Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:52:12.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Self-differentiation among Christian groups: the Gnostics and their opponents

from Part III - Community Traditions and Self-Definition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Margaret M. Mitchell
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Frances M. Young
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

When around 180 ce Bishop Irenaeus of Lyons wrote his Detection and refutation of gnōsis falsely so-called, known simply by the Latin title Adversus haereses (‘Against heresies’), he hoped to bring order to a confused situation. A bewildering number of ‘Christian’ groups and teachers offered interested persons salvation, often in the form of gnōsis (‘knowledge’ or ‘acquaintance’) with God. Yet the teachings and practices of these ‘Christians’ displayed an astonishing diversity on such issues as the nature(s) of God and the creator of this world and the content and interpretation of scripture. Irenaeus presented his readers with a powerfully simple way to make sense of these competing claims. There was, he argued, a single consistent Christian truth, deposited in a single church spread throughout the world in communities that could trace their heritage back to Christ and his original apostles. All other groups that claimed to be Christian, despite their seemingly infinite variety, in fact were manifestations of a single error, false gnōsis, which originated in a single teacher, Simon Magus (Acts 8:9–24). The clarity of Irenaeus’ vision is so compelling that even today, after more than a century of scholarship undermining it, we moderns must exert great pains to see the Christianities of the second century in any other way.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardy, G.Aux origines de l’école d’Alexandrie’, Recherches de science religieuse 27 (1937).Google Scholar
Bianchi, U. (ed.). Le origini dello gnosticismo: colloquio di Messina, 31–18 Aprile 1966, SHR 12 (1970).
Bousset, W. Hauptprobleme der Gnosis, FRLANT 10 (1907, repr. 1973).
Brakke, D.The seed of Seth at the flood: biblical interpretation and gnostic theological reflection’, in Reading in Christian communities: essays on interpretation in the early church, Bobertz, C. A. and Brakke, D. (eds.), CJA 14 (2002)Google Scholar
Buell, D. K.Rethinking the relevance of race for early Christian self-definition’, Harvard theological review 94 (2001).Google Scholar
Buell, D. K. Making Christians: Clement of Alexandria and the rhetoric of legitimacy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).
Bultmann, R. K.Der religionsgeschichtliche Hintergrund des Prologs zum Johannes Evangelium’, in Eucharisterion: Studien zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments, 2 vols., Schmidt, H. (ed.), FRLANT n.s. 19 (1923), vol. II Google Scholar
Dawson, D. Allegorical readers and cultural revision in ancient Alexandria (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).
Edwards, M. J.Neglected texts in the study of Gnosticism’, Journal of theological studies n.s. 41 (1990)Google Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C. Origen’s doctrine of tradition (London: SPCK, 1954).
Harnack, A. von. Lehrbuch der Dogmengeschichte, 3 vols. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1990; repr. of 4th ed., 1909); English translation: The history of dogma, 7 vols. in 4, trans. from the 3rd German ed., Buchanan, N. (trans.) (Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1976).
Harnack, A. von. Marcion: das Evangelium vom fremden Gott, ein Monographie zur Geschichte der Grundlegung der katholischen Kirche (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1921; 2nd ed. corr. and expanded 1924, repr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1960, 1985); English translation: Marcion: the gospel of the alien God, Steeley, J. and Bierma, L. (trans.) (Durham, N.C.: Labyrinth Press, 1990).
Jonas, H. The Gnostic religion: the message of the alien god and the beginnings of Christianity, 3rd ed. (Boston: Beacon Press, 2001).
King, K. L. Revelation of the unknowable God, California Classical library (Santa Rosa, CA: Polebridge, 1995).
Kugel, J. L., and Greer., R. A. Early biblical interpretation, LEC 3 (1986).
Lampe, P. From Paul to Valentinus: Christians at Rome in the first two centuries, Steinhauser, M. (trans.) (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003).
Layton, B.Prolegomena to the study of ancient Gnosticism’, in The social world of the first Christians: essays in honor of Wayne A. Meeks, White, L. M. and Yarbrough, O. L. (eds.) (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995)Google Scholar
Layton, B. . ‘The significance of Basilides in ancient Christian thought’, Representations 28 (1989)Google Scholar
Le Boulluec, A. La notion d’hérésie dans la littérature grecque, iie–iiie siècles, 2 vols. (Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1985).
Logan, A. B. Gnostic truth and Christian heresy (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996).
Logan, A. B. . ‘Gnosticism’, in The early Christian world, 2 vols., Esler, P. F. (ed.) (London: Routledge, 2000), vol. II Google Scholar
Lyman, R.Hellenism and heresy’, Journal of early Christian studies 11 (2003)Google Scholar
Markschies, C. Gnosis: an introduction, Bowden, J. (trans.) (London: T&T Clark, 2003).
Markschies, C. . ‘Valentinian Gnosticism: toward the anatomy of a school’, in The Nag Hammadi Library after fifty years: proceedings of the 1995 Society of Biblical Literature commemoration, Turner, J. D. and McGuire, A. M. (eds.), NHMS 44 (1997)Google Scholar
Norris, R. A.The insufficiency of scripture: Adversus haereses 2 and the role of scripture in Irenaeus’s anti-gnostic polemic’, in Reading in Christian communities: essays on interpretation in the early church, Bobertz, C. A. and Brakke, D. (eds.), CJA 14 (2002)Google Scholar
Pearson, B. A. Gnosticism, Judaism, and Egyptian Christianity (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990).
Rousseau, P. Pachomius: the making of a community in fourth-century Egypt, TCH 6 (1985).
Schenke, H.-M.The phenomenon and significance of gnostic Sethianism’, in The rediscovery of Gnosticism: proceedings of the international conference on Gnosticism at Yale, New Haven, Connecticut, March 28–31, 1978, 2 vols., Layton, B. (ed.), SHR 41 (1980–1), vol. II Google Scholar
Schenke, H.-M. . ‘Das sethianische System nach Nag-Hammadi Handschriften’, in Studia Coptica, Nagel, P. (ed.), Berliner byzantinistischer Arbeiten 45 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1974)Google Scholar
Sevrin, J.-M. Le dossier baptismal séthien: études sur la sacramentaire gnostique (Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval, 1986).
Standaert, B.L’évangile de vérité: critique et lecture’, New Testament studies 22 (1976)Google Scholar
Tabbernee, W.To pardon or not to pardon? North African Montanism and the forgiveness of sins’, StPatr 36 (2001)Google Scholar
Thomassen, E.Orthodoxy and heresy in second-century Rome’, Harvard theological review 97 (2004).Google Scholar
Trigg, J. W.The charismatic intellectual: Origen’s understanding of religious leadership’, Church history 50 (1981)Google Scholar
Turner, J. D. ‘Sethian Gnosticism: a literary history’, in Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, and early Christianity, Hedrick, C. W. and Hodgson, R. (eds.) (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1986)
Turner, J. D. . ‘Sethian Gnosticism: a literary history’, Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic tradition, Bibliothèque copte de Nag Hammadi, section études 6 (Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval, 2001).
Turner, J. D. and Majercik, R. (eds.). Gnosticism and later Platonism: themes, figures, and texts, SBLSymS 12 (2000).
von Staden, H.Hairesis and heresy: the case of the haireseis iatrikai ’, in Self-definition in the Graeco-Roman world, Meyer, B. F. and Sanders, E. P. (eds.) (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982)Google Scholar
Williams, M. A. Rethinking ‘Gnosticism’: an argument for dismantling a dubious category (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).
Young, F. M. Biblical exegesis and the formation of Christian culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×