Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:57:29.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Endometrial Cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Laurie J. Mckenzie
Affiliation:
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Denise R. Nebgen
Affiliation:
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Get access

Summary

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, and is rising in both incidence and associated mortality. In 2023 an estimated 66,000 new cases of uterine cancer will be diagnosed in the United States and over 400,000 women will be affected globally. Risk factors for the development of endometrial cancer include advancing age, obesity and and conditions associated with metabolic syndrome, such as diabetes. Obesity is the most important risk factor for endometrial cancer, and as rates of obesity rise, so does the incidence of endometrial cancer. Surgery is the mainstay of initial management of endometrial cancer, and staging now includes sentinel lymph-node mapping, along with a minimally invasive surgical approach for removal of the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries. Fortunately, 75% of patients with endometrial cancer have International Federation of Gynecologic and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I disease, and 5-year overall survival rates exceed 90%. High-risk stage I patients are often recommended to receive adjuvant therapy and women with locally advanced disease and/or distant disease typically require multimodality treatment that can include some combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Endometrial cancer is more often being detected in young obese women. In women of childbearing age in whom endometrial cancer is diagnosed and wish to retain their ability to have children, a conservative alternative to hysterectomy for these women is the use of oral progestin or a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS).

Type
Chapter
Information
Caring for the Female Cancer Patient
Gynecologic Considerations
, pp. 271 - 283
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lu, K. H., Broaddus, R. R. Endometrial cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(21):2053–64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMRA1514010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renehan, A. G., Tyson, M., Egger, M., Heller, R. F., Zwahlen, M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. The Lancet. 2008;371(9612);569–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60269-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Fuchs, H. E., Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2022;72(1):733. https://doi.org/10.3322/CAAC.21708Google Scholar
Jordan, L. B., Abdul-Kader, M., Al-Nafussi, A. Uterine serous papillary carcinoma: Histopathologic changes within the female genital tract. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer: Official Journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society. 2001;11(4):283–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1525-1438.2001.011004283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slomovitz, B. M., Burke, T. W., Eifel, P. J., et al. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC): A single institution review of 129 cases. Gynecologic Oncology. 2003;91(3):463–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carcangiu, M. L., Chambers, J. T. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: A study on 108 cases with emphasis on the prognostic significance of associated endometrioid carcinoma, absence of invasion, and concomitant ovarian carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 1992;47(3):298305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(92)90130-BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirisano, F. D., Robboy, S. J., Dodge, R. K., et al. Epidemiologic and surgicopathologic findings of papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancer when compared to endometrioid carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 1999;74(3):385–94. https://doi.org/10.1006/GYNO.1999.5505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, C. A., Cheung, M. K., Osann, K., et al. Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 2006;94(5):642–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.BJC.6603012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Z., Ogata, S., Tamura, G., et al. Carcinosarcomas (malignant mullerian mixed tumors) of the uterus and ovary: A genetic study with special reference to histogenesis. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2003;22(4):368–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pgp.0000092134.88121.56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sreenan, J. J., Hart, W. R. Carcinosarcomas of the female genital tract. A pathologic study of 29 metastatic tumors: Further evidence for the dominant role of the epithelial component and the conversion theory of histogenesis. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 1995;19(6):666–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199506000-00007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, E., Lillemoe, T. J., Twiggs, L. B., Perrone, T. Malignant mixed müllerian tumor versus high-grade endometrial carcinoma and aggressive variants of endometrial carcinoma: A comparative analysis of survival. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology: Official Journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. 1995;14(1):3944. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-199501000-00007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartori, E., Bazzurini, L., Gadducci, A., et al. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathological multicenter CTF study. Gynecologic Oncology. 1997;67(1): 70–5. https://doi.org/10.1006/GYNO.1997.4827CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaidya, A. P., Horowitz, N. S., Oliva, E., Halpern, E. F., Duska, L. R. Uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumors should not be included in studies of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 2006;103(2):684–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2006.05.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemminki, K., Bermejo, J. L., Granström, C. Endometrial cancer: Population attributable risks from reproductive, familial and socioeconomic factors. European Journal of Cancer. 2005;41(14):2155–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJCA.2005.03.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Møller, P., Seppälä, T. T., Bernstein, I., et al. Cancer risk and survival in path_MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: A report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Gut. 2018;67(7):1306–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/GUTJNL-2017-314057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, N., Yendluri, V., Wenham, R. M. The molecular biology of endometrial cancer and the implications for pathogenesis, classification, and targeted therapies. Cancer Control: Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. 2009;16(1):813. https://doi.org/10.1177/107327480901600102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Møller, P., Seppälä, T. T., Bernstein, I., et al. Cancer risk and survival in path-MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: A report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Gut. 2018b;67(7):1306–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/GUTJNL-2017-314057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarnio, M., Sankila, R., Pukkala, E., et al. Cancer risk in mutation carriers of dna-mismatch-repair genes. J. Cancer. 1999;81:214–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990412)81:2Google ScholarPubMed
Delin, J. B., Miller, D. S., Coleman, R. L. Other primary malignancies in patients with uterine corpus malignancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;190(5):1429–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.075CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, N. A. J., Morris, J., Green, K., et al. Association of mismatch repair mutation with age at cancer onset in lynch syndrome implications for stratified surveillance strategies. JAMA Oncology. 2017;3(12):E1E5. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMAONCOL.2017.0619CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampel, H., Frankel, W., Panescu, J., et al. Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients. Cancer Research. 2006;66(15):7810–17. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, K. H., Schorge, J. O., Rodabaugh, K. J., et al. Prospective determination of prevalence of Lynch syndrome in young women with endometrial cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25(33):5158–64. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resnick, K. E., Hampel, H., Fishel, R., Coh, D. E. Current and emerging trends in Lynch syndrome identification in women with endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2009;114(1):128–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2009.03.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmeler, K. M., Lynch, H. T., Chen, L., et al. Prophylactic surgery to reduce the risk of gynecologic cancer in the Lynch syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;354(3):261–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA052627CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinton, L. A., Berman, M. L., Mortel, R., et al. Reproductive, menstrual, and medical risk factors for endometrial cancer: Results from a case-control study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992;167(5):1317–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91709-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanford, J. L., Brinton, L. A., Hoover, R. N., et al. Oral contraceptives and endometrial cancer: Do other risk factors modify the association? International Journal of Cancer. 1993;54(2):243–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJC.2910540214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, L., Deapen, D., Cerhan, J. R., et al. Tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer and endometrial cancer risk. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1999;91(19): 1654–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/JNCI/91.19.1654CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, B., Costantino, J. P., Wickerham, D. L., et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1998;90(18):1371–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/JNCI/90.18.1371CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swerdlow, A. J., Jones, M. E., Brewster, D. H., et al. Tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer and risk of endometrial cancer: A case-control study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2005;97(5):375–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/JNCI/DJI057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCluggage, W. G. My approach to the interpretation of endometrial biopsies and curettings. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2006;59(8):801–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/JCP.2005.029702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitao, M. M., Kehoe, S., Barakat, R. R., et al. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 2009;113(1):105–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2008.12.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H., Dubinsky, T., Andreotti, R. F., et al. ACR appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment evaluation and follow-up of endometrial cancer of the uterus. Ultrasound Quarterly. 2011;27(2):139–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0B013E31821B6F73Google ScholarPubMed
Duk, J. M., Aalders, J. G., Fleuren, G. J., de Bruijn, H. W. A. CA 125: A useful marker in endometrial carcinoma. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1986;155(5):1097–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(86)90358-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, N. A. J., Snowsill, T., McKenzie, E., Monahan, K. J., Nebgen, D. Should women with Lynch syndrome be offered gynaecological cancer surveillance? BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 2021;374. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N2020Google ScholarPubMed
Walker, J. L., Piedmonte, M. R., Spirtos, N. M., et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30(7):695700. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, J. W., Kauderer, J., Hutson, A., et al. GOG 244-The lymphedema and gynecologic cancer (LEG) study: Incidence and risk factors in newly diagnosed patients. Gynecologic Oncology. 2020;156(2):467–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2019.10.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holloway, R. W., Abu-Rustum, N. R., Backes, F. J., et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations. Gynecologic Oncology. 2017;146(2):405–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2017.05.027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, D. S., Filiaci, V. L., Mannel, R. S., et al. Carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced endometrial cancer: Final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a phase III trial (NRG Oncology/GOG0209). Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2020;38(33):3841–50. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Malley, D. M., Bariani, G. M., Cassier, P. A., et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high advanced endometrial cancer: Results from the KEYNOTE-158 Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2022;40(7):752–61. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01874Google ScholarPubMed
Makker, V., Colombo, N., Casado Herráez, A., et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2022;386(5):437–48. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA2108330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eskander, R. N., Sill, M. W., Beffa, L., et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2023;388(23):2159–70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA2302312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirza, M. R., Chase, D. M., Slomovitz, B. M., et al. Dostarlimab for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2023;388(23):2145–58. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA2216334CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Getz, G., Gabriel, S. B., Cibulskis, K., et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497(7447):6773. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12113Google Scholar
Keys, H. M., Roberts, J. A., Brunetto, V. L., et al. A phase III trial of surgery with and without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gyn Onc. 2004;92:744–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creutzberg, C., Nout, R. A., Lybeert, M. L. M., et al. Fifteen-year radiotherapy outcomes of the randomized PORTEC-1 trial for endometrial carcinoma. Int J RAdiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:631–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wortman, B. G., Creutzberg, C. L., Putter, H., et al. Ten-year results of the PORTEC-2 trial for high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma: Improving patient selection for adjuvant therapy. British Journal of Cancer. 2018;119(9):1067–74. doi:10.1038/s41416-018-0310-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nout, R. A., Smit, V. T., Potter, H, et al. Vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic external beam radiotherapy for patients with endometrial cancer of high-intermediate risk (PORTEC 2), opem-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial. Lancet. 2010; 2010:816–23.Google Scholar
De Boer, S. M., Powell, M. E., Mileshkin, L., et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versu radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): Patterns of recurrence and ad hoc survival analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;9:1273–58.Google Scholar
Matei, D., Filiaci, V., Randall, M., et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation for locally advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;13:2317–26.Google Scholar
Klopp, A., Yeung, A. R., Deshmukh, S., et al. Patient-reported toxicity during pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy: NRG Oncoloyg- RTOG 1203. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2538–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westin, S. N., Fellman, B., Sun, C. C., et al. Prospective phase II trial of levonorgestrel intrauterine device: Nonsurgical approach for complex atypical hyperplasia and early-stage endometrial cancer. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;224(2):191.e1–191.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJOG.2020.08.032CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, A. L., Dornfeld-Finke, J. M., Banks, H. W., Davey, D. D., Modesitt, S. C. Is cytologic screening an effective surveillance method for detection of vaginal recurrence of uterine cancer? Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;107(1):71–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000194206.38105.C8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barakat, R. R., Bundy, B. N., Spirtos, N. M., et al. Randomized double-blind trial of estrogen replacement therapy versus placebo in stage I or II endometrial cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24(4):587–92. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillian, N., Motter, A., Frederick, P., et al. (2021). NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2022 Uterine Neoplasms Current NCCN Guidelines. www.nccn.orgGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×