Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:06:51.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Surgical management of symptomatic carotid disease: carotid endarterectomy and extracranial-intracranial bypass

from Background

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Jonathan L. Brisman
Affiliation:
New Jersey Neuroscience Institute, Edison, NJ, USA
Marc R. Mayberg
Affiliation:
Seattle Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
Jonathan Gillard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Graves
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Thomas Hatsukami
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Chun Yuan
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Stroke is a major health care problem in the United States, representing the third leading cause of death and the primary cause of disability (Mayberg, 1996). It is estimated that 700 000 people suffer a stroke in the United States annually resulting in approximately 53.6 billion dollars in direct and indirect costs (Hanel et al., 2005). These numbers are expected to increase with an aging population.

Symptomatic carotid stenosis or occlusion is, by some estimates, responsible for 25% of all ischemic stroke (Hanel et al., 2005) with an estimated 6–7% estimated annual stroke rate for patients with both symptomatic carotid stenosis or completed occlusion (Mayberg, 1996; Grubb and Powers, 2001). Sufficient evidence is now available from several clinical trials (MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial, 1991; Mayberg et al., 1991; Barnett et al., 1998) showing that carotid endarterectomy can reduce the risk of stroke for symptomatic carotid stenosis. More recent evidence (Yadav et al., 2004) has shown that in certain subgroups of patients (high risk for carotid endarterectomy), carotid angioplasty and stenting may be an equally safe and effective treatment. This chapter will review the major clinical trials on carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty and stenting and summarize the technique used by the authors for carotid endarterectomy. A brief review of the role for carotid angioplasty and stenting will shed light on the future that carotid endarterectomy may play in a rapidly changing environment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Carotid Disease
The Role of Imaging in Diagnosis and Management
, pp. 72 - 85
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, M., McCann, R. and Smith, T. (1997). Schneider WALLSTENT EndoProsthesis Clinical Investigators: A randomized trial of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis – Study design. Journal of Neurovascular Disease, 2, 228–34.Google Scholar
Amin-Hanjani, S., Du, X., Zhao, M., et al. (2005). Use of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography to stratify stroke risk in symptomatic vertebrobasilar disease. Stroke, 36, 1140–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ausman, J. I. and Diaz, F. G. (1986). Critique of the extracranial-intracranial bypass study. Surgical Neurology, 26, 218–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awad, I. A. and Spetzler, R. F. (1986). Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery: a critical analysis in light of the International Cooperative Study. Neurosurgery, 19, 655–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, H. J., Taylor, D. W., Eliasziw, M., et al. (1998). Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1415–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, R., Armonda, R. and Noonan, P. (2002). Modern Imaging in the management of cervical carotid stenosis. In Fisher, W. III and Armonda, R. (eds.), Seminars in Neurosurgery - Carotid Artery Disease: Contemporary Treatment. New York: Thieme, pp. 217–28.Google Scholar
Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. (1991). North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 445–53.
Brisman, J. L. and Berenstein, A. (2003). Received wisdom vs evidence in stroke prevention: carotid stenting will soon replace endarterectomy for all patients requiring such revascularization. Medical Genetics and Medicine, 5, 17.Google ScholarPubMed
Butz, B., Dorenbeck, U., Borisch, I., et al. (2004). High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. Acta Radiology, 45, 164–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charbel, F. T., Meglio, G. and Amin-Hanjani, S. (2005). Superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery bypass. Neurosurgery, 56, 186–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Cumming, M. J. and Morrow, I. M. (1994). Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of Computerized tomography angiography and conventional angiography. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 163, 517–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, E. J., Bond, R., Mayberg, M. R., et al. (2004). Risk of persistent cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Neurosurgery, 101, 445–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, A. L., Rhoton, A. L. Jr. and Little, J. R. (1986) The extracranial-intracranial bypass study. Surgical Neurology, 26, 222–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demchuk, A. M., Christou, I., Wein, T. H., et al. (2000). Accuracy and criteria for localizing arterial occlusion with transcranial Doppler. Journal of Neuroimaging, 10, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derdeyn, C. P., Videen, T. O., Fritsch, S. M., et al. (1999). Compensatory mechanisms for chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in patients with carotid occlusion. Stroke, 30, 1019–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derdeyn, C. P., Videen, , , T. O., Yundt, , K. D., et al. (2002). Variability of cerebral blood volume and oxygen extraction: stages of cerebral haemodynamic impairment revisited. Brain, 125, 595–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donato, A. T. and Hill, S. L. (1992). Carotid arterial surgery using local anesthesia: a private practice retrospective study. American Surgery, 58, 446–50.Google ScholarPubMed
El Saden, S. M., Grant, E. G., Hathout, G. M., et al. (2001). Imaging of the internal carotid artery: the dilemma of total versus near total occlusion. Radiology, 221, 301–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. (1985). Results of an international randomized trial. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 1191–200.
