Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:16:27.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2023

Aileen Kavanagh
Aileen Kavanagh
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Collaborative Constitution , pp. 417 - 485
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, A (2008a) ‘The Ombudsman and Individual Rights’ (2008) 61 Parliamentary Affairs 370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, A (2008b) ‘The Ombudsman as Part of the UK Constitution: A Contested Role?’ (2008) 61 Parliamentary Affairs 206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamson, S & Hughes, R (1991) ‘Shall We Dance? Steps for Legislators and Judges in Statutory Interpretation’ (1991) 75 Minnesota Law Review 1045Google Scholar
Ackerman, B (2000) ‘The New Separation of Powers’ (2000) 113 Harvard Law Review 633Google Scholar
Ackerman, B (2010) ‘Good-bye, Montesquieu’ in Rose-Ackerman, & Lindseth, (eds.) Comparative Administrative Law: An Introduction (Edward Elgar)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, E (2021) ‘Judicial Discretion and the Declaration of Incompatibility: Constitutional Considerations in Controversial Cases’ 2021 Public Law 311Google Scholar
Adams, E & Bower, E (2022) ‘Notwithstanding History: The Rights-Protecting Purposes of Section 33 of the Charter’ (2022) 26 Review of Constitutional Studies 121Google Scholar
Ahmed, F, Albert, R & Perry, A (2019) ‘Judging Constitutional Conventions’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, F, Albert, R & Perry, A (2020) ‘Enforcing Constitutional Conventions’ (2020) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R (2008) ‘Advisory Review: The Reincarnation of the Notwithstanding Clause’ (2008) 45 Alberta Law Review 1037Google Scholar
Albert, R (2009) ‘The Fusion of Presidentialism and Parliamentarism’ (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R (2010) ‘Presidential Values in Parliamentary Democracies’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R (2018) ‘The Desuetude of the Notwithstanding Clause – And How to Revive It’ in MacFarlane, (ed.) Policy Change, Courts, and the Canadian Constitution (University of Toronto Press)Google Scholar
Albert, R & Pal, M (2018) ‘The Democratic Resilience of the Canadian Constitution’ in Graber, , Levinson, & Tushnet, (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Allan, TRS (1993) Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Allan, TRS (2006a) ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of “Due Deference”’ (2006) 65 Cambridge Law Journal 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, TRS (2006b) ‘Publication Review: Our Republican Constitution’ [2006] Public Law 172Google Scholar
Allan, TRS (2013) The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, TRS (2014) ‘Accountability to Law’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Allison, J (1994) ‘Fuller’s Analysis of Polycentric Disputes and the Limits of Adjudication’ (1994) 53 Cambridge Law Journal 367Google Scholar
Allison, J (2007) The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, G & Verba, S (1989) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Sage Publishing)Google Scholar
Amery, L (1964) Thoughts on the Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Amos, M (2004) ‘R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Anderson: Ending the Home Secretary’s Sentencing Role’ (2004) 67 Modern Law Review 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anastaplo, G (2004) ‘Loyal Opposition in a Modern Democracy’ (2004) 35 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 1009Google Scholar
Anderson, D (2014) ‘The Independent Review of Terrorism Laws’ [2014] Public Law 403Google Scholar
Appleby, G (2012) ‘The Evolution of a Public Sentinel: Australia’s Solicitor-General’ (2012) 63 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 397Google Scholar
Appleby, G (2016) ‘Reform of the Attorney General: Comparing Britain and Australia’ [2016] Public Law 573Google Scholar
Appleby, G (2017) ‘Horizontal Accountability: The Rights-Protective Promise and Fragility of Executive Integrity Institutions’ (2017) 23 Australian Journal of Human Rights 168Google Scholar
Appleby, G, MacDonnell, V & Synot, E (2020) ‘The Pervasive Constitution: The Constitution outside the Courts’ (2020) 48 Federal Law Review 437Google Scholar
Appleby, G & Olijnyk, A (2017) ‘Parliamentary Deliberation on Constitutional Limits in the Legislative Process’ (2017) 40 University of New South Wales Law Journal 976Google Scholar
Appleby, G & Olijnyk, A (2020) ‘Executive Policy Development and Constitutional Norms: Practice and Perceptions’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnardóttir, O (2017) ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 9Google Scholar
Atiyah, P (1988) ‘Judicial Legislative Relations in England’ in Katzmann, (ed.) Judges and Legislators: Towards Institutional Comity (Brookings Institution)Google Scholar
Axelrod, R (1990) The Evolution of Cooperation (Penguin)Google Scholar
Axworthy, T (2007) ‘The Notwithstanding Clause: Sword of Damocles or Paper Tiger?’ (2007) 25 Policy Options 58Google Scholar
Bailey, D (2020a) ‘Bridging the Gap: Legislative Drafting Practice and Statutory Interpretation’ [2020] Public Law 220Google Scholar
Bailey, D (2020b) ‘Interpreting Parliamentary Inaction’ (2020) 79 Cambridge Law Journal 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D (2010) Not Quite Supreme: The Courts and Coordinate Constitutional Interpretation (McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar
Baker, D (2019) ‘A Feature, Not a Bug: A Coordinate Moment in Canadian Constitutionalism’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Balkin, J (2008) ‘Constitutional Hardball and Constitutional Crises’ (2008) 26 Quinnipiac Law Review 579Google Scholar
Balkin, J (2016) ‘The Framework Model and Constitutional Interpretation’ in Dyzenhaus, & Thorburn, (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Balkin, J (2018) ‘Constitutional Crisis and Constitutional Rot’ in Graber, , Levinson, & Tushnet, (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Bamforth, N (2013) ‘Accountability of and to the Legislature’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baraggia, A, Fasone, C & Vanoni, L (2020) New Challenges to the Separation of Powers: Dividing Power (Edward Elgar)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak, A (2006) The Judge in a Democracy (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Barak, A (2010) ‘Proportionality and Principled Balancing’ (2010) 4 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 1Google Scholar
Barak, A (2012) Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N (2001) ‘Prelude to the Separation of Powers’ (2001) 60 Cambridge Law Journal 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N (2013) ‘Self-Defence for Institutions’ (2013) 72 Cambridge Law Journal 558Google Scholar
Barber, N, Hickman, T & King, J (2017) ‘Reflections on Miller’ (2017) 8 United Kingdom Supreme Court Yearbook 212Google Scholar
Barendt, E (1995) ‘Separation of Powers and Constitutional Government’ [1995] Public Law 599Google Scholar
Barendt, E (1997) ‘Is There a UK Constitution?’ (1997) 17 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 137Google Scholar
Barendt, E (1998) An Introduction to Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baroš, J, Dufek, P & Kosař, D (2020) ‘Unpacking the Separation of Powers’ in Baraggia, , Fasone, & Vanoni, (eds.) New Challenges to the Separation of Powers (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Barrett, A (2010) ‘Substantive Canons and Faithful Agency’ (2010) 90 Boston University Law Review 109Google Scholar
Barrett, A (2017) ‘Countering the Majoritarian Difficulty’ (2017) 32 Constitutional Commentary 61Google Scholar
Bar-Siman-Tov, I (2011) ‘The Puzzling Resistance to Judicial Review of the Legislative Process’ (2011) 91 Boston University Law Review 1915Google Scholar
Bar-Siman-Tov, I (2015) ‘The Role of Courts in Improving the Legislative Process’ (2015) 3 Theory and Practice of Legislation 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsotti, V, et al. (2017) Italian Constitutional Justice in Global Context (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Basten, J (2017) ‘The Principle of Legality – an Unhelpful Label?’ in Meagher, & Groves, (eds.) The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand (The Federation Press)Google Scholar
Bates, E (2014) ‘Analysing the Prisoner Voting Saga and the British Challenge to Strasbourg’ (2014) 14 Human Rights Law Review 503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E (2015) ‘Sophisticated Constructivism in Human Rights Compliance Theory’ (2015) 25 European Journal of International Law 1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E (2017) ‘Democratic Override (or Rejection) and the Authority of the Strasbourg Court: The UK Parliament and Prisoner Voting’ in Saul, , Follesdal, & Ulstein, (eds.) The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Bates, E (2019) ‘Principled Criticism and a Warning from the “UK” to the ECtHR?’ in Breur, (ed.) Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments: A New Paradigm? (Springer)Google Scholar
Bateup, C (2006) ‘The Dialogic Promise’ (2006) 71 Brooklyn Law Review 1109Google Scholar
Bateup, C (2007) ‘Expanding the Conversation: American and Canadian Experiences of Constitutional Dialogue in Comparative Perspective’ (2007) 21 Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Bateup, C (2009) ‘Reassessing the Dialogic Possibilities of Weak-Form Bills of Rights’ (2009) 32 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 529Google Scholar
Bator, P (1990) ‘The Constitution as Architecture: Legislative and Administrative Courts under Article III’ (1990) 65 Indiana Law Journal 233Google Scholar
Bauman, R & Kahana, T, eds. (2006) The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Beatson, J (1998) ‘The Need to Develop Principles of Prematurity and Ripeness for Review’ (1998) 3 Judicial Review 79Google Scholar
Beatson, J (2013) ‘Human Rights and Judicial Technique’ in Masterman, & Leigh, (eds.) The United Kingdom’s Statutory Bill of Rights: Constitutional and Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Beatson, J (2021) The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Bejan, T (2017) Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration (Harvard University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J (2016) ‘Comparative Law and Fundamental Rights’ in Bell, & Paris, (eds.) Rights-Based Constitutional Review (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Bell, J (2020) ‘Common Law Constitutional Rights and Executive Action’ in Elliott, & Hughes, (eds.) Common Law Constitutional Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Bellah, R, et al. (2008) Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (University of California Press)Google Scholar
Bellamy, R (2011) ‘Political Constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act’ (2011) 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C (2022) ‘Boris Johnson’s Future: A Philosophical Exercise for a Wavering MP’ The Conversation article (1 June 2022). Available at: https://theconversation.com/boris-johnsons-future-a-philosophical-exercise-for-wavering-tory-mps-184106Google Scholar
Bennion, F (2001) Understanding Common Law Legislation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Bentham, J (1843) The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Published under the Superintendence of his Executor John Bowring vol. 2 (W. Tait)Google Scholar
Benton, M & Russell, M (2012) ‘Assessing the Impact of Parliamentary Oversight Committees: The Select Committees in the British House of Commons’ [2012] Parliamentary Affairs 1Google Scholar
Berger, R (1997) Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment (Liberty Fund)Google Scholar
Bethlehem, D (2012) ‘The Secret Life of International Law’ (2012) 1 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 23Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C (2006) The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Bickel, A (1961) ‘The Supreme Court 1960 Term. Foreword: The Passive Virtues’ (1961) 75 Harvard Law Review 40Google Scholar
Bickel, A (1986) The Least Dangerous Branch 2nd ed. (Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Bingham, T (2000) The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches 1985–1999 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Bingham, T (2010) ‘The Human Rights Act’ (2010) 6 European Human Rights Law Review 568Google Scholar
Bingham, T (2011) Lives of the Law: Selected Essays and Speeches 2000–2010 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Binnie, I (2013) ‘Judging the Judges: “May They Boldly Go Where Ivan Rand Went Before’ (2013) 26 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 5Google Scholar
Birch, D (2003) ‘Untangling Sexual History Evidence: A Rejoinder to Professor Temkin’ [2003] Criminal Law Review 370Google Scholar
Bjorge, E (2016) ‘Common Law Rights: Balancing Domestic and International Exigencies’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 220Google Scholar
Blackburn, D (2011) ‘Davis and Straw Unite against Prisoner Voting Rights’ The Spectator (18 January 2011)Google Scholar
Blackbourn, J (2012) ‘Evaluating the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation’ [2012] Parliamentary Affairs 1Google Scholar
Blackstone, W (2016 [1765–69]) Commentaries on the Laws of England (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Blair, T (2011) Tony Blair: A Journey (Arrow Books)Google Scholar
Blakeney, A (2006) ‘Judges: Canada’s New Aristocracy – An Interview with Alan Blakeney’ (2006) 18 Inroads 31Google Scholar
Blakeney, A (2010) ‘The Notwithstanding Clause, the Charter and Canada’s Patriated Constitution: What I Thought We Were Doing’ (2010) 19 Constitutional Forum 1Google Scholar
Blick, A & Hennessy, P (2019) ‘Good Chaps No More? Safeguarding the Constitution in Stressful Times’ The Constitution Society blogpost (18 November 2019). Available at: https://consoc.org.uk/publications/good-chaps-no-more-safeguarding-the-constitution-in-stressful-times-by-andrew-blick-and-peter-hennessy/Google Scholar
Blondel, J (1970) ‘Legislative Behaviour: Some Steps towards a Cross-National Measurement’ (1970) 5 Government & Opposition 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blunkett, D (2003) ‘It’s Time for Judges to Learn Their Place’ News of the World (23 February 2003)Google Scholar
Blunkett, D (2006) The Blunkett Tapes: My Life in the Bearpit (Bloomsbury)Google Scholar
Bobbitt, P (1982) Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Bogg, A (2018) ‘Judicial Power and the Left: Deference, Partnership, and Defiance’ (9 January 2018) in Ekins, & Gee, (eds.) Judicial Power and the Left: Notes on a Sceptical Tradition (Policy Exchange). Available at: https://judicialpowerproject.org.uk/alan-bogg-judicial-power-and-the-left-deference-partnership-and-defiance/Google Scholar
Bogg, A (2022) ‘Can We Trust the Courts in Labour Law? Stranded Between Frivolity and Despair’ (2022) 38 International Journal of Comparative Labour Law 103Google Scholar
Bowcott, O (2017) ‘Lord Chief Justice Attacks Liz Truss for Failing to Back Article 50 Judges’ The Guardian (22 March 2017)Google Scholar
Bowcott, O (2020) ‘Legal Profession Hits Back at Johnson over “Lefty Lawyers” Speech’ The Guardian (2 October 2020). Available at: www.theguardian.com/law/2020/oct/06/legal-profession-hits-back-at-boris-johnson-over-lefty-lawyers-speechGoogle Scholar
Bowman, G (2005) ‘Why Is There a Parliamentary Counsel?’ (2005) 26 Statute Law Review 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, A & Ewing, K (2011) Constitutional and Administrative Law, 15th rev ed. (Longman)Google Scholar
Bradley, C & Siegel, N (2017) ‘Historical Gloss, Constitutional Conventions, and Judicial Separation of Powers’ (2017) 105 Georgetown Law Journal 255Google Scholar
Brady, A (2012) Proportionality and Deference: An Institutionally Sensitive Approach (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M (1992) ‘Shared Cooperative Activity’ (1992) 101 Philosophical Review 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M (2014) Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Brazier, A & Fox, R (2011) ‘Reviewing Select Committee Tasks and Modes of Operation’ 2011 Parliamentary Affairs 354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazier, R (2020) ‘Contempt for the Constitution’ UK Constitutional Law Association blogpost (6 October 2020). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2020/10/06/rodney-brazier-contempt-for-the-constitution/Google Scholar
Brems, E (2017) ‘The “Logics” of Procedural-Type Review by the European Court of Human Rights’ in Gerards, & Brems, (eds.) Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Brenncke, M (2018) Judicial Law-Making in English and German Courts: Techniques and Limits of Statutory Interpretation (Intersentia)Google Scholar
Bright, M & Hinsliff, G (2001) ‘Chaos: How War on Terror Became a Political Dogfight’ The Observer (11 September 2001)Google Scholar
Brogan, B (2005) ‘Blair: Judges Let Us Down’ The Daily Mail (27 July 2005)Google Scholar
Brosseau, L & Roy, M-A (2018). The Notwithstanding Clause of the Charter: Background Paper. Service, PIaR. Ottawa, Canada, Library of Parliament.Google Scholar
Brown, S (1994) ‘Public Interest Immunity’ 1994 Public Law 579Google Scholar
Brown, S (2020) Playing off the Roof and other Stories: A Patchwork of Memories (Marble Hill London)Google Scholar
Browne-Wilkinson, N (1992) ‘The Infiltration of a Bill of Rights’ [1992] Public Law 397Google Scholar
Brunnée, J & Toope, S (2010) Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Bulman-Pozen, J & Gerken, H (2009) ‘Uncooperative Federalism’ (2009) 118 Yale Law Journal 1256Google Scholar
Burgess, S (1992) Contest for Constitutional Authority: The Abortion and War Powers Debates (University of Kansas Press)Google Scholar
Burnett, I (2018) ‘Becoming Stronger Together’ Paper presented at Commonwealth Judges and Magistrates’ Association Annual Conference 2018. Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Burrows, A (2018) Thinking about Statutes: Interpretation, Interaction, Improvement (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R (1992) The Constitution in Conflict (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Caird, JS (2012) ‘Parliamentary Constitutional Review: Ten Years of the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution’ [2012] Public Law 4Google Scholar
Caird, J, Hazell, R & Oliver, D (2015) The Constitutional Standards of the House of Lords Select Committees on the Constitution (The Constitution Society)Google Scholar
Calhoun, C (2000) ‘The Virtue of Civility’ (2000) 29 Philosophy and Public Affairs 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D (2019) For the Record (William Collins)Google Scholar
Cameron, J (2001) ‘Dialogue and Hierarchy in Charter Interpretation: A Comment on R. v. Mills’ (2001) 38 Alberta Law Review 1051Google Scholar
Cameron, J (2004) ‘The Charter’s Legislative Override: Feat or Figment of the Constitutional Imagination’ in Huscroft, & Brodie, (eds.) Constitutionalism in the Charter Era (LexisNexis Canada)Google Scholar
Cameron, J (2016) ‘Collateral Thoughts on Dialogue’s Legacy as Metaphor and Theory: A Favourite from Canada’ (2016) 35 University of Queensland Law Journal 157Google Scholar
Campbell, T (1999) ‘Human Rights: A Culture of Controversy’ (1999) 26 Journal of Law & Society 6Google Scholar
Campbell, T (2001) ‘Incorporation through Interpretation’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T (2011) ‘Parliamentary Review with a Democratic Charter of Rights’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T, Ewing, K & Tomkins, A, eds. (2001) Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Campbell, T, Ewing, K & Tomkins, A, (2011) ‘Introduction’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Cane, P (2016) Controlling Administrative Power: An Historical Comparison (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Cardozo, B (1921) The Nature of the Judicial Process (Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Carolan, E (2009) The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the Modern State (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Carolan, E (2011) ‘The Relationship between Judicial Remedies and the Separation of Powers: Collaborative Constitutionalism and the Suspended Declaration of Invalidity’ (2011) 46 Irish Jurist 180Google Scholar
Carolan, E (2016a) ‘Dialogue Isn’t Working: The Case for Collaboration as a Model of Legislative–Judicial Relations’ (2016) 36 Legal Studies 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolan, E (2016b) ‘Leaving Behind the Commonwealth Model of Rights Review: Ireland as an Example of Collaborative Constitutionalism’ in Bell, & Paris, (eds.) Right-Based Constitutional Review: Constitutional Courts in a Changing Landscape (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Carolan, E (2017) ‘A Dialogue-Oriented Departure in Constitutional Remedies? The Implications of NHV v Minister for Justice for Inter-Branch Roles and Relationships’ (2017) 40 Dublin University Law Journal 191Google Scholar
Cartabia, M (2016) ‘Of Bridges and Walls: The “Italian Style” of Constitutional Adjudication’ (2016) 1 Italian Journal of Public Law 37Google Scholar
Cartabia, M (2020) ‘Editorial: Courts’ Relations’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 3Google Scholar
Carter, M (2019) ‘Diefenbaker’s Bill of Rights and the “Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty”: The Notwithstanding Clause and Fundamental Justice as Touchstones for the Charter Debate’ (2019) 82 Saskatchewan Law Review 121Google Scholar
Carter, S (1998) Civility: Manners, Morals, and the Etiquette of Democracy (Harper Collins)Google Scholar
Casey, C (2019) ‘The Constitution outside the Courts – The Case for Parliamentary Involvement in Constitutional Review’ (2019) 61 Irish Jurist 36Google Scholar
Casey, C (2021) ‘The Law Officers: The Relationship between Executive Lawyers and Executive Power in Ireland and the United Kingdom’ in Doyle, , McHarg, & Murkens, (eds.) The Brexit Challenge for Ireland and the UK: Constitutions under Pressure (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Casey, C & Kenny, D (2022) ‘The Gatekeepers: Executive Lawyers and the Executive Power in Comparative Constitutional Law’ (2022) 20 International Journal of Constitutional Law 664Google Scholar
Cash, W (2005) ‘Terrorism and the Rule of Law’ The Times (2 August 2005)Google Scholar
Chafetz, J (2011) ‘The Political Animal and the Ethics of Constitutional Commitment’ (2011) 124 Harvard Law Review Forum 1Google Scholar
Chafetz, J & Pozen, D (2018) ‘How Constitutional Norms Break Down’ (2018) 65 UCLA Law Review 1430Google Scholar
Chan, C (2014) ‘Business as Usual: Deference in Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review’ in Davis, & De Londras, (eds.) Critical Debates in Counter-Terrorism Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Chan, C (2017) ‘A Preliminary Framework for Measuring Deference in Rights Reasoning’ (2017) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 851Google Scholar
Chan, C (2018) ‘Rights, Proportionality and Deference: A Study of Post-Handover Judgments in Hong Kong’ (2018) 48 Hong Kong Law Journal 51Google Scholar
Chandrachud, C (2014) ‘Reconfiguring the Discourse on Political Responses to Declarations of Incompatibility’ [2014] Public Law 624Google Scholar
Chandrachud, C (2017) Balanced Constitutionalism: Courts and Legislatures in India and the United Kingdom (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Chandrachud, C & Kavanagh, A (2016) ‘Rights-Based Constitutional Review in the UK: From Form to Function’ in Bell, & Paris, (eds.) Rights-Based Constitutional Review (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Chang, B & Ramshaw, G (2017) Strengthening Parliamentary Capacity for the Protection and Realisation of Human Rights (Westminster Foundation for Democracy)Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J (2006) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor (Palgrave Macmillan)Google Scholar
Chen, B (2015) ‘The Principle of Legality: Issues of Rationale and Application’ (2015) 41 Monash University Law Review 329Google Scholar
Christiano, T (2000) ‘Waldron on Law and Disagreement’ (2000) 19 Law and Philosophy 520Google Scholar
Cicero, M (2000) Cicero: On Obligations Translated by Walsh (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Clark, T (2022) ‘Peter Hennessy: Boris Johnson Has Killed off the “Good Chaps” Theory of Government’ Prospect (21 January 2022). Available at: www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/peter-hennessy-interview-good-chaps-theory-of-government-boris-johnsonGoogle Scholar
Claus, L (2005) ‘Montesquieu’s Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation of Powers’ (2005) 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, R (2004) ‘Judicial Deference and “Democratic Dialogue”: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’ 2004 Public Law 33Google Scholar
Clements, L (2005) ‘Winners and Losers’ (2005) 32 Journal of Law and Society 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coenen, D (2001) ‘A Constitution of Collaboration: Protecting Fundamental Values with Second-Look Rules of Interbranch Dialogue’ (2001) 42 William and Mary Law Review 1575Google Scholar
Coenen, D (2009) ‘The Pros and Cons of Politically Reversible “Semisubstantive” Constitutional Rules’ (2009) 77 Fordham Law Review 2835Google Scholar
Coffin, F (1988) ‘Judicial Balancing: The Protean Scales of Justice’ (1988) 63 New York University Law Review 16Google Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, M & Porat, I (2013) Proportionality and Constitutional Culture (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Cohler, A, Miller, B & Stone, H (1989) Montesquieu: The Spirit of the Laws (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Cohn, M (2007) ‘Judicial Activism in the House of Lords: A Composite Constitutionalist Approach’ [2007] Public Law 95Google Scholar
Cohn, M (2013) ‘Sovereignty, Constitutional Dialogues, and Political Networks: A Comparative and Conceptual Study’ in Rawlings, , Leyland, & Young, (eds.) Sovereignty and the Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Cohn, M (2016) ‘Tension and Legality: Towards a Theory of the Executive Branch’ (2016) 39 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colón-Ríos, J (2012) Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the question of constituent power (Routledge)Google Scholar
Colón-Ríos, J (2014) ‘A New Typology of Judicial Review of Legislation’ (2014) 3 Global Constitutionalism 143Google Scholar
Conger, J (2008) The Necessary Art of Persuasion (Harvard Business Press)Google Scholar
Cooke, R (2004) ‘The Road Ahead for the Common Law’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 273Google Scholar
Cooper, J & Marshal-Williams, A (2000) Legislating for Human Rights: The Parliamentary Debates on the Human Rights Bill (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Cossman, B (2019) ‘Same-Sex Marriage beyond Charter Dialogue: Charter Cases and Contestation within Government’ (2019) 69 University of Toronto Law Journal 183Google Scholar
Coughlan, S (2003) ‘Justification in the Face of Competing Social and Political Philosophies’ (2003) 5 Criminal Reports 208Google Scholar
Coxon, B (2014) ‘Human Rights at Common Law: Two Interpretive Principles’ (2014) 35 Statute Law Review 35Google Scholar
Coyne, A (2017) ‘Notwithstanding Clause Is a Bottle Labelled ‘Drink Me’ That Cheapens the Charter’ The National Post (3 May 2017)Google Scholar
Craig, P (2010) ‘Political Constitutionalism and Judicial Review’ in Forsyth, et al. (eds.) Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Craig, P (2013) ‘The Nature of Reasonableness’ (2013) 66 Current Legal Problems 131Google Scholar
Craig, P (2017) ‘Miller, Structural Constitutional Review and the Limits of Prerogative Power’ [2017] Public Law 48Google Scholar
Craig, P (2020) ‘The Supreme Court, Prorogation and Constitutional Principle’ 2020 Public Law 248Google Scholar
Craiutu, A (2012) A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830 (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Craiutu, A (2017) Faces of Moderation: The Art of Balance in an Age of Extremes (University of Pennsylvania Press)Google Scholar
Cranston, R (2013) ‘Lawyers, MPs and Judges’ in Feldman, (ed.) Law in Politics, Politics in Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Crawford, C (2013) ‘Dialogue and Declarations of Incompatibility under Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2013) 25 Denning Law Journal 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, C (2014) ‘Dialogue and Rights-Compatible Interpretations under Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2014) 25 King’s Law Journal 34Google Scholar
Crewe, E (2005) Lords of Parliament: Manners, Rituals and Politics (Manchester University Press)Google Scholar
Crewe, E (2015a) Commons and Lords: A Short Anthropology of Parliament (Haus Curiosities)Google Scholar
Crewe, E (2015b) The House of Commons: An Anthropology of MPs at Work (Bloomsbury)Google Scholar
Crewe, E (2021) The Anthropology of Parliaments: Entanglements in Democratic Politics (Routledge)Google Scholar
Crick, B (1990) ‘The Reform of Parliament’ in Norton, (ed.) Legislatures (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Croley, S (1995) ‘The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law’ (1995) 62 University of Chicago Law Review 689Google Scholar
Cross, R (1995) Statutory Interpretation ed. Bell, & Engels, (Butterworths)Google Scholar
Crowe, E (1983) ‘Consensus and Structure in Legislative Norms: Party Discipline in the House of Commons’ (1983) 45 Journal of Politics 907Google Scholar
Culbertson, A (2022) ‘Boris Johnson Changes Ministerial Code so Those Who Breach It Don’t Have to Quit or Face Sack’ report on Sky News (27 May 2022). Available at: https://news.sky.com/story/boris-johnson-changes-ministerial-code-so-those-who-breach-it-dont-have-to-quit-or-face-sack-12622599Google Scholar
Cyr, H (2014) ‘Autonomy, Subsidiarity, Solidarity: Foundations of Cooperative Federalism’ (2014) 23 Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 20Google Scholar
da Silva, VA (2011) ‘Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision’ (2011) 31 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daintith, T & Page, A (1999) The Executive in the Constitution: Structure, Autonomy, and Internal Control (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Daly, P (2012) A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law: Basis, Application and Scope (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Daly, T (2017) The Alchemists: Questioning Our Faith in Courts as Democracy-Builders (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Dann, P (2005) ‘Thoughts on a Methodology of European Constitutional Law’ (2005) 6 German Law Journal 1453Google Scholar
Dann, P (2019) ‘Governments’ in Masterman, & Schütze, (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Davies, S (1984) ‘Truth-Values and Metaphors’ (1984) 42 Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 291Google Scholar
Davis, F (2010) ‘The Human Rights Act and Juridification: Saving Democracy from Law’ (2010) 30 Politics 91Google Scholar
Davis, F (2014a) ‘Parliamentary Supremacy and the Re-Invigoration of Institutional Dialogue in the UK’ (2014) 67 Parliamentary Affairs 137Google Scholar
Davis, F (2014b) ‘The Politics of Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: Creating Effective Parliamentary Scrutiny’ in Davis, & De Londras, (eds.) Critical Debates in Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, F & de Londras, F, eds. (2014a) Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Davis, F & de Londras, F , (2014b) ‘Introduction: Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: Beyond Dichotomies’ in Davis, & De Londras, (eds.) Critical Debates in Counter-terrorism Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Davis, F & Mead, D (2014) ‘Declarations of Incompatibility, Dialogue and the Criminal Law’ (2014) 43 Common Law World Review 62Google Scholar
Dawson, M (1992) ‘The Impact of the Charter on the Public Policy Process and the Department of Justice’ (1992) 30 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 595Google Scholar
de Búrca, G (1993) ‘The Principle of Proportionality and Its Application in EC Law’ (1993) 13 Yearbook of European Law 105Google Scholar
de Jouvenel, B (1966) ‘The Means of Contestation’ (1966) 1 Government & Opposition 155Google Scholar
de Londras, F (2013) ‘Declarations of Incompatibility under the ECHR Act 2003: A Workable Transplant?’ (2013) 35 Statute Law Review 50Google Scholar
de Londras, F (2017) ‘In Defence of Judicial Innovation and Constitutional Evolution’ in Cahillane, , Hickey, & Gallen, (eds.) Judges, Politics and the Irish Constitution (Manchester University Press)Google Scholar
de Londras, F & Davis, F (2010) ‘Controlling the Executive in Times of Terrorism: Competing Perspectives on Effective Oversight Mechanisms’ (2010) 30 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19Google Scholar
de Visser, M (2004) Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis (Bloomsbury/Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
de Visser, M (2022) ‘Non-Judicial Constitutional Interpretation: The Netherlands’ in Law, (ed.) Constitutionalism in Context (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Delaney, E (2014) ‘Judiciary Rising: Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom’ (2014) 108 Northwestern University Law Review 543Google Scholar
Delaney, E (2016) ‘Analyzing Avoidance: Judicial Strategy in Comparative Perspective’ (2016) 66 Duke Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Determan, L & Heinzten, M (2018) ‘Constitutional Review of Statutes in Germany and the United States Compared’ (2018) 28 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 95Google Scholar
Devins, N (2017) ‘Why Congress Does Not Challenge Judicial Supremacy’ (2017) 58 William & Mary Law Review 1495Google Scholar
Devins, N & Fisher, L (2015) The Democratic Constitution 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Devlin, P (1976) ‘Judges and Lawmakers’ (1976) 39 Modern Law Review 1Google Scholar
Dicey, AV (1964) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 10th ed. (Macmillan)Google Scholar
Dickson, J (2001) Evaluation and Legal Theory (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Dickson, J (2015a) ‘Ours Is a Broad Church: Indirectly Evaluative Legal Philosophy as a Facet of Jurisprudential Inquiry’ (2015) 6 Jurisprudence 207Google Scholar
Dickson, J (2015b) ‘Who’s Afraid of Transnational Legal Theory? Dangers and Desiderata’ (2015) 6 Transnational Legal Theory 565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinan, J (2001) ‘Rights and the Political Process: Physician-Assisted Suicide in the Aftermath of Washington v Glucksberg’ (2001) 31 Publius: The Journal of Federalism 1Google Scholar
Dittert, A (2021) ‘The Politics of Lies: Boris Johnson and the Erosion of the Rule of Law’ The New Statesman (15 July 2021). Available at: www.newstatesman.com/politics/2021/07/politics-lies-boris-johnson-and-erosion-rule-law.Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2007) ‘Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong-Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited’ (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 391Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2009a) ‘A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?’ (2009) 37 Federal Law Review 335Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2009b) ‘The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference’ (2009) 47 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 235Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2012) ‘Weak-Form Judicial Review and American Exceptionalism’ (2012) 32 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 487Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2017) ‘The Core Case for Weak-Form Judicial Review’ (2017) 38 Cardozo Law Review 2193Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2019a) ‘Constitutional “Dialogue” and Deference’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2019b) ‘The Forms, Functions, and Varieties of Weak(ened) Judicial Review’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 904Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2020) ‘Calibrated Proportionality’ (2020) 48 Federal Law Review 92Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2021) ‘Strong Courts: Judicial Statecraft in Aid of Constitutional Change’ (2021) 59 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 298Google Scholar
Dixon, R (2023) Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Dixon, R & Issacharoff, S (2016) ‘Living to Fight another Day: Judicial Deferral in Defense of Democracy’ [2016] Wisconsin Law Review 683Google Scholar
Dixon, R & Stone, A, eds. (2018) The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Dodek, A (2010) ‘Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and Legal Ethics: Government Lawyers and Custodians of the Rule of Law’ (2010) 33 Dalhousie Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Dodek, A (2016) ‘The Canadian Override: Constitutional Model or Bete Noire of Constitutional Politics?’ (2016) 49 Israel Law Review 45Google Scholar
Donald, A (2015) ‘The Implementation of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights against the UK: Unravelling the Paradox’ in Ziegler, , Wicks, , & Hodson, (eds.) The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship? (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Donald, A (2017) ‘Parliaments as Compliance Partners in the European Convention on Human Rights System’ in Saul, , Follesdal, & Ulfstein, (eds.) The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Donald, A & Leach, P (2016) Parliaments and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Döring, H (1995) ‘Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda’ in Doring, (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe (University of Mannheim)Google Scholar
Dotan, Y (2014) Lawyering for the Rule of Law: Government Lawyers and the Rise of Judicial Power in Israel (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Draghici, C (2015) ‘The Blanket Ban on Assisted Suicide: Between Moral Paternalism and Utilitarian Justice’ (2015) 3 European Human Rights Law Review 286Google Scholar
Drewry, G (1981) ‘Lawyers in the UK Civil Service’ (1981) 59 Public Administration 15Google Scholar
Duclos, N & Roach, K (1991) ‘Constitutional Remedies as “Constitutional Hints”: A Comment’ (1991) 36 McGill Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Duffy, H (2018) Strategic Human Rights Litigation: Understanding and Maximising Impact (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Duxbury, N (2017) ‘Judicial Disapproval as a Constitutional Technique’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 649Google Scholar
Dworkin, R (1977) Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R (1985) A Matter of Principle (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R (1986) Law’s Empire (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R (1996) Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Dyer, C (2000) ‘Ruling Neutralises “Two Strikes” Law’ The Guardian (10 November 2000)Google Scholar
Dyer, C, White, M & Travis, A (2004) ‘Judges’ Verdict on Terror Laws Provokes Constitutional Crisis’ The Guardian (17 December)Google Scholar
Dyson, J (2018) Justice: Continuity and Change (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (1997) ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in Taggart, (ed.) The Province of Administrative Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (1998) ‘Reuniting the Brain: The Democratic Basis of Judicial Review’ (1998) 9 Public Law Review 98Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2004a) ‘Intimations of Legality amid the Clash of Arms’ (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 244Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2004b) ‘The Genealogy of Legal Positivism’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 39Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2004c) ‘The Left and the Question of Law’ (2004) 17 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 7Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2006) The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2007) ‘Deference, Security and Human Rights’ in Goold, & Lazarus, (eds.) Security and Human Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2009) ‘Are Legislatures Good at Morality? Or Better at It than the Courts?’ (2009) 7 International Journal of Constitutional Law 46Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2012) ‘Constitutionalism in an Old Key: Legality and Constituent Power’ (2012) 2 Global Constitutionalism 229Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2014) ‘Proportionality and Deference in a Culture of Justification’ in Huscroft, , Miller, & Webber, (eds.) Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2015) ‘What is a Democratic Culture of Justification?’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Edwards, J (1984) The Attorney General, Politics, and the Public Interest (Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar
Edwards, R (2002) ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 859Google Scholar
Ekins, R (2012) The Nature of Legislative Intent (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Ekins, R (2019) ‘Constitutional Conversations in Britain (in Europe)’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Ekins, R & Sales, P (2011) ‘Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2011) 127 Law Quarterly Review 217Google Scholar
Elgot, J (2021) ‘Trust in Law is at Risk if Ministers Bypass MPs’ The Guardian (19 February 2021)Google Scholar
Elias, S (2015) ‘Judgery and the Rule of Law’ (2015) 14 Otago Law Review 1Google Scholar
Elias, P (2018) ‘Judicial Power and the Balance of our Constitution: Comment’ (2 February 2018). Available at: http://judicialpowerproject.org.uk/sir-patrick-elias-qc-comment/Google Scholar
Ellickson, R (1991) Order without Law: How Neighbours Settle Disputes (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Elliott, M (2002) ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Order: Legislative Freedom, Political Reality and Convention’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies 340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M (2011) ‘Interpretative Bills of Rights and the Mystery of the Unwritten Constitution’ 2011 New Zealand Law Review 591Google Scholar
Elliott, M (2013) ‘Ombudsmen, Tribunals, Inquiries: Re-fashioning Accountability Beyond the Courts’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Elliott, M (2015a) ‘Beyond the European Convention: Human Rights and the Common Law’ (2015) 68 Current Legal Problems 85Google Scholar
Elliott, M (2015b) ‘From Bifurcation to Calibration: Twin-Track Deference and the Culture of Justification’ in Wilberg, & Elliott, (eds.) The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Elliott, M (2015c) ‘Legislative Supremacy in a Multi-Dimensional Constitution’ in Elliott, & Feldman, (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Public Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Elliott, M (2020) ‘The Fundamentality of Rights at Common Law’ in Elliott, & Hughes, (eds.) Common Law Constitutional Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Elliott, M & Hughes, K, eds. (2020) Common Law Constitutional Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Elliott, M & Thomas, R (2020) Public Law 4th ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Elster, J (2000) Ulysses Unbound (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Elster, J (2010) ‘Unwritten Constitutional Norms’ Unpublished manuscript. Available at: https://perma.cc/YPN8-764GGoogle Scholar
Elster, J (2018) ‘The Resistible Rise of Louis Bonaparte’ in Sunstein, (ed.) Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America (Harper Collins)Google Scholar
Elster, J, Offe, C, & Preuss, U (1998) Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Ely, JH (1980) Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Ely, JH (1991) ‘Another Such Victory: Constitutional Theory and Practice in a World Where Courts Are No Different from Legislatures’ (1991) 77 Virginia Law Review 833Google Scholar
Endicott, T (1999) ‘The Impossibility of the Rule of Law’ (1999) 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2002) ‘“International Meaning”: Comity in Fundamental Rights Adjudication’ (2002) 13 International Journal of Refugee Law 280Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2003) ‘Constitutional Logic’ (2003) 53 University of Toronto Law Journal 201Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2009) ‘Habeas Corpus and Guantánamo Bay: A View from Abroad’ (2009) 54 American Journal of Jurisprudence (Notre Dame) 1Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2014) ‘Proportionality and Incommensurability’ in Huscroft, , Miller, & Webber, (eds.) Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2015a) ‘Comity Among Authorities’ (2015) 68 Current Legal Problems 1Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2015b) ‘Was Entick v Carrington a Landmark?’ in Tomkins, & Scott, (eds.) Entick v Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2017a) ‘The Stubborn Stain Theory of Executive Power: From Magna Carta to Miller’ The Judicial Power Project at Policy Exchange. Available at: https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/the-stubborn-stain-theory-of-executive-power/Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2017b) ‘Lord Reed’s Dissent in Gina Miller’s Case and the Principles of Our Constitution’ (2017) 8 United Kingdom Supreme Court Yearbook 259.Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2020a) ‘How Judges Make Law’ in Fisher, , King, & Craig, (eds.) The Foundations and Future of Public Law: Essays in Honour of Paul Craig (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2020b) ‘Human Rights and the Executive’ (2020) 11 Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 597Google Scholar
Endicott, T (2021) Administrative Law, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Engle, G (1983) ‘Bills Are Made to Pass as Razors Are Made to Sell: Practical Constraints in the Preparation of Legislation’ (1983) 4 Statute Law Review 7Google Scholar
Epp, C (2008) ‘Implementing the Rights Revolution: Repeat Players and the Interpretation of Diffuse Legal Messages’ (2008) 71 Law & Contemporary Problems 41Google Scholar
Eskridge, W (2000) ‘The Circumstances of Politics and the Application of Statutes’ (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 558Google Scholar
Eskridge, W & Ferejohn, J (2001) ‘Super-Statutes’ (2015) 50 Duke Law Journal 1215Google Scholar
Eskridge, W & Ferejohn, J (2009) ‘Constitutional Horticulture: Deliberation-Respecting Judicial Review’ (2009) 87 Texas Law Review 1273Google Scholar
Eskridge, W & Frickey, P (1992) ‘Quasi-Constitutional Law: Clear Statement Rules as Constitutional Lawmaking’ (1992) 45 Vanderbilt Law Review 593Google Scholar
Eskridge, W & Frickey, P (1994) ‘Foreword: Law as Equilibrium’ (1994) 108 Harvard Law Review 26Google Scholar
Estlund, C (2003) Working Together: How Workplace Bonds Strengthen a Diverse Democracy (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Etherton, T (2010) ‘Liberty, the Archetype and Diversity: A Philosophy of Judging’ [2010] Public Law 727Google Scholar
Evans, C & Evans, S (2006a) ‘Evaluating the Performance of Legislatures’ 2006 Human Rights Law Review 545Google Scholar
Evans, C & Evans, S (2006b) ‘Legislative Scrutiny Committees and Parliament Conceptions of Human Rights’ [2006] Public Law 785Google Scholar
Evans, C & Evans, S (2011) ‘Messages from the Front Line: Parliamentarians’ Perspectives on Rights Protection’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Ewing, K (1999) ‘The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 79Google Scholar
Ewing, K (2004) ‘The Futility of the Human Rights Act’ [2004] Public Law 829Google Scholar
Ewing, K (2012) ‘Doughty Defenders of the Human Rights Act’ in Kang-Riou, (ed.) Confronting the Human Rights Act 1998: Contemporary Themes and Perspectives (Taylor and Francis)Google Scholar
Ewing, K & Tham, J-C (2008) ‘The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act’ [2008] Public Law 668Google Scholar
Fallon, R (1997) ‘Foreword: Implementing the Constitution’ (1997) 111 Harvard Law Review 54Google Scholar
Fallon, R (2001) Implementing the Constitution (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Feldman, D (1999) ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and Constitutional Principles’ (1999) 19 Legal Studies 165Google Scholar
Feldman, D (2002a) ‘Book Review of Sceptical Essays on Human Rights edited by Tom Campbell, KD Ewing and Adam Tomkins’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies 651Google Scholar
Feldman, D (2002b) ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation and Human Rights’ [2002] Public Law 323Google Scholar
Feldman, D (2004a) ‘Can and Should Parliament Protect Human Rights?’ (2004) 10 European Public Law 635Google Scholar
Feldman, D (2004b) ‘The Impact of Human Rights on the UK Legislative Process’ (2004) 25 Statute Law Review 91Google Scholar
Feldman, D (2005) ‘None, One or Several? Perspectives on the UK’s Constitution(s)’ (2005) 64 Cambridge Law Journal 329Google Scholar
Feldman, D (2006) ‘Human Rights, Terrorism and Risk: The Role of Politicians and Judges’ [2006] Public Law 364Google Scholar
Feldman, D (2007) ‘Institutional Roles and Meanings of “Compatibility” under the Human Rights Act 1998’ in Fenwick, , Phillipson, & Masterman, (eds.) Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act 1998 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Feldman, D (2009) ‘Remedies for Violations of Convention Rights’ in Feldman, (ed.) English Public Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Feldman, D, ed. (2013) Law in Politics, Politics in Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Feldman, D, (2014) ‘Sovereignties in Strasbourg’ in Rawlings, , Leyland, & Young, (eds.) Sovereignty and the Law: Domestic, European and International Perspectives (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Feldman, D, (2015) ‘Democracy, Law, and Human Rights: Politics as Challenge and Opportunity’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Feldman, D, (2021) Submission to the Independent Human Rights Act Review. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1040525/ihrar-final-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, H (2011) ‘Recalibrating ECHR Rights and the Role of the Human Rights Act Post 9/11: Reasserting International Human Rights Norms in the “War on Terror”’ (2011) 64 Current Legal Problems 153Google Scholar
Fenwick, H (2014) ‘Post 9/11 UK Counter-Terrorism Cases in the European Court of Human Rights: A “Dialogic” Approach to Rights Protection or Appeasement of National Authorities?’ in Davis, & de Londras, (eds.) Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Fenwick, H & Phillipson, G (2011) ‘Covert Derogations and Judicial Deference: Redefining Liberty and Due Process Rights in Counter-terrorism Law and Beyond’ (2011) 56 McGill Law Journal 864Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J & Kramer, L (2002) ‘Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Institutionalising Judicial Restraint’ (2002) 77 New York University Law Review 962Google Scholar
Finnemore, M & Sikkink, K (1998) ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’ (1998) 52 International Organisation 887Google Scholar
Finnis, J (2007) ’Nationality, Alienage and Constitutional Principle’ (2007) 123 Law Quarterly Review 417Google Scholar
Finnis, J (2011a) Natural Law and Natural Rights 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Finnis, J (2011b) Reason in Action: Collected Essays Volume I (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Finnis, J (2015) ‘A British “Convention Right” to Assistance in Suicide?’ (2015) 131 Law Quarterly Review 1Google Scholar
Finnis, J (2016) ‘Judicial Law-Making and the “Living” Instrumentalisation of the ECHR’ in Barber, , Ekins, & Yowell, (eds.) Lord Sumption and the Limits of the Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Fisher, L (1971) ‘The Efficiency Side of the Separation of Powers’ (1971) 5 Journal of American Studies 113Google Scholar
Fisher, L & Devins, N (1992) Political Dynamics of Constitutional Law (West Publishing)Google Scholar
Flaherty, M (1996) ‘The Most Dangerous Branch’ (1996) 105 Yale Law Journal 1725Google Scholar
Fletcher, J & Howe, P (2001) ‘Public Opinion and Canada’s Courts’ in Howe, & Russell, (eds.) Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy (McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar
Flinders, M (2002) ‘Shifting the Balance? Parliament, the Executive and the British Constitution’ (2002) 50 Political Studies 23Google Scholar
Flinders, M (2012) Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Flinders, M & Kelso, A (2011) ‘Mind the Gap: Political Analysis, Public Expectations and the Parliamentary Decline Thesis’ (2011) 13 British Journal of Politics and International Relations 249Google Scholar
Foley, B (2008) Deference and the Presumption of Constitutionality (Institute of Public Administration)Google Scholar
Foley, M (1989) The Silence of Constitutions: Gaps, ‘Abeyances’ and Political Temperament in the Maintenance of Government (Routledge)Google Scholar
Fombad, C (2016a) ‘An Overview of Separation of Powers under Modern African Constitutions’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Fombad, C (2016b) ‘The Role of Emerging Hybrid Institutions of Accountability in the Separation of Powers Scheme in Africa’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Fontana, D (2009) ‘Government in Opposition’ (2009) 119 Yale Law Journal 548Google Scholar
Ford, R & Gibb, F (2003) ‘Judges Are Failing to Do Their Jobs, Says Blunkett’ The Times (8 May 2003)Google Scholar
Fordham, M (2020) Judicial Review Handbook, 7th ed. (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Forrest, A (2022) ‘Boris Johnson “Misled Parliament on Partygate”, ex-No 10 Staff Ready to Tell Inquiry’ The Independent (9 August 2022)Google Scholar
Foster-Gilbert, C (2018) ‘Introduction’ in Neuberger, & Riddell, (eds.) The Power of Judges (Haus Publishing)Google Scholar
Fowkes, J (2016a) Building the Constitution: The Practice of Constitutional Interpretation of Post-Apartheid South Africa (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Fowkes, J (2016b) ‘Relationships with Power: Re-imagining Judicial Roles in Africa’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Fowkes, J & Fombad, C (2016) ‘Introduction’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Fraser, C (2005) ‘Constitutional Dialogues between Courts and Legislatures: Can We Talk?’ (2005) 14 Constitutional Forum 7Google Scholar
