Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- PART I DISCIPLINING MUSIC THEORY
- PART II SPECULATIVE TRADITIONS
- 4 Greek music theory
- 5 The transmission of ancient music theory into the Middle Ages
- 6 Medieval canonics
- 7 Tuning and temperament
- 8 The role of harmonics in the scientific revolution
- 9 From acoustics to Tonpsychologie
- 10 Music theory and mathematics
- PART III REGULATIVE TRADITIONS
- PART IV DESCRIPTIVE TRADITIONS
- Index of authors
- Index of subjects
- References
9 - From acoustics to Tonpsychologie
from PART II - SPECULATIVE TRADITIONS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- PART I DISCIPLINING MUSIC THEORY
- PART II SPECULATIVE TRADITIONS
- 4 Greek music theory
- 5 The transmission of ancient music theory into the Middle Ages
- 6 Medieval canonics
- 7 Tuning and temperament
- 8 The role of harmonics in the scientific revolution
- 9 From acoustics to Tonpsychologie
- 10 Music theory and mathematics
- PART III REGULATIVE TRADITIONS
- PART IV DESCRIPTIVE TRADITIONS
- Index of authors
- Index of subjects
- References
Summary
The rise of Tonpsychologie as a scientific discipline in the nineteenth century was a key moment in the history of music theory. It revived topics hitherto situated in the venerable, although largely enfeebled, study of speculative harmonics, and at the same time prefigured future directions for research in music perception. In the final third of the century, this research field underwent two major epistemological shifts that revolved around the German polymaths Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–94) and Carl Stumpf (1848–1936). Both of these scientists were accomplished amateur musicians; both were avidly interested in music theory. Using experimental methods to study pitch organization and the physiology of hearing, they tried to answer age-old ontological questions of musica theorica: what are the origins and nature of musical sound, consonance, harmony, and scales? In so doing, they offered fresh perspectives that can be appreciated only by distinguishing their individual viewpoints and by reviewing the long prehistory of their work.
The scientific revolution of the seventeenth century gave birth to the experimental/empirical methods of natural science and stirred interest in the physical basis of pitch organization. Physical acoustics fascinated investigators from Mersenne to Helmholtz and largely replaced the dominating mode of speculative, numerical inquiry. Questions about harmony and about consonance and dissonance were now evaluated acoustically rather than by reference to canonics. By the middle of the nineteenth century it became apparent that experimental methods could be applied not only to the physics of music but also to the physiology of hearing and the psychology of perception.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory , pp. 246 - 271Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1976; Holism and the Quest for Objectivity, Cambridge University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Introduction to , Harmonics or the Philosophy of Musical Sounds (1749), facs. New York, Da Capo Press, 1966, pp. –xiGoogle Scholar
“Shaping a Tradition: Experimentalism Begins,” in Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology, ed. , Orlando, Academic Press, 1985Google Scholar
A History of Experimental Psychology, 2nd edn., New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950Google Scholar
Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1942Google Scholar
“Describing the Perception of Tonality in Music: A Proposal for a Theory of Intervallic Rivalry,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 6 (1989)Google Scholar
and , The Evolution of Dynamics: Vibration Theory from 1687 to 1742, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Sensory Theories of Musical Consonance,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entdeckungen über die Theorie des Klanges (1787), trans. in Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical Development, ed. , Stroudsburg, PA, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973Google Scholar
“Eighteenth-Century Science and the Corps Sonore: The Scientific Background to Rameau’s Principle of Harmony,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 31 (1987)Google Scholar
“Sensus, Ratio, and Phthongos: Mattheson’s Theory of Tone Perception,” in Musical Transformation and Musical Intuition, ed. and , Boston, Ovenbird Press, 1994Google Scholar
Quantifying Music: The Science of Music at the First Stage of the Scientific Revolution, 1580–1650, Dordrecht, D. Reidel, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Introduction: Helmholtz in the History of Scientific Method,” in Hermann von Helmholtz: Epistemological Writings, ed. and , Dordrecht, Reidel, 1977Google Scholar
“Letter to Joseph Louis Lagrange, from Berlin” (1759), trans. in Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical Development, ed. , Stroudsburg, A. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973Google Scholar
Tentamen novae theoriae musicae, St. Petersburg, Academiae Scientarium, 1739; facs. New York, Broude, 1968Google Scholar
, “Sur la determination d’un son fixe” (1700), in Joseph Sauveur, Collected Writings on Musical Acoustics (Paris 1700–1713), ed. , Utrecht, Diapason Press, 1984Google Scholar
Two New Sciences; including Centers of Gravity and Force of Percussion (1638), trans. , Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1974Google Scholar
The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution, New York, Basic Books, 1985Google Scholar
Music, Science and Natural Magic in Seventeenth-Century England, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1999Google Scholar
Listening, An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1989Google Scholar
Die Natur der Harmonik und der Metrik, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1853; trans. as The Nature of Harmony and Metre, London, S. Sonnenschein, 1888Google Scholar
“On the Physiological Causes of Harmony in Music” (1857), in Helmholtz on Perception: Its Physiology and Development, ed. and , New York, J. Wiley, 1968Google Scholar
“On the Rate of Transmission of the Nerve Impulse” (1850), trans. in Readings in the History of Psychology, ed. , New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1948Google Scholar
Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologischer Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik (1863), 4th edn., Braunschweig, F. Vieweg, 1877; trans. as On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, 2nd edn., London, Longman and Green, 1885; reprint New York, Dover, 1954Google Scholar
Handbuch der physiologischen Optik, 3 vols., Hamburg and Leipzig, L. Voss, 1856–67, 3rd edn., 1909–11; trans. as Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3 vols., Rochester, NY, Optical Society of America, 1924–25; reprint New York, Dover, 1962Google Scholar
Origins in Acoustics: The Science of Sound from Antiquity to the Age of Newton, Yale University Press, 1978Google Scholar
Die Kunst des reinen Satzes, Berlin, 1771–79; partial trans. and as The Art of Strict Musical Composition, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1982Google Scholar
Compositional Theory in The Eighteenth Century, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1992Google Scholar
“The Story of Acoustics,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39 (1966)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harmonie universelle, Paris, Cramoisy, 1636–37; facs. Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1963 and 1986; Book IV trans. as Harmonie universelle: The Books on Instruments, The Hague, M. Nijhoff, 1957Google Scholar
Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne, ed. et al., 10 vols., Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1945–67Google Scholar
Hugo Riemann’s Theory of Harmony: A Study and History of Music Theory, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1977Google Scholar
“The Specific Energies of Nerves” (1838), trans. in Readings in the History of Psychology, ed. , New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1948Google Scholar
and , Historical Introduction to Modern Psychology, 3rd edn., New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972Google Scholar
Cursory Notes of Musicke (c. 1698–1703): A Physical, Psychological and Critical Theory, ed. and , Kensington, Australia, Unisearch Limited, University of New South Wales, 1986Google Scholar
“On the Definition of a Tone with the Associated Theory of the Siren and Similar Sound Producing Devices” (1843), trans. in Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical Development, ed. , Stroudsburg, PA. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973Google Scholar
Œuvres de Descartes, vol. x, ed. and , Paris, L. Cerf, 1908; facs. Strasbourg, Heitz, 1965 and New York, Broude, 1968Google Scholar
“Scientific Empiricism,” in Seventeenth Century Science in the Arts, ed. , Princeton University Press, 1961Google Scholar
and , “Consonance” in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, ed. , 20 vols., London, Macmillan; Washington, D.C., Grove’s Dictionaries of Music, 1980, vol. VIGoogle Scholar
Code de musique pratique, Paris, Imprimerie royale, 1760; facs. New York, Broude, 1965Google Scholar
and , “The Perception of Musical Tones,” in The Psychology of Music, ed. , San Diego, Academic Press, 1982Google Scholar
Introduction to Joseph Sauveur: Collected Writings on Musical Acoustics (Paris 1700–1713), ed. , Utrecht, Diapason Press, 1984Google Scholar
“Zur Theorie der Konsonanz und Dissonanz” (1901), in Präludien und Studien, vol. III, Leipzig, H. Seemann, 1901; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1967Google Scholar
and , “Exploration of Timbre by Analysis and Synthesis,” in The Psychology of Music, ed. , San Diego, Academic Press, 1982Google Scholar
“A Discourse concerning the Musical Notes on the Trumpet, and the Trumpet Marine, and of the Defects of the Same,” Philosophical Transcriptions of the Royal Society of London 16 (1692)Google Scholar
“Ernst Kurth’s Die Voraussetzungen der theoretischen Harmonik and the Beginnings of Music Psychology,” Theoria 4 (1989)Google Scholar
“Application des sons harmoniques à la composition des jeux d’orgues” (1702), in Joseph Sauveur: Collected Writings on Musical Acoustics (Paris 1700–1713), ed. , Utrecht, Diapason Press, 1984Google Scholar
“Système général des intervalles des sons, et son application à tous les systèmes et à tous les instrumens de musique” (1701), in Joseph Sauveur: Collected Writings on Musical Acoustics (Paris 1700–1713), ed. , Utrecht, Diapason Press, 1984Google Scholar
“Sensibilité de l’ouïe” (1830), trans. in Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical Development, ed. , Stroudsburg, PA, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973Google Scholar
Spiegel der Orgelmacher und Organisten, Mainz, P. Schöffer, 1511; facs. with trans. by , Buren, Netherlands, F. Knuf, 1980Google Scholar
and , A History of Modern Psychology, 5th edn., New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992Google Scholar
Harmonics or the Philosophy of Musical Sounds (1749), facs. New York, Da Capo Press, 1966Google Scholar
and , “Psychology of Music” in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd edn., ed. , 29 vols., London, Macmillan, 2001, vol. xxGoogle Scholar
“Carl Stumpf,” in Die Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen, ed. , Leipzig, F. Meiner, 1924Google Scholar
“Hermann von Helmholtz and the New Psychology,” trans. in Psychological Review 2 (1895)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Konsonanz und Konkordanz,” in Beiträge zur Akustik und Musikwissenschaft, vol. VI, ed. , Leipzig, J. A. Barth, 1911Google Scholar
Tonpsychologie, 2 vols., Leipzig, S. Hirzel, 1883–90; reprint Hilversum, F. Knuf, 1965Google Scholar
“Concept of Musical Consonance: A Link between Music and Psychoacoustics,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 1 (1984)Google Scholar
“The Rational Mechanics of Flexible or Elastic Bodies, 1638–1788,” in Leonhardi Euleri Opera Omnia, Ser. 2/X–XI, Zurich, O. Füssli, 1960Google Scholar
“Sensation of Tone, Perception of Sound, and Empiricism; Helmholtz’s Physiological Acoustics,” in Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundation of Nineteenth-Century Science, ed. , Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993Google Scholar
“Dr Wallis’s Letter to the Publisher, concerning a new Musical Discovery,” Philosophical Transcriptions of the Royal Society of London 12 (1677)Google Scholar
“Helmholtz and His Continuing Influence,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 1 (1984)Google Scholar
- 15
- Cited by