Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T11:39:55.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Exploring Mathematics Through Construction and Collaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Richard Noss  and
Celia Hoyles
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
Richard Noss
Affiliation:
University of London
Celia Hoyles
Affiliation:
University of London
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Introduction

All learning environments are designed based on a set of assumptions about what knowledge should be learned. For example, most mathematics classrooms are designed to teach a certain kind of mathematical knowledge that comprises procedures that solve isolated problems quickly, and this implicitly devalues the importance of structural understanding or of developing an appreciation of underlying mathematical models (see Lehrer & Schauble, this volume). This means that all too often, students do not see the need for consistency or rigor, do not notice conflicting strategies or solutions, and therefore cannot learn from them.

Based on our research in a variety of workplace situations, we are convinced that a crucial element of knowledge required by most, if not all, people, is precisely this appreciation of underlying models. A version of mathematics that emphasizes structures also has the potential to help students understand the computational systems that are increasingly critical in today's society, because computer systems are mathematical models – computer software is built out of variables and relationships. As technology becomes more and more advanced, and the underlying models more and more obscure and invisible, it becomes increasingly important that children learn awareness of models; how to build, revise, and evaluate them, and to develop some analytic understanding of how inputs relate to outputs.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , pp. 389 - 406
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balacheff, N. (1993). Artificial intelligence and real teaching. In Keitel, C. & Ruthven, K. (Eds.), Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology (pp. 131–158). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. Contributions to Human Development, 21, 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cypher, A. (Ed.). (1993). Watch what I do: Programming by demonstration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
diSessa, A. A. (1997). Open toolsets: New ends and new means in learning mathematics and science with computers. In Pehkonen, E. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pp. 47–62. Lahti, Finland. (available at http://www.soe.berkeley.edu/boxer and www.pyxisystems.com, both accessed November 21, 2005)Google Scholar
Goldstein, R., Kalas, I., Noss, R., & Pratt D. (2001). Building rules. In Beynon, M., Nehaniv, C. L., & Dautenhahn, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Cognitive Technology CT2001 (pp. 267–281). Coventry, UK: University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Hoyles, C., Healy, L., & Pozzi, S. (1992). Interdependence and autonomy: Aspects of groupwork with computers. In Mandel, H., E. De Corte, Bennett, S. N., & Friedrich, H. F. (eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in international context (Vol. 2, pp. 239–257).Google Scholar
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2004). Making rules in collaborative game design. In Siraj-Blatchford, J. (Ed.), Developing new technologies for young children, pp. 55–73. Stoke on Trent/Sterling: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Adamson, R. (2002). Rethinking the microworld idea. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(1&2), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Kent, (2004). On the integration of digital technologies into mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, K. (1996). ToonTalk – An animated programming environment for children. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7(2), 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalas, I., & Blaho, A. (2000). Imagine … new generation of Logo: programmable pictures. In Proceedings of conference on educational uses of information and communication technologies, IFIP 16th world computer conference (pp. 427–430). ISBN 3-901882-07-3. Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littleton, K., & Hoyles, C. (2002). The gendering of information technology. In Yelland, N., & Rubin, A. (Eds.), Ghosts in the machine: Women's voices in research and technology (pp. 3–32). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Mor, Y., Hoyles, C., Kahn, K., Noss, R., & Simpson, G. (2004). Thinking in progress. Micromath, 20(2), 17–23.Google Scholar
Noss, R. (2001). For a learnable mathematics in the digital culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Gurtner, J-L., Adamson, R., & Lowe, S. (2002). Face-to-face and online collaboration: Appreciating rules and adding complexity. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning 12(5/6), 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roschelle, J. (1996). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. In Koschmann, T. (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 209–248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asscociates.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 38–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2005). Designing a programming-based approach for modelling scientific phenomena. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, pp. 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, G. (2001). Rediscovering CSCL. In Koschmann, T., Hall, R., Miyake, N. (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 177–178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asscociates.Google Scholar
Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and Artifacts: a contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×