Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T10:27:46.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - Scaling Up

Evolving Innovations Beyond Ideal Settings to Challenging Contexts of Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Chris Dede
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
Chris Dede
Affiliation:
Harvard University
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

“Scaling up” involves adapting an innovation that is successful in one setting to be effectively used in a wide range of contexts. In contrast to experiences in other sectors of society, scaling up successful programs has proved very difficult in education (Dede, Honan, & Peters, 2005). Innovations at one fast-food location may easily transfer to every store in that franchise and perhaps to any comparable type of restaurant. However, a new type of teaching strategy that is successful with one practitioner often is difficult to generalize even to other instructors in the same school, let alone to a broad range of practitioners. In general, the more complex the innovation and the wider the range of contexts, the more likely a new practice is to fail the attempt to cross the chasm from its original setting to other sites where its implementation could potentially prove valuable (Moore, 1999). In other words, scalable designs for educational transformation must avoid what Wiske and Perkins (2005) term the “replica trap”: the erroneous strategy of trying to repeat everywhere what worked locally, without taking account of local variations in needs and environments. This involves resolving problems of magnitude (fostering the necessary conditions for change in large numbers of settings with average resources at considerable distances from one another) and variation (diverse and often unfavorable conditions across settings).

In the context of innovations in teaching and curriculum, Coburn (2003) defines scale as encompassing four interrelated dimensions: depth, sustainability, spread, and shift in reform ownership.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , pp. 551 - 566
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agyris, C. (2004). Reasons and rationalizations: The limits to organizational knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berends, M., Bodilly, S. J., & Kirby, S. (2002). Facing the challenges of whole-school reform: New American Schools after a decade. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Carrigg, F., Honey, M., & Thorpe, R. (2005). Moving from successful local practice to effective state policy: Lessons from Union City. In Dede, C., Honan, J., & Peters, L. (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 1–26). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Coburn, C. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher 32(6): 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dede, C. (2003). No cliché left behind: Why education policy is not like the Movies. Educational Technology 43 (March–April), 5–10.Google Scholar
Dede, C. (2004). Design for defenestration: A strategy for scaling up promising research-based Innovations. Chicago, IL: NORC.Google Scholar
Dede, C. (2005). Why design-based research is both important and difficult. Educational Technology, 45, 5–8.Google Scholar
Dede. C., & Honan, J. (2005). Scaling up success: A synthesis of themes and insights. In Dede, C., Honan, J., & Peters, L. (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 227–239). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dede, C., Honan, J., Peters, L. (Eds.). (2005). Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement. New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dede, C., & Nelson, R. (2005). Technology as Proteus: Digital infrastructures that empower scaling up. In Dede, C., Honan, J., & Peters, L. (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 110–132). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dede, C., Nelson, B., Ketelhut, D., Clarke, J., & Bowman, C. (2004). Design-based research strategies for studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Learning Sciences, pp. 158–165. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fishman, B. (2005). Adapting innovations to particular contexts of use: A collaborative framework. In Dede, C., Honan, J., & Peters, L. (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 48–66). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S. B. (2005). Designing for scalable educational improvement: Processes of inquiry in practice. In Dede, C., Honan, J., & Peters, L. (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 67–96). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2000). Corporate failure by design: Why organizations are built to fail. New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In Minstrell, J. & Zee, E. H. V. (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 283–315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Means, B., & Penuel, W. R. (2005). Research to support scaling up technology-based educational innovations. In Dede, C., Honan, J., & Peters, L., Eds, Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 176–197). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Midgley, G. (Ed.). (2003). Systems theories and modeling (Volume II of Systems thinking). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. A. (1999). Crossing the chasm (Rev. ed.). New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
Morecraft, J. D. W., & Sterman, J. D. (Eds.). (2000). Modeling for learning organizations. New York: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
Moya, A., & Font, E. (Eds.). (2004). Evolution: From molecules to ecosystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2003). Learning for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved November 20, 2004, from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/downloads/P21_Report.pdf.
Perkins, D. N. (2003). King Arthur's round table: How collaborative conversations create smart organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2000). The knowing-doing gap. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Russell, M., Bebell, D., & O'Dwyer, L. (2003) Use, support, and effect of instructional technology study: An overview of the USEIT study and the participating districts. Boston, MA: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative. Retrieved August 29, 2004, from http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/studies/USEIT/description.shtml.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2000, April). The role of educative curriculum materials in reforming science education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Senge, P. M., Cambron-McCabe, N. H., Lucas, T., Kleiner, A., Dutton, J., & Smith, B. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Currency Press.Google Scholar
Snipes, J., Doolittle, F., & Herlihy, C. (2002). Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school districts improve student achievement. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools. Retrieved on November 27, 2004, from http://www.cgcs.org/reports/Foundations.html.Google Scholar
Spillane, J. P. (2002). Local theories of teacher change: The pedagogy of district policies and programs. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 377–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1996). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wiske, M. S., & Perkins, D. (2005). Dewey goes digital: Scaling up constructivist pedagogies and the promise of new technologies. In Dede, C., Honan, J., & Peters, L., Eds, Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 27–47). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Scaling Up
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Scaling Up
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Scaling Up
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.034
Available formats
×