Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Asia
- Part III Europe
- 8 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Türkiye
- 9 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Germany
- 10 The Right to Freedom of Thought in France
- 11 The Right to Freedom of Thought in the United Kingdom
- 12 The Right to Freedom of Thought under the European Convention on Human Rights
- Part IV Africa
- Part V Americas
- Part VI The Right to Freedom of Thought in Context
- Index
12 - The Right to Freedom of Thought under the European Convention on Human Rights
from Part III - Europe
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2025
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Asia
- Part III Europe
- 8 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Türkiye
- 9 The Right to Freedom of Thought in Germany
- 10 The Right to Freedom of Thought in France
- 11 The Right to Freedom of Thought in the United Kingdom
- 12 The Right to Freedom of Thought under the European Convention on Human Rights
- Part IV Africa
- Part V Americas
- Part VI The Right to Freedom of Thought in Context
- Index
Summary
While research on the right to freedom of thought (FOT), as such, is already scarce, this chapter targets the European regional human rights framework in particular, attempting to fill the existing gap in research and literature. It aims to offer an exploratory analysis of the right to FOT through the prism of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and related jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Specifically, this chapter inquires whether the right to FOT can indeed be considered a right with independent value in the context of the ECHR, or whether it must rather be understood as an ancillary right, subordinate to and dependent on related ECHR rights (in a similar fashion as Article 14). In exploring this, a distinction must be drawn between the theoretical set-up of FOT in the ECHR and the drafters’ intention compared to how the ECtHR’s interpretation and application shaped the right in practice. By focusing on the question of its nature within the ECHR this chapter aims to stimulate further engagement with this under-researched right.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought , pp. 152 - 164Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025