Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: The Age of the New
- Part I The New Nature
- 2 Physics and Foundations
- 3 Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature
- 4 The Meanings of Experience
- 5 Proof and Persuasion
- Part II Personae and Sites of Natural Knowledge
- Part III Dividing the Study of Nature
- Part IV Cultural Meanings of Natural Knowledge
- Index
- References
5 - Proof and Persuasion
from Part I - The New Nature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: The Age of the New
- Part I The New Nature
- 2 Physics and Foundations
- 3 Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature
- 4 The Meanings of Experience
- 5 Proof and Persuasion
- Part II Personae and Sites of Natural Knowledge
- Part III Dividing the Study of Nature
- Part IV Cultural Meanings of Natural Knowledge
- Index
- References
Summary
Questions of proof and persuasion are important in the history of the sciences of any period, but they are particularly pressing in the case of early modern Europe. The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries saw more self-conscious theoretical reflection on how to discover and confirm the truths of nature than any period before or since; the same period also manifested a huge range of practical strategies by which investigators of the natural world set about demonstrating their findings and convincing their audiences of their claims. Studying these strategies of proof and persuasion has opened up vistas of opportunity for historians of the sciences in early modern Europe. In a range of disciplines, from the social history of medicine to the history of philosophy, historians of the period have argued for the ineradicable significance of forms of proof and persuasion in understanding their various objects of inquiry. The rhetorical form of texts and even objects has come to be seen as constitutive of their meaning, not separable from it. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies have shown how early modern physicians, mathematical practitioners, and natural philosophers all exploited the different and historically specific resources of proof and persuasion that they had at their disposal.
The study of proof and persuasion provides a further opportunity to the historian: It offers a means of bridging the gap between a text (or a practice) and its reception. As the reception, rather than the genesis, of developments in the sciences has become an increasingly important aspect of historiography, it has also become increasingly apparent that this reception history is often extremely difficult to reconstruct.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 132 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
“Graphic Understanding: Instruments and Interpretation in Robert Hooke’s Micrographia,” Science in Context, 3 (1989).Google Scholar
De methodo… Über die Methode, ed. , trans. (Düsseldorf: Stern-Verlag/Janssen and Co., 1971).Google Scholar
De inventione dialectica libri tres / Drei Bücher über die Inventio dialectica: Auf der Grundlage der Edition von Alardus von Amsterdam [1539], ed. (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. , revised by , in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. , 2 vols. (Bollingen Series, 71) (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
and , La logique ou l’art de penser [1662–83], ed. and , 2nd ed. (Paris: J. Vrin, 1981).Google Scholar
, “Editor’s Introduction,” in , Logicae artis compendivm (1618), ed. (Instrumenta Rationis, 2) (Bologna: Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice Bologna, 1985).Google Scholar
“The Teaching of Logic in Two Protestant Academies at the End of the 16th Century: The Reception of Zabarella in Strasbourg and Geneva,” Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte, 80 (1989).Google Scholar
De augmentis scientiarum, in Works, ed. , , and Health, 7 vols. (London: Longman, 1857).Google Scholar
Novum organum with Other Parts of the Great Instauration, ed. , trans. (Chicago: Open Court, 1994).Google Scholar
The Advancement of Learning [1605], ed. (The Oxford Francis Bacon, 4) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).Google Scholar
, The New Organon, trans. , ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Is Seventeenth-Century Physics Indebted to the Stoics?” Centaurus, 27 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “The Role of Comets in the Copernican Revolution,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 19 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata was first published in his Opera posthuma ([Amsterdam?], 1677).Google Scholar
Pensées diverses sur la comète [1682], ed. , rev. by , 2 vols. in I (Paris: Société des Textes Françsais Modernes, 1994).Google Scholar
Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988).Google Scholar
, and , eds., The Figural and the Literal: Problems of Language in the History of Science and Philosophy, 1630–1800 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
“Scientific Revolution, Social Bricolage, and Etiquette,” in The Scientific Revolution in National Context, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
The Theater of Nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
