scholar
Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134–45.Google Scholar
Halpin, A. W., & Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In Stogdill, R. M. & Coons, A. E. (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus, OH: Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Hand, H. H., & Slocum, J. W. (1972). A longitudinal study of the effect of a human relations training program on managerial effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 412–418.Google Scholar
Hansson, D. H. (2013). A new workplace manifesto: In praise of freedom, time, space, and work. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from www.fastcompany.com/3020833/a-new-luxury-manifesto-in-praise-of-freedom-time-space-and-working-remotelyGoogle Scholar
Hassan, R., Prussia, G., Mahsud, R., & Yukl, G. (2018). How leader networking, external monitoring, and representing are relevant for effective leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(4), 454–467.Google Scholar
Hearn, S. (2016). The modern challenges of managing remote performance. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from www.entrepreneur.com/article/284150Google Scholar
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1984). The management of organizational behavior (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., Maldagen-Youngjohn, R., & Lyons, B. D. (2011). Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 347–381.Google Scholar
House, R. J. (1971). A path–goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321–339.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51.Google Scholar
Katz, R. L. (1955). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 33–42.Google Scholar
Kelly, B. K. (2015). The aging workforce: Four steps to maximize older workers in your organization. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Kenan-Flager Business School, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Kim, H., & Yukl, G. (1995). Relationships of self-reported and subordinate-reported leadership behaviors to managerial effectiveness and advancement. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 361–377.Google Scholar
Kinicki, A., & Fugate, M. (2018). Organizational behavior: A practical, problem-solving approach (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Knight, R. (2015). How to manage remote direct reports. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 2–6. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=118666569&site=ehost-liveGoogle Scholar
Kolbjørnsrud, V., Amico, R., & Thomas, R. J. (2016). How artificial intelligence will redefine management. Harvard Business Review, July, 1–7. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/11/how-artificial-intelligence-will-redefine-managementGoogle Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Hammer, L. B., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2014). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support, workplace social support and work–family conflict construct definitions and linkages. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. Health Care Manager, 19, 65–76.Google Scholar
Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. (1979). The application of social learning theory to training supervisors through behavioral modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 239–246.Google Scholar
Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 857–861.Google Scholar
Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395.Google Scholar
Michel, J. W., Lyons, B. D., & Cho, J. (2010). Is the full-range model of leadership really a full-range model of effective leader behavior? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(4), 493–507.Google Scholar
Michel, J. W., & Tews, M. J. (2016). Does leader–member exchange accentuate the relationship between leader behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
Michel, J. W., Tews, M. J. & Allen, D. G. (2019). Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 29, 98–110.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Misumi, J., & Peterson, M. (1985). The performance-maintenance (PM) theory of leadership: Review of a Japanese research program. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 198–223.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750.Google Scholar
Mumford, T. V., Campion, M. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). The leadership skills strataplex: Leadership skill requirements across organizational levels. Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 154–166.Google Scholar
Ortman, J. M., Velkoff, V. A., & Hogan, H. (2014). An aging nation: The older population in the United States population estimates and projections current population reports. Retrieved from www.census.gov/populationGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K., Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Managing the global workforce: Challenges and strategies. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 93–106.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personal Psychology, 40, 437–453.Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Salvaggio, A. N., & Subirats, M. (2002). Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 220–229.Google Scholar
Seifert, C. F., & Yukl, G. (2010). Effects of repeated multi-source feedback on the influence behavior and effectiveness of managers: A field experiment. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 856–866.Google Scholar
SHRM Foundation (2014a). The aging workforce – state of older workers in US organizations. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
SHRM Foundation (2014b). What’s next: Future global trends affecting your organization. Evolution of work and the worker. New York, NY: Society for Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
Strauss, K. (2017, March 8). 10 great “gig economy” jobs for 2017. Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2017/03/08/10-great-gig-economy-jobs-for-2017/#1403e24c25c9Google Scholar
Tkaczyk, C. (2013). Marissa Mayer breaks her silence on Yahoo’s telecommuting policy. Fortune. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from http://fortune.com/2013/04/19/marissa-mayer-breaks-her-silence-on-yahoos-telecommuting-policy/Google Scholar
Toossi, M. (2016). A look at the future of the US labor force to 2060. Spotlight on Statistics: US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved June 22, 2018, from www.bls.gov/spotlight/2016/a-look-at-the-future-of-the-us-labor-force-to-2060/home.htmGoogle Scholar
UK Essays, (2015). Why have strategic alliances grown in popularity? Retrieved June 13, 2018, from www.ukessays.com/essays/business-strategy/strategic-alliances-is-the-cause-of-popularity.phpGoogle Scholar
US Census Bureau. (2017). Educational attainment in the United States. Retrieved June 21, 2018, from www.census.gov/data/tables/2017/demo/education-attainment/cps-detailed-tables.htmlGoogle Scholar
Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Ware, J. (2011). The changing nature of work: What’s in it for me? Retrieved June 22, 2018, from www.Slideshare.Net/Jpware/The-Changing-Nature-Of-Work-Whats-In-It-For-MeGoogle Scholar
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management, 44(1), 352–386.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 33–49.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 66–85.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15–32.Google Scholar
Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R. (2005). Why integrating the leading and managing roles is essential for organizational effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 361–375.Google Scholar
Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible, adaptive leadership is important. Consulting Psychology Journal, 62(2), 81–93.Google Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., Gilbert, J. A., Thor, K. K., & Mumford, M. D. (1991). Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perspectiveness and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 317–342.Google Scholar

References

Ackers, M. (2017). One unit standing together: Police and firefighters learned from past tragedies, using different tactic to save lives. Las Vegas Sun, October 22. Retrieved from https://lasvegassun.com/news/2017/oct/22/one-unit-standing-together-police-and-firefighters/Google Scholar
Aime, F., Humphrey, S., DeRue, D. S., & Paul, J. B. (2014). The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 327–352.Google Scholar
Asencio, R., Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Fiore, S. M. (2012). Charting a course for collaboration: A multiteam perspective. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2(4), 487–494.Google Scholar
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004.Google Scholar
Beck, T. E., & Plowman, D. A. 2014. Temporary, emergent interorganizational collaboration in unexpected circumstances: A study of the Columbia space shuttle response effort. Organization Science, 25, 1234–1252.Google Scholar
Bell, S. T., Brown, S. G., Colaneri, A., & Outland, N. (2018). Team composition and the ABCs of teamwork. American Psychologist, 73(4), 349–362.Google Scholar
Bertolotti, F., Mattarelli, E., Mortensen, M., O’Leary, M., & Incerti, V. (2013). How many teams should we manage at once? The effect of multiple team membership, collaborative technologies, and polychronicity on team performance. 34th International Conference on Information Systems, December 15–18, 2013. Association for Information Systems, Milan, Italy. Retrieved from https://dblp.org/db/conf/icis/icis2013Google Scholar
Bui, L., Zapotosky, M., Barrett, D., & Berman, M. (2017). At least 59 killed in Las Vegas shooting rampage, more than 500 others injured. Washington Post, October 2. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/10/02/Google Scholar
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189–1207.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J. (2013). The quiet professional: An investigation of US military explosive ordnance disposal personnel interactions with everyday field robots (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234.Google Scholar
Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Braun, M. T., & Contractor, N. S. (2015). Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 597–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038922Google Scholar
Connaughton, S. L., Williams, E. A., & Shuffler, M. L. (2012). Social identity issues in multiteam systems: Considerations for future research. In Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & DeChurch, L. (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organization form for dynamic and complex environments (pp. 109–140). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Contractor, N. (2013). Some assembly required: Leveraging Web science to understand and enable team assembly. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 20120385. doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0385Google Scholar
Cox, J., Oh, E. Y., Simmons, B., Lintott, C., Masters, K., Greenhill, A., ... & Holmes, K. (2015). Defining and measuring success in online citizen science: A case study of Zooniverse projects. Computing in Science & Engineering, 17(4), 28–41.Google Scholar
Cullen-Lester, K. L., Maupin, C. K., & Carter, D. R. (2017). Incorporating social networks into leadership development: A conceptual model and evaluation of research and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 130–152.Google Scholar
Cunningham, S., Chellali, A., Jaffre, I., Classe, J., & Cao, C. G. (2013). Effects of experience and workplace culture in human–robot team interaction in robotic surgery: A case study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(1), 75–88.Google Scholar
Davison, R. B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Barnes, C. M., Sleesman, D. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2012). Coordinated action in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 808–824.Google Scholar
Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 857–880.Google Scholar
DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2006). Leadership in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 311–329.Google Scholar
De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549.Google Scholar
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627–647.Google Scholar
De Vries, T. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Davison, R. B., Walter, F., & Van der Vegt, G. S. (2016). Managing coordination in multiteam systems: Integrating micro and macro perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1823–1844.Google Scholar
D’Onfro, J. (2018, March 18). These Google employees used their “20 percent” time to improve Maps for people in wheelchairs. Business Insider. Retrieved from www.businessinsider.com/google-20-percent-time-policy-2015-4Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., & Harvey, J. F. (2018). Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 347–360.Google Scholar
Firth, B. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., Miles, J. E., Ilgen, D. R., & Barnes, C. M. (2015). Same page, different books: Extending representational gaps theory to enhance performance in multiteam systems. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 813–835.Google Scholar
Fortson, L., Masters, K., Nichol, R., Borne, K., Edmondson, E., Lintott, C., ... & Wallin, J. (2012). Galaxy zoo: Morphological classification and citizen science. In Way, M. J., Scargle, J. D., Ali, K. M., & Srivastava, A. N. (Eds.), Advances in machine learning and data mining for astronomy (pp. 213–236). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, T. L., Griffith, J. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2016). Collective leadership behaviors: Evaluating the leader, team network, and problem situation characteristics that influence their use. Leadership Quarterly, 27, 312–333.Google Scholar
Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 933–958.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(20), 1–35.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495.Google Scholar
Gittell, J. H., Godfrey, M., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2013). Interprofessional collaborative practice and relational coordination: Improving healthcare through relationships. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(3), 210–213.Google Scholar
Gombolay, M. C., Wilcox, R. J., & Shah, J. A. (2018). Fast scheduling of robot teams performing tasks with temporospatial constraints. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 34(1), 220–239.Google Scholar
Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., & Amazeen, P. G. (2010). Training adaptive teams. Human Factors, 52(2), 295–307.Google Scholar
Groom, V., & Nass, C. (2007). Can robots be teammates?: Benchmarks in human–robot teams. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 483–500.Google Scholar
Grossman, D. (2018). Amazon fired its resume-reading AI for sexism. Retrieved from www.popularmechanics.com/technology/robots/a23708450/amazon-resume-ai-sexism/Google Scholar
Gruenfeld, D. H., Martorana, P. V., & Fan, E. T. (2000). What do groups learn from their worldliest members? Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 45–59.Google Scholar
Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308(5722), 697–702.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (1998). Why teams don’t work. In Tindale, R. S., Heath, L., & Edwards, J. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 245–267). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human–robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527.Google Scholar
Hausknecht, J. P., & Holwerda, J. A. (2013). When does employee turnover matter? Dynamic member configurations, productive capacity, and collective performance. Organization Science, 24(1), 210–225.Google Scholar
Hayes, E. (2008, May 12). Google’s 20 percent factor. ABC News. Retrieved from https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=4839327&page=1Google Scholar
Hinds, P. J., Carley, K. M., Krackhardt, D., & Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(2), 226–251.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E. III (2012). Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 232–255.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., & Knight, A. P. (2015). Who defers to whom and why? Dual pathways linking demographic differences and dyadic deference to team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 59–84.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., Ziegert, J. C., Knight, A. P., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(4), 590–621.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). London, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.Google Scholar
Kuhn, K. M. (2016). The rise of the “Gig Economy” and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 157–162.Google Scholar
Lanaj, K., Foulk, T. A., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2018). The benefits of not seeing eye to eye with leadership: Divergence in risk preferences impacts multiteam system behavior and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1554–1582.Google Scholar
Lanaj, K., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2015). Leadership over-emergence in self-managing teams: The role of gender and countervailing biases. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1476–1494.Google Scholar
Lanaj, K., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Barnes, C. M., & Harmon, S. J. (2013). The double-edged sword of decentralized planning in multiteam systems. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 735–757.Google Scholar
Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385–399.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 585–634.Google Scholar
Lewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159–178.Google Scholar
Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., ... & Murray, P. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189.Google Scholar
Luciano, M. M., DeChurch, L. A., & Mathieu, J. E. (2018). Multiteam systems: A structural framework and meso-theory of system functioning. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1065–1096.Google Scholar
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.Google Scholar
Marr, B. (2018, August 29). The future of work: Are you ready for smart cobots? Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/08/29/the-future-of-work-are-you-ready-for-smart-cobots/#174e49e522b3Google Scholar
Maruping, L. M., & Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task–technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 975–990.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Marks, M. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). Multi-team systems. In Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), Organizational psychology, Vol. 2: Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 289–313). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130–160.Google Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., Carter, D. R., Asencio, R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2016). Space exploration illuminates the next frontier for teams research. Group & Organization Management, 41(5), 595–628.Google Scholar
Mortensen, M., Woolley, A. W., & O’Leary, M. B. (2007). Conditions enabling effective multiple team membership. In Crowston, K., Sieber, S., & Wynn, E. (Eds.), Virtuality and virtualization (pp. 215–228). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business.Google Scholar
Murase, T., Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2014). Mind the gap: The role of leadership in multiteam system collective cognition. Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 972–986.Google Scholar
O’Leary, M. B., Mortensen, M., & Woolley, A. W. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 461–478.Google Scholar
Osborn, K. (2016, June 6). Real-time drone footage just gave the Apache a deadly advantage. Business Insider. Retrieved from www.businessinsider.com/real-time-drone-footage-for-apache-2016-6Google Scholar
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pluut, H., Flestea, A. M., & Curşeu, P. L. (2014). Multiple team membership: A demand or resource for employees? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(4), 333–348.Google Scholar
Robinette, P., Li, W., Allen, R., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2016). Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios. 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, March 7–10, 2016, Christchurch, New Zealand. Association for Computing Machinery/Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Retrieved from http://humanrobotinteraction.org/2016/Google Scholar
Sauermann, H., & Franzoni, C. (2015). Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(3), 679–684.Google Scholar
Shuffler, M. L., & Carter, D. R. (2018). Teamwork situated in multiteam systems: Key lessons learned and future opportunities. American Psychologist, 73(4), 390–406.Google Scholar
Simpson, R., Page, K. R., & De Roure, D. (2014). Zooniverse: Observing the world’s largest citizen science platform. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’14 Companion) (pp. 1049–1054). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Spitzmuller, M., & Park, G. (2018). Terrorist teams as loosely coupled systems. American Psychologist, 73(4), 491–503.Google Scholar
Steinke, J., Bolunmez, B., Fletcher, L., Wang, V., Tomassetti, A. J., Repchick, K. M., ... & Tetrick, L. E. (2015). Improving cybersecurity incident response team effectiveness using teams-based research. IEEE Security & Privacy, 13(4), 20–29.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. D., Lungeanu, A., DeChurch, L. A., & Contractor, N. S. (2015). Space, time, and the development of shared leadership networks in multiteam systems. Network Science, 3(1),124–155.Google Scholar
Torres-Cortez, R. (2017, October 7). Firefighters’ training kicked in, helping curb shooting death toll. Las Vegas Sun. Retrieved from https://lasvegassun.com/news/2017/oct/07/firefighters-training-kicked-in-helping-curb-shoot/Google Scholar
Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., & Jones, B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342(6157), 468–472.Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Hicks, D. (2015). Scientific teams: Self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 197–207.Google Scholar
Wax, A. (2015). Self-assembled teams: Attraction, composition, and performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. P., Mooney, S., Allen, D., Beller-Simms, N., Fish, T., Grambsch, A. E., ... & Langner, L. (2014). From global change science to action with social sciences. Nature Climate Change, 4(8), 656–659.Google Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & DeChurch, L. A. (2012). Multiteam systems: An introduction In Multiteam systems (pp. 18–47). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 451–483.Google Scholar

