Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- I Political thought after the French Revolution
- 1 Counter-revolutionary thought
- 2 Romanticism and political thought in the early nineteenth century
- 3 On the principle of nationality
- 4 Hegel and Hegelianism
- 5 Historians and lawyers
- 6 Social science from the French Revolution to positivism
- 7 Radicalism, republicanism and revolutionism
- II Modern liberty and its defenders
- III Modern liberty and its critics
- IV Secularity, reform and modernity
- Biographies
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - Historians and lawyers
from I - Political thought after the French Revolution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- I Political thought after the French Revolution
- 1 Counter-revolutionary thought
- 2 Romanticism and political thought in the early nineteenth century
- 3 On the principle of nationality
- 4 Hegel and Hegelianism
- 5 Historians and lawyers
- 6 Social science from the French Revolution to positivism
- 7 Radicalism, republicanism and revolutionism
- II Modern liberty and its defenders
- III Modern liberty and its critics
- IV Secularity, reform and modernity
- Biographies
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Law and political thought
How is law related to political thought in modern European history? There are three different answers to this question that apply here. One derives from what may be called the legislative or statutory model of legal philosophy, which, following good classical precedent, identified law with the will of the sovereign, whether located in a monarchical or in a republican form of government. In the eighteenth century the legislative paradigm can be seen in the theory and practice of enlightened despotism and especially in the codification movement, which touched many European states, including Prussia, Austria and France (Tarello 1976; cf. Wisner 1997). European codes, modelled largely on the Corpus Juris Justiniani (ad 529–33), were intended to organise all private law (especially the law of persons and property) into a single system and in this way, whether directly or indirectly, to politicise it. This agenda was realised most famously in the Napoleonic Code, but it can also be seen in monarchists such as Joseph de Maistre, Louis de Bonald, and Friedrich von Stahl and Utilitarians such as Jeremy Bentham and John Austin, who defined law simply as a command of sovereign power.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought , pp. 147 - 170Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
- 1
- Cited by