Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
Part III - Methodological Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface , pp. 139 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). Meta-analysis of work–family conflict mean differences: Does national context matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 90–100.Google Scholar
Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 151–169.Google Scholar
Andres, M., Moelker, R., & Soeters, J. (2012). A longitudinal study of partners of deployed personnel from the Netherlands’ armed forces. Military Psychology, 24, 270.Google Scholar
Aryee, S., Fields, D., & Luk, V. (1999). A cross-cultural test of a model of the work–family interface. Journal of Management, 25, 491–511.Google Scholar
Baral, R., & Bhargava, S. (2011). Predictors of work-family enrichment: Moderating effect of core self-evaluations. Journal of Indian Business Research, 3, 220–243.Google Scholar
Barnes-Farrell, J. L., Davies-Schrils, K., McGonagle, A., Walsh, B., Di Milia, L., Fischer, F. M., … & Tepas, D. (2008). What aspects of shiftwork influence off-shift well-being of healthcare workers? Applied Ergonomics, 39, 589–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouchard, G., & Poirier, L. (2011). Neuroticism and well-being among employed new parents: The role of the work–family conflict. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 657–661.Google Scholar
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caligiuri, P. M., Hyland, M. M., Joshi, A., & Bross, A. S. (1998). Testing a theoretical model for examining the relationship between family adjustment and expatriates’ work adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 598–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276.Google Scholar
Casper, W. J., Eby, L. T., Bordeaux, C., Lockwood, A., & Lambert, D. (2007). A review of research methods in IO/OB work–family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 28–43.Google Scholar
Casper, W. J., De Hauw, S., & Wayne, J. H. (2013). Concepts and measures in the work–family interface: Implications for work–family integration. In Major, D. A. & Burke, R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Work–Life Integration Among Professionals: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 35–57). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: a meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57–80.Google Scholar
Gallie, D., & Russell, H. (2009). Work–family conflict and working conditions in Western Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93, 445–467.Google Scholar
Grzywacz, J. G., Quandt, S. A., Arcury, T. A., & Marín, A. (2005). The work–family challenge and mental health: Experiences of Mexican immigrants. Community, Work and Family, 8, 271–279.Google Scholar
Grzywacz, J. G., Arcury, T. A., Marín, A., Carrillo, L., Burke, B., Coates, M. L., & Quandt, S. A. (2007). Work–family conflict: Experiences and health implications among immigrant Latinos. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1119–1130.Google Scholar
Haar, J. M., Roche, M., & Taylor, D. (2012). Work–family conflict and turnover intentions of indigenous employees: The importance of the whanau/family for Maori. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 2546–2560.Google Scholar
Hill, E. J., Erickson, J. J., Fellows, K. J., Martinengo, G., & Allen, S. M. (2014). Work and family over the life course: Do older workers differ? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35, 1–13.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. London, UK: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Innstrand, S. I., Langballe, E. M., Espnes, G. A., Falkum, E., & Aasland, O. G. (2008). Positive and negative work–family interaction and burnout: A longitudinal study of reciprocal relations. Work & Stress, 22, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joplin, J. R., Shaffer, M. A., Francesco, A. M., & Lau, T. (2003). The macro-environment and work–family conflict development of a cross cultural comparative framework. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3, 305–328.Google Scholar
Kasearu, K. (2009). The effect of union type on work–life conflict in five European countries. Social Indicators Research, 93, 549–567.Google Scholar
Lallukka, T., Chandola, T., Roos, E., Cable, N., Sekine, M., Kagamimori, S., … & Lahelma, E. (2010). Work–family conflicts and health behaviors among British, Finnish, and Japanese employees. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 134–142.Google Scholar
Lapierre, L. M., & McMullan, A. D. (2016). A review of methodological and measurement approaches to the study of work and family. In Allen, T. D. & Eby, L. T. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work And Family (pp. 36–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, R., Verma, S., & Dworkin, J. (2001). Men’s work and family lives in India: The daily organization of time and emotion. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 206–224.Google Scholar
Leiter, M. P., & Durup, M. J. (1996). Work, home, and in-between: A longitudinal study of spillover. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 29–47.Google Scholar
Lu, L. (2011). A Chinese longitudinal study on work/family enrichment. Career Development International, 16, 385–400.Google Scholar
Malinen, S., & Johnston, L. (2011). Seeking a better work–life balance: Expectations and perceptions of work-related practices and attitudes of recent immigrants to New Zealand. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 20, 233–252.Google Scholar
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 234–250.Google Scholar
Mauno, S. (2010). Effects of work–family culture on employee well-being: Exploring moderator effects in a longitudinal sample. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 675–695.Google Scholar
Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111–130.Google Scholar
Mohammada, M. (2007). The Foundations of the Composite Culture in India. Delhi: Aakar Books.Google Scholar
Namasivayam, K., & Zhao, X. (2007). An investigation of the moderating effects of organizational commitment on the relationships between work–family conflict and job satisfaction among hospitality employees in India. Tourism Management, 28, 1212–1223.Google Scholar
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400–410.Google Scholar
Ng, C. W., Fosh, P., & Naylor, D. (2002). Work–family conflict for employees in an East Asian airline: impact on career and relationship to gender. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 23, 67–105.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, M. P., Poelmans, S., Spector, P. E., Kalliath, T., Allen, T. D., Cooper, C. L., & Sanchez, J. I. (2003). Family-responsive interventions, perceived organizational and supervisor support, work–family conflict, and psychological strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 10, 326–344.Google Scholar
Öun, I. (2012). Work–family conflict in the Nordic countries: A comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 165–184.Google Scholar
Poster, W. R., & Prasad, S. (2005). Work–family relations in transnational perspective: A view from high-tech firms in India and the United States. Social Problems, 52, 122–146.Google Scholar
Riordan, C. M., & Vandenberg, R. J. (1994). A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in an equivalent manner? Journal of Management, 20, 643–671.Google Scholar
Shaffer, M. A., Harrison, D. A., Gilley, K. M., & Luk, D. M. (2001). Struggling for balance amid turbulence on international assignments: Work–family conflict, support and commitment. Journal of Management, 27, 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharabi, M. (2010). Ethnicity, ethnic conflict and work values: the case of Jews and Arabs in Israel. Journal of Peace, Conflict and Development, 15, 60–73.Google Scholar
Shih, H. A., Chiang, Y. H., & Hsu, C. C. (2010). High involvement work system, work–family conflict, and expatriate performance–examining Taiwanese expatriates in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 2013–2030.Google Scholar
Shockley, K.M., Douek, J., Smith, C.R., Yu, P.P., Dumani, S., & French, K.A. (2017). Cross-cultural work and family research: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 101, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockley, K.M., Shen, W., Denunzio, M., Arvan, M., & Knudsen, E. (2014). Clarifying gender and work–family conflict: A meta-analytic approach. In Mills, M.J. (Chair) Work–life Interface Meets Employee Gender: Challenge and Opportunity. Symposium presented at the Work Family Researchers Network conference. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Poelmans, S., Allen, T. D., O’Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. I., … & Lu, L. (2004). A cross‐national comparative study of work‐family stressors, working hours, and well‐being: China and Latin America versus the Anglo world. Personnel Psychology, 57, 119–142.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Liu, C., & Sanchez, J. I. (2015). Methodological and substantive issues in conducting multinational and cross-cultural research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 101–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Zee, K. I., Ali, A. J., & Salomé, E. (2005). Role interference and subjective well-being among expatriate families. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 239–262.Google Scholar
Wang, P., Lawler, J. J., & Shi, K. (2011). Implementing family‐friendly employment practices in banking industry: Evidences from some African and Asian countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman, M., Etzion, D., & Gattenio, E. (2008). International business travels and the work‐family interface: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 459–480.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. G., Polzer-Debruyne, A., Chen, S., & Fernandes, S. (2007). Shift work interventions for reduced work–family conflict. Employee Relations, 29, 162–177.Google Scholar
References
Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 306–331.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D. (2012). The work–family interface. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Ed). The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology (pp. 1163–1198). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2014). Work–family conflict among members of full-time dual-earner couples: An examination of family life stage, gender, and age. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 376–384.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). Meta-analysis of work–family conflict mean differences: Does national context matter?. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 90–100.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66, 345–376.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Saboe, K. N., Cho, E., Dumani, S., & Evans, S. (2012). Dispositional variables and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. D., Shockley, K. M., & Biga, A. (2010). Work and family in a global context. In Lundby, K. (Ed). Going Global: Practical Applications and Recommendations for HR and OD Professionals in the Global Workplace (pp. 377–401). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 151–169.Google Scholar
Aytug, Z. G., Rothstein, H. R., Zhou, W., & Kern, M. C. (2012). Revealed or concealed? Transparency of procedures, decisions, and judgment calls in meta-analyses. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 103–133.Google Scholar
Beins, B. C. (2011). Methodological and conceptual issues in cross-cultural research. In Keith, K. D. (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Psychology (37–55). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Butts, M. M., Casper, W. J., & Yang, T. S. (2013). How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 1–25.Google Scholar
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.Google Scholar
Casper, W. J., Allen, T. D., & Poelmans, S. A. (2014). International perspectives on work and family: An introduction to the special section. Applied Psychology, 63(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
Cho, E., & Ciancetta, L. (2016). Child outcomes associated with parent work–family experiences. In Allen, T.D. & Eby, L. T. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work And Family (pp. 151–164). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work‐family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1344–1361.Google Scholar
Dahm, P. C., Glomb, T. M., Manchester, C. F., & Leroy, S. (2015). Work–family conflict and self-discrepant time allocation at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 767–792.Google Scholar
