Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:03:07.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Feminist Theory and Methodologies

Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries

from Section 1 - The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2020

By
Rekha Pande ,
Wen Liu  and
Hsunhui Tseng
Edited by
Fanny M. Cheung  and
Diane F. Halpern
Fanny M. Cheung
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Diane F. Halpern
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California
Get access

Summary

“Women’s Studies, Gender Studies, Feminist Studies,” with the theme of the subordination of women, is marked by diverse and overlapping intellectual traditions and movements. We take a non-Western perspective of this diversity. We use the terms interchangeably, as in the historical development from the earlier focus on Women’s Studies and more recent shift to Gender Studies in the West as well as in third world Women’s Studies, these disciplines have a close relationship with Feminism and the Women’s Movement and have gained from each other.The chapter covers issues including the Women’s Movements, Women’s Studies/Feminism, the different waves of feminism, feminist perspectives, feminist research / feminist methods, objectivity for feminist research and feminist theories. We cover theory and method for social science in general, but there is a section that features psychology specifically and highlights the different strands of feminism.

Keywords

Women’s Studiesgender studiesfeminist studiesfeminismWomen’s Movementfeminist perspectivesfeminist researchfeminist methodsfeminist theoriesandrocentric viewintersectionality
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women , pp. 14 - 26
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suggested Readings

Rekha Pande is the Head and founding member of the Centre for Women’s Studies and a Professor and former Head of the Department of History at the University of Hyderabad, India. She was also the founding member of the Center for Women’s Studies at Maulana Azad National Urdu University. She chaired the 12th Women’s World Congress in India, 2014. She has been a visiting Professor at University of London, University of Bristol, University of Buffalo, Maison de Research, Paris, and University of Artois. Her work is in the interdisciplinary area of history and women’s studies. She has published eighteen books and over a hundred papers and chapters in national and international journals, proceedings and books. She has been the editor of International Feminist Journal of Politics (IFJP) and Foreign Policy Analysis. Pande was born in northern India in the Himalayan region of the present state of Uttrakhand. As her father was an Indian Army officer who was posted every three years, she grew up in different states of India. During the early stage of her career, she spent summer and winter vacations visiting her husband who is a scientist working in Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Uganda. She now spends her summers visiting her children who have settled in the United States.

Wen Liu is Assistant Professor of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at University at Albany, State University of New York. Liu is currently working on a book titled Assembling Asian American: Psychological technologies and queer subjectivities, where she draws from queer theory, affect, and diasporic postcolonial studies to examine how psychology as a scientific discipline has created Asian Americanness as a measurable, biocultural population through a Eurocentric gaze. Her research has been published in internationally recognized journals such as Feminism & Psychology, Subjectivity, American Quarterly, and Journal of Asian American Studies. She is currently co-editing a special issue on “Feminisms and decolonizing psychology” for the journal Feminism & Psychology.  Liu was born in Taipei, Taiwan, and moved to the USA when she was 16 where she studied and stayed on for her career. She still strongly considers herself as a Taiwanese person politically, and identifies as a queer person of color.

Hsunhui Tseng is Assistant Professor in the Gender Studies Programme at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include globalization, marriage and family, transnational migration and human trafficking, student mobility, gender, class and race, identity politics, Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, and Southeast Asia. She is working on a manuscript tentatively titled Stratified foreign bodies: Commodified transnational marriage and the brokerage industry in Taiwan. Her works appear in journals such as Asian Anthropology, Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Cultural Review, and Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences. The courses she teaches at CUHK cover feminist methodology, gendered migration in Asia, family and society, and the intersectionality of gender, sexuality, and race throughout the world. Tseng was born in Taiwan where she attended her undergraduate studies and then went to the United States where she obtained her master’s and PhD degrees at the University of Washington, Seattle. She is currently a single mother working in Hong Kong.

Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, S. (1987) (Ed.). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Tong, R., & Botts, T. F. (2018). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (5th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

References

Angeloff, T., & Lieber, M. (2012). Equality, did you say? Chinese feminism after 30 years of reforms. China Perspectives, 2012(4), 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, N. K. (1995). “Grassroots empowerment (1975–1990).” (Mimeograph.) New Delhi: Center for Women’s Development Studies. http://www.cwds.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GrassrootEmpowerment.pdfGoogle Scholar
Basu, M. (2013). The girl whose rape changed a country [documentary]. United States: CNN.Google Scholar
Biggs, S., Phillipson, C., Leach, R., & Money, A. M. (2008). The mature imagination and consumption strategies: Age and generation in the development of a United Kingdom baby boomer identity. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 2(2), 31–59. doi:10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.072231Google Scholar
Bolotin, S. (1982). Voices from the post feminist generation, The New York Times Magazine, October 17. www.nytimes.com/1982/10/17/magazine/voices-from-the-post-feminist-generation.htmlGoogle Scholar
Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology (Gender and Psychology). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446279243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P. (2004). Acting otherwise: The institutionalization of women’s/gender studies in Taiwan’s universities. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203463789Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., & Chung, P. (2009). Central mechanisms: The Equal Opportunities Commission and the Women’s Commission. In Cheung, F. M. & Holroyd, E. (Eds.), Mainstreaming gender in Hong Kong society (pp. 369–400). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Chiang, L. H. (1995). Women’s movement, women’s studies. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 1(1), 152–159. doi:10.1080/12259276.1995.11665772Google Scholar
Crouch, B. (2012). Finding a voice in the academy: The history of women’s studies in higher education. Vermont Connection, 33(3), 16–23.Google Scholar
Desai, N., Dube, L., Mazumdar, V., Sharma, K., & Kelkar, G. (1984). Women’s studies and the social sciences: A report from India. Women’s Studies International, 3, 2–6.Google Scholar
Ding, N. (2010). Prostitutes, parasites and the house of state feminism. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 1(2), 305–318. doi:10.1080/14649370050141177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, E. (1997). Harriot Stanton Blatch and the winning of woman suffrage. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fraisse, G. (1995), as quoted in Freedman, J. (2002). Feminisms. New Delhi: Viva Books.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gillis, S., Howie, G., & Munford, R. (2004). Third wave feminism: A critical exploration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230523173Google Scholar
Glazer-Malbin, N., & Waehrer, H. Y. (1971). Women in a man-made world. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Guha, R. (2013). The past & present of Indian environmentalism.  The Hindu, March 27, 2013.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. Feminist Studies 14(3, 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066Google Scholar
Harding, S. (Ed.) (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? Centennial Review, 36(3), 437–440.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1995). “Strong objectivity”: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, 104(3), 331–349. doi:10.1007/BF01064504Google Scholar
Harding, S. (2003). How standpoint methodology informs philosophy of social science. In Turner, S. P. ad Roth, P. A. (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of the social sciences (pp. 291–310). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470756485.ch12Google Scholar
Hartsock, N. C. (1987). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding, (Ed.), Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hegarty, P. (2011). Becoming curious: An invitation to the special issue on queer theory and psychology. Psychology & Sexuality, 2(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/19419899.2011.536308Google Scholar
Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (2010). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
India, Ministry of Education and Social Welfare. (1975 ). Towards equality: Report of the Committee on the Status of Women. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. (2016). Women’s studies, gender studies and feminism. Discover Society, 30. discoversociety.org/2016/03/01/womens-studies-gender-studies-and-feminism/Google Scholar
Jaggar, A. M. (1989). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In A. M. Jaggar, and Bordo, S. (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (pp. 145–171). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kramarae, C., & Spender, D. (1993). The knowledge explosion: Generation of feminist scholarship. London: Harrvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Krishnaraj, M. (1986). Research on women and career: Issues of methodologies. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(43), WS67–WS74.Google Scholar
Krishnaraj, M. (1988) “How has women’s studies been defined?” (Mimeograp.)  Workshop on definition of women’s studies. Bombay: Tata Institute of Social Science.Google Scholar
Lim, A. (2015). Transnational feminism and women’s movements in post-1997 Hong Kong: Solidarity beyond the state. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. doi:10.5790/hongkong/9789888139378.001.0001Google Scholar
