Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:14:31.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 20 - Pelvic Mass and Ovarian Cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Laurie J. Mckenzie
Affiliation:
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Denise R. Nebgen
Affiliation:
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Get access

Summary

Masses of the ovary, fallopian tube, or surrounding tissues are common and found in up to 35% of premenopausal patients and 17% of postmenopausal patients. They are often diagnosed incidentally on physical examination or at the time of pelvic imaging. The differential diagnosis is broad and includes both benign and malignant lesions, as well as gynecologic and non-gynecologic lesions. The patient’s age, family history, physical exam, imaging findings, and serum marker levels can aid with narrowing the differential. Risk factors for ovarian cancer include age, family history of ovarian cancer or genetic predisposition for ovarian cancer, nulliparity, early menarche, late menopause, and endometriosis. Management aims include identifying need for emergent surgery, identifying malignancy, managing symptoms, and preserving fertility when appropriate. Management options for pelvic masses include expectant management, surveillance, and surgical management. While minimally invasive surgery is often the preferred surgical approach for removal of an adnexal mass, open surgery may be required for larger masses or those concerning for malignancy. Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic malignancy after uterine carcinoma and is the deadliest gynecologic cancer in the United States. Approximately 95% of ovarian cancer arise from the epithelial cells and include high grade serous, low grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous carcinoma. Most patients have advanced staged disease at the time of ovarian cancer diagnosis. While surgery alone can cure most patients with early-stage disease, most patients present with advanced stage disease and will require a combination of both surgery and chemotherapy. The standard chemotherapy regimen includes a combination of platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy. Five-year overall survival rates are 89% for stage I, 71% for stage II, 41% for stage III, and 20% for stage IV disease.

Type
Chapter
Information
Caring for the Female Cancer Patient
Gynecologic Considerations
, pp. 346 - 361
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borgfeldt, C., Andolf, E., Transvaginal sonographic ovarian findings in a random sample of women 25-40 years old. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;13(5):345–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlik, E. J., Ueland, F. R., Miller, R. W., et al., Frequency and disposition of ovarian abnormalities followed with serial transvaginal ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):210–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmerman, D., Van, Calster B., Testa, A., et al., Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):424–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roman, L. D., Muderspach, L. I., Stein, S. M., et al., Pelvic examination, tumor marker level, and gray-scale and Doppler sonography in the prediction of pelvic cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):493500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Wagle, N. S., et al., Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. Practice Bulletin No. 174: Evaluation and Management of Adnexal Masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5):e210–e226.Google Scholar
Howlader, N., Noone, A. M., Krapcho, M., et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2013. 2016; http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013.Google Scholar
Howlader, N., Noone, A. M., Krapcho, M., et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. 2019; https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/ based on November 2018 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2019.Google Scholar
Society A. C. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2016. 2016; www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-047079.pdf.Google Scholar
Hall, M. J., Obeid, E. I., Schwartz, S. C., et al., Genetic testing for hereditary cancer predisposition: BRCA1/2, Lynch syndrome, and beyond. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140(3):565–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D., Narod, S., et al., Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, D., Easton, D. F., Stratton, M., et al., Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(3):676–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, M. C., Marks, J. H., Mandell, J. B. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science. 2003;302(5645):643–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancaster, J. M., Powell, C. B., Chen, L. M., et al., Society of Gynecologic Oncology statement on risk assessment for inherited gynecologic cancer predispositions. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136(1):37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinton, L. A., Lamb, E. J., Moghissi, K. S., et al., Ovarian cancer risk associated with varying causes of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(2):405–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wentzensen, N., Poole, E. M., Trabert, B., et al., Ovarian cancer risk factors by histologic subtype: An analysis From the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(24):2888–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, A. H., Pearce, C. L., Tseng, C. C., et al., African Americans and Hispanics Remain at Lower Risk of Ovarian Cancer Than Non-Hispanic Whites after Considering Nongenetic Risk Factors and Oophorectomy Rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24(7):1094–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penninkilampi, R., Eslick, G. D., Perineal talc use and ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2018;29(1):41–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, K. M., Tworoger, S. S., Harris, H. R., et al., Association of powder use in the genital area with risk of ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2020;323(1):4959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzuto, I., Behrens, R. F., Smith, L. A., Risk of ovarian cancer in women treated with ovarian stimulating drugs for infertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(8):CD008215.Google ScholarPubMed
Givens, V., Mitchell, G. E., Harraway-Smith, C., et al., Diagnosis and management of adnexal masses. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80(8):815–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Bulun, S. E., Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):268–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oltmann, S. C., Fischer, A., Barber, R., et al., Cannot exclude torsion–a 15-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(6):1212–6; discussion 1217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, B. V., Ference, E. H., Zurakowski, D., et al., The clinical presentation and surgical management of adnexal torsion in the pediatric and adolescent population. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25(2):109–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landers, D. V., Sweet, R. L. Tubo-ovarian abscess: contemporary approach to management. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5(5):876–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lareau, S. M., Beigi, R. H. Pelvic inflammatory disease and tubo-ovarian abscess. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2008;22(4):693708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 280. The role of the generalist obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(6):1413–16.Google Scholar
Schumer, S. T., Cannistra, S. A. Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(6):1180–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varras, M., Vasilakaki, T., Skafida, E., et al., Clinical, ultrasonographic, computed tomography and histopathological manifestations of ovarian steroid cell tumour, not otherwise specified: our experience of a rare case with female virilisation and review of the literature. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27(6):412–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, J., Diagnosis and management of the adnexal mass. Am Fam Physician. 1998;57(10):2471–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Meden, H., Fattahi-Meibodi, A. CA 125 in benign gynecological conditions. Int J Biol Markers. 1998;13(4):231–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellstrom, I., Hellstrom, K. E. SMRP and HE4 as biomarkers for ovarian carcinoma when used alone and in combination with CA-125 and/or each other. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;622:1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bozkurt, M., Yumru, A. E., Aral, I Evaluation of the importance of the serum levels of CA-125, CA15-3, CA-19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen and alpha fetoprotein for distinguishing benign and malignant adnexal masses and contribution of different test combinations to diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2013;34(6):540–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Dyckhoff, G., Warta, R., Gonnermann, A., et al., Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in saliva: possible preoperative marker of malignancy in parotid tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145(5):772–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S., Park, B. K., Seo, J. H., et al., Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 elevation without evidence of malignant or pancreatobiliary diseases. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, S., Dasgupta, A., Kar, K. Comparison of urinary and serum CA 19-9 as markers of early stage urothelial carcinoma. Int Braz J Urol. 2013;39(5):631–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagshawe, K. D. Choriocarcinoma. A model for tumour markers. Acta Oncol. 1992;31(1):99106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boggess, J. F., Soules, M. R., Goff, B. A., et al., Serum inhibin and disease status in women with ovarian granulosa cell tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64(1):64–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dallenbach, P., Bonnefoi, H., Pelte, M. F., et al., Yolk sac tumours of the ovary: An update. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32(10):1063–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pressley, R. H., Muntz, H. G., Falkenberry, S., et al., Serum lactic dehydrogenase as a tumor marker in dysgerminoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;44(3):281–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmerman, D., Ameye, L., Fischerova, D., et al., Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: Prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ. 2010;341:c6839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaijser, J., Sayasneh, A., Van, Hoorde K., et al., Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):449–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreotti, R. F., Timmerman, D., Benacerraf, B. R., et al., Ovarian-adnexal reporting lexicon for ultrasound: A white paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(10):1415–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basha, M. A. A., Metwally, M. I., Gamil, S. A., et al., Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(2):674–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreotti, R. F., Timmerman, D., Strachowski, L. M., et al., O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. Radiology. 2020;294(1):168–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, S. A., Abou-Taleb, H., Yehia, A., et al., The accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography and laparoscopy in the prediction of peritoneal carcinomatosis index score in primary ovarian cancer. Acad Radiol. 2019;26(12):1650–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrom, J., Widjaja, E., Redman, C. W., et al., Can pre-operative computed tomography predict resectability of ovarian carcinoma at primary laparotomy? BJOG. 2002;109(4):369–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Esquivel, J., Chua, T. C., Stojadinovic, A., et al., Accuracy and clinical relevance of computed tomography scan interpretation of peritoneal cancer index in colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: A multi-institutional study. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(6):565–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 477. The role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):742–6.Google Scholar
Chan, J. K., Kapp, D. S., Shin, J. Y., et al., Influence of the gynecologic oncologist on the survival of ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(6):1342–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earle, C. C., Schrag, D., Neville, B. A., et al., Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(3):172–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelen, M. J., Kos, H. E., Willemse, P. H., et al., Surgery by consultant gynecologic oncologists improves survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106(3):589–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giede, K. C., Kieser, K., Dodge, J., et al., Who should operate on patients with ovarian cancer? An evidence-based review. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99(2):447–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dioun, S., Huang, Y., Melamed, A., et al., Trends in the Use of Minimally Invasive Adnexal Surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138(5):738–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Hidlebaugh, D. A., Vulgaropulos, S., Orr, R. K., Treating adnexal masses. Operative laparoscopy vs. laparotomy. J Reprod Med. 1997;42(9):551–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Matsuo, K., Machida, H., Yamagami, W., et al., Intraoperative capsule rupture, postoperative chemotherapy, and survival of women with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(5):1017–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhode, J. M., Advincula, A. P., Reynolds, R. K., et al., A minimally invasive technique for management of the large adnexal mass. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(5):476–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunoo, C. S., Laparoscopic removal of a large adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5 Pt 2):1087–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berek, J. S., Renz, M., Kehoe, S., et al., Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;155(Suppl 1):6185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, J. A., Peres, L. C., Wang, C., et al., Challenges and opportunities in studying the epidemiology of ovarian cancer subtypes. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017;4(3):211–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaldawy, A., Segev, Y., Lavie, O., et al., Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: A review. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143(2):433–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goff, B. A., Sainz de la Cuesta, R., Muntz, H. G., et al., Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy in stage III disease. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;60(3):412–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, D. S., Kaye, S. Ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: A continuing enigma. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60(4):355–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoerl, H. D., Hart, W. R. Primary ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinomas: A clinicopathologic study of 49 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22(12):1449–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. O., Berwick, M., Verschraegen, C. F., et al., Incidence and survival rates for female malignant germ cell tumors. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):1075–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
La Vecchia, C., Morris, H. B., Draper, G. J. Malignant ovarian tumours in childhood in Britain, 1962–78. Br J Cancer. 1983;48(3):363–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, J. P., Kumar, S., Bryant, C. S., et al., A population-based analysis of 788 cases of yolk sac tumors: A comparison of males and females. Int J Cancer. 2008;123(11):2671–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, R. H., The yolk sac tumor: Reflections on a remarkable neoplasm and two of the many intrigued by it-Gunnar Teilum and Aleksander Talerman-and the bond it formed between them. Int J Surg Pathol. 2014;22(8):677–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, R. H., Sex cord-stromal tumors of the ovary and testis: Their similarities and differences with consideration of selected problems. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(Suppl 2):S8198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malmstrom, H., Högberg, T., Risberg, B., et al., Granulosa cell tumors of the ovary: prognostic factors and outcome. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;52(1):50–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litta, P., Saccardi, C., Conte, L., et al., Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors: Current status of surgical management: literature review and proposal of treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29(5):412–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fader, A. N., Rose, P. G. Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(20):2873–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bristow, R. E., Tomacruz, R. S., Armstrong, D. K., et al., Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5):1248–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, A. A., Bohlke, K., Armstrong, D. K., et al., Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143(1):315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kehoe, S., Hook, J., Nankivell, M., et al., Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):249–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergote, I., Tropé, C. G., Amant, F., et al., Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(10):943–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, J., Haldar, K., Kehoe, S. et al., Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(8):CD005343.Google ScholarPubMed
Tew, W. P., Lacchetti, C., Ellis, A., et al., PARP inhibitors in the management of ovarian cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(30):3468–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torre, L. A., Trabert, B., DeSantis, C. E., et al., Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):284–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, W. E., 3rd, Maxwell, G. L., Tian, C., et al., Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3621–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacoby, V. L., Grady, D., Wactawski-Wende, J., et al., Oophorectomy vs ovarian conservation with hysterectomy: Cardiovascular disease, hip fracture, and cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(8):760–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Network, N.C.C. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic. Version 3.2023. April 9, 2023.Google Scholar
Parker, W. H., Broder, M. S., Chang, E., et al., Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the nurses’ health study. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(5):1027–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocca, W. A., Grossardt, B. R., de Andrade, M., et al., Survival patterns after oophorectomy in premenopausal women: A population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(10):821–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinno, A. K., Pinkerton, J., Febbraro, T., et al., Hormone therapy (HT) in women with gynecologic cancer and in women at high risk for developing a gynecologic cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) clinical practice statement: This practice statement has been endorsed by The North American Menopause Society. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;157(2):303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, L., Iversen, O. E., Rudenstam, C. M., et al., Increased risk of recurrence after hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(7):475–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadowski, E. A., Thomassin-Naggara, I., Rockall, A., et al., O-RADS MRI risk stratification system: Guide for assessing adnexal lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee. Radiology. 2022;303(1):3547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amin, M. B. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Vol. 1024. Springer; 2017.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×