Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-01T13:10:31.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2023

Amy Gais
Amy Gais
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Coerced Conscience , pp. 137 - 147
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abizadeh, Arash. “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory.” American Political Science Review 105, no. 2 (2011): 298–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. “Publicity, Privacy, and Religious Toleration in Hobbes’ Leviathan.” Modern Intellectual History 10, no. 2 (2013): 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achinstein, Sharon. Milton and the Revolutionary Reader. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achinstein, Sharon, and Sauer, Elizabeth, eds. Milton and Toleration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jeremy. “The Role of Education in Political Stability.” Hobbes Studies 16, no. 1 (2003): 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Armitage, Himy, Armand, and Skinner, Quentin, eds. Milton and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. “Thinking about Religion, Belief, and Politics.” In Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies, edited by Orsi, Robert, 36–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal, Brown, Wendy, Butler, Judith, and Mahmood, Saba. Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre. A Philosophical Commentary on These Words of the Gospel, Luke 14.23, “Compel Them to Come In, That My House May Be Full.” Edited by Kilcullen, John and Kukathas, Chandran. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald. “Three Versions of the Politics of Conscience: Hobbes, Spinoza, Locke.” San Diego Law Review 47, no. 3 (2010): 1107–1134.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald. Civil Religion: A Dialogue in the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, Teresa. “Difference without Disagreement: Rethinking Hobbes on ‘Independency’ and Toleration.” Review of Politics 78, no. 1 (2016): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, Teresa. “First Impressions: Hobbes on Religion, Education, and the Metaphor of Imprinting.” In Hobbes on Politics and Religion, edited by Apeldoorn, Laurens van and Douglass, Robin, 45–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Bejan, Teresa. “Recent Work on Toleration.” Review of Politics 80, no. 4 (2018): 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, Teresa. “Teaching the Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Education.” Oxford Review of Education 36, no. 5 (2010): 607–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, Teresa. Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, Alan, and Pérez-Peña, Richard. “Kentucky Clerk Denies Same-Sex Marriage Licenses, Defying Court.” New York Times. Accessed September 1, 2015. www.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/us/same-sex-marriage-kentucky-kim-davis.html.Google Scholar
Bowlin, John. Tolerance among the Virtues. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Harald, and Vallance, Edward, eds. Context of Conscience in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1700. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cable, Lana. “Secularizing Conscience in Milton’s Republican Community.” In Milton and Toleration, edited by Achinstein, Sharon and Sauer, Elizabeth, 268–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, John. Persecution and Toleration in Protestant England, 1558–1689. London: Harlow, 2000.Google Scholar
Coffey, John. “Milton, Locke, and the New History of Toleration.” Modern Intellectual History 5, no. 3 (2008): 619–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Jeffrey. “Redeeming the Enlightenment: New Histories of Religious Toleration.” The Journal of Modern History 81, no. 3 (2009): 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Jeffrey. The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Cooper, Julie. “Freedom of Speech and Philosophical Citizenship in Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise.” Law, Culture, and the Humanities 2, no. 1 (2006): 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Julie. Secular Powers: Humility in Modern Political Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobranski, Stephen, and Rumrich, John, eds. Milton and Heresy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. “The Concept of Trust in the Politics of John Locke.” In Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, edited by Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, Jerome, and Skinner, Quentin, 279–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. “The Claim to Freedom of Conscience: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Freedom of Worship.” In From Persecution to Toleration: The Glorious Revolution and Religion in England, edited by Grell, Ole Peter, Israel, Jonathan, and Tyacke, Nicholas, 171–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisgruber, Christopher, and Sagar, Lawrence. Religious Freedom and the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. “Deliberation and Constitution Making.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon, 97–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Noah. Divided by God: America’s Church-State Problem – And What We Should Do about It. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2006.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. How Milton Works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Flanders, Chad, and Oliveira, Sean. “Whose Conscience? Which Complicity? Reconciling Burdens and Interests in the Law of Religious Liberty.” In Law and Religion in the Liberal State, edited by Bhuiyan, Jahid Hossain and Jensen, Darryn, 161–176. New York: Bloomsbury, 2020.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. “Pierre Bayle’s Reflective Theory of Toleration.” In Toleration and Its Limits, edited by Williams, Melissa and Waldron, Jeremy, 78–113. New York: NYU Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. “Religion, Reason, and Toleration: Bayle, Kant – And Us.” In Religion and Liberal Political Philosophy, edited by Laborde, Cécile and Bardon, Aurelia, 249–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Freed, Curt, and Ingersoll, Robert. “Why We Sued Our Favorite Florist: Marriage Equality Must Be Truly Equal.” Seattle Times. Accessed March 1, 2021. www.seattletimes.com/opinionwhy-true-marriage-equality-matters-to-us.Google Scholar
Gais, Amy. “The Politics of Hypocrisy: Baruch Spinoza and Pierre Bayle on Hypocritical Conformity.” Political Theory 48, no. 5 (2020): 588–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gais, Amy. “Thomas Hobbes and ‘Gently Instilled’ Conscience.” History of European Ideas 47, no. 8 (2021): 1211–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Mahatma. Selected Political Writings. Edited by Dalton, Dennis. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1996.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P., and Girgis, Sherif. “A Baker’s First Amendment Rights.” New York Times. Accessed May 1, 2018. www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/opinionfirst-amendment-wedding-cake.html.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark. “The Theory of Intolerance in Restoration Britain.” In From Persecution to Toleration: The Glorious Revolution and Religion in England, edited by Grell, Ole Peter, Israel, Jonathan, and Tyacke, Nicholas, 331–368. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew. “Milton and Catholicism.” In Milton and Toleration, edited by Achinstein, Sharon and Sauer, Elizabeth, 186–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew. Lying in Early Modern English Culture: From the Oath of Supremacy to the Oath of Allegiance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanin, Mark. “Thomas Hobbes’s Theory of Conscience.” History of Political Thought 33, no. 1 (2012): 55–85.Google Scholar
Henry, Julie. “Freedom of Conscience in Spinoza’s Political Treatise: Between Sovereign Limitations and Citizen Demand.” Reformation and Renaissance Review 14, no. 1 (2012): 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Behemoth, or Long Parliament. Edited by Tönnies, Ferdinand. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. De Cive. Edited by Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan, Volume 2. Edited by Malcolm, Noel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch. “The End of Philosophy (The Case of Hobbes).” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106, no. 1 (2006): 25–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Ann. “Afterword.” In Milton and Toleration, edited by Achinstein, Sharon and Sauer, Elizabeth, 299–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man, 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Susan. Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, David. The Rhetoric of Leviathan: Hobbes and the Politics of Cultural Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. “The Metaphorical Contract in Milton’s Tenure of Kings and Magistrates.” In Milton and Republicanism, edited by Armitage, David, Himy, Armand and Skinner, Quentin, 82–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. Machiavellian Rhetoric from the Counter-Reformation to Milton. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Benjamin. Divided by Faith: Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Jr., Martin Luther. “Letter from a Birmingham City Jail.” In A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King Jr., edited by Washington, James. New York: Harper Collins, 1990.Google Scholar
Krom, Michael. The Limits of Reason in Hobbes’s Commonwealth. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Kukathas, Chandran. “Toleration without Limits: A Reconstruction and Defense of Pierre Bayle’s Philosophical Commentary.” In Religion and Liberal Political Philosophy, edited by Laborde, Cécile and Bardon, Aurelia, 262–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. Private Truth, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile. Liberalism’s Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laycock, Douglas. “Religious Liberty and the Culture Wars.” University of Illinois Law Review 3 (2014): 839–880.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara. The Life of John Milton. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
Lilla, Mark. The Stillborn God: Religion, Politics, and the Modern West. New York: Vintage, 2008.Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam. “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides with Baker Who Turned Away Gay Couple.” New York Times. Accessed June 4, 2018. www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-baker-who-turned-away-gay-couple.html.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Sally A. Ideals as Interests in Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Sally A. Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: Cases in the Law of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Sally A. Interpreting Hobbes’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, David. Treacherous Faith: The Specter of Heresy in Early Modern English Literature and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank. “Milton’s Case for a Free Commonwealth.” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 3 (2005): 466–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclure, Jocelyn, and Charles, Taylor. Secularism and Freedom of Conscience. Translated by Jane, Marie Todd. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Maltzahn, Nicholas von. Milton’s History of Britain: Republican Historiography in the English Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzahn, Nicholas von. “The Whig Milton, 1667–1700.” In Milton and Republicanism, edited by Armitage, David, Himy, Armand, and Skinner, Quentin, 229–253. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzahn, Nicholas von. “Milton, Marvell, and Toleration.” In Milton and Toleration, edited by Achinstein, Sharon and Sauer, Elizabeth, 86–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, Susanna, and Rosenfeld, Michel, eds. The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, John. John Locke, Toleration, and Early Enlightenment Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