Liu, L., Karl, R., & Ko, D. (2013).  The birth of Chinese feminism: Essential texts in transnational theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, W. (2017). Toward a queer psychology of affect: Restarting from shameful places. Subjectivity, 10(1), 44–62. doi:10.1057/s41286-016-0014-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorde, A. (1980). Age, race, class, and sex: Women redefining difference. In B. Scott, , Cayleff, S., Donadey, A., & Lara, I. (Eds.), Women in culture: An intersectional anthology for gender and women’s studies (pp. 16–22). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, M. (1998). Women’s studies. In Jackson, S. and Jones, J. (Eds.), Contemporary feminist theories (pp. 247–258). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Minton, H. L. (1997). Queer theory: Historical roots and implications for psychology. Theory & Psychology, 7(3), 337–353.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In H. Roberts, (Eds.), Doing feminist research (pp. 8–18). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2000). From anti-arrack to total prohibition: The women’s movement in Andhra Pradesh, India. Gender, Technology and Development, 4(1), 131–144. doi:10.1177/097185240000400109Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2001). The social costs of globalization: Restructuring developing world economies. Journal of Asian Women’s Studies, 10, 1–14.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2002). The public face of a private domestic violence. International Feminist Journal, 4(3), 342–367.  doi:10.1080/1461674022000031535Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2003). Eco-feminism: Making connections between feminism and ecology. The Eastern Ghats, ENVIS, Newsletter, Environment Protection Training and Research Institute, 9(1), 7–8. www.academia.edu/3716746/Eco-Feminism_making_connections_between_Feminism_and_Ecology_Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2004). Engendering university curricula and teaching women’s studies in India – A critical evaluation. In R. Pande (Ed.), The indigenization of women’s studies teaching: The Asian Experience (pp. 52–82). Beijing: Contemporary China Publishing House, 52-82.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2013). Women’s studies: An institutional experience. Women’s Link, 19(2), 2–9.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2015). Indology and the women’s question: Discourses on women’s status-traditional past and continuing modern discourses. Manas, Studies into Asia and Africa. Electronic Journal of the Centre for Eastern Languages and Cultures, 2(1). http://manas.bg/en/tradition-and-modernity-indian-culture/indologiyata-i-zhenskata-problematika-diskursi-vrhu-statuta-na-zhenataGoogle Scholar
Pande, R. (2018a). Role of women in the early environment movements in India. In Z. M. Bora, and Sivaramakrishnan, M. (Eds.), Narratives of environmental challenges in Brazil and India: Losing nature (pp. 157–175). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2018b). The forgotten widows of Vrindawan. In R. Pande, and Weide, T. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural perspectives on gender and aging (pp. 200–216). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Panikkar,  K. N. (1975). Presidential address: Section III. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, thirty-sixth session, Aligarh, (pp. 365–399). www.jstor.org/stable/44138863?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M. (2004). The ascent of woman: A history of the suffragette movement and the ideas behind it. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. New Delhi: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446278901Google Scholar
Plummer, K., Kong, T., & Mahoney, D. (2001). Queering the interview. In Gubrium, Jaber F. & Holstein, James A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & methods (pp. 239–259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pollitt, K. (1995). Reasonable creatures: Essays on women and feminism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Poonacha, V. (2003). Women’s studies in Indian universities: Current concerns. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(26), 2653–2658.Google Scholar
Rattansi, A., & Phoenix, A. (2005). Rethinking youth identities: Modernist and postmodernist frameworks. In Bynner, J., Chisholm, L., & Fyrlong, A. (Eds.), Youth, citizenship and social change in a European context. Aldershot: Ashgate. Reprinted in Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 5(2), 97–123.Google Scholar
Rege, S. (1998). Dalit women talk differently – A critique of difference and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(44), WS39–WS46.Google Scholar
Reid, C. J. Jr. (2012). The journey to Seneca Falls: Mary Wollstonecraft, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the legal emancipation of women. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 10, 1123.Google Scholar
Richardson, D., Robinson, V., & Campling, J. (Eds.).  (1993). Introducing women’s studies: Feminist theory and practice. London: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-22595-8Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (2000). The world split open: How the modern women’s movement changed America. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Tharu, S., ＆ Niranjana, T. (1994). Problems for a contemporary theory of gender. Social Scientist, 22(3/4), 93–117. doi:10.2307/3517624Google Scholar
Tong, R. (1998). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tuchman, G., Daniels, A. K., & Benét, J. W. (1978). Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (1983). Women’s studies and social sciences in Asia: Report of a meeting of experts. New Delhi: Centre for Women’s Development Studies.Google Scholar
United Nations. (1976). Report of the World Conference of the International Women’s Year. New York. www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/otherconferences/Mexico/Mexico%20conference%20report%20optimized.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (1994). The social construction of heterosexuality. Journal of Gender Studies, 3(3), 307–316. doi:10.1080/09589236.1994.9960578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilton, T. (1993). Queer subjects: Lesbians, heterosexual women and the academy. In Kennedy, M., Lubelska, C., & Walsh, V. (Eds.), Making connections: Women’s studies, women’s movements and women’s lives (pp. 167–179). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Woodward, K., & Woodward, S. (2015). Gender studies and interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 1. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2015.18Google Scholar
Zeng, J. Y. (2015). Zhongguo nüquan zhuyi sanshi’nian [Chinese feminism for the past 30 years]. theinitium.com/article/20150924-opinion-china-feminism/Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×