Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T10:01:21.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Numerical Simulations and Coarse-Graining

from Part I - Paradigms and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

By
Fernando F. Grinstein
Edited by
Fernando F. Grinstein ,
Filipe S. Pereira  and
Massimo Germano
Fernando F. Grinstein
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Filipe S. Pereira
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Massimo Germano
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Accurate predictions with quantifiable uncertainty are essential to many practical turbulent flows in engineering, geophysics, and astrophysics typically comprising extreme geometrical complexity and broad ranges of length and timescales. Dominating effects of the flow instabilities can be captured with coarse-graining (CG) modeling based on the primary conservation equations and effectively codesigned physics and algorithms. The collaborative computational and laboratory experiments unavoidably involve inherently intrusive coarse-grained observations – intimately linked to their subgrid scale and supergrid (initial and boundary conditions) specifics. We discuss turbulence fundamentals and predictability aspects and introduce the CG modified equation analysis. Modeling and predictability issues for underresolved flow and mixing driven by underresolved velocity fields and underresolved initial and boundary conditions are revisited in this context. CG simulations modeling prototypical shock-tube experiments are used to exemplify relevant actual issues, challenges, and strategies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Coarse Graining Turbulence
Modeling and Data-Driven Approaches and their Applications
 , pp. 5 - 47
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. D. 1998. A History of Aerodynamics. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balachandar, S. 2024. Fundamentals of Dispersed Multiphase Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakumar, B. J., Orlicz, G. C., Tomkins, C. D., and Prestridge, K. P. 2008. Simultaneous Particle-Image Velocimetry-Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence Measurements of Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability Growth in a Gas Curtain with and without Reshock. Physics of Fluids, 20(124103).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasubramanian, S., Orlicz, G. C., Prestridge, K. P., and Balakumar, B. J. 2012. Experimental Study of Initial Condition Dependence on Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability in the Presence of Reshock. Physics of Fluids, 24, 034103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besnard, D., Harlow, F. H., Rauenzahn, R. M., and Zemach, C. 1992. Turbulence Transport Equations for Variable-Density Turbulence and Their Relationship to Two-Field Models. Technical Report LA-UR-92-12303. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaisdell, G. A., Mansour, N. N., and Reynolds, W. C. 1994. Compressibility Effects on the Passive Scalar Fux within Homogeneous Turbulence. Physics of Fluids, 6, 3498–3500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Book, D. L., Li, C., Patnaik, G., and Grinstein, F. F. 1991. Quantifying Residual Numerical Diffusion in Flux-Corrected Transport Algorithms. Journal of Scientific Computing, 6, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boris, J. P. 1990. On Large Eddy Simulation Using Subgrid Turbulence Models. Pages 344–353 of: Whither Turbulence? Turbulence at the Crossroads, Lumley, J. L. (ed). Springer.Google Scholar
Boris, J. P., Grinstein, F. F., Oran, E. S., and Kolbe, R. L. 1992. New Insights into Large Eddy Simulation. Fluid Dynamics Research, 10(4–6), 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, S. T., Moin, P., and You, D. 2010. Grid-Independent Large-Eddy Simulation Using Explicit Filtering. Physics of Fluids, 22, 105103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G. E. P. 1979. Robustness in the Strategy of Scientific Model Building. Pages 201–236 of: Robustness in Statistics, Launer, R. L., and Wilkinson, G. N. (eds). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brachet, M. E., Meiron, D. I., Orzag, S. A., Nickel, B. G., Morf, R. H., and Frisch, U. 1983. Small Scale Structure of the Taylor–Green Vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 130, 411–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouillette, M. 2002. The Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 34, 445–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celik, I., Klein, M., Freitag, M., and Janicka, J. 2006. Assessment Measures for URANS/DES/LES: An Overview with Applications. Journal of Turbulence, 7, N48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R. H., Dannevik, W. P., Dimits, A. M., Eliason, D. E., Mirin, A. A., Zhou, Y., Porter, D. H., and Woodward, P. R. 2002. Three-Dimensional Simulation of a Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability with a Two-Scale Initial Perturbation. Physics of Fluids, 14, 3692–3709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colella, P. 1982. Glimm’s Method for Gas Dynamics. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 3(1), 76–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colella, P., and Woodward, P. R. 1984. The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas-Dynamical Simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 54(1), 174–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P. A. 2006. Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dimotakis, P. E. 2000. The Mixing Transition in Turbulent Flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 409, 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J. A., and Adams, N. A. 2002. Direct Modeling of Subgrid Scales of Turbulence in Large Eddy Simulations. Journal of Turbulence, 3(24), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J. A., Xiao, Z., and Smolarkiewicz, P. 2003. Effective Eddy Viscosities in Implicit Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Flows. Physics of Fluids, 15, 3890–3893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drikakis, D., Fureby, C., Grinstein, F. F., and Youngs, D. 2007. Simulation of Transition and Turbulence Decay in the Taylor–Green Vortex. Journal of Turbulence, 8(20).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druault, P., Lardeau, S., Bonnet, J. P., Coiffet, F., F., Delville, J., Lamballais, E., Largeau, J. F., and Perret, L. 2004. Generation of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Inlet Conditions for Large-Eddy Simulation. AIAA Journal, 42, 447–456.Google Scholar
Fan, M., Wenren, Y., Dietz, W., Xiao, M., and Steinhoff, J. 2002. Computing Blunt Body Flows on Coarse Grids Using Vorticity Confinement. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124(4), 876–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasel, H. F., and von Terzi, D. A. 2006. A Methodology for Simulating Compressible Turbulent Flows. J. Appl. Mech., 73, 405–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, U. 1995a. Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frolich, J., and von Terzi, D. A. 2008. Hybrid LES/RANS Methods for the Simulation of Turbulent Flows. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 44, 349–77.Google Scholar
Fureby, C. 2009. LES Modeling of Combustion for Propulsion Applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 367, 2957–2969.Google ScholarPubMed
Fureby, C., and Grinstein, F. F. 2002. Large Eddy Simulation of High-Reynolds-Number Free and Wall-Bounded Flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 181(1), 68–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureby, C., and Grinstein, F. F. 1999. Monotonically Integrated Large Eddy Simulation of Free Shear Flows. AIAA Journal, 37(5), 544–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureby, C., and Tabor, G. 1997. Mathematical and physical constraints on large-eddy simulations. Theor. Computational Fluid Dynamics, 9, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, W. K., and Davidson, L. 2004a. Role of Initial Conditions in Establishing Asymptotic Flow Behavior. AIAA Journal, 42, 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, W. K. 1989. The Self-Preservation of Turbulent Flows and its Relation to Initial Conditions and Coherent Structures. In: Advances in Turbulence, George, W. K., and Arndt, R. E. A. (eds). Hemisphere Press.Google Scholar
George, W. K. 1990. Governing Equations, Experiments, and the Experimentalist. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 3, 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, W. K., and Davidson, L. 2004b. Role of Initial Conditions in Establishing Asymptotic Flow Behavior. AIAA Journal, 42(3), 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, W. K., and Tutkun, M. 2009. Mind the Gap: A Guideline for Large Eddy Simulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 1899, 2839–47.Google Scholar
Germano, M. 1992. The Filtering Approach. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 238, 325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germano, M. 1998. Readers’ Forum, Comment on Turbulence Modeling for Time-Dependent RANS and VLES: A Review. AIAA Journal, 36(9), 1766–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germano, M. 2007. A Direct Relation between the Filtered Subgrid Stress and the Second Order Structure Function. Physics of Fluids, 19, 038102/2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosal, S. 1996. An Analysis of Numerical Errors in Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulence. Journal of Computational Physics, 125(1), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittings, M., Weaver, R., Clover, M., Betlach, T., Byrne, N., Coker, R., Dendy, E., Hueckstaedt, R., New, K., Oakes, W. R., Ranta, D., and Stefan, R. 2008. The RAGE Radiation-Hydrodynamic Code. Computational Science & Discovery, 1(1), 015005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotoh, T., and Watanabe, T. 2012. Scalar Flux in a Uniform Mean Scalar Gradient in Homogeneous Isotropic Steady Turbulence. Physica D, 241, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowardhan, A. A., and Grinstein, F. F. 2011. Numerical Simulation of Richtmyer–Meshkov Instabilities in Shocked Gas Curtains. Journal of Turbulence, 12(43), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowardhan, A. A., Ristorcelli, J. R., and Grinstein, F. F. 2011. The Bipolar Behavior of the Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability. Physics of Fluids Letters, 23(071701).Google Scholar
