Bibliography

doi:10.1017/9781108609654.017

Abbott, Edwin, Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions (London: Seeley and Co., 1884).Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges, “Le règlement des différends à l’OMC et le droit international général,” in Yerxa, Rufus and Wilson, Bruce (eds.), Questions Clès dans le Domaine du Règlement des Différends de l’OMC: Les Dix Premières Années (Geneva: Secrétariat de l’OMC, 2007), 7–11.Google Scholar

Acosta Arcarazo, Diego, National versus the Foreigner in South America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Acosta Arcarazo, Diego, “Turning the Immigration Policy Paradox Upside Down? Populist Liberalism and Discursive Gaps in South America,” (2015) 49 International Migration Review 659–696.Google Scholar

Acosta Arcarazo, Diego and Geddes, Andrew, “Transnational Diffusion or Different Models? Regional Approaches to Migration Governance in the European Union and MERCOSUR,” (2014) 16 European Journal of Migration and Law 19–44.Google Scholar

Adam, Stanislas and Van Elsuwege, Peter, “Citizenship Rights and the Federal Balance between the European Union and Its Member States,” (2012) 37 European Law Review 176–190.Google Scholar

Adepoju, Aderanti, “Fostering Free Movement of Persons in West Africa: Achievements, Constraints, and Prospects for Intraregional Migration,” (2002) 40 International Migration 3–28.Google Scholar

Adepoju, Aderanti, “Migration Management in West Africa within the Context of ECOWAS Protocol on Free Movement of Persons and the Common Approach on Migration,” in OECD (ed.), Regional Challenges of West African Migration (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2009), 17–47.Google Scholar

Adinolfi, Giovanna, “Il diritto non scritto nel sistema OMC,” in Palchetti, Paolo (ed.), L’Incidenza del Diritto non Scritto sul Diritto Internazionale ed Europeo (Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2016), 75–113.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Akehurst, Michael, “Jurisdiction in International Law,” (1972–1973) 46 British Yearbook of International Law 145–257.Google Scholar

Alston, Philip, “Does the Past Matter? On the Origins of Human Rights,” (2013) 126 Harvard Law Review 2043–2081.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context,” (2008) 14 European Journal of International Relations 33–63.Google Scholar

Alvarez, José, “Beware: Boundary Crossings,” in Kahana, Tsvi and Scolnicov, Anat (eds.), Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights: Human Rights, Private Actors, and Positive Obligations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 43–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alvarez, José, “The Return of the State,” (2011) 20 Minnesota Journal of International Law 223–264.Google Scholar

Amaya, Amalia, “Exemplarism and Judicial Virtue,” (2013) 25 Law and Literature 428–445.Google Scholar

Amaya, Amalia, “Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence,” (2011) 24 Ratio Juris 304–329.Google Scholar

Amaya, Amalia, The Tapestry of Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Coherence and Its Role in Legal Argument (Oxford: Hart, 2015).Google Scholar

Amstutz, Marc, “In-Between Worlds: Marleasing and the Emergence of Interlegality in Legal Reasoning” (2005) 11 European Law Journal 766–784.Google Scholar

Amstutz, Marc and Karavas, Vagios, “Weltrecht: Ein Derridasches Monster,” in Calliess, Graf-Peter, Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, Wielsch, Dan, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009), 645–672.Google Scholar

Andreas, Peter, “Illicit Globalisation Myths and Misconceptions,” in Mitsilegas, Valsamis, Alldridge, Peter, and Cheliotis, Leonidis (eds.), Globalisation, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Hart, 2015), 45–64.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, Laurens J. and Geursen, Wessel W., “Ruiz Zambrano: De Interne Situatie Voorbij,” (2011) 4 Asiel & Migrantenrecht 156–164.Google Scholar

Applbaum, Arthur Isak, Ethics for Adversaries: The Morality of Roles in Public and Professional Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Appleton, Arthur E., “PIL and IEL: Will Seal Deaths Resurrect the Dream of International Legal Coherence?” (2014) 9 Questions of International Law 5–18.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas, Quaestiones, available at www.corpusthomisticum.org/sth2090.html Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas, Treatise on the Virtues (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984, Oesterle trans.).Google Scholar

Arangio Ruiz, Gaetano, “International Law and Interindividual Law,” in Nijman, Janne and Nollkaemper, André (eds.), New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 15–51.Google Scholar

Arato, Julian, “Subsequent Practice in the Whaling Case and What the ICJ Implies about Treaty Interpretation in International Organizations,” EJILTalk!, 31 March 2014.Google Scholar

Arcari, M. and Ninatti, S., Exploring Counter-Constitutionalism: The Backlash Effect of Constitutional Vocabulary of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, Workshop Draft Paper, July 2017.CrossRef Google Scholar

Archibugi, Daniele and Held, David, Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Arcuri, Allessandra and Poli, Sara, What Price for the Community Enforcement of WTO Law? EUI Working Papers, Law, 2010/2011.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Penguin, 2006 [1962]).Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution (London: Penguin, 1963).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , The Nicomachean Ethics (Penguin: New York, 1976, Thomson, trans.).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Politics, translated by Benjamin Jowett, available at classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.3.three.html Google Scholar

Aristotle, , The Politics (London: Penguin, 1962, Sinclair, trans.).Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, “Res Interpretata, Erga Omnes Effect and the Role of the Margin of Appreciation in Giving Domestic Effect to the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights,” (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 819–843.Google Scholar

Arraiza, José-Maria, “Good Neighbourliness as a Limit to Extraterritorial Citizenship: The Case of Hungary and Slovakia,” in Kochenov, Dimitry and Basheska, Elena (eds.), Good Neighbourliness in the European Legal Context (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2015), 114–135.Google Scholar

Austin, John L., How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995 [1832]).Google Scholar

Azoulai, Loic, “Transfiguring European Citizenship: From Member State Territory to Union Territory,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 178–203.Google Scholar

Baars, Grietje et al., “The Role of Law in Global Value Chains: A Research Manifesto,” (2016) 4 London Review of International Law 57–79.Google Scholar

Babar, Zahra, “Free Mobility within the Gulf Cooperation Council,” (2011) Center for International and Regional Studies Occasional Paper 8.Google Scholar

Backer, Larry Catá, “Are Supply Chains Transnational Legal Orders? What We Can Learn from the Rana Plaza Factory Building Collapse,” (2016) 1 UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational and Comparative Law 11–66.Google Scholar

Backer, Larry Catá, “Economic Globalization and the Rise of Efficient Systems of Global Private Lawmaking: Wal-Mart as Global Legislator,” (2007) 39 University of Connecticut Law Review 1739–1784.Google Scholar

Backer, Larry Catá, “Theorizing Regulatory Governance within its Ecology: The Structure of Management in an Age of Globalization,” (2018) 24 Contemporary Politics 607–630.Google Scholar

Baird, Rachel, “The Antarctic Treaty System and Japan’s Scientific Whaling in the Southern Ocean – Is There an Obligation to Protect the Antarctic Marine Ecosystem?” (2008) 11 Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law 193–206.Google Scholar

Balkin, J. M., “Agreements with Hell and Other Objects of Our Faith,” (1997) 65 Fordham Law Review 1703–1738.Google Scholar

Balkin, J. M., “The Proliferation of Legal Truth,” (2003) 26 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 5–16.Google Scholar

Barral, Virginie and Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, “Sustainable Development through Integration,” in Vinuales, Jorge (ed.), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 157–180.Google Scholar

Barroche, Julien, Etat, Libéralisme et Christianisme – Critique de la Subsidiarité Européenne (Paris: Dalloz, 2012).Google Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, “Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings,” (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade 499.Google Scholar

Basch, Fernando et al., “La Efectividad del Sistema Interamericano de Protección de Derechos Humanos: Un Enfoque Cuantitativo sobre su Funcionamiento y sobre el Cumplimento de sus Decisiones,” (2010) 7 Sur: Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos 9–36.Google Scholar

Battini, Stefano, Amministrazioni senza Stato. Profili di Diritto Amministrativo Internazionale (Milan: Giuffrè, 2003).Google Scholar

Baude, William and Doerfler, Ryan D., “Arguing with Friends,” available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2985032 Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard, Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren, Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, The Law of Global Governance (The Hague: Hague Academy of International Law, 2014).Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, “Global Legal Pluralism,” (2007) 80 Southern California Law Review 1155–1237.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, “The Globalization of Jurisdiction,” (2002) 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 311–545.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bernstein, Steven and Cashore, Benjamin, “Can Non-State Global Governance be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework,” (2007) 1 Regulation & Governance 347–371.Google Scholar

Bernstorff, Jochen von, Der Glaube an das universal Recht: zur Völkerrechtstheorie Hans Kelsens und seiner Schüler (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001).Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “The Authority of International Law: Lifting the State Veil,” (2009) 31 Sydney Law Review 343–380.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Community Interests in International Law: Whose Interests are They and How does One Identify Them?” in Benvenisti, E. and Nolte, G. (eds.), Community Obligations in Contemporary International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 36–49.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Community Interests in the Identification of International Law: With a Special Emphasis on Treaty Interpretation and Customary Law Identification,” in Benvenisti, Eyal and Nolte, Georg (eds.), Community Obligations in Contemporary International Law (Oxford University Press, 2018), 50–69.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Deliberative Demoi-cracy in the European Union. Towards the Deterritorialization of Democracy,” in Besson, Samantha and Luis Marti, José (eds.), Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), 181–214.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “European Legal Pluralism after Kadi,” (2009) 5 European Constitutional Law Review 237–264.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “The Extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights. Why Human Rights Depend on Jurisdiction and What Jurisdiction Amounts To,” (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 857–884.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Fédéralisme et droits de l’homme: une introduction thématique,” in Besson, Samantha and Belser, Eva Maria (eds.), La Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme et les Cantons (Zurich: Schulthess, 2014), 7–39.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Human Rights and Democracy in a Global Context – Decoupling and Recoupling,” (2011) 4 Ethics and Global Politics 19–50.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Human Rights as Transnational Constitutional Law,” in Lang, Anthony and Wiener, Antje (eds.), Handbook on Global Constitutionalism (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017), 234–247.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Individual and State Liability for an International Organization’s Responsibility – The Challenge of Fairness Unveiled,” (2017) 6 Italian Journal of Legal Philosophy 51–78.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “International Law’s Relative Authority, Review of Nicole Roughan’s Authorities. Conflicts, Cooperation and Transnational Legal Theory,” (2015) 6 Jurisprudence 169–176.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “L’extra-territorialité des droits de l’homme internationaux: juridictions concurrentes, obligations conjointes et responsabilités partagées,” in d’Argent, Pierre (ed.), Droit des Frontières Internationales (Paris: Pedone, 2016).Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Law Beyond the State: A Reply to Liam Murphy,” (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law, 233–240.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Shared Responsibilities under the ECHR: Concurrent Jurisdictions, Duties and Responsibilities,” in Motoc, J. et al. (eds.), The ECHR and General International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Sovereignty,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 9 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) 366–391.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “State Consent and Disagreement in International Law-Making: Dissolving the Paradox,” (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 289–316.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Subsidiarity in International Human Rights Law – What is Subsidiary about Human Rights?” (2016) 61 American Journal of Jurisprudence 69–107.CrossRef Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “The Truth about Legal Pluralism, Review of Nico Krisch’s Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law,” (2012) European Constitutional Law Review 354–361.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Theorizing the Sources of International Law,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 164–185.Google Scholar

