China confronts the Soviet Union: warfare and diplomacy on China's Inner Asian frontiers

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521243377.004

3 - China confronts the Soviet Union: warfare and diplomacy on China's Inner Asian frontiers

from PART I - THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION: CHINA IN TURMOIL, 1966–1969

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Thomas Robinson

Edited by

Roderick MacFarquhar and

John K. Fairbank

Show author details

Thomas Robinson: Affiliation:
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Roderick MacFarquhar: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
John K. Fairbank: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

During the “active phase” of the Cultural Revolution, up to 1969, China deliberately adopted a low profile in foreign policy, as the country was consumed by internal disorder. The conscious foreign policy of the Cultural Revolution was to have as little of it as possible. China purposely went into diplomatic isolation, kept foreigners out of the country, lowered the level of commercial intercourse with other countries, steered clear of international institutions, and substituted Maoist rhetoric for more tangible means of policy. For a while, China was not a factor of consequence in global politics or even in Asian international relations.

Nevertheless, a chapter on this brief period can illustrate several verities of Chinese foreign policy. Among these are the interdependence and interpenetration of Chinese domestic developments and the international environment. Even though the Cultural Revolution was a period of almost exclusive Chinese attention to internal events, its causes were partly international, its initiation was delayed by occurrences outside China's borders, its effects were felt directly by China's neighbors and strongly even by nations and foreign offices at great distances from Peking, and its direction was abruptly altered by the threat of war in 1969 and after.

Another verity is the dependence of Chinese internal policy and international actions on the policies and actions of the United States and the Soviet Union. American intervention in Vietnam precipitated the strategic debate of 1965 that, in turn, helped divide the leadership along pro- and anti-Cultural Revolution lines; and Soviet intervention in Czechoslovakia in 1968 caused the Chinese leadership to take fright over the Soviet military buildup along the Chinese border and to catch the Soviets off guard with the Chen-pao Island raids early the next year.

Keywords

Chinese domestic political conflicts Cultural Revolution Chinese foreign policy Sino-Soviet border conflict Mao Tse-tung socioeconomic reforms

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of China , pp. 218 - 302

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243377.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adie, W. A. C., “China and the war in Vietnam,” Mizan, 8.6 (November-December 1966)

Adie, W. A. C., “Chou En-lai on safari,” China Quarterly, 18 (April-June 1964)Google Scholar

Alexander, Dallin, ed., Diversity in international communism: a documentary record, 1961–1963

Alexander, Woodside, “Peking and Hanoi: anatomy of a revolutionary partnership,” International Journal, 24.1 (Winter 1968–69)Google Scholar

Allen, S. Whiting, “The use of force in foreign policy by the People's Republic of China,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 402 (July 1972)Google Scholar

Allen, S. Whiting, “How we almost went to war with China,” Look, 33 (29 April 1969)

Antonie, C. A. Dake, In the spirit of the Red Banteng: Indonesian communists between Moscow and Peking 1959–1965

Arthur, J. Dommen, “The attempted coup in Indonesia,” China Quarterly, 25 (January-March 1966), 144–70; “Quarterly chronicle and documentation,” China Quarterly, 26 (April-June 1966).Google Scholar

Baum, Richard. Prelude to revolution: Mao, the Party, and the peasant question, 1962–66. New York: Columbia University Press, 1975.

BorisovKoloskov, O. B. B. T., Soviet-Chinese relations, 1945–1970.

Brian, Shaw, “China and North Vietnam:two revolutionary paths,” Current Scene, 9.11 (November 1971)Google Scholar

Carol, Bell, “Korea and the balance of power,” Political Quarterly, 25.1 (January-March 1954).Google Scholar

Cecil, Johnson, Communist China and Latin America, 1959–1967.

Charles, Neuhauser, Third World politics: China and the Afro-Asian People's Solidarity Organisation, 1957–1967.

Chiang, I–shan, “Military affairs of communist China, 1968,” Tsukiio, 59 (February 1969).

Chin, Chung, P'yongyang between Peking, and Moscow. North Korea's involvement in the Sino–Soviet dispute, 1958–1975.

Choudhury, G[olam] W. China in world affairs: the foreign policy of the PRC since 1970. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1982.

Daniel, D. Lovelace, China and “People's War” in Thailand, 1964–1969.

Deshpande, G. P., “China and Vietnam,” International Studies, 12.4 (October-December 1973)Google Scholar

Donald, Hindley, “Political power and the October 196; coup in Indonesia,” Journal of A sian Studies, 1969..Google Scholar

DonaldUri, S. Zagoria Ra'anan, “On Kremlinology: a reply to Michael Yahuda,” China Quarterly, 50 (April-June 1972).Google Scholar

Donald, S. Zagoria, The Sino-Soviet conflict, 1956–1961

Donald, W. Klein, “Peking's diplomats in Africa,” Current Scene, 2.36 (1 July 1964)Google Scholar

Doolin, Dennis J. Territorial claims in the Sino-Soviet conflict: documents and analysis. Stanford, Calif.: Hoover Institution, 1965.

Edgar, Snow, “Interview with Mao,” New Republic, 152 (27 February 1965).

Frank, N. Trager, “Sino–Burmese relations: the end o f the Pauk Phaw era,” Orbis, 11.4 (Winter 1968)

Frederick, C. Teiwes, Politics and purges in China: rectification and the decline of Party norms, 195O–1965

George, T. Yu, “Sino- African relations: a survey,” Asian Survey, 5.7 (July 1965)Google Scholar

Griffith, William E. Sino-Soviet relations, 1964–1965.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1967.

Harold, C. Hinton, ed., The People's Republic of China, 1949–1979. a documentary survey, 2..

