Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Asia
- 3 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Japan
- 4 The Right to Freedom of Thought in China
- 5 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Vietnam
- 6 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Malaysia
- 7 The Right to Freedom of Thought in India
- Part III Europe
- Part IV Africa
- Part V Americas
- Part VI The Right to Freedom of Thought in Context
- Index
4 - The Right to Freedom of Thought in China
from Part II - Asia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2025
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Asia
- 3 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Japan
- 4 The Right to Freedom of Thought in China
- 5 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Vietnam
- 6 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Malaysia
- 7 The Right to Freedom of Thought in India
- Part III Europe
- Part IV Africa
- Part V Americas
- Part VI The Right to Freedom of Thought in Context
- Index
Summary
In the late 1940s, Chinese diplomats skillfully highlighted complementary aspects of Chinese philosophy to align with Western human rights concepts during the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. By emphasizing compatible cultural elements and ignoring inconsistencies, they successfully integrated Chinese cultural values into international human rights norms. This achievement was made possible by the diplomats’ education in both Chinese and Western traditions and the Chiang Kai-shek government’s preoccupation with the civil war, which allowed diplomats more autonomy. Despite this success, Confucian thought declined after the founding of the People’s Republic of China, and the Chinese Constitution does not explicitly mention freedom of thought, listing guiding ideologies that serve mainly as political declarations rather than practical legal principles. In contemporary Chinese court cases, the main theoretical issues around freedom of speech involve determining the boundaries of expression and whether statements constitute legal wrongs. With the development of social media and technologies, the line between public and private life has blurred. Chinese courts have touched upon the question of which ideas deserve legal protection, particularly in religious cases, but this question remains inadequately addressed and warrants continued research.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025