Bethlehem, Daniel, “The End of Geography: The Changing Nature of the International System and the Challenge to International Law,” (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 9–24.Google Scholar

Bettelheim, Bruno, A Good Enough Parent (New York: Vintage, 1988).Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, “Reply to Professor Maier,” in Matthias Meessen, Karl (ed.), Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Theory and Practice (The Hague: Kluwer, 1996), 74–102.Google Scholar

Blake, Judith and Davis, Kingsley, “Norms, Values, and Sanctions,” in Faris, Robert E. L. (ed.), Handbook of Modern Sociology (Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1964), 456–484.Google Scholar

Bleckmann, Albert, “The Personal Jurisdiction of the European Community,” (1980) 17 Common Market Law Review 467–486.Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, “Plurality in the Fabric of International Courts and Tribunals: The Threads of a Managerial Approach,” (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 13–72.Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence and Sands, Philippe (eds.), International Law, The International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Bos, Maarten, “Preliminary Report on the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of States,” (1993) 65 Yearbook of the International Law Institute 14.Google Scholar

Bosniak, Linda, “Citizenship Denationalized,” (2000) 7 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 447–510.Google Scholar

Bosniak, Linda, “Persons and Citizens in Constitutional Thought,” (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 9–29.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field,” (1987) 38 Hastings Law Journal 805–853.Google Scholar

Boxer, Karin E., Rethinking Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Bredbenner, Candice L., A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Brölmann, Catherine, “Deterritorializing International Law: Moving Away from the Divide between National and International Law,” in Nijman, Janna and Nollkaemper, André (eds.), New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 84–109.Google Scholar

Bronckers, Marco, “From ‘Direct Effect’ to ‘Muted Dialogue’: Recent Developments in the European Courts’ Case Law on the WTO and Beyond,” (2008) 11 Journal of International Economic Law 885.Google Scholar

Brown, Chester, A Common Law of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke, Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke, “Dialectical Snares: Human Rights and Democracy in the World Society,” (2009) 2 Ethics and Global Politics 219–239.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Buck-Morss, Susan, Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Buhmann, Karin, “Business and Human Rights: Understanding the UN Guiding Principles from the Perspective of Transnational Business Governance Interactions,” (2015) 6 Transnational Legal Theory 399–434.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1977).Google Scholar

Burton, Stephen, Judging in Good Faith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Buxbaum, Hannah, “Territory, Territoriality and the Resolution of Jurisdictional Conflict,” (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 631–675.Google Scholar

Caddell, Richard, “‘Only Connect’? Regime Interaction and Global Biodiversity Conservation,” in Bowman, Michael, Davies, Peter, and Goodwin, Edward (eds.), Research Handbook on Biodiversity and Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 443–446.Google Scholar

Calliess, Gralf-Peter and Zumbansen, Peer, Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, Enzo, “Margin of Appreciation and Reasonableness in the ICJ’s Decision in the Whaling Case,” in d’Argent, Pierre, Bonafé, Beatrice, and Combacau, Jean, (eds.), Les Limites du Droit International. Essais en l’Honneur de Joe Verhoeven (Brussels: Bruylant, 2014), 449–455.Google Scholar

Cardesa-Salzmann, Antonio, “Constitutionalizing Secondary Rules in Global Environmental Regimes: Non-Compliance Procedures and the Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements,” (2012) 24 Journal of Environmental Law 103–132.Google Scholar

Cardozo, Benjamin N., The Nature of the Judicial Process (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991 [1921]).Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph, “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders,” (1987) 49 Review of Politics 251–273.Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph, The Ethics of Immigration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Carrara, Francesco, “Delitti commessi all’estero,” in Opuscoli di Diritto Criminale, 2nd edn. (Lucca: Tipografia Giusti, 1870).Google Scholar

Carta, Andrea and Ankersmit, Laurens, “AG Wathelet in C-284/16 Achmea: Saving ISDS?” available at https://europeanlawblog.eu/tag/ag-wathelet-in-c-28416-achmea.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, and Zappalà, Salvatore (eds.), The Human Dimension of International Law: Selected Papers of Antonio Cassese (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Cassese, Sabino, “Administrative Law without the State – The Challenge of Global Regulation,” (2005) 37 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 663–694Google Scholar

Cassese, Sabino, The Global Polity. Global Dimensions of Democracy and the Rule of Law (Sevilla: Global Law Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Cassese, Sabino, I Tribunali di Babele (Roma: Donzelli, 2009)Google Scholar

Cassese, Sabino, Il Diritto Globale. Giustizia e Democrazia Oltre lo Stato (Torino: Einaudi, 2009).Google Scholar

Cassese, Sabino, “Lo spazio giuridico globale,” (2002) 52 Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico 323–339.Google Scholar

Cassese, Sabino, “Nel labirinto delle globalizzazioni,” (2007) 4 Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico 921–930Google Scholar

Cassese, Sabino, “Shrimps, Turtles and Procedures: Global Standards for National Administrative Procedure,” (2005) 68 Law & Contemporary Problems 109–126.Google Scholar

Castrucci, Emanuele, On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Chamberlain, Lesley, The Philosophy Steamer: Lenin and the Exile of the Intelligentsia (London: Atlantic Books, 2006).Google Scholar

Chan, Johannes M. M., “The right to a Nationality As a Human Right. The Current Trend towards Recognition,” (1991) 12 Human Rights Law Journal 1–14.Google Scholar

Chanock, Martin, Law, Custom, and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antionia Handler, The New Sovereignty: Compliance and International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Chehtman, Alejandro, Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Chimni, B.S., International Law and World Order: A Critique of Contemporary Approaches, 2nd edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Chiti, Edoardo, “Decentralized Implementation: European Agencies,” in Schütze, Robert and Tridimas, Takis (eds.), Oxford Principles of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 748–776.Google Scholar

Chiti, Edoardo, L’Amministrazione Militare (Milan: Giuffrè, 2007).Google Scholar

Chiti, Edoardo, “The European Security and Defense Administration within the Context of the Global Legal Space,” (2007) NYC School of Law Jean Monnet Working Paper 7.Google Scholar

Chiti, Edoardo and Wessel, Ramses A., “The Emergence of International Agencies in the Global Administrative Space,” in Collins, Richard and White, Nigel D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy (London: Routledge, 2011), 142–159.Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas, “A Democratic Theory of Territory and Some Puzzles about Global Democracy,” (2006) 37 Journal of Social Philosophy 81–107.Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas, “Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 119–137.Google Scholar

Claes, Monica and de Visser, Maartje, “Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks,” (2012) 8 Utrecht Law Review 100–114.Google Scholar

Clausen, Jens, Keil, Michael, and Jungwirth, Martin, “The State of EMAS in the EU. Eco-Management as a Tool for Sustainable Development,” (2002) Literature Study (for EMAS II Conference, 26–27 June 2002, Brussels, Belgium).Google Scholar

Cohen, Gerald, “Beliefs and Rôles,” (1966–67) 67 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 17–34.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean, Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy and Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Cohen, Michael, March, James, and Olsen, Johan, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” (1972) 17 Administrative Science Quarterly 1–25.Google Scholar

Cohen, Stanley, “Crime and Politics: Spot the Difference,” (1996) 47 British Journal of Sociology 1–21.Google Scholar

Colangelo, Anthony, “Spatial Legality,” (2012) 107 Northwestern University Law Review 69–126.Google Scholar

Confucius, , The Analects (London: Penguin, 1979, Lau, trans.).Google Scholar

Cortese, Ennio, La Norma Giuridica. Spunti Teorici nel Diritto Comune Classico (Milan: Giuffrè, 1962).Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, “The Concept of Crime and Transnational Networks of Community,” in Mitsilegas, Valsamis, Alldridge, Peter, and Cheliotis, Leonidis (eds.), Globalisation, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Hart, 2015), 7–24.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, “Comparative Law and Legal Culture,” in Zimmermann, Reinhard and Reimann, Mathias (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 709–738.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, “Does Global Legal Pluralism Need a Concept of Law?” in Baxi, Upendra, McCrudden, Christopher, and Paliwala, Abdul (eds.), Law’s Ethical, Global and Theoretical Contexts. Essays in Honour of William Twining (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 303–319.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, Living Law: Studies in Legal and Social Theory (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, “International Trade Law: The Impact of Justiciability and Separation of Powers in EC Law,” (2009) 5 European Constitutional Law Review 307.Google Scholar

Cover, Robert, “The Supreme Court 1982 Term. Foreword: Nomos and Narrative,” (1983) 97 Harvard Law Review 4–68.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul, “Global Networks and Shared Administration,” in Cassese, Sabino (ed.), Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 153–173.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul, “The Nature of the Community: Integration, Democracy, and Legitimacy,” in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 3.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of International Law, 8th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise, “Member States as Trustees of the Union Interest: Participating in International Agreements on Behalf of the European Union,” in Arnull, Anthony, Barnard, Catherine, Dougan, Michael, and Spaventa, Eleanor (eds.), A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in Honour of Alan Dashwood (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 435–457.Google Scholar

Culver, Keith and Giudice, Michael, Legality’s Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre, “Civil Society and the European Union: Opening Spaces for Deliberative democracy,” (1999) Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law 185.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A., “Federalism and the Democratic Process,” in Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W. (eds.), Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy (New York: New York University Press, 1983), 95–108.Google Scholar

Dang, Tum Lam, “Relation associative: les États Fédérés de Micronésie: les spécificités de l’association,” in Faberon, Jean-Yves et al. (eds.), Destins des Collectivités Politiques d’Océanie, Vol. 1, (Marseille: Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 2011), 373–376.Google Scholar

Davies, Gareth T., “The Humiliation of the State as a Constitutional Tactic,” in Amtenbrink, Fabian and van den Berg, Peter (eds.), The Constitutional Integrity of the European Union (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2010), 147–174.Google Scholar

Davies, Gareth T., “‘Any Place I Hang My Hat?’” (2005) 11 European Law Journal 43–56.Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne, “The ECJ and the International Legal Order: A Re-Evaluation,” in de Búrca, Gráinne and Weiler, Joseph H. H. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 105–149.Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne, “The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi,” (2010) 51 Harvard International Law Journal 1.Google Scholar

de Groot, Gerard-René, “Overwegingen over de Janko Rottman – Beslissing van het Europese Hof van Justitie,” (2010) 5–6 Asiel & Migrantenrecht 293–300.Google Scholar

de Groot, Gerard-René, “Towards a European Nationality Law,” (2004) 8 Electronic Journal of Comparative Law.Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, “Beyond Neoliberal Governance: The World Social Forum as Subaltern Cosmopolitan Politics and Legality,” in de Sousa Santos, Boaventura and Rodríguez-Garavito, César A. (eds.), Law and Globalization from Below (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 29–63.Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, “Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law,” (1987) 14 Journal of Law and Society 279–302.Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, Toward a New Legal Common Sense, 2nd edn. (London: Butterworths, 2002).Google Scholar

de Wet, Erika, “Judicial Challenges to the Security Council’s Use of Sanctions,” in Farrall, Jeremy and Charlesworth, Hillary (eds.), Strengthening the Rule of Law through the UN Security Council (London: Routledge, 2016), 193–206.Google Scholar

del Mar, Maksymilian, “System Values and Understanding Legal Language,” (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 29–61.Google Scholar

del Ponte, Carla and Sudetic, Chuck, Mevrouw de Aanklager (Amsterdam: Bezige Bij, 2008, Van der Waa, trans.).Google Scholar

del Vecchio, Giorgio, “On the Statuality of Law,” (1937) 19 Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 1–20.Google Scholar

Delwaide, Jacobus, “The Return of the State?” (2011) 19 European Review 69–91.Google Scholar

Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Dewey, John, “The Quest for Certainty,” reproduced as John Dewey, The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 4 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988, Boydston ed.).Google Scholar

Dickson, Julie, “Towards a Theory of European Union Legal Systems,” in Dickson, Julie and Eleftheriadis, Pavlos (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 25–53.Google Scholar

Dimitrov, Ivaylo, “Digesting the AG Wathelet Opinion in Case C-284/16 Slowakische Republik v Achmea BV. Is It a Trap?” available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/10/07/digesting-ag-wathelet-opinion-case-c-28416-slowakische-republik-v-achmea-bv-trap.Google Scholar

Dimopoulos, Angelos, EU Foreign Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, “How International Courts Enhance Their Legitimacy,” (2013) 14 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 455–478.Google Scholar

Downie, R. S., Roles and Values: An Introduction to Social Ethics (London: Methuen and Co., 1971).Google Scholar

Driessen, Bart, “Interinstitutional Conventions and Institutional Balance,” (2008) 33 European Law Review 550.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John and Niemeyer, Simon, “Discursive Representation,” (2008) 102 American Political Science Review 481–493.Google Scholar

Dugard, John, “South Africa’s Independent Homelands: An Exercise in Denationalization,” (1980) 10 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 11–36.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis, Homo Aequalis I. Genèse et Épanouissement de l’Idéologie Économique, 2nd edn. (Paris: Gallimard, 1985).Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., “A New Approach to Regime Interaction,” in Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 136–174.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Duve, Thomas, “Was ist ‘Multinormativität’? – Einführende Bemerkungen,” (2017) 25 Rechtsgeschichte – Legal History 88–101.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, “A New Philosophy for International Law,” (2013) 41 Philosophy and Public Affairs 2–30.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (London: Fontana, 1986).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Dyer, L., “Anglo-Saxon Citizenship: A Proposition by Professor Dicey Looking to This End,” (1897) 3 The Barrister 107–110.Google Scholar

Eckert, Julia, “What is the Context of ‘Law in Context’?” in Patrick Dolan, Sean and Heckendorn Urscheler, Lukas (eds.), Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2014), 225–236.Google Scholar

Eckes, Christina, EU Counter-Terrorist Policies and Fundamental Rights: The Case of Individual Sanctions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Edward, David, “National Courts: The Powerhouse of Community Law,” (2002–2003) 5 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 1–13.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Eugen, Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts, 4. Aufl. (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, (1989 [1913]).Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Eugen, “Montesquieu and Sociological Jurisprudence,” (1916) 26 Harvard Law Review 582–600.Google Scholar

Ekins, Richard, “Judicial Supremacy and the Rule of Law,” (2003) 119 Law Quarterly Review 127–152.Google Scholar

Elholm, Thomas and Colson, Renaud, “The Symbolic Purpose of EU Criminal Law,” in Colson, Renaud and Field, Stewart (eds.), EU Criminal Justice and the Challenges of Diversity. Legal Cultures in the Area of Freedom, Security and justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 48–64.Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert, Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation, Band 2 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1976 [1938]).Google Scholar

Eller, Klaas H., “Private Governance of Global Value Chains from Within: Lessons from and for Transnational Law,” (2017) 8 Transnational Legal Theory 296–329.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C., Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Endicott, Timothy, “The Logic of Freedom and Power,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 245–260.Google Scholar

Engle-Merry, Sally, “From Law and Colonialism to Law and Globalization,” (2003) 28 Law and Social Inquiry 569–590.Google Scholar

Engle-Merry, Sally, “Legal Pluralism,” (1988) 22 Law and Society Review 869–896.Google Scholar

Eser, Albin, “Book Review: Comparative Concepts of Criminal Law,” (2016) 23 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 375–382.Google Scholar

Eser, Albin, “Grundlagen und Grenzen “stellvertretender Strafrechtspflege,” (§ 7 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 StGB) – Zur Problematik der “identischer Tatnorm” bei Auslandstaten, insbesondere bei Amnestierungen am Tatort,” (1993) Juristenzeitung 875.Google Scholar

Eser, Albin and Heilmann, Brigitte (eds.), Comparative Criminal Law: Development, Aims, Methods (Munich and Oxford: Beck-Hart-Nomos, 2017).Google Scholar

Eser, Albin, Lagodny, Otto, Blakesley, Christopher L. (eds.), The Individual as Subject of International Cooperation in Criminal Matters (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002).Google Scholar

Esty, Daniel C., “The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis,” (2002) 1 World Trade Review 7.Google Scholar

Evans, Andrew, “Nationality Law and European Integration,” (1991) 16 European Law Review 190–215.Google Scholar

Everling, Ulrich, “The European Union as a Federal Association of States and Citizens,” in von Bogdandy, Armin and Bast, Jürgen (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Oxford: Hart, 2006).Google Scholar

Fabbrini, Federico, “The Political Side of EU Citizenship in the Context of EU Federalism,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 271–293.Google Scholar

Fahrmeir, Andreas F., “Nineteenth-Century German Citizenships: A Reconsideration,” (1997) 40 The Historical Journal 721–752.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp, 2006).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, “Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law,” (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 999–1046.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew, Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500–2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Dai, Tamada (eds.), Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2014).Google Scholar

Fletcher, George, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustin J., The Constitution’s Gift: A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2011).Google Scholar

Francq, Stephanie, “The Scope of Secondary Community Law in the Light of the Methods of Private International Law – Or the Other Way Around?” (2006) 8 Yearbook of Private International Law 333–374.Google Scholar

Frankfurter, Felix, The Case of Sacco and Vanzetti: A Critical Analysis for Lawyers and Laymen (New York: Little, Brown & Co., 1961 [1927]).Google Scholar

Freestone, David, “Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area,” (2011) 105 American Journal of International Law 755–760.Google Scholar

French, Duncan, “From the Depths: Rich Pickings of Principles of Sustainable Development and General International Law on the Ocean Floor – The Seabed Disputes Chamber’s 2011 Advisory Opinion,” (2011) 26 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 525–568.Google Scholar

Friedman, Thomas L., The World Is Flat: The Globalized World in the Twenty-First Century (New York: Penguin, 2006).Google Scholar

Frison-Roche, Marie-Anne, “Penser le monde à partir de la notion de ‘donnée’,” in Frison-Roche, Marie Anne (ed.), Internet, Espace d’Interrégulation (Paris: Dalloz, 2016), 7–16.Google Scholar

Frydman, Benoit, “Comment penser le droit global?” in Chérot, Jean-Yves and Frydman, Benoit (eds.), La Science du Droit dans la Globalisation (Brussels: Bruylant, 2012), 17–48.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., Anatomy of the Law (New York: Praeger, 1968).Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law, 2nd edn. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., “On Legal Education,” reproduced in Winston, Kenneth I. (ed.), The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller (Oxford: Hart, 2001), 293–303.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart,” (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 630–672.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method, 2nd edn. (New York: Continuum, 1988).Google Scholar

Gaius, , Institutiones (London: John W. Parker & Son, 1859, Collett Sanders trans.).Google Scholar

Gallant, Kenneth, The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Gambaro, Antonio, “Western Legal Tradition,” in Newman, Peter (ed.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics and the Law (New York: Groves Dictionaries Inc., 1998), 687.Google Scholar

Gattinara, G., “Consistnt Interpretations of WTO Rulings in the EU Legal Order,” in Cannizzaro, Enzo, Palchetti, Paolo, and Wessel, Ramses (eds.), International Law As Law of the European Union (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff), 2012), 269.Google Scholar

Gautier, Philippe, “Le vertus pratiques des obligations générales relatives à l’environnement dans la Convention des Nations Unies sur le droit de la mer,” in Boschiero, Nerina, Pitea, Cesare, Ragni, Chiara, and Scovazzi, Tullio (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), 365–382.Google Scholar

George, Robert P., Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Gibney, Matthew, “The Rights of Non-Citizens in Political Thought,” in Sawyer, Caroline and Blitz, Brad K. (eds.), Statelessness in the European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 41–68.Google Scholar

Gogarty, Brendan, “Conceptions and (Mis)Conceptions of Science in International Treaties: The ICJ Whaling Case in Context,” (2015) 62 Yearbook of Polar Law 607–622.Google Scholar

Gogarty, Lawrence, “The ICJ Whaling Case: Missed Opportunity to Advance the Rule of Law in Resolving Science-related Disputes in Global Commons?” (2017) 77 Zeitschrift für auslandisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 161–197.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack and Wu, Tim, Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Gongora-Mera, Manuel, Inter-American Judicial Constitutionalism: On the Constitutional Rank of Human Rights Treaties in Latin America through National and Inter-American Adjudication (San José: Inter-American Institute of Human Rights, 2011).Google Scholar

Gordley, James, “Is Comparative Law a Distinct Discipline?” (1998) 46 American Journal of Comparative Law 607–615.Google Scholar

Grandmaison, Olivier, “The Exception and the Rule: On French Colonial Law,” (2006) 53 Diogenes 34–53.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John, “Legal Pluralism,” in Wright, James David (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 13, 2nd edn. (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015), 757–761.Google Scholar

Grimm, Dieter, Constitutionalism: Past, Present, and Future (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Grossi, Paolo, L’Ordine Giuridico Medievale (Bari: Laterza, 2000).Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, The Law of War and Peace (Oxford: Clarendon, 1925 [1625] Kelsey trans.).Google Scholar

Guerrero-Peniche, Juan, “La opinión consultiva del Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar: Aspectos relativos a la determinación del vínculo efectivo entre los Estados y las personas jurídicas a las que patrocinan para llevar a cabo actividades en la Zona,” (2012) 5 Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional 153–218.Google Scholar

Guèvremont, Véronique, “Traités multilatèraux: nouvelles perspectives relatives à l’articulation,” in Tomkiewicz, Vincent (ed.), Les Sources et les Normes dans le Droit de l’OMC (Paris: Pedone, 2012), 27.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for World Society,” (2008) 15 Constellations 444–455.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, Rehg trans.).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, A Theory of Communicative Action (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1987, McCarthy trans.).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2005).Google Scholar

Hafner, Gerhard, “Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law,” (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 849–864.Google Scholar

Hafner, Gerhard, “Risks Ensuing from the Fragmentation of International Law,” in Official Records of the General Assembly, 566 session, Supplement no. 10, 321 (UN Doc A/55/10).Google Scholar

Hage, Jaap, “Law and Coherence,” (2004) 17 Ratio Juris 87–105.Google Scholar

Hale, Brenda, “What’s the Point of Human Rights?” Warwick Law Lecture 2013, 28 November 2013.Google Scholar

Hallevy, Gabriel, A Modern Treatise on the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law, (Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2010).Google Scholar

Handl, Gunther, “Extra-Territoriality and Transnational Legal Authority,” in Handl, Gunther, Zekoll, Joachim, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 3–12.Google Scholar

Handl, Gunther, “Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area: The International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea’s Recent Contribution to International Environmental Law,” (2011) 20 Review of European, Comparative and International Environment Law 208–2013.Google Scholar

Harpaz, Yossi, “Compensatory Citizenship: Dual Nationality as a Strategy of Global Upward Mobility,” (2018) 36 Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1–20.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1994).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 593–629.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford: Clarendon, 1968).Google Scholar

Held, David, Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities (Cambridge: Polity, 2010).Google Scholar

Heller, Kevin Jon and Dubber, Marcus (eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Henckels, C., “GMOs in the WTO: A Critique of the Panel’s Reasoning in EC–Biotech,” (2006) 12 Melbourne Journal of International Law 278.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave (New York: Praeger, 1968).Google Scholar

Hernandez, Angel, “El principio de integración de los aspectos económicos, sociales y medioambientales del desarrollo sostenibile,” (2012) 64 Revista Española de Derecho Internacional 133–161.Google Scholar

Hernandez, Gleider I., “A Reluctant Guardian: The International Court of Justice and the Concept of International Community,” (2013) 83 British Yearbook of International Law 13–60.Google Scholar

Hinarejos, Alicia, “Extending Citizenship and the Scope of EU Law,” (2011) 70 Cambridge Law Journal 309–312.Google Scholar

Hindelang, Steffen, “The Autonomy of the European Legal Order: EU Constitutional Limits to Investor–State Arbitration on the Basis of Future EU Investment-related Agreements,” (2013) 4 European Yearbook of International Economic Law 187–198.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, The Elements of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, “Of the Laws of Nature,” in De Cive (1642), available at unilibrary.com.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (London: Penguin, 1981, MacPherson, ed.).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, 3 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 2012, Malcolm, ed.).Google Scholar

Hoekema, André, “European Legal Encounters between Minority and Majority Culture: Cases of Interlegality,” (2005) 51 Journal of Legal Pluralism & Unofficial Law 1–55.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Leonard H., “Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture,” 19 March 2009, available at www.brandeis.edu/ethics/pdfs/internationaljustice/biij/BIIJ2013/hoffmann.pdf Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig, “Human Rights and History,” (2016) 232 Past and Present 279–310.Google Scholar

Hogg, Peter W. and Bushell, Allison A., “The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing After All),” (1997) 35 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 75–124.Google Scholar

Honohan, Iseult, Civic Republicanism (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Hovell, Devika, The Power of Process: The Value of Due process in Security Council Sanctions Decision-Making (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, “Democracy, Science and Free Trade: Risk Regulation on Trial at the World Trade Organization,” (2000) 98 Michigan Law Review 2329.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, “Human Rights, International Economic Law and ‘Constitutional Justice’: A Reply by Robert Howse to Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann’s Article,” EJILTalk!, 9 December 2008.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, “Montesquieu on Commerce, Conquest, War, and Peace,” (2006) 31 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 693–708.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, “The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary,” (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 9–77.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert and Teitel, Ruti, “Cross-Judging: Tribunalization in a Fragmented but Interconnected Global Order,” (2009) 41 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 959–990.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, Langille, Joanna, and Sykes, Katie, “Pluralism in Practice: Moral Legislation and the Law of the WTO after Seal Products,” (2015) 48 George Washington International Law Review 81.Google Scholar

Hume, David, “On the Standards of Taste,” in Miller, Eugene F. (ed.), Hume: Essays Moral, Political and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985), 11–37.Google Scholar

Hunt, Lynn, Inventing Human Rights: A History (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2007).Google Scholar

Hunter-Henin, Myriam, “Living Together in an Age of Religious Diversity: Lessons from Baby Loup and SAS,” (2015) 4 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 94–118.Google Scholar

Huntington, S., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Husak, Douglas, “The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Extending the Debates,” (2013) 7 Criminal Law and Philosophy 351–365.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Allan C., Laughing at the Gods: Great Judges and How They Made the Common Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Iglesias Sánchez, Sara, “Hacia una nueva relación entre la nacionalidad estatal y la cuidadanía europea?” (2010) 37 Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 933–950.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael, The Ordinary Virtues: Moral Order in a Divided World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

International Bar Association, Report of the Task Force on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (2009).Google Scholar

Ioannidis, M., “Deference Criteria in WTO Law and the Case for a Procedural Approach,” in Gruszczynski, L. and Werner, W. (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 91.Google Scholar

Isin, Engin and Nielsen, Greg (eds.), Acts of Citizenship (New York: ZED Books, 2008).Google Scholar

Iwawata, Y., “Constitutional Problems Involved in Implementing the Uruguay Round in Japan,” in Jackson, John H. and Sykes, Alan O. (eds.), Implementing the Uruguay Round (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 137.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H., “The Great 1994 Sovereignty Debate: United States Acceptance and Implementation of the Uruguay Round Results,” in Jackson, John H., The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 367.Google Scholar

Japp, Klaus-Peter, “Zur Funktion der Menschenrechte in der Weltgesellschaft,” in Heintz, Bettina and Leisering, Britta (eds.), Menschenrechte in der Weltgesellschaft. Deutungswandel und Wirkungsweise eines globalen Leitwerts (Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2015), 65–97.Google Scholar

Jaremba, Urszula, National Judges as EU Law Judges: The Polish Civil Law System (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2014).Google Scholar

Jensen, Steven L. B., The Making of International Human Rights: The 1960s, Decolonization, and the Reconstruction of Global Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip, Transnational Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Jessurun d’Oliveira, Hans Ulrich, “Europees burgerschap: Dubbele nationaliteit?” in van Ballegooij, Wouter (ed.), Europees Burgerschap (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2004), 91.Google Scholar

Jessurun d’Oliveira, Hans Ulrich, “Ontkoppeling van nationaliteit en Unieburgerschap?” (2010) Nederlandsch Juristenblad 1028–1033.Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian and Neyer, Jurgen, “From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalization of Comitology,” (1997) 3 European Law Journal 273.Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian, Kjaer, Poul F., and Ralli, Tommi, “A New Type of Conflicts – Law as Constitutional Form in the Postnational Constellation,” (2011) 2 Transnational Legal Theory 153–166.Google Scholar

Johnson, Tana, Organizational Progeny: Why Governments Are Losing Control over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Joppke, Christian, Citizenship and Immigration (Cambridge: Polity, 2010).Google Scholar

Joppke, Christian, “The Instrumental Turn of Citizenship,” (2018) Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1–21.Google Scholar

Kalicki, Jean E. and Joubin-Bret, Anna (eds.), Reshaping the Investor–State Dispute Settlement System – Journeys for the 21st Century (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2015).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, available at archive.org.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Perpetual Peace, in Immanuel Kant, Political Writings, 2nd edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, Reis ed.), 93–130.Google Scholar

Kayaoglu, Turan, “The Extension of Westphalian Sovereignty: State Building and the Abolition of Extraterritoriality,” (2007) 51 International Studies Quarterly 649–675.Google Scholar

Keiler, Johannes and Roef, David (eds.), Comparative Concepts of Criminal Law, 2nd edn. (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2016).Google Scholar

Keitner, Chimène and Reisman, W. Michael, “Free Association: The United States Experience,” (2003) 39 Texas International Law Journal 1–64.Google Scholar

Kelemen, R. D., “The Dangers of Constitutional Pluralism,” in Avbelj, Matej and Davies, Gareth (eds.), Handbook on Legal Pluralism in the EU (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), 392–406.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (New York: Rinehart & Company Inc., 1952).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967, Knight, trans.).Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, A World of Struggle: How Power Law and Expertise Shape the Global Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Kenny, Mel, “Globalization, Interlegality and Europeanized Contract Law,” (2002) 21 Pennsylvania State International Law Review 569–620.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert, “Social Norms and Agency in Global Politics,” (2010) NYU Straus Institute Working Paper 7.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert and Victor, David, “The Regime Complex for Climate Change,” (2010) 10–33 Harvard Kennedy School, Discussion Paper, available at www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/Keohane_Victor_Final_2.pdf.Google Scholar

King, Jeff, The Doctrine of Odious Debts in International Law: A Restatement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, “Global Regulation and the New Jus Gentium,” draft paper, available at www.iilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Kingsbury-A-New-Jus-Gentium-2006.pdf.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, “The Concept of ‘Law’ in Global Administrative Law,” (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 23–57.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, “International Law as Inter-Public Law,” in Richardson, Henry R. and Williams, Melissa S. (eds.), Nomos XLIX: Moral Universalism and Pluralism, 167–204.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict and Donaldson, Megan, “From Bilateralism to Publicness in International Law,” in Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Paulus, Andreas, von Schorlemer, Sabine, and Vedder, Christoph (eds.), Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 79–89.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict and Krisch, Nico, “Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order,” (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 1–13.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, and Stewart, Richard B., “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law,” (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 15–62.Google Scholar

Kirk, Elizabeth, “The Ecosystem Approach and the Search for an Objective and Content for the Concept of Holistic Ocean Governance,” (2015) 46 Ocean Development and International Law 33–49.Google Scholar

Kjaer, Poul F., “Claim-Making and Parallel Universes: The Legal Pluralism of Church, State and Empire in Europe,” in Davies, Gareth and Avbelj, Matej (eds.), Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018), 11–21.Google Scholar

Kjaer, Poul, Constitutionalism in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Kjaer, Poul, “Constitutionalizing Connectivity: The Constitutional Grid of World Society,” 45 Journal of Law and Society 114–134.Google Scholar

Kjaer, Poul, Between Governing and Governance: On the Emergence, Function and Form of Europe’s Post-national Constellation (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar

Kjaer, Poul, “The Transnational Constitution of Europe’s Social Market Economies. A Question of Constitutional Imbalances?” (2018) 57 Journal of Common Market Studies, 143–158.Google Scholar

Kjaer, Poul, “Why Justification? The Structure of Public Power in Transnational Contexts,” (2017) 8 Transnational Legal Theory 8–21.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Constitutionalism as Theory,” in Dunoff, Jeff and Pollack, Mark (eds.), International Legal Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Doing Justice? Bureaucracy, the Rule of Law and Virtue Ethics,” (2017) 6 Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto 27–50.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “The EJIL Foreword: The Transformation of International Organizations Law,” (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 9–82.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Executing Mr Breard,” (1998) 67 Nordic Journal of International Law 357–364.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “In Defense of the Realm,” in Schütze, Robert and Tridimas, Takis (eds.), Oxford Principles of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 1208–1233.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Legal Education in the Balance: Accommodating Flexibility,” (2006) 56 Journal of Legal Education 196–200.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “The Passion and the Spirit: Albert Camus as Moral Politician,” (2016) 1 European Papers 13–28.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Principled Pragmatist? Bert Röling and the Emergence of International Criminal Law,” in Mégrét, Frédéric and Tallgren, Immi (eds.), The Dawn of a New Discipline (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “The Reception of International Law in the EU Legal Order,” in Schütze, Robert and Tridimas, Takis (eds.), Oxford Principles of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 1208–1233.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Setting the Scene,” in Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne, and Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 1–44.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “The Sources of International Organizations’ Law: Reflections on Accountability,” in Besson, Samantha and d‘Aspremont, Jean (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 987–1006.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Beyond the Vienna Convention: Conflicting Treaty Provisions,” in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 192–205.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne, and Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko, “Normative Pluralism: An Exploration,” in Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 13–34.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Knox, John, “A Presumption against Extrajurisdictionality,” (2010) 104 American Journal of International Law 351–396.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, “Annotation of Case C-135/08, Rottman,” (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review 1831–1846.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, Citizenship (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, “Citizenship of Personal Circumstances in Europe,” in Thym, Daniel (ed.), Reinventing European Citizenship (Oxford: Hart, 2017), 97–136.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, “Double Nationality in the EU: An Argument for Tolerance,” (2011) 17 European Law Journal 323–343.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, “Ius Tractum of Many Faces: European Citizenship and the Difficult Relationship between Status and Rights,” (2009) 15 Columbia Journal of European Law 169–238.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, “Neo-Mediaeval Permutations of Personhood in the European Union,” (2016) European University Institute Working Paper 13.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, “Pre-Accession, Naturalization, and ‘Due Regard to Community Law’: The European Union’s ‘Steering’ of Citizenship Policies in Candidate Countries During the Fifth Enlargement,” (2004) 4 Romanian Journal of Political Science 71–88.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, “A Real European Citizenship: A New Jurisdiction Test: A Novel Chapter in the Development of the Union in Europe,” (2011) 18 Columbia Journal of European Law 55–110.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, “Rounding Up the Circle: The Mutation of Member States’ Nationalities under Pressure from EU Citizenship,” (2010) 23 EUI RSCAS.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, “On Tiles and Pillars: EU Citizenship as a Federal Denominator,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 3–82.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry and Lindeboom, Justin, “Pluralism through Its Denial: The Success of EU Citizenship,” in Avbelj, Matej and Davies, Gareth (eds.), Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), 179–198.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry and Lindeboom, Justin, “Empirical Assessment of the Quality of Nationalities,” (2017) 4 European Journal of Comparative Law 314–336.Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry and Lindeboom, Justin (eds.), Henley and Partners – Kochenov Quality of Nationality Index, 3rd edn. (Zürich: Ideos, 2018).Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry and Belavusau, Uladzislau, “Kirchberg – Dispensing the Punishment: Inflicting ‘Civil Death’ on Prisoners in the Recent Case-Law,” (2016) 40 European Law Review 557–577.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, “The Relationship between the International and the Municipal Legal Order: Reflections on the Decision no 238/2014 of the Italian Constitutional Court,” (2014) Questions of International Law 5–16.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, “Short Reflections on the ICJ’s Whaling Case and the Review by International Courts and Tribunals of ‘Discretionary Powers’,” (2014) 132 Australian Yearbook of International Law 135–144.Google Scholar

Koller, David, “The End of Geography: The Changing Nature of the International System and the Challenge to International Law: A Reply to Daniel Bethlehem,” (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 25–29.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “Colonial Laws: Sources, Strategies and Lessons?” (2016) 18 Journal of the History of International Law 248–277.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “Empire and International Law: The Real Spanish Contribution,” (2011) 61 University of Toronto Law Journal 1–36.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission (Helsinki: Erik Castrén Institute, 2007).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “Global Governance and Public International Law,” (2004) 37 Kritische Justiz 241–254.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “Global Legal Pluralism: Multiple Regimes and Multiple Modes of Thought,” 5 March 2005, Lecture at Harvard University, available at www.helsinki.fi/eci/Publications/Koskenniemi.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “The Lady Doth Protest Too Much: Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law”. Reprinted in Koskenniemi, Martti (ed.), The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 112–130.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar

Kostakopoulou, Dora, “European Union Citizenship and Member State Nationality: Updating or Upgrading the Link,” in Shaw, Jo (ed.), Has the European Court of Justice Challenged the Member State Sovereignty in Nationality Law? (Florence: EUI Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies , 2011), 21–26.Google Scholar

Kotze, Louis, “Constitutional Conversations in the Anthropocene: In Search of Environmental Jus Cogens Norms,” (2015) 46 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 241–271.Google Scholar

Koutrakos, Panos, EU International Relations Law, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Hart, 2015).Google Scholar

Koutrakos, Panos, “The European Union in the Global Security Architecture,” in van Vooren, Bart, Blockmans, Steven, and Wouters, Jan (eds.), The EU’s Role in Global Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 81–94.Google Scholar

Koutrakos, Panos, “The Relevance of EU Law for Arbitral Tribunals: (Not) Managing the Lingering Tension,” (2016) 17 Journal of World Investment and Trade 873–894.Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, “The Reform of the Common Commercial Policy,” in Biondi, Andrea, Eeckhout, Piet, and Ripley, Stefanie (eds.), EU Law after Lisbon (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 292–311.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich, “Making Sense of ‘International Practices’,” in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) 36–60.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich, Praxis: On Acting and Knowing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich, “Re-Thinking Inter-Disciplinarity by Re-Reading Hume,” in Rajkovic, Nikolas, Aalberts, Tanja, and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas (eds.), The Power of Legality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich, Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich, The Status of Law in International Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, “The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods,” (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 1–40.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, “Who Is Afraid of Radical Pluralism? Legal Order and Political Stability in the Postnational Space,” (2011) 24 Ratio Juris 386–412.Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia, “Open Letter to Harlem Desir,” in Kristeva, Julia (ed.), Nations without Nationalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Küçük, Esin, “The Principle of Solidarity and Fairness in Sharing Responsibility: More than Window Dressing?” (2016) 22 European Law Journal 448–469.Google Scholar

Kuisma, Mikko, “Nordic Models of Citizenship: Lessons from Social History for Theorising Policy Change in the ‘Age of Globalisation’,” (2007) 12 New Political Economy 87–95.Google Scholar

Lacey, Nicola, In Search of Criminal Responsibility: Ideas, Interests and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law and Transnational Regulation,” (2011) NYU Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper 1.Google Scholar

Lamy, Pascal, “The Place of the WTO and Its Law in the International Legal Order,” (2007) 17 European Journal of International Law 7.Google Scholar

Larik, Joris, “EU Counter-Terrorism and the ‘Strict Observance of International Law: Sewing the Seamless Coat of Compliance’,” in Herlin-Karnell, Ester and Matera, Claudio (eds.), External Dimension of the EU Counter-terrorism Policy (2014) CLEER Working Paper 2.Google Scholar

Latu, Alex, “Public Procurement and Private Certification: The Case of the UK TPP,” (2013) Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy. Research Paper 53, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2360264.Google Scholar

Lautenbach, Geranne, The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford University Press, 2011 [1933]).Google Scholar

Lavranos, Nikolaos, “The Solange-Method as a Tool for Regulating Competing Jurisdictions among International Courts and Tribunals,” (2008) 30 Loyola Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review 275–334.Google Scholar

Le Golf, Pierrick, “Global Law: A Legal Phenomenon Emerging from the Process of Globalization,” (2007) 14 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 119–45.Google Scholar

Leebron, D., “Implementation of the Uruguay Round Results in the United States,” in Jackson, John H. and Sykes, Alan O. (eds.), Implementing the Uruguay Round (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 175.Google Scholar

Legendre, Pierre, Leçons X, Dogma: Instituer l’Animal Humain (Paris: Fayard 2017).Google Scholar

Legrand, Pierre, Fragments on Law as Culture (Deventer: Tjeenk Willink, 1999).Google Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen and Verhoeven, Amaryllis, “Institutional Balance as a Guarantee for Democracy in EU Governance,” in Joerges, Christian and Dehousse, Renaud (eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 35.Google Scholar

Lester, Anthony, “Thirty Years On: The East African Case Revisited,” (2002) 47 Public Law 52–72.Google Scholar

Letsas, George, “Harmonic Law: The Case against Legal Pluralism,” in Dickson, Julie and Eleftheriadis, Pavlos (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 77–108.Google Scholar

Lhuilier, Gilles, Le Droit Transnational (Paris: Dalloz, 2016).Google Scholar

Liberski-Bagnoud, Danouta, Les Dieux du Territoire – Penser Autrement la Généalogie (Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique/Édition de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, 2002).Google Scholar

Liberski-Bagnoud, Danouta, “Règne de la loi, régime des interdits,” in Longo, Giuseppe (ed.), Loi des Dieux, des Hommes et de la Nature (Paris: Fayard, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Liivoja, Rain, “Book Review of Jurisdiction in International Law by Cedric Ryngaert,” (2008) 19 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 397–401.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin, “The Misconceived Search for Global Law,” (2017) 8 Transnational Legal Theory 353–359.Google Scholar

Loureiro Bastos, Fernando, “Some Notes on the Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2011 of the Sea-Bed Disputes Chamber. Are We in the Presence of a Glimpse of the Future Evolution of the Jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea?” in Hereira, José Manuel Sobrino (ed.), The Contribution of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to Good Governance of the Oceans and Seas, Vol. 1, (Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2014), 343–362.Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, “Jurisdiction,” in Evans, Malcolm (ed.), International Law, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 335–360.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas, “International Litigation and the Quest for Reasonableness: General Course on Private International Law,” (1994) 245 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 1–319.Google Scholar

Lowry, Michele and Luedemann, Susanne (eds.), Exemplarity and Singularity: Thinking through Particulars in Philosophy, Literature and Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Luban, David, Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Luban, David and Wendel, W. Bradley, “Philosophical Legal Ethics: An Affectionate History,” (2017) 30 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 337–364.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Soziale Systeme (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984).Google Scholar

Luther, Martin, De Servo Arbitrio, available at chapellibrary.org.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, “Beyond the Sovereign State,” (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 1–18.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, “Risking Constitutional Collision in Europe?” (1998) 18 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 517–532.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, “The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now,” (1995) 1 European Law Journal 259–66.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edn. (London: Duckworth, 1985).Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask, “Sociological Approaches to International Courts,” in Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J., and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 388–412.Google Scholar

Magnus, Albertus, Summa de Bono, available at www.albertus-magnus-online.de.Google Scholar

Maier, Hans Gerhard, “Extraterritorial Jurisdiction at a Crossroads: An Intersection between Public and Private International Law,” (1982) 76 American Journal of International Law 280–320.Google Scholar

Maier, Hans Gerhard, “Jurisdictional Rules in Customary International Law,” in Meessen, Karl Matthias (ed.), Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Theory and Practice (London: Kluwer, 1996), 64–74.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry S., Ancient Law (1917 edn., Project Gutenberg, 2007).Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico, The European Community as a Regulatory State (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1995).Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico, Regulating Europe (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine, “L’enjeu de protection de l’environnement dans l’exploration et l’exploitatione de la Zone: l’apport de l’avis de la Chambre du Tribunal international du droit de la mer du 1er Février 2011,” (2011) 16 Annuaire du Droit de la Mer 367–380.Google Scholar

Mann, Frederick A., “The Doctrine of International Jurisdiction Revisited after Twenty Years,” (1984) 186 Recueil des Cours 1–116.Google Scholar

Mann, Frederick A., “The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law,” (1964) 111 Recueil des Cours 1–162.Google Scholar

Manning, Patrick, “The Slave Trade: ‘The Formal Demographics of a Global System’,” in Inikori, Joseph E. and Engerman, Stanley L. (eds.), The Atlantic Slave Trade: Effects on Economies, Societies and Peoples in Africa, the Americas, and Europe (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992), 117–44.Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle, “A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition against ‘Clinical Isolation’ in WTO Dispute Settlement,” (1999) 33 Journal of World Trade 87.Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle, “Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Jurisdictions: The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and the MEAs and Other Treaties,” (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade 1081–1131.Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle, “The Primacy of the WTO Dispute Settlement System,” (2015) Questions of International Law 23.Google Scholar

Markesinis, Basil and Fedke, Jorg, Engaging with Foreign Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar

Markesinis, Basil and Fedke, Jorg, Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law: A New Source of Inspiration? (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Marshall, Thomas H., Class, Citizenship, and Social Development (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Martin-Bidou, Pascale, “L’affaire de la chasse à la balaine dans l’Antarctique: droit des traités ou protection des especes?” (2015) 119 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 403–417.Google Scholar

Martinez, Jenny, The Slave Trade and the Origins of International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Martini, Chiara, “‘States’ Control Over New International Organization,” (2006) 6 Global Jurist Advances 1–25.Google Scholar

Martinico, Giuseppe and Pollicino, Oreste, The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems: Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).Google Scholar

Maupin, Julie, “Transparency in International Investment Law: The Good, the Bad, and the Murky,” in Bianchi, Andrea and Peters, Anne (eds.), Transparency in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 142–171.Google Scholar

Mazower, Mark, Governing the World. The History of an Idea: 1815 to the Present (London: Penguin, 2013).Google Scholar

Mbengue, Makane, “Between Law and Science: A Commentary on the Whaling in the Antarctic Case,” (2015) 14 Questions of International Law 3–12.Google Scholar

McGinnis, John O., “The Appropriate Hierarchy of Global Multilateralism and Customary International Law: The Example of the WTO,” (2003) 42 Virginia Journal of International Law 229.Google Scholar

McLachlan, Campbell, Lis Pendens in International Litigation (The Hague: Hague Academy of International Law, 2009).Google Scholar

Mégrét, Frédéric, “International Judges and Experts’ Impartiality and the Problem of Past Declarations,” (2011) 10 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 31–66.Google Scholar

Meili, Friedrich, Die internationalen Unionen über das Recht der Weltverkehrsanstalten und des gesitigen Eigentums (Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1889).Google Scholar

Mengozzi, Paolo, “Private International Law and the WTO Law,” (2001) 292 Recueil des Cours 249.Google Scholar

Merli, R., Lucchetti, M. C., Preziosi, M., and Arcese, G., “Motivations behind the EMAS Stagnation and Enabling Measures to Stimulate New Registrations: Characterization of Public Administrations and Private-Owned Organizations,” (2017) available at www.advancesincleanerproduction.net/sixth/files/sessoes/6B/8/merli_r_et_al_academic.pdf.Google Scholar

Michaels, Ralf, “Law and Recognition: Towards a Relational Concept of Law,” in Roughan, Nicole and Halpin, Andrew (eds.), In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Michaels, Ralf, “Territorial Jurisdiction after Territoriality,” in Slot, Piet Jan and Bultermann, Mielle (eds.), Globalisation and Jurisdiction (Leiden: Kluwer, 2004), 105–130.Google Scholar

Milanovic, Branko, Global Inequality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko, ICJ Decides the Whaling in the Antarctic Case: Australia Wins, EJILTalk!, 31 March 2014.Google Scholar

Miller, David, “Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification,” (2012) 60 Political Studies 252–68.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew D., “Good Faith in WTO Dispute Settlement,” (2006) 7 Melbourne Journal of International Law 339–371.Google Scholar

Mitsilegas, Valsamis, “The European Union and the Global Governance of Crime,” in Mitsilegas, Valsamis, Alldridge, Peter, and Cheliotis, Leonidis (eds.), Globalisation, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Hart, 2015), 153–198.Google Scholar

Mitsilegas, Valsamis, “Managing Legal Diversity in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice: The Role of Autonomous Concepts,” in Colson, Renaud and Field, Stewart (eds.), EU Criminal Justice and the Challenges of Diversity. Legal Cultures in the Area of Freedom, Security and justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 125–159.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, , L’Esprit des Lois in Montesquieu, Oeuvres Complètes, Vol. 2 (Paris: Gallimard La Pléiade, 1951).Google Scholar

Montesquieu, , My Thoughts (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2012, Clark, trans.).Google Scholar

Moore, Sally Falk, “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study,” (1973) 7 Law and Society Review 719–743.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J., La Réalité des Normes: En Particulier Normes du Droit International. Fondement d’une Théorie des Norms (Paris: Félix Alcan, 1934).Google Scholar

Mowbray, Alastair, “Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights,” (2015) 15 Human Rights Law Review 313–341.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Neuman, Gerald, “Fédéralisme et citoyenneté aux Etats Unis et dans l’Union européenne,” (2003) 21 Critique Internationale 161–169.Google Scholar

Ninatti, S., “How Do Our Judges Conceive of Democracy? The Democratic Nature of the Community Decision-Making Process under Scrutiny of the European Court of Justice,” Jean Monnet Working Paper 10/03.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, “Inside or Out: Two Types of International Legal Pluralism,” in Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 220–239.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, “International Adjudication of Global Public Goods: The Intersection of Substance and Procedure,” (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 769–791.Google Scholar

Note, “Constructing the State Extraterritorially: Jurisdictional Discourse, the National Interest, and Transnational Norms,” (1990) 103 Harvard Law Review 1273–1305.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Charlotte, “I Trade Therefore I Am,” (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 1643–1684.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora, “The Dark Side of Human Rights,” in Christiano, Thomas and Christman, John (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy (Chichester: Blackwell-Wiley, 2009), 425–436.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael, “Rationalism in Politics,” reproduced in Oakeshott, Michael (ed.), Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (London: Methuen and Co., 1962), 1–36.Google Scholar

Oakley, Justin and Cocking, Dean, Virtue Ethics and Professional Roles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Oellers-Frahm, Karin, “Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdictions: Problems and Possible Solutions,” (2001) 5 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 67–104.Google Scholar

Oomen, Barbara, Davis, Martha F., and Grigolo, Michele, Global Urban Justice: The Rise of Human Rights Cities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Osterhammel, Jurgen (ed.), Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview, 2nd edn. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Padovani, Tullio, “Il crepuscolo della legalità nel processo penale. Riflessioni antistoriche sulle dimensioni processuali della legalità penale,” (1999) 2 L’Indice Penale 527–543.Google Scholar

Palombella, Gianluigi, “The (Re-)Constitution of the Public in a Global Arena,” in MacAmlaigh, Cormac, Michelon, Claudio, and Walker, Neil (eds.), After Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 286–308.Google Scholar

Palombella, Gianluigi, E Possibile una Legalità Globale? Il Rule of Law e la Governance del Mondo (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2012).Google Scholar

Palombella, Gianluigi, “German War Crimes and the Rule of International Law,” (2016) 14 Journal of International Criminal Justice 607–613.Google Scholar

Palombella, Gianluigi, “Global Law and the Law on the Globe,” (2012) 1 Italian Journal of Public Law 53–92.Google Scholar

Palombella, Gianluigi, “Senza identità. Dal diritto internazionale alla Corte costituzionale tra consuetudine, Jus cogens e principi ‘supremi’,” (2015) 35 Quaderni Costituzionali 815–30.Google Scholar

Palombella, Gianluigi, “The Principled and Winding Road to Al Dulimi: Interpreting the Interpreters,” (2014) Questions of International Law 16.Google Scholar

Palombella, Gianluigi, “The Rule of Law as an Institutional Ideal,” in Morlino, Leonardo and Palombella, Gianluigi (eds.), Rule of Law and Democracy. Internal and External Issues (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 1–37.Google Scholar

Palombella, Gianluigi, “The Rule of Law at Home and Abroad,” (2016) 8 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1–23.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott, The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers (New York: Free Press, 1968 [1937]).Google Scholar

Pascal, Blaise, Thoughts, Vol. 48 (New York: P.F. Collier and Son Company, 1909).Google Scholar

Paulus, Andreas, “National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Remarks on the Book by André Nollkaemper),” (2012) 4 Jerusalem Review Legal Studies 5–18.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Pavlakos, George and Pauwelyn, Joost, “Principled Monism and the Normative Conception of Coercion under International Law,” in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), Beyond the Established Legal Orders: Policy Interconnections between the EU and the Rest of the World (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 317–341.Google Scholar

Payandeh, Mehrdad, “The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of H.L.A. Hart,” (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 967–995.Google Scholar

Payne, Cymie, “Biodiversity in High Seas Areas: An Integrated Legal Approach,” (2017) 21 American Society of International Law Insights.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, “How to Make the Best out of Sentenza no. 238 of the Italian Constitutional Court for a Global Legal Order,” available at https://verfassungsblog.de/let-not-triepel-triumph-make-best-sentenza-no-238-italian-constitutional-court-global-legal-order-2.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, “Humanity as the A and Ω of Sovereignty,” (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 513–544.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, “The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization,” (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 671–704.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, “Human Rights and International Economic Law in the 21st Century: The Need to Clarify Their Interrelationships,” (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law 3.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, “Human Rights, International Economic Law and ‘Constitutional Justice’,” (2008) 18 European Journal of International Law 769.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Pineschi, Laura, “The Duty of Environmental Impact Assessment in the First ITLOS Chamber’s Advisory Opinion: Toward the Supremacy of the General Rule to Protect and Preserve the Marine Environment as a Common Value?” in Boschiero, Nerina, Pitea, Cesare, Ragni, Chiara, and Scovazzi, Tullio (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), 425–439.Google Scholar

Pitea, Cesare, “Multiplication and Overlap of Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms: Towards Better Coordination?” in Treves, Tullio, Pineschi, Laura, Tanzi, Attila, Pitea, Cesare, Ragni, Chiara, and Jacur, Francesca Romanin (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009), 439–450.Google Scholar

Plakokefalos, Ilias, “Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area,” (2011) 24 Journal of Environmental Law 133–143.Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas, “Fighting Global Poverty,” (2017) 13 International Journal of Law in Context 512–526.Google Scholar

Poisel, Tim, “Deep Seabed Mining: Implications of Seabed Disputes Chamber’s Advisory Opinion,” (2012) 19 Australian International Law Journal 212–233.Google Scholar

Polakiewicz, Jörg, “International Law and Domestic (Municipal) Law, Law and Decisions of International Organizations and Courts,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Pomponius, Digest, available at https://droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/Anglica/D1_Scott.htm#XIV.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric, “Liberal Internationalism and the Populist Backlash,” (2017) University of Chicago Public Law Working Paper 606.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric and Vermeule, Adrian, “The Votes of Other Judges,” (2016) 105 Georgetown Law Journal 159–190.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard, How Judges Think (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Post, Robert, “The Challenge of Globalization to American Public Law Scholarship,” (2001) 2 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 323–336.Google Scholar

Powell, Jefferson H., Constitutional Conscience: The Moral Dimension of Judicial Decision (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Pulkowski, Dirk, The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary, Ethics without Ontology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Radbruch, Gustav, Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft, 13th edn. (Stuttgart: Koehler Verlag, 1980, Zweigert, ed.).Google Scholar

Ragni, Chiara, “Interpretazione dei trattati e standard of review nella giurisprudenza della Corte internazionale di giustizia: riflessioni sull’affare della caccia alla balena nell’Antartico,” (2014) Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 725–760.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal, “Empire and Extraterritoriality in Twentieth Century America,” (2011) 40 Southwestern Law Review 605–615.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal, “Governing the Internet,” (2016) 110 American Journal of International Law 491–503.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David, “The Regime Complex of Plant Genetic Resources,” (2004) 58 International Organization 277–309.Google Scholar

Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1979).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception,” (2006) 90 Minnesota Law Review 1003–1044.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Why the State,” (2014) King’s College London Dickson Poon School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series 38.Google Scholar

Reinisch, August, “Articles 30 and 59 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in Action: The Decisions on Jurisdiction in the Eastern Sugar and Eureko Investment Arbitrations,” (2012) 39 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 157–177.Google Scholar

Reinisch, August, “The Proliferation of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: The Threat of Fragmentation vs. the Promise of a More Effective System? – Some Reflections from the Perspective of Investment Arbitration,” in Buffard, Isabelle, Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 107–125.Google Scholar

Repetto, Giorgio (ed.), The Constitutional Relevance of the ECHR in Domestic and European Law: An Italian Perspective (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2013).Google Scholar

Robert-Cuendet, Sabrina, “Responsabilités et obligations des États qui patronnent des personnes et des entités dans le cadre d’activités menées dans la Zone,” (2011) 57 Annuaire Français de Droit International 439–476.Google Scholar

Roberts, Anthea “Pledging American Exceptionalism? US Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch on International Law,” available at http://opiniojuris.org/2017/05/23/33125.Google Scholar

Robinson, Paul H., “Four Distinctions that Glanville Williams Did Not Make: The Practical Benefits of Examining the Interrelation among Criminal Law Doctrines,” in Baker, Dennis J. and Horder, Jeremy (eds.), The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: The Legacy of Glanville Williams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 106–125.Google Scholar

Robinson, Paul H., Garvey, Stephen P., and Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Rödl, Florian, “Democratic Juridification without Statisation: Law of Conflict of Laws Instead of a World State,” (2011) 2 Transnational Legal Theory 193–213.Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy (New York: W. W. Norton, 2011).Google Scholar

Roele, Isabel, “The Vicious Circle of Habermas’ Cosmopolitanism,” (2014) 25 Law and Critique 199–229.Google Scholar

Röling, B. V. A. and Cassese, Antonio, The Tokyo Trial and Beyond (Cambridge: Polity, 1993).Google Scholar

Rolland, Sonia, “Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand Intervening),” (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 496–502.Google Scholar

Rothwell, Donald and Stephens, Tim, “The Regulation of Southern Ocean Whaling: What Role for the Antarctic Treaty System?” (2009) The University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper 09.Google Scholar

Roughan, Nicole, Authorities: Conflict, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Roughan, Nicole, “Mind the Gaps: Authority and Legality in International Law,” (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 329–335.Google Scholar

Rubenstein, Kim and Adler, Daniel, “International Citizenship: The Future of Nationality in a Globalized World,” (2000) 7 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 519–548.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,” (1993) 47 International Organization 139–174.Google Scholar

Rundle, Kristen, “The Impossibility of an Exterminatory Legality: Law and the Holocaust,” (2009) 59 University of Toronto Law Journal 65–126.Google Scholar

Russo, Deborah, “Addressing the Relation between Treaties by Means of ‘Saving Clauses’,” (2015) 85 British Yearbook of International Law 1–9.Google Scholar

Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan (eds.), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Sacco, Rodolfo, “Diversity and Uniformity in the Law,” (2001) 49 American Journal of Comparative Law 171–190.Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech, “Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments,” (2009) 9 Human Rights Law Review 397–453.Google Scholar

Sajó, András, “Liberty and its Competitors,” in Uitz, Renata (ed.), Freedom and Its Enemies: The Tragedy of Liberty (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar

Sajó, András and Uitz, Renata, The Constitution of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Sajó, András and Giuliano, Sergio, “Is the Decline of Globalization the End of Human Rights (as We Believe to Know Them)?” (2017) Annuario di Diritto Comparato e Studi Legislativi 517–536.Google Scholar

Salamanca Agaudo, Esther, “La contribución de la opinión consultiva de la Sala de controverdsias de fondos marinos del Tribunal internacional del derecho del mar a la interpretación y aplicación de la Parte XI de la Convención de Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del mar de 1982 y su Acuerdo de 1994,” in Sobrino Hereira, José Manuel (ed.), The Contribution of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to Good Governance of the Oceans and Seas, Vol. 1, (Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2014), 385–406.Google Scholar

Sartre, Jean Paul, “Existentialism is a Humanism,” in Kaufman, Walter (ed.), Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre (New York: Plume Books, 1975).Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, “The State and Globalization,” in Bruce Hall, Rodney and Biersteker, Thomas J. (eds.), The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 91–113.Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Savino, Mario, “Linkages between Global Regimes and Interactions with Civil Society,” in Cassese, Sabino (ed.), Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 131–152.Google Scholar

Schabas, William, The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Schaltegger, Stephan, Bennett, Martin, Burritt, Roger L., and Jasch, Christine (eds.), Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production (Heidelberg: Springer, 2008).Google Scholar

Schiek, Dagmar, “Perspectives on Social Citizenship in the EU,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 341–370.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Rudolph (ed.), Schlesinger’s Comparative Law. Cases–Text–Materials, 4th edn. (Mineola NY: The Foundation Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Der Nomos der Erde. Im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1950).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Ex Captivitate Salus: Experiences, 1945–1947 (Cambridge: Polity, 2017, Hannah, trans.).Google Scholar

Schönberger, Christoph, “European Citizenship as Federal Citizenship,” (2007) 19 European Review of Public Law 61–81.Google Scholar

Schönberger, Christoph, Unionsbürger. Europas föderales Bürgerrecht in vergleichender Sicht (Heidelberg: Mohr Siebeck, 2006).Google Scholar

Schultz, Thomas “Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Private/Public International Law Interface,” (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 799–839.Google Scholar

Schultz, Thomas Transnational Legality: Stateless Law and International Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Schütze, Robert, “The ‘Succession Doctrine’ and the European Union,” in Arnull, Anthony, Barnard, Catherine, Dougan, Michael, and Spaventa, Eleanor (eds.), A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in Honour of Alan Dashwood (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 459–484.Google Scholar

Scoditti, Enrico, “Corti e Carte dei diritti,” (2013) 2 Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto 379–400.Google Scholar

Scott, James C., Seeing like a State (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Scott Joanne, , “The GATT and Community Law: Rethinking the ‘Regulatory Gap’,” in Shaw, Jo and More, Gillian (eds.), New Legal Dynamics of European Union (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 147.Google Scholar

Scott Joanne, , “The New EU ‘Extraterritoriality’,” (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 1343–1380.Google Scholar

Scott, Karen, “International Environmental Governance: Managing Fragmentation through Institutional Connection,” (2011) 12 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1–40.Google Scholar

Scovazzi, Tullio, “Between Law and Science: Some Considerations Inspired by the Whaling in the Antarctic Judgment,” (2015) 14 Questions of International Law 13–30.Google Scholar

Searle, John, Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Searle, John, The Construction of Social Reality (London: Penguin, 1995).Google Scholar

Selznick, Philip, “Sociology and Natural Law,” (1961) 6 Natural Law Forum 84–108.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, The Idea of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Senden, Linda, “Soft Law and Its Implications for Institutional Balance in the EC,” (2005) 1 Utrecht Law Review 79.Google Scholar

Shachar, Ayelet, The Birthright Lottery (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, “International Law and Global Public Goods in a Legal Pluralist World,” (2012) 12 European Journal of International Law 669–693.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory and Ginsburg, Tom, “The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship,” (2012) 106 American Journal of International Law 1–46.Google Scholar

Shamir-Borer, Eran, “Legitimacy without Authority in Global Standardisation Governance: The Case of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO),” in Cassese, S. et al. (eds.), Global Administrative Law: The Casebook (e-book, 2012), available at www.irpa.eu/en/gal-section/global-administrative-law-the-casebook-2.Google Scholar

Shany, Yuval, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Shany, Yuval, The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin, “The Globalization of Law,” (1993) 1 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 37–64.Google Scholar

Sherman, Gordon E., “Jus Gentium and International Law,” (1918) 12 American Journal of International Law 56–63.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith, Legalism: Law Morals and Political Trials (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Simester, Andrew, Du Bois-Pedain, Antije, and Neumann, Ulfrid (eds.), Liberal Criminal Theory: Essays for Andreas von Hirsch (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar

Simon Thomas, Marc, The Challenge of Legal Pluralism: Local Dispute Settlement and the Indian-State Relationship in Ecuador (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar

Simon, Roberts, “After Government? On Representing Law without the State,” (2005) 68 Modern Law Review 1–24.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Guy Fiti, To Reform the World: International Organizations and the Making of Modern States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Sironi, Alice, “Nationality of Individuals in Public International Law,” in Forlati, Serena and Annoni, Alessandra (eds.), The Changing Role of Nationality in International Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014), 54–76.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin, Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Skordas, Achilles, “Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit as Comity and the Disquiet of Neoformalism: A Response to Jan Klabbers,” in Koutrakos, Panos (ed.), European Foreign Policy: Legal and Political Perspectives (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 115–144.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, “Judicial Globalization,” (2000) 40 Virginia Journal of International Law 1103–1124.Google Scholar

Smiley, Marion, Moral Responsibility and the Boundaries of Community (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Snyder, Francis, “The Construction of Relations between Sites of Governance: The European Courts and WTO Law,” in Snyder, Francis (ed.), The EU, the WTO and China: Legal Pluralism and International Trade Regulation (Oxford: Hart, 2010), 151–208.Google Scholar

Solum, Lawrence B., “A Virtue-Centered Account of Equity and the Rule of Law,” in Farrelly, Colin and Solum, Lawrence B. (eds.), Virtue Jurisprudence (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008), 142–166.Google Scholar

Song, Nianshen, “‘Tributary’ from a Multilateral and Multilayered Perspective,” (2012) 5 Chinese Journal of International Politics 155–182.Google Scholar

Sousa, Pedro Caro, “Is a Unified Approach to EU Fundamental Freedoms Justified?” (2014) 20 European Law Journal 499–519.Google Scholar

Spano, Robert, “Universality or Diversity of Human Rights? Strasbourg in the Age of Subsidiarity,” (2014) 14 Human Rights Law Review 487–502.Google Scholar

Spiro, Peter J., At Home in Two Countries (New York: New York University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Spiro, Peter J., “Dual Nationality and the Meaning of Citizenship,” (1997) 46 Emory Law Journal 1411–1486.Google Scholar

Spiro, Peter J., “Stakeholder Theory Won’t Save Citizenship,” in Baubock, Rainer et al. (eds.), Democratic Inclusion (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017), 204–224.Google Scholar

Staker, Christopher, “Jurisdiction,” in Evans, Malcolm (ed.), International Law, 4th ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 309–335.Google Scholar

Steger, Debra, “Canadian Interpretation of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization,” in Jackson, John H. and Sykes, Alan O. (eds.), Implementing the Uruguay Round (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 243.Google Scholar

Stephan, Paul, “Competing Sovereignty and Laws’ Domains,” (2017) Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper 4.Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B., “Global Standards for National Societies,” in Cassese, Sabino (ed.), Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 175–196.Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B. and Badin, Michelle Ratton Sanchez, “The World Trade Organization and Global Administrative Law,” (2009) NYU Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper 7.Google Scholar

Strik, Philip, Shaping the Single European Market in the Field of Foreign Direct Investment (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar

Strumia, Francesca, “Citizenship and Free Movement: European and American Features of a Judicial Formula for Increased Comity,” (2006) 12 Columbia Journal of European Law 713–750.Google Scholar

Supiot, Alain, Homo Juridicus: Essai sur la Fonction Anthropologique du Droit (Paris: Points, 2005).Google Scholar

Supiot, Alain, “L’inscription territoriale des lois,” (2008) 11 Esprit 151–170.Google Scholar

Supiot, Alain, “The Territorial Inscription of Laws,” in Calliess, Graf-Peter, Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, Wielsch, Dan, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag am 30. April 2009 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009), 375–393.Google Scholar

Surak, Kristin, “Global Citizenship 2.0. The Growth of Citizenship by Investment Programs,” (2016) Investment Migration Working Paper 3.Google Scholar

Szpunar, Maciej and López, Maria Esther Blas, “Some Reflections on Member State Nationality: A Prerequisite of EU Citizenship and an Obstacle to Its Enjoyment,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 107–124.Google Scholar

Tabau, Anne-Sophie and Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine, “Non-Compliance Mechanisms: Interaction between the Kyoto Protocol System and the European Union,” (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 749–763.Google Scholar

Taekema, Sanne, “Fragments and Continuities of Law and ICT: A Pragmatist Approach to Understanding Legal Pluralism,” in de Been, Wouter, Arora, Payal, and Hildebrandt, Mireille (eds.), Crossroads in New Media, Identity and Law: The Shape of Diversity to Come, (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 80–92.Google Scholar

Taekema, Sanne, “Private Law as an Open Legal Order: Understanding Contract and Tort as Interactional Law,” (2014) 43 Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 140–149.Google Scholar

Taekema, Sanne and van der Burg, Wibren, “Towards a Fruitful Cooperation between Legal Philosophy, Legal Sociology and Doctrinal Research: How Legal Interactionism May Bridge Unproductive Oppositions,” in Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David (eds.), Law, Society and Community: Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014), 129–145.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Yoshifumi, “Obligations and Liability of Sponsoring States Concerning Activities in the Area: Reflections on the ITLOS Advisory Opinion on 1 February 2011,” (2013) 60 Netherlands International Law Review 205–230.Google Scholar

Tancredi, Antonello, “OMC et coutume(s),” in Tomkiewicz, Vincent (ed.), Les Sources et les Normes dans le Droit de l’OMC (Paris: Pedone, 2012), 81.Google Scholar

Tancredi, Antonello, “On the Absence of Direct Effect of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body’s Decisions in the EU Legal Order,” in Cannizzaro, Enzo, Palchetti, Paolo, and Wessel, Ramses (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), 249.Google Scholar

Taylor, Peter James, “The State as Container: Territoriality in the Modern World-System,” (1994) 18 Progress in Human Geography 151–162.Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti, Humanity’s Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti, Transitional Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Terris, Daniel, Romano, Cesare, and Swigart, Leigh, The International Judge: An Introduction to the Men and Women Who Decide the World’s Cases (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, “Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society,” in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Global Law without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997), 3–28.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, “Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergencies,” (1998) 61 Modern Law Review 11–32.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Global Law without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997).Google Scholar

Timmermans, Christiaan W. A., “Lifting the Veil of Union Citizens’ Rights,” in Colneric, Ninon et al. (eds.), Festschrift für Gil Carlos Rodríguez Iglesias (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2003), 195–206.Google Scholar

Toner, Helen, “Case C-192/99, R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Kaur,” (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 881–893.Google Scholar

Toth, Orsolya, The Lex Mercatoria in Theory and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Toulmin, Stephen J., The Place of Reason in Ethics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986 [1950]).Google Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P., “Bananas, Direct Effect and Compliance,” (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 660.Google Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P., “The Domain of WTO Law,” (1999) 40 Harvard International Law Journal 333.Google Scholar

Treves, Tullio, “Vue d’ensemble sur l’avis consultatif du 1er Février 2011,” (2011) Annuaire du Droit de la Mer 343–350.Google Scholar

Triepel, Heinrich, Völkerrecht und Landesrecht (Leipzig: Hirschfeld, 1899).Google Scholar

Trnavci, Genc, “The Meaning and Scope of the Law of Nations in the Context of the Alien Tort Claims Act and International Law,” (2005) 26 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 193–266.Google Scholar

Trubek, David and Cottrell, Patrick, “Robert Hudec and the Theory of International Economic Law: The Law of Global Space in Developing Countries,” in Thomas, Chantal and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds.), Developing Countries in the WTO Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 129–150.Google Scholar

Tryfonidou, Alina, “Redefining the Outer Boundaries of EU Law: The Zambrano, McCarthy and Dereci Trilogy,” (2012) 18 European Public Law 493–526.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Twining, William, “Diffusion and Globalization Discourse,” (2006) 47 Harvard International Law Journal 507.Google Scholar

Twining, William, Globalisation and Legal Scholarship (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2009).Google Scholar

Twining, William, Globalisation and Legal Theory (London: Butterworths, 2000).Google Scholar

Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Unger, Roberto Mangabeira, What Should Legal Analysis Become? (London: Verso, 1996).Google Scholar

Valverde, Mariana, Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

van der Burg, Wibren, The Dynamics of Law and Morality. A Pluralist Account of Legal Interactionism (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014).Google Scholar

van der Mei, Anne P., “Freedom of Movement for Indigents: A Comparative Analysis of American Constitutional Law and European Community Law,” (2002) 19 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 803–862.Google Scholar

van Domselaar, Iris, The Fragility of Rightness: Adjudication and the Primacy of Practice (doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2014).Google Scholar

van Domselaar, Iris, “Moral Quality in Adjudication: On Judicial Virtues and Civic Friendship,” (2015) 44 Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 24–46.Google Scholar

van Domselaar, Iris, “A Neo-Aristotelian Notion of Reciprocity: About Civic Friendship and (the Troublesome Character of) Right Judicial Decision,” in Huppes-Cluysenaer, Liesbeth and Coelho, Nuno M.M.S. (eds.), Aristotle and the Philosophy of Law: Theory, Practice and Justice (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), 223–248.Google Scholar

van Elsuwege, Peter, “Shifting Boundaries? European Union Citizenship and the Scope of Application of EU Law,” (2011) 38 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 263–276.Google Scholar

van Hoof, Luc, “Fisheries Management, the Ecosystem Approach, Regionalisation and the Elephants in the Room,” (2015) 60 Marine Policy, 20–26.Google Scholar

van Rossum, Wibo, “Religious Courts alongside Secular State Courts: The Case of the Turkish Alevis,” (2008) 2 Social Justice & Global Development Journal.Google Scholar

Varella, Marcelo D., Internationalization of Law: Globalization, International Law and Complexity (Berlin: Springer, 2014).Google Scholar

Varese, Federico, Mafias on the Move. How Organized Crime Conquers New Territories (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Veitch, Scott, Law and Irresponsibility: On the Legitimation of Human Suffering (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Verdross, Alfred, “Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law,” (1966) 60 American Journal of International Law 55–63.Google Scholar

Visek, Richard C., “Creating Ethnic Electorate through Legal Restorationism: Citizenship Rights in Estonia,” (1997) 38 Harvard International Law Journal 315–374.Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik, “Competition and Complementarity between Global and Regional Human Rights Institutions,” (2017) 8 Global Policy 119–123.Google Scholar

von Liszt, Friedrich‚ Gutachten für die internationale kriminalistische Vereinigung,” (1893), reprinted in von Liszt, Friedrich (ed.), Strafrechtliche Aufsätze und Vorträge, Vol. II (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1905).Google Scholar

Voronina, Natalia, “‘Sojuznoje gosudarstvo Rossija – Belarus’: opyt pravovogo regulirovanija,” (2013) 3 NB: Mezhdunarodnoje Parvo 52.Google Scholar

Wagner, Markus, “Regulatory Space in International Trade Law and International Investment Law,” (2015) 35 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 57.Google Scholar

Waibel, Michael et al. (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (The Hague: Kluwer, 2010).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “The Core Case against Judicial Review,” (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal 1346–1406.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium,” (2005) 119 Harvard Law Review 129–147.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “International Law: ‘A Relatively Small and Unimportant’ Part of Jurisprudence?” (2013) NYU Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers 427.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “Ius Gentium: A Defense of Gentili’s Equation of the Law of Nations and the Law of Nature,” (2008) Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series 08/34.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “Legal Pluralism and the Contrast between Hart’s Jurisprudence and Fuller’s,” in Cane, Peter (ed.), The Hart–Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “Special Ties and Natural Justice,” (1993) 22 Philosophy and Public Affairs 3–30.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil, “Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders,” (2006) 8 International Constitutional Law Journal 373–396.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil, Intimations of Global Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Wang, Dong, “The Discourse of Unequal Treaties in Modern China,” (2003) 76 Pacific Affairs 399–425.Google Scholar

Warbrick, Colin, “The Jurisdiction of the Security Council: Original Intention and New World Order(s),” in Capps, Patrick, Evans, Malcolm, and Konstadinidis, Stratos (eds.), Asserting Jurisdiction: International and European Perspectives (Oxford: Hart, 2003), 127–143.Google Scholar

Web, Philippa, International Judicial Integration and Fragmentation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Weil, Patrick, The Sovereign Citizen (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H., “The Geology of International Law: Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy,” (2004) 64 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 547–562.Google Scholar

Weinrib, Ernest J., The Idea of Private Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Wenk, Michael S., The European Union’s Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005).Google Scholar

Whelan, Frederick, “Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem,” in Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy (1983) 13–47.Google Scholar

White, Jonathan, “Authority after Emergency Rule,” (2015) 78 Modern Law Review 585–610.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Tom, “Cameron Vows to Defy Europe on Prisoner Voting,” The Telegraph, 24 May 2012, available at www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9285408/Cameron-vows-to-defy-Europe-on-prisoner-voting.html.Google Scholar

Wijffels, Alain, “Bringing Peripheries into Focus,” in d’Argent, Pierre (ed.), Droit des Frontières Internationals (Paris: Pedone, 2016), 43–55.Google Scholar

Willems, Vera (2017), “International Courts and Tribunals and Their Linguistic Practices: A Communities of Practice Approach,” (2017) 30 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 181–199.Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard, “Justice as a Virtue,” in Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980), 189–199.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1953).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, Matz, Conflicts in International Environmental Law (Berlin: Springer, 2003).Google Scholar

Worster, William Thomas, “Competition and Comity in the Fragmentation of International Law,” (2009) 34 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 119–150.Google Scholar

Xifaras, Mikhail, “The Global Turn in Legal Theory,” (2016) 29 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 215–243.Google Scholar

Yee, Sienho, “A Call for a More Rigorous Assessment of Universal Jurisdiction,” (2013) 107 ASIL Proceedings 242–5.Google Scholar

Zekoll, Joachim, “Jurisdiction in Cyberspace,” in Handl, Gunther, Zekoll, Joachim, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 341–369.Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Implementation of the WTO Agreements in China (London: Wildy, Simmons and Hill Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Andreas, “International Law and ‘Cyber Space’,” (2014) 3 ESIL Reflections.Google Scholar

Zincone, Giovanna and Basili, Marzia, “Country Report: Italy,” RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2010/35 (2010).Google Scholar

Zoppo, Laura, La Soluzione delle Controversie Commerciali tra Stati tra Multilaterismo e Regionalismo (Naples: Jovene, 2013).Google Scholar

Zuleeg, Manfred, “Demokratie und Wirtschaftsverfassung in der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs,” (1982) 16 Europarecht 21.Google Scholar

Zumbansen, Peer, “The Regulatory Landscape of Global Governance and Transnational Legal Authority,” in Handl, Gunther, Zekoll, Joachim, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 551–558.Google Scholar

Zurn, Michael, “Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems,” in Held, David and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (eds.), Global Governance and Public Accountability (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), 260–287.Google Scholar

Zurn, Michael, “Introduction: Law and Compliance at Different Levels,” in Zurn, Michael and Joerges, Christian (eds.), Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance Beyond the Nation-State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 1–39.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive