Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: Writing the History of Social Science
- PART I SCIENCES OF THE SOCIAL TO THE LATE NINETEENTH CENTURY
- PART II THE DISCIPLINES IN WESTERN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA SINCE ABOUT 1880
- 13 Changing Contours of The Social Science Disciplines
- 14 Statistics and Statistical Methods
- 15 Psychology
- 16 Economics
- 17 Political Science
- 18 Sociology
- 19 Anthropology
- 20 Geography
- 21 History and the Social Sciences
- PART III THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
- PART IV SOCIAL SCIENCE AS DISCOURSE AND PRACTICE IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LIFE
- Index
- References
15 - Psychology
from PART II - THE DISCIPLINES IN WESTERN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA SINCE ABOUT 1880
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: Writing the History of Social Science
- PART I SCIENCES OF THE SOCIAL TO THE LATE NINETEENTH CENTURY
- PART II THE DISCIPLINES IN WESTERN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA SINCE ABOUT 1880
- 13 Changing Contours of The Social Science Disciplines
- 14 Statistics and Statistical Methods
- 15 Psychology
- 16 Economics
- 17 Political Science
- 18 Sociology
- 19 Anthropology
- 20 Geography
- 21 History and the Social Sciences
- PART III THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
- PART IV SOCIAL SCIENCE AS DISCOURSE AND PRACTICE IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LIFE
- Index
- References
Summary
Psychology occupies a peculiar place among the sciences, suspended between methodological orientations derived from the physical and biological sciences and a subject matter that extends into the social and human sciences. The struggle to create a science of both subjectivity and behavior, and the related effort to develop professional practices utilizing that science’s results, provide interesting examples of both the reach and the limits of such scientific ideals as objectivity, measurability, repeatability, and cumulative knowledge acquisition. In addition, psychologists’ struggles to live by such ideals while competing with others to fulfill multiple public demands for their services illuminate both the formative impact of science on modern life, and the effects of technocratic hopes on science.
The aim of this chapter is to sketch the results of a broad shift in the historiography of psychology over the past twenty years, from the achievements of important figures and the history of psychological systems and theories to the social and cultural relations of psychological thought and practice. In the process, I hope to bring out the interrelationships of psychological research and societal practices both with one another and with prevailing cultural values and institutions in different times and places, while at the same time attempting to bring out certain common threads in this varied narrative.
One of those common threads is that the history of psychology has been a continuous struggle by multiple participants to occupy and define a sharply contested, but never clearly bounded, discursive and practical field. The emergence and institutionalization of both the discipline and the profession called “psychology” are often portrayed as acts of liberation from philosophy or medicine, but these efforts to establish scientific and professional autonomy have never completely succeeded.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 251 - 274Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
References
“Cultural Contexts and Scientific Change in Psychology: Kurt Lewin in Iowa,” American Psychologist, 47 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Emigré Psychologists after 1933: The Cultural Coding of Scientific and Professional Practices,” in Forced Migration and Scientific Change: Emigré German-Speaking Scientists and Scholars after 1933, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Kurt Gottschldt and Psychological Research in Nazi and Socialist Germany,” in Science under Socialism: East Germany in Comparative Perspective, ed. and (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
“Psychology in Twentieth-Century Germany: Science and Profession,” in German Professions, 1800–1950, ed. and (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
“Codifying the Social Scientific Style: The A.P.A. ‘Publication Manual’ as a Behaviorist Rhetoric,” in The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs, ed. , , and (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Psychologie in Wien: Sozial- und Theoriegeschichte des Wiener Psychologischen Instituts, 1922–1938 (Vienna: Wiener Universitätsverlag, 1995).Google Scholar
, A History of Psychology: Original Sources and Contemporary Research (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988)Google Scholar
“Whatever Happened to ‘Social Constructiveness’?,” in Bartlett, Culture and Cognition, ed. (London: Psychology Press, 2000).Google Scholar
and , “Experimental versus Educational Psychology: Wilhelm Wundt’s Letters to Ernst Meumann,” Psychological Research, 42 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Was macht den psychologischen Expertenstatus aus?,” Psychologie und Geschichte, 2 (1991).Google Scholar
“Philosophy and Psychology at the Sorbonne, 1885–1913,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 29 (1993)3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the United States (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Joy in Work, German Work: The National Debate, 1880–1945 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), esp. chaps. 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “The Origins of French Experimental Psychology: Experiment and Experimentalism,” History of the Human Sciences, 9:1 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Lewinian Theory as a Contemporary Systematic Framework,” in Psychology: A Study of a Science, vol. 4: General Systematic Formulations, ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959).Google Scholar
Schools as Sorters: Lewis M. Terman, Applied Psychology and the Intelligence Testing Movement, 1890–1930 (New York: New York University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
“The Mind and the Faculties: The Controversy over Primitive Mentality and the Struggle for Disciplinary Space at the Inter-war Sorbonne,” History of the Human Sciences, 13 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Standardizing the Subject: Experimental Psychologists, Introspection, and the Quest for a Technoscientific Ideal,” Technology and Culture, 34 (1993).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“Testing the Limits of Sense and Science: American Experimental Psychologists Combat Spiritualism, 1880–1920,” American Psychologist, 47 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Before Head Start: The Iowa Station and America’s Children (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1993).Google Scholar
“The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology,” American Psychologist, 12 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Project of an Experimental Social Psychology: Historical Perspectives,” Science in Context, 5 (1992).Google Scholar
“Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective,” Social Studies of Science, 22 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Theory of Will and the Science of Mind,” in The Problematic Science: Psychology in Nineteenth-Century Thought, ed. and (New York: Praeger, 1982).Google Scholar
Changing the Rules: Psychology in the Netherlands, 1900–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
ed., Völkerpsychologie – Versuch einer Neuentdeckung (Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie-Verl.-Union, 1997).Google Scholar
, “The New History of Psychology,” in The G. Stanley Hall Lecture Series, vol. 9, ed. (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1989).Google Scholar
“On the Margins: Women and the Professionalization of Psychology in the United States 1890–1940,” in Psychology in Twentieth-Century Thought and Society, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
“List of American Psychological Laboratories,” Psychological Bulletin, 26 (1929)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Professionalization of Psychology in Nazi Germany (1984), trans. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
“From Tools to Theories: Discovery in Cognitive Psychology,” Science in Context, 5 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Faktor Mensch im Krieg: Der Eintritt der Psychologie und Psychotechnik in den Krieg,” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 19 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Zur Verwendung physiologischer Analogien bei der Entstehung der experimentellen Psychologie,” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 12 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medicine, Mind and the Double Brain (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Reenchanted Science: Holism and German Science from Wilhelm II to Hitler (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
, “Psychology as a Natural Science in the Eighteenth Century,” Revue de Synthese, 115 (1994).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “Wundt and Psychology as Science: Disciplinary Transformations,” Perspectives on Science, 5 (1997)Google Scholar
, Psychology in America: A Historical Survey (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987).Google Scholar
“The Return of the Repressed: Psychology’s Problematic Relations with Psychoanalysis, 1909–1960,” American Psychologist, 47 (1992)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“Zur Herausbildung von Praxisfeldern der Psychologie bis 1933,” in Geschichte der deutschen Psychologie im 20. Jahrhundert, ed. and (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1985)Google Scholar
ed., Die Geschichtlichkeit des Seelischen: Der historische Zugang zum Gegenstand der Psychologie (Weinheim: Psychologie Verl. Union, 1986)Google Scholar
“Constructing ‘Technology’ as ‘Applied Science’: Public Rhetoric of Science and Engineering in the United States, 1880–1945,” Isis, 86 (1995)Google Scholar
and , eds., Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 20 vols. (Berlin: Dümmler, 1860–90).Google Scholar
“Telling Likely Stories: The Rhetoric of the New Psychology, 1880–1920,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 23 (1987)3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , “Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created ‘Social Climates,’” Journal of Social Psychology, 10 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Wundt, Spiritism, and the Assumptions of Science,” in Wundt Studies, ed. and (Toronto:C. J. Hogrefe, 1980)Google Scholar
Clinical versus Statistical Prediction (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1954).Google Scholar
and , “Quandary of the Quacks: The Struggle for Expert Knowledge in American Psychology, 1890–1940,” in The Estate of Social Knowledge, ed. and (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
, ed. The Rise of Experimentation in American Psychology (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
“Self-Regard and Other-Regard: Reflexive Practices in American Psychology, 1890–1940,” Science in Context, 5 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Aux origines de la psychologie universitaire en France (1870–1900): enjeux intellectuels, contexte politique, réseaux et stratégies d’alliance autor de la ‘Revue Philosophique’ de Théodule Ribot,” Annals of Science, 55 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Aux origines de la nouvelle histoire en France: l’évolution intellectuelle et la formation du champ des sciences sociales (1880–1930),” Revue de synthèse, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
ed., Freud und die akademische Psychologie: Beiträge zu einer historischen Kontroverse (Munich: Psychologie-Verlag-Union, 1989)Google Scholar
The Origins of Behaviorism: American Psychology, 1870–1920 (New York: New York University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Rebels within the Ranks: Psychologists’ Critique of Scientific Authority and Democratic Realities in New Deal America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Introduction a la Psychologie. Histoire et méthodes, 4th ed. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris, 1998).Google Scholar
ed., Rewriting the Self: Histories from the Renaissance to the Present (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
The Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue and the Origins of Modernity (New York: Basic Books, 1990).Google Scholar
“‘To Know Our Fellow Men to Do Them Good’: American Psychology’s Enduring Moral Project,” History of the Human Sciences, 8:3 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Britain on the Couch: The Popularization of Psychoanalysis in Britain 1918–1940,” Science in Context, 13 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Concepts of Mind and Behavior (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).Google Scholar
, The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society in England, 1839–1939 (London: Routledge, 1985).Google Scholar
Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power and Personhood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
G. Stanley Hall: The Psychologist as Prophet (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972)Google Scholar
“Authoritarianism from Berlin to Berkeley: On Social Psychology and History,” Journal of Social Issues, 42 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Organizing for the Kingdom of Behavior: Academic Battles and Organizational Policies in the Twenties,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 21 (1985)3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“After Binet: French Intelligence Testing, 1900–1950,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28 (1992).3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassesment of the Alliance (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Inhibition: History and Meaning in the Sciences of Mind and Brain (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).Google Scholar
, ed., An Education in Psychology: James McKeen Cattell’s Journal and Letters from Germany and England, 1880–1888 (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981)Google Scholar
“Origins and Early Years of the American Psychological Association, 1890–1906,” American Psychologist, 47 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Gestalt Psychologists in Behaviorist America,” American Historical Review, 89 (1984).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ed., Psychological Testing and American Society (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
“‘Psychological Man’ and Human Subjectivity in Historical Perspective,” History of the Human Sciences, 4 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Die psychologische Arbeit des 19. Jahrhunderts,” Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie, 2 (1900).Google Scholar
Crowds, Psychology and Politics, 1871–1899 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
“The American ‘Colonization’ of Northwest European Social Psychology after World War II,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 33 (1997).3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Practical Language of American Intellect,” History of the Human Sciences, 4 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Measuring the Mind: Education and Psychology in England, c. 1860–c. 1990 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Measuring Minds: Henry Herbert Goddard and the Origins of American Mental Testing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by