Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:37:02.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Monitoring of the microcirculation

from Section 2 - Basic science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

By
Atilla Kara ,
Şakir Akin  and
Can Ince
Edited by
Robert G. Hahn
Robert G. Hahn
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting , pp. 82 - 91
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bundgaard-Nielsen, M, Secher, NH, Kehlet, H. ‘Liberal’ vs. ‘restrictive’ perioperative fluid therapy – a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 843–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chappell, D, Jacob, M, Hofmann-Kiefer, K, Conzen, P, Rehm, M. A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 723–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilot, M, Ehrenfeld, JM, Lee, C, et al. Variability in practice and factors predictive of total crystalloid administration during abdominal surgery: a retrospective two-center analysis. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 767–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ince, C. The rationale for microcirculatory-guided fluid therapy. Curr Opin Crit Care 2014; 20: 301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yealy, DM, Kellum, JA, Huang, DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1683–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Pearse, RM, Harrison, DA, MacDonald, N, et al. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA 2014; 311: 2181–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pottecher, J, Deruddre, S, Teboul, JL, et al. Both passive leg raising and intravascular volume expansion improve sublingual microcirculatory perfusion in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1867–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ospina-Tascon, G, Neves, AP, Occhipinti, G, et al. Effects of fluids on microvascular perfusion in patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 949–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pranskunas, A, Koopmans, M, Koetsier, PM, et al. Microcirculatory blood flow as a tool to select ICU patients eligible for fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 612–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, E, De Backer, D, Creteur, J, Vincent, JL. Effects of fluid challenge on gastric mucosal pCO2 in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 423–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Backer, D, Ortiz, JA, Salgado, D. Coupling microcirculation to systemic hemodynamics. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010; 16: 250–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellinga, NAR, Ince, C, Boerma, EC. Elevated central venous pressure is associated with impairment of microcirculatory blood flow in sepsis: a hypothesis generating post hoc analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2013; 13: 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dellinger, RP, Levy, MM, Rhodes, A, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 165–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ince, C, Sinaasappel, M. Microcirculatory oxygenation and shunting in sepsis and shock. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1369–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruartmoner, G, Mesquida, J, Ince, C. How can we monitor microcirculation in sepsis? Does it improve outcome? In: Deutschman, CS, Neligan, PJ, eds. Evidence-Based Practice of Critical Care. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2010: 291–6.Google Scholar
De Backer, D, Ospina-Tascon, G, Salgado, D, et al. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1813–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, RC, Parrillo, JE, Dellinger, RP, et al. Point-of-care assessment of microvascular blood flow in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1761–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goedhart, PT, Khalilzada, M, Bezemer, R, et al. Sidestream dark field (SDF) imaging: a novel stroboscopic LED ring-based imaging modality for clinical assessment of the microcirculation. Optics Express 2007; 15: 15101–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groner, W, Winkelman, JW, Harris, AG, et al. Orthogonal polarization spectral imaging: a new method for study of the microcirculation. Nat Med 1999; 5: 1209–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Backer, D, Hollenberg, S, Boerma, C, et al. How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference. Crit Care 2007; 11: R101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boerma, EC, Mathura, KR, van der Voort, PHJ, et al. Quantifying bedside-derived imaging of microcirculatory abnormalities in septic patients: a prospective validation study. Crit Care 2005; 9: R601–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, H, Klausner, S, Cook, WA. Incident dark-field illumination: a new method for microcirculatory study. Angiology 1971; 22: 295–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aykut, G, Veenstra, G, Scorcella, C, Ince, C, Boerma, C. Cytocam-IDF (incident dark field illumination) imaging for bedside monitoring of the micro-circulation. Intensive Care Med Exp 2015; 3: 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhanji, S, Lee, C, Watson, D, et al. Microvascular flow and tissue oxygenation after major abdominal surgery: association with postoperative complications. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 671–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Backer, D, Dubois, MJ, Schmartz, D, et al. Microcirculatory alterations in cardiac surgery: effects of cardiopulmonary bypass and anesthesia. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 1396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karliczek, A, Benaron, DA, Baas, PC, et al. Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy for prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomoses. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 1018–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guidet, B, Soni, N, Della Rocca, G, et al. A balanced view of balanced solutions. Crit Care 2010; 14: 325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCluskey, SA, Karkouti, K, Wijeysundera, D, et al. Hyperchloremia after noncardiac surgery is independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality: a propensity-matched cohort study. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 412–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ince, C, Groenveld, AB. The case for 0.9% NaCl: is the undefendable, defensible? Kidney Int 2014; 86: 1087–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handy, JM, Soni, N. Physiological effects of hyperchloraemia and acidosis. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 141–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, CS. Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. J Clin Invest 1983; 71: 726–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullivant, EM, Wilcox, CS, Welch, WJ. Intrarenal vasoconstriction during hyperchloremia: role of thromboxane. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: F152–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Kiraly, LN, Differding, JA, Enomoto, TM, et al. Resuscitation with normal saline (NS) vs. lactated Ringers (LR) modulates hypercoagulability and leads to increased blood loss in an uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock swine model. J Trauma 2006; 61: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, CR, Vinecore, K, Hagg, DS, et al. Resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with normal saline vs. lactated Ringer's: effects on oxygenation, extravascular lung water and haemodynamics. Crit Care 2009; 13: R30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, SR, Malinoski, D, Muller, PJ, et al. Lactated Ringer's is superior to normal saline in the resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma 2007; 62: 636–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Konrad, FM, Mik, EG, Bodmer, SIA, et al. Acute normovolemic hemodilution in the pig is associated with renal tissue edema, impaired renal microvascular oxygenation and functional loss. Anesthesiology 2013; 119: 256–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aksu, U, Bezemer, R, Yavuz, B, et al. Balanced vs. unbalanced crystalloid resuscitation in a near-fatal model of hemorrhagic shock and the effects on renal oxygenation, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Resuscitation 2012; 83: 767–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarlane, C, Lee, A. A comparison of Plasmalyte 148 and 0.9% saline for intra-operative fluid replacement. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 779–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, JH, Gottlieb, A, Schoenwald, P, et al. Normal saline versus lactated Ringer's solution for intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: an outcome study. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 817–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Malley, CM, Frumento, RJ, Hardy, MA, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of lactated Ringer's solution and 0.9% NaCl during renal transplantation. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1518–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Shaw, AD, Bagshaw, SM, Goldstein, SL, et al. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 821–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yunos, NM, Bellomo, R, Hegarty, C, et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs. chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA 2012; 308: 1566–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yunos, NM, Kim, IB, Bellomo, R, et al. The biochemical effects of restricting chloride-rich fluids in intensive care. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 2419–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhee, P, Wang, D, Ruff, P, et al. Human neutrophil activation and increased adhesion by various resuscitation fluids. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 74–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, R, Kirschenbaum, LA, Larow, C, Astiz, ME. The effect of resuscitation fluids on neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions in septic shock. Shock 2011; 36: 440–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, BU, Hwang, JQ, Gardner, TH, et al. Lactated Ringer's solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 710–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24: S1–106.Google Scholar
Bederson, JB, Connolly, ES, Batjer, HH, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 2009; 40: 994–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, DJ, Myburgh, J, Heritie, S, et al. Albumin resuscitation for traumatic brain injury: is intracranial hypertension the cause of increased mortality? J Neurotrauma 2013; 30: 512–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tommassino, C, Moore, S, Todd, MM. Cerebral effects of isovolemic hemodilution with crystaloid or colloid solutions. Crit Care Med 1988; 16: 862–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roquilly, A, Loutrel, O, Cinotti, R, et al. Balanced versus chloride-rich solutions for fluid resuscitation in brain-injured patients: a randomized double-blind pilot study. Crit Care 2013; 17: R77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, TJ. The ideal crystalloid – what is ‘balanced’? Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19: 299–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, M, Buggy, DJ. Intraoperative fluids: how much is too much? Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holte, K, Sharrock, NE, Kehlet, H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 622–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, RM, Park, PK, Hunt, JP, et al. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network. Less is more: improved outcomes in surgical patients with conservative fluid administration and central venous pressure monitoring. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 725–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, EJ, Clond, MA, Srour, MK, et al. Emergency department crystalloid resuscitation of 1.5 L or more is associated with increased mortality in elderly and nonelderly trauma patients. J Trauma 2011; 70: 398–400.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Bommel, J, Siegenund, M, Henny, CP, Trouwborst, A, Ince, C. Critical hematocrit in intestinal tissue oxygenation during severe normovolemic hemodilution. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 152–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeer, H, Teerenstra, S, de Sevaux, RGL. The effect of hemodilution during normothermic cardiac surgery on renal physiology and function: a review. Perfusion 2008; 23: 329–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arikan, AA, Zappitelli, M, Goldstein, SL, et al. Fluid overload is associated with impaired oxygenation and morbidity in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012; 13: 253–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perel, P, Roberts, I. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD000567.Google Scholar
Jones, SB, Whitten, CW, Monk, TG. Influence of crystalloid and colloid replacement solutions on hemodynamic variables during acute normovolemic hemodilution. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16: 11–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lobo, DN, Stanga, Z, Aloysius, MM, et al. Effect of volume loading with 1 liter intravenous infusions of 0.9% saline, 4% succinylated gelatin (Gelofusine) and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) on blood volume and endocrine responses: a randomized, three-way crossover study in healthy volunteers. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 464–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, MFM, Michell, WL, Joubert, IA, et al. Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch improves renal function and lactate clearance in penetrating trauma in a randomized controlled study: the FIRST trial (fluids in resuscitation of severe trauma). Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annane, D, Siami, S, Jaber, S, et al. CRISTAL Investigators. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs. crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 1809–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myburgh, JA, Finfer, S, Bellomo, R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1901–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edul, VS, Enrico, C, Laviolle, B, et al. Quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 1443–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Atasever, B, van der Kuil, M, Boer, C, et al. Red blood cell transfusion compared with gelatin solution and no infusion after cardiac surgery: effect on microvascular perfusion, vascular density, hemoglobin, and oxygen saturation. Transfusion 2012; 52: 2452–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisanevich, V, Felsenstein, I, Almogy, G, et al. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Aguilar-Nasciamento, JE, Diniz, BN, Do Carmo, AV, Silveira, EAO, Silva, RM. Clinical benefits after the implementation of a protocol of restricted perioperative intravenous crystalloid fluids in major abdominal operations. World J Surg 2009; 33: 925–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melis, M, Marcon, F, Masi, A, et al. Effect of intra-operative fluid volume on perioperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2012; 105: 81–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abraham-Nordling, M, Hjern, F, Pollack, J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of fluid resuscitation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, MC. Wet, dry or something else? Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 755–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, Z, Kellum, J. Perioperative fluids: a clear road ahead? Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19: 353–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×