Grinstein, F. F. 1995. Self-Induced Vortex Ring Dynamics in Subsonic Rectangular Jets. Physics of Fluids, 7(10), 2519–2521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F. 2001. Vortex Dynamics and Entrainment in Rectangular Free Jets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 437, 69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F. 2004. Boundary Conditions for Large Eddy Simulation. AIAA Journal Special Section, 42, 437–492.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F. F. 2009. On Integrating Large Eddy Simulation and Laboratory Turbulent Fow Experiments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 367, 2931–2945.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F. F. 2010. Vortex Dynamics and Transition in Free Shear Flows. Chap. 8 of: ILES: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics, Grinstein, F. F., Margolin, L. G., and Rider, W. J. (eds). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F. F. 2016. Coarse Grained Simulation and Turbulent Mixing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F. 2017. Initial Conditions and Modeling for Simulations of Shock Driven Turbulent Material Mixing. Computers and Fluids, 151, 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F. 2020. Coarse Grained Simulation of Convectively Driven Turbulent Mixing, Transition, and Turbulence Decay. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 407, 132419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F. 2024. Coarse Grained Simulation and Dynamic Bridging for Turbulent Mixing Predictions. Computers and Fluids, 271, 106185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F., and Fureby, C. 2007. On Flux-Limiting-Based Implicit Large Eddy Simulation. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 129(12), 1483–1492.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F. F., Margolin, L. G., and Rider, W. J. 2010. Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Flow Dynamics. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F. F., Gowardhan, A. A., and Wachtor, A. J. 2011. Simulations of Richtmyer–Meshkov Instabilities in Planar Shock-Tube Experiments. Physics of Fluids, 23(034106).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F., Saenz, J. A., Dolence, J. C., Masser, T. O., Rauenzahn, R. M., and Francois, M. M. 2019. Effects of Operator Splitting and Low Mach-Number Correction in Turbulent Mixing Transition Simulations. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 78(2), 437–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F., Saenz, J. A., Rauenzahn, R. M., Germano, M., and Israel, D. M. 2020. Dynamic Bridging Modeling for Coarse Grained Simulations of Shock Driven Turbulent Mixing. Physics of Fluids, 199, 104430.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F. F., Saenz, J. A., and Germano, M. 2021. Coarse Grained Simulations of Shock-Driven Turbulent Material Mixing. Physics of Fluids, 33(035131).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F., Pereira, F. S., and Rider, W. J. 2023. Numerical Approximations Formulated as LES Models. Chap. 10 of: Numerical Methods in Turbulence Simulations, Moser, R. (ed). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Grégoire, O., Souffland, D., and Gauthier, S. 2005. A Second-Order Turbulence Model for Gaseous Mixtures induced by Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability. Journal of Turbulence, 6(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillard, H., and Murrone, A. 2004. On the Behavior of Upwind Schemes in the Low Mach Number Limit: II. Godunov Type Schemes. Computers & Fluids, 33(4), 655–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmark, E., and Ho, C. M. 1983. Preferred Modes and the Spreading Rates of Jets. Physics of Fluids, 26, 2932.Google Scholar
Hahn, M., Drikakis, D., Youngs, D. L., and Williams, R. J. R. 2011. Richtmyer–Meshkov Turbulent Mixing Arising from an Inclined Material Interface with Realistic Surface Perturbations and Reshocked Flow. Physics of Fluids, 23, 046101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, B. M., Grinstein, F. F., and Schwarzkopf, J. D. 2013. Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Initialization and Benchmarking in Shock-Driven Turbulent Mixing. Journal of Turbulence, 14(2), 46–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, B. M., Grinstein, F. F., and Fincke, J. R. 2014. Three-Dimensional Simulation Strategy to Determine the Effects of Turbulent Mixing on Inertial-Confinement-Fusion Capsule Performance. Physical Review E, 89(5).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harten, A., Lax, P. D., and van Leer, B. 1983. On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. SIAM Review, 25(1), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. 1958. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hill, D. J., Pantano, C., and Pullin, D. I. 2006. Large-Eddy Simulation and Multiscale Modelling of a Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability with Reshock. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 557, 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirt, C. W. 1969. Computer Studies of Time-Dependent Turbulent Flows. Physics of Fluids, 12(12), II–219–II–227.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F., and Husain, H. S. 1989. Elliptic Jets. Part I. Characteristics of Unexcited and Excited Jets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 208, 257–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F., and Reynolds, W. C. 1970. The Mechanics of an Organized Wave in Turbulent Shear Flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 41(2), 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F., and Zedan, M. F. 1978. Effects of the Initial Condition on the Axisymmetric Free Shear Layer: Effect of the Initial Fluctuation Level. Physics of Fluids, 21, 1475–81.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J., Wray, A. A., Saffman, P. G., and Rogallo, R. S. 1993. The Structure of Intense Vorticity in Isotropic Turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 255, 6590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneda, Y., Ishihara, T., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K., and Uno, A. 2003. Energy Dissipation Rate and Energy Spectrum in High Resolution Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulence in a Periodic Box. Physics of Fluids, 15(2), L21–L24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanos, G-S., and Karniadakis, G. E. 2000. A Spectral Vanishing Viscosity Method for Large-Eddy Simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 163, 22–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokkinakis, I. W., and Drikakis, D. 2015. Implicit Large Eddy Simulation of weakly compressible turbulent channel flow. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 287, 229–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinov, E., Malamud, G., Elbaz, Y., Levin, A., Ben-dor, G., Shvarts, D., and Sadot, O. 2009. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability under Reshock Conditions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 626(449-75).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, A. 1975. Energy Cascade in Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Fluid Flows. Adv. in Geophysics, 18A, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesieur, M. 2008. Turbulence in Fluids. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leweke, T., Le, Dizés, S., and Williamson, C. H. K. 2016. Dynamics and Instabilities of Vortex Pairs. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 48(1), 507–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, G., and Gutmark, E. J. 2006. Experimental Study of Boundary Condition Effects on Non-Reacting and Re-Acting Flow in a Multi-Swirl Gas Turbine Combustor. AIAA Journal, 44, 444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. 1963. Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 3, 130–141.Google Scholar
Margolin, L. G. 2009. Finite-Scale Equations for Compressible Fluid flow. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 367, 2861–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margolin, L. G., and Rider, W. J. 2002. A Rationale for Implicit Turbulence Modeling. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids, 39, 821–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L. G., Rider, W. J., and Grinstein, F. F. 2006. Modeling Turbulent Flow with Implicit LES. Journal of Turbulence, 7(N15), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L. G., and Rider, W. J. 2010. Numerical Regularization: The Numerical Analysis of Implicit Subgrid Models. Chap. 5 of: ILES: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics, Grinstein, F. F., Margolin, L. G., and Rider, W. J. (eds). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Misra, A., and Pullin, D. I. 1997. A Vortex-Based Subgrid Stress Model for Large-Eddy Simulation. Physics of Fluids, 9, 2443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, W. C., and Balachandar, S. 2019. Lagrangian Investigation of Pseudo-Turbulence in Multiphase Flow Using Superposable Wakes. Physical Review Fluids, 4, 114301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, R. D., Haering, S. W., and Yalla, G. R. 2021. Statistical Properties of Subgrid-Scale Turbulence Models. Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics, 53, 255–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugler, C., and Gauthier, S. 2000. Two-Dimensional Navier–Stokes Simulations of Gaseous Mixtures Induced by Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability. Physics of Fluids, 12, 1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlicz, G. C., Balakumar, B. J., Tomkins, C. D., and Prestridge, K. P. 2009. A Mach Number Study of the Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability in a Varicose, Heavy-Gas Curtain. Physics of Fluids, 21(064102).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overholt, M. R., and Pope, S. B. 1996. Direct Numerical Simulation of a Passive Scalar with Imposed Mean Gradient in Isotropic Turbulence. Physics of Fluids, 8, 3128–3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parish, E. J., and Duraisamy, K. 2017. Non-Markovian Closure Models for Large Eddy Simulations Using the Mori–Zwanzig Formalism. Physical Review Fluids, 2, 014604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patnaik, G., Boris, J. P., Young, T. R., and Grinstein, F. F. 2007. Large Scale Urban Contaminant Transport Simulations with MILES. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 129, 1524–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, F. S., Eça, L., Vaz, G., and Girimaji, S. S. 2018. Challenges in Scale-Resolving Simulations of Turbulent Wake Flows with Coherent Structures. Journal of Computational Physics, 363, 98–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, F. S., Eça, L., Vaz, G., and Girimaji, S. S. 2019. On the Simulation of the Flow Around a Circular Cylinder at Re = 140,000. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 76, 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, F. S., Grinstein, F. F., and Israel, D. 2020. Effect of the Numerical Discretization Scheme in Shock-Driven Turbulent Mixing. Computers and Fluids, 201(104487).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, F. S., Grinstein, F. F., Israel, D. M., and Rauenzahn, R. 2021. Molecular Viscosity and Diffusivity Effects in Transitional and Shock-Driven Mixing Flows. Physical Review E, 103, 013106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, F. S., Grinstein, F. F., Israel, D. M., and Eça, L. 2022. Verification and Validation: The Path to Predictive Scale-Resolving Simulations of Turbulence. ASME Journal of Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification, 7(2), 021003.Google Scholar
Poggi, F., Thorembey, M.-H., and Rodriguez, G. 1998. Velocity Measurements in Turbulent Gaseous Mixtures Induced by Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability. Physics of Fluids, 10, 2698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 1990 (July). Computations of Turbulent Combustion: Progress and Challenges. In: Twenty Third Symposium (International) on Combustion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000. Turbulent Flows. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2004. Ten Questions Concerning the Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent flows. New Journal of Physics, 6(35), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, D. H., Woodward, P. R., and Pouquet, A. 1998. Inertial Range Structures in Decaying Turbulent Flows. Physics of Fluids, 10(237–245).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullin, D. I. 2000. A Vortex-Based Model for the Subgrid Flux of a Passive Scalar. Physics of Fluids, 12(2311).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaprabhu, P., Dimonte, G., and Andrews, M. J. 2005. A Numerical Study of the Influence of Initial Perturbations on the Turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor Instability. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 536, 285–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisner, J. M., Josephson, A. J., Gorkowski, K. J., Koo, E., Thompson, D. K., Schroeder, D., and Dubey, M. K. 2023. Informed Multi-Scale Approach Applied to the British Columbia Fires of Late Summer 2017. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128, e2022JD037238.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. F. 1927. The Deferred Approach to the Limit. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser., A226, 229–361.Google Scholar
Richtmyer, R. D. 1960. Taylor Instability in Shock Acceleration of Compressible Fluids. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths., 13, 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristorcelli, J. R. 2006. Passive Scalar Mixing: Analytic Study of Time Scale Ratio, Variance, and Mix Rate. Physics of Fluids, 18, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristorcelli, J. R. 2016. Material Conservation of Passive Scalar Mixing in Finite Scale Navier–Stokes Fluid Turbulence. Chap. 4 of: Coarse Grained Simulation and Turbulent Mixing, Grinstein, F. F. (ed). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ristorcelli, J. R., Gowardhan, A. A., and Grinstein, F. F. 2013. Two Classes of Richtmyer–Meshkov Instabilities: A Detailed Statistical Look. Physics of Fluids, 25(044106).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roache, P. J. 1997. Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics. Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics, 29, 123–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagaut, P., Deck, S., and Terracol, M. 2006. Multiscale and Multiresolution Approaches in Turbulence. Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiestel, R. 1987. Multiple-Time-Scale Modeling of Turbulent Flows in One-Point Closures. Physics of Fluids, 30(3), 722–731.Google Scholar
Schilling, O., and Latini, M. 2010. High-Order WENO Simulations of Three-Dimensional Reshocked Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability to Late Times: Dynamics, Dependence on Initial Conditions, and Comparisons to Experimental Data. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 30(2), 595–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzkopf, J. D., Livescu, D., Baltzer, J. R., Gore, R. A., and Ristorcelli, J. R. 2016. A Two-Length Scale Turbulence Model for Single-Phase Multi-Fluid Mixing. Flow, Turbulence, and Combustion, 96, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzkopf, J. D., Livescu, D., Gore, R. A., Rauenzahn, R. M., and Ristorcelli, J. R. 2011. Application of a Second-Moment Closure Model to Mixing Processes Involving Multi-Component Miscible Fluids. Journal of Turbulence, 49, 1–35.Google Scholar
Slessor, M. D., Bond, C. L., and Dimotakis, P. E. 1998. Turbulent Shear-Layer Mixing at High Reynolds Numbers: Effects of Inflow Conditions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 376, 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speziale, C. G. 1998. Turbulence Modeling for Time-Dependent RANS and VLES : A Review. AIAA Journal, 36(2), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1984. On the Scaling of the Turbulence Energy Dissipation Rate. Physics of Fluids, 27(1048).Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1998. An Update on the Energy Dissipation Rate in Isotropic Turbulence. Physics of Fluids, 10(528).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, S., Adams, N. A., and Kleiser, L. 2001. The Approximate Deconvolution Model for Large-Eddy Simulations of Compressible Flows and its Application to Shock-Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interaction. Physics of Fluids, 13(2985).Google Scholar
Tennekes, H., and Lumley, J. L. 1972. A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornber, B., Mosedale, A., and Drikakis, D. 2007. On the Implicit Large Eddy Simulation of Homogeneous Decaying Turbulence. Journal of Computational Physics, 226, 1902–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornber, B., Mosedale, A., Drikakis, D., Youngs, D., and Williams, R. J. R. 2008. An Improved Reconstruction Method for Compressible Flows with Low Mach Number Features. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(10), 4873–4894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornber, B., Drikakis, D., Youngs, D. L., and Williams, R. J. R. 2010. The Influence of Initial Conditions on Turbulent Mixing due to Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 654, 99–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro, E. F., Spruce, M., and Speares, W. 1994. Restoration of the Contact Surface in the HLL-Riemann Solver. Shock Waves, 4(1), 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976. Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsinober, A. 2009. An Informal Conceptual Introduction to Turbulence. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsinober, A. 2011. Models versus Physical Laws, First Principles, or Why Models Work? In: Workshop at Wolfgang Pauli Institute, Vienna, Austria, 2–4 February.Google Scholar
Tsinober, A. 2014. The Essence of Turbulence as a Physical Phenomenon. 1st ed. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uranga, A., Persson, P.-O., Drela, M., and Peraire, J. 2011. Implicit Large Eddy Simulation of Transition to Turbulence at Low Reynolds Numbers Using a Discontinuous Galerkin Method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 87, 232–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leer, B. 1997. Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme. Journal of Computational Physics, 135(2), 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassilicos, J. C. 2015a. Dissipation in Turbulent Flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 47, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassilicos, J. C. 2015b. Dissipation in Turbulent Flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 47(1), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verfaillie, S., Gutmark, E. J., Bonnet, J. P., and Grinstein, F. F. 2006. Linear Stochastic Estimation of a Swirling Jet. AIAA Journal, 44, 457–468.Google Scholar
Visbal, M. R., and Rizzetta, D. P. 2002. Large-Eddy Simulation on Curvilinear Grids Using Compact Differencing and Filtering Schemes. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124(4), 836–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Kaenel, R., Adams, N. A., Kleiser, L., and Vos, J. B. 2003. The Approximate Deconvolution Model for Large-Eddy Simulation of Compressible Flows With Finite Volume Schemes. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 125, 375–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachtor, A. J., Grinstein, F. F., DeVore, C. R., Ristorcelli, J. R., and Margolin, L. G. 2013. Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation of Passive Scalar Mixing in Statistically Stationary Isotropic Turbulence. Physics of Fluids, 25(025101).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, R., Wu, F., Xu, H., and Sherwin, S. J. 2021. Implicit Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Flow in a Channel via Spectral/hp Element Methods. Physics of Fluids, 33, 035130.Google Scholar
Warming, R. F., and Hyett, B. J. 1974. The Modified Equation Approach and the Stability and Accuracy Analysis of Finite-Difference Methods. Journal of Comp. Phys., 14, 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wygnanski, I., Champagne, F., and Marasli, B. 1986. On The Large-Scale Structures In Two-Dimensional, Small-Deficit, Turbulent Wakes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 168, 31–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, J., and Hussain, F. 2022. Vortex Reconnection and Turbulence Cascade. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 54, 317–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, P. K., Xu, S., and Sreenivasan, K. R. 2002. Schmidt Number Effects on Turbulent Transport with Uniform Mean Scalar Gradient. Physics of Fluids, 14, 4178–4191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2007. Unification and Extension of the Similarity Scaling Criteria and Mixing Transition for Studying Astrophysics Using High Energy Density Laboratory Experiments or Numerical Simulations. Physics of Plasmas, 14(082701).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017a. Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability Induced Flow, Turbulence, and Mixing. I. Physics Reports, 720–722, 1–136.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017b. Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability Induced Flow, Turbulence, and Mixing. II. Physics Reports, 723–725, 1–160.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Grinstein, F. F., Wachtor, A. J., and Haines, B. M. 2014. Estimating the Effective Reynolds Number in Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation. Physical Review E, 89(1), 013303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×