Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Surveying the Imagination Landscape
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives on the Imagination
- Part II Imagery-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part III Intentionality-Based Forms of the Imagination
- 19 Continuities and Discontinuities Between Imagination and Memory: The View from Philosophy
- 20 Imagining and Experiencing the Self on Cognitive Maps
- 21 The Neuroscience of Imaginative Thought: An Integrative Framework
- 22 Imagination and Self-Referential Thinking
- 23 Imaginary Friends: How Imaginary Minds Mimic Real Life
- 24 Imagination and Moral Cognition
- 25 Moral Reasoning: A Network Neuroscience Perspective
- 26 The Future-Directed Functions of the Imagination: From Prediction to Metaforesight
- Part IV Novel Combinatorial Forms of the Imagination
- Part V Phenomenology-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part VI Altered States of the Imagination
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
24 - Imagination and Moral Cognition
from Part III - Intentionality-Based Forms of the Imagination
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2020
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Surveying the Imagination Landscape
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives on the Imagination
- Part II Imagery-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part III Intentionality-Based Forms of the Imagination
- 19 Continuities and Discontinuities Between Imagination and Memory: The View from Philosophy
- 20 Imagining and Experiencing the Self on Cognitive Maps
- 21 The Neuroscience of Imaginative Thought: An Integrative Framework
- 22 Imagination and Self-Referential Thinking
- 23 Imaginary Friends: How Imaginary Minds Mimic Real Life
- 24 Imagination and Moral Cognition
- 25 Moral Reasoning: A Network Neuroscience Perspective
- 26 The Future-Directed Functions of the Imagination: From Prediction to Metaforesight
- Part IV Novel Combinatorial Forms of the Imagination
- Part V Phenomenology-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part VI Altered States of the Imagination
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
We spend large portions of our inner lives imagining social events and situations that fall under the umbrella of moral cognition. For example, we may simulate in our mind a future scenario in which we have to decide whether to withhold the truth to protect a colleague or a friend and wonder if it is the right thing to do or not. Or we may do the same for a past event or situation. This chapter briefly introduces the field of moral cognition with a focus on dual processing approaches, and then provides a critical review of recent empirical studies about the effect of various forms of mental simulations on a subset of moral cognitive processes. A number of behavioral studies show that imagination can affect moral cognitive processes in multiple ways, from enhancing our emotional responses to personal moral dilemmas and guiding our moral judgments, to facilitating theory of mind simulations and perspective-taking in prosocial scenarios. Ideas for future directions in the field are discussed in the final section.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination , pp. 390 - 405Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abraham, A. (2013). The Promises and Perils of the Neuroscience of Creativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 246. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00246.Google Scholar
Amit, E., and Greene, J. D. (2012). You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means: Visual Imagery and Moral Judgment. Psychological Science, 23(8), 861–868. doi:10.1177/0956797611434965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrade, J., Khalil, M., Dickson, J., May, J., and Kavanagh, D. J. (2016). Functional Imagery Training to Reduce Snacking: Testing a Novel Motivational Intervention Based on Elaborated Intrusion Theory. Appetite, 100, 256–262. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.015.Google Scholar
Bell, B. E., and Loftus, E. F. (1985). Vivid Persuasion in the Courtroom. Psychological Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(6), 659–664. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4906_16.Google Scholar
Branscombe, N. R., Owen, S., Garstka, T. A., and Coleman, J. (1996). Rape and Accident Counterfactuals: Who Might Have Done Otherwise and Would It Have Changed the Outcome? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(12), 1042–1067.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. M. (2016). Counterfactual Thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 135–157. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249.Google Scholar
Bzdok, D., Groß, D., and Eickhoff, S. B. (2015). The Neurobiology of Moral Cognition: Relation to Theory of Mind, Empathy, and Mind-Wandering. In Clausen, J. O. and Levy, N (eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 127–148.Google Scholar
Caruso, E. M., and Gino, F. (2011). Blind Ethics: Closing One’s Eyes Polarizes Moral Judgments and Discourages Dishonest Behavior. Cognition, 118(2), 280–285. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.008.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S., and Trope, Y. (1999). Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. F., Flexas, A., Calabrese, M., Gut, N. K., and Gomila, A. (2014). Moral Judgment Reloaded: A Moral Dilemma Validation Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 607. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00607.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. F., and Gomila, A. (2012). Moral Dilemmas in Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Decision-Making: A Principled Review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1249–1264. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.008.Google Scholar
Cipolletti, H., McFarlane, S., and Weissglass, C. (2016). The Moral Foreign-Language Effect. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 29(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
Civai, C., Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Gamer, M., and Rumiati, R. I. (2010). Are Irrational Reactions to Unfairness Truly Emotionally-Driven? Dissociated Behavioural and Emotional Responses in the Ultimatum Game Task. Cognition, 114(1), 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.001.Google Scholar
