Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- I Political thought after the French Revolution
- 1 Counter-revolutionary thought
- 2 Romanticism and political thought in the early nineteenth century
- 3 On the principle of nationality
- 4 Hegel and Hegelianism
- 5 Historians and lawyers
- 6 Social science from the French Revolution to positivism
- 7 Radicalism, republicanism and revolutionism
- II Modern liberty and its defenders
- III Modern liberty and its critics
- IV Secularity, reform and modernity
- Biographies
- Bibliography
- Index
3 - On the principle of nationality
from I - Political thought after the French Revolution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- I Political thought after the French Revolution
- 1 Counter-revolutionary thought
- 2 Romanticism and political thought in the early nineteenth century
- 3 On the principle of nationality
- 4 Hegel and Hegelianism
- 5 Historians and lawyers
- 6 Social science from the French Revolution to positivism
- 7 Radicalism, republicanism and revolutionism
- II Modern liberty and its defenders
- III Modern liberty and its critics
- IV Secularity, reform and modernity
- Biographies
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Introductory comments
Nationality can be constructed as fact and value. Its construction as value presupposes its construction as fact. First, there are nations; second, nations are bearers of values. However, nations can be constructed as facts without regarding them also as bearers of values on which to base cultural or political programmes.
I define the principle of nationality as consisting of three claims: humanity is divided into nations; nations are worthy of recognition and respect; recognition and respect require autonomy, usually meaning political independence within the national territory. Thus the principle of nationality contains an empirical claim, a value assertion and a political goal, each building on the previous proposition. These are logical relationships; they do not necessarily occur in that chronological order. This principle was constructed in nineteenth–century Europe. The empirical, normative and programmatic constructions took on increasingly complex, differentiated and conflicting forms as the principle of nationality loomed an ever larger role in political culture and practice.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
- 2
- Cited by