Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:57:18.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Classifying the Sciences

from Part II - Disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Roy Porter
Affiliation:
Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
Get access

Summary

Since Plato and Aristotle, philosophers of the Western tradition have placed a premium on the organization of knowledge. When knowledge is ordered, subdivided, and controlled we speak of trees, fields, maps, and bodies – metaphors suggesting definite structures and relationships. When knowledge is regarded as chaotic, overwhelming, or undifferentiated, we speak of labyrinths, mazes, or oceans – still perhaps implying that an order exists but acknowledging that it is not yet visible. The ancient philosophers endorsed the first, and positive, side of this dichotomy in two related ways: first, by privileging logically demonstrable, or at least systematically organized, bodies of knowledge as scientia or science, distinguishing them from other forms of knowledge, such as opinion, craft, or technical skills (techne); second, by seeking to demonstrate how the various sciences are related, in some rational manner, to one another in an overarching classification of knowledge. These maps or charts indicated appropriate paths of education and learning. Schemes of this kind were produced by the scholastic thinkers of the Middle Ages and they informed, and were themselves reinforced by, the pedagogy and curricula of the universities through to the Renaissance and beyond. To travel one of these paths was to master the “encyclopedy,” the circle of sciences.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, Francis, “A Description of the Intellectual Globe,” in The Works of Francis Bacon, collected and edited by Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert Leslie, and Heath, Douglas Denon, 14 vols. (London: Longman, 1857–74; reprinted Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: F. Frommann Verlag, 1961–3), vol. 5.Google Scholar
[Barrow, John], A Supplement to the New and Universal Dictionary (London: printed for the Proprietors, 1754).Google Scholar
Brewer, John and Porter, Roy (eds.), Consumption and the World of Goods (London: Routledge, 1993)Google Scholar
Brewer, John and Bermingham, Ann, The Consumption of Culture, 1600–1800: Image, Object, Text (New York: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
Broberg, Gunnar, “The Broken Circle,” in Frängsmyr, Tore, Heilbron, J. L., and Rider, Robin E. (eds.), The Quantifying Spirit in the 18th Century (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Brown, Gary, “The Evolution of the Term ‘Mixed Mathematics,’Journal of the History of Ideas, 52 (1991)Google Scholar
Burke, Peter, “Reflections on the History of Information in Early Modern Europe,” Scientiarum Historia, 17 (1991).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, trans. Koelln, F. and Pettegrove, J. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Clark, George, Science and Social Welfare in the Age of Newton (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973, 2nd ed. 1970).Google Scholar
Crosland, Maurice, In the Shadow of Lavoisier: The Annales de Chemie and the Establishment of a New Science (Oxford: British Society for the History of Science, 1994).Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean Le Rond, Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, translated with an introduction by Schwab, Richard N. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert, “Philosophers Trim the Tree of Knowledge,” in The Great Cat Massacre and Other Essays in French Cultural History (London: Penguin, 1985).Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert, The Business of Enlightenment: A Publishing History of the Encyclopédie, 1775–1800 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, “Classifications of Knowledge in the Age of Louis XIV,” in Rubin, David L. (ed.), Sun King: The Ascendancy of French Culture during the Reign of Louis XIV (London: Associated University Presses, 1992).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, “Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity,” Annals of Scholarship, 8 (1991)Google Scholar
Dear, Peter, Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Diderot, , cited in Koepp, Cynthia J., “The Alphabetical Order: Work in Diderot’s Encyclopédie,” in Kaplan, Steven Laurence and Koepp, Cynthia J. (eds.), Work in France: Representations, Meaning, Organization, and Practice (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Dolby, R. G. A., “Classification of the Sciences: The Nineteenth Century Tradition,” in Ellen, Roy. F. and Reason, David (eds.), Classifications in Their Social Context (London: Academic Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Fara, Patricia, Sympathetic Attractions: Magnetic Practices, Beliefs, and Symbolism in Eighteenth-Century England (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Nicholas, “The Classification of the Sciences,” in Olby, R.C., Cantor, G. N., Christie, J. R. R. and Hodge, M. J. S. (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
Flint, Robert, Philosophy as Scientia Scientiarum and a History of Classification of the Sciences (Edinburgh, 1904)Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (London: Tavistock, 1970).Google Scholar
Freedman, Joseph S., “Diffusion of the Writings of Petrus Ramus in Central Europe, c. 1570–c. 1630,” Renaissance Quarterly, 46 (1993).Google Scholar
Gascoigne, John, “The Eighteenth-Century Scientific Community: A Prospographical Study,” Social Studies of Science, 25 (1995).Google Scholar
Goetschel, Willi, MacLeod, Catriona, and Snyder, Emery, “The Deutsche Encyclopädie and Encyclopedism in Eighteenth-Century Germany,” in Donato, Clorinda and Maniquis, Robert M. (eds.), The Encyclopédie and the Age of Revolution (Boston: G. K. Hall, 1992).Google Scholar
Groethuysen, Bernard, cited in Dieckmann, Herbert, “The Concept of Knowledge in the Encyclopédie,” in Dieckmann, Herbert, Levin, Harry, and Motekat, Helmut (eds.), Essays in Comparative Literature (St. Louis, MO: Washington University Studies, 1961).Google Scholar
Hampson, Norman, A Cultural History of the Enlightenment (New York: Pantheon Books, 1968)Google Scholar
Hankins, Thomas, Science and the Enlightenment (Cambridge University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, , Lexicon Technicum (London: Brown, Goodwin et al., 1710), vol. 2, “Introduction,” no pagination. The “Alphabetical Index” is at the end of this volume.Google Scholar
Harris, , Lexicon, 1710, vol. 2, Introduction, for the paper by NewtonGoogle Scholar
Henry, John, The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science (London: Macmillan, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, James, An Investigation of Principles of Knowledge (Edinburgh: A. Strahan, 1794), vol. 3.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Emmet, “Destutt de Tracy and the Unity of the Sciences,” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 171 (1977).Google Scholar
Kenny, Neil, The Palace of Secrets: Beroalde de Verville and Renaissance Conceptions of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., “Mathematical versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science,” in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977). See also Dear, Discipline and Experience.Google Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko, “Bacon’s Classification of Knowledge,” in Peltonen, Markku (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Bacon (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried W., Philosophical Writings (London: J. M. Dent, 1995), ed. Parkinson, G. H. R., trans. Morris, M. and Parkinson, G. H. R..Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried W., “Precepts for Advancing the Sciences and Arts,” in Wiener, Philip P. (ed.), Leibniz: Selections (New York: Scribner’s, 1951)Google Scholar
Lyon, John and Sloan, Phillip (eds.), From Natural History to the History of Nature (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981), p. 2.Google Scholar
Martin, Benjamin, The Philosophical Grammar, 2nd ed., 1738 [1st ed. 1735], (London: J. Noon)Google Scholar
Martin, Benjamin, The General Magazine of Arts and Sciences (London: W. Owen, 1755).Google Scholar
Martin, , A Course of Lectures in Natural and Experimental Philosophy (Reading, 1743).Google Scholar
May, Georges, “Observations on an Allegory: The Frontispiece of the Encyclopédie,” Diderot Studies, 16 (1973).Google Scholar
McKendrick, Neil, Brewer, John, and Plumb, J. H., The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England (London: Europe Publications, 1982)Google Scholar
McRae, Robert, The Problem of the Unity of the Sciences: Bacon to Kant (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Partington, J. R., “Chemistry through the Eighteenth Century,” in Ferguson, Alan (ed.), Natural Philosophy Through the 18th Century and Allied Topics (London: Taylor and Francis, 1972).Google Scholar
Porter, Roy, The Making of Geology: Earth Science in Britain 1660–1815 (Cambridge University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Rees, Graham (assisted by Christopher Upton), Francis Bacon’s Natural Philosophy: A New Source (Chalfont St. Giles: British Society for the History of Science, 1984), n. 45Google Scholar
Roszak, Theodore, The Cult of Information: The Folklore of the Computer and the True Art of Thinking (New York: Pantheon, 1986)Google Scholar
Rousseau, G. S. and Porter, Roy (eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science (Cambridge University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Charles, Aristotle and the Renaissance (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, Robert, “The Encyclopaedic Spirit,” in Korshin, Paul J. and Allen, Robert R. (eds.), Greene Centennial Studies: Essays Presented to Donald Greene (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Speziali, Pierre, “Classification of the Sciences,” in Wiener, Philip, 5 vols. (New York: Scribner’s, 1968–74), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Stewart, Larry, The Rise of Public Science: Rhetoric, Technology, and Natural Philosophy in Newtonian Britain, 1660–1750 (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Thomson, Thomas, “Chemistry,” in Gleig, George (ed.), Supplement to the Third Edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica (Edinburgh: T. Bonar, 1801), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn, A History of Magic and Experimental Science, 8 vols. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1923–58), vol. 3.Google Scholar
Tonelli, G., “The Problem of the Classification of the Sciences in Kant’s Time,” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 30 (1975)Google Scholar
Wallace, William A., “Traditional Natural Philosophy,” in Skinner, Quentin and Kessler, Eckhard (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Watts, Isaac, The Improvement of the Mind, 3rd ed. (London: T. Longman and J. Buckland, 1743).Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A., “The Nature, Scope and Classification of the Sciences,” in Lindberg, David C. (ed.), Science in the Middle Ages (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A., “Classification of the Sciences in Medieval Thought,” Medieval Studies, 27 (1965)Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General, translated, with an introduction and notes, by Blackwell, Richard J. (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963).Google Scholar
Yeo, Richard, “Reading Encyclopedias: Science and the Organization of Knowledge in British Dictionaries of Arts and Sciences, 1730–1850,” Isis, 82 (1991).Google Scholar
Yeo, Richard, “Alphabetical Lives: Scientific Biography in Historical Dictionaries and Encyclopaedias,” in Shortland, Michael and Yeo, Richard (eds.), Telling Lives in Science: Essays on Scientific Biography (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Yeo, Richard, “Ephraim Chambers’s Cyclopaedia and the Tradition of Commonplaces,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 57 (1996).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Classifying the Sciences
  • Edited by Roy Porter, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Classifying the Sciences
  • Edited by Roy Porter, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Classifying the Sciences
  • Edited by Roy Porter, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.011
Available formats
×