Fredman, S (2000) ‘Judging Democracy: The Role of the Judiciary under the HRA 1998’ (2000) 53 Current Legal Problems 99Google Scholar
Fredman, S (2013) ‘Adjudication as Accountability: A Deliberative Approach’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Fredman, S (2015) ‘From Dialogue to Deliberation: Human Rights Adjudication and Prisoners’ Rights to Vote’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Freeman, E (1872) The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest Times (Macmillan)Google Scholar
French, R (2019) ‘The Principle of Legality and Legislative Intention’ (2019) 40 Statute Law Review 40Google Scholar
Friedman, B (1992) ‘When Rights Encounter Reality: Enforcing Federal Remedies’ (1992) 65 Southern Californian Law Review 735Google Scholar
Friedman, B (1993) ‘Dialogue and Judicial Review’ (1993) 91 Michigan Law Review 577Google Scholar
Friedman, B (2001) ‘The Counter-Majoritarian Problem and the Pathology of Constitutional Scholarship’ (2001) 95 Northwestern University Law Review 933Google Scholar
Friedman, B (2002) ‘The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five’ (2002) 112 Yale Law Journal 153Google Scholar
Friedman, B (2005) ‘The Politics of Judicial Review’ (2005) 84 Texas Law Review 257Google Scholar
Friendly, HJ (1963) ‘The Gap in Lawmaking – Judges Who Can’t and Legislators Who Won’t’ (1963) 62 Columbia Law Review 787Google Scholar
Fuller, L (1968) Anatomy of the Law (Penguin Books)Google Scholar
Fuller, L (1978) ‘The Form and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harvard Law Review 353Google Scholar
Fumurescu, A (2013) Compromise: A Political and Philosophical History (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gageler, S (2011) ‘Common Law Statutes and Judicial Legislation: Statutory Interpretation as a Common Law Process’ (2011) 37 Monash University Law Review 1Google Scholar
Gageler, S (2015) ‘Legislative Intention’ (2015) 41 Monash University Law Review 1Google Scholar
Gale, C & James, A (2002) ‘Mandatory Life Sentences and Executive Interference’ (2002) 66 Journal of Criminal Law 417Google Scholar
Gambetta, D, ed. (1988) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2001) ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’ (2001) 49 American Journal of Comparative Law 707Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2008) ‘The Myth and the Reality of American Constitutional Exceptionalism’ (2008) 107 Michigan Law Review 391Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2010) ‘Reassessing the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 167Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2011) ‘How Successful and Distinctive Is the Human Rights Act? An Expatriate Comparatist’s Assessment’ (2011) 74 Modern Law Review 195Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2013a) ‘The Case for the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 2229Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2013b) The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2014) ‘Proportionality and Democratic Constitutionalism’ in Huscroft, , Miller, & Webber, (eds.) Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2015) ‘What’s so Weak about Weak-Form Review? A Reply to Aileen Kavanagh’ (2015) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1040Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2018) ‘What Makes for More or Less Powerful Constitutional Courts?’ (2018) 29 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 1Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2020a) ‘Comparative Political Process Theory’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1429Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2020b) ‘The Counter-Playbook: Resisting the Populist Assault on Separation of Powers’ (2020) 59 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 1Google Scholar
Gardner, J (2002) ‘Reasons for Teamwork’ (2002) 8 Legal Theory 495Google Scholar
Gardner, J (2010) ‘How to Be a Good Judge’ (2010) 32 London Review of Books 15Google Scholar
Gardner, J (2012) Law as a Leap of Faith: Essays on Law in General (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Garlicki, L (2008) ‘Cooperation of Courts: The Role of Supranational Jurisdictions in Europe’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 509Google Scholar
Garnier, E (2010) The Law Officers – Speech to the Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/speeches/speech-to-the-constitutional-and-administrative-law-bar-associationGoogle Scholar
Garnier, E (2017) ‘Parliament Is Sovereign but It Must Still Listen to the Law: The Law Officers Have a Vital Role to Play in Reminding MPs to Respect the Judiciary and the Rule of Law’ The Times (18 May 2017)Google Scholar
Garrett, E (1999) ‘Legal Scholarship in an Age of Legislation’ (1999) 34 Tulsa Law Journal 679Google Scholar
Garrett, E & Vermeule, A (2001) ‘Institutional Design of a Thayerian Congress’ (2001) 50 Duke Law Journal 1277Google Scholar
Garton Ash, T (2016) Free Speech: Ten Principles for a Connected World (Atlantic Books)Google Scholar
Gaudreault-Desbiens, J (2014) ‘Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty’ (2014) 23 Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 1Google Scholar
Gavison, R (1999) ‘The Role of Courts in Rifted Democracies’ (1999) 33 Israel Law Review 216Google Scholar
Gearty, C (2002) ‘Reconciling Parliamentary Democracy and Human Rights’ (2002) 118 Law Quarterly Review 248Google Scholar
Gearty, C (2004) Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gearty, C (2005) ‘11 September 2001, Counter-Terrorism and the Human Rights Act’ (2005) 32 Journal of Law and Society 18Google Scholar
Gearty, C (2006) Can Human Rights Survive? (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gearty, C (2010) ‘The Human Rights Act: An Academic Sceptic Changes His Mind but Not His Heart’ (2010) 6 European Human Rights Law Review 582Google Scholar
Gearty, C (2016) On Fantasy Island: Britain, Europe, and Human Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gee, G (2008) ‘The Political Constitutionalism of JAG Griffith’ (2008) 28 Legal Studies 20Google Scholar
Gee, G et al. (2015) The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK’s Changing Constitution (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gee, G (2019) ‘The Political Constitution and the Political Right’ (2019) 30 King’s Law Journal 148Google Scholar
Gee, G & Webber, G (2010) ‘What Is a Political Constitution?’ (2010) 30 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 273Google Scholar
Gee, G & Webber, G (2013) ‘A Grammar of Public Law’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 2137Google Scholar
Geiringer, C (2008) ‘The Principle of Legality and the Bill of Rights Act: A Critical Examination of R v Hansen’ (2008) 6 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 59Google Scholar
Geiringer, C (2009) ‘On a Road to Nowhere: Implied Declarations of Inconsistency and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act’ (2009) 40 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 613Google Scholar
Geiringer, C (2017a) ‘Book Review: Scott Stephenson: From Dialogue to Disagreement in Comparative Rights Constitutionalism’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1247Google Scholar
Geiringer, C (2017b) ‘The Constitutional Role of the Courts under the New Zealand Bill of Rights: Three Narratives from Attorney-General v Taylor’ (2017) 48 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 547Google Scholar
Geiringer, C (2018) ‘Moving beyond the Constitutionalism/Democracy Dilemma: “Commonwealth Model” Scholarship and the Fixation on Legislative Compliance’ in Elliott, , Varuhas, & Stark, (eds.) The Unity of Public Law? Doctrinal, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (Bloomsbury)Google Scholar
Geiringer, C (2019) ‘A New Commonwealth Constitutionalism?’ in Masterman, & Schütze, (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gerards, J (2011) ‘Pluralism, Deference, and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’ (2011) 17 European Law Journal 80Google Scholar
Gerards, J (2014) ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the National Courts: Giving Shape to the Notion of “Shared Responsibility”’ in Gerards, & Fleurin, (eds.) Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Judgments of the ECtHR in National Case-Law: A Comparative Analysis (Intersentia)Google Scholar
Gerards, J (2017) ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: A Typology’ in Gerards, & Brems, (eds.) Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gerards, J & Brems, E (2017) ‘Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases: Introduction’ in Gerards, & Brems, (eds.) Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gerken, H (2014) ‘The Loyal Opposition’ (2014) 123 Yale Law Journal 1958Google Scholar
Geyh, C (2006) When Courts and Congress Collide (University of Michigan Press)Google Scholar
Gies, L (2015a) Mediating Human Rights: Culture, Media and Human Rights (Routledge)Google Scholar
Gies, L (2015b) ‘Human Rights, the British Press and the Deserving Claimant’ in Ziegler, , Wicks, & Hodson, (eds.) The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship? (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Ginsburg, RB (1992) ‘Speaking in a Judicial Voice’ (1992) 67 New York University Law Review 1185Google Scholar
Ginsburg, RB (2010) ‘The Role of Dissenting Opinions’ (2010) 95 Minnesota Law Review 1Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T & Huq, A (2016) Assessing Constitutional Performance (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T & Huq, A (2018) How to Save a Constitutional Democracy (Chicago University Press)Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T & Kagan, R (2005) ‘Institutional Approaches to Courts as Political Actors’ in Ginsburg, & Kagan, (eds.) Institutions and Public Law: Comparative Approaches (Peter Lang)Google Scholar
Giordano, C (2022) ‘“Truly Shameless”: Covid Bereaved Families Say Boris Johnson “Took Us All for Mugs” after Lockdown Party Fine’ The Independent (12 April 2022).Google Scholar
Gledhill, K (2015) The Human Rights Acts: The Mechanisms Compared (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Gleeson, M (2009) ‘The Meaning of Legislation: Context, Purpose and Respect for Fundamental Rights’ (2009) 20 Public Law Review 26Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J & Levinson, D (2009) ‘Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law’ (2009) 122 Harvard Law Review 1791Google Scholar
Goldsmith, P (2001) ‘13th Tom Sargent Memorial Lecture: Politics, Public Interest and Prosecutions – A View by the Attorney General’ London. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20090902161810/http://www.attorneygeneral.gov.uk/attachments/TOM%20SARGENT.docGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, J (1999) The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J (2003a) ‘Homogenizing Constitutions’ (2003) 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 483Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J (2003b) ‘Judicial Review, Legislative Override, and Democracy’ (2003) 38 Wake Forest Law Review 451Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J (2010) Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J (2017) ‘The Principle of Legality and Legislative Intention’ in Meagher, & Groves, (eds.) The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand (The Federation Press)Google Scholar
Goold, B & Lazarus, L, eds. (2007) Security and Human Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Gordon, M (2022) ‘The Prime Minister, the Parties, and the Ministerial Code’ UK Constitutional Law Association blogpost (27 April 2022). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2022/04/27/mike-gordon-the-prime-minister-the-parties-and-the-ministerial-code/Google Scholar
Graber, M (1993) ‘The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary’ (1993) 7 Studies in American Political Development 35Google Scholar
Graber, M (2002) ‘Constitutional Politics and Constitutional Theory: A Misunderstood and Neglected Relationship’ (2002) 27 Law and Social Inquiry 309Google Scholar
Graber, M (2004) ‘Resolving Political Questions into Judicial Questions: Tocqueville’s Thesis Revisited’ (2004) 21 Constitutional Commentary 485Google Scholar
Graber, M, Levinson, S & Tushnet, M, eds. (2018a) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Graber, M, Levinson, S & Tushnet, M (2018b) ‘Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? Introduction’ in Graber, , Levinson, & Tushnet, (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Graham, J (2022) ‘At Last the Curtain Falls on Boris Johnson: The Pantomime Prime Minister Utterly Lacking in Character’ The Guardian (5 September 2022). Available at: –www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/05/curtain-falls-boris-johnson-pantomime-prime-ministerGoogle Scholar
Green, L (1986) ‘Book Review: Law’s Rule – The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology, by A.C. Hutchinson and P. Monahan (eds)’ (1986) 24 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1023Google Scholar
Green, L (2007) ‘The Duty to Govern’ (2007) 13 Legal Theory 165Google Scholar
Green, L (2012) ‘Introduction’ in Hart, (ed.) The Concept of Law 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Green, L (2014) ‘The Democratic Constitution’, unpublished paper on file with authorGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, D (2011) Laying Down the Law: A Discussion of the People, Processes and Problems That Shape Acts of Parliament (Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar
Greene, J (2018) ‘Trump as a Constitutional Failure’ (2018) 93 Indiana Law Journal 93Google Scholar
Greenhouse, L (1995) ‘Justices Rule That Congress Overstepped Bounds: Scalia and Breyer Trade Quotes from “Mending Wall”’ New York Times (19 April 1995)Google Scholar
Greschner, D (2000) ‘The Supreme Court, Federalism and the Metaphors of Moderation’ (2000) 79 Canadian Bar Review 47Google Scholar
Grierson, J & Taylor, D (2020) ‘Home Office Wrong to Refer to “Activist Lawyers”, Top Official Admits’ The Guardian (27 August 2020). Available at: www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/aug/27/home-office-wrong-to-refer-to-activist-lawyers-top-official-admitsGoogle Scholar
Grieve, D (2012a) ‘Politicians and Judges: Speech Given to BPP Law School’ Counsel Magazine (October 2012)Google Scholar
Grieve, D (2012b) ‘The Role of Human Rights in a Law Officer’s Work: Challenges Facing the HRA and the ECHR’ (2012) 17 Judicial Review 101Google Scholar
Grieve, D (2015) The Role of the Attorney General. Ministers Reflect Archive. Riddell, P, Institute for Government. Available at: www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/ministers-reflect/person/dominic-grieve/Google Scholar
Griffith, J (1979) ‘The Political Constitution’ (1979) 42 Modern Law Review 1Google Scholar
Griffith, J (1985) ‘Foreword’ in Gelfand, , Loughlin, & Young, (eds.) Half a Century of Municipal Decline: 1935–1985 (Routledge)Google Scholar
Griffith, J (1997) ‘Judges and the Constitution’ in Rawlings, (ed.) Law, Society, and Economy: Centenary Essays for the London School of Economics and Political Science 1895–1995 (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Griffith, J (2001) ‘The Common Law and the Political Constitution’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review 42Google Scholar
Griffith, J, Ryle, M & Wheeler-Booth, M (1989) Parliament: Functions, Practice and Procedures (Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar
Grimm, D (2007) ‘Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence’ (2007) 57 University of Toronto Law Journal 383Google Scholar
Gross, P (2016) ‘The Judicial Role Today’ Queen Mary University, Law and Society Lecture (23 November 2016). Available at: www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/speech-by-gross-lj-the-judicial-rle-today.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gross, P (2018) ‘How Can Judges Strengthen the Rule of Law?’ Speech given in Argentina (October 2018). Available at: www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/speech-by-lj-gross-J20-conference-sept18.pdfGoogle Scholar
Groves, M & Meagher, D (2017) ‘The Principle of Legality in Australian and New Zealand Law – Final Observations’ in Meagher, & Groves, (eds.) The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand (The Federation Press)Google Scholar
Gutmann, A & Thompson, D (2014) The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands it and Campaigning Undermines it updated ed. (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Guzman, A (2008) How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gwyn, W (1965) The Meaning of the Separation of Powers (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
Gwyn, W (1989) ‘The Indeterminacy of the Separation of Powers in the Age of the Framers’ (1989) 30 William and Mary Law Review 263Google Scholar
Gyorfi, T (2016) Against the New Constitutionalism (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Hailbronner, M (2016) ‘Constitutional Legitimacy and the Separation of Powers: Looking Forward’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Hailbronner, M (2020) ‘Political Process Review: Beyond Distrust’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1458Google Scholar
Hailsham, L (1976) ‘Elective Dictatorship’ 1976 The Listener 496Google Scholar
Halberstam, D (2004) ‘Of Power and Responsibility: The Political Morality of Federal Systems’ (2004) 90 Virginia Law Review 731Google Scholar
Halberstam, D (2009) ‘Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States’ in Dunoff, & Trachtman, (eds.) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Hale, B (2012) ‘Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme?’ (2012) 12 Human Rights Law Review 65Google Scholar
Hale, B (2013) ‘What’s the Point of Human Rights?’ (Warwick Law Lecture 2013, University of Warwick), available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-131128.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A (1788) The Federalist Papers (US Library of Congress), available at: https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-textGoogle Scholar
Hampshire, S (2000) Justice Is Conflict (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Hardman, H (2020) ‘In the Name of Parliamentary Sovereignty: Conflict between the UK Government and the Courts over Judicial Deference in the Case of Prisoner Voting Rights’ (2020) 15 British Politics 226Google Scholar
Harel, A (2014) Why Law Matters (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Harlow, C (2016) ‘The Human Rights Act and “Coordinate Construction”: Towards a “Parliament Square” Axis for Human Rights?’ in Barber, , Ekins, , & Yowell, (eds.) Lord Sumption and the Limits of the Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Harlow, C & Rawlings, R (1992) Pressure through Law (Routledge)Google Scholar
Harlow, C & Rawlings, R (2016) ‘“Striking Back” and “Clamping Down”: An Alternative Perspective on Judicial Review’ in Bell, et al. (eds) Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Harlow, C & Rawlings, R (2021) Law and Administration 4th ed. (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Hart, HLA (2012) The Concept of Law 3rd ed. (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Harvey, P (2015) ‘Third Party Interventions before the ECtHR: A Rough Guide’ (28 January 2015). Available at: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2015/02/24/third-party-interventions-before-the-ecthr-a-rough-guide/Google Scholar
Hay, C (2007) Why We Hate Politics (Polity)Google Scholar
Hay, C & Richards, D (2000) ‘The Tangled Web of Westminster and Whitehall: The Discourse, Strategy and Practice of Networking within the British Core Executive’ (2000) 78 Public Administration 1Google Scholar
Hayward, A (2019) ‘Equal Civil Partnerships, Discrimination and the Indulgence of Time: R (Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development’ (2019) 82 Modern Law Review 922Google Scholar
Hazarika, A & Hamilton, T (2018) Punch and Judy Politics: An Insiders’ Guide to Prime Minister’s Questions (Biteback Publishing)Google Scholar
Hazell, R (2004) ‘Who Is the Guardian of Legal Values in the Legislative Process: Parliament or the Executive?’ [2004] Public Law 495Google Scholar
Hazell, R (2015) ‘The United Kingdom’ in Galligan, & Brenton, (eds.) Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems: Controversies, Changes and Challenges (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Heard, A (1991) Canadian Constitutional Conventions: The Marriage of Law and Politics (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Heard, A (2012) ‘Constitutional Conventions: The Heart of the Living Constitution’ (2012) 6 Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law 319Google Scholar
Heclo, H (1975) ‘OMB and the Presidency – The Problem of “Neutral Competence”’ (1975) 38 The Public Interest 80.Google Scholar
Heclo, H (2000) ‘Campaigning and Governing: A Conspectus’ in Ornstein, & Mann, (eds.) The Permanent Campaign and Its Future (American Enterprise Institute)Google Scholar
Heclo, H (2006) ‘Thinking Institutionally’ in Rhodes, , Binder, & Rockman, (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Heclo, H (2008) On Thinking Institutionally (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Heise, M (2000) ‘Preliminary Thoughts on the Virtues of Passive Dialogue’ (2000) 34 Akron Law Review 73Google Scholar
Hennessy, P (1995) The Hidden Wiring: Unearthing the British Constitution (Indigo)Google Scholar
Herz, M (2009) ‘Some Thoughts on Judicial Review and Collaborative Governance’ 2009 Journal of Dispute Resolution 361Google Scholar
Heun, W (2011) The Constitution of Germany: A Contextual Analysis (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Heydon, J (2014) ‘Are Bills of Rights Necessary in Common Law Systems?’ (2014) 130 Law Quarterly Review 392Google Scholar
Hickford, M (2013) ‘The Historical, Political Constitution – Some Reflections on Political Constitutionalism in New Zealand’s History and its Possible Normative Value’ 2013 New Zealand Law Review 585Google Scholar
Hickman, T (2005a) ‘Constitutional Dialogue, Constitutional Theories and the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2005] Public Law 306Google Scholar
Hickman, T (2005b) ‘In Defence of the Legal Constitution’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 981Google Scholar
Hickman, T (2008) ‘The Courts and Politics after the Human Rights Act: A Comment’ [2008] Public Law 84Google Scholar
Hickman, T (2010) Public Law after the Human Rights Act (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Hickman, T (2015) ‘Bill of Rights Reform and the Case for Going beyond the Declaration of Incompatibility Model’ [2015] New Zealand Law Review 35Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2002) Charter Conflicts: What Is Parliament’s Role? (McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2004a) ‘Is It Too Late to Rehabilitate Canada’s Notwithstanding Clause?’ in Huscroft, & Brodie, (eds.) Constitutionalism in the Charter Era (Lexis-Nexis)Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2004b) ‘New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights?’ (2004) 82 Texas Law Review 1963Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2006) ‘Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR Help Facilitate a Culture of Rights?’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2009) ‘Compromise and the Notwithstanding Clause: Why the Dominant Narrative Distorts our Understanding’ in Kelly, & Manfredi, (eds.) The Charter at 25 (University of British Columbia Press)Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2010) ‘Compromise and the Notwithstanding Clause: Why the Dominant Narrative Distorts Our Understanding’ in Kelly, & Manfredi, (eds.) Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (UBC Press)Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2011) ‘Governing Like Judges?’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2012) ‘Governing under the Human Rights Act: The Limitations of Wishful Thinking’ [2012] Public Law 27Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2015) ‘Legislative Rights Review: Addressing the Gap between Ideals and Constraints’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Hiebert, J (2017) ‘The Notwithstanding Clause: Why Non-Use Does Not Necessarily Equate with Abiding by Judicial Norms’ in Oliver, , Macklem, & Des Rosiers, (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Hiebert, J & Kelly, J (2015) Parliamentary Bills of Rights: The Experiences of New Zealand and the United Kingdom (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Hilbink, L (2006) ‘Beyond Manicheanism: Assessing the New Constitutionalism’ (2006) 65 Maryland Law Review 15Google Scholar
Hilbink, L (2008) ‘Assessing the New Constitutionalism’ (2008) 40 Comparative Politics 227Google Scholar
Hilbink, L (2009) ‘The Constituted Nature of Constituents’ Interests: Historical and Ideational Factors in Judicial Empowerment’ (2009) 62 Political Research Quarterly 781Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, C (2014) Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Hills, D (2012) ‘Metaphor’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Winter ed.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R (2004) Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Hirschl, R (2011) ‘The Nordic Counternarrative: Democracy, Human Development, and Judicial Review’ (2011) 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 449Google Scholar
Hodge, P (2015) ‘Judicial Law-Making in a Changing Constitution’ (2015) 26 Stellenbosch Law Review 471Google Scholar
Hodge, P (2016) ‘Upholding the Rule of Law: How We Preserve Judicial Independence in the United Kingdom’ Speech given to the Lincoln’s Inn Denning Society (7 November 2016). Available at: www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-161107.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hodge, P (2018) Preserving Judicial Independence in an Age of Populism Speech at the North Strathclyde Sheriffdom Conference, Paisley, available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-181123.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, L (1999a) ‘The Influence of the European Principle of Proportionality upon UK Law’ in Ellis, (ed.) The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Hart)Google Scholar
Hoffmann, L (1999b) ‘Human Rights and the House of Lords’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 159Google Scholar
Hogan, G, Kenny, D & Walsh, R (2015) ‘An Anthology of Declarations of Unconstitutionality’ (2015) 54 Irish Jurist 1Google Scholar
Hogarth, R (2020) ‘The Internal Market Bill Breaks International Law and Lays the Ground to Break more Law’ Institute for Government post (9 September 2020). Available at: www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/internal-market-bill-breaks-international-lawGoogle Scholar
Hogg, P (2004) ‘Discovering Dialogue’ in Huscroft, & Brodie, (eds.) Constitutionalism in the Charter Era (Butterworths)Google Scholar
Hogg, P (2007) Constitutional Law of Canada 5th ed. (Carswell)Google Scholar
Hogg, P & Amarnath, R (2017) ‘Understanding Dialogue Theory’ in Oliver, , Macklem, & Des Rosiers, (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Hogg, P & Bushell, A (1997) ‘The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (or Perhaps the Charter Of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing After All)’ (1997) 35 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 75Google Scholar