, “Methodus ad facilem historiarum cognitionem,” in Oeuvres philosophiques, ed. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1951).Google Scholar
Method for the Easy Comprehension of History, trans. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1945).Google Scholar
and , Divini and Campani: A Forgotten Chapter in the History of the Accademia del Cimento (Florence: Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza, 1981).Google Scholar
La certezza e la storia: Cartesianismo, pirronismo e conoscenza storica (Milan: F. Angeli, 1983).Google Scholar
, A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things [1688], in The Works of Robert Boyle, ed. and , 14 vols. (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2000), II.Google Scholar
A History of Aristotle’s Rhetoric: With a Bibliography of Early Printings (Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1989).Google Scholar
, “The Terms ‘loci communes’ and ‘loci’ in Melanchthon,” Church History, 16 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis Bacon and the Rhetoric of Nature (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Académie Royale des Sciences and the Pursuit of Utility,” Past and Present, 131 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre Gassendi: From Aristotelianism to a New Natural Philosophy (Synthèse Historical Library: Texts and Studies in the History of Logic and Philosophy, 30) (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Rhetoric of Experiment,” in The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences, ed. , , and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Rhetorica ad Herennium, 2.i.1, trans. (Loeb Classical Library) (London: Heinemann, 1954).Google Scholar
and , “Latin Tractates on Preaching: A Booklist,” Harvard Theological Review, 42 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Descartes and the Resilience of Rhetoric (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Generall Learning: A Seventeenth-Century Treatise on the Formation of the General Scholar, ed. (Renaissance Texts from Manuscript, 2) (Cambridge: RTM, 1999).Google Scholar
, De partitione oratoria, 2.1, trans. and , in De oratore III, De fato, Paradoxa stoicorum, De partitione oratoria (Loeb Classical Library) (London: Heinemann, 1948).Google Scholar
“‘A Knowledge Broken’: Francis Bacon’s Aphoristic Style and the Crisis of Scholastic and Humanist Knowledge-Systems,” in English Renaissance Prose: History, Language, and Politics, ed. (Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 164) (Tempe, Ariz.: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1997).Google Scholar
“In Search of ‘the true logick’: Methodological Eclecticism among the ‘Baconian Reformers’,” in Samuel Hartlib and Universal Reformation: Studies in Intellectual Communication, ed. , , and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
A Proposition for the Advancement of Experimental Philosophy (London: Printed by J. M. for Henry Herringman, 1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Renaissance Dialogue: Literary Dialogue in Its Social and Political Contexts, Castiglione to Galileo (Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture, 2) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Legalizing Medicine: Early Modern Legal Systems and the Growth of Medico-Legal Knowledge,” in Legal Medicine in History, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
and , “Galileo and the Art of Rhetoric,” Nouvelles de la république des lettres, 2 (1988).Google Scholar
“Mathematics and Platonism in the Sixteenth-Century Italian Universities and in Jesuit Educational Policy,” in Prismata, Naturwissenschaftsgeschichtliche Studien, ed. and (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1977).Google Scholar
“Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity,” Annals of Scholarship, 8 (1991).Google Scholar
“Probability and Evidence,” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. and , 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
“Strange Facts, Plain Facts, and the Texture of Scientific Experience in the Enlightenment,” in Proof and Persuasion: Essays on Authority, Objectivity, and Evidence, ed. and (Turnhout: Brepols, 1996).Google Scholar
“The Doctrine of Chances without Chance: Determinism, Mathematical Probability, and Quantification in the Seventeenth Century,” in The Invention of Physical Science: Intersections of Mathematics, Theology and Natural Philosophy Since the Seventeenth Century: Essays in Honor of Erwin N. Hiebert, ed. , , and (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 139) (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992).Google Scholar
Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
“‘Parcere nominibus’: Boyle, Hooke and the Rhetorical Interpretation of Descartes,” in Robert Boyle Reconsidered, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Revolutionizing the Sciences: European Knowledge and Its Ambitions, 1500–1700 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
“From Truth to Disinterestedness in the Seventeenth Century,” Social Studies of Science, 22 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Jesuit Mathematical Science and the Reconstitution of Experience in the Early Seventeenth Century,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 18 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
