Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T10:14:13.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Gerry Stahl ,
Timothy Koschmann  and
Daniel D. Suthers
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
Gerry Stahl
Affiliation:
Drexel University
Timothy Koschmann
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University
Daniel D. Suthers
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is an emerging branch of the learning sciences. It is concerned with studying how people can learn together with the help of computers.

As we will see in this chapter, such a simple statement conceals considerable complexity. The interplay of learning with technology turns out to be quite intricate. The inclusion of collaboration, computer mediation, and distance education has problematized the very notion of learning and called into question prevailing assumptions about how to study it.

Like many active fields of scientific research, CSCL has a complex relationship to established disciplines, it evolves in ways that are hard to pinpoint, and it includes important contributions that seem incompatible. The field of CSCL has a long history of controversy about its theory, methods, and definition. Furthermore, it is important to view CSCL as a vision of what may be possible with computers and of what kinds of research should be conducted, rather than as an established body of broadly accepted laboratory and classroom practices. We start from some popular understandings of the issues of CSCL and gradually reveal its more complex nature.

CSCL Within Education

As the study of particular forms of learning, CSCL is intimately concerned with education. It considers all levels of formal education from kindergarten through graduate study as well as informal education, such as in museums.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , pp. 409 - 426
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bruce, B. C., & Rubin, A. (1993). Electronic quills: A situated evaluation of using computers for writing in classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bruffee, K. (1993). Collaborative learning. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Button, G. Y., & Dourish, P. (1996). Technomethodology: Paradoxes and possibilities. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '96), Vancouver, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cakir, M., Xhafa, F., Zhou, N., & Stahl, G. (2005). Thread-based analysis of patterns of collaborative interaction in chat. Paper presented at the international conference on AI in Education (AI-Ed 2005), Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (1999a). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (1999b). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (2005). Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. In Bromme, R., Hesse,, F. & Spada, H. (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication – and how they may be overcome. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In Reimann, P. & Spada, H. (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Donmez, P., Rose, C., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005). Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology. Paper presented at the International Conference of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005), Taipei, Taiwan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, N., & Suthers, D. (2005). A study of the foundations of artifact-mediated collaboration. Paper presented at the international conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005), Taipei, Taiwan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Kosultit Oy.Google Scholar
Fischer, K., & Granoo, N. (1995). Beyond one-dimensional change: Parallel, concurrent, socially distributed processes in learning and development. Human Development, 1995 (38), 302–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (2005). Knowledge communication in design communities. In Bromme, R., Hesse, F. & Spada, H. (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication – and how they may be overcome. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goldman, R., Crosby, M., & Shea, P. (2004). Introducing quisitive research: Expanding qualitative methods for describing learning in ALN. In Hiltz, R. S. & Goldman, R. (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 103–121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gruber, S., Peyton, J. K., & Bruce, B. C. (1995). Collaborative writing in multiple discourse contexts. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 3, 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzdial, M., Hmelo, C., Hubscher, R., Newstetter, W., Puntambekar, S., Shabo, A.. (1997). Integrating and guiding collaboration: Lessons learned in computer-supported collaboration learning research at Georgia Tech. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL '97), Toronto, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (1996). Contextual inquiries: A discourse-oriented study of classroom learning. In Hicks, D. (Ed.), Discourse, learning and schooling (pp. 104–141). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoadley, C. (2005). The shape of the elephant: Scope and membership of the CSCL community. Paper presented at the international conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005), Taipei, Taiwan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kienle, A., & Wessner, M. (2005). Our way to Taipei: An analysis of the first ten years of the CSCL community. Paper presented at the international conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005), Taipei, Taiwan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996a). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T. (1996b). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology. In Koschmann, T. (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T. (2002a, April). Dewey's critique of Thorndike's behaviorism. Paper presented at the AERA 2002, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T. (2002b). Dewey's contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In Stahl, G. (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community: Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 17–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.). (2002). CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (in press). The video analyst's manifesto (or the implications of Garfinkel's policies for the development of a program of video analytic research within the learning sciences). In Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron,, B. & Derry, S. (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lowrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., Zemel, A., Conlee-Stevens, M., Young, N., Robbs, J., & Barnhart, A. (2003). Problematizing the problem: A single case analysis in a dPBL meeting. In Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S. & Hoppe, U. (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments: Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL '03) (pp. 37–46). Bergen, Norway: Kluwer Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In Resnick, L., Levine,, J. & Teasley, S. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–83). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, C. (2002). Technology does not exist independent of its use. In Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 433–439). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lingnau, A., Hoppe, H. U., & Mannhaupt, G. (2003). Computer supported collaborative writing in an early learning classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (2), 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. In Strijbos, J.-W., Kirschner, P., & Martens, R. (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 31–50). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in schools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolopoulou, A., & Cole, M. (1993). Generation and transmission of shared knowledge in the culture of collaborative learning: The fifth dimension, its playworld and its institutional contexts. In Forman, E., Minnick,, N. & Stone, C. A. (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O' Malley, C. (1995). Computer supported collaborative learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1974). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roschelle, J. (1996). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. In Koschmann, T. (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 209–248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In O'Malley, C. (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Sustainable support for computer-mediated collaboration: How to achieve and how to assess it. In Bromme, R., Hesse, F., & Spada, H. (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication – and how they may be overcome. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In Koschmann, T. (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1982). Mutual knowledge and relevance of theories of comprehension. In Smith, N. V. (Ed.), Mutual knowledge. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stahl, G. (in press). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suthers, D. (2005, May–June). Technology affordances for intersubjective learning: A thematic agenda for CSCL. Paper presented at the international conference of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005), Taipei, Taiwan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003, June). An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1912). Education: A first book. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pol, J., Admiraal, W., & Simons, R.-J. (2003, June). Grounding in electronic discussions: Standard (threaded) versus anchored discussion. Paper presented at the international conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2003), Bergen, Norway. Proceedings pp. 77–81.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1930/1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning environments with cooperation scripts. In Bromme, R., Hesse, F., & Spada, H. (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication – and how they may be overcome. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, B., Gallupe, B., & McQueen, R. (2000). A cognitive three-process model of computer-mediated group interaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, 431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemel, A., Xhafa, F., & Stahl, G. (2005, September). Analyzing the organization of collaborative math problem-solving in online chats using statistics and conversation analysis. Paper presented at the CRIWG International Workshop on Groupware, Recife, Brazil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×