Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:14:22.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Contesting Creator and Creation

from Part V - Contested Beliefs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2023

By
Paul M. Blowers
Edited by
Bruce W. Longenecker  and
David E. Wilhite
Bruce W. Longenecker
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
David E. Wilhite
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
Get access

Summary

Investigating Greco-Roman intellectual culture in the first three centuries of the Common Era, the historian looks in vain for a consolidated or thoroughly well-defined “Christian cosmology,” or a fully agreed-upon doctrine of creation. Indeed, as Christian apologists and theologians of the pre-Nicene age entered in earnest into the fray of long-standing philosophical debates over the nature of the universe, they had no antecedent interpretive synthesis of biblical sources on creation, though some consulted Hellenistic-Jewish writings while others willingly accessed doxographies containing the abbreviated opinions of the philosophical sages, or else read their works directly. More than one alternative, it seems, lay open to early-generation Christian thinkers. They could attempt to start from scratch with the biblical sources (including the gradually emerging New Testament writings) in constructing a Christian understanding of the cosmos that, in fideistic fashion, thoroughly ignored or circumvented traditions of Greco-Roman cosmology. Or, on the other hand, they could surrender to the fact that their sacred scriptures were not preoccupied with problems of theoretical cosmology and turn exclusively to other more immediate concerns of human salvation and the gospel of the eschatological “new creation.” Or, for better or worse, representing a religious faith having no philosophical past or pedigree solely to call its own, these pioneering Christian intellectuals could venture a critical but constructive engagement with the revered classical and Hellenistic authorities, staking out the philosophical plausibility of a distinctly Christian cosmology – all the more importantly since sophisticated pagan speculation about the god–world relation and the nature of the cosmos enjoyed resurgences well into the Byzantine age.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity , pp. 445 - 465
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Anderson, Gary and Bockmuehl, Markus (eds.) Creation ex nihilo: Origins, Development, Contemporary Challenges (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Andrew of Caesarea, . Commentary on the Apocalypse. Translated by Eugenia Constantinou (Fathers of the Church 123; Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Athanasius, . Contra gentes and De Incarnatione. Edited and translated by Thomson, Robert (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Athenagoras, . Legatio and De Resurrectione. Edited and translated by Schoedel, William (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, . Letters, vol. 1 (1–185). Translated by Way, Agnes Clare (Fathers of the Church 13; Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Behr, John. John the Theologian and His Paschal Gospel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blowers, Paul. Drama of the Divine Economy: Creator and Creation in Early Christian Theology and Piety (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Blowers, Paul. “The groaning and longing of creation: Variant patterns of patristic interpretation of Romans 8:19–23.” Pages 45–54 in vol. 63 of Studia Patristica. Edited by Vinzent, Markus (Leuven: Peeters, 2013).Google Scholar
Bruns, J. Edgar. “Philo Christianus: The debris of a legend,” Harvard Theological Review 66 (1973), 141‒5.Google Scholar
Chase, Michael. “Discussions on the eternity of the world in antiquity and contemporary cosmology,” ΣΧΟΛΗ 7 (2013), 20‒68.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar
Eunomius, . The Extant Works. Edited and translated by Vaggione, Richard (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Fantino, Jacques. La théologie d’Irénée: Lecture des Écritures en réponse à l’exégèse gnostique (Paris: Cerf, 1994).Google Scholar
Furley, David. The Greek Cosmologists, vol. 1, The Formation of the Atomic Theory and Its Earliest Critics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Grant, Edward. Science and Religion, 400 bc to ad 1550: From Aristotle to Copernicus (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzus, . Poemata arcana. Edited by Moreschini, Claudio. Translated by Sykes, D. A. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Holmes, Michael (ed.) The Apostolic Fathers, 3rd ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007).Google Scholar
Justin, . Justin, Philosopher and Martyr: Apologies. Edited by Minns, Denis and Parvis, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Köckert, Charlotte. Christliche Kosmologie und kaiserzeitliche Philosophie: Die Auslegung des Schöpfungsberichtes bei Origenes, Basilius und Gregor von Nyssa vor dem Hintergrund kaiserzeitlicher Timaeus-Interpretationen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucretius, . On the Nature of Things. Translated by Rouse, W. H. D.. Revised by Smith, Martin F. (LCL 181; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1924).Google Scholar
May, Gerhard. Creatio ex nihilo: The Doctrine of “Creation out of Nothing” in Early Christian Thought. Translated by Worrall, A. S. (London: T&T Clark, 2004).Google Scholar
Norris, Richard. God and World in Early Christian Theology (New York: Seabury Press, 1965).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Carl Séan. The Demiurge in Ancient Thought: Secondary Gods and Divine Mediators (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origen, . Contra Celsum. Translated by Chadwick, Henry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Origen, . Homilies on Genesis and Exodus. Translated by Heine, Ronald E. (Fathers of the Church 71; Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Origen, . On First Principles. Edited and translated by Behr, John (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Philoponus, . Against Proclus’ On the Eternity of the World 1–5. Translated by Share, Michael (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Presley, Stephen. The Intertextual Reception of Genesis 1‒3 in Irenaeus of Lyons (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar
Rudolph, Kurt. Gnosis: The Nature and History of Gnosticism (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1983).Google Scholar
Runia, David. Philo in Early Christian Literature: A Survey (CRINT; Assen: Van Gorum; Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Sedley, David. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Time, Creation, and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Steenberg, Matthew. Irenaeus on Creation: The Cosmic Christ and the Saga of Redemption (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar
Tertullian, . Homily on Baptism. Edited and translated by Evans, Ernest (London: SPCK, 1964).Google Scholar
Theodoret, . Questions on the Octateuch, vol. 1, On Genesis and Exodus. Greek text revised by Petruccione, John. Translated by Hill, Robert (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Theophilus, . Ad Autolycum. Edited and translated by Grant, Robert (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan. Arius: Heresy and Tradition, rev. ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×