Hogg, P, Thornton, A & Wright, WK (2007a) ‘Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or “Much Ado About Metaphors”’ (2007) 45 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Hogg, P, Thornton, A & Wright, WK (2007b) ‘A Reply on “Charter Dialogue Revisited”’ (2007) 45 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 193Google Scholar
Holland, A (2016) ‘Forbearance’ (2016) 110 American Political Science Review 232Google Scholar
Holmes, S (2018) ‘How Democracies Perish’ in Sunstein, (ed.) Can it Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America (Harper Collins)Google Scholar
Hood Phillips, O (1966) ‘Constitutional Conventions: Dicey’s Predecessors’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Review 137Google Scholar
Hood Phillips, O (1978) Constitutional and Administrative Law (Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar
Hope, D (2009) ‘The Judges’ Dilemma’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 753Google Scholar
Horder, J (2006) ‘Moral Arguments in Interpreting Statutes’ in Endicott, , Getzler, & Peel, (eds.) Properties of Law: Essays in Honour of Jim Harris (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Horne, A & Walker, C (2014) ‘Lessons Learned from Political Constitutionalism? Comparing the Enactment of Control Orders and Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures by the UK Parliament’ 2014 Public Law 267Google Scholar
Howarth, D (2016) ‘On Parliamentary Silence’ (13 December 2016). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2016/12/13/david-howarth-on-parliamentary-silenceGoogle Scholar
Huhne, C (2009) ‘Cleaning up the House’ The Guardian (27 January 2009). Available at: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/jan/27/lords-labourGoogle Scholar
Hunt, M (1997) Using Human Rights Law in English Courts (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Hunt, M (2003) ‘Sovereignty’s Blight: Why Contemporary Public Law Needs a Doctrine of “Due Deference”’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Hunt, M (2007) ‘Reshaping Constitutionalism’ in Morison, , McEvoy, & Anthony, (eds.) Judges, Transition, and Human Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Hunt, M (2009) ‘Against Bifurcation’ in Dyzenhaus, , Hunt, & Huscroft, (eds.) A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Hunt, M (2010) ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act on the Legislature: A Diminution of Democracy or a New Voice for Parliament?’ (2010) 6 European Human Rights Law Review 601Google Scholar
Hunt, M (2013) ‘The Joint Committee on Human Rights’ in Horne, , Drewry, & Oliver, (eds.) Parliament and the Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Hunt, M (2015) ‘Introduction’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Hunt, M (2021) The Independent Human Rights Act Review: Response to the Call for Evidence. Available at: www.gov.uk/guidance/independent-human-rights-act-review#call-for-evidence-responsesGoogle Scholar
Hunt, M, Hooper, H & Yowell, P (2012) Parliament and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Arts and Humanities Research Council)Google Scholar
Hunt, M, Hooper, H & Yowell, P, eds. (2015) Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Huq, A (2012) ‘Binding the Executive by Law or by Politics?’ (2012) 79 University of Chicago Law Review 777Google Scholar
Huq, A (2018) ‘Legal or Political Checks on Apex Criminality: An Essay on Constitutional Design’ (2018) 65 UCLA Law Review 1506Google Scholar
Huq, A & Michaels, J (2016) ‘The Cycles of Separation-of-Powers Jurisprudence’ (2016) 126 Yale Law Journal 342Google Scholar
Huscroft, G (2007) ‘Constitutionalism from the Top Down’ (2007) 45 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 91Google Scholar
Huscroft, G (2009) ‘Rationalising Judicial Power: The Mischief of Dialogue Theory’ in Kelly, & Manfredi, (eds.) Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (UBC Press)Google Scholar
Huscroft, G, Miller, B & Webber, G, eds. (2014) Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Hutchins, A (2018) ‘Why Doug Ford Went Straight to the Nuclear Option on Toronto City Council’ Macleans (10 September 2018)Google Scholar
Hutchinson, A (2008) ‘In the Public Interest: The Responsibilities and Rights of Government Lawyers’ (2008) 46 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 105Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M (2013a) ‘Enemies vs. Adversaries’ New York Times (16 October 2013)Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M (2013b) Fire and Ashes: Success and Failure in Politics (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Ip, J (2013) ‘Sunset Clauses and Counterterrorism Legislation’ [2013] Public Law 74Google Scholar
Ip, J (2020) ‘Attorney-General v Taylor: A Constitutional Milestone?’ [2020] New Zealand Law Review 35Google Scholar
Irvine, D (2003a) Human Rights, Constitutional Law and the Development of the English Legal System (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Irvine, D (2003b) ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act: Parliament, the Courts and the Executive’ [2003] Public Law 308Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S (2015) Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S (2018) ‘Populism versus Democratic Governance’ in Graber, , Levinson, & Tushnet, (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S (2020) ‘The Corruption of Popular Sovereignty’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1109Google Scholar
Jack, M, ed. (2011) Erskine May’s Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament 24th ed. (Lexis Nexis)Google Scholar
Jackson, V (2015) ‘Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality’ (2015) 124 Yale Law Journal 3094Google Scholar
Jackson, V (2016) ‘Pro-Constitutional Representation: Comparing the Role Obligations of Judges and Elected Representatives in Constitutional Democracy’ (2016) 57 William and Mary Law Review 1717Google Scholar
Jackson, V (2020) ‘Pro-Constitutional Representation and Legislated Rights’ (2020) 21 Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 77Google Scholar
Jackson, V (2021) ‘Knowledge Institutions in Constitutional Democracies: Preliminary Reflections’ (2021) 7 Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law 156Google Scholar
Jacobi, T (2006) ‘The Impact of Positive Political Theory on Old Questions of Constitutional Law and the Separation of Powers’ (2006) 100 Northwestern University Law Review 259Google Scholar
Jaconelli, J (1999) ‘The Nature of Constitutional Convention’ (1999) 19 Legal Studies 24Google Scholar
Jaconelli, J (2005) ‘Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?’ (2005) 64 Cambridge Law Journal 149Google Scholar
Jaffe, L (1969) English and American Judges as Lawmakers (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Jai, J (1996) ‘Policy, Politics and Law: Changing Relationships in Light of the Charter’ (1996) 9 National Journal of Constitutional law 1Google Scholar
Jenkins, S (2006) ‘This House of Commons is God’s Gift to Dictatorship’ The Guardian (1 November 2006). Available at: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/nov/01/comment.politics1Google Scholar
Jennings, I (1959) The Law and the Constitution 5th ed. (University of London Press)Google Scholar
Jennings, I (1971) The British Constitution (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Jhaveri, S (2022) ‘Towards a Theory of Executive Constitutionalism’ [2022] Public Law 562Google Scholar
Johansen, D & Rosen, P (2012) The Notwithstanding Clause of the Canadian Charter (Law and Government Division) Parliamentary Background PaperGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N (2007) ‘Opposition in the British Political System’ (2007) 32 Government & Opposition 487Google Scholar
Johnston, N & Brown, J (2023) ‘Prisoner’s Voting Rights’, House of Commons Library Research Briefing, 20 January 2023Google Scholar
Joseph, P (2004) ‘Parliament, the Courts, and the Collaborative Enterprise’ (2004) 15 King’s Law Journal 321Google Scholar
Joseph, P (2017) ‘The Principle of Legality: Constitutional Innovation’ in Meagher, & Groves, (eds.) The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand (The Federation Press)Google Scholar
Jowell, J (2003) ‘Judicial Deference: Servility, Civility, or Institutional Capacity?’ [2003] Public Law 592Google Scholar
Jowell, J (2006) ‘Politics and the Law: Constitutional Balance or Institutional Confusion’ (The Law Society, London) JUSTICE Tom Sargent Memorial Annual LectureGoogle Scholar
Judge, I (2015) The Safest Shield: Lectures, Speeches and Essays (Bloomsbury)Google Scholar
Kahana, T (2001) ‘The Notwithstanding Mechanism and Public Discussion: Lessons from the Ignored Practice of Section 33 of the Charter’ (2001) 44 Canadian Public Administration 255Google Scholar
Kahana, T (2002) ‘Understanding the Notwithstanding Mechanism’ (2002) 52 University of Toronto Law Journal 221Google Scholar
Kalitowski, S (2008) ‘Rubber Stamp or Cockpit? The Impact of Parliament on Government Legislation’ (2008) 61 Parliamentary Affairs 694Google Scholar
Kanetake, M & Nollkaemper, A, eds. (2016) The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestation and Deference (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Kateb, G (1981) ‘The Moral Distinctiveness of Representative Democracy’ (1981) 91 Ethics 357Google Scholar
Katyal, N (1998) ‘Judges as Advicegivers’ (1998) 50 Stanford Law Review 1708Google Scholar
Katyal, N (2006) ‘Internal Separation of Powers: Checking Today’s Most Dangerous Branch from Within’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal 2314Google Scholar
Katzmann, R (1988) ‘Introduction’ in Katzmann, (ed.) Judges and Legislators: Toward Institutional Comity (Brookings)Google Scholar
Kaufman, G (1997) How to Be a Minister (Faber & Faber)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2003a) ‘The Idea of a Living Constitution’ (2003) 16 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 55Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2003b) ‘Participation and Judicial Review: A Reply to Jeremy Waldron’ (2003) 22 Law and Philosophy 451Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2004) ‘The Elusive Divide between Interpretation and Legislation under the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 259Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2005) ‘Unlocking the Human Rights Act: The “Radical” Approach to Section 3(1) Revisited’ [2005] European Human Rights Law Review 260Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2007) ‘Choosing between Section 3 and 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998: judicial reasoning after Ghaidan v. Mendoza’ in Fenwick, , Phillipson, & Masterman, (eds.) Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2008) ‘Deference or Defiance? The Limits of the Judicial Role in Constitutional Adjudication’ in Huscroft, (ed.) Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2009a) Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2009b) ‘Constitutional Review, the Courts, and Democratic Scepticism’ (2009) 62 Current Legal Problems 102Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2009c) ‘Judging the Judges under the Human Rights Act: Deference, Disillusionment and the “War on Terror”’ [2009] Public Law 287Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2010a) ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’ (2010) 126 Law Quarterly Review 222Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2010b) ‘Judicial Restraint in the Pursuit of Justice’ (2010) 60 University of Toronto Law Journal 23Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2010c) ‘Special Advocates, Control Orders and the Right to a Fair Trial’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 836Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2011) ‘Constitutionalism, Counterterrorism, and the Courts: Changes in the British Constitutional Landscape’ (2011) 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 172Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2014) ‘Proportionality and Parliamentary Debates: Exploring Some Forbidden Territory’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 443Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2015a) ‘A Hard Look at the Last Word’ (2015) 35 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 825Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2015b) ‘The Joint Committee on Human Rights: A Hybrid Breed of Constitutional Watchdog’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights (Hart publishing)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2015c) ‘What’s So Weak about Weak-Form Review? The Case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998’ (2016) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1008Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2015d) ‘What’s so Weak about Weak-Form Review? A Rejoinder to Stephen Gardbaum’ (2016) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1049Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2016a) ‘The Lure and the Limits of Dialogue’ (2016) 66 University of Toronto Law Journal 83Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2016b) ‘The Constitutional Separation of Powers’ in Dyzenhaus, & Thorburn, (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2016c) ‘The Role of Courts in the Joint Enterprise of Governing’ in Barber, , Ekins, & Yowell, (eds.) Lord Sumption and the Limits of the Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2017) ‘Article Review: Aileen Kavanagh on Neil Duxbury’s Judicial Disapproval as a Constitutional Technique’ I-CONnect blogpost (November 2017). Available at: www.iconnectblog.com/2017/11/article-review-aileen-kavanagh-on-neil-duxburys-judicial-disapproval-as-a-constitutional-technique/Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2019) ‘Recasting the Political Constitution: From Rivals to Relationships’ (2019) 30 King’s Law Journal 43Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2020) ‘Comparative Political Process Theory’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1483Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2022) ‘Towards a Relational Understanding of the Separation of Powers’ [2022] Public Law 535Google Scholar
Keir, D & Lawson, F (1979) Cases in Constitutional Law 6th ed. (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Kelly, J (2005) Governing with the Charter (UBC Press)Google Scholar
Kelly, J (2020) ‘Legislative Capacity and Human Rights in the Age of Populism: Two Challenges for Legislated Rights’ (2020) 21 Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 94Google Scholar
Kelly, J & Hennigar, M (2012) ‘The Canadian Charter of Rights and the Minister of Justice: Weak-form review within a constitutional Charter of Rights’ (2012) 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 35Google Scholar
Kelly, R & Maer, L (2016) ‘Parliamentary Reform and the Accountability of Government to the House of Commons’ in Horne, & Le Sueur, (eds.) Parliament: Legislation and Accountabiliity (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Kennon, A (2013) ‘Legal Advice to Parliament’ in Horne, , Drewry, & Oliver, (eds.) Parliament and the Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Kenny, D & Casey, C (2020) ‘Shadow Constitutional Review: The Dark Side of Pre-Enactment Political Review in Ireland and Japan’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 51Google Scholar
Keohane, R (2005) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Khaitan, T (2021) ‘Guarantor Institutions’ (2021) 16 Asian Journal of Comparative Law 40Google Scholar
Khosla, M (2010) ‘Making Social Rights Conditional: Lessons from India’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 739Google Scholar
Kildea, P (2020) ‘The Constitutional Role of Electoral Management Bodies: The Case of the Australian Electoral Commission’ (2020) 48 Federal Law Review 1Google Scholar
King, A (1997) Running Scared: Why America’s Politicians Campaign Too Much and Govern Too Little (Free Press)Google Scholar
King, A & Crewe, I (2013) The Blunders of Our Governments (Oneworld)Google Scholar
King, J (2007) ‘The Justiciability of Resource Allocation’ (2007) 70 Modern Law Review 197Google Scholar
King, J (2008a) ‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint’ (2008) 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 409Google Scholar
King, J (2008b) ‘The Pervasiveness of Polycentricity’ [2008] Public Law 101Google Scholar
King, J (2012) Judging Social Rights (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
King, J (2013) ‘The Instrumental Value of Legal Accountability’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
King, J (2015a) ‘Parliament’s Role following Declarations of Incompatibility under the Human Rights Act’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
King, J (2015b) ‘Rights and the Rule of Law in Third Way Constitutionalism’ (2015) 30 Constitutional Commentary 101Google Scholar
King, J (2019a) ‘Dialogue, Finality and Legality’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
King, J (2019b) ‘The Democratic Case for a Written Constitution’ (2019) 72 Current Legal Problems 1Google Scholar
King, J (2021) Submission to the Independent Human Rights Act Review. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1040525/ihrar-final-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
King, ML (2000 [1964]) Why We Can’t Wait (Signet)Google Scholar
Kingreen, T & Poscher, R (2018) Grundrechte Staatsrecht II 34th ed. (CF Müller)Google Scholar
Kinley, D (2015) ‘Finding and Filling the Democratic Deficit in Human Rights’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Klein, A (2008) ‘Judging as Nudging: New Governance Approaches for the Enforcement of Constitution Social and Economic Rights’ (2008) 39 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 351Google Scholar
Klug, F (1999) ‘The Human Rights Act 1998, Pepper v. Hart and All That’ [1999] Public Law 246Google Scholar
Klug, F (2001) ‘The Human Rights Act – a “Third Way” or “Third Wave” Bill of Rights’ [2001] European Human Rights Law Review 361Google Scholar
Klug, F (2003) ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2003] European Human Rights Law Review 125Google Scholar
Klug, F (2005) ‘The Long Road to Human Rights Compliance’ (2005) 57 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 186Google Scholar
Klug, F (2006) Report on the Working Practices of the JCHR (Joint Committee on Human Rights)Google Scholar
Klug, F (2007) ‘A Bill of Rights: Do We Need One or Do We Already Have One?’ [2007] Public Law 701Google Scholar
Klug, F & Starmer, K (2005) ‘Standing Back from the Human Rights Act: How Effective Is It Five Years On?’ [2005] Public Law 716Google Scholar
Klug, F & Wildbore, H (2007) ‘Breaking New Ground: The Joint Committee on Human Rights and the Role of Parliament in Human Rights Compliance’ [2007] European Human Rights Law Review 231Google Scholar
Koh, H (1997) ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law’ (1997) 106 Yale Law Journal 2599Google Scholar
Komesar, N (1984) ‘Taking Institutions Seriously: Introduction to a Strategy for Constitutional Analysis’ (1984) 51 University of Chicago Law Review 366Google Scholar
Komesar, N (1988) ‘A Job for the Judges: The Judiciary and the Constitution in a Massive and Complex Society’ (1988) 86 Michigan Law Review 657Google Scholar
Komesar, N (1994) Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics, and Public Policy (University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M (2006) ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about Law and Globalisation’ (2006) 8 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9Google Scholar
Kramer, L (2000) ‘Putting the Politics Back into the Political Safeguards of Federalism’ (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 215Google Scholar
Kreppel, A (2014) ‘Typologies and Classifications’ in Martin, , Saalfeld, & Strom, (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Krisch, N (2008) ‘The Open Architecture of European Human Rights Law’ (2008) 71 Modern Law Review 183Google Scholar
Krisch, N (2010) Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Krisch, N, Corradini, F & Reimers, L (2020) ‘Order at the Margins: The Legal Construction of Interface Norms over Time’ (2020) 9 Global Constitutionalism 343Google Scholar
Krotoszynski, R (1998) ‘Constitutional Flares: On Judges, Legislatures, and Dialogue’ (1988) 83 Minnesota Law Review 1Google Scholar
Kumm, M (2009) ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State’ in Dunoff, & Trachtman, (eds.) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Kumm, M (2010) ‘The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review’ (2010) 4 Law & Ethics of Human Rights 141Google Scholar
Kumm, M (2017) ‘Constitutional Courts and Legislatures: Institutional Terms of Engagement’ (2017) 1 Catolica Law Review 55Google Scholar
Kuo, M-S (2019) ‘Against Instantaneous Democracy’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 554Google Scholar
Kutz, C (2000) ‘Acting Together’ (2000) LXI Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1Google Scholar
Kyriakides, K (2003) ‘The Advisory Functions of the Attorney General’ (2003) 1 Hertfordshire Law Journal 73Google Scholar
Kyritsis, D (2006) ‘Representation and Waldron’s Objection to Judicial Review’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 733Google Scholar
Kyritsis, D (2007) ‘Principles, Policies and the Power of Courts’ (2007) 20 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 379Google Scholar
Kyritsis, D (2008) ‘What is Good about Legal Conventionalism?’ (2008) 14 Legal Theory 135Google Scholar
Kyritsis, D (2012) ‘Constitutional Review in Representative Democracy’ (2012) 32 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 297Google Scholar
Kyritsis, D (2014) ‘Whatever Works: Proportionality as a Constitutional Doctrine’ (2014) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1Google Scholar
Kyritsis, D (2015) Shared Authority: Courts and Legislatures in Legal Theory (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Kyritsis, D (2017) Where Our Protection Lies: Separation of Powers and Constitutional Review (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Kyritsis, D (2020) ‘Justifying Constitutional Review in the Legitimacy Register’ (2020) 40 Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law 1Google Scholar
Kyritsis, D & Lakin, S (2022) ‘The Methodology of Constitutional Theory - Introduction’ in Kyritsis, & Lakin, (eds.) The Methodology of Constitutional Theory (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Kysar, D & Ewing, B (2011) ‘Prods and Pleas: Limited Government in an Era of Unlimited Harm’ (2011) 121 Yale Law Journal 350Google Scholar
Lain, C (2017) ‘Soft Supremacy’ (2017) 58 William & Mary Law Review 1609Google Scholar
Lake, H (2022) ‘Overdoing the Override Clause’ The National (6 September 2022)Google Scholar
Lakoff, G & Johnson, M (2003) Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Landau, D (2014) ‘A Dynamic Theory of Judicial Role’ (2014) 55 Boston College Law Review 1501Google Scholar
Landau, D (2017) ‘Substitute and Complement Theories of Judicial Review’ (2017) 92 Indiana Law Journal 1282Google Scholar
Landau, D (2018) ‘Institutional Failure and Intertemporal Theores of Judicial Role in the Global South’ in Bilchitz, & Landau, (eds.) The Evolution of the Separation of Powers: Between the Global North and the Global South (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Lavapuro, J, Ojanen, T & Scheinin, M (2011) ‘Rights-Based Constitutionalism in Finland and the Development of Pluralist Constitutional Review’ (2011) 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 505Google Scholar
Law, D (2009) ‘A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review’ (2009) 97 Georgetown Law Review 723Google Scholar
Law, D & Chang, W-C (2011) ‘The Limits of Global Judicial Dialogue’ (2011) 86 Washington Law Review 523Google Scholar
Laws, S (2013) ‘Legislation and Politics’ in Feldman, (ed.) Law in Politics, Politics in Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Laws, S (2016) ‘What Is Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation For?’ in Horne, & Le Sueur, (eds.) Parliament: Legislation and Accountability (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Lawson, G (1994) ‘The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State’ (1994) 107 Harvard Law Review 1231Google Scholar
Lawson, G & Seidman, G (2020) Deference: The Legal Concept and the Legal Practice (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Lazarus, L & Simonsen, N (2015) ‘Judicial Review and Parliamentary Debate: Enriching the Doctrine of Due Deference’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Le Divellec, A (2007) ‘Cabinet as the Leading Part of Parliament’ in Ziegler, , Baranger, & Bradley, (eds.) Constitutionalism and the Role of Parliaments (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Le Sueur, A (1996) ‘The Judicial Review Debate: From Partnership to Friction’ (1996) 31 Government & Opposition 8Google Scholar
Le Sueur, A & Caird, J (2013) ‘The House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution’ in Horne, , Drewry, & Oliver, (eds.) Parliament and the Law 1st ed. (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Leckey, R (2015) Bills of Rights in the Common Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Leckey, R (2016) ‘Enforcing Laws That Infringe Rights’ [2016] Public Law 206Google Scholar
Leckey, R (2019a) ‘Advocacy Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause’ (2019) 28 Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 1Google Scholar
Leckey, R (2019b) ‘Assisted Dying, Suspended Declarations, and Dialogue’s Time’ (2019) 69 University of Toronto Law Journal 64Google Scholar
Leckey, R & Mendelsohn, E (2022) ‘The Notwithstanding Clause: Legislatures, Courts, and the Electorate’ (2022) 72 University of Toronto Law Journal 189Google Scholar
Lee, J & Lee, S (2015) ‘Humility in the Supreme Court’ (2015) 26 King’s Law Journal 165Google Scholar
Leeson, H (2000) ‘Section 33, the Notwithstanding Clause: A Paper Tiger?’ (2000) 6 IRRP Choices 1Google Scholar
Leeson, H (2001) ‘Section 33, the Notwithstanding Clause: A Paper Tiger?’ in Howe, & Russell, (eds.) Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy (McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar
Legg, A (2012) The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Leigh, I (1999) ‘Secrets of the Political Constitution’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 298Google Scholar
Leigh, I & Lustgarten, L (1999) ‘Making Rights Real: The Courts, Remedies and the Human Rights Act’ (1999) 58 Cambridge Law Journal 509Google Scholar
Leigh, I & Masterman, R (2008) Making Rights Real: The Human Rights Act 1998 in Its First Decade (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Lemmens, K (2012) ‘Comparative Law as an Act of Modesty: A Pragmatic and Realistic Approach to Comparative Legal Scholarship’ in Adams, & Bomhoff, (eds.) Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K (2012) ‘The European Court of Justice and Process-Oriented Review’ (2012) 31 Yearbook of European Law 3Google Scholar
Leslie, I (2022) How to Disagree: Lessons on Productive Conflict at Work and Home (Faber & Faber)Google Scholar
Lester, A (1998) ‘The Art of the Possible – Interpreting Statutes under the Human