Corey, J. D., Hayakawa, S., Foucart, A., et al. (2017). Our Moral Choices Are Foreign to Us. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1109–1128. doi:10.1037/xlm0000356.Google ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., Foucart, A., Hayakawa, S., et al. (2014). Your Morals Depend on Language. PLoS One, 9(4), e94842. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crisp, R. J., and Turner, R. N. (2009). Can Imagined Interactions Produce Positive Perceptions? Reducing Prejudice Through Simulated Social Contact. American Psychologist, 64(4), 231–240. doi:10.1037/a0014718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, M. J. (2013). Models of Morality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 363–366. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and Punishment: Distinguishing the Roles of Causal and Intentional Analyses in Moral Judgment. Cognition, 108(2), 353–380. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006.Google Scholar
Cushman, F. (2013). Action, Outcome, and Value: A Dual-System Framework for Morality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(3), 273–292. doi:10.1177/1088868313495594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FeldmanHall, O., Dalgleish, T., Thompson, R., et al. (2012). Differential Neural Circuitry and Self-Interest in Real vs Hypothetical Moral Decisions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(7), 743–751. doi:10.1093/scan/nss069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foot, P. (1967). The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect. Oxford Review, 5, 1–7.Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., and Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, K. B., Gummerum, M., Ganis, G., Howard, I. S., and Terbeck, S. (2018). Virtual Morality in the Helping Professions: Simulated Action and Resilience. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 442–465. doi:10.1111/bjop.12276.Google Scholar
Francis, K. B., Howard, C., Howard, I. S., et al. (2016). Virtual Morality: Transitioning from Moral Judgment to Moral Action? PLoS One, 11(10), e0164374. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, K. B., Terbeck, S., Briazu, R. A., et al. (2017). Simulating Moral Actions: An Investigation of Personal Force in Virtual Moral Dilemmas. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 13954. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13909-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulford, J., Milton, F., Salas, D., et al. (2018). The Neural Correlates of Visual Imagery Vividness – An fMRI Study and Literature Review. Cortex, 105, 26–40. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.014.Google Scholar
Gaesser, B., Dodds, H., and Schacter, D. L. (2017). Effects of Aging on the Relation Between Episodic Simulation and Prosocial Intentions. Memory, 25(9), 1272–1278. doi:10.1080/09658211.2017.1288746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaesser, B., Keeler, K., and Young, L. (2018). Moral Imagination: Facilitating Prosocial Decision-Making Through Scene Imagery and Theory of Mind. Cognition, 171, 180–193. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaesser, B., and Schacter, D. L. (2014). Episodic Simulation and Episodic Memory Can Increase Intentions to Help Others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(12), 4415–4420. doi:10.1073/pnas.1402461111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrigan, B., Adlam, A. L., and Langdon, P. E. (2016). The Neural Correlates of Moral Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Moral Evaluations and Response Decision Judgements. Brain and Cognition, 108, 88–97. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.07.007.Google Scholar
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., and Surian, L. (2015). The Foreign Language Effect on Moral Judgment: The Role of Emotions and Norms. PLoS One, 10(7), e0131529. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131529.Google Scholar
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., and Surian, L. (2016). Foreign Language Affects the Contribution of Intentions and Outcomes to Moral Judgment. Cognition, 154, 34–39. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.010.Google Scholar
Gold, V. (1987). Psychological Manipulation in the Courtroom. Nebraska Law Review, 66(3), 562–583.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D., Kleider, H. M., Azuma, T., and Beike, D. R. (2003). “Blaming the Victim” Under Memory Load. Psychological Science, 14(1), 81–85. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D. (2013). Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them: New York, NY: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D. (2014). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment and Decision-Making. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences V. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D. (2015). The Rise of Moral Cognition. Cognition, 135, 39–42. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., and Haidt, J. (2002). How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., and Cohen, J. D. (2004). The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., and Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. doi:10.1126/science.1062872.Google Scholar
Hackel, L. M., and Amodio, D. M. (2018). Computational Neuroscience Approaches to Social Cognition. Current Opinion in Psychology, 24, 92–97. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.09.001.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayakawa, S., and Keysar, B. (2018). Using a Foreign Language Reduces Mental Imagery. Cognition, 173, 8–15. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helion, C., and Pizarro, D. A. (2015). Beyond Dual-Processes: The Interplay of Reason and Emotion in Moral Judgment. In Clausen, J. O. and Levy, N (eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 109–126.Google Scholar
Holmes, E. A., Mathews, A., Mackintosh, B., and Dalgleish, T. (2008). The Causal Effect of Mental Imagery on Emotion Assessed Using Picture-Word Cues. Emotion, 8(3), 395–409. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.395.Google Scholar
