Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- PART I WORKERS AND PLACES
- PART II ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION
- 10 Geology
- 11 Paleontology
- 12 Zoology
- 13 Botany
- 14 Evolution
- 15 Anatomy, Histology, and Cytology
- 16 Embryology
- 17 Microbiology
- 18 Physiology
- 19 Pathology
- PART III NEW OBJECTS AND IDEAS
- PART IV SCIENCE AND CULTURE
- Index
- References
12 - Zoology
from PART II - ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- PART I WORKERS AND PLACES
- PART II ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION
- 10 Geology
- 11 Paleontology
- 12 Zoology
- 13 Botany
- 14 Evolution
- 15 Anatomy, Histology, and Cytology
- 16 Embryology
- 17 Microbiology
- 18 Physiology
- 19 Pathology
- PART III NEW OBJECTS AND IDEAS
- PART IV SCIENCE AND CULTURE
- Index
- References
Summary
Zoology, the study of the animal kingdom, is no longer seen as a coherent branch of science. The specialization of the twentieth century has seen zoology’s territory divided among a host of separate disciplines. But in the nineteenth century that specialization was only beginning, and many naturalists would still have called themselves “zoologists,” their primary concern being to gain an understanding of the animal kingdom as a whole, its diversity of structure and function, and the ways in which its component species were related.
Exploration and the description of new species continued to drive home the sheer diversity of nature: Zoologists searched for the “natural system” of relationships but disagreed over how to uncover it. Philosophical naturalists started from a priori assumptions and abstract principles, searching for unity and symmetry in the array of natural forms. Many were influenced by various forms of idealist philosophy proclaiming that nature was the manifestation of a rational Mind. Others adopted a more empirical approach, starting from the study of particular cases; these naturalists were more likely to include information on the habits, distribution, and ecological relationships of species. There were constant disagreements over the relative significance of “form” (internal biological constraints) and “function” (adaptation to the environment) in determining the structure of individual species. The advent of evolutionism transformed biologists’ ideas on the nature of the relationships between species, although the theory’s impact on practice is less easy to define.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 205 - 224Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, Life Science in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
, The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades before Darwin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987);Google Scholar
, Life’s Splendid Drama: Evolutionary Biology and the Reconstruction of Life’s Ancestry, 1860–1940 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), chap. 8.Google Scholar
, The Secular Ark: Studies in the History of Biogeography (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds., The Correspondence of Charles Darwin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), vol. 2, 320.Google Scholar
, “‘Biology’ and the Life Sciences: A Historiographical Contribution,” History of Science, 26 (1988).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “Morphology and the Evolutionary Synthesis,” in The Evolutionary Synthesis, ed. and (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980);Google Scholar
, Georges Cuvier, Zoologist (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Morphology between Type Concept and Descent Theory,” Journal of the History of Medicine, 31 (1976).Google ScholarPubMed
, The Age of Lamarck: Evolutionary Theories in France, 1790–1830 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988);Google Scholar
, The Formation of Vegetable Mould, Through the Action of Worms, with Observations on their Habits (London: John Murray, 1881).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed., The Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. Beagle, 5 pts. (London: Smith, Elder, 1838–43).Google Scholar
, “In Search of the Natural System: Problems of Zoological Classification in Victorian Britain,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 4 (1982).Google Scholar
, “Hugh Edwin Strickland (1811–53) on Affinities and Analogies: or, The Case of the Missing Key,” Ideas and Production, 7 (1987).Google Scholar
, T. H. Huxley’s Place in Natural Science (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984);Google Scholar
, “A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Carl Gegenbaur, Ernst Haeckel, the Vertebral Theory of the Skull, and the Survival of Richard Owen,” Journal of the History of Biology, 28 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, From Here to Eternity: Ernst Haeckel and Scientific Faith (Goettingen: Van den hoek and Ruprecht, 2005);Google Scholar
, “The Dinosaur Connection: A Reinterpretation of T. H. Huxley’s Evolutionary View,” Journal of the History of Biology, 15 (1982);Google Scholar
, trans. M. T. Ghiselin, “The Origin of Vertebrates and the Principle of Succession of Functions,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 16 (1993).Google Scholar
, A Classification of Vertebrates, Recent and Extinct (London: A. and C. Black, 1875).Google Scholar
, Grundzuege der vergleichenden Anatomie, 1st ed. (Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelman, 1859), 2nd ed. (Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelman, 1870).Google Scholar
, Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).Google Scholar
, Johannes Mueller: Das Leben des rheinischen Naturforschers (Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1924).Google Scholar
, “Fragments Relating to Philosophical Zoology, Selected from the Works of K. E. von Baer,” Taylor’s Scientific Memoirs, Natural History, 3 (1853).Google Scholar
, “On the Use of the Term Homology in Modern Zoology, and the Distinction between Homogenic and Homoplastic,” Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6 (1870).Google Scholar
, “Johannes Muellers Rezeption der Zellenlehre in seinem ‘Handbuch der Physiologie der Menschen’,” Medizinhistorisches Journal, 13 (1978).Google Scholar
, “Geschichte der vergleichenden Anatomie,” in Handbuch der Anatomie der Wirbelthiere, ed. et al., 7 vols. (Berlin: Urban und Schwarzenberg, 1931–8), vol. 1;Google Scholar
, Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991);Google Scholar
, “Species, Rules and Meaning: The Politics of Language and the Ends of Definitions in 19th-Century Natural History,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 27 (1996);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Towards Stability in the Names of Animals: A History of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1895–1995 (London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, 1995).Google Scholar
, “Considérations sur quelques principes relatifs à la classification naturelle des animaux,” Annales des sciences naturelles, 3 (1844).Google Scholar
, Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
, “Representations of the Natural System in the 19th Century,” in Picturing Knowledge, ed. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996);Google Scholar
, “The Influence of Karl Ernst von Baer’s Embryology, 1828–1859,” Journal of the History of Biology, 9 (1976).Google ScholarPubMed
, , and , eds., The American Development of Biology (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Darwin, Haeckel et les francais,” in De Darwin au darwinisme: Science et idéologie, ed. (Paris: J. Vrin, 1983);Google Scholar
, The Natural Conditions of Existence as They Affect Animal Life (London: Kegan Paul, 1881).Google Scholar
, ed., Richard Owen: The Hunterian Lectures in Comparative Anatomy (London: Natural History Museum, 1992).Google Scholar
, “Darwin’s Invertebrate Program, 1826–1836: Preconditions for Transformism,” in The Darwinian Heritage, ed. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
, “Die idealistische Morphologie und ihre Wirkung,” Medizinhistorisches Journal, 15 (1980);Google Scholar
, “Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere von Gegenbaur bis heute,” Verhandlungen der deutschen zoologischen Gesesselschaft Jena (1966).Google Scholar
, “Observations upon the Affinities and Analogies of Organized Beings,” Magazine of Natural History, 4 (1840),Google Scholar
, “On the Method of Discovering the Natural System in Zoology and Botany,” Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6 (1840–1), at p. 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Geschichte der Zoologie und der zoologischen Anstalten in Jena, 1779–1919 (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1959);Google Scholar
, Historisches Bewusstsein in der Naturwisssenschaft von der Aufklaerung bis zum Positivismus (Freiburg: Alber, 1979).Google Scholar
, “A Historical Consideration of the Siphonophores,” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 73 (1971–2).Google Scholar
, Starfish, Jellyfish, and the Order of Life (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by