Harrison, E. Salisbury, “Marco Polo would recognize Mao's Sinkiang,” New York Times Magazine, 23 November 1969Google Scholar

Henry, S. Albinski, “Chinese and Soviet policies in the Vietnam crisis,” Australian Quarterly, 40.1 (March 1968)Google Scholar

Hinton, , ed., The People's Republic of China, 1949–1979, vol. 4, documents

Hsiang, Nai–kuang, “The relations between Hanoi and Peiping,” Chinese Communist Affairs, 1.4 (December 1964)Google Scholar

Ilpyong, J. Kim, “Chinese Communist relations with North Korea: continuity and change,” Journal of A sian Studies, 13.4 (December 1970)Google Scholar

Ishwer, C. Ojha, The changing pattern of China's attitude toward a negotiated settlement in Vietnam, 1964–1971

Jiirgen, Domes, The internalpoliticsojChina, 1949–1972.

Johnson, Cecil. Communist China and Latin America, 1959–1967. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.

Joseph, C. Kun, “North Korea: between Moscow and Peking,” China Quarterly, 31 (July-September 1967)Google Scholar

Justus, M. Van Kroef, “Chinese subversion in Burma,” Indian Communist, 3.1–2 (March-June 1970).Google Scholar

King, C. Chen, “Hanoi vs. Peking: policies and relations –a survey,” Asian Survey, 12.9 (September 1972)Google Scholar

Kroef, , “The Sino-Indonesian partnership,” Orhis, 8.2 (Summer 1964).

Lin, Piao, “Address at the enlarged meeting of the CCP Central Politburo,” 18 May 1966, in Chinese haw and Government, 5.4 (Winter 1969/1970).Google Scholar

Lin, Piao, “Long live the victory of People's War!” Peking Review (later Beijing Review), 8.36 (3 September 1965).Google Scholar

Lin, Piao, “Report to the Ninth National Congress of the Communist Party of China,” Peking Review (later Beijing Review), 18 (30 April 1969).Google Scholar

Lo, Jui–ch'ing, “Commemorate the victory over German fascism! Carry the struggle against U.S. imperialism through to the end!” Hung-ch'i, 5 (1965), in PR, 8.20(14 May 1965).Google Scholar

Lynn, B. Pascoe, “China's relations with Burma, 1949–1964,” in Andrew, Cordier, ed., Columbia essays in international affairs: the dean'spapers, 1965Google Scholar

Michael, B. Yahuda, China's role in world affairs, 185, and the "Communique," 12 August 1966, Peking Review (later Beijing Review), 34(19 August 1966).Google Scholar

Michael, Yahuda, “Kremlinology and the Chinese strategic debate, 1965–66,” China Quarterly, 49 (January-March 1972)Google Scholar

Miksche, F. O., “USSR: Rot-China – An der Ostgrenze Russlands Wacht die Dritte Weltmacht,” Webr und Wirtscbajt (October 1974)Google Scholar

Neuhauser, Charles. Third World politics: China and the Afro-Asian People's Solidarity Organization, 1917–1967. Cambridge, Mass.: East Asian Research Center, Harvard University, 1968

Neville, Maxwell, “A note on the Amur/Ussuri sector of the Sino-Soviet boundaries,” Modern China, 1.1 (January 1975).Google Scholar

Richard, Baum and Frederick, C. Teiwes, Ssu-cb'ing: the Socialist Education Movement of 1962–1966

Richard, Baum, Prelude to revolution: Mao, the Party, and the peasant question, 1962–66

Robert, A. Holmes, “Burma's foreign policy toward China since 1962,” Pacific Affairs, 45.2 (Summer 1972)Google Scholar

Robert, A. Scalapino, “Africa and Peking's united front,” Current Scene, 3.26 (1 September 1965).Google Scholar

Robinson, , A political-military biography of Lin Piao, Part 2, 1950–1971.

Roy, U. T. Kim, “Sino–North Korean relations,” Asian Survey, 8 (August 1968)Google Scholar

Sardesar, D. R., “China and peace in Vietnam,” China Report, 5.3 (May-June 1969)Google Scholar

Tai-sung, An, “The Sino-Soviet dispute and Vietnam,” Orbis, 9.2 (Summer 1965)

Tania, Jacques, ‘“Sharqiy Turkstan’ or ‘Sinkiang’?” Radio Liberty Research, 7 March 1975.Google Scholar

Thomas, Robinson, “A politico-military biography of Lin Piao, Part II, 1950–1971.”

Thomas, W. Robinson, “The Wuhan Incident: local strife and provincial rebellion during the Cultural Revolution,” China Quarterly, 47 (July-September 1971).Google Scholar

Thomas, W. Robinson, “The Sino-Soviet border dispute: background, development, and the March 1969 clashes,” American Political Science Review, 66.4 (December 1972).Google Scholar

William, E. Griffith, “Sino-Soviet relations, 1964–65,” China Quarterly, 25 (January-March 1966).Google Scholar

William, E. Griffith, The Sino-Soviet rift and his Sino-Soviet relations, 1964–1965

William, Heaton, “Maoist revolutionary strategy and modern colonization: the Cultural Revolution in Hong Kong,” Asian Survey, 10.9 (September 1970)Google Scholar

William, W. Whitson, The Chinese high command: a history of communist military politics, 1927–71, ch. 11, “Strategy and tactics.”Google Scholar

Yao, Meng–hsien, “Chinese communists and the Vietnam War,” Issues Studies, 1.9 (June 1965).Google Scholar

Book contents

3 - China confronts the Soviet Union: warfare and diplomacy on China's Inner Asian frontiers

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive