Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T13:47:41.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2019

Peter Furlong
Peter Furlong
Affiliation:
Valencia College, Florida
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Challenges of Divine Determinism
A Philosophical Analysis
 , pp. 223 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Marilyn McCord. 2017. “A Modest Proposal? Caveat Emptor! Moral Theory and Problems of Evil.” In Ethics and the Problem of Evil, edited by Sterba, James P., 9–26. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1991. “An Anti-Molinist Argument.” Philosophical Perspectives 5: 343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, David E. 2016. “Orthodoxy, Theological Determinism, and the Problem of Evil.” In Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by Johnson, Daniel M. and Alexander, David E., 123–43. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Alexander, David E., and Daniel, Johnson M. 2016. “Introduction.” In Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by Alexander, David E. and Johnson, Daniel M., 1–18. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Alm, David. 2015. “Responsibility, Manipulation, and Resentment.” Social Theory and Practice 41 (2): 253–74.Google Scholar
Almeida, Michael J. 2016. “Bringing about Perfect Worlds.” In Free Will and Theism: Connections, Contingencies, and Concerns, edited by Timpe, Kevin and Speak, Daniel, 195–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andow, James. 2015. “Thin, Fine and with Sensitivity: A Metamethodology of Intuitions.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1: 1–21.Google Scholar
Arberry, A. J. 1996. The Koran Interpreted: A Translation. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. 1980. A Theory of Universals: Volume 2: Universals and Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy. 2002. Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attar, Mariam. 2010. Islamic Ethics: Divine Command Theory in Arabo-Islamic Thought. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, H. 2009. Confessions, translated by Chadwick, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2003. “Why Christians Should Not Be Libertarians: An Augustinian Challenge.” Faith and Philosophy 20 (4): 460–78.Google Scholar
Barnes, Eric Christian. 2015. “Freedom, Creativity, and Manipulation.” Noûs 49 (3): 560–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basinger, David. 1984. “Divine Omniscience and Human Freedom.” Faith and Philosophy 1 (3): 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Macalester. 2013. “The Standing to Blame: A Critique.” In Blame: Its Nature and Norms, edited by Coates, D. Justin and Tognazzini, Neal A., 263–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berofsky, Bernard. 2006. “Global Control and Freedom.” Philosophical Studies 131 (2): 419–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, John. 1996. “Presentism and Properties.” Philosophical Perspectives 10 (Metaphysics): 35–52.Google Scholar
Björnsson, Gunnar, and Pereboom, Derk. 2016. “Traditional and Experimental Approaches to Free Will and Moral Responsibility.” In Companion to Experimental Philosophy, edited by Sytsma, Justin and Buckwalter, Wesley, 142–57. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bonino, Serge-Thomas. 2016. “Contemporary Thomism through the Prism of the Theology of Predestination.” In Thomism and Predestination: Principles and Disputations, edited by David, Barry, Long, Steven A., Nutt, Roger W., and White, Thomas Joseph, translated by Jetchick, Stefan, David, Barry, and Long, Steven A., 19–50. Ave Maria, FL: Sapientia Press of Ave Maria University.Google Scholar
Bourget, David, and Chalmers, David J.. 2014. “What Do Philosophers Believe?” Philosophical Studies 170 (3): 465–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, David B. 1994. “Divine Action and Human Freedom in the Context of Creation.” In The God Who Acts: Philosophical and Theological Explorations, 103–9. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Byerly, T. Ryan. 2017. “Free Will Theodicies for Theological Determinists.” Sophia 56 (2): 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, P. 2009. “Helm’s God and the Authorship of Sin.” In Reason, Faith and History: Philosophical Essays for Paul Helm, edited by Stone, M., 193–204. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. 1960. Calvin: Institutes of the Christian Religion, edited by McNeill, John T., translated by Battles, Ford Lewis. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Keith. 1990. Abstract Particulars. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2006. “Casting the First Stone: Who Can, and Who Can’t, Condemn the Terrorists?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 58: 113–36.Google Scholar
Collins, Brian. 2013. “Adding Substance to the Debate: Descartes on Freedom of the Will.” Essays in Philosophy 14 (2): 218–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couenhoven, Jesse. 2017. “The Indicative in the Imperative: On Augustinian Oughts and Cans.” In Free Will and Classical Theism: The Significance of Freedom in Perfect Being Theology, edited by McCann, Hugh J., 71–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, Steven B. 2011. “Compatibilism and the Sinlessness of the Redeemed in Heaven.” Faith and Philosophy 28 (4): 416–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, J. A. 2004. The Most Real Being: A Biblical and Philosophical Defense of Divine Determinism. Eugene, OR: Gutenberg College Press.Google Scholar
Cunning, David. 2013. “Descartes on God and the Products of His Will.” In Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities, edited by Diller, Jeanine and Kasher, Asa, 175–93. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Davies, Brian. 2006. The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Davies, Brian. 2011. Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 3: Correspondence, translated by Cottingham, John G., Stoothof, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, and Kenny, Anthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, T. 2014. The Problem of Animal Pain: A Theodicy for All Creatures Great and Small. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Trent, and McBrayer, Justin P.. 2014. Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. 2010. “Blame, Moral Standing and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Trial.” Ratio 23 (2): 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jonathan. 2009. The Works of Jonathan Edwards: Freedom of the Will. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Epictetus, . 2008. Discourses and Selected Writings, translated by Dobbin, Robert. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fara, Michael. 2008. “Masked Abilities and Compatibilism.” Mind 117 (468): 843–65.Google Scholar
Feinberg, John S. 2001. No One Like Him. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.Google Scholar
Finch, Alicia, and Warfield, Ted A.. 1998. “The Mind Argument and Libertarianism.” Mind 107 (427): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. 1994. The Metaphysics of Free Will: An Essay on Control. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. 2012. “Semicompatibilism and Its Rivals.” Journal of Ethics 16 (2): 117–43.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. 2016a. “How Do Manipulation Arguments Work?” Journal of Ethics 20 (1–3): 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. 2016b. “Libertarianism and the Problem of Flip-Flopping.” In Free Will and Theism: Connections, Contingencies, and Concerns, edited by Timpe, Kevin and Speak, Daniel, 48–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin, and Ravizza, Mark. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Mark. 1990. Personal Love. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Fisk, Milton. 1972. “Relatedness without Relations.” Noûs 6 (2): 139–51.Google Scholar
Flew, Antony. 1955. “Divine Omnipotence and Human Freedom.” In New Essays in Philosophical Theology, edited by Flew, Antony and MacIntyre, Alasdair., 144–69. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Flew, Antony. 1972. “Splitting Hairs before Starting Hares.” The Personalist 53: 84–93.Google Scholar
Flint, Thomas P. 1999. “A New Anti-Anti-Molinist Argument.” Religious Studies 35 (3): 299–305.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1969. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” Journal of Philosophy 66 (3): 829–39.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1986. “Three Concepts of Free Action: II.” In Moral Responsibility, edited by Fischer, John Martin, 113–23. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred. 1988. “‘Introduction’ to Luis de Molina.” In On Divine Foreknowledge, edited by Freddoso, Alfred J., 1–81. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, Kyle G., and Miller, Daniel. 2018. “Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (1): 118–39.Google Scholar
Furlong, Peter. 2014. “Is God the Cause of Sin?” Faith and Philosophy 31 (4): 422–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, Peter. 2017a. “Blameworthiness, Love, and Strong Divine Sovereignty.” Sophia 56 (3): 419–33.Google Scholar
Furlong, Peter. 2017b. “Libertarianism, the Rollback Argument, and the Objective Probability of Free Choices.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (4): 512–32.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. 1939. Predestination. London: Herder.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. 1947. God, His Existence and His Nature, translated by Rose, Dom Bede. Vol. 2. London: Herder.Google Scholar
Ginet, Carl. 1990. On Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, W. Matthews. 2009. “Aquinas on How God Causes the Act of Sin without Causing Sin Itself.” The Thomist 73 (3): 455–96.Google Scholar
Grant, W. Matthews. 2016a. “Divine Universal Causality and Libertarian Freedom.” In Free Will and Theism: Connections, Contingencies, and Concerns, edited by Timpe, Kevin and Speak, Daniel, 214–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, W. Matthews. 2016b. “The Privation Solution.” Faith and Philosophy 33 (2): 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Christopher, R. 2016. “A Compatibicalvinist Demonstrative-Goods Defense.” In Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by Alexander, David E. and Johnson, Daniel M., 233–47. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. 2014. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. Second, Revised and Enlarged Edition, Including an Inventory of Avicenna’s Authentic Works. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque. 1998. Moral Appraisability: Puzzles, Proposals, and Perplexities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque, and Cuypers, Stefaan E.. 2006. “Hard- and Soft-Line Responses to Pereboom’s Four-Case Manipulation Argument.” Acta Analytica 21 (4): 19–35.Google Scholar
Hart, Matthew J. 2016. “Calvinism and the Problem of Hell.” In Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by Alexander, David E. and Johnson, Daniel M., 248–72. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Hasker, William. 1989. God, Time and Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hasker, William. 1994. “God the Creator of Good and Evil?” In The God Who Acts, edited by Tracy, Thomas, 137–46. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hasker, William. 1995. “Middle Knowledge: A Refutation Revisited.” Faith and Philosophy 12 (2): 223–36.Google Scholar
Hasker, William. 1999. “A New Anti-Molinist Argument.” Religious Studies 35 (3): 291–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasker, William. 2011. “‘The (Non)-Existence of Molinist Counterfactuals.’” In Molinism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Perszyk, Ken, 25–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey. 1997. “Thomas Aquinas and the Voluntarists.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (2): 167–82.Google Scholar
Heil, John. 2012. The Universe as We Find It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, Paul. 1993. The Providence of God. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.Google Scholar
Helm, Paul. 2010. “God, Compatibilism, and the Authorship of Sin.” Religious Studies 46 (1): 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, Paul. 2016. “Discrimination: Aspects of God’s Causal Activity.” In Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by Alexander, David E. and Johnson, Daniel M., 145–67. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Hick, John. 1966. Evil and the God of Love. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. 2007. “Aquinas and Intellectual Determinism: The Test Case of Angelic Sin.” Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 89 (2): 122–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. 2013. “The Pleasure of Life and the Desire for Non-existence: Some Medieval Theories.” Res Philosophica 90 (3): 323–46.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, and Furlong, Peter. 2015. “Free Choice.” In Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide, edited by Dougherty, M. V., 56–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, and Michon, Cyrille. 2017. “Aquinas on Free Will and Intellectual Determinism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 17 (10): 1–36.Google Scholar
Holland, R. F. 1980. Against Empiricism: On Education, Epistemology and Value. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Howsepian, A. A. 2004. “A Libertarian-Friendly Theory of Compatibilist Free Action.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (4): 453–80.Google Scholar
Howsepian, A. A. 2007. “Compatibilism, Evil, and the Free-Will Defense.” Sophia 46 (3): 217–36.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael. 2000. “Van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument.” Philosophical Review 109 (4): 525–44.Google Scholar
Hunt, David P. 2004. “Providence, Foreknowledge, and Explanatory Loops: A Reply to Robinson.” Religious Studies 40 (4): 485–91.Google Scholar
John of Damascus. 1997. “Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.” In A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, translated by Salmond, S. D. F.. Vol. 9.2, 1–101. Edinburgh: T and T Clark.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel M. 2016. “Calvinism and the Problem of Evil: A Map of the Territory.” In Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by Alexander, David E. and Johnson, Daniel M., 19–55. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jeff. 2012. “The Topography of Divine Love.” Faith and Philosophy 29 (1): 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Jeff. 2015. “The Topography of Divine Love: A Reply to Thomas Talbott.” Faith and Philosophy 32 (2): 182–87.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jeff. 2017. “The ‘Loving Parent’ Analogy.’” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 82 (1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Kane, Robert H. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1965. The Metaphysical Elements of Justice: Part I of the Metaphysics of Morals, translated by Ladd, J.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Kapitan, Tomis. 1986. “Deliberation and the Presumption of Open Alternatives.” Philosophical Quarterly 36 (143): 230–51.Google Scholar
King, Matt. 2015. “Manipulation Arguments and the Standing to Blame.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Lange, Marc. 2016. Because without Cause: Non-Causal Explanations in Science and Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Neil. 2006. “Determinist Deliberations.” Dialectica 60 (4): 453–59.Google Scholar
Lewis, Peter J. 2016. Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liao, S. Matthew. 2008. “A Defense of Intuitions.” Philosophical Studies 140 (2): 247–62.Google Scholar
Liguori, Alfonsus. 1835. The True Spouse of Jesus Christ, translated by Clergyman, A Catholic. Dublin: John Coyne.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2013. “Who Can I Blame?” In Autonomy and the Self, edited by Kühler, Michael and Jelinek, Nadja, 295–315. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Long, Steven A., Nutt, Roger W., and White, Thomas Joseph. 2017. Thomism and Predestination: Principles and Disputations. Ave Maria, FL: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 2012. “A Neo-Aristotelian Substance Ontology: Neither Relational nor Constituent.” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by Tahko, Tuomas E., 229–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. 1998. “Aquinas’s Libertarian Account of Free Choice.” Revue International de Philosophie 52 (204): 309–28.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1955. “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64 (254): 200–12.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. 1966. God and the Permission of Evil, translated by Evans, Joseph W.. Milwaukee: Bruce Publishing.Google Scholar
Matava, Robert Joseph. 2016. Divine Causality and Human Free Choice: Domingo Báñez, Physical Premotion and the Controversy de Auxiliis Revisited. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh J. 1995. “Divine Sovereignty and the Freedom of the Will.” Faith and Philosophy 12 (4): 582–98.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh J. 2005. “The Author of Sin?” Faith and Philosophy 22 (2): 144–59.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh J. 2009. “God, Sin, and Rogers on Anselm.” Faith and Philosophy 26 (4): 420–31.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh J. 2012. Creation and the Sovereignty of God. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh J. 2017. Free Will and Classical Theism: The Significance of Freedom in Perfect Being Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Hugh J., and Johnson, Daniel M.. 2017. “Divine Providence.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/providence-divine/.Google Scholar
McKay, Thomas, and Johnson, David. 1996. “A Reconsideration of an Argument against Compatibilism.” Philosophical Topics 24 (2): 113–22.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. 2008. “A Hard-Line Reply to Pereboom’s Four-Case Manipulation Argument.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1): 142–159.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. 2012a. “Defending Nonhistorical Compatibilism: A Reply to Haji and Cuypers.” Philosophical Issues 22 (1): 264–80.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. 2012b. “Moral Responsibility, Manipulation Arguments, and History: Assessing the Resilience of Nonhistorical Compatibilism.” Journal of Ethics 16 (2): 145–74.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. 2013. “Responsibility and Globally Manipulated Agents.” In The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates, edited by Russell, Paul and Deery, Oisin, 342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. 2014. “Resisting the Manipulation Argument: A Hard-Liner Takes It on the Chin.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (2): 467–84.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. 2017. “Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3): 575–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y., and Lin, Martin. 2017. “Principle of Sufficient Reason.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/sufficient-reason/.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 1995. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 2006. Free Will and Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 2013. “Manipulation, Moral Responsibility, and Bullet Biting.” Journal of Ethics 17 (3): 167–84.Google Scholar
Mickelson, Kristin. 2010. “The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom’s Four-Case Argument.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4): 595–617.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark. 2012. “Reply to Morriston.” In Divine Evil?, edited by Bergmann, Michael, Murray, Michael, and Rea, Michael, 174–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolas, Jean-Hervé. 1960. “La Permission Du Péché.” Revue Thomiste 60(1): 5–37, 60(2): 185–206, 60(4): 509–46.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1989. “Love’s Bond.” In The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations, 68–86. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy. 1993. “On the Transfer of Necessity.” Noûs 27 (2): 204–18.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy. 2016. “Probability and Freedom: A Reply to Vicens.” Res Philosophica 93 (1): 289–93.Google Scholar
Oderberg, David S. 2016. “Divine Premotion.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (3): 207–22.Google Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. 1998. “Incompatibilism and the Avoidability of Blame.” Ethics 108 (4): 685–701.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. 2002. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa Theologiae 1a, 75–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pawl, Timothy, and Timpe, Kevin. 2009. “Incompatibilism, Sin, and Free Will in Heaven.” Faith and Philosophy 26 (4): 398–419.Google Scholar
Pawl, Timothy, and Timpe, Kevin. 2013. “Heavenly Freedom: A Response to Cowan.” Faith and Philosophy 30 (2): 188–97.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 1995. “Determinism Al Dente.” Noûs 29 (1): 21–45.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2001. Living without Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2005. “Free Will, Evil, and Divine Providence.” In God and the Ethics of Belief: New Essays in Philosophy of Religion, edited by Dole, Andrew and Chignell, Andrew, 77–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2006. “Reasons-Responsiveness, Alternative Possibilities, and Manipulation Arguments against Compatibilism: Reflections on John Martin Fischer’s My Way.” Philosophical Books 47 (3): 198–212.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2008a. “A Compatibilist Account of the Epistemic Conditions on Rational Deliberation.” Journal of Ethics 12 (3–4): 287–306.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2008b. “A Hard-Line Reply to the Multiple-Case Manipulation Argument.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1): 160–70.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2011. “Theological Determinism and Divine Providence.” In Molinism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Perszyk, Ken, 262–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2014. Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2016. “Libertarianism and Theological Determinism.” In Free Will and Theism: Connections, Contingencies, and Concerns, edited by Speak, Daniel and Timpe, Kevin, 112–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2017. “Theological Determinism and the Relationship with God.” In Free Will and Classical Theism: The Significance of Freedom in Perfect Being Theology, edited by McCann, Hugh J., 201–19. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perszyk, Ken. 2013. “Recent Work on Molinism.” Philosophy Compass 8 (8): 755–70.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 1974. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 1985. “Self-Profile.” In Alvin Plantinga, edited by Tomberlin, James E. and van Inwagen, Peter, 3–97. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1997. Complete Works, edited by Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . 2018. The Enneads, translated by Gerson, Lloyd P., Boys-Stones, George, Dillon, John M., King, R. A. H., Smith, Andrew, and Wilberding, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. 2006. The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. 2013. “Incompatibilism Proved.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (4): 430–37.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. 2016. “The First Sin: A Dilemma for Christian Determinists.” In Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by Alexander, David E. and Johnson, Daniel M., 187–99. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Ragland, C. P. 2005. “Descartes on Divine Providence and Human Freedom.” Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 87 (2): 159–88.Google Scholar
Ragland, C. P. 2016. The Will to Reason: Theodicy and Freedom in Descartes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Michael D. 2004a. “Divine Guidance and an Accidentally Necessary Future: A Response to Hunt.” Religious Studies 40 (4): 493–98.Google Scholar
Robinson, Michael D. 2004b. “Divine Providence, Simple Foreknowledge, and the ‘Metaphysical Principle.’” Religious Studies 40 (4): 471–83.Google Scholar
Rogers, Katherin A. 2003. “Does God Cause Sin?” Faith and Philosophy 20 (3): 371–78.Google Scholar
Rogers, Katherin A. 2007. “God Is Not the Author of Sin: An Anselmian Response to McCann.” Faith and Philosophy 24 (3): 300–10.Google Scholar
Rogers, Katherin A. 2011. “Anselm against McCann: On God and Sin.” Faith and Philosophy 28 (4): 397–415.Google Scholar
Rogers, Katherin A. 2012. “The Divine Controller Argument for Incompatibilism.” Faith and Philosophy 29 (3): 275–94.Google Scholar
Sabini, John, and Silver, Maury. 1982. Moralities of Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. 2008. Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger. 1986. Sexual Desire: A Moral Philosophy of the Erotic. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sennett, James F. 1991. “The Free Will Defense and Determinism.” Faith and Philosophy 8 (3): 340–53.Google Scholar
Sher, George. 2005. In Praise of Blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, George. 2009. Who Knew?: Responsibility without Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore. 2001. “Criteria of Personal Identity and the Limits of Conceptual Analysis.” Philosophical Perspectives 15: 189–209.Google Scholar
Simons, Peter. 2010. “Relations and Truthmaking.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1): 199–213.Google Scholar
Singer, Irving. 1994. The Pursuit of Love. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smilanksy, Saul. 2006. “What Choice Did I Have?” The Times Literary Supplement. www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/private/what-choice-did-i-have/.Google Scholar
Smith, Angela M. 2007. “On Being Responsible and Holding Responsible.” Journal of Ethics 11 (4): 465–84.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. 2003. “Rational Capacities, Or: How to Distinguish Recklessness, Weakness, and Compulsion.” In Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, edited by Stroud, Sarah and Tappolet, Christine, 17–38. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Soble, Alan. 1997. “Union, Autonomy, and Concern.” In Love Analyzed, edited by Lamb, Roger E., 65–92. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. 1995. The God of Faith and Reason: Foundations of Christian Theology. Washington, DC: CUA Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. 1988. About Love: Reinventing Romance for Our Times. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sripada, Chandra. 2016. “Self-Expression: A Deep Self Theory of Moral Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 173 (5): 1203–32.Google Scholar
Steward, Helen. 2012. “The Metaphysical Presuppositions of Moral Responsibility.” Journal of Ethics 16 (2): 241–71.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. 2003. Aquinas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. 2010. Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. 1978. “Natural Evil.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (4): 295–301.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. 2011. “Reply to Morriston.” In Divine Evil? The Moral Character of the God of Abraham, edited by Bergmann, Michael, Murray, Michael J., and Rea, Michael C., 232–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talbott, Thomas. 2013. “The Topography of Divine Love: A Response to Jeff Jordan.” Faith and Philosophy 30 (3): 302–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn. 1988. God and Creation in Christian Theology: Tyranny or Empowerment? Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn. 1994. “Human Freedom, Human Sin, and God the Creator.” In The God Who Acts, edited by Tracey, Tom, 111–35. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard. 1967. “Determinism.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edwards, Paul, 1–2:359–73. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1911. Summa Theologica, translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: R. and T. Washbourne.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1952. The Disputed Questions on Truth. Vol. 1. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1975. Summa Contra Gentiles: Book One: God, translated by Pegis, Anton. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 2001. The de Malo of Thomas Aquinas, translated by Regan, Richard. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timpe, Kevin. 2004. “Why Christians Might Be Libertarians.” Philosophia Christi 6 (2): 279–88.Google Scholar
Timpe, Kevin, and Speak, Daniel. 2016. Free Will and Theism: Connections, Contingencies, and Concerns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tobia, Kevin, Buckwalter, Wesley, and Stich, Stephen. 2013. “Moral Intuitions: Are Philosophers Experts?” Philosophical Psychology 26 (5): 629–38.Google Scholar
Todd, Patrick. 2012. “Manipulation and Moral Standing: An Argument for Incompatibilism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 12 (7), 1–18.Google Scholar
Todd, Patrick. In press. “A Unified Account of the Moral Standing to Blame.” Noûs.Google Scholar
Tognazzini, Neal A. 2014. “The Structure of a Manipulation Argument.” Ethics 124 (2): 358–69.Google Scholar
Tooley, Michael. 2015. “The Problem of Evil.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/evil/.Google Scholar
Torre, Michael D. 2009. God’s Permission of Sin: Negative or Conditioned Decree? A Defense of the Doctrine of Francisco Marin-Sola, O.P., Based on the Principles of Thomas Aquinas. Fribourg: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trabbic, Joseph G. 2016. “Praemotio Physica and Divine Transcendence.” In Thomism and Predestination: Principles and Disputations, 152–65. Ave Maria, FL: Sapientia Press of Ave Maria University.Google Scholar
Turner, Jason. 2013. “Compatibilism and the Free Will Defense.” Faith and Philosophy 30 (2): 125–37.Google Scholar
Turri, John. 2017. “Compatibilism Can Be Natural.” Consciousness and Cognition 51: 68–81.Google Scholar
Vaesen, Krist, Peterson, Martin, and Van Bezooijen, Bart. 2013. “The Reliability of Armchair Intuitions.” Metaphilosophy 44 (5): 559–78.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1988. “The Place of Chance in a World Sustained by God.” In God, Knowledge, and Mystery, 42–65. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1993. Metaphysics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 2000. “Free Will Remains a Mystery.” Philosophical Perspectives 14: 1–20.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 2006. The Problem of Evil: The Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of St. Andrews in 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 2008. “How to Think about the Problem of Free Will.” Journal of Ethics 12 (3/4): 327–41.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 2015. “Some Thoughts on An Essay on Free Will.” Harvard Review of Philosophy 22: 16–30.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 2017a. “Concluding Meditation.” In Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter van Inwagen, edited by Keller, John A., 343–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 2017b. “The Problem of Fr** W*ll.” In Free Will and Classical Theism: The Significance of Freedom in Perfect Being Theology, edited by McCann, Hugh J., 3–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 2017c. Thinking about Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vargas, Manuel. 2006. “On the Importance of History for Responsible Agency.” Philosophical Studies 127 (3): 351–82.Google Scholar
Vicens, Leigh. 2012. “Divine Determinism, Human Freedom, and the Consequence Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2): 145–55.Google Scholar
Vicens, Leigh. 2014. “Theological Determinism.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Vicens, Leigh. 2016. “Objective Probabilities of Free Choice.” Res Philosophica 93 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Vihvelin, Kadri. 2004. “Free Will Demystified: A Dispositional Account.” Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2): 427–50.Google Scholar
Vihvelin, Kadri. 2013. Causes, Laws, and Free Will: Why Determinism Doesn’t Matter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. 2010. “Hypocrisy, Moral Address, and the Equal Standing of Persons.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (4): 307–41.Google Scholar
Walls, Jerry. 2011. “Why No Classical Theist, Let Alone Orthodox Christian, Should Ever Be a Compatibilist.” Philosophia Christi 13 (1): 75–104.Google Scholar
Welty, Greg. 2016. “Molinist Gunslingers: God and the Authorship of Sin.” In Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by Alexander, David E. and Johnson, Daniel M., 56–77. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, Roger. 1998. “Constraining Condemning.” Ethics 108 (3): 489–501.Google Scholar
White, Heath. 2016. “Theological Determinism and the ‘Authoring Sin’ Objection.” In Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by Alexander, David E. and Johnson, Daniel M., 78–95. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Widerker, David. 1987. “On an Argument for Incompatibilism.” Analysis 47: 37–41.Google Scholar
Widerker, David. 1991. “A Problem for the Eternity Solution.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 29 (2): 87–95.Google Scholar
Widerker, David. 1994. “Providence, Eternity, and Human Freedom: A Reply to Stump and Kretzmann.” Faith and Philosophy 11 (2): 242–54.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. 1983. Predestination, God’s Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents, translated by Adams, Marilyn McCord and Kretzmann, Norman. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas. 2011. “Human Freedom and Agency.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, edited by Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore, 199–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. 1990. Freedom within Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yaffe, Gideon. 2003. “Indoctrination, Coercion and Freedom of Will.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2): 335–56.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Peter Furlong
  • Book: The Challenges of Divine Determinism
  • Online publication: 07 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108696845.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Peter Furlong
  • Book: The Challenges of Divine Determinism
  • Online publication: 07 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108696845.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Peter Furlong
  • Book: The Challenges of Divine Determinism
  • Online publication: 07 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108696845.011
Available formats
×