McClure, Kirstie. “Difference, Diversity, and the Limits of Toleration.” Political Theory 18, no. 3 (1990): 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrary, Charles. Sincerely Held: American Religion, Secularism, and Belief. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIvor, Méadhbh. “Water in the Desert.” Anthropology News. Accessed March 1, 2021. https://anthropology-news.org/index.php/2020/12/11/water-in-the-desert.Google Scholar
McQueen, Alison. Political Realism in Apocalyptic Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Complete Prose Works of John Milton, Volume 1–8. Edited by Wolfe, Don. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1953–82.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew. Conscience and Community: Revisiting Toleration and Religious Dissent in Early Modern England and America. University Park, PN: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew. Liberty, Conscience, and Toleration: The Political Thought of William Penn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Myers, Benjamin. “‘Following the Way Which Is Called Heresy’: Milton and the Heretical Imperative.” Journal of the History of Ideas 69, no. 3 (2008): 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven. Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
NeJaime, Douglas, and Siegel, Reva B.. “Conscience Wars: Complicity-Based Conscience Claims in Religion and Politics,” Yale Law Journal 124, no. 7 (2015): 2516–2591.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America’s Tradition of Religious Equality. New York: Basic Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. “Remarks in Hartford, Connecticut: ‘A Politics of Conscience’” (Speech, Hartford, CT, June 23, 2007). The American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=76986.Google Scholar
Ojakangas, Mika. The Voice of Conscience: A Political Genealogy of Western Ethical Experience. New York: Bloomsburg, 2013.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon. Taming the Leviathan: The Reception of Thomas Hobbes’s Political and Religious Ideas in England 1640–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. Early Modern Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. Milton’s Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pear, Robert, and Peters, Jeremy W.. “Trump Gives Health Workers New Religious Liberty Protections.” New York Times. Accessed March 1, 2018. www.nytimes.com/2018/01/18/us/health-care-office-abortion-contraception.html.Google Scholar
Perkins, William. William Perkins, 1558–1602, English Puritanist, His Pioneer Works on Casuistry: “A Discourse of Conscience” and “The Whole Treatise of Cases of Conscience”. Edited by Merrill, Thomas. Netherlands: Nieuwkoop and B. De Graaf, 1996.Google Scholar
Platt, Elizabeth Reiner, Franke, Katherine, Shepherd, Kira, and Hadjiivanova, Lilia. “Whose Faith Matters? The Fight for Religious Liberty beyond the Christian Right.” Columbia Law School, Law, Rights, and Religion Project. Accessed March 1, 2021. https://lawrightsreligion.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/Images/Whose%20Faith%20Matters%20Full%20Report%2012.12.19.pdf.Google Scholar
Ploof, Rebecca. “The Automaton, the Actor and the Sea Serpent: Leviathan and the Politics of Metaphor.” History of Political Thought 39, no. 4 (2018): 634–661.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard. The History of Scepticism: From Savanarola to Bayle, Expanded Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qudrat, Maryam. “Confronting Jihad: A Defect in the Hobbesian Educational Strategy.” In Hobbes Today: Insights for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Lloyd, S. A., 229–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rogers, Melvin, and Turner, Jack. African American Political Thought: A Collected History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael. “Spinoza’s Republican Argument for Toleration.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11, no. 3 (2003): 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, David. Political Hypocrisy: The Mask of Power, from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond, Revised Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Samuel. A Free Disputation against Pretended Liberty of Conscience. London: Printed by R.I. for Andrew Crook, 1649.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. “A More Tolerant Hobbes?” In Justifying Toleration: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives, edited by Mendus, Susan, 37–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Alan. “Hobbes, Toleration, and the Inner Life.” In The Nature of Political Theory, edited by Miller, David and Seidentop, Larry, 197–218. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. “Religious Liberty: Freedom of Choice or Freedom of Conscience.” In Secularism and its Critics, edited by Bhargava, Rajeev, 85–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sauer, Elizabeth. ‘Paper Contestations’ and Textual Communities in England, 1640–1675. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Elizabeth. “Milton’s Of True Religion, Protestant Nationhood, and the Negotiation of Liberty.” Milton Quarterly 40, no. 1 (2006): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Victoria. “Milton’s Equitable Grounds of Toleration.” In Milton and Toleration, edited by Achinstein, Sharon and Sauer, Elizabeth, 144–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Vision of Politics, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smallenburg, Harry. “Government of the Spirit: Style, Structure and Theme in Treatise of Civil Power.” In Achievements of the Left Hand: Essays on the Prose of John Milton Achievements of the Left Hand, edited by Lieb, Michael and Shawcross, John, 219–238. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Smith, Nigel. Is Milton Better than Shakespeare? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven. Spinoza, Liberalism, and the Question of Jewish Identity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. The Collected Works of Spinoza, Volume 2. Edited and translated by Curley, Edwin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurr, John. “The Strongest Bond of Conscience: Oaths and the Limits of Tolerance in Early Modern England.” In Contexts of Conscience in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1700, edited by Braun, Harald and Vallance, Edward, 151–165. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Justin. “Spinoza’s Curious Defense of Toleration.” In Spinoza’s ‘Theological-Political Treatise’: A Critical Guide, edited by Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael, 231–249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Stoll, Abraham. Conscience in Early Modern English Literature, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, Jeffrey. “Religion Unbound: Ideals and Powers from Cicero to King.” Gifford Lecture Series, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, May 2, 2017.Google Scholar
Strohm, Paul. Conscience: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutzman, Barronelle. “Why a Friend Is Suing Me: The Arlene’s Flowers Story.” Seattle Times. Accessed March 1, 2021. www.seattletimes.com/opinionwhy-a-good-friend-is-suing-me-the-arlenes-flowers-story.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Winnifred, Elizabeth, Shakman Saba Mahmood, Hurd, and Peter, Danchin, eds. Politics of Religious Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Winnifred. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Swaine, Lucas. “Freedom of Thought as a Basic Liberty.” Political Theory 46, no. 3 (2018): 405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaine, Lucas. Liberal Conscience: Politics and Principle in a World of Religious Pluralism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Targoff, Ramie. Common Prayer: The Language of Public Devotion in Early Modern England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David. Thoreau: Political Writings. Edited by Rosenblum, Nancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David. Thoreau: Collected Essays and Poems. Edited by Hall Witherell, Elizabeth. New York: Penguin, 2001.Google Scholar
Tralau, Johan. “Hobbes Contra Liberty of Conscience.” Political Theory 39, no. 1 (2010): 58–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. “Hobbes and Locke on Toleration.” In Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, edited by Dietz, Mary, 153–171. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. “Hobbes, Conscience, and Christianity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, edited by Martinich, Aloysius Patrick and Hoekstra, Kinch, 579–601. Oxford: Oxford University, 2016.Google Scholar
Turchetti, Maria. “Religious Concord and Political Tolerance in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century France.” The Sixteenth Century Journal 22, no. 1 (1991): 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uddin, Asma. When Islam Is Not a Religion: Inside America’s Fight for Religious Freedom. New York: Pegasus Books, 2019.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Geoffrey. Behemoth Teaches Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Political Education. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Vischer, Robert. Conscience and the Common Good: Reclaiming the Space between Person and State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Locke, Toleration and the Rationality of Persecution.” In Justifying Toleration: Conceptual and Historical Approaches, edited by Mendus, Susan, 61–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. God, Locke, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Hobbes on Public Worship.” In Toleration and Its Limits, edited by Waldron, Jeremy and Williams, Melissa, 31–53. New York: New York University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra. “Ordeals of Conscience: Casuistry, Conformity and Confessional Identity in Post-Reformation England.” In Contexts of Conscience in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1700, edited by Braun, Harald and Vallance, Edward, 32–48. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra. Charitable Hatred: Tolerance and Intolerance in England, 1500–1700. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. On Toleration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Warren, Scott. “In Defense of Wilderness: Policing Public Borderlands,” South Atlantic Quarterly 116, no. 4: 863–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Melissa, and Waldron, Jeremy, eds. Toleration and Its Limits. New York: New York University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. Literature and Politics in Cromwellian England: John Milton, Andrew Marvell, Marchamont Nedham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worden, Blair. Roundhead Reputations: The English Civil War and the Passions of Posterity. New York: Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. Literature and Politics in Cromwellian England: John Milton, Andrew Marvell, Marchamont Nedham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu. Spinoza and Other Heretics, The Marrano of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu. The Other Within: The Marranos: Split Identity and Emerging Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. Ways of Lying: Dissimulation, Persecution and Conformity in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurbuchen, Simone. “Republicanism and Toleration.” In Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage, Volume 2, edited by Skinner, Quentin and Gelderen, Martin van, 47–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Amy Gais, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Coerced Conscience
  • Online publication: 07 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009371964.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Amy Gais, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Coerced Conscience
  • Online publication: 07 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009371964.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Amy Gais, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Coerced Conscience
  • Online publication: 07 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009371964.007
Available formats
×