References

Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Dixon, R. A. (1984). New perspectives on the development of intelligence in adulthood: Toward a dual-process conception and a model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes, P. B. & Brim, O. G. Jr. (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior, Vol. 6 (pp. 33–76). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Lifespan theory in developmental psychology. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 569–664). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Lipsitt, L. P. (1980). Life-span developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65–110.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471–507.Google Scholar
Beehr, T. A., & Bennett, M. M. (2015). Working after retirement: Features of bridge employment and research directions. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 112–128.Google Scholar
Beier, M. E., Teachout, M. S., & Cox, C. B. (2012). The training and development of an aging workforce. In Hedge, J. W. & Borman, W. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 436–453). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beier, M. E., Torres, W. J., & Gilberto, J. M. (2017). Continuous development throughout a career: A lifespan perspective on autonomous learning. In Ellingson, J. E. & Noe, R. A. (Eds.), Autonomous learning in the workplace (pp. 179–200). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bianchi, E. C. (2013). The bright side of bad times: The affective advantages of entering the workforce in a recession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 587–623.Google Scholar
Bianchi, E. C. (2014). Entering adulthood in a recession tempers later narcissism. Psychological Science, 25, 1429–1437.Google Scholar
Böhm, S. A., Schröder, H. S., & Kunze, F. (2013). Comparative age management: Theoretical perspectives and practical implications. In Field, J., Burke, R., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of work, aging, and society (pp. 211–237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brandtstädter, J. (1999). The self in action and development: Cultural, biosocial, and ontogenetic bases of intentional self-development. In Brandtstädter, J. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Action and self development: Theory and research through the life span (pp. 37–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Calo, J. (2005). The generativity track: A transitional approach to retirement. Public Personnel Management, 34, 301–312.Google Scholar
Campbell, S. M., Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). Fuzzy but useful constructs: Making sense of the differences between generations. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3, 130–139.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. (1991). Selectivity theory: Social activity in life-span context. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 11, 195–217.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, S. T. (2010). Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1068–1091.Google Scholar
Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 375–394.Google Scholar
Costanza, D. P., Badger-Darrow, J. B., Yost, A. B., & Severt, J. B. (2017). A review of analytical methods used to study generational differences: Strengths and limitations. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3, 149–165.Google Scholar
Damman, M., Henkens, K., & Kalmijn, M. (2013). Missing work after retirement: The role of life histories in the retirement adjustment process. The Gerontologist, 55, 802–813.Google Scholar
Day, D. V. (2011). Integrative perspectives on longitudinal investigations of leader development: From childhood through adulthood. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 561–571.Google Scholar
Day, D. V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R. E., & McKee, R. A. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 63–82.Google Scholar
Day, D. V., Harrison, M. M., & Halpin, S. M. (2012). An integrative approach to leader development: Connecting adult development, identity, and expertise. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeLong, D. W. (2004). Lost knowledge: Confronting the threat of an aging workforce. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. A., & Baltes, P. B. (1986). Toward life-span research on the functions and pragmatics of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 203–235). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doerwald, F., Scheibe, S., Zacher, H., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2016). Emotional competencies across adulthood: State of knowledge and implications for the work context. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2, 159–216.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., Earl, J. K., & Muratore, A. M. (2010). Extending the integrated model of retirement adjustment: Incorporating mastery and retirement planning. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 279–289.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H. (1999). Children of the Great Depression: Social change in life experience. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Featherman, D. L., & Lerner, R. M. (1985). Ontogenesis and sociogenesis: Problematics for theory and research about development and socialization across the lifespan. American Sociological Review, 50, 659–676.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. C. (2002). Stability in the midst of change: A developmental perspective on the study of careers. In Feldman, D. C. (Ed.), Work careers: A developmental perspective (pp. 3–26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Fisher, G. G., Stachowski, A., Infurna, F. J., Faul, J. D., Grosch, J., and Tetrick, L. E. (2014). Mental work demands, retirement, and longitudinal trajectories of cognitive functioning. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 231–242.Google Scholar
Ford, D. H., & Lerner, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gerland, P., Raftery, A. E., Ševčíková, H., Li, N., Gu, D., Spoorenberg, T., ... & Wilmoth, J. (2014). World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science, 346, 234–237.Google Scholar
Hall, D. T., & Mirvis, P. H. (1995). The new career contract: Developing the whole person at midlife and beyond. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47(3), 269–289.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 284–304.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, J., & Tomasik, M. J. (2002). Get an apprenticeship before school is out: How German adolescents adjust vocational aspirations when getting close to a developmental deadline. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 199–219.Google Scholar
Hirschi, A., Niles, S. G., & Akos, P. (2011). Engagement in adolescent career preparation: Social support, personality and the development of choice decidedness and congruence. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 173–182.Google Scholar
Infurna, F. J., & Andel, R. (2017). The impact of changes in episodic memory surrounding retirement on subsequent risk of disability, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Work, Aging and Retirement.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 29, 440–458.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1987). The Measurement of moral judgement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kooij, D. T. (2015). Successful aging at work: The active role of employees. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 309–319.Google Scholar
Kooij, D. T. A. M., de Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W., Kanfer, R., & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2011). Age and work-related motives: Results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 197–225.Google Scholar
Kooij, D. T., Tims, M., & Kanfer, R. (2015). Successful aging at work: The role of job crafting. In Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.), Aging workers and the employee–employer relationship (pp. 145–161). Zurich, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Kooij, D. T., van Woerkom, M., Wilkenloh, J., Dorenbosch, L., & Denissen, J. J. (2017). Job crafting towards strengths and interests: The effects of a job crafting intervention on person–job fit and the role of age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 971–981.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kunze, F., Boehm, S. A., & Bruch, H. (2011). Age diversity, age discrimination climate and performance consequences: A cross organizational study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 264–290.Google Scholar
Lerner, R. M. (1996). Relative plasticity, integration, temporality, and diversity in human development: A developmental contextual perspective about theory, process, and method. Developmental Psychology, 32, 781–786.Google Scholar
Lerner, R. M., & Busch-Rossnagel, N. A. (1981). Individuals as producers of their development: A life-span perspective. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, R. M., & Kauffman, M. B. (1985). The concept of development in contextualism. Developmental Review, 5, 309–333.Google Scholar
Levinson, D. J. (1986). A conception of adult development. American Psychologist, 41, 3–13.Google Scholar
Marcus, J., & Fritzsche, B. A. (2016). The cultural anchors of age discrimination in the workplace: A multilevel framework. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2, 217–229.Google Scholar
Maurer, T. J. (2001). Career-relevant learning and development, worker age, and beliefs about self-efficacy for development. Journal of Management, 27, 123–140.Google Scholar
Naegele, G., & Walker, A. (2010). Age management in organisations in the European Union. In Malloch, M. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of workplace learning (pp. 251–267). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Oltmanns, J., Godde, B., Winneke, A. H., Richter, G., Niemann, C., Voelcker-Rehage, C., ... & Staudinger, U. M. (2017). Don’t lose your brain at work: The role of recurrent novelty at work in cognitive and brain aging. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, e2598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00117.Google Scholar
Parker, S. K., & Bindl, U. K. (Eds.). (2016). Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Phillips, S. D. (2015). Lifespan career development. In Hartung, P. J., Savickas, M. L., & Walsh, W. B. (Eds.), APA handbook of career intervention, Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 99–113). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget’s theory. In Piaget and his school (pp. 11–23). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin.Google Scholar
Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35, 158–188.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. (2018). A revised sociogenomic model of personality traits. Journal of Personality.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., O’Donnell, M., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Goal and personality trait development in emerging adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 541–550.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Person–environment fit and its implications for personality development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 72, 89–110.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (2006). Personality development in the context of the neo-socioanalytic model of personality. In Mroczek, D. K. & Little, T. D. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 11–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1996). Changing the deal while keeping the people. Academy of Management Executive, 10, 50–59.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W. (2015). A note on the folly of cross-sectional operationalizations of generations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 362–366.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W. (2016). Lifespan developmental perspectives on working: A literature review of motivational theories. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2, 130–158.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., & Baltes, B. B. (2017). Age and health jointly moderate the influence of flexible work arrangements on work engagement: Evidence from two empirical studies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 40–58.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112–138.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2016). Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 17–34.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Marcus, J., & Zacher, H. (2019). Global Issues in Work, Aging, and Retirement. In Shultz, K. & Adams, G. (Eds.), Aging & work in the 21st century (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Toomey, E., & Baltes, B. B. (2017). Considering age diversity in recruitment and selection: An expanded work lifespan view of age management. In McCarthy, J. & Parry, E. (Eds.), Handbook of age diversity and work (pp. 607–638). London, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W. & Zacher, H. (2015). Intergenerational perceptions and conflicts in multi-age and multigenerational work environments. In Finkelstein, L., Truxillo, D., Fraccaroli, F., F., & Kanfer, R. (Eds.), Facing the challenges of a multi-age workforce: A use-inspired approach (pp. 253–282). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W. & Zacher, H. (2017a). Considering generations from a lifespan developmental perspective. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3, 113–129.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W. & Zacher, H. (2017b). Myths and misconceptions about leading generations: Setting the record straight. In Scandura, T. A. & Mouriño, E. (Eds.), Leading diversity in the 21st century (pp. 243–278). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W. & Zacher, H. (2018). The kids are alright: Taking stock of generational differences. The Industrial and Organizational Psychologist, 55. http://my.siop.org/tip/jan18/editor/ArtMID/13745/ArticleID/248/The-Kids-Are-Alright-Taking-Stock-of-Generational-Differences-at-WorkGoogle Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (2012). Consequences of age-related cognitive declines. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 201–226.Google Scholar
Scheibe, S., & Zacher, H. (2013). A lifespan perspective on emotion regulation, stress, and well-being in the workplace. In Perrewé, P. L., Rosen, C. C., & Halbesleben, J. R. B. (Eds.), The role of emotion and emotion regulation in job stress and well-being (pp. 163–193). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Schooler, C., Mulatu, M. S., & Oates, G. (1999). The continuing effects of substantively complex work on the intellectual functioning of older workers. Psychology and Aging, 14, 483–506.Google Scholar
Shanahan, M. J. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 667–692.Google Scholar
Slagter, F. (2007). Knowledge management among the older workforce. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 82–96.Google Scholar
Toomey, E. C., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018). Age-conditional effects in the affective arousal, empathy, and emotional labor linkage: Within-person evidence from an experience sampling study. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4, 145–160.Google Scholar
Truxillo, D. M., Cadiz, D. M., Rineer, J. R., Zaniboni, S., & Fraccaroli, F. (2012). A lifespan perspective on job design: Fitting the job and the worker to promote job satisfaction, engagement, and performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 2, 340–360.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 862–877.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Egos inflating over time: A cross‐temporal meta‐analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 875–902.Google Scholar
Upadyaya, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). Development of early vocational behavior: Parallel associations between career engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.008Google Scholar
Urry, H. L., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotion regulation in older age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 352–357.Google Scholar
Vondracek, F. W., Lerner, R. M., & Schulenberg, J. E. (1986). Career development: A life-span developmental approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (2005). The emergence of age management in Europe. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 10, 685–697.Google Scholar
Wang, M., Burlacu, G., Truxillo, D., James, K., & Yao, X. (2015). Age differences in feedback reactions: The roles of employee feedback orientation on social awareness and utility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1296–1308.Google Scholar
Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2014). Psychological research on retirement. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 209–233.Google Scholar
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta- analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206316654545Google Scholar
Zacher, H. (2015a). Using lifespan developmental theory and methods as a viable alternative to the study of generational differences at work. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 342–346.Google Scholar
Zacher, H. (2015b). Successful aging at work. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 4–25.Google Scholar
Zacher, H., Dirkers, B. T., Korek, S., & Hughes, B. (2017). Age-differential effects of job characteristics on job attraction: A policy-capturing study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1124. doi: 10.3389/psyg.2017.01124Google Scholar
Zacher, H., Hacker, W., & Frese, M. (2016). Action regulation across the adult lifespan (ARAL): A meta-theory of work and aging. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2, 286–306.Google Scholar
Zacher, H., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & Beier, M. E. (2018). Active aging at work: Contributing factors and implications for organizations. Organizational Dynamics.Google Scholar
Zaniboni, S., Truxillo, D. M., & Fraccaroli, F. (2013). Differential effects of task variety and skill variety on burnout and turnover intentions for older and younger workers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 306–317.Google Scholar
Zwaan, K., ter Bogt, T. F., & Raaijmakers, Q. (2010). Career trajectories of Dutch pop musicians: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.03.004Google Scholar

