Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:49:47.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Cultural diversity of nut-cracking behaviour between two populations of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in the Côte d’Ivoire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2019

Christophe Boesch
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Roman Wittig
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Catherine Crockford
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Linda Vigilant
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Tobias Deschner
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Fabian Leendertz
Affiliation:
Robert Koch-Institut, Germany
Get access

Summary

Across Africa, chimpanzee communities exhibit large behavioural diversity not exclusively explained by ecological or genetic variation. However, excluding subtle environmental factors is difficult when comparing far-apart populations. Taï National Park offers a unique opportunity to explore the impact of social learning on behavioural diversity. The Taï South and Djouroutou communities live only 60 km apart in a continuous ecosystem. However, these groups apply semi-different techniques when nut-cracking. Djouroutou chimpanzees crack five species of nuts, exclusively using stone tools. Taï South only cracks four of those species, using stone and wooden tools, and does not exploit abundant Sacoglottis gabonensis nuts. Moreover, this group uses stone and wooden tools. Here, we compared tool material availability and tool choice. Our results showed that both groups did not differ in available nut trees and access to different materials. The communities responded to these ecological conditions differently than predicted if availability was the only factor responsible for shaping behaviour. This highlights the potential role of cultural behaviour in wild chimpanzee feeding ecology.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest
40 Years of Research
, pp. 194 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvard, M. S. (2003). The adaptive nature of culture. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12(3), 136149. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.10109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arroyo, A. & de la Torre, I. (2016). Assessing the function of pounding tools in the Early Stone Age: A microscopic approach to the analysis of percussive artefacts from Beds I and II, Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania). Journal of Archaeological Science, 74, 2334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.08.003Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, A. (2000). History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singman, H., et al. (2015). Package ‘lme4’, version 1.1-7. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package_lme4Google Scholar
Boesch, C. (1991). Handedness in wild chimpanzees. International Journal of Primatology, 12, 541558. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547669Google Scholar
Boesch, C. (2003). Is culture a golden barrier between human and chimpanzee? Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 8291. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.10106Google Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. (1983). Optimisation of nut-cracking with natural hammers by wild chimpanzees. Behaviour, 83, 265286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. (1990). Tool use and tool making in wild chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica, 54, 8699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boesch, C., Crockford, C., Herbinger, I., Wittig, R., Moebius, Y. & Normand, E. (2008). Intergroup conflicts among chimpanzees in Taï National Park: Lethal violence and the female perspective. American Journal of Primatology, 70, 519532. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boesch, C., Marchesi, P., Marchesi, N., Fruth, B. & Joulian, F. (1994). Is nut cracking in wild chimpanzees a cultural behaviour? Journal of Human Evolution, 26, 325338. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1994.1020Google Scholar
Collard, I. F. & Foley, R. A. (2002). Latitudinal patterns and environmental determinants of recent human cultural diversity: Do humans follow biogeographical rules? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4, 371383.Google Scholar
Davidson, I. & McGrew, W. C. (2005). Stone tools and the uniqueness of human culture. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11, 793817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9655.2005.00262.xGoogle Scholar
Derex, M., Beugin, M. P., Godelle, B. & Raymond, M. (2013). Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity. Nature, 503(7476), 389391. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12774Google Scholar
Durham, W. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Foley, R. A. & Lahr, M. M. (2011). The evolution of the diversity of cultures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366(1567), 10801089. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0370CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R Companion to Applied Regression. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Galef, B. G. (1992). The question of animal culture. Human Nature, 3, 157178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692251Google Scholar
Gruber, T. (2013). Historical hypotheses of chimpanzee tool use behaviour in relation to natural and human-induced changes in an East African rain forest. Revue de primatologie, 5. https://doi.org/10.4000/primatologie.1690Google Scholar
Jenkins, P. F. (1978). Cultural transmission of song patterns and dialect development in a free-living bird population. Animal Behaviour, 26, 5078. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003–3472(78)90007–6Google Scholar
Kline, M. A. & Boyd, R. (2010). Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277(1693), 25592564. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0452Google Scholar
Koops, K., Schöning, C., Isaji, M. & Hashimoto, C. (2015). Cultural differences in ant-dipping tool length between neighbouring chimpanzee communities at Kalinzu, Uganda. Scientific Reports,5, 12456. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12456Google Scholar
Kühl, H. S., Kalan, A. K., Arandjelovic, M., Aubert, F., D’Auvergne, L., Goedmakers, A., et al. (2016). Chimpanzee accumulative stone throwing. Scientific Reports, 6, 22219. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22219Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (2000). Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. & Janik, V. M. (2006). The animal cultures debate. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 542547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.005Google Scholar
Luncz, L. V. & Boesch, C. (2014). Tradition over trend: Neighboring chimpanzee communities maintain differences in cultural behavior despite frequent immigration of adult females. American Journal of Primatology, 76, 649657. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22259CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luncz, L. V. & Boesch, C. (2015). The extent of cultural variation between adjacent chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) communities: A microecological approach. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 156, 6775. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22628Google Scholar
Luncz, L. V., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. (2012). Evidence for cultural differences between neighboring chimpanzee communities. Current Biology, 22, 922926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.031Google Scholar
Lycett, S. J., Collard, M. & McGrew, W. C. (2010). Are behavioral differences among wild chimpanzee communities genetic or cultural? An assessment using tool-use data and phylogenetic methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 142, 461467. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
McGrew, W. C. (1987). Tools to get food: The subsistants of Tasmanian Aborigines and Tanzanian chimpanzees compared. Journal of Anthropological Research, 43, 247258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherron, S. P., Alemseged, Z., Marean, C. W., Wynn, J. G., Reed, D., Geraads, D., et al. (2010). Evidence for stone-tool-assisted consumption of animal tissues before 3.39 million years ago at Dikika, Ethiopia. Nature, 466(7308), 857860. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09248Google Scholar
Medin, D. L. & Atran, S. (1999). Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishida, T. (1997). Sexual behavior of adult male chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates, 38, 379398. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381879Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture and causal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(4), 132135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–8721.00077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nsubuga, A. M., Robbins, M. M., Roeder, A. D., Morin, P. A., Boesch, C. & Vigilant, L. (2004). Factors affecting the amount of genomic DNA extracted from ape faeces and the identification of an improved sample storage method. Molecular Ecology, 13, 20892094. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02207.xGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, J. & Bates, D. (2006). Linear mixed-effects models: Basic concepts and examples. In Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS (pp. 356). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0–387-22747–4_1Google Scholar
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S. & Sarkar, D. (2013). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3, 1105.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rendell, L. & Whitehead, H. (2001). Culture in whales and dolphins. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 309324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0100396XGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M. (2013). Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sanz, C. M. & Morgan, D. B. (2007). Chimpanzee tool technology in the Goualougo Triangle, Republic of Congo. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 420433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.11.001Google Scholar
Sirianni, G., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. (2015). When to choose which tool: Multidimensional and conditional selection of nut-cracking hammers in wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 100, 152165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.11.022Google Scholar
Soiret, S. P., Kadjo, B., Assi, B. D. & Kouassi, P. K. (2015). New observations in nut cracking behavior of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in Djouroutou, Taï National Park. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 11, 1525.Google Scholar
van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., Galdikas, B., Knott, C. D., Singleton, I., et al. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299(5603), 102105. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078004Google Scholar
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Random and mixed effects. In Modern Applied Statistics with S (pp. 271300). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., et al. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzee. Nature, 399, 682685. https://doi.org/10.1038/21415Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×