Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Circular BioeconomyTheories and Tools for Economists and Sustainability Scientists, pp. 57 - 122Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
Abildtrup, J., Jensen, F., & Dubgaard, A. (2012). Does the Coase Theorem Hold in Real Markets? An Application to the Negotiations Between Waterworks and Farmers in Denmark. Journal of Environmental Management, 93(1), 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. B. (1987). The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development. Environmental Conservation, 14(2), 101–110.Google Scholar
Barbier, M., & Benoit, M. (1996). Programme AGREV. Synthèse des investigations menées de 1992 à 1995, sous la responsabilite scientifique de l’Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar
Bingham, L. R. (2021). Vittel as a Model Case in PES Discourse: Review and Critical Perspective. Ecosystem Services, 48, 101247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börner, J., Baylis, K., Corbera, E., … Wunder, S. (2017). The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. World Development, 96, 359–374.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1966). The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In Jarrett, H., ed., Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, Resources for the Future, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Brei, V. A. (2018). How is a Bottled Water Market Created? WIREs Water, 5(1). doi:10.1002/wat2.1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capodaglio, A., & Callegari, A. (2018). Can Payment for Ecosystem Services Schemes Be an Alternative Solution to Achieve Sustainable Environmental Development? A Critical Comparison of Implementation between Europe and China. Resources, 7(3), 40.Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.Google Scholar
Common, M. (1995). Sustainability and Policy: Limits to Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., & Cleveland, C. (2008). Natural Capital. The Encyclopedia of Earth, 31. Retrieved from http://editors.eol.org/eoearth/wiki/Natural_capitalGoogle Scholar
Depres, C., Grolleau, G., & Mzoughi, N. (2008). Contracting for Environmental Property Rights: The Case of Vittel. Economica, 75(299), 412–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everard, M. (2011). Common Ground: The Sharing of Land and Landscapes for Sustainability, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Folke, C., & Kåberger, T. (1991). Recent Trends in Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy. In Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy: Essays from the Eco-Eco Group, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 273–300.Google Scholar
Grolleau, G. (2013). Chapter 9: Collective Action Case Study – France. In Providing Agri-environmental Public Goods through Collective Action, Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 183–193.Google Scholar
GSI. (2009). Achieving the G-20 Call to Phase out Subsidies to Fossil Fuels: Policy Brief, Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, S., & Benoît, M. (2011). Gestion durable de la ressource en eau : l’utilisation du paiement pour service environnemental au service de la protection des captages. Annales Des Mines – Responsabilité et Environnement, N° 63(3), 87–95.Google Scholar
Ishiguro, S. (2003). Comparing Allocations Under Asymmetric Information: Coase Theorem revisited. Economics Letters, 80(1), 67–71.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. J., & Polasky, S. (2018). An Auction Mechanism for the Optimal Provision of Ecosystem Services Under Climate Change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92, 20–34.Google Scholar
Lichfield, J. (2004, September 16). Eau dear, what can the matter be? Retrieved from 16/09/2022 www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/eau-dear-what-can-the-matter-be-32590.htmlGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London (8th Ed. Published in 1920): Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meramveliotakis, G., & Milonakis, D. (2018). Coasean Theory of Property Rights and Law Revisited: A Critical Inquiry. Science & Society, 82(1), 38–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareto, V. (1897). The New Theories of Economics. Journal of Political Economy, 5(4), 485–502.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Perrot-Maître, D. (2006). The Vittel Payments for Ecosystem Services: A Perfect PES Case? London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Perrot-Maître, D. (2014). The Vittel Case: A Public-Private Partnership in the Mineral Water Industry. Case studies on Remuneration of Positive Externalities (RPE)/ Payments for Environmental Services (PES), Rome. Retrieved from www.fao.org/3/a-bl927e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Santos, R., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Antunes, P., Ring, I., & Clemente, P. (2015). Reviewing the Role of Habitat Banking and Tradable Development Rights in the Conservation Policy Mix. Environmental Conservation, 42(4), 294–305.Google Scholar
Turner, R. K., Subak, S., & Adger, W. N. (1996). Pressures, Trends, and Impacts in Coastal Zones: Interactions between Socioeconomic and Natural Systems. Environmental Management, 20(2), 159–173.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Addressing Single-Use Plastic Products Pollution using a Life Cycle Approach. Retrieved from www.unep.org/resources/publication/addressing-single-use-plastic-products-pollution-using-life-cycle-approachGoogle Scholar
Wunder, S., Börner, J., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Feder, S., & Pagiola, S. (2020). Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 209–234.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. (2016). Payments for Forest-based Environmental Services: A Close Look. Forest Policy and Economics, 72, 78–84.Google Scholar
References
Antikainen, M., & Valkokari, K. (2016). A framework for sustainable circular business model innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosman, R., & Rotmans, J. (2016). Transition governance towards a bioeconomy: A comparison of Finland and the Netherlands. Sustainability, 8(10), 1017.Google Scholar
Caniëls, M. C. J., & Romijn, H. A. (2008). Strategic niche management: Towards a policy tool for sustainable development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(2), 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, D., Veijonaho, S., & Toppinen, A. (2020). Towards sustainability? Forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in Finnish SMEs. Forest Policy and Economics, 110, 101848.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2018). A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. European Commission.–2018.–URL: https://Ec.Europa.Eu/Research/Bioeconomy/Pdf/Ec_bioeconomy_Strategy_2018.Pdf (Дата Обращения 25.02. 2020).Google Scholar
Foxon, T. J., Hammond, G. P., & Pearson, P. J. G. (2010). Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1203–1213.Google Scholar
Fritsche, U., & Rösch, C. (2020). The Conditions of a Sustainable Bioeconomy. In Bioeconomy for Beginners, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 177–202.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., … Wassermann, S. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy, 45(4), 896–913.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W., & Smit, W. A. (2000). Failed technology futures: Pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures, 32(9–10), 867–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetemäki, L., Hanewinkel, M., Muys, B., … Potoćnik, J. (2017). Leading the Way to a European Circular Bioeconomy Strategy, Vol. 5, European Forest Institute Joensuu, Finland.Google Scholar
Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(1), 78–91.Google Scholar
Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198.Google Scholar
Kershaw, E. H., Hartley, S., McLeod, C., & Polson, P. (2021). The sustainable path to a circular bioeconomy. Trends in Biotechnology, 39(6), 542–545.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2006). Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development. In Understanding Industrial Transformation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187–206.Google Scholar
Lopolito, A., Morone, P., & Sisto, R. (2011). Innovation niches and socio-technical transition: A case study of bio-refinery production. Futures, 43(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615.Google Scholar
Morone, P., Lopolito, A., Anguilano, D., Sica, E., & Tartiu, V. E. (2016). Unpacking landscape pressures on socio-technical regimes: Insights on the urban waste management system. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 20, 62–74.Google Scholar
Morone, P., Tartiu, V. E., & Falcone, P. (2015). Assessing the potential of biowaste for bioplastics production through social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 43–54.Google Scholar
OECD. (2018). Meeting Policy Challenges for a Sustainable Bioeconomy, OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264292345-enGoogle Scholar
Owen, R., Brennan, G., & Lyon, F. (2018). Enabling investment for the transition to a low carbon economy: government policy to finance early stage green innovation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 137–145.Google Scholar
Pagotto, M., & Halog, A. (2016). Towards a circular economy in Australian agri-food industry: An application of input-output oriented approaches for analyzing resource efficiency and competitiveness potential. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(5), 1176–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Asselt, M. (2001). Transition management: A promising policy perspective. In Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 165–197.Google Scholar
Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554.Google Scholar
Sillanpää, M., & Ncibi, C. (2017). A Sustainable Bioeconomy, Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55637-6Google Scholar
Stegmann, P., Londo, M., & Junginger, M. (2020). The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, 6, 100029.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Penguin.Google Scholar
Turnheim, B., & Geels, F. W. (2012). Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy, 50, 35–49.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2016). The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of market mechanism and policies. Energy Procedia, 104, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Aguilar, A., Wohlgemuth, R., & Twardowski, T. (2018). Perspectives on Bioeconomy. New Biotechnology, 40, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asada, R., Cardellini, G., Mair-Bauernfeind, C., … Stern, T. (2020). Effective Bioeconomy? a MRIO-based Socioeconomic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Generic Sectoral Innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119946.Google Scholar
Bai, X., van der Leeuw, S., O’Brien, K., … Syvitski, J. (2016). Plausible and Desirable Futures in the Anthropocene: A New Research Agenda. Global Environmental Change, 39, 351–362.Google Scholar
Barbier, E., & Burgess, J. (2017). Natural Resource Economics, Planetary Boundaries and Strong Sustainability. Sustainability, 9(10), 1858.Google Scholar
Bennich, T., & Belyazid, S. (2017). The Route to Sustainability – Prospects and Challenges of the Bio-Based Economy. Sustainability, 9(6), 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann. (2019). Interspecies Sustainability to Ensure Animal Protection: Lessons from the Thoroughbred Racing Industry. Sustainability, 11(19), 5539.Google Scholar
Braat, L. C., & de Groot, R. (2012). The Ecosystem Services Agenda: Bridging the Worlds of Natural Science and Economics, Conservation and Development, and Public and Private Policy. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 4–15.Google Scholar
Cohen, F., Hepburn, C. J., & Teytelboym, A. (2019). Is Natural Capital Really Substitutable? Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44(1), 425–448.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1987). Toward an Ecological Economics. Ecological Modelling, 38(1–2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crownshaw, T., Morgan, C., Adams, A., … Horen Greenford, D. (2019). Over the Horison: Exploring the Conditions of a Post-Growth World. The Anthropocene Review, 6(1–2), 117–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, D. (2021). Sustainability Narratives as Transformative Solution Pathways: Zooming in on the Circular Economy. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(1), 231–242.Google Scholar
Dube, B. (2021). Why Cross and Mix Disciplines and Methodologies?: Multiple Meanings of Interdisciplinarity and Pluralism in Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics, 179, 106827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Chichakli, B., von Braun, J., Lang, C., Barben, D., & Philp, J. (2016). Policy: Five Cornerstones of a Global Bioeconomy. Nature, 535(7611), 221–223.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2018). A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment: Updated Bioeconomy Strategy SWD/2018/431. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/edace3e3-e189-11e8-b690-01aa75ed71a1/Google Scholar
Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological Resilience and Biosphere-based Sustainability Science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341Google Scholar
Gardner, T. (2004). Limits to Growth? – A Perspective on the Perpetual Debate. Environmental Sciences, 1(2), 121–138.Google Scholar
Geels, F.W. (2019). Socio-technical Transitions to Sustainability: A Review of Criticisms and Elaborations of the Multi-level Perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009Google Scholar
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A Review on Circular Economy: The Expected Transition to a Balanced Interplay of Environmental and Economic Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.Google Scholar
Giampietro, M. (2019). On the Circular Bioeconomy and Decoupling: Implications for Sustainable Growth. Ecological Economics, 162, 143–156.Google Scholar
Giampietro, M., & Funtowics, S. O. (2020). From Elite Folk Science to the Policy Legend of the Circular Economy. Environmental Science & Policy, 109, 64–72.Google Scholar
Goodland, R., & Daly, H. (1996). Environmental Sustainability: Universal and Non-Negotiable. Ecological Applications, 6(4), 1002–1017.Google Scholar
Haffar, M., & Searcy, C. (2018). Target-Setting for Ecological Resilience: Are Companies Setting Environmental Sustainability Targets in Line with Planetary Thresholds? Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1079–1092.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. (2008). Intellectual Property Rights, the Bioeconomy and the Challenge of Biopiracy. Genomics, Society and Policy, 4(3), 26.Google Scholar
Harmon, M. E. (2019). Have Product Substitution Carbon Benefits Been Overestimated? A Sensitivity Analysis of Key Assumptions. Environmental Research Letters. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab1e95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikkurinen, P., & Bonnedahl, K. J. (2018). Dead ends and liveable futures: A framework for sustainable change. In Bonnedahl, K. J. & Heikkurinen, P., eds., Strongly Sustainable Societies: Organising Human Activities on a Hot and Full Earth , Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge, 2019. | Series: Routledge studies in sustainability: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351173643Google Scholar
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet, Routledge.Google Scholar
Jander, W., & Grundmann, P. (2019). Monitoring the Transition Towards a Bioeconomy: A General Framework and a Specific Indicator. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236 (117564). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.039Google Scholar
Johnson, F. X. (2017). Biofuels, Bioenergy and the Bioeconomy in North and South. Industrial Biotechnology, 13(6), 289–291.Google Scholar
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The Concept and Its Limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46.Google Scholar
Leach, M., Newell, P., & Scoones, I. (2015). The Politics of Green Transformations, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315747378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, M., Raworth, K., & Rockström, J. (2013). Between Social and Planetary Boundaries: Navigating Pathways in the Safe and Just Space for Humanity. In World Social Science Report 2013, Paris, France: OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing, pp. 84–89.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, I., Gaudet, N., Lask, J., Maier, J., Tchouga, B., & Vargas-Carpintero, R. (2018). Context. In Bioeconomy: Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy. Springer Open University of Hohenheim. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_2Google Scholar
Managi, S., & Kumar, P. (2018). Inclusive Wealth Report 2018, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351002080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastini, R., Kallis, G., & Hickel, J. (2021). A Green New Deal without Growth? Ecological Economics, 179, 106832.Google Scholar
Munda, G. (1997). Environmental Economics, Ecological Economics, and the Concept of Sustainable Development. Environmental Values, 6(2), 213–233.Google Scholar
Neill, A. M., O’Donoghue, C., & Stout, J. C. (2020). A Natural Capital Lens for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Determining the Unrealised and Unrecognised Services from Nature. Sustainability, 12(19), 8033.Google Scholar
O’Neill, J. (2020). What Is Lost through No Net Loss. Economics & Philosophy, 36(2), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, S., Hildebrandt, J., Will, M., Henn, L., & Beer, K. (2021). Tying Up Loose Ends. Integrating Consumers’ Psychology into a Broad Interdisciplinary Perspective on a Circular Sustainable Bioeconomy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 34(2), 8.Google Scholar
Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Evidence and Arguments against Green Growth as a Sole Strategy for Sustainability. European Environmental Bureau. https://eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Decoupling-Debunked.pdfGoogle Scholar
Patterson, J., Schuls, K., Vervoort, J., … Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the Governance and Politics of Transformations Towards Sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–16.Google Scholar
Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Pülsl, H. (2018). Sustainable Development – A ‘Selling Point’ of the Emerging EU Bioeconomy Policy Framework? Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4170–4180.Google Scholar
Raworth, K. (2012). A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can We Live Within the Doughnut?, Oxfam. www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/dp-a-safe-and-just-space-for-humanity-130212-en_5.pdfGoogle Scholar
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a Twenty-First Century Economist. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., … Foley, J. A. (2009). A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.Google Scholar
Røpke, I. (2004). The Early History of Modern Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics. 50(3–4), 293–314. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.012Google Scholar
Røpke, I. (2005). Trends in the Development of Ecological Economics from the Late 1980s to the Early 2000s. Ecological Economics, 55(2), 262–290.Google Scholar
Scheidel, A., Temper, L., Demaria, F., & Martínes-Alier, J. (2018). Ecological Distribution Conflicts as Forces for Sustainability: An Overview and Conceptual Framework. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 585–598.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. W., Gillespie, I., Hirsch, M., & Begley, C. (2011). Biosecurity and Sustainability within the Growing Global Bioeconomy. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(1–2), 4–10.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015a). The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., … Sörlin, S. (2015b). Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science, 347(6223). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirling, A. (2015). Emancipating Transformations: From Controlling ‘The Transition’ to Culturing Plural Radical Progress. In The Politics of Green Transformations, Abingon, Oxon, New York: Routledge, pp. 54–67.Google Scholar
Vadén, T., Lähde, V., Majava, A., … Eronen, J. T. (2020). Decoupling for Ecological Sustainability: A Categorisation and Review of Research Literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 236–244.Google Scholar
Vivien, F.-D., Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R., & Giampietro, M. (2019). The Hijacking of the Bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189–197.Google Scholar
Ward, J. D., Sutton, P. C., Werner, A. D., Costansa, R., Mohr, S. H., & Simmons, C. T. (2016). Is Decoupling GDP Growth from Environmental Impact Possible? PLOS ONE, 11(10), e0164733.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, T., Lensen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ Warning on Affluence. Nature Communications, 11(1), 3107.Google Scholar
Zeug, W., Besama, A., & Thrän, D. (2020). Towards a Holistic and Integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the Bioeconomy: Background on Concepts, Visions and Measurements, UFZ Discussion Paper.Google Scholar