References

Allen, T. D., Freeman, D. M., Russell, J. E., Reizenstein, R. C., & Rentz, J. O. (2001). Survivor reactions to organizational downsizing: Does time ease the pain? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 145–164.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66, 345–376.Google Scholar
American Management Association. (1996). 1996 AMA survey on downsizing, job elimination and job creation. New York, NY: American Management Association. Retrieved from www.copyrightreviews.com/5046137/1996-ama-survey-on-downsizing-job-elimination-and-job-creationGoogle Scholar
Andreu, R., & Sieber, S. (2001). Rally racing: knowledge and learning requirements for a winning team. Knowledge and Process Management, 8, 91–98.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, E., & Batt, R. (1994). The new American workforce transforming work systems in the United States. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. B., Defillippi, R. J., & Lindsay, V. J. (2008). On being a knowledge worker. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 365–377.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.Google Scholar
Bal, P. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G., & Van Der Velde, M. E. (2008). Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta-analysis of age as a moderator. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 143–158.Google Scholar
Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4) 496–513.Google Scholar
Barney, C. E., & Elias, S. M. (2010). Flex-time as a moderator of the job stress–work motivation relationship: A three nation investigation. Personnel Review, 39, 487–502.Google Scholar
Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2011). Generations at work: Are there differences and do they matter? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 1843–1865.Google Scholar
Blackford, K., Jancey, J., Howat, P., Ledger, M., & Lee, A. H. (2012). Office-based physical activity and nutrition intervention: Barriers, enablers, and preferred strategies for workplace obesity prevention, Perth, Western Australia, 2012. Preventing Chronic Disease, 10.Google Scholar
Blauner, R. (1964). Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borjas, G. (2008). Labor outflows and labor inflows in Puerto Rico. Journal of Human Capital, 2, 32–68.Google Scholar
Brantely, P. J. (1993). Daily stress and stress related disorders. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 17–25.Google Scholar
Brief, A. P. (2008). Diversity at work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brockner, J. (1988). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research, theory, and practice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 213–256.Google Scholar
Bryant, S. (2000). At home on the electronic frontier: Work, gender and the information highway. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15, 19–33.Google Scholar
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.Google Scholar
Caplow, T., Hicks, L., & Wattenberg, B. J. (2001). The first measured century: An illustrated guide to trends in America, 1900–2000. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Capozza, D., & Brown, R. (Eds.). (2000). Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P. (1999). The new deal at work: Managing the market-driven workforce. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P. H. (2015). Skill gaps, skill shortages, and skill mismatches: Evidence and arguments for the United States. ILR Review, 68(2), 251–290.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P., Bassi, L., Katz, H., Knoke, D., Osterman, P., & Useem, M. (1997). Change at work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person–organization values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 891–906.Google Scholar
Cohen, C. (1980). After effects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 82–108.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., & Spacapan, S. (1978). The after effects of stress: An attentional interpretation. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 3, 43–57.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.Google Scholar
Coovert, M. D. (1995). Technological changes in office jobs (pp. 175–208). In Howard, A. (Ed.), The changing nature of work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Coovert, M. D., & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.). (2013). The psychology of workplace technology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L. Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 375–394.Google Scholar
Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834–848.Google Scholar
Deal, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2010). Millennials at work: What we know and what we need to do (if anything). Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 191–199.Google Scholar
Dekas, K. H., Bauer, T. N., Welle, B., Kurkoski, J., & Sullivan, S. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior, version 2.0: A review and qualitative investigation of OCBs for knowledge workers at Google and beyond. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 219–237.Google Scholar
Dimock, M., Doherty, C., & Tyson, A. (2013). Favorable views of business, labor rebound. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/6-27-13%20Business%20and%20Labor%20Release.pdfGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.Google Scholar
Families and Work Institute & American Business Collaboration. (2004) Gender & generation within the workplace. The American Business Collaboration. Retrieved from www.abcdependentcare.com/docs/ABC-generation-gender-workplace.pdf.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. C., Leana, C. R., & Bolino, M. C. (2002). Underemployment and relative deprivation among re‐employed executives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 453–471.Google Scholar
Felin, T., Zenger, T. R., & Tomsik, J. (2009). The knowledge economy: Emerging organizational forms, missing microfoundations, and key considerations for managing human capital. Human Resource Management, 48, 555–570.Google Scholar
Felstead, A., Jewson, N., Phizacklea, A., & Walters, S. (2002). The option to work at home: Another privilege for the favoured few? New Technology, Work and Employment, 17, 204–223.Google Scholar
Fields, D. (2002). Taking the measure of work: A guide to scales for organizational research and diagnosis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fried, Y., Levi, A. S., & Laurence, G. (2008). Job design in the new world of work. In Cartwright, S. & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of personnel psychology (pp. 587–597). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, N. K., & Breaugh, J. A. (2004). Family-friendly policies, supervisor support, work–family conflict, family–work conflict, and satisfaction: A test of a conceptual model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 197–220.Google Scholar
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541.Google Scholar
Gakovic, A., & Tetrick, L. E. (2003). Psychological contract breach as a source of strain for employees. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 235–246.Google Scholar
Galinsky, E., Bond, J., Kim, S., Brownfield, E., & Sakai, K. (2005). When the way we work becomes too much. Retrieved from www.familiesandwork.orgGoogle Scholar
Gallie, D. (1978). In search of the new working class: Automation and social integration within the capitalist enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentile, B., Wood, L. A., Twenge, J. M., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, W. K. (2014). The problem of generational change: Why cross-sectional designs are inadequate for investigating generational differences. In Lance, C. E. & Vandenberg, R. J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends (2nd ed.) (pp.100–111). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Grandey, A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 95–110Google Scholar
Grover, S. L., & Crooker, K. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human-resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48, 271–288.Google Scholar
Hammer, L. B., Allen, E., & Grigsby, T. D. (1997). Work–family conflict in dual-earner couples: Within-individual and crossover effects of work and family. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 185–203.Google Scholar
Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50, 49–58.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hon, A. H., & Chan, W. W. (2013). The effects of group conflict and work stress on employee performance. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54, 174–184.Google Scholar
Howard, A. (Ed.) (1995). The changing nature of work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic of the summary and theoretical extension work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408.Google Scholar
Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job design, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.Google Scholar
Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Keiningham, T. L., & Aksoy, L. (2009). Why loyalty matters: The groundbreaking approach to rediscovering happiness, meaning, and lasting fulfillment in your life and work. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.Google Scholar
Kennedy, T. L., Smith, A., Wells, A. T., & Wellman, B. (2008). Networked families. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 1–44. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Networked-Families.aspxGoogle Scholar
Kessels, J. W. (2001). Learning in organisations: A corporate curriculum for the knowledge economy. Futures, 33, 497–506.Google Scholar
Kidder, D. L., Lankau, M. J., Chrobot-Mason, D., Mollica, K. A., & Friedman, R. A. (2004). Backlash toward diversity initiatives: Examining the impact of diversity program justification, personal and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 77–102.Google Scholar
Kiggundu, M. N. (1983). Task interdependence and job design – test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 145–172.Google Scholar
Knudsen, H. K., Johnson, A. J., Martin, J. K., & Roman, P. M. (2003). Downsizing survival: The experience of work and organizational commitment. Sociological Inquiry, 73, 265–283.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. (2002). Managing change: The power of leadership. Balanced Scorecard Report, 4, 6–9.Google Scholar
Kowske, B. J., Rasch, R., & Wiley, J. (2010). Millennials’(lack of) attitude problem: An empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 265–279.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., Smith, E. M., & Hedlund, J. (1993). Organizational downsizing: Strategies, interventions, and research implications. In Cooper, C. L. & Robertson, I. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 262–332). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Lewis, S., & Roper, I. (2008). Flexible working arrangement: From work–life to gender equity policies. In Susan, C. L. and Cooper, G., The Oxford handbook of personnel psychology (pp. 411–437). Oxford: Cartwright.Google Scholar
Lloyd, C., King, R., & Chenoweth, L. (2002). Social work, stress and burnout: A review. Journal of Mental Health, 11, 255–265.Google Scholar
Lub, X., Nije Bijvank, M., Matthijs Bal, P., Blomme, R., & Schalk, R. (2012). Different or alike? Exploring the psychological contract and commitment of different generations of hospitality workers. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24, 553–573.Google Scholar
Madden, M., & Jones, S. (2008). Networked workers. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Networked-Workers.aspxGoogle Scholar
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 498–512.Google Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2006). How family-friendly work environments affect work/family conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Labor Research, 27, 555–574.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta‐analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 689–725.Google Scholar
Milkie, M. A., & Peltola, P. (1999). Playing all the roles: Gender and the work–family balancing act. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 476–490.Google Scholar
Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Allegretto, S. (2007). The state of working America 2006/2007. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21, 986–1010.Google Scholar
Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1997). Managing emotions in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 257–274.Google Scholar
Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226–256.Google Scholar
Mottaz, C. J. (1988). Determinants of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 41, 467–482.Google Scholar
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (1999). The changing nature of work: Implications for occupational analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). Long work hours: A social identity perspective on meta‐analysis data. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 853–880.Google Scholar
Nixon, A. E., & Spector, P. E. (2013). The impact of technology on employee stress, health, and well-being. In Coovert, M. D. & Thompson, L. Foster (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology (pp. 238–260). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noer, D. M. (1990). Layoff survivor sickness: A new challenge for supervisors. Supervisory Management, 35, 1–2.Google Scholar
Noer, D. M. (1993). Healing the wounds. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Noer, D. M. (1997). Breaking free: A prescription for personal and organizational change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Noonan, M. C., & Glass, J. L. (2012). The hard truth about telecommuting. Monthly Labor Review, 135, 38–45.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 299–357). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Potosky, D., & Lomax, M. W. (2013). Leadership and technology: A love–hate relationship. In Coovert, M. D. & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology, (pp. 118–146). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rhoades, L., & –714berger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.Google Scholar
Riordan, C. M., & Shore, L. M. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 342–358.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. E., Flowers, C., & Carroll, J. (2001). Work stress and marriage: A theoretical model examining the relationship between workaholism and marital cohesion. International Journal of Stress Management, 8, 165–175.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574–599.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1995). Changing individual–organization attachments: A two-way street. In Howard, A. (Ed.), The changing nature of work, (pp. 290–321). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315.Google Scholar
Shirom, A., Westman, M., Shamai, O., & Carel, R. S. (1997). Effects of work overload and burnout on cholesterol and triglycerides levels: The moderating effects of emotional reactivity among male and female employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2(4), 275–288.Google Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management. (2008a). SHRM 2007 Symposium on the Workforce Readiness of the Future US Labor Pool: Executive summary. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management. (2008b). Workforce readiness weekly survey. Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/surveys.Google Scholar
Spence, J. T., & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 160–178.Google Scholar
Staufenbiel, T., & König, C. J. (2010). A model for the effects of job insecurity on performance, turnover intention, and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 101–117.Google Scholar
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20, 503–530.Google Scholar
Stockdale, M. S., & Crosby, F. J. (2004). The psychology and management of workplace diversity. Malden, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., & Näswall, K. (2002). No security: A meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(3), 242–264.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity of theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Taylor, P., Funk, C., & Craighill, P. (2006). Public says American work life is worsening, but most workers remain satisfied with their jobs. Pew Social Trends. Retrieved from http://pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/10/Jobs.pdfGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K. M., & Chrobot-Mason, D. (2005). Group-level explanations of workplace discrimination. In Dipboye, R. L., & Colella, A. (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 63–88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36, 1117–1142.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. (1975–2011). Statistical abstracts of the United States: 1975–2011. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.census.gov/compendia/statab/Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. (2012). Statistical abstracts of the United States: 2012. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.census.gov/compendia/statab/Google Scholar
US Department of Labor, Bureau of Statistics (2004). Number of jobs held, labor market activity, and earnings growth among younger baby boomers: Recent results from a longitudinal survey. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/nls/nlsy79r20.pdfGoogle Scholar
US Department of Labor, Bureau of Statistics (2006). Occupational changes: Then and now. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2006/apr/wk1/art04.htmGoogle Scholar
Valcour, P. M., & Hunter, L. W. (2005). Technology, organizations, and work–life integration. In Kossik, EE & Lambert, SJ (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 61–84). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van der Spiegel, J. (1995). New information technologies and changes in work. In Howard, A. (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 97–111). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Varca, P. E. (2006). Telephone surveillance in call centers: Prescriptions for reducing strain. Managing Service Quality, 16, 290–305.Google Scholar
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management, 44, 352–386.Google Scholar
Wesolowski, M. A., & Mossholder, K. W. (1997). Relational demography in supervisor–subordinate dyads: Impact on subordinate job satisfaction, burnout, and perceived procedural justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 351–362.Google Scholar
Wharton, A. S. (1993). The affective consequences of service work: Managing emotions on the job. Work and Occupations, 20, 205–232.Google Scholar
Wilson, B., Squires, M., Widger, K., Cranley, L., & Tourangeau, A. (2008). Job satisfaction among a multigenerational nursing workforce. Journal of Nursing Management, 16, 716–723.Google Scholar
Wong, S. S., DeSanctis, G., & Staudenmayer, N. (2007). The relationship between task interdependency and role stress: A revisit of the job demands–control model. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 284–303.Google Scholar
Zhao, H. A. O., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647–680.Google Scholar

References

Allen, T., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 40–68.Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2013). The evidence for generation we and against generation me. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 5–10.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 3–30.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Prins, J. T., & van der Heijden, F. M. M. A. (2011). Applying the job demands–resources model to the work–home interface: A study among medical residents and their partners. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 170–180.Google Scholar
Baruch, Y., Dickmann, M., Altman, Y., & Bournois, F. (2013). Exploring international work: Types and dimensions of global careers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2369–2393.Google Scholar
Baugh, S. G., Sullivan, S. E., & Carraher, S. M. (2013). Global careers in the United States. In Reis, C. & Baruch, Y. (Eds.). Careers without borders (pp. 297–322). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. (2013). Judgments in managerial decision making (8th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Becton, J. B., Walker, H. J., & Jones-Farmer, A. (2014). Generational differences in workplace behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 175–189.Google Scholar
Boveda, I., & Metz, A. J. (2016). Predicting end-of-career transitions for baby boomers nearing retirement age. Career Development Quarterly, 64, 153–168.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D T., & DeMuth, R. L. (2006). Protean and boundaryless careers: An empirical exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 30–47.Google Scholar
Brochu, P. & Morin, L. (2012). Union membership and perceived job insecurity: Thirty years of evidence from the American General Social Survey. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 65, 263–285.Google Scholar
Bughin, J., Chui, M., & Manyika, J. (2010). Clouds, big data, and smart assets: Ten tech-enabled business trends to watch. McKinsey Quarterly, August, 1–14.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, (2016, July 8). 24 percent of employed people did some or all of their work at home in 2015. The Economics Daily. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/24-percent-of-employed-people-did-some-or-all-of-their-work-at-home-in-2015.htmGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, (2017, June 27). American time use survey – 2016 results. BLS News Release. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus.pdf.Google Scholar
Butts, M. M., Becker, W. J., & Boswell, W. R. (2015). Hot buttons and time sinks: The effects of electronic communication during nonwork time on emotions and work–nonwork conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 763–788.Google Scholar
Callanan, G. A. (2015). They reap, but do not sow: How multi-national corporations are putting an end to virtuous capitalism. Business and Society Review, 120, 363–384.Google Scholar
Callanan, G. A., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2008). The baby boom generation and career management: A call to action. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 70–85.Google Scholar
Callanan, G. A., Perri, D. F., & Tomkowicz, S. (2017). Career management in uncertain times: Challenges and opportunities. Career Development Quarterly, 65, 353–365.Google Scholar
Capitano, J. (2016). When work enters the home: Antecedents of role boundary permeability behavior. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.)Google Scholar
Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. (2013a). Classifying work in the new economy. Academy of Management Review, 38, 575–596.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. (2013b). A study of the extent and potential causes of alternative employment arrangements. ILR Review, 66, 874–901.Google Scholar
Carmeli, A., & Russo, M. (2016). The power of micro-moves in cultivating regardful relationships: Implications for work–home enrichment and thriving. Human Resource Management Review, 26, 112–124.Google Scholar
Casper, W. J., Vaziri, H., Wayne, J. H., DeHauw, S., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2018). The jingle-jangle of work–nonwork balance: A comprehensive and meta-analytic review of its meaning and measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103: 182–214.Google Scholar
Cogin, J. (2012). Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-country evidence and implications. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 2268–2294.Google Scholar
Colbert, A., Yee, N., & George, G. (2016). The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 731–739.Google Scholar
Colby, S. L., & Ortman, J. M. (2014). The baby boom cohort in the United States: 2012 to 2060. US Census Bureau Current Population Reports, May. Retrieved from www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1141.pdfGoogle Scholar
Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Shore, L. (2007). The employee–organization relationship: Where do we go from here? Human Resource Management, 17, 166–179.Google Scholar
DeSilver, D. (2016). More older Americans are working, and working more, than they used to. Pew Research Center, Retrieved from www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/20/more-older-americans-are-working-and-working-more-than-they-used-toGoogle Scholar
Diaz, I., Chiaburu, D., Zimmerman, R. D., & Boswell, W. R. (2012). Communication technology: Pros and cons of constant connection to work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 500–508.Google Scholar
DiRenzo, M. S., Greenhaus, J. H., & Weer, C. H. (2015). Relationship between protean career orientation and work–life balance: A resource perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 538–560.Google Scholar
Ewing, J. (2017). Robocalypse now? Central bankers argue whether automation will kill jobs. New York Times, June 28. Retrieved from www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
Fleming, P. (2017). The human capital hoax: Work, debt and insecurity in the era of uberization. Organization Studies, 38, 691–709.Google Scholar
Frey, T. (2015). 101 endangered jobs by 2030. Journal of Environmental Health, 77, 40–42.Google Scholar
Friedman, S. D. (2008). Be a better leader, have a richer life. Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 112–118.Google Scholar
Fullerton, A. S., & Wallace, M. (2005). Traversing the flexible turn: US workers’ perceptions of job security, 1977–2002. Social Science Research, 36, 201–221.Google Scholar
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., Callanan, G. A., & Godshalk, V. M. (2019). Career management for life (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Kossek, E. E. (2014) The contemporary career: A work–home perspective. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 361–388.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2017). Making work and family work: From hard choices to smart choices. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, S. (2015). In service sector, no rest for the working. New York Times, February 21. Retrieved from www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
Hannagan, A., & Morduch, J. (2015). Income gains and month-to-month income volatility: Household evidence from the US Financial Diaries. US Financial Diaries Project, October, 1–28. Retrieved from https://wagner.nyu.edu/files/faculty/publications/Google Scholar
Hansen, J. C. & Leuty, M. E. (2012). Work values across generations. Journal of Career Assessment, 20, 34–52.Google Scholar
Henly, J. R., & Lambert, S. (2014). Unpredictable work timing in retail jobs: Implications for employee work–life outcomes. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 67, 986–1016.Google Scholar
Holland, P., & Bardoel, A. (2016). The impact of technology on work in the twenty-first century: exploring the smart and dark side. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 2579–2581.Google Scholar
Horowitz, S. (2015). Help for the way we work now. New York Times, September 7. Retrieved from www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
Ilies, R., Schwind, K. M., Wagner, D. T., Johnson, M. D., DeRue, D. S., & Ilgen, D. R. (2007). When can employees have a family life? The effects of daily workload and affect on work–family conflict and social behaviors at home. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1368–1379.Google Scholar
Irby, C. M. (2014). All in a day’s work: overcoming telework challenges. Monthly Labor Review, December.Google Scholar
Irwin, N. (2016). With “gigs” instead of jobs, workers bear new burdens. New York Times, March 31. Retrieved from www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
Janssen, P. P. M., Peeters, M. C. W., de Jonge, J., Houkes, I., & Tummers, G. E. R. (2004). Specific relationships between job demands, job resources and psychological outcomes and the mediating role of negative work–home interference. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 411–429.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., & Franz, G. (2011). Generations in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 177–205.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G., & Martocchio, J. J. (2010). Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, 392–414.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kantor, J. (2014). As shifts vary, family’s only constant is chaos. New York Times, August 14. Retrieved from www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2017). The role of unemployment in the rise of alternative work arrangements. American Economic Review, 107, 388–392.Google Scholar
Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2019). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. ILR Review, 72(2), 382–416.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2005). Flexibility enactment theory: Implications of flexibility type, control, and boundary management for work–family effectiveness. In Kossek, E. E. & Lambert, S. J. (Eds.), LEA’s organization and management series. Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 243–261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J, & Lautsch, B. A. (2015). Balanced workplace flexibility: Avoiding the traps. California Management Review, 57, 5–25.Google Scholar
Lambert, S. J., Haley-Lock, A., & Henly, J. R. (2012). Schedule flexibility in hourly jobs: Unanticipated consequences and promising directions. Community, Work & Family, 15, 293–315.Google Scholar
Lapierre, L. M., Li, Y., Kwan, H. K., Greenhaus, J. H., DiRenzo, M. S., & Shao, P. (2018). A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work–family enrichment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 385–401.Google Scholar
Lazarova, M. B., Westman, M., & Shaffer, M. A. (2010). Elucidating the positive side of the work–family interface on international assignments: A model of expatriate work and family performance. Academy of Management Review, 35, 93–117.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18, 421–428.Google Scholar
Lim, S., Ilies, R., Koopman, J., Christoforou, P., & Arvey, R. D. (2018). Emotional mechanisms linking incivility at work to aggression and withdrawal at home: an experience-sampling study. Journal of Management, 44, 2888–2908.Google Scholar
Lyons, S. T., Higgins, C., & Duxbury, L. (2007). An empirical assessment of generational differences in basic human values. Psychological Reports, 101, 339–352.Google Scholar
Lyons, S. T., & Kuron, L. (2013). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 139–157.Google Scholar
Lyons, S. T., Schweitzer, L., & Ng, E. S. W. (2015). How have careers changed? An investigation of changing career patterns across four generations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30, 8–21.Google Scholar
Mäkelä, L., Kinnunen, U., & Suutari, V. (2015). Work-to-life conflict and enrichment among international business travelers: The role of international career orientation. Human Resource Management, 54, 517–531.Google Scholar
Manjoo, F. (2015). Uber’s business model could change your work. New York Times, January 28. Retrieved from www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. E., Sinclair, R. R., Lelchook, A. M., Wittmer, J. L., & Charles, K. E. (2012). Non-standard work schedules and retention in the entry-level workforce. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 1–22.Google Scholar
Matusik, S. F., & Mickel, A. E. (2011). Embracing or embattled by converged mobile devices? Users’ experiences with a contemporary connectivity technology. Human Relations, 64, 1001–1030.Google Scholar
Mayerhofer, H., Hartmann, L. C., Michelitsch-Riedl, G., & Kollinger, I. (2004). Flexpatriate assignments: A neglected issue in global staffing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 1371–1389.Google Scholar
Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 332–345.Google Scholar
Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 689–725.Google Scholar
Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 281–292.Google Scholar
Ng, T. W. H., Feldman, D. C., & Lam, S. S. K. (2010). Psychological contract breaches, organizational commitment, and innovation-related behaviors: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 744–751.Google Scholar
Noonan, M. C., & Glass, J. L. (2012). The hard truth about telecommuting. Monthly Labor Review, 135, 38–45.Google Scholar
Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 432–445.Google Scholar
Piszczek, M. M. (2017). Boundary control and controlled boundaries: Organizational expectations for technology use at the work–family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 592–611.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor–hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438–454.Google Scholar
Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2006). Is the opposite of positive negative? Untangling the complex relationship between work–family enrichment and conflict. Career Development International, 11, 650–659.Google Scholar
Ramarajan, L., & Reid, E. (2013). Shattering the myth of separate worlds: Negotiating nonwork identities at work. Academy of Management Review, 38, 621–641.Google Scholar
Ramaswami, A., Carter, N. M., & Dreher, G. F. (2016). Expatriation and career success: A human capital perspective. Human Relations, 69, 1959–1987.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2006). Self-directed expatriation: Family matters. Personnel Review, 35, 469–486.Google Scholar
Richter, A., Näswall, K., & Sverke, M. (2010). Job insecurity and its relation to work–family conflict: Mediation with a longitudinal data set. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31, 265–280.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Selmer, J. (2006). Expatriate experience. In Greenhaus, J. H. & Callanan, G. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of career development (pp. 306–307). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Shaffer, M. A., Kraimer, M. L., Chen, Y., & Bolino, M. C. (2012). Choices, challenges, and career consequences of global work experiences: A review and future agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 1282–1327.Google Scholar
Shoss, M. K. (2017). Job insecurity: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1911–1939.Google Scholar
Smithson, J., & Lewis, S. (2000). Is job insecurity changing the psychological contract? Personnel Review, 29, 680–702.Google Scholar
Sonnentag, S. (2012). Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: The benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 114–118.Google Scholar
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204–221.Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4: 473–499.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. E., Forret, M. L., Carraher, S. M., & Mainiero, L. A. (2009). Using the kaleidoscope career model to examine generational differences in work attitudes. Career Development International, 14, 284–302.Google Scholar
Sweeny, K. (2008). Crisis decision theory: Decisions in the face of negative events. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 61–76.Google Scholar
Tams, S., & Arthur, M. (2007). Studying careers across cultures: Distinguishing international, cross-cultural, and globalization perspectives. Career Development International, 12, 86–98.Google Scholar
Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(6), 545–556.Google Scholar
Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., & Keulemans, L. (2012). Do new ways of working foster work engagement? Psicothema, 24, 113–120.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36, 1117–1142.Google Scholar
Vacas-Soriano, C. (2015). Recent developments in temporary employment: Employment growth, wages and transitions. Dublin, Ireland: Eurofound.Google Scholar
Valletta, R., & van der List, C. (2015). Involuntary part-time work: Here to stay? FRBSF Economic Letter, June 8, 1–5.Google Scholar
Wayne, J. H., Grzywacz, J. H., Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2007). Work–family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 63–76.Google Scholar
Weber, L., & Silverman, R. E. (2015). On demand workers: “We are not robots.” Wall Street Journal, January 27. Retrieved from www.wsj.com.Google Scholar
Wegman, L. A., & Hoffman, B. J. (2017). The United States at work: A review and cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in the psychological experience of working. Paper presented in B. Hoffman & L. Wegman (Chairs), The Changing Nature of Work: Empirical Trends and Organizational Responses. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management, 44, 352–386.Google Scholar
Westman, M., Etzion, D., & Chen, S. (2008). Crossover of positive experiences from business travelers to their spouses. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 269–284.Google Scholar
Westman, M., Etzion, D., & Gattenio, E. (2008). International business travels and the work–family interface: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 459–480.Google Scholar
Winter, R. P., & Jackson, B. A. (2014). Expanding the younger worker employment relationship: Insights from values-based organizations. Human Resource Management, 53, 311–328.Google Scholar

References

Allen, T. D., & Martin, A. (2017). The work–family interface: A retrospective look at 20 years of research in JOHP. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000065Google Scholar
American Psychological Association (2017). Stress in America: The state of our nation. Stress in America™ Survey. Retrieved November 14, 2017, from www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2017/state-nation.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anger, W. K., Elliot, D. L., Bodner, T., Olson, R., Rohlman, D. S., Truxillo, D. M., ... & Montgomery, D. (2015). Effectiveness of Total Worker Health interventions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20, 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038340Google Scholar
Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, 831–858.Google Scholar
Babson, S. (Ed.) (1995) Lean work: Empowerment and exploitation in the global auto industry. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Baines, D. (2010). “If we don’t get back to where we were before”: Working in the restructured non-profit social services. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 928–945. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn176Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands–Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands-Resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 273–285.Google Scholar
Barber, L. K., & Santuzzi, A. M. (2015). Please respond ASAP: Workplace telepressure and employee recovery. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20, 172–189.Google Scholar
Barling, J., & Griffiths, A. (2011). A history of occupational health psychology. In Quick, J. C. & Tetrick, L. E. (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 21–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. C. (2006). Relationship of the number and distribution of work hours to health and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes. In Perrewe’, P. L. & Ganster, D. C. (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being, Vol. 5: Employee health, coping, and methodologies (pp. 99–138). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Benders, J., Bleijerveld, H., & Schouteten, R. (2017). Continuous improvement, burnout and job engagement: A study in a Dutch nursing department: Continuous improvement, burnout and job engagement. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 32, 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2355Google Scholar
Bergman, M. E., & Jean, V. A. (2016). Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial–organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9, 84–113.Google Scholar
Boswell, W. R., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Harris, T. B. (2014). I cannot afford to have a life: Employee adaptation to feelings of job insecurity. Personnel Psychology, 67, 887–915. doi:10.1111/peps.12061Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, (2013). Economic news release: Employee tenure summary. Retrieved November 14, 2017, from: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/print.pl/news.release/tenure.nr0.htm.Google Scholar
Campione, W. A. (2015). Corporate offerings: Why aren’t Millennials staying? Journal of Applied Business & Economics, 17, 60–75.Google Scholar
Carter, B., Danford, A., Howcroft, D., Richardson, H., Smith, A., & Taylor, P. (2011). ‘All they lack is a chain’: Lean and the new performance management in the British civil service. New Technology, Work and Employment, 26, 83–97.Google Scholar
Caruso, C. C. (2015). Reducing risks to women linked to shift work, long work hours, and related workplace sleep and fatigue issues. Journal of Women’s Health, 24, 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5481Google Scholar
Cheng, G. H.-L., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2008). Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta-analytic review. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 272–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00312.xGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. D. (2007). The new reality: Using benefits to attract and retain talent. Employment Relations Today (Wiley), 34, 47–53. doi:10.1002/ert.20164Google Scholar
Collins, J. J., Baase, C. M., Sharda, C. E., Ozminkowski, R, Nicholson, J., Billotti, S., G. M., ... & Berger, M. L. (2005). The assessment of chronic health conditions on work performance, absence, and total economic impact for employers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47, 547–557.Google Scholar
Dale-Olsen, H. (2006). Wages, fringe benefits and worker turnover.: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2004.03.005Google Scholar
Day, A., Kelloway, K. E., & Scott, N. (2010). Information and communication technology: Implications for job stress and employee well-being. In New developments in theoretical and conceptual approaches to job stress (pp. 317–350). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/S1479-3555(2010)0000008011Google Scholar
DeJoy, D. M., Wilson, M. G., Vandenberg, R. J., McGrath-Higgins, A. L., & Griffin-Blake, C. S. (2010). Assessing the impact of healthy work organization intervention. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 139–165.Google Scholar
Derks, D., van Mierlo, H., & Schmitz, E. B. (2014). A diary study on work-related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: Examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 74–84. doi:10.1037/a0035076Google Scholar
DeVol, R., & Bedroussian, A. (2007). An unhealthy America. The economic burden of chronic disease. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute.Google Scholar
De Witte, H. (1999). Job insecurity and psychological well-being: Review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 155–177. doi:10.1080/135943299398302Google Scholar
Dizaho, E. K., Salleh, R., & Abdullah, A. (2017). Achieving work life balance through flexible work schedules and arrangements. Global Business & Management Research, 9, 455–465.Google Scholar
Etzion, D., Eden, D., & Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 577–585. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.577Google Scholar
Fractl (2017). 2017 employee benefits study. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from www.frac.tl/employee-benefits-study/Google Scholar
Fu, P. L., Bradley, K. L., Viswanathan, S., Chan, J. M., & Stampfer, M. (2016). Trends in biometric health indices within an employer-sponsored wellness program with outcome-based incentives. American Journal of Health Promotion, 30, 453–457.Google Scholar
Ganster, D. C., Rosen, C. C., & Fisher, G. G. (2016). Long working hours and well-being: What we know, what we do not know, and what we need to know. Journal of Business and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869–016-9478-1Google Scholar
Goetzel, R. Z., Henke, R. M., Tabrizi, M., Pelletier, K. R., Loeppke, R., Ballard, D. W., ... & Metz, R. D. (2014). Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work? Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(9), 927–934. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000276Google Scholar
Grawitch, M. J., & Ballard, D. W. (2016). The psychologically healthy workplace: Building a win–win environment for organizations and employees. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hammer, L. B., Demsky, C. A., Kossek, E. E., & Bray, J. W. (2016). Work–family intervention research. In Allen, T. D. & Eby, L. (Eds). The Oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 349–361). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199337538.013.27Google Scholar
Hasle, P., Bojesen, A., Jensen, P. L., & Bramming, P. (2012). Lean and the working environment: A review of the literature. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32, 829–849.Google Scholar
Hasle, P., Nielsen, A. P., & Edwards, K. (2016). Application of lean manufacturing in hospitals–the need to consider maturity, complexity, and the value concept: Application of lean manufacturing in hospitals. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26, 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20668Google Scholar
Hatoum, H. T., Kong, S. X., Kania, C. M., Wong, J. M., & Mendelson, W. B. (1998). Insomnia, health-related quality of life and healthcare resource consumption. A study of managed-care organisation enrollees. Pharmacoeconomics, 14, 629–637.Google Scholar
Ho, S. (2017). The future of workplace wellness programs. Strategic HR Review, 16, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-11-2016-0101Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Leamon, T. B., Courtney, T. K., Chen, P. Y., & DeArmond, S. (2011). A comparison of workplace safety perceptions among financial decision-makers of medium- vs. large-size companies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 1–10Google Scholar
Hunt, M. K., Lederman, R., Stoddard, A. M., LaMontagne, A. D., McLellan, D., Combe, C., ... & Sorensen, G. (2005). Process evaluation of an integrated health promotion/occupational health model in WellWorks-2. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 32, 10–26.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (2014). Global employment trends 2014: Risk of a jobless recovery? International Labour Office. Geneva: ILO. Retrieved November 14, 2017, from: www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_233953.pdf.Google Scholar
Islam, S., & Wentworth, D. K. (2014). Work experience and gender effects on the work schedule preferences of undergraduate accounting students. Accounting and Finance Research, 3, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v3n3Google Scholar
Jamieson, S. D., & Tuckey, M. R. (2017). Mindfulness interventions in the workplace: A critique of the current state of the literature. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000048Google Scholar
Jensen, D., McMullen, T., & Stark, M. (2007). The manager’s guide to rewards: What you need to know to get the best for – and from – your employees. New York, NY: AMACOM/American Management Association.Google Scholar
Jones, J. M. (2015). In US, telecommuting for work climbs to 37%. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from http://news.gallup.com.libproxy.clemson.edu/poll/184649/telecommuting-work-climbs.aspxGoogle Scholar
Karlson, B., Eek, F., Ørbæk, P., & Österberg, K. (2009). Effects on sleep-related problems and self-reported health after a change of shift schedule. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014116Google Scholar
Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2019). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 72, 382–416.Google Scholar
Koh, H. K., & Sebelius, K. G. (2010). Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act. New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 1296–1299. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1008560Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Hammer, L. B., Kelly, E. L., & Moen, P. (2014). Designing work, family & health organizational change initiatives. Organizational Dynamics, 43, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.10.007Google Scholar
Koukoulaki, T. (2014). The impact of lean production on musculoskeletal and psychosocial risks: An examination of sociotechnical trends over 20 years. Applied Ergonomics, 45(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.018Google Scholar
Kuhn, K. M. (2016). The rise of the “Gig Economy” and implications for understanding work and workers. Business Horizons, 56, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.09.002Google Scholar
Landsbergis, P. A. (2003). The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people: A commentary. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 61–72.Google Scholar
Landsbergis, P. A., Cahill, J., & Schnall, P. (1999). The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on worker health. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 108–130.Google Scholar
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety (2012, Winter). 2010 Workplace Safety Index, from research to reality [online]. Hopkinton, MA: Liberty Mutual. Retrieved November 14, 2017, from: www.libertymutual.com/researchinstituteGoogle Scholar
Light, E. M. W., Kline, A. S., Drosky, M. A., & Chapman, L. S. (2015). Economic analysis of the Return-on-Investment of a worksite wellness program for a large multistate retail grocery organization: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57, 882–892. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000486Google Scholar
Loeppke, R., Taitel, M., Haufle, V., Parry, T., Kessler, R., & Jinnett, K. (2009). Health and productivity as a business strategy: a multiemployer study. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 51, 411–428.Google Scholar
Lowe, M. (2017). Uber’s gambit: Reassessing the regulatory realities of the “Gig Economy.” Cornell HR Review, 1–5.Google Scholar
Lyonette, C. (2015). Part-time work, work–life balance and gender equality. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 37, 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2015.1081225Google Scholar
Lyonette, C., Baldauf, B., & Behle, H. (2010). “Quality” part-time work: A review of the evidence. Government Equalities Office (March). Retrieved November 1, 2017, from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.459.4508&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, J. S., Dery, K., & Kolb, D. G. (2012). Engaged or just connected? Smartphones and employee engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 194–201.Google Scholar
Mehri, D. (2006). The darker side of lean: An insider’s perspective on the realities of the Toyota Production System. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 21–42.Google Scholar
Miller, O. Z. (2017). EEOC final rules on employer wellness programs. Employee Relations Law Journal, 42, 51–56.Google Scholar
Mishel, L., Gould, E., & Bivens, J. (2015). Wage stagnation in nine charts. Economic Policy Institute, 6.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. J., & Bates, P. (2011). Measuring health-related productivity losses. Population Health Management, 14, 93–98.Google Scholar
Mullins, H., Cortina, J., Drake, C., & Dalal, R. (2014). Sleepiness at work: A review and framework of how the physiology of sleepiness impacts the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1096–1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037885Google Scholar
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2009). Work organization and stress-related disorders. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/niosh/programs/workorg/Google Scholar
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2002). The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-116/pdfs/2002-116.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2012). Research compendium: The NIOSH Total Worker Health™ Program: Seminal research papers 2012. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2012-146, 2012 May: 1–214.Google Scholar
Oudhuis, M., & Tengblad, S. (2013). Experiences from implementation of lean production: Standardization versus self-management: A Swedish case study. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 3, 31.Google Scholar
Parks, K. M., & Steelman, L. A. (2008). Organizational wellness programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.58Google Scholar
Radnor, Z., & Osborne, S. P. (2013). Lean: A failed theory for public services? Public Management Review, 15, 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.748820Google Scholar
Ragsdale, J. M., & Hoover, C. S. (2016). Cell phones during nonwork time: A source of job demands and resources. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 54–60.Google Scholar
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19, 417–433.Google Scholar
Ramin, C., Devore, E. E., Wang, W., Pierre-Paul, J., Wegrzyn, L. R., & Schernhammer, E. S. (2015). Night shift work at specific age ranges and chronic disease risk factors. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 72, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2014-102292Google Scholar
Renaud, S., Morin, L., & Béchard, A. (2017). Traditional benefits versus perquisites: A longitudinal test of their differential impact on employee turnover. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 16, 91–103. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000180Google Scholar
Richardson, K.M. (2017). Managing employee stress and wellness in the new millennium. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 423–428.Google Scholar
Schill, A. L., & Chosewood, L. C. (2013). The NIOSH Total Worker HealthTM program: an overview. LWW.Google Scholar
Schonfeld, I. S., & Chang, C-H. (2017). Occupational health psychology. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Schonfeld, I. S., & Mazzola, J. J. (2015). A qualitative study of stress in individuals self-employed in solo businesses. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20, 501–513. doi:10.1037/a0038804Google Scholar
Shoss, M. K. (2017). Job insecurity: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 43, 1911–1939. doi: 0149206317691574.Google Scholar
Sinclair, R. R. & Cheung, J. H. (2015). Occupational health. In Whitbourne, S. K. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of adulthood and aging (pp. 993–997). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118528921.wbeaa166Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2015). US smartphone use in 2015. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/Google Scholar
Sõõru, E., Hein, H., & Hazak, A. (2017). Why force owls to start work early? The work schedules of R&D employees and sleep. TUT Economic Research Series, 25. Retrieved from www.tutecon.eu/index.php/TUTECON/article/view/25Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473–499.Google Scholar
Sturm, R. (2002). The effects of obesity, smoking and drinking on medical problems and costs. Health Affairs, 21, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.245Google Scholar
Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., & Naswall, K. (2002). No security: A meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 242–264.Google Scholar
Switzer, F. S., Cheung, J. H., Burns, D. K., Sinclair, R. R., Roth, P., McCubbin, J., & Tyler, P. (2017). Carrots, not sticks: Adverse impact and wellness programs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59, 250–255.Google Scholar
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 301–328.Google Scholar
Tetrick, L. E., & Quick, J. C. (2003). Prevention at work: Public health in occupational settings. In Tetrick, L. E. & Quick, J. C. (Eds). Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 3–17). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. J., Payne, S. C., & Taylor, A. B. (2015). Applicant attraction to flexible work arrangements: Separating the influence of flextime and flexplace. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 726–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12095Google Scholar
Timms, C., Brough, P., O’Driscoll, M., Kalliath, T., Siu, O. L., Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2015). Flexible work arrangements, work engagement, turnover intentions and psychological health: Flexible work arrangements, work engagement, turnover intentions and psychological health. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 53, 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12030Google Scholar
Toivanen, S., & Landsbergis, P. (2013). Lean och arbetstagarnas hälsa [Lean and worker health]. In Sederblad, P. & Abrahamsson, L. (Eds.), Lean i arbetslivet [Lean in working life]. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Veatch, O. J., Keenan, B. T., Gehrman, P. R., Malow, B. A., & Pack, A. I. (2017). Pleiotropic genetic effects influencing sleep and neurological disorders. The Lancet Neurology, 16, 158–170.Google Scholar
“Volkswagen turns of Blackberry e-mail after work hours.” (2012). Retrieved from: www.bbc.com/news/technology-16314901Google Scholar
Von Thiele Schwarz, U., Augustsson, H., Hasson, H., & Stenfors-Hayes, T. (2015). Promoting employee health by integrating health protection, health promotion, and continuous improvement: A longitudinal quasi-experimental intervention study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57, 217–225.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R., Parker, D., Napier, N. (1994). Employee health management and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30, 22–42.Google Scholar
Womack, J. P., Jones, D.T., & Roos, D. 1990. The machine that changed the world. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Yoshizaki, T., Kawano, Y., Noguchi, O., Onishi, J., Teramoto, R., Sunami, A., ... & Togo, F. (2016). Association of eating behaviours with diurnal preference and rotating shift work in Japanese female nurses: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 6, e011987. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011987Google Scholar

References

Abraham, S., & Chengalur-Smith, I. (2010). An overview of social engineering malware: Trends, tactics, and implications. Technology in Society, 32(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.07.001Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11–39). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Alge, B. J., & Hansen, S. D. (2014). Workplace monitoring and surveillance research since “1984”: A review and agenda. In Coovert, M. D. & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology (pp. 209–237). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Anandarajan, M., & Simmers, C. A. (2005). Developing human capital through personal web use in the workplace: Mapping employee perceptions. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 776–791.Google Scholar
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. doi: 10.2307/259136Google Scholar
Askew, K., Buckner, J. E., Taing, M. U., Ilie, A., Bauer, J. A., & Coovert, M. D. (2014). Explaining cyberloafing: The role of the theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 510–519. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.006Google Scholar
Axelrad, E. T., Sticha, P. J., Brdiczka, O., & Shen, J. (2013). A Bayesian network model for predicting insider threats. Paper presented at the Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 2013 IEEE. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Baruch, Y. (2005). Bullying on the net: Adverse behavior on e-mail and its impact. Information & Management, 42, 361–371. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2004.02.001Google Scholar
Beeler, J. (1983). Insiders seen posing greater threat to DP security than outsiders. ComputerWorld, 17(37), 11–12.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.349Google Scholar
Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1067–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008Google Scholar
Challenger, Gray & Christmas (2016). Employers brace for March Madness. Retrieved from www.challengergray.com/press/press-releases/employers-brace-march-madnessGoogle Scholar
Chappell, B. (2017, February 9) Ex-NSA contractor accused of taking classified information is indicted. Retrieved September 7, 2019, from www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/09/514275544/ex-nsa-contractor-indicted-for-taking-classifed-informationGoogle Scholar
Chinchani, R., Iyer, A., Ngo, H. Q., & Upadhyaya, S. (2005). Towards a theory of insider threat assessment. In 2005 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Proceedings (pp. 108–117). Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
Colligan, M. J., & Cohen, A. (2004). The role of training in promoting workplace safety and health. In Barling, J., & Frone, M. R. (Eds.), The psychology of workplace safety (pp. 223–248). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Magley, V. J., & Nelson, K. (2017). Researching rudeness: The past, present, and future of the science of incivility. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 299–313. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000089Google Scholar
Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(4), 247–265. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.247Google Scholar
Coyne, I., Farley, S., Axtell, C., Sprigg, C., Best, L., & Kwok, O. (2017). Understanding the relationship between experiencing workplace cyberbullying, employee mental strain and job satisfaction: A dysempowerment approach. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(7), 945–972. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1116454Google Scholar
Crossler, R. E., Johnston, A. C., Lowry, P. B., Hu, Q., Warkentin, M., & Baskerville, R. (2013). Future directions for behavioral information security research. Computers & Security, 32, 90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2012.09.010Google Scholar
D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2013). Navigating the extended reach: Target experiences of cyberbullying at work. Information and Organization, 23(4), 324–343. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.09.001Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S., & Girab, A. (2016). Insider threat in cyber security: What the organizational psychology literature on counterproductive work behavior can and cannot (yet) tell us. In Zaccaro, S. J., Dalal, R. S., Tetrick, L. E., & Steinke, J. A. (Eds.), Psychosocial dynamics of cyber security: New York, NY: Routledge, 122–140.Google Scholar
Determann, L. (2012). Social media privacy: A dozen myths and facts. Stanford Technology Law Review, 7, 1–14.Google Scholar
Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(4), 379–401. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00043-3Google Scholar
Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire – revised. Work and Stress, 23(1), 24–44. doi: 10.1080/02678370902815673Google Scholar
Farley, S., Coyne, I., Axtell, C., & Sprigg, C. (2016). Design, development and validation of a workplace cyberbullying measure, the WCM. Work and Stress, 30(4), 293–317. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2016.1255998Google Scholar
Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (2010). Instrumental counterproductive work behavior and the theory of planned behavior: A “cold cognitive” approach to complement “hot affective” theories of CWB. In Neider, L. L. & Schriesheim, C. A. (Eds.), Research in management. The “dark” side of management (pp. 93–114). Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Giumetti, G. W., Hatfield, A. L., Scisco, J. L., Schroeder, A. N., Muth, E. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (2013). What a rude e-mail! Examining the differential effects of incivility versus support on mood, energy, engagement, and performance in an online context. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 297–309. doi: 10.1037/a0032851Google Scholar
Giumetti, G. W., McKibben, E. S., Hatfield, A. L., Schroeder, A. N., & Kowalski, R. M. (2012). Cyber incivility @ work: The new age of interpersonal deviance. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 15(3), 148–154. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0336Google Scholar
Glassman, J., Prosch, M., & Shao, B. B. M. (2015). To monitor or not to monitor: Effectiveness of a cyberloafing countermeasure. Information & Management, 52(2), 170–182. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.08.001Google Scholar
Greitzer, F. L., Kangas, L. J., Noonan, C. F., & Dalton, A. C. (2010). Identifying at-risk employees: A behavioral model for predicting potential insider threats. Arlington, VA: US Department of Energy,Google Scholar
Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 30–42. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00224Google Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). “Incivility, social undermining, bullying ... oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 499–519. doi: 10.1002/job.689Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513Google Scholar
Hoel, H., Sheehan, M. J., Cooper, C. L., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Organisational effects of workplace bullying. In Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 129–148). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Jex, S. M., & Britt, T. W. (2014). Organizational psychology: A scientist-practitioner approach (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management, 34(5), 978–1008. doi: 10.1177/0149206308318614Google Scholar
Karasek, R. A. Jr. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. doi: 10.2307/2392498Google Scholar
Koerner, B.L. (2016, Oct 23). Inside the cyberattack that shocked the US government. Retrieved September 7, 2019, from www.wired.com/2016/10/inside-cyberattack-shocked-us-government/Google Scholar
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618Google Scholar
Krajcevska, A., Pindek, S., & Spector, P. E. (2017). Cyberloafing as an adaptive response to boredom. Paper presented at the Southern Management Association 2017 Conference, Saint Pete Beach, FL.Google Scholar
Krischer, M. M., Penney, L. M., & Hunter, E. M. (2010). Can counterproductive work behaviors be productive? CWB as emotion-focused coping. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(2), 154–166. doi: 10.1037/a0018349Google Scholar
Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., & Ng, Z.-W. (2005). Egocentrism over e-mail: can we communicate as well as we think? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 925–936. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.925Google Scholar
Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414853Google Scholar
Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157–170. doi: 10.1177/0143034306064547Google Scholar
Liberman, B., Seidman, G., McKenna, K. V. A., & Buffardi, L. E. (2011). Employee job attitudes and organizational characteristics as predictors of cyberloafing. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2192–2199. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.015Google Scholar
Lim, V. K. G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 675–694. doi: 10.1002/job.161Google Scholar
Lim, V. K. G., & Chen, D. J. Q. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: Gain or drain on work? Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(4), 343–353. doi: 10.1080/01449290903353054Google Scholar
Lim, V. K. G., & Teo, T. S. H. (2005). Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore – An exploratory study. Information & Management, 42(8), 1081–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2004.12.002Google Scholar
Lim, V. K. G., & Teo, T. S. H. (2009). Mind your E-manners: Impact of cyber incivility on employees’ work attitude and behavior. Information & Management, 46(8), 419–425. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2009.06.006Google Scholar
Lyons, B. D., Hoffman, B. J., Bommer, W. H., Kennedy, C. L., & Hetrick, A. L. (2016). Off-duty deviance: Organizational policies and evidence for two prevention strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(4), 463–483.Google Scholar
Magklaras, G. B., & Furnell, S. M. (2002). Insider threat prediction tool: Evaluating the probability of IT misuse. Computers & Security, 21(1), 62–73.Google Scholar
Mehan, J. E. (2016). Insider threat: A guide to understanding, detecting, and defending against the enemy from within: Ely, UK: IT Governance Publishing.Google Scholar
National Labor Relations Board (2012). The NLRB and social media. Retrieved September 9, 2019, from www.nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/rights/nlrb-and-social-mediaGoogle Scholar
Neal, A., & Griffith, M. A. (2002). Safety climate and safety behaviour. Australian Journal of Management, 27(Special Issue), 67–75.Google Scholar
Niedl, K. (1996). Mobbing and well-being: Economic and personnel development implications. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 239–249. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414857Google Scholar
nobullying.com. (2017). The top six unforgettable cyberbullying cases ever. Retrieved September 7, 2019, from https://nobullying.com/six-unforgettable-cyber-bullying-cases/Google Scholar
Nurse, J. R. C., Buckley, O., Legg, P. A., Goldsmith, M., Creese, S., Wright, G. R. T., & Whitty, M. (2014). Understanding insider threat: A framework for characterising attacks. Paper presented at the Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 2014 IEEE. San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
O’Neill, T. A., Hambley, L. A., & Bercovich, A. (2014). Prediction of cyberslacking when employees are working away from the office. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 291–298. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.015Google Scholar
Park, Y., Fritz, C., & Jex, S. M. (2015). Daily cyber incivility and distress: The moderating roles of resources at work and home. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206315576796Google Scholar
Pfleeger, S. L., Predd, J. B., Hunker, J., & Bulford, C. (2010). Insiders behaving badly: Addressing bad actors and their actions. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 5(1), 169–179. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2009.2039591Google Scholar
Porath, C., & Pearson, C. (2013). The price of incivility. Harvard Business Review, 91(1/2), 114–121.Google Scholar
Privitera, C., & Campbell, M. A. (2009). Cyberbullying: The new face of workplace bullying? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 395–400. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0025Google Scholar
Purcell, K., & Rainie, L. (2014). Technology’s impact on workers. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/2014/12/30/technologys-impact-on-workers/Google Scholar
Restubog, S. L. D., Garcia, P., Toledano, L. S., Amarnani, R. K., Tolentino, L. R., & Tang, R. L. (2011). Yielding to (cyber)-temptation: Exploring the buffering role of self-control in the relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing behavior in the workplace. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(2), 247–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.01.006Google Scholar
Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163.Google Scholar
Salm, L. (2017). 70% of employers are snooping candidates’ social media profiles. Retrieved from www.careerbuilder.com/advice/social-media-survey-2017Google Scholar
Sánchez Abril, P., Levin, A., & Del Riego, A. (2012). Blurred boundaries: Social media privacy and the twenty-first-century employee. American Business Law Journal, 49(1), 63–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2011.01127.xGoogle Scholar
Schilpzand, P., de Pater, I. E., & Erez, A. (2016). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S57–S88. doi: 10.1002/job.1976Google Scholar
Shaw, E. D. (2006). The role of behavioral research and profiling in malicious cyber insider investigations. Digital Investigation, 3(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2006.01.006Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.xGoogle Scholar
Snyman, R., & Loh, J. M. I. (2015). Cyberbullying at work: The mediating role of optimism between cyberbullying and job outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.050Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor–emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446–460. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005Google Scholar
Stoughton, J. W., Thompson, L. F., & Meade, A. W. (2015). Examining applicant reactions to the use of social networking websites in pre-employment screening. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1), 73–88. doi: 10.1007/s10869-013-9333-6Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. doi: 10.2307/1556375Google Scholar
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014Google Scholar
Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–780. doi: 10.1037/a0019214Google Scholar
Van den Brande, W., Baillien, E., De Witte, H., Vander Elst, T., & Godderis, L. (2016). The role of work stressors, coping strategies and coping resources in the process of workplace bullying: A systematic review and development of a comprehensive model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 29, 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.06.004Google Scholar
Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., Vandebosch, H., Erreygers, S., & De Witte, H. (2017). The dark side of working online: Towards a definition and an Emotion Reaction model of workplace cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 324–334. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.055Google Scholar
Warkentin, M., & Willison, R. (2009). Behavioral and policy issues in information systems security: The insider threat. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 101–105. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2009.12Google Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.Google Scholar
Wu, T. C., Chen, C. H., & Li, C. C. (2008). A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.11.001Google Scholar
Yang, L. Q., Caughlin, D. E., Gazica, M. W., Truxillo, D. M., & Spector, P. E. (2014). Workplace mistreatment climate and potential employee and organizational outcomes: A meta-analytic review from the target’s perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 315–335. doi: 10.1037/a0036905Google Scholar
Zacharatos, A., Barling, J., & Iverson, R. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 77–93. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.77Google Scholar
Zakrzewski, C. (2016). The key to getting workers to stop wasting time online. Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/the-key-to-getting-workers-to-stop-wasting-time-online-1457921545Google Scholar

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.Google Scholar
Anderson, S., & Klinger, S. (2016, December 15). As working families face rising retirement insecurity, CEOs enjoy platinum pensions. Institute for Policy Studies. Retrieved from https://ips-dc.org/report-tale-two-retirementsGoogle Scholar
Arthur, M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: A new perspective for organizational inquiry. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 295–306.Google Scholar
Auguste, B. (2018, July 5). Skills and tomorrow’s job report: The usual suspects. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/byronauguste/2018/07/05/skills-and-tomorrows-jobs-report-the-usual-suspects-warning-spoilers/#2cf3935e2af8Google Scholar
Bapuji, H. (2015). Individuals, interactions and institutions: How economic inequality affects organizations. Human Relations, 68(7), 1059–1083.Google Scholar
Baron, J. N., & Pfeffer, J. (1994). The social psychology of organizations and inequality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(3), 190–209.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. E., & Jean, V. A. (2015). Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial–organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 84–113.Google Scholar
Bidwell, M., Briscoe, F., Fernandez-Mateo, I., & Sterling, A. (2013). The employment relationship and inequality: How and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. Academy of Management Annuals, 7(1), 61–121.Google Scholar
Blau, G. (2007). Does a corresponding set of variables for explaining voluntary organizational turnover transfer to explaining voluntary occupational turnover? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 135–148.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, M. (1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
Bobb, C. (2016, May 17). CEOs paid 335 times average rank-and-file worker; Outsourcing results in even higher inequality. The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Retrieved from https://aflcio.org/2016/5/17/ceos-paid-335- times-average-rank-and-file-worker-outsourcing-results-even-higherGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (2018a). Job openings and labor turnover – May 2018. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/jolts.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (2018b). Job openings and labor turnover survey (JOLTS) [Database]. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/jlt/data.htmGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (2018c). Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey [Database]. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab11.htmGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (2018d). Usual weekly earnings of wage and salary workers (quarter). Retrieved from www.bls.gov/cps/earnings.htmGoogle Scholar
Charles-Coll, J. A. (2011). Understanding income inequality: concept, causes and measurement. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 1(3), 17–28.Google Scholar
Chen, C. A., & Brudney, J. L. (2009). A cross-sector comparison of using nonstandard workers: Explaining use and impacts on the employment relationship. Administration and Society, 41(3), 313–339.Google Scholar
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018). The new era workplace relationships: Is social exchange theory still relevant?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11, 456–481.Google Scholar
CIETT (2015). “Economic report,” International Confederation of Private Employment Services (based on data of 2013/2014)Google Scholar
Claes, R. (2005). Organization promises in the triangular psychological contract as perceived by temporary agency workers, agencies, and client organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 131–142.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.Google Scholar
Connelly, C. E., & Gallagher, D. G. (2006). Independent and dependent contracting: Meaning and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 95–106.Google Scholar
Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotterell, N., Eisenberger, R., & Speicher, H. (1992). Inhibiting effects of reciprocation wariness on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 658–668.Google Scholar
Cowherd, D. M., & Levine, D. I. (1992). Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2), 302–320.Google Scholar
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M. & Kessler, I. (2002). Contingent and non-contingent working in local government: Contrasting psychological contracts. Public Administration, 80(1), 77–101.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.Google Scholar
Davis, G. (2009). The rise and fall of finance and the end of the society of organizations. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 27–44.Google Scholar
De Cuyper, N., De Jong, J., De Witte, H., Isaksson, K., Rigotti, T., & Schalk, R. (2008). Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment: Towards a conceptual model. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 25–51.Google Scholar
De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2006). The impact of job insecurity and contract type on attitudes, well-being and behavioural reports: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(3), 395–409.Google Scholar
De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2007). Job insecurity in temporary versus permanent workers: Associations with attitudes, well-being, and behaviour. Work & Stress, 21(1), 65–84.Google Scholar
De Cuyper, N., Notelaers, G., & De Witte, H. (2009). Job insecurity and employability in fixed-term contractors, agency workers, and permanent workers: Associations with job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(2), 193–205.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. L. (2007). How to stop harassment: professional construction of legal compliance in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 112(4), 1203–1243.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812–820.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Rockstuhl, T., Shoss, M.K., Wen, X., & Dulebohn, J. (2019). Is the employee–organization relationship dying or thriving? A temporal meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(8), 1036–1057.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Farber, H. S. (2008). Employment insecurity: The decline in worker–firm attachment in the United States (Working Paper No. 530). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Industrial Relations Section.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.Google Scholar
Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (2012). Resource theory of social exchange. In Handbook of social resource theory (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Fragoso, J. L., & Kleiner, B. H. (2005). How to distinguish between independent contractors and employees. Management Research News, 28(2), 136–149.Google Scholar
Gakovic, A., & Tetrick, L. E. (2003). Perceived organizational support and work status: A comparison of the employment relationships of part-time and full-time employees attending university classes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 649–666.Google Scholar
Gallagher, D. G., & Parks, J. M. L. (2001). I pledge thee my troth ... contingently: Commitment and the contingent work relationship. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 181–208.Google Scholar
Gallie, D., Felstead, A., Green, F., & Inanc, H. (2017). The hidden face of job insecurity. Work, Employment and Society, 31(1), 36–53.Google Scholar
GAO (General Accounting Office) (2000, December 29). Unemployment insurance: Role as safety net for low-wage workers is limited. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
George, E., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2017). Understanding nonstandard work arrangements: Using research to inform practice. SHRM-SIOP Science of HR Series. Retrieved from www.siop.org/siop-shrm/Google Scholar
Ghiselli, E. E. (1974). Some perspectives for industrial psychology. American Psychologist, 29(2), 80–87.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.Google Scholar
Hall, D. T. (1996). Protean careers of the 21st century. The Academy of Management Executive, 10(4), 8–16.Google Scholar
Hall, J. V, & Krueger, A. B. (2016). An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 71(3), 705–732.Google Scholar
Harrison, D., & Morath, E. (2018, July 4). In this economy, quitters are winning. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/in-this-economy-quitters-are-winning-1530702001Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 341–365.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015 (No. w22667). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Keim, A. C., Landis, R. S., Pierce, C. A., & Earnest, D. R. (2014). Why do employees worry about their jobs? A meta-analytic review of predictors of job insecurity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 269–290.Google Scholar
Keys, B. J., & Danziger, S. H. (2008). The risk of unemployment among disadvantaged and advantaged male workers, 1968–2003. In Newman, K. S. (Ed.), Laid off, laid low: Political and economic consequences of employment insecurity (pp. 56–73). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, K. Y., Eisenberger, R., & Baik, K. (2016). Perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment: Moderating influence of perceived organizational competence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 558–583.Google Scholar
Kondrasuk, J. N., Reed, L. J., & Jurinski, J. J. (2001). The dangers of misclassifying “employees”: Microsoft litigation emphasizes distinctions between employees and nontraditional workers. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13(4), 165–173.Google Scholar
Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884.Google Scholar
Lake, C. J., Highhouse, S., & Shrift, A. G. (2018). Validation of the job-hopping motives scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(3), 531–548.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Peccei, R. (2007). Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem in the context of job insecurity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(6), 661–685.Google Scholar
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Kraimer, M. L., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2003). The dual commitments of contingent workers: An examination of contingents’ commitment to the agency and the organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 609–625.Google Scholar
Lübke, C., & Erlinghagen, M. (2014). Self-perceived job insecurity across Europe over time: Does changing context matter?. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(4), 319–336.Google Scholar
Maltarich, M. A., Nyberg, A. J., & Reilly, G. J. (2010). A conceptual and empirical analysis of the cognitive ability–voluntary turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1058–1070.Google Scholar
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Martin, J., & Harder, J. W. (1994). Bread and roses: Justice and the distribution of financial and socioemotional rewards in organizations. Social Justice Research, 7(3), 241–264.Google Scholar
Matos, K., Galinsky, E., & Bond, J. T. (2017, March 8). National Study of Employers. The Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/pages/national-study-of-employers.aspxGoogle Scholar
McCall, L., & Percheski, C. (2010). Income inequality: New trends and research directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 329–347.Google Scholar
Millward, L. J., & Hopkins, L. J. (1998). Psychological contracts, organizational and job commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(16), 1530–1556.Google Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)(2018). Part-time employment rate (indicator). doi: 10.1787/f2ad596c-enGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the work force. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 382–407.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389–400.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 511–541.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1995). Changing individual–organization attachments: A two-way street. In Howard, A. (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series: The changing nature of work (pp. 290–321). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Saez, E. (2016, June 30). Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States. Retrieved from https://eml.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schein, E. H. (1980). Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schor, J. B. (1998). The overspent American. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shore, L. M., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., & Tetrick, L. E. (Eds.) (2012). The employee–organization relationship: Applications for the 21st century. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework. In Trends in organizational behavior (pp. 91–109). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Lynch, P., & Barksdale, K. (2006). Social and economic exchange: Construct development and validation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 837–867.Google Scholar
Shoss, M. K. (2017). Job insecurity: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1911–1939.Google Scholar
Smith, T. W., Davern, M., Freese, J., & Hout, M. (2018). General social surveys, 1972–2016 [Data file and code book]. Retrieved from http://gss.norc.org/get-the-data/spssGoogle Scholar
Somashekhar, S. P., Sepúlveda, M. J., & Norden, A. D. (2017). Double-blind concordance study of breast cancer treatment recommendations between multidisciplinary tumour board and an artificial intelligence advisor – Watson for Oncology. Journal of Cancer Research & Therapeutics, 13, pS100–S100.Google Scholar
Sverke, M., & Hellgren, J. (2002). The nature of job insecurity: Understanding employment uncertainty on the brink of a new millennium. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 23–42.Google Scholar
Thurman, J. E., & Trah, G. (1990). Part-time work in international perspective. International Labour Review, 129, 23–40.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee–organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089–1121.Google Scholar
Van Bastelaer, A., Lemaître, G., & Marianna, P. (1997). The definition of part-time work for the purpose of international comparisons. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers no. 22. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Vander Elst, T., De Cuyper, N., Baillien, E., Niesen, W., & De Witte, H. (2016). Perceived control and psychological contract breach as explanations of the relationships between job insecurity, job strain and coping reactions: towards a theoretical integration. Stress and Health, 32, 100–116.Google Scholar
Van Dyne, L., and Ang, S. (1998), Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 692–703.Google Scholar
Walker, I. & Smith, H. J. (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. N. (2015). Worker’s expectations about losing and replacing their jobs: 35 years of change (Monthly Labor Review). Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/workers-expectations-about-losing-and-replacing-their-jobs.htmGoogle Scholar
Wilkin, C. L. (2013). I can’t get no job satisfaction: Meta-analysis comparing permanent and contingent workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 47–64.Google Scholar
Woo, S. E. (2011). A study of Ghiselli’s hobo syndrome. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 461–469.Google Scholar

References

Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4, 1043–1171.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2017). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. Retrieved from www.sipotra.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Robots-and-Jobs-Evidence-from-US-Labor-Markets.pdfGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P., andHowitt, P. (1994). Growth and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies, 61, 477–494.Google Scholar
Arntz, M., Gregory, T. and Zierahn, U. (2016), The Risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 189. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-enGoogle Scholar
Autor, D. H. (2013). The ‘task approach’ to labor markets: An overview. Journal for Labour Market Research, 46, 185–199.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 3–30.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H., & Handel, M. J. (2013). Putting tasks to the test: Human capital, job tasks, and wages. Journal of Labor Economics, 31, 59–96.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1279–1333.Google Scholar
Bakhshi, H., Downing, J., Osborne, M., & Schneider, P. (2017). The future of skills: employment in 2030. Retrieved from https://futureskills.pearson.com/research/assets/pdfs/technical-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bergman, M. E., & Jean, V. A. (2016). Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial–organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9, 84–113.Google Scholar
Bingham, A. J., Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2018). Ahead of the curve: Implementation challenges in personalized learning school models. Educational Policy, 32, 454–489.Google Scholar
Bowles, J. (2014), The computerization of European jobs, Bruegel Technical Report. Retrieved from http://bruegel.org/2014/07/the-computerisation-of-european-jobs/ http://bruegel.org/2014/07/chart-of-the-week-54-of-eu-jobs-at-risk-of-computerisation/Google Scholar
Brawley, A. M. (2017). The big, gig picture: We can’t assume the same constructs matter. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10, 687–696.Google Scholar
Bronklow, A. (2018, February). Stockton rolls out universal income experiment. Retrieved from https://sf.curbed.com/2018/2/1/16959714/stockton-universal-income-economy-familiesGoogle Scholar
Bryant, D. (2017). Protecting the future of work. The Aspen Institute. Retrieved from www.aspeninstitute.org/blog-posts/protecting-future-work/Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., and McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machines : How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.Google Scholar
Brzeski, C. & Burk, I. (2015). Die Roboter kommen. Folgen der Automatisierung für den deutschen Arbeitsmarkt [The robots come. Consequences of automation for the German labour market]. ING DiBa Economic Research. Retrieved from https://ingwb.de/media/1398074/ing-diba-economic-research-die-roboter-kommen.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017). Employment by major industry sector. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/emp/tables/employment-by-major-industry-sector.htmGoogle Scholar
Cagnin, C., Havas, A., & Saritas, O. (2013). Future-oriented technology analysis: Its potential to address disruptive transformations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 379–385.Google Scholar
Caputo, R. (Ed.) (2012). Basic income guarantee and politics: International experiences and perspectives on the viability of income guarantee. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Cheng, G. H. L., & Chan, D. K. S. (2008). Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta‐analytic review. Applied Psychology, 57, 272–303.Google Scholar
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018). The new era workplace relationships: Is social exchange theory still relevant?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11, 456–481.Google Scholar
Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2015, November). Four fundamentals of workplace automation. McKinsey Quarterly, 29, 1–9. Retrieved from www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/four-fundamentals-of-workplace-automationGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. M. (2018). Expert systems, artificial intelligence and the behavioral co-ordinates of skill. In The question of artificial intelligence. New York, NY: Routledge, 258–281.Google Scholar
Cooper, Y. (2018, August). Automation could destroy millions of jobs. We have to deal with it now. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/06/automation-destroy-millions-jobs-changeGoogle Scholar
Danaher, J. (2017). Will life be worth living in a world without work? Technological unemployment and the meaning of life. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23, 41–64.Google Scholar
Danneels, E. (2004). Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 246–258.Google Scholar
De Fruyt, F., Wille, B., & John, O. P. (2015). Employability in the 21st century: Complex (interactive) problem solving and other essential skills. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 276–281.Google Scholar
DeCanio, S. J. (2016). Robots and humans: complements or substitutes?. Journal of Macroeconomics, 49, 280–291.Google Scholar
Decker, M., Fischer, M., & Ott, I. (2017). Service robotics and human labor: A first technology assessment of substitution and cooperation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 87, 348–354.Google Scholar
Diamandis, P. H., & Kotler, S. (2012). Abundance: The future is better than you think. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Dimitri, C., Effland, A. B., Conklin, N. C., & Dimitri, C. (2005). The 20th century transformation of US agriculture and farm policy, 3. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
Dong, Y., Simões, M. L., Marois, E., Dimopoulos, G. (2018). CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated gene knockout of Anopheles gambiae FREP1 suppresses malaria parasite infection. PLOS Pathogens, 14. Retrieved from e1006898 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006898Google Scholar
Dychtwald, K., & Flower, J. (1989). Age wave. New York, NY: JP Tarcher.Google Scholar
Eichhorst, W. (2015). Do we have to be afraid of the future world of work?, IZA Policy Paper, No. 102, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.Google Scholar
European Society for Medical Oncology. (2018, May) Man against machine: AI is better than dermatologists at diagnosing skin cancer. ScienceDaily. Retrieved from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/05/180528190839.htm.Google Scholar
Finlay, R. (1991). The treasure-ships of Zheng He: Chinese maritime imperialism in the Age of Discovery. Terrae Incognitae, 23, 1–12.Google Scholar
Frazee, G. (2018, August). Ontario is canceling its basic income experiment. Retrieved from www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/making-sense/ontario-is-canceling-its-basic- income-experimentGoogle Scholar
Fredette, J., Marom, R., Steiner, K., & Witters, L. (2012). The promise and peril of hyperconnectivity for organizations and societies. The global information technology report (pp. 113–119). World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30679485.pdf#page=139Google Scholar
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2013). The future of employment. How susceptible are jobs to computerization? (Working paper.) Retrieved from www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdfGoogle Scholar
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.Google Scholar
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2018). Automation and the future of work – understanding the numbers. (Working paper.) Oxford Martin School. Retrieved from www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/opinion/view/404Google Scholar
Gillespie, P. (2017). Intuit: Gig economy is 34% of US workforce. CNN Money. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/24/news/economy/gig-economy-intuit/Google Scholar
Goodman, P. (2018, May). Free cash to fight income inequality? California city is first in US to try. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/05/30/business/stockton-basic- income.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gregory, T., Salomons, A., and Zierahn, U. (2016). Racing with or against the machine? Evidence from Europe. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 16. Retrieved from http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp16053.pdfGoogle Scholar
Grossman, D. (2017). This giant 3D printer could build you a house today. Popular Mechanics. Retrieved from www.popularmechanics.com/technology/infrastructure/a26252/3d-printer-build-house-mit/Google Scholar
Hagel, J., Brown, J. S., Samoylova, T., & Lui, M. (2013). From exponential technologies to exponential innovation. Deloitte Center for the Edge, San Jose, California. Retrieved from www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/es/Documents/sectorpublico/Deloitte_ES_Sector-Publico_From-exponentialtechnologies-to-exponential-innovation. pdf.Google Scholar
Ismail, S., Malone, M. S., & Van Geest, Y. (2014). Exponential organizations. Why new organizations are ten times better, faster, and cheaper than yours (and what to do about it). New York, NY: Diversion Books.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. (2018, August). Worrying about robots stealing our jobs? How silly. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/20/robots-stealing-jobs-digital- ageGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w22667Google Scholar
Keim, A. C., Landis, R. S., Pierce, C. A., & Earnest, D. R. (2014). Why do employees worry about their jobs? A meta-analytic review of predictors of job insecurity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 269–290.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1973). The monetary theory of production (1933). In The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes (vol. 13, pp. 408–411). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kotecki, P. (2018, August). An ambitious basic income experiment started by a major Silicon Valley tech accelerator has been delayed. Retrieved from www.businessinsider.com/basic-income-experiment-started-by-y-combinator- delayed-until-2019-2018-8Google Scholar
Kottasova, I. (2016, January). Smart robots could soon steal your job. Retrieved from https://money.cnn.com/2016/01/15/news/economy/smart-robots-stealing-jobs- davos/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, K. M. (2016). The rise of the “Gig Economy” and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 157–162.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (2004). The law of accelerating returns. In Alan Turing: Life and legacy of a great thinker. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, 381–416.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (2014). The singularity is near. In Sandler, R. L. (Ed.), Ethics and emerging technologies (pp. 393–406). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Levathes, L. (2014). When China ruled the seas: The treasure fleet of the dragon throne, 1405–1433. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, X., & Zhang, T. (2017, April). An exploration on artificial intelligence application: From security, privacy and ethic perspective. In Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis (ICCCBDA), 2017 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 2nd International Conference, 416–420.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H., & Stephany, F. (2018). Back to the future: Changing job profiles in the digital age, 13. Agenda Austria Working Paper. Retrieved from www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/175270/1/1013982509.pdfGoogle Scholar
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Madgavkar, A., & Lund, S. (2017). Technology, jobs, and the future of work. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from www.mckinsey.com/featured- insights/employment-and-growth/technology-jobs-and-the-future-of-workGoogle Scholar
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P., & Dewhurst, M. (2017, January). A future that works: Automation, employment, and productivity. Retrieved from www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/digital-disruption/harnessing-automation-for-a-future-that-worksGoogle Scholar
Mason, P. (2016, February). Automation may mean a post-work society but we shouldn’t be afraid. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/feb/17/automation-may-mean-a-post-work-society-but-we-shouldnt-be-afraidGoogle Scholar
McAfee, A. (2013). Andrew McAfee: What will future jobs look like? [Video file]. Retrieved from www.ted.com/talks/andrew_mcafee_what_will_future_jobs_look_like/up-nextGoogle Scholar
Meikle, S. (1997). Aristotle’s economic thought. OUP Catalogue. Oxford University Press, number 9780198152255. https://ideas.repec.org/b/oxp/obooks/9780198152255.htmlGoogle Scholar
Melendez, C. (2018, August). AI: Creating a paradigm shift in how we work. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/08/01/ai-creating-a-paradigm-shift- in-how-we-work/#10002b1f2d62Google Scholar
Mims, C. (2017, January). Technology versus the middle class. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/technology-vs-the-middle-class- 1485107698Google Scholar
Mitzner, T. L., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014). Identifying the potential for robotics to assist older adults in different living environments. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6, 213–227.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1992). Technological inertia in economic history. Journal of Economic History, 52, 325–338.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J., Vickers, C., & Ziebarth, N. L. (2015). The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: Is this time different? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 31–50.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1965). Moore’s Law, “Cramming more components onto integrated circuits.” Electronics Magazine, 38, 114–117.Google Scholar
Moore, P., & Robinson, A. (2016). The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society, 18, 2774–2792.Google Scholar
Morelli, N., Illingworth, A. J., & Handler, C. (2015). Questions about IO psychology’s future. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8, 269–276.Google Scholar
Morrison, M. (2017, April). SIOP shaken & stirred: What if work becomes optional in the future? Presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Mrass, V.; Peters, C. & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). New work organization through crowdworking platforms – a case study. In: Zukunftsprojekt Arbeitswelt 4.0, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Nagy, B., Farmer, J. D., Bui, Q. M., & Trancik, J. E. (2013). Statistical basis for predicting technological progress. PLOS ONE, 8, e52669. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052669Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Information technology and the US workforce: Where are we and where do we go from here? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/24649Google Scholar
Neubert, J. C., Mainert, J., Kretzschmar, A., & Greiff, S. (2015). The assessment of 21st century skills in industrial and organizational psychology: Complex and collaborative problem solving. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 238–268.Google Scholar
Oliver, B. (2015). Redefining graduate employability and work-integrated learning: Proposals for effective higher education in disrupted economies. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6, 56–65.Google Scholar
O’Neill, C. (2017). Taylorism, the European science of work, and the quantified self at work. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42, 600–621.Google Scholar
Oppitz, M., & Tomsu, P. (2018). New paradigms and big disruptive things. In Inventing the cloud century (pp. 547–596). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Otieno, P. S., & Govender, K. (2018). Managing airport service quality: the impact of self- service technologies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13. Retrieved from doi:10.21511/imfi.13(3- 2).2016.11Google Scholar
Pajarinen, M. & Rouvinen, P. (2014), “Computerization threatens one third of Finnish employment. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA) Brief, 22, 1–6. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/profile/Mika_Pajarinen/publication/27172 4486_Computerization_Threatens_One_Third_of_Finnish_Employment/links/54d08b8f0cf298d65667070b/Computerization-Threatens-One-Third-of-Finnish-Employment.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pender, K., (2017, September). Oakland group plans to launch nation’s biggest basic-income research project. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved from www.sfchronicle.com/business/networth/article/Oakland-group-plans-to-launch- nation-s-biggest-12219073.phpGoogle Scholar
Peter, L. (2018). No plans to expand Finland basic income trial. BBC News. Retrieved from www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43866700Google Scholar
Pilkington, M. (2016). Blockchain technology: principles and applications. In Olleros, F. X. & Zhegu, M. (Eds.), Research handbook on digital transformations (pp. 225–253). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Postel‐Vinay, F. (2002). The dynamics of technological unemployment. International Economic Review, 43, 737–760.Google Scholar
Quendler, E., & Lamb, M. (2016). Learning as a lifelong process – meeting the challenges of the changing employability landscape: competences, skills and knowledge for sustainable development. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 26, 273–293.Google Scholar
Rainie, L., & Anderson, J. (2017). The future of jobs and jobs training. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/03/the-future-of-jobs-and-jobs-training/Google Scholar
Rampell, C. (2015). The robots aren’t threatening your job. Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dont-fear-the-robots/2015/04/09/e7ea1316-def3-11e4-a1b2ed88bc190d2_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.7ac743eded3cGoogle Scholar
Reinsel, D., Gantz, J., & Rydning, J. (2017, April). Data age 2025: The evolution of data to life-critical. Don’t focus on big data; focus on the data that’s big. IDC, Seagate. Retrieved from https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/workforce/Seagate-WP-DataAge2025-March-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Riggio, R. E., & Saggi, K. (2015). Incorporating “soft skills” into the collaborative problem-solving equation. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 281–284.Google Scholar
Rotman, D. (2013, June). How technology is destroying jobs. Technology Review, 16, 28–35. Retrieved from www.technologyreview.com/s/515926/how-technology-is-destroying-jobs/Google Scholar
Russell, S., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015). Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. Ai Magazine, 36, 105–114.Google Scholar
Schaller, R. R. (1997). Moore’s law: past, present and future. IEEE Spectrum, 34, 52–59.Google Scholar
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. New York, NY: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Seagrave, K. (2012). Vending machines: An American social history. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Sharkey, N. (2008). The ethical frontiers of robotics. Science, 322, 1800–1801.Google Scholar
Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34, 177–193.Google Scholar
Singla, R., Edgcumbe, P., Pratt, P., Nguan, C., & Rohling, R. (2017) Intra-operative ultrasound-based augmented reality guidance for laparoscopic surgery. Healthcare Technology Letters, 4, 204–209.Google Scholar
Sliter, K. A. (2015). Assessing 21st century skills: Competency modeling to the rescue. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 284–289.Google Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2016). The new talent landscape: Recruiting difficulty and skills shortages. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and surveys/Documents/SHRM%20New%20Talent%20Landscape%20Recruiting%20Difficulty%20Skills.pdfGoogle Scholar
Su, R., Golubovich, J., & Robbins, S. B. (2015). Bridging science and practice: Toward a standard, evidence-based framework of 21st century skills. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 289–294.Google Scholar
Sun, J., Yan, J., & Zhang, K. Z. (2016). Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities. Financial Innovation, 2, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0040-yGoogle Scholar
Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Theis, T. N., & Wong, H. S. P. (2017). The end of Moore’s Law: A new beginning for information technology. Computing in Science & Engineering, 19, 41–50.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (2015). A world without work. The Atlantic, 316, 50–61.Google Scholar
Toutain, J. (2013). The economic life of the ancient world. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. The Academy of Management Executive, 12, 17–29.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. (2018, May). Google’s AI sounds like a human on the phone, should we be worried? The Verge. Retrieved from www.theverge.com/2018/5/9/17334658/google-ai-phone-call-assistant-duplex-ethical-social-implicationsGoogle Scholar
Weiss, H. M. (2013). Working as human nature. In Ford, J. K., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Ryan, A. M. (Eds.), The nature of work: Advances in psychological theory, methods, and practice (pp. 35–47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2011). Experiencing work: An essay on a person‐centric work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 83–97.Google Scholar
Whitehouse – Office of the President (2016). Artificial intelligence, automation, and the economy. Executive Office of the President. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse. archives. gov/sites/whitehouse. gov/files/documents/Artificial-Intelligence-Automation-Economy. PDF.Google Scholar
Williams, R. S. (2017). What’s next? The end of Moore’s law. Computing in Science & Engineering, 19, 7–13.Google Scholar
Woodbury, S. A. (2017). Universal basic income. The American middle class: An economic encyclopedia of progress and poverty [2 volumes]. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. (2016). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_New_Vision_for_Education.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Economic Forum. (2018). The Future of Jobs Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/wef_future_of_jobs_2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wyman, N. (2018, June). Fear not the job-stealing robots. Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/nicholaswyman/2018/06/13/fear-not-the-job-stealing- robots/#34295d595f5aGoogle Scholar
Yeginsu, C. (2018, February). If workers slack off this wristband will know. And Amazon has a patent for it. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/02/01/technology/amazon-wristband-tracking- privacy.htmlGoogle Scholar

References

Adrian Hodges Advisory (2017). Opportunities for women: Challenging harmful social norms and gender stereotypes to unlock women’s potential. Retrieved from www.unilever.com/Images/unilever-opportunities-for-women_tcm244-500987_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, volume 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 855–879). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2013). Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: Psychological foundations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, 314–332.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451–474.Google Scholar
Arar, S. (2018, February 14). UNICEF’s youth engagement pathway vision launched. The Jordan Times. Retrieved from www.jordantimes.com/news/local/unicef%E2%80%99s-youth-engagement-pathway-vision-launchedGoogle Scholar
Barling, J., Christie, A., & Hoption, C. (2011). Performance measurement at work: A multilevel perspective. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, volume 1: Building and developing the organization (pp. 183–240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.Google Scholar
Bhawuk, D. P. S., Carr, S. C., Gloss, A. E., & Foster Thompson, L. (2014). Poverty reduction through positive work cycles: Exploring the role of information about work, culture and diversity, and organizational justice. In Al-Atiqi, S. (Ed.), Barriers to and opportunities for poverty reduction: Prospects for private-sector led interventions (Background paper to the United Nations Development Programme 2014 foundational report, The role of the private sector in inclusive development: Barriers and opportunities at the base of the pyramid). Istanbul, Turkey: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1701–1719.Google Scholar
Brodock, K., & Massam, G. (2016). How and why to hire a diverse workforce: What you need to know. Strategic HR Review, 15(5), 208–213.Google Scholar
Brown, K.G., & Sitzmann, T. (2011). Training and employee development for improved performance. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, volume 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. 469–503). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Bowers, C. (2011). Team development and functioning. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, volume 1: Building and developing the organization (pp. 597–650). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Carr, S. C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility has gone global: The UN Global Compact. The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 48(2), 99–102.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38, 268–295.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 271–286.Google Scholar
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A. S., & Sonesh, S. (2011). The appraisal and management of performance at work. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, volume 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. 255–279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Derous, E., Ryan, A. M., & Nguyen, H. D. (2012). Multiple categorization in resume screening: Examining effects on hiring discrimination against Arab applicants in field and lab setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 544–570.Google Scholar
Dow Jones Institutional News (2018, May 8). Glassdoor to be acquired by recruit holdings for $1.2 billion. New York, NY: Dow Jones & Company Inc.Google Scholar
Ehrlinger, J., Mitchum, A. L., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Understanding overconfidence: Theories of intelligence, preferential attention, and distorted self-assessment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 94–100.Google Scholar
Evans, A. (2015). Private sector partnerships for sustainable development. In Development co-operation report 2015: Making partnerships effective coalitions for action (pp. 59–65). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Eweje, G., & Bathurst, R. J. (2017). Introduction: Leading for corporate social responsibility and sustainability. In Eweje, G. & Bathurst, R. J. (Eds.), CSR, sustainability, and leadership. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.Google Scholar
Glösenberg, A., Carr, S. C., & Foster, L. L. (in press). A psychological lens on evaluating the social impact of corporate social responsibility. In A. McWilliams, Rupp, D. E., Siegel, D. S., Stahl, G. K., & Waldman, D. A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility.Google Scholar
Gloss, A. E., & Foster Thompson, L. (2013). I-O psychology without borders: The emergence of humanitarian work psychology. In Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Bryan, L. K., & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.), Using I-O psychology for the greater good: Helping those who help others (pp. 353–393). New York, NY: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
GOLDEN (Global Organizational Learning and Development Network) (2015, November 12). GOLDEN for sustainability: An introduction. Retrieved from www.slideshare.net/secret/qSADoWKfaBKdotGoogle Scholar
GOLDEN (2018, April 6). MOOC on corporate sustainability launched with Bocconi. Retrieved from http://goldenforsustainability.com/golden-events/4229/Google Scholar
Goldstein, N. T., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Z. (2018, August 1). Overlooked no more: Clara Lemlich Shavelson, crusading leader of labor rights. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/08/01/obituaries/overlooked-clara-lemlich-shavelson.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gregory, N. (2016). De-risking impact investing. World Economics, 17, 143–158.Google Scholar
Harris, A. (2017, March 17). Lemonade is using behavioral science to onboard customers and keep them honest. Fast Company. Retrieved from www.fastcompany.com/3068506/lemonade-is-using-behavioral-science-to-onboard-customers-and-keep-them-honestGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. (2012). How Congress could reduce job discrimination by promoting anonymous hiring. Stanford Law Review, 64, 1343–1369.Google Scholar
Hawkes, B., Cek, I., & Handler, C. (2018). The gamification of employee selection tools: An exploration of viability, utility, and future directions. In Scott, J. C., Bartram, D., & Reynolds, D. H. (Eds.), Next generation technology-enhanced assessment: Global perspectives on occupational and workplace testing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrero, C., Martínez, R., & Villar, A. (2018). Population structure and the human development index. Social Indicators Research, 1–33. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205–018-1852-0Google Scholar
Hire education (2018, March 31). AI is changing the way firms screen, hire and manage their talent. The Economist, 426(9085), 7S–9S.Google Scholar
IDS (Institute of Development Studies) (2017). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved from www.ids.ac.uk/idsresearch/sustainable-development-goalsGoogle Scholar
Isaacson, W. (2017). Leonardo da Vinci. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Jack, L. (2015, October 2). Why Unilever is betting big on sustainability. Fast Company. Retrieved from www.fastcompany.com/3051498/why-unilever-is-betting-big-on-sustainabilityGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. A., & Rupp, D. E. (2018). Social responsibility in and of organizations: The psychology of corporate social responsibility among organizational members. In Ones, D. S., Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C., & Sinangil, H. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology (pp. 333–348). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, 36–41.Google Scholar
Kerr, S. (1995). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 7–14.Google Scholar
Khanna, P. (2016, March/April). Rise of the Titans. Foreign Policy, 217, 50–55.Google Scholar
Kinjerski, V., & Skrypnek, B. J. (2008). Four paths to spirit at work: Journeys of personal meaning, fulfillment, well-being, and transcendence through work. The Career Development Quarterly, 56, 319–329.Google Scholar
Kraut, A. (2006). Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, technologies and applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kumi, E., Arhin, A. A., & Yeboah, T. (2014). Can post-2015 sustainable development goals survive neoliberalism? A critical examination of the sustainable development–neoliberalism nexus in developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16, 539–554.Google Scholar
Lemonade (2018). The secret behind Lemonade’s claims. Retrieved from www.lemonade.com/claimsGoogle Scholar
Madeira Global (2018). Madeira Global: What we do. Retrieved from www.madeira-global.com/what-we-do.Google Scholar
Madrian, B. C. (2014). Applying insights from behavioral economics to policy design. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 663–688.Google Scholar
Mallory, D., Rupp, D. E., Scott, J. C., Saari, L., Foster Thompson, L., Osicki, M., & Sall, E. (2015). Attention all I-O programs: It’s time to join the United Nations Global Compact. The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 52(4), 135–136.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. Soundings, 49, 131–142.Google Scholar
Modern Species (2018a). We help brands evolve. Retrieved from https://modernspecies.com/Google Scholar
Modern Species (2018b). Ethos: The new world of business. Retrieved from https://modernspecies.com/ethos.Google Scholar
Moura-Leite, R. C., & Padgett, R. C. (2011). Historical background of corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal, 7, 528–539.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation (2016). Intentional defaults for more sustainable infrastructure: Studying interventions to alleviate biases in upstream, multi-stakeholder decisions. Award Abstract #1531041. Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1531041Google Scholar
O’Keefe, P. A., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2018). Implicit theories of interest: Finding your passion or developing it? Psychological Science, 29(10), 1653–1664.Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Wiernik, B. M., & Klein, R. M. (2018). Environmental sustainability at work. In Ones, D. S., Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C., & Sinangil, H. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology (pp. 351–373). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Opoku-Dakwa, A., Chen, C. C., & Rupp, D. E. (2018). CSR initiative characteristics and employee engagement: An impact-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 580–593.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2017). Behavioural insights and public policy: Lessons from around the world. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. B. (2011). Executive coaching: A critical review and recommendations for advancing the practice. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, volume 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. 527–566). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, C., & Armstrong, T. (2006). Current recruitment and selection practices: A national survey of Fortune 1000 firms. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 489–496.Google Scholar
pymetrics (2018). Matching talent to opportunity, bias free. Retrieved from www.pymetrics.com/employers/Google Scholar
Roose, K. (2017, December 28). Tech also did some good things in 2017. New York Times, p. B1.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Skarlicki, D. P., Paddock, E. L., Kim, T., & Nadisic, T. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 559–579.Google Scholar
Ryan, K. J. (2017, June 13). An insurance company that homeowners actually might love. Inc. Retrieved from www.inc.com/kevin-j-ryan/insurance-startup-lemonade-california-90-percent-of-americans.htmlGoogle Scholar
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiro, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217–1227.Google Scholar
SBST (2015). Social and Behavioral Science Team Annual Report. National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President, Washington DC. Retrieved from https://sbst.gov/download/2015%20SBST%20Annual%20Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.Google Scholar
Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The private sector and the SDGs: The need to move beyond “business as usual.” Sustainable Development, 24, 371–382.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C., Bartram, D., & Reynolds, D. H. (Eds.) (2018). Next generation technology-enhanced assessment: Global perspectives on occupational and workplace testing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shankar, M. U., & Foster, L. L. (2016). Behavioural insights at the United Nations: Achieving agenda 2030. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/development-impact/behavioural-insights-at-the-united-nations-achieving-agenda-203/Google Scholar
Sharafat, A. R., & Lehr, W. H. (2017). ICT4SDGs: ICT-centric economic growth, innovation and job creation. International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved from www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/gen/D-GEN-ICT_SDGS.01-2017-PDF-E.pdfGoogle Scholar
Simon, J., & Barmeier, J. (2010). More than money: Impact investing for development. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
SIOP (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Retrieved from www.siop.org/_principles/principles.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stahel, W. R. (2016). Circular economy. Nature, 531, 435–438.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudging: A very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 583–588.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., & Reisch, L. A. (2014). Automatically green: Behavioral economics and environmental protection. Harvard Law Review, 38, 127–158.Google Scholar
Swanson, D. L., & Orlitzky, M. (2018). Leading the triple bottom line: A corporate social responsibility approach. In Ones, D. S., Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C., & Sinangil, H. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology (pp. 313–330). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
UNICEF (2017, October 12). UNICEF and private sector companies in Jordan discuss youth empowerment strategies for employment. Retrieved from www.unicef.org/jordan/media_12273.htmlGoogle Scholar
Unilever (2018a). Sustainable living. Retrieved from www.unilever.co.uk/sustainable-living/Google Scholar
Unilever (2018b). Fairness in the workplace. Retrieved from www.unilever.co.uk/sustainable-living/the-unilever-sustainable-living-plan/fairness-in-the-workplace/Google Scholar
Unilever (2018c). Independent assurance. Retrieved from www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/our-approach-to-reporting/independent-assurance/Google Scholar
Unilever (2018d). Opportunities for women. Retrieved from www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/enhancing-livelihoods/opportunities-for-women/enhancing-womens-access-to-training-skills/Google Scholar
United Nations (2014). The road to dignity by 2030: Ending poverty, transforming all lives and protecting the planet. Synthesis Report of the Secretary-General on the Post-2015 Agenda. Retrieved from www.un.org/disabilities/documents/reports/SG_Synthesis_Report_Road_to_Dignity_by_2030.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations (2018). World economic situation and prospects 2018. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/WESP2018_Full_Web-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2018). Sustainable development knowledge platform. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/sustainabledevelopmentgoalsGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (2017a). Istanbul International Center for the Private Sector in Development (IICPSD): Progress report. Retrieved from www.iicpsd.undp.org/content/dam/istanbul/IICPSD/UNDP%20IICPSD%20Progress%20Report%202017.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (2017b). Istanbul International Center for the Private Sector in Development: Inclusive business overview. Retrieved from www.iicpsd.undp.org/content/istanbul/en/home/our-work/inclusive-business-models/overview.htmlGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (2017c). Istanbul International Center for the Private Sector in Development: Skills development overview. Retrieved from www.iicpsd.undp.org/content/istanbul/en/home/our-work/private-sector-role-skills-development/overview.htmlGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (2017d). Istanbul International Center for the Private Sector in Development: Impact investment overview. Retrieved from www.iicpsd.undp.org/content/istanbul/en/home/our-work/impact-investment/overview.htmlGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (2017e). Istanbul International Center for the Private Sector in Development: Resilience and crisis response overview. Retrieved from www.iicpsd.undp.org/content/istanbul/en/home/our-work/resilience-and-crisis-response/overview.htmlGoogle Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (2018, March 20). Secretariat update on sustainable consumption and production. Retrieved from https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/25178/Sustainable%20consumption%20and%20production%20-%20Update.pdf?sequence=26&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/RES/70/1. Retrieved from www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=EGoogle Scholar
United Nations Global Compact (2018a). What’s the commitment? Retrieved from www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/join/commitmentGoogle Scholar
United Nations Global Compact (2018b). The ten principles of the UN Global Compact. Retrieved from www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principlesGoogle Scholar
United Nations Global Compact (2018c). How the UN Global Compact helps. Retrieved from www.unglobalcompact.org/sdgs/aboutGoogle Scholar
United Nations Global Compact and KPMG (2015). SDG industry matrix: Transportation. Retrieved from www.unglobalcompact.org/library/3111Google Scholar
van der Starre, R. E., Coffeng, J. K., Hendriksen, I. J. M., van Mechelen, W., & Boot, C. R. L. (2013). Associations between overweight, obesity, health measures and need for recovery in office employees: A cross-sectional analysis. BMC Public Health, 13, 1207–1214.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.Google Scholar
Verma, P., & Sinha, N. (2016). Technology acceptance model revisited for mobile based agriculture extension services in India. Management Research and Practice, 8(4), 29–38.Google Scholar
Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D., & Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1703–1725.Google Scholar
Wildman, J. L., Bedwell, W. L., Salsa, E., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2011). Performance measurement at work: A multilevel perspective. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, volume 1: Building and developing the organization (pp. 303–341). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
World Bank Group (2018). World Bank data: GDP. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.mktp.cdGoogle Scholar
Zedeck, S. (Ed.). (2011). APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, volume 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×