Kanheman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1971). From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away with It in the Study of Moral Development. In Mischel, T (ed.), Cognitive Development and Epistemology. New York, NY: Academic Press, 151–235.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on Moral Development, Vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Leloup, L., Miletich, D. D., Andriet, G., Vandermeeren, Y., and Samson, D. (2016). Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Right Temporo-Parietal Junction Modulates the Use of Mitigating Circumstances during Moral Judgments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 355. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, D., and DeSteno, D. (2016). Suffering and Compassion: The Links among Adverse Life Experiences, Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behavior. Emotion, 16(2), 175–182. doi:10.1037/emo0000144.Google Scholar
Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., and Griffiths, R. J. (1993). Counterfactual Thinking and the Perception of Criminal Behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 84(2), 221–226.Google Scholar
Maguire, E. A., and Mullally, S. L. (2013). The Hippocampus: A Manifesto for Change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1180–1189. doi:10.1037/a0033650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence and the Future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007.Google Scholar
Morawetz, C., Bode, S., Baudewig, J., and Heekeren, H. R. (2017). Effective Amygdala-Prefrontal Connectivity Predicts Individual Differences in Successful Emotion Regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(4), 569–585. doi:10.1093/scan/nsw169.Google Scholar
Ochsner, K. N., and Gross, J. J. (2005). The Cognitive Control of Emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 242–249. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010.Google Scholar
Parham, S. C., Kavanagh, D. J., Shimada, M., May, J., and Andrade, J. (2018). Qualitative Analysis of Feedback on Functional Imagery Training: A Novel Motivational Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology, 33(3), 416–429. doi:10.1080/08870446.2017.1360493.Google Scholar
Race, E., Keane, M. M., and Verfaellie, M. (2011). Medial Temporal Lobe Damage Causes Deficits in Episodic Memory and Episodic Future Thinking not Attributable to Deficits in Narrative Construction. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(28), 10262–10269. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1145-11.2011.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Bzdok, D., Timmermans, B., et al. (2012). Introspective Minds: Using ALE Meta-Analyses to Study Commonalities in the Neural Correlates of Emotional Processing, Social and Unconstrained Cognition. PLoS One, 7(2), e30920. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, M. F., Rakoczy, H., and Tomasello, M. (2012). Young Children Enforce Social Norms Selectively Depending on the Violator’s Group Affiliation. Cognition, 124(3), 325–333. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.004.Google Scholar
Sevinc, G., Gurvit, H., and Spreng, R. N. (2017). Salience Network Engagement with the Detection of Morally Laden Information. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(7), 1118–1127. doi:10.1093/scan/nsx035.Google Scholar
Sheeham, P. W. (1967). A Shortened Form of Betts’ Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 386–389.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, G. L., Fiez, J. A., Corbetta, M., et al. (1997). Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(5), 648–663. doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.648.Google Scholar
Solbrig, L., Whalley, B., Kavanagh, D. J., et al. (2018). Functional Imagery Training versus Motivational Interviewing for Weight Loss: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Brief Individual Interventions for Overweight and Obesity. International Journal of Obesity. doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0122-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., and Kim, A. S. (2009). The Common Neural Basis of Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, Navigation, Theory of Mind, and the Default Mode: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 489–510. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21029.Google Scholar
Sripada, C., Angstadt, M., Kessler, D., et al. (2014). Volitional Regulation of Emotions Produces Distributed Alterations in Connectivity between Visual, Attention Control, and Default Networks. Neuroimage, 89, 110–121. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.006.Google Scholar
Teigen, K. H., and Jensen, T. K. (2011). Unlucky Victims or Lucky Survivors?: Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking by Families Exposed to the Tsunami Disaster. European Psychologist, 16(1), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urry, H. L., van Reekum, C. M., Johnstone, T., and Davidson, R. J. (2009). Individual Differences in Some (But Not All) Medial Prefrontal Regions Reflect Cognitive Demand While Regulating Unpleasant Emotion. Neuroimage, 47(3), 852–863. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.069.Google Scholar
Young, L., Nichols, S., and Saxe, R. (2010). Investigating the Neural and Cognitive Basis of Moral Luck: It’s Not What You Do but What You Know. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(3), 333–349. doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0027-y.Google Scholar
Young, L., and Phillips, J. (2011). The Paradox of Moral Focus. Cognition, 119(2), 166–178. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.004.Google Scholar
Young, L., and Saxe, R. (2011). When Ignorance Is no Excuse: Different Roles for Intent across Moral Domains. Cognition, 120(2), 202–214. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.005.Google Scholar
Zeman, A., Dewar, M., and Della Sala, S. (2015). Lives without Imagery – Congenital Aphantasia. Cortex, 73, 378–380. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.019.Google Scholar
Zeman, A., Dewar, M., and Della Sala, S. (2016). Reflections on Aphantasia. Cortex, 74, 336–337. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhan, Y., Xiao, X., Li, J., et al. (2018). Interpersonal Relationship Modulates the Behavioral and Neural Responses during Moral Decision-Making. Neuroscience Letters, 672, 15–21. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.02.039.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by