ed., The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument: Historical Studies (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Science and Education in the Seventeenth Century: The Webster-Ward Debate (London: Macdonald, 1970).Google Scholar
Early Modern Philosophy and Postmodern Thought (Toronto Studies in Semiotics) (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Saggi di naturali esperienze fatte nell’Accademia del Cimento sotto la protezione del Serenissimo Principe Leopoldo di Toscana e descritte dal Segretario di essa Accademia (Florence: Giuseppe Cocchini, 1667).Google Scholar
“Discourse on the Method,” trans. , , and , in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985–91).Google Scholar
Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. and , 12 vols. (Paris: J. Vrin, 1964–76) vol. 6: Discours de la méthode & Essais (1973).Google Scholar
Scientia rerum natura occultarum: Methodologische Studien zur Physik Pierre Gassendis (Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie, 14) (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Influence of Francis Bacon on Diderot’s Interprétation de la nature,” Romanic Review, 24 (1943).Google Scholar
“Aristotle’s Four Causes: Forgotten topos of Renaissance Rhetoric,” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 17 (1987).Google Scholar
“Galileo’s Letter to Christina: Some Rhetorical Considerations,” Renaissance Quarterly, 36 (1983).Google Scholar
“Newton and the Jesuits in the Philosophical Transactions,” in Newton and the New Direction in Science: Proceedings of the Cracow Conference 25 to 28 May 1987, ed. , , and (Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, 1988).Google Scholar
“The Interplay of Science and Rhetoric in Seventeenth-Century Italy,” Rhetorica, 7 (1989).Google Scholar
Les Loix civiles dans leur ordre naturel, 2nd ed., 3 vols. (Paris: Jean Baptiste Coignard, 1691–97), 2.Google Scholar
Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
“Niccolò Leoniceno and the Origins of Humanist Discussion of Method,” in Philosophy and Humanism: Renaissance Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1976).Google Scholar
“Baconianism in the Seventeenth-Century Netherlands: A Preliminary Survey,” Nuncius, 6 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
to , The Correspondence of Robert Boyle, 1636–91, ed. , , and , 6 vols. (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2001).Google Scholar
“Mathematicians and Naturalists: Sir Isaac Newton and the Royal Society,” in Isaac Newton’s Natural Philosophy, ed. and (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000).Google Scholar
“Tradition versus Novelty: Universities and Scientific Societies in the Early Modern Period,” in Revolution and Continuity: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Early Modern Science, ed. and (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1991).Google Scholar
The Mathematicians’ Apprenticeship: Science, Universities, and Society in England, 1560–1640 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
“Public Anatomy Lessons and the Carnival: The Anatomy Theatre of Bologna,” Past and Present, 117 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galileo and the Art of Reasoning: Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 61) (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Rhetoric of Science in England of the Mid-Seventeenth Century,” in Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Literature, ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963).Google Scholar
“Berengario da Carpi and the use of Commentary in Anatomical Teaching,” in The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, ed. , , and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
“Sign Conceptions in Medicine from the Renaissance to the Early Nineteenth Century,” in Semiotik: Ein Handbuch zu den zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur, ed. , , and (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1998).Google Scholar
Meteorum, hoc est, impressionum aerearum et mirabilium naturae operum, loci fere omnes, methodo dialectica conscripti, & singulari quadam cura diligentiaque in eum ordinem digestiac distributi (Nuremberg: Montanus and Neuber, 1563).Google Scholar
Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
and , “On the Emergence of Probability,” Archive for the History of Exact Science, 21 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Apples, Oranges, and the Role of Gassendi’s Atomism in Seventeenth-Century Science,” Perspectives on Science, 3 (1995).Google Scholar
“The Universities and the Scientific Revolution: The Case of Newton and Restoration Cambridge,” History of Science, 23 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes’s Conception of Inference (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
De magnete, magneticisque corporibus, et de magno magnete tellure: Physiologia nova, plurimis & argumentis, & experimentis demonstrata (London: Peter Short, 1600; facsimile repr. Brussels: Culture and Civilisation, 1967).Google Scholar
Lexicon philosophicum (Frankfurt am Main: Petrus Musculus and Rupert Pistorius, 1613).Google Scholar
Impolite Learning: Conduct and Community in the Republic of Letters, 1680–1750 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Language, Discourse, and Science,” in Companion to the History of Modern Science, ed. , , , and (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
“Rhetorical Structure and Function in the Anatomy of Melancholy,” Rhetorica, 19 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Le Sublime du lieu commun: L’Invention rhetorique dans l’Antiquité et à la Renaissance (Paris: Honoré Champion, 1996).Google Scholar
“Jean Hardouin: The Antiquary as Pariah,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 62 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardano’s Cosmos: The Worlds and Works of a Renaissance Magician (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Commerce with the Classics: Ancient Books and Renaissance Readers (Jerome Lectures, 20) (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds., Rhetorical Hermeneutics: Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997).Google Scholar
The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction, and Statistical Inference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971).Google Scholar
The Enduring Monument: A Study of the Idea of Praise in Renaissance Literary Theory and Practice (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1962).Google Scholar
“Rhetoric and the Social Construction of Sickness and Healing,” Social History of Medicine, 12 (1999).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“Rhetoric and Graphics in Micrographia,” in Robert Hooke: New Studies, ed. and (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 1989).Google Scholar
“Francis Bacon’s New Science: Print and the Transformation of Rhetoric,” in Media, Consciousness, and Culture: Explorations of Walter Ong’s Thought, ed. , , and (Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1991).Google Scholar
“‘Because the authority of my superiors commands’: Censorship, Physics, and the German Jesuits,” Early Science and Medicine, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
, “Erasmian Ciceronians: Reformation Teachers of Letter-writing,” Rhetorica, 10 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “On Reading the Rhetoric of the Renaissance Letter,” in Renaissance-Rhetorik, ed. (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1993).Google Scholar
The School of Padua and the Emergence of Modern Science (Padua: Editrice Antenore, 1961).Google Scholar
De corpore, in The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, ed. , 11 vols. (London: Bohn, 1839). vol. 1.Google Scholar
Leviathan [1651], ed. , rev. ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), chap. 4.Google Scholar
Thomas White’s “De Mundo” Examined, trans. (Bradford: Bradford University Press, 1976), chap. 1.Google Scholar
“A General Scheme, or Idea of the Present State of Natural Philosophy,” in Hooke, Posthumous Works, ed. (London: Samuel Smith and Benjamin Walford, 1705; facsimile repr. London: Frank Cass, 1971).Google Scholar
, “A Calculation of the Credibility of Human Testimony,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 21 (1699).Google Scholar
The Acta Eruditorum under the Editorship of Otto Mencke: The History of an International Learned Journal between 1682 and 1707, trans. (Amsterdam: APA–North Holland University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
, “Their Manner of Discourse”: Nachdenken uber Sprache im Umkreis der Royal Society (Tübingen: Narr, 1989).Google Scholar
and , “Towards Solomon’s House: Rival Strategies for Reforming the Early Royal Society,” History of Science, 24 (1986).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Establishing the New Science: The Experience of the Early Royal Society (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 1989).Google Scholar
, Science and Society in Restoration England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
in about 1663, Oeuvres complètes de Huygens, 22 vols. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1888–1950).Google Scholar
“Distinctive Discipline: Rudolph Agricola’s Influence on Methodical Thinking in the Humanities,” in Rodolphus Agricola Phrisius (1444–1485): Proceedings of the International Conference at the University of Groningen, 28–30 October 1985, ed. and (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1988).Google Scholar
“Lorenzo Valla and the Intellectual Origins of Humanist Dialectic,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 15 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974)Google Scholar
“Demonstration, Dialectic, and Rhetoric in Galileo’s Dialogue,” in The Shapes of Knowledge from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, ed. and (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991).Google Scholar
“Galileo’s Road to Truth and the Demonstrative Regress,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 7 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Keeping Order in the School of Padua: Jacopo Zabarella and Francesco Piccolomini on the Offices of Philosophy,” in Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, ed. , , and (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997).Google Scholar
“Scepticism in Renaissance Astronomy: A Preliminary Study,” in Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, ed. and (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1987).Google Scholar
“The Places of Astronomy in Early Modern Culture,” Journal for the History of Astronomy, 29 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Historical Introduction,” in Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Logic in Late Sixteenth-Century England: Humanist Dialectic and the New Aristotelianism,” Studies in Philology, 88 (1991).Google Scholar
“Prudence and Pedantry in Early Modern Cosmology: The Trade of Al Ross,” History of Science, 35 (1997).Google Scholar
The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Mathematical Practitioners and Instruments in Elizabethan England,” Annals of Science, 48 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Expert Witnesses: Science, Medicine, and the Practice of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
The Tradition of the Topics in the Middle Ages: The Commentaries on Aristotle’s and Boethius’ “Topics” (Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 1984).Google Scholar
“Expert Testimony in Historical Perspective,” Law and Human Behaviour, 10 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Development and Context of Bodin’s Method,” in Jean Bodin: Verhandlungen der internationalen Bodin-Tagung in München 1970, ed. (Munich: Beck, 1973).Google Scholar
History, Law, and the Human Sciences: Medieval and Renaissance Perspectives (London: Variorum Reprints, 1984), chap. 8.Google Scholar
, “Pulpit Eloquence: A List of Doctrinal and Historical Studies in English,” Speech Monographs, 22 (1955).Google Scholar
“Ars inveniendi: A Classical Source for Contemporary Philosophy of Science,” Revue internationale de philosophie, 34 (1980).Google Scholar
“Mathematical versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 7 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacred Rhetoric: The Christian Grand Style in the English Renaissance (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
“The Historia piscium (1686),” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 54 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“One Hundred Years of Rectitude: Medical Witnesses at the Old Bailey, 1717–1817,” Law and History Review, 16 (1986).Google Scholar
A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms, 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991).Google Scholar
The Rise and Decline of the Scholastic “Quaestio Disputata”: With Special Emphasis on Its Use in the Teaching of Medicine and Science (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1993).Google Scholar
Digression sur les Anciens et les Modernes [1688], ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955).Google Scholar
“Preface” to the Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences. Année M.DC.XX (Paris: Jean Boudot, 1702).Google Scholar
ed., Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, 9 vols. (Paris: Gabriel Martin, 1729–33).Google Scholar
“Le concept de l’encyclopaedia dans l’oeuvre de Guillaume Budé,” in Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Torontonensis: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies, Toronto, 8 August to 13 August 1988, ed. , , and (Binghamton, N.Y.: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1991).Google Scholar
“The Topics of Argumentative Invention in Latin Rhetorical Theory from Cicero to Boethius,” Rhetorica, 1 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Disourse touchant la méthode de la certitude et l’art d’inventer” and , La Logique de Leibniz (Paris: Félix Alcan, 1901).Google Scholar
“University Natural Philosophy in Renaissance Italy: The Decline of Aristotelianism?” in The Dynamics of Natural Philosophy in the Aristotelian Tradition (and Beyond): Doctrinal and Institutional Perspectives, ed. , , and (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2002).Google Scholar
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1690], ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Some Thoughts Concerning Education, ed. and (The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
“Imagined Universities: Public Insult and the Terrae filius in Early Modern Oxford,” History of Universities, 16 (2000).Google Scholar
Renaissance Argument: Valla and Agricola in the Traditions of Rhetoric and Dialectic (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History, 43) (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Evidence, Logic, the Rule and the Exception in Renaissance Law and Medicine,” Early Science and Medicine, 5 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“The Interpretation of Natural Signs: Cardano’s De subtilitate versus Scaliger’s Exercitationes,” in Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
The Renaissance Notion of Woman: A Study in the Fortunes of Scholasticism and Medical Science in European Intellectual Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Interpretation and Meaning in the Renaissance: The Case of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
“Aristotelian Logic and Euclidean Mathematics: Seventeenth-Century Developments of the Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 23 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
“Indizi e prove nella cultura greca: Forza epistemica e criteri di validità dell’inferenza semiotica,” Quaderni storici, 85, no. 29 (1994).Google Scholar
Francis Bacon, the State and the Reform of Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
, Funeral Oratory and the Cultural Ideals of Italian Humanism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
The Experimenters: A Study of the Accademia del Cimento (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the Nature of Arts and Sciences (Societas Historica Finlandiae Studia Historica, 41) (Helsinki: SHS, 1992).Google Scholar
“Humanism and Rhetoric,” in Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy, ed. , 3 vols. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988), vol. 3: Humanism and the Disciplines.Google Scholar
“Lorenzo Valla and Rudolph Agricola,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 28 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Galileo’s Rhetorical Strategies in Defense of Copernicanism,” in Novità celesti e crisi del sapere: atti del convegno internazionale di studi Galileiani, ed. (Florence: Giunti Barbèra, 1984).Google Scholar
, “The Rhetoric of Proof in Galileo’s Writings on the Copernican System,” in Reinterpreting Galileo, ed. (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1986).Google Scholar
, Novelties in the Heavens: Rhetoric and Science in the Copernican Controversy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
, ed., Renaissance Eloquence, and , ed., Renaissance Rhetoric (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994).Google Scholar
Renaissance Rhetoric: A Short-title Catalogue of Works on Rhetorical Theory from the Beginning of Printing to A. D. 1700 (New York: Garland, 1981).Google Scholar
Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from St. Augustine to the Renaissance (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974).Google Scholar
and , “Rhetorical Incunabula: A Short-title Catalogue of Texts Printed to the Year 1500,” Rhetorica, 15 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Determining the Patient’s Temperament: An Excursion into Seventeenth-Century Medical Semiology,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 67 (1993).Google Scholar
John Craige’s Mathematical Principles of Christianity (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Instructions Concerning Erecting of a Library, trans. (London: G. Bedle, T. Collins, and J. Crook, 1661.Google Scholar
“The Rhetoric of Utility: Avoiding Occult Associations for Mathematics through Profitability and Pleasure,” History of Science, 37 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Rise of Medical Humanism: Ferrara, 1464–1555,” Bulletin of the Society for Renaissance Studies, II (1997).Google Scholar
, Praise and Blame in Renaissance Rome: Rhetoric, Doctrine, and Reform in the Sacred Orators of the Papal Court, c. 1450–1521 (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Neostoicism and the Early Modern State, ed. and , trans. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Robert Hooke’s Methodology of Science as Exemplified in his ‘Discourse of Earthquakes’,” British Journal for the History of Science, 6 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Some ‘Philosophical Scribbles’ Attributed to Robert Hooke,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 35 (1980).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ed., Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna, 2 vols. (Padua: Editrice Antenore, 1983).Google Scholar
, “Some Writings of Robert Hooke on Procedures for the Prosecution of Scientific Inquiry, Including his ‘Lectures of Things Requisite to a Natural History’,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 41 (1987).Google Scholar
, Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
, ed., Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“John Locke and the Changing Ideal of Scientific Knowledge,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 31 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholastic Medicine and Philosophy: A Study of Commentaries on Galen’s Tegni (Uppsala: Institutionen för Idé-och Läardomhistoria, Uppsala University, 1982).Google Scholar
“De l’esprit géometrique et de l’art de persuader,” in Oeuvres complètes, ed. (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1963).Google Scholar
and , Persuading Science: The Art of Scientific Rhetoric (Canton, Mass.: Science History Publications, 1991).Google Scholar
De communibus omnium rerum naturalium principiis et affectionibus libri quindecem (Rome, 1576).Google Scholar
Francis Bacon’s Idea of Science and the Maker’s Knowledge Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
, “Bacon’s Legacy,” in The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Political Arithmetick; Or, a discourse concerning the extent and value of lands, people, … & c. (London: Robert Clavel and Henry Mortlock, 1690).Google Scholar
English Renaissance Rhetoric and Poetics: A Systematic Bibliography of Primary and Secondary Sources (Symbola et Emblemata, 6) (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995).Google Scholar
(), Tractatus de signis: The semiotic of John Poinsot [1632], ed. with (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).Google Scholar
The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza, 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).Google Scholar
, “Symposium on the Rhetoric of Science,” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 7, no. 1 (1989).Google Scholar
, “The Literary Uses of the Rhetoric of Science,” Studies in the Literary Imagination, 22, no. 1 (1989).Google Scholar
A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Dialectique 1555: Un manifeste de la Pléiade, ed. (De Pétrarque à Descartes, 61) (Paris: J. Vrin, 1996).Google Scholar
“Introduction,” in Renaissance Debates on Rhetoric, ed. and trans. (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
, “The Textbook Tradition in Natural Philosophy, 1600–1650,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 30 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ed., A General Collection of Discourses of the Virtuosi of France (London: Thomas Dring and John Starkey, 1664).Google Scholar
Recueil general des questions traictees és conferences du Bureau d’Adresse (Paris: G. Loyson, 1655–6).Google Scholar
“Valla’s Elegantiae and the Humanist Attack on the Ars dictaminis,” Rhetorica, 19 (2001).Google Scholar
Geometrischer Geist und Naturrecht: Methodengeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur Staatsophilosophie im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert (Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1970).Google Scholar
Francis Bacon: From Magic to Science, trans. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968).Google Scholar
The Humanist–Scholastic Debate in the Renaissance and Reformation (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
and , eds., The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 vols. (Madison/London: University of Wisconsin Press/Mansell/Taylor and Francis, 1965–86).Google Scholar
“Res et verba: Words and Things,” ELH: A Journal of English Literary History, 13 (1946).Google Scholar
That Nothing is Known (Qvod nihil scitvr), ed. , trans. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
“New Structures of Knowledge,” in A History of the University in Europe, gen. ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992–), vol. 2: Universities in Early Modern Europe (1500–1800), ed. (1996).Google Scholar
“Galileo and the Seventeenth-Century Text-Book Tradition,” in Novità celesti e crisi del sapere: atti del convegno internazionale di studi Galileiani, ed. (Florence: Giunti Barbèra, 1984).Google Scholar
“Girolamo Borro’s Multae sunt nostrarum ignorationum causae (Ms. Vat. Ross. 1009),” in Philosophy and Humanism: Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1976).Google Scholar
Cicero Scepticus: A Study of the Influence of the ‘Academica’ in the Renaissance (Archives internationales d’histoire des idées, 52) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972).Google Scholar
“Philosophy and Science in Sixteenth-Century Italian Universities,” in The Renaissance: Essays in Interpretation, ed. , , , , , , , , and , (London: Methuen, 1982).Google Scholar
and , eds., The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method: Historical Studies (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhetoric and Philosophy in Renaissance Humanism: The Union of Eloquence and Wisdom, Petrarch to Valla (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Figuring Things Out: Figurate Problem-Solving in the Early Descartes,” in Descartes’ Natural Philosophy, ed. , , and (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
“Herbert of Cherbury Before Deism: The Early Reception of the De veritate,” The Seventeenth Century, 16 (2001).Google Scholar
“Testimony and Proof in Early-Modern England,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Francis Bacon and the Classics: The Discovery of Discovery,” in Francis Bacon’s Legacy of Texts: “The Art of Discovery Grows with Discovery,” ed. (New York: AMS, 1990).Google Scholar
and , Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
“‘A scholar and a gentleman’: The Problematic Identity of the Scientific Practitioner in Early Modern England,” History of Science, 29 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“‘The Mind Is Its Own Place’: Science and Solitude in Seventeenth-Century England,” Science in Context, 4 (1990).Google Scholar
“Cordelia’s Love: Credibility and the Social Studies of Science,” Annual Review of Sociology, 3 (1995).Google Scholar
“Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle’s Literary Technology,” Social Studies of Science, 14 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
“The Concept ‘Fact’: Legal Origins and Cultural Diffusion,” Albion, 26 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
ed. and trans., John Dee on Astronomy: Propaedeutica Aphoristica (1558 and 1568), Latin and English (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Rhetoric and Science/Rhetoric of Science/Rhetoric as Science,” in Science, Culture, and Popular Belief in Renaissance Europe, ed. , , and (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
“Francis Bacon and the Authority of Aphorism,” Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism, 11 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
History of the Royal-Society (1667).
Observations on Monsieur de Sorbier’s Voyage into England (London: John Martyn and James Allestry, 1668).Google Scholar
The History of the Royal-Society of London (London: J. Martyn and J. Allestry, 1667; facsimile repr. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958).Google Scholar
“Science and the Aphorism: Bacon’s Theory of the Philosophical Style,” Speech Monographs, 37 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Assessing the Revolution: Ideology, Language and Rhetoric in the New Philosophy of Early Modern England,” The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation, 35 (1994).Google Scholar
“Lionardo Di Capoa’s Parere (1681), A Legal Opinion on the Use of Aristotle in Medicine,” in Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, ed. and (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999).Google Scholar
Gassendi the Atomist: Advocate of History in an Age of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
“The Originality of Descartes’s Conception of Analysis as Discovery,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 60 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Question of Truth in Renaissance Rhetoric and Anthropology,” in Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric, ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar
“The ‘modern’ Theory of Natural Law,” in The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Laurentii Valle repastinatio dialectice et philosophie, ed. , 2 vols. (Padua: Antenore, 1982).Google Scholar
The Age of Two-Faced Janus: The Comets of 1577 and 1618 and the Decline of the Aristotelian World View in the Netherlands (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History, 89) (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1998).Google Scholar
“L’analogia universale: La retorica come semiotica nell’opera del Della Porta,” in Giovan Battista della Porta nell’Europa del suo tempo (Naples: Guida Editori, 1990).Google Scholar
La dialectica e la retorica dell’umanesimo: “Invenzione” e “metodo” nella cultura del XV e XVI secolo (Milan: Feltrinelli, 1968).Google Scholar
“Simon Stevin and the Geometrical method in De jure praedae,” Grotiana, n.s. 4 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Epideictic Rhetoric in Galileo’s Dialogo,” Annali dell’Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenze, 8 (1983).Google Scholar
“Rhetorical and Anti-rhetorical Tropes: On Writing the History of elocutio,” Comparative Criticism, 3 (1981).Google Scholar
“The Royal Society and English Prose Style: A Reassessment,” in Rhetoric and the Pursuit of Truth: Language Change in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. and (Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1985).Google Scholar
, “The Royal Society and English Prose Style” Werner Hüllen, “Style and Utopia: Sprat’s Demand for a Plain Style, Reconsidered,” in Papers in the History of Linguistics, ed. , , and (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1987).Google Scholar
“Pyrrhonismus historicus” und “fides historica”: Die Entwicklung der deutschen historischen Methodologie unter dem Gesichtspunkt der historischen Skepsis (Europäische Hochschulschriften, Reihe 3: Geschichte und ihre Hilfswissenschaften, 313) (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1987).Google Scholar
“Traditional Natural Philosophy,” in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. , , and , with (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Galileo and his Sources: The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo’s Science (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Vindiciae academiarum (Oxford: Thomas Robinson, 1654; facsimile repr. in Debus, Science and Education).Google Scholar
ed., Samuel Hartlib and the Advancement of Learning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
“Proof, Poetics, and Patronage: Copernicus’ Preface to De revolutionibus,” in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
“The Astronomer’s Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study,” History of Science, 18 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Francis Bacon: Induction and/or Rhetoric,” Studies in the Literary Imagination, 4 (1971).Google Scholar
“Dialogue on the connection between things and words [1677],” in Selections, ed. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1951).Google Scholar
“Discours touchant la méthode de la certitude et l’art d’inventer,” in Philosophische Schriften, ed. , 7 vols. (Berlin: Weidman, 1875–90).Google Scholar
“Projet et Essais pour arriver à quelque certitude pour finir une bonne partie des disputes et pour advancer l’ art de inventer,” in Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz, ed. (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1903).Google Scholar
“The Looking Glass of Facts: Collecting, Rhetoric and Citing the Self in the Experimental Natural Philosophy of Robert Boyle,” History of Science, 35 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Medieval ars dictaminis and the Beginnings of Humanism: A New Construction of the Problem,” Renaissance Quarterly, 35 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Methodology and Apologetics: Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal Society,” British Journal for the History of Science, 13 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De methodis libri quattuor. Liber de regressu, ed. (Bologna: Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice Bologna, 1985).Google Scholar
“Science and Rhetoric from Bacon to Hobbes: Responses to the Problem of Eloquence,” in Rhetoric 78, Proceedings of the Theory of Rhetoric: An Interdisciplinary Conference, ed. and (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Center for Advanced Studies in Language, Style, and Literary Theory, 1979).Google Scholar
, “Francis Bacon and the Historiography of Scientific Rhetoric,” Rhetoric Review, 8 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29
- Cited by