DeGeest, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (2011). The impact of research synthesis methods on industrial–organizational psychology: The road from pessimism to optimism about cumulative knowledge. Research synthesis methods, 1(3‐4), 185–197.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, E. S., & Hox, J. J. (2003). The use of meta-analysis in cross-national studies. In Harkness, J. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Mohler, P. P. (Eds). Cross-Cultural Survey Methods (pp. 329–345). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 124–197.Google Scholar
Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57–80.Google Scholar
French, K. A., Dumani, S., Allen, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of Support Across Cultures. Poster presentation for the 2015 Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Glass, G. V. (2015). Meta-analysis at middle age: A personal history. Research Synthesis Methods, 6, 221–231.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10, 15–41.Google Scholar
Hoobler, J. M., Hu, J., & Wilson, M. (2010). Do workers who experience conflict between the work and family domains hit a “glass ceiling?”: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 481–494.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage publications.Google Scholar
Kossek, E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 139–149.Google Scholar
Kossek, E., & Ozeki, C. (1999). Bridging the work–family policy and productivity gap: a literature review. Community, Work, & Family, 2, 7–32.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta‐analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family‐specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64, 289–313.Google Scholar
Lallukka, T., Chandola, T., Roos, E., Cable, N., Sekine, M., Kagamimori, S., Tatsuse, T., Marmot, M., & Lahelma, E. (2010). Work–family conflicts and health behaviors among British, Finnish, and Japanese employees. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 134–142.Google Scholar
Lenartowicz, T., Johnson, J. P., & White, C. T. (2003). The neglect of intracountry cultural variation in international management research. Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 999–1008.Google Scholar
Litano, M. L., Major, D. A., Landers, R. N., Streets, V. N., & Bass, B. I. (2016). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work–family experiences. The Leadership Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.06.003Google Scholar
Matthews, R. A., Winkel, D. E., & Wayne, J. H. (2014). A longitudinal examination of role overload and work–family conflict: The mediating role of interdomain transitions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 72–91.Google Scholar
McNall, L. A., Nicklin, J. M., & Masuda, A. D. (2010). A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work–family enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 381–396.Google Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 215–232.Google Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2006). How family-friendly work environments affect work/family conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Labor Research, 27, 555–574.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Jackson, T. A., McInnis, K. J., Maltin, E. R., & Sheppard, L. (2012). Affective, normative, and continuance commitment levels across cultures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 225–245.Google Scholar
Michel, J. S., Clark, M. A., & Jaramillo, D. (2011). The role of the Five Factor Model of personality in the perceptions of negative and positive forms of work–nonwork spillover: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J. S., & Hargis, M. B. (2008). Linking mechanisms of work–family conflict and segmentation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 509–522.Google Scholar
Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2010). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta‐analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 689–725.Google Scholar
Michel, J. S., Mitchelson, J. K., Kotrba, L. M., LeBreton, J. M., & Baltes, B. B. (2009). A comparative test of work–family conflict models and critical examination of work–family linkages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 199–218.Google Scholar
Michel, J. S., Mitchelson, J. K., Pichler, S., & Cullen, K. L. (2010). Clarifying relationships among work and family social support, stressors, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 91–104.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264–269.Google Scholar
Nohe, C., Meier, L. L., Sonntag, K., & Michel, A. (2015). The chicken or the egg? A meta-analysis of panel studies of the relationship between work–family conflict and strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 522–536.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, K. (2007). An historical perspective on meta-analysis: Dealing quantitatively with varying study results. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100, 579–582.Google Scholar
Olivas-Luján, M. R., Harzing, A. W., & McCoy, S. (2004). September 11, 2001: Two quasi-experiments on the influence of threats on cultural values and cosmopolitanism. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4, 211–228.Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Foucreault, A. (2016). Cross-national work–life research: Cultural and structural impacts for individuals and organizations. Journal of Management, 43(1), 111–136.Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A., Valcour, M., Den Dulk, L., & Kossek, E. E. (2013). Theorizing national context to develop comparative work–life research: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 31, 433–447.Google Scholar
Powell, G. N., Francesco, A. M., & Ling, Y. (2009). Toward culture‐sensitive theories of the work–family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 597–616.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R. (2015). Introduction to the special issue on the origins of modern meta-analysis. Research SynthesGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, B. S., & Riordan, C. M. (2003). A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 169–215.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L. (2015). History and development of the Schmidt-Hunter meta-analysis methods. Research Synthesis Methods, 6, 232–239.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias In Research Findings. Sage publications.Google Scholar
Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2013). Episodic work–family conflict, cardiovascular indicators, and social support: An experience sampling approach. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 262–275.Google Scholar
Shockley, K.M., Douek, J., Smith, C.R., Yu, P.P., Dumani, S., & French, K.A. (2017). Cross-cultural work and family research: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 101, 1–20.Google Scholar
Shockley, K. M., & Singla, N. (2011). Reconsidering work–family interactions and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37, 861–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S. A., Lapierre, L. M., Cooper, C. L., Michael, O. D., … & Brough, P. (2007). Cross‐national differences in relationships of work demands, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions with work–family conflict. Personnel Psychology, 60, 805–835.Google Scholar
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 405–439.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in International Business. Irwin, Chicago.Google Scholar
Van Den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003). Multilevel meta-analysis: A comparison with traditional meta-analytical procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5), 765–790.Google Scholar
Yang, N., Chen, C. C., Choi, J., & Zou, Y. (2000). Sources of work‐family conflict: a Sino‐US comparison of the effects of work and family demands. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 113–123.Google Scholar
References
Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). Meta-analysis of work–family conflict mean differences: Does national context matter? Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 90, 90–100.Google Scholar
Ambert, A. M., Adler, P. A., Adler, P., & Detzner, D. F. (1995). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 879–893.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31, 597–606.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491.Google Scholar
Ba’, S. (2011). Symbolic boundaries: Integration and separation of work and family life. Community, Work & Family, 14, 317–334.Google Scholar
Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. National Centre for Research Methods, Southampton, the U.K. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/Google Scholar
Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115–1117.Google Scholar
Beigi, M., & Shirmohammadi, M. (2017). Qualitative research on work–family in the management field: a review. Applied Psychology: An International Review, doi:10.1111/apps.12093Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-Cultural Research Methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brough, P., O’Driscoll, M.P., Biggs, A. (2009). Parental leave and work–family balance among employed parents following childbirth: An exploratory investigation in Australia and New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 4, 71–87.Google Scholar
Burgess, J., Henderson, L., & Strachan, G. (2007). ‘I just juggle’: Work and family balance in Australian organisations. Hecate, 33(1), 94.Google Scholar
Chan, K. B. (2002). Coping with work stress, work satisfaction, and social support: An interpretive study of life insurance agents. Asian Journal of Social Science, 30(3), 657.Google Scholar
Coffey, B. S., Anderson, S. E., Shuming, Z., Yongqiang, L., & Jiyuan, Z. (2009). Perspectives on work–family issues in China: the voices of young urban professionals. Community, Work & Family, 12(2), 197–212. doi:10.1080/13668800902778967Google Scholar
Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support as a determinant of marital quality: The interplay of negative and supportive behaviours. In Pierce, G. R., Sarason, B. R., & Sarason, I. G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Support And The Family (pp. 173–194). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
De Cieri, H., & Bardoel, E. A. (2009). What does “work–life management” mean in China and Southeast Asia for MNCs? Community, Work & Family, 12, 179–196.Google Scholar
Frisby, C. L. (1998). Culture and cultural differences. In Sandoval, J. H., Frisby, C. L., Geisinger, K. F., Scheuneman, J. D., & Grenier, J. R. (Eds.), Test Interpretation and Diversity: Achieving Equity in Assessment (pp. 51–73). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Fugard, A. J. B., & Potts, H. W. W. (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analysis: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 669–684.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. (2006). Families and family change. In Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Kagitçibasi, Ç., & Poortinga, Y. H., (Eds.), Families Across Cultures: A 30-Nation Psychological Study (pp. 3–50). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, J. L., Hamby, B. A., & Dennis, W. D. (1997). Researching gender role ideologies internationally and cross-culturally. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 151–170.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies For Qualitative Research. London, U.K.: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Allen, K. R. (2015). Communicating qualitative research: Some practical guideposts for scholars. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 3–22.Google Scholar
Green, B. (2004). Personal construct psychology and content analysis. Personal Construct Theory and Practice, 1, 82–91.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.Google Scholar
Grzywacz, J. G., Arcury, T. A., Marín, A., Carrillo, L., Burke, B., Coates, M. L., & Quandt, S. A. (2007). Work–family conflict: Experiences and health implications among immigrant Latinos. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1119–1130.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (2000). Key concepts: Underlying structures of culture. In Lane, H. W., DiStefano, J. J., & Maznevski, M. L. (Eds.), International Management Behavior: Test, Readings, and Cases (pp. 199–206). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. J., Asmaro, D., Suedfeld, P., & Gushin, V. (2012). Thematic content analysis of work–family interactions: Retired cosmonauts’ reflections. Acta Astronautica, 81, 306–317.Google Scholar
Joplin, J. R. W., Francesco, A. M., Shaffer, M. A., & Lau, T. (2003). The macro-environment and work–family conflict: Development of a cross-cultural comparative framework. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 3, 305–328.Google Scholar
Kasper, H., Meyer, M., & Schmidt, A. (2005). Managers dealing with work‐family‐conflict: an explorative analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, (20) 5, 440–461.Google Scholar
King, N. (1998). Template analysis. In Symon, G. & Cassell, C. (Eds.), Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research (pp. 118–134). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, J., & Tootell, B. (2008). Is entrepreneurship the answer to achieving work–family balance? Journal of Management & Organization, 14(3), 285–302.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lewis, S., Gambles, R., & Rapoport, R. (2007). The constraints of a ‘work–life balance’ approach: An international perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 360–373.Google Scholar
Löckenhoff, C. E., Lee, D. S., Buckner, K. M. L., Moreira, R. O., Martinez, S. J., & Sun, M. Q. (2015). Cross-Cultural Differences in Attitudes About Aging: Moving Beyond the East-West Dichotomy. In Cheng, S.-T., Chi, I., Fung, H. H., Li, L. W., & Woo, J. (Eds.), Successful Aging: Asian Perspectives (pp. 321–337). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Lu, Q., Huang, X., & Bond, M. H. (2016). Culture and the working life: Predicting the relative centrality of work across life domains for employed persons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 277–293.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2017). Culture and Psychology (6th ed). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London, U.K.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mitteness, L., & Barker, J. (2004). Collaborative and team research. In Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., & Silverman, D. (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice. London, the U.K.: Sage.Google Scholar
Mojtaba, V., Turnnen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. (2017). Using conceptual depth criteria: Addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 17 (5), 554–570.Google Scholar
Ng, C. W., Fosh, P., & Naylor, D. (2002). Work–family conflict for employees in an East Asian airline: Impact on career and relationship to gender. Economic & Industrial Democracy, 23(1), 67–15.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., & McDowall, A. (2012). When work keeps us apart: A thematic analysis of the experience of business travellers. Community, Work & Family, 15, 335–355.Google Scholar
Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing and Health, 31, 391–398.Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Foucreault, A. (2017). Cross-national work–life research: Cultural and structural impacts for individuals and organizations. Journal of Management, 43, 111–136.Google Scholar
Peus, C., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2008). Manager and mommy? A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(5), 558–575.Google Scholar
Poelmans, S. A. Y., Greenhaus, J. H., & Maestro, M. L. H. (2013). Expanding the Boundaries Of work–Family Research: A Vision for The Future. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Poster, W. R., & Prasad, S. (2005). Work–family relations in transnational perspective: a view from high-tech firms in India and the United States. Social Problems, 52(1), 122–146.Google Scholar
Rohner, R. P. (1984). Toward a conception of culture for cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(2), 111–138.Google Scholar
Rothbard, N. P., Phillips, K. W., & Dumas, T. L. (2005). Managing multiple roles: Work–family policies and individuals’ desire for segmentation. Organizational Science, 16, 243–258.Google Scholar
Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., & Silverman, D. (Eds.). (2004). Qualitative Research Practice. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Shordike, A., Hocking, C., Pierce, D., Wright-St. Clair, V., Vitayakorn, S., Rattakorn, P., & Bunrayong, W. (2010). Respecting regional culture in an international multi-sight study: A derived etic method. Qualitative Research, 10, 333–335.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Fischer, F., Vignoles, V. L., & Bond, M. H. (2013). Understanding Social Psychology across Cultures: Engaging with Others in a Changing World (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2007). Strategies for coping with work–family conflict: The distinctive relationships of gender role ideology. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(1), 1–19. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.1Google Scholar
Sturges, J. E., & Hanrahan, K. J. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4, 107–118.Google Scholar
Thein, H. H., Austen, S., Currie, J., & Lewin, E. (2010). The impact of cultural context on the perception of work/family balance by professional women in Singapore and Hong Kong. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 10, 303–320.Google Scholar
Valk, R., & Srinivasan, V. (2011). Work–family balance of Indian women software professionals: A qualitative study. IIMB Management Review, 23, 39–50.Google Scholar
Wong, O. M. H. (2003). Postponement or abandonment of marriage? Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34, 531–554.Google Scholar
Wong, S., & Goodwin, R. (2009). The impact of work on marriage in three cultures: A qualitative study. Community, Work & Family, 12, 213–232.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, T. S., Haddock, S. A., Current, L. R., & Ziemba, S. (2003). Intimate partnership: Foundation to the successful balance of family and work. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 107–124.Google Scholar
References
Abraham, K.G., Maitland, A., & Bianchi, S.M. (2006). Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey: Who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 676–703.Google Scholar
Andorka, R. (1987). Time budgets and their uses. Annual Review of Sociology 13:149–164.Google Scholar
Bevans, G. E. (1913). How Workingmen Spend Their Spare Time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M.A., Sayer, L.C., & Robinson, J.P. (2000). Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor. Social Forces, 79 (September), 191–228.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S.M., Robinson, J.P., & Milkie, M.A. (2006). Changing the Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bonke, J. (2005). Paid Work and unpaid work: diary information versus questionnaire information. Social Indicators Research 70:349–368.Google Scholar
Bridgman, B, Dugan, A., Lal, M., Osborne, M., & Villones, S. (2012). Accounting for Household Production in the National Accounts, 1965–2010. Survey of Current Business 92(5):23–36.Google Scholar
Charmes, J. (2015). Time Use Across the World: Findings of a World Compilation of Time Use Surveys. 2015 UNDP Human Development Report Office.Google Scholar
Chenu, A., & Lesnard, L. (2006). Time use surveys: a review of their Aims, methods and results. European Journal of Sociology, vol. 3(47), pp. 335–359.Google Scholar
Converse, P.E. (1968). Time budgets. In Sills, David (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan, pp. 42–47.Google Scholar
Davis, G.C., & You, W. (2011). Not enough money or not enough time to satisfy the Thrifty Food Plan? A cost difference approach for estimating a money-time threshold. Food Policy 36(2):101–107.Google Scholar
Durán, M.A. (2010). Tiempo de vida y tiempo de trabajo. Conferencias Magistrales: Fundación BBVA: Bilbao.Google Scholar
Durán, M. Á. & Rogero-García, J. (2009). La investigación sobre el uso del tiempo. Cuadernos Metodológicos, Vol. 44. Madrid: CIS, p. 214.Google Scholar
Fisher, K. (2015). Metadata of Time Use Studies. Last updated 31 December 2014. Centre for Time Use Research, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. www.timeuse.org/information/studies/Google Scholar
Frazis, H., & Stewart, J. (2004). What Can Time Diary Data Tell Us About Hours of Work? Monthly Labor Review, 127(December), 3–9.Google Scholar
García Román, J., Flood, S., & Genadek, K. (2017). Parents’ time with a partner in cross-national context: A comparison of the US, Spain, and France. Demographic Research, 36 (4): 111–144.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing Times: Work and Leisure In Post-Industrial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J., & Harms, T. (2016). Housework Now Takes Much Less Time: 85 Years of us Rural Women’s Time Use. Social Forces 1–22.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (1998). The sociological uses of time-use diary analysis.”European Sociological Review 14(1):69–85.Google Scholar
Gracia, P., & Kalmijn, M. (2016). Parents’ family time and work schedules: The splitshift schedule in Spain. Journal of Marriage and Family 78(2): 401–415. doi:10.1111/jomf.12270.Google Scholar
Harvey, A. S., & Pentland, W. E. (1999). Time use research, in Pentland, W. E. et al. (Eds.), Time Use Research in The Social Sciences, New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group. p. 3–18.Google Scholar
Hofferth, S.L. (1999). Family Reading to Young Children: Social Desirability and Cultural Biases in Reporting. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Measurement of and Research on Time Use, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council, Washington, DC, May 27–28.Google Scholar
Hofferth, S. L. (2006). Response bias in a popular indicator of reading to children. Sociological Methodology, 36: 301–315.Google Scholar
Juster, F.T., & Stafford, F.P. (1991). The Allocation of Time: Empirical Findings, Behavioral Models, and Problems of Measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 29 (June), 471–522.Google Scholar
Juster, F. T., Ono, H., & Stafford, F. P. (2003). An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology, 33: 19–54.Google Scholar
Kneeland, H. (1929). Woman’s economic contribution in the home. In Special issue: Women in the Modern World. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 143:33–40.Google Scholar
Marini, M.M., & Shelton, B.A. (1993). Measuring household work: recent experience in the United States. Social Science Research, 22: 369–382.Google Scholar
Michelson, W.H. (2015). Time use: Expanding Explanation in the Social Sciences. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2000). Time-Use Measurement and Research: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Mullan, K., & Craig, L. (2009). Harmonising extended measures of parental childcare in the time-diary surveys of four countries – proximity versus responsibility. Electronic International journal of Time Use Research, 6 (1): 48–72.Google Scholar
Press, J.E., & Townsley, E. (1998). Wives’ and husband’s housework reporting. Gender, class, and social desirability. Gender and Society, 12: 188–218Google Scholar
Presser, S., Robinson, J. (2000). Estimating Daily Activity Times: Comparing Three Approaches in Relation to Time Diaries.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
Presser, S., & Stinson, L. (1998). Data Collection Mode and Social Desirability Bias in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure and Source Monitoring. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 137–145.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.P. (1985). “The validity and reliability of diaries versus alterative time use measures.” In Juster, F.T. & Stafford, F.P. (Eds.), Time, Goods and Well-Being. Ann Arbor: University Press of Michigan. pp. 33–62.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. P. (1999). The time diary method. Structure and uses. In Pentland, W. E. et al. (Eds.), Time Use Research in the Social Sciences, New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 47–89.Google Scholar
Robinson, J., & Bostrom, A. (1994). The Overestimated Workweek? What Time Diary Measures Suggest. Monthly Labor Review, 117 (August), 11–23.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2007). Food Stamps, the Thrifty Food Plan, and Meal Preparation: The Importance of the Time Dimension for US Nutrition Policy. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 39(4):226–232.Google Scholar
Sevilla, A. (2014). On the importance of time diary data and introduction to a special issue on time use research. Review of Economics of the Household, 12, 1–6.Google Scholar
Sorokin, P.A., & Berger, C.Q. (1939). Time-budgets of human behaviors. Harvard Sociological Studies 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Strumilin, S.G. (1925). Time-budgets of Russian workers in 1923–1924. Planovoe khozyaistvo, 7.Google Scholar
Szalai, A. (1966). The Multinational Comparative Time Budget Research Project A Venture In International Research Cooperation. American Behavioral Scientist 10 (4): 1–31.Google Scholar
Szalai, A. (1984). The concept of time budget research. In Harvey, A. (Ed.), Time budget research: An ISSC workbook in comparative analysis. New York: Campus. 17–35.Google Scholar
Zuzanek, J. (1980). Work and leisure in the Soviet Union. A time-budget analysis. New York: Holt Saunders Ltd. P. 430.Google Scholar
References
Aycan, Z. (2017). Introducing Project 3535: Lessons learned from a multicultural collaborative research on the work-family interface. In Korabik, K., Aycan, Z., & Ayman, R. (Eds.), The Work-Family Interface in Global Context (pp 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bagger, J., & Love, J. (2010). Methodological considerations in conducting cross-national work-family survey research. In Sweet, S. & Casey, J. (Eds.), Work and Family Encyclopedia. Chestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Work and Family Research Network.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & Stewart, S. M. (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 287–321.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 155–175. doi:10.1177/0022022102250225Google Scholar
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713Google Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.Google Scholar
Cheung, M. W. L., Leung, K., & Au, K. (2006). Evaluating multilevel models in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(5), 522–541.Google Scholar
Cole, M. S., Bedeian, A. G., & Feild, H. S. (2006). The measurement equivalence of web-based and paper-and-pencil measures of transformational leadership: A multinational test. Organizational Research Methods, 9(3), 339–368.Google Scholar
Davidov, E., Dulmer, H., Schluter, E., Schmidt, P., & Meuleman, B. (2012). Using a multilevel structural equation modeling approach to explain cross-cultural measurement noninvariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(4), 558–575. doi:10.1177/0022022112438397Google Scholar
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55–75. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137Google Scholar
De Beuckelaer, A., & Lievens, F. (2009). Measurement equivalence of paper-and-pencil and internet organisational surveys: A large scale examination in 16 countries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(2), 336–361. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00350.xGoogle Scholar
Ekrut, S., Alarcon, O., Coll, C. G., Tropp, L. R., & Garcia, H. A. V. (1999). The dual-focus approach to creating bilingual measures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(2), 206–218.Google Scholar
Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(435–441).Google Scholar
Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 111–126. doi:10.1037//1076-8998.5.1.111Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45(153–171).Google Scholar
Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J.G., Shanine, K.K., & Kacmar, K.M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annuals, 11 (1), 309–341; doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Korabik, K., Aycan, Z., & Ayman, R. (2017). The work–family interface in global context: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 7(4), 361–388. doi:10.1177/1094428104268027Google Scholar
Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 2011–2084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus users guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Foucreault, A. (2016). Cross-national work-life research: Cultural and structural impacts for individuals and organizations. Journal of Management, 1–26. doi:10.1177/0149206316655873Google Scholar
Oreg, S., Bayazit, M., Vakola, M., Arciniega, L., Armenakis, A., Barkauskiene, R.,… van Dam, K. (2008). Dispositional resistance to change: Measurement equivalence and the link to personal values across 17 nations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 935–944. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.935Google Scholar
Powell, G. N., Francesco, A. M., & Ling, A. Y. (2009). Toward culture-sensitive theories of the work-family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 597–616. doi:10.1002/job.568Google Scholar
Raju, N. S., Laffitte, L. J., & Byrne, B. M. (2002). Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 517–529. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.517Google Scholar
Schaffer, B. S., & Riordan, C. M. (2003). A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 169–215. doi:10.1177/1094428103251542Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management, 18, 210–222. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003Google Scholar
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90.Google Scholar
Tay, L., Meade, A.W., & Cao, M. (2015). An overview and practical guide to IRT measurement equivalence analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 3–46.Google Scholar
Trimble, J. E. (2007). Cultural measurement equivalence. In Clauss-Ehlers, C. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural School Psychology. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 139–158.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R., J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R.J., & Morelli, N.A. (2016). A contemporary update for testing for measurement equivalence and invariance. In Meyer, J.P. (Ed.), Handbook of Employee Commitment (pp. 449–461). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
References
Allen, T. D., Lapierre, L. M., Spector, P. E., Poelmans, S. A., O’Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. I., … Woo, J.-M. (2014). The link between national paid leave policy and work–family conflict among married working parents. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63(1), 5–28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apps.12004Google Scholar
Bernin, P., Theorell, T., Cooper, C. L., Sparks, K., Spector, P. E., Radhakrishnan, P., & Russinova, V. (2003). Coping strategies among Swedish female and male managers in an international context. International Journal of Stress Management, 10(4), 376–391. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.10.4.376Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner, W. J. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research (pp. 137–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1994). Values Survey Module 1994 Manual. Maastricht, The Netherlands: University of Limburg.Google Scholar
Lapierre, L. M., Spector, P. E., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S., Cooper, C. L., O’Driscoll, M. P.,… Kinnunen, U. (2008). Family-supportive organization perceptions, multiple dimensions of work–family conflict, and employee satisfaction: A test of model across five samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 92–106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.02.001Google Scholar
Lu, L., Kao, S.-F., Cooper, C. L., Allen, T. D., Lapierre, L. M., O’Driscoll, M.,… Spector, P. E. (2009). Work resources, work-to-family conflict, and its consequences: A Taiwanese-British cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Stress Management, 16(1), 25–44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013988Google Scholar
Masuda, A. D., Poelmans, S. A., Allen, T. D., Spector, P. E., Lapierre, L. M., Cooper, C. L.,… Moreno-Velazquez, I. (2012). Flexible work arrangements availability and their relationship with work-to-family conflict, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison of three country clusters. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61(1), 1–29. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00453.xGoogle Scholar
Miller, K., Greyling, M., Cooper, C., Lu, L., Sparks, K., & Spector, P. E. (2000). Occupational stress and gender: A cross-cultural study. Stress Medicine, 16(5), 271–278. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-1700%28200010%2916:5%3C271::AID-SMI862%3E3.0.CO;2-GGoogle Scholar
Niblo, D. M., & Jackson, M. S. (2004). Model for combining the qualitative emic approach with the quantitative derived etic approach. Australian Psychologist, 39(2), 127–133. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00050060410001701843Google Scholar
Peterson, M. F., Smith, P. B., Akande, A., Ayestaran, S., et al. (1995). Role conflict, ambiguity, and overload: A 21-nation study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 429–452.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J. I., Alonso, A., & Spector, P. E. (2000). Linguistic Effects on Translated Organizational Measures: A Study of Bilinguals. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Toronto, August.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J. I., & Spector, P. E. (2012). Administrative, measurement, and sampling issues in large-scale cross-national research: UN or NATO approach? [References] Conducting Multinational Research: Applying Organizational Psychology in The Workplace (pp. 123–147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S. A., Lapierre, L. M., Cooper, C. L., O’Driscoll, M.,… Widerszal-Bazyl, M. (2007). Cross-national differences in relationships of work demands, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions with work–family conflict. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 805–835. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00092.xGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Poelmans, S., Allen, T. D., O’Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. I.,… Yu, S. (2004). A cross-national comparative study of work–family stressors, working hours, and well-being: China and Latin America versus the Anglo world. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 119–142. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02486.xGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Sanchez, J. I., O’Driscoll, M., Sparks, K., Bernin, P.,… Yu, S. (2001). Do national levels of individualism and internal locus of control relate to well-being: An ecological level international study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(8), 815–832. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.118Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Sanchez, J. I., O’Driscoll, M., Sparks, K., Bernin, P.,… Yu, S. (2002). Locus of control and well-being at work: How generalizable are Western findings? Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 453–466. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069359Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Sparks, K., Bernin, P., Buessing, A., Dewe, P.,… Yu, S. (2001). An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994: A comparison of individual and country/province level results. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(2), 269–281. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Liu, C., & Sanchez, J. I. (2015). Methodological and substantive issues in conducting multinational and cross-cultural research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), null. doi:doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414–111310Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Sanchez, J. I., Siu, O. L., Salgado, J., & Ma, J. (2004). Eastern versus Western control beliefs at work: An investigation of secondary control, socioinstrumental control, and work locus of control in China and the US. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(1), 38–60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00160.xGoogle Scholar
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of Culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405–439. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018938Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002Google Scholar
Werner, O., & Campbell, D. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In Carroll, R. & Cohen, R. (Eds.), A Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology (pp. 398–420). New York: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Yang, L.-Q., Spector, P. E., Sanchez, J. I., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S., Cooper, C. L.,… Woo, J.-m. (2012). Individualism-collectivism as a moderator of the work demands-strains relationship: A cross-level and cross-national examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 424–443. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.58Google Scholar