Flanigan, D. P., Schuler, J. J., Vogel, M., et al. (1985) The role of carotid duplex scanning in surgical decision making. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldring, S., Zervas, N. and Langfitt, T. (1987) The Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Study. A report of the committee appointed by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons to examine the study. New England Journal of Medicine, 316, 817–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, W. A. (2004). A cardiologist in the carotids. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43, 1602–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, W. A. (2005). Cervical carotid revascularization: indications from an endovascular perspective. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 16, 259–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grubb, R. L. Jr., Derdeyn, C. P., Fritsch, S. M., et al. (1998). Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1055–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grubb, R. L. Jr. and Powers, W. J. (2001). Risks of stroke and current indications for cerebral revascularization in patients with carotid occlusion. Neurosurgical Clinics of North America, 12, 473–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Grubb, R. L. Jr., Powers, W. J., Derdeyn, C. P., et al. (2003) The carotid occlusion surgery study. Neurosurgery Focus, 14, e9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanel, R. A., Levy, E. I., Guterman, L. R., et al. (2005). Cervical carotid revascularization: the role of angioplasty with stenting. Neurosurgical Clinics of North America, 16, 263–78, viii.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobson, R. W. (2000). Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial): background, design, and current status. Seminars in Vascular Surgery, 13, 139–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Hobson, R. W. (2002). Update on the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial) protocol. Journal of American College of Surgery, 194, S9–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobson, R. W., Howard, V. J., Brott, T. G., et al. (2001). Organizing the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial): National Institutes of Health, Health Care Financing Administration, and industry funding. Current Control of Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2, 160–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, D. C. and Goldstein, L. B. (2001). Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology, 56, 1009–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, J., Quan, H., Ghali, W. A., et al. (2004). Importance of the imaging modality in decision making about carotid endarterectomy. Neurology, 62, 901–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klempen, N. L., Janardhan, V., Schwartz, R. B., et al. (2002). Shaking limb transient ischemic attacks: unusual presentation of carotid artery occlusive disease: report of two cases. Neurosurgery, 51, 483–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayberg, M. R. (1996). Extracranial occlusive disease of the carotid artery. In Youmans, J. R. (ed.), Neurological Surgery, 4th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, pp. 1159–80.Google Scholar
Mayberg, M. R. (2002). Carotid artery stenting: fact or fiction. Clinical Neurosurgery, 49, 247–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Mayberg, M. R., Wilson, S. E., Yatsu, F., et al. (1991). Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 3289–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendelowitsch, A., Taussky, P., Rem, J. A., et al. (2004). Clinical outcome of standard extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Acta Neurochirurgica, (Wien.), 146, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, W. S., Barnett, H. J., Beebe, H. G., et al. (1995). Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation, 91, 566–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medical research council European Carotid Surgery Trial. (1991). Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet, 337, 1235–43.CrossRef
Nederkoorn, P. J., Mali, W. P., Eikelboom, B. C., et al. (2002). Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing. Stroke, 33, 2003–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, D. W. (1995) Transcranial Doppler measurements. New Horizons, 3, 423–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Newell, D. W., Aaslid, R., Lam, A., et al. (1994). Comparison of flow and velocity during dynamic autoregulation testing in humans. Stroke, 25, 793–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, D. W. and Vilela, , , M. D. (2004). Superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass. Neurosurgery, 54, 1441–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, S. G., Collie, D. A., Wardlaw, J. M., et al. (2002). Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if Computerized tomography angiography, Magnetic resonance angiography, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 73, 21–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pessin, M. S., Duncan, G. W., Mohr, J. P., et al. (1977). Clinical and angiographic features of carotid transient ischemic attacks. New England Journal of Medicine, 296, 358–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothwell, P. M., Eliasziw, M., Gutnikov, , , S. A., et al. (2003). Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet, 361, 107–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spetzler, R. F., Martin, N., Hadley, M. N., et al. (1986). Microsurgical endarterectomy under barbiturate protection: a prospective study. Journal of Neurosurgery, 65, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stavenow, L., Bjerre, P. and Lindgarde, F. (1987). Experiences of duplex ultrasonography of carotid arteries performed by clinicians–correlation to angiography. Acta Medica Scandinavica, 222, 31–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundt, T. M. Jr. (1983). The ischemic tolerance of neural tissue and the need for monitoring and selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke, 14, 93–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundt, T. M. Jr. (1987). Was the international randomized trial of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass representative of the population at risk?New England Journal of Medicine, 316, 814–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wanebo, J. E., Zabramski, J. M. and Spetzler, R. F. (2004). Superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery bypass grafting for cerebral revascularization. Neurosurgery, 55, 395–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wutke, R., Lang, W., Fellner, C., et al. (2002). High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective X-ray angiography. Stroke, 33, 1522–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yadav, J. S., Wholey, M. H., Kuntz, R. E., et al. (2004). Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 1493–1501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×