Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:19:25.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - A Methodological Synthesis of Working Memory Tasks in L2 Research

from Part V - Bilingual Acquisition and Processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2022

By
Jihye Shin  and
Yuhang Hu
Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Shue Yan University
Get access

Summary

Drawing on work from cognitive psychology, a vast body of research has examined the role of working memory (WM) in second-language (L2) development, processing, and use (e.g., Linck et al., 2014). Our ability to discern such relationships, however, may be obscured by the different measures of WM that are adopted and employed by L2 researchers. There exist a daunting number of WM tasks, and the variability in task design, implementation, and scoring adds to the challenge of accurately measuring WM capacity and interpreting findings. To this end, this chapter presents a methodological synthesis that surveyed the literature spanning 20 years (2001-2020) of WM-L2 research to describe the use of six common WM tasks. We coded a total of 329 unique samples on a range of features related to the WM tasks and reporting practices. Our findings suggest that, among the six most common WM tasks used in L2 research, task design and scoring procedures tend to diverge more than converge within and among the tasks. We also found neglected areas in reporting practices in the WM-L2 domain. Based on our findings, we provide insights into the use of the WM tasks and future directions to help researchers make informed decisions for measuring WM and interpreting findings critically.L38

Keywords

working memory tasksworking memory capacitysecond language researchmethodological synthesistask designscoringreporting practices
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language , pp. 722 - 746
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.Google Scholar
Brunfaut, T., & Révész, A. (2015). The role of task and listener characteristics in second language listening. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance. System, 72, 85–98.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in brain research, 169, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullum, C. M., & Larrabee, G. J. (2010). WAIS-IV use in neuropsychological assessment. In Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Coalson, D., & Raiford, S. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation (pp. 167–188). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 34, 422–433.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
Drozdova, P., Van Hout, R., & Scharenborg, O. (2017). L2 voice recognition: The role of speaker-, listener-, and stimulus-related factors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142, 3058–3068.Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 413–433.Google Scholar
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2005). Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 581–590.Google Scholar
Gilabert, R., & Muñoz, C. (2010). Differences in attainment and performance in a foreign language: The role of working memory capacity. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 19–42.Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474.Google Scholar
Grundy, J. G., & Timmer, K. (2017). Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Second Language Research, 33, 325–340.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Y. (2019). Investigating effects of working memory training on foreign language development. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 665–685.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Y., Kobayashi, T., & Toyoshige, T. (2016). Investigating the relative contributions of computerised working memory training and English language teaching to cognitive and foreign language development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdnack, J. A. (2019). The development, expansion, and future of the WAIS-IV as a cornerstone in comprehensive cognitive assessments. In Growth-Marnat, G. & Wright, A. J. (Eds), Handbook of psychological assessment (pp. 103–139). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2015). Individual differences in the second language processing of object-subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 129–173.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. O. (2020). Working memory and second language development: A complex, dynamic future? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A. (2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21, 121–151.Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166.Google Scholar
Kam, E. F., Liu, Y. T., & Tseng, W. T. (2020). Effects of modality preference and working memory capacity on captioned videos in enhancing L2 listening outcomes. ReCALL, 32, 213–230.Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism, 11, 261.Google Scholar
Leeser, M. J. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57, 229–270.Google Scholar
Leeser, M., & Sunderman, G. (2016). Methodological issues of working memory tasks for L2 processing research. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 89–104). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Li, S., & Roshan, S. (2019). The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 1–15.Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López, E., Steiner, A. J., Hardy, D. J., IsHak, W. W., & Anderson, W. B. (2016). Discrepancies between bilinguals’ performance on the Spanish and English versions of the WAIS Digit Span task: Cross-cultural implications. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 23, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35–54.Google Scholar
Malone, J. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 651–675.Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2016). The IRIS repository: Advancing research practice and methodology. In Mackey, A. & Marsden, E. (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 1–21). Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics 39, 861–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. D., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Redick, T. S., Bunting, M., & Engle, R. W. (2020). The role of maintenance and disengagement in predicting reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 140.Google Scholar
Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity: Facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality & Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045.Google Scholar
Park, H., Nam, K., Lee, Y. (2016). The role of reading span in factual and inferential comprehension and retention in L2 reading. Linguistic Research, 33, 81–106.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Brown, D. (2015). Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31, 267–278.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Derrick, D. (2016). A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 538–553.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S. M., & Spinner, P. (2020). A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research, 36, 583–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, A., Degani, T., Awawdy, S., Yassin, R., & Korem, N. (2017). Is susceptibility to cross-language interference domain specific? Cognition, 165, 10–25.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N. (2017). Longitudinal effects of working memory on L2 grammar and reading abilities. Second Language Research, 33, 341–363.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2016). Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 607–646.Google Scholar
Shin, J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter? Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 873–900.Google Scholar
Shin, J., Dronjic, V., & Park, B. (2019). The interplay between working memory and background knowledge in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 320–347.Google Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., Megari, K., Kosmidis, M. H., Apostolidou, M., & Takou, E. (2012). Working memory and verbal fluency in simultaneous interpreters. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 624–633.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2008). The effect of working memory, semantic access, and listening abilities on the comprehension of conversational implicatures in L2 English. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16, 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolentino, L. C., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Cross‐language similarity modulates effectiveness of second language grammar instruction. Language Learning, 64, 279–309.Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Heitz, R. P., Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17, 635–654.Google Scholar
Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Administration and scoring manual. The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wen, Z. E. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wen, Z. E., Juffs, A., & Winke, P. (2020). Measuring working memory. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp. 167–176). Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III Test of Cognitive Abilities. Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
Zalbidea, J. (2017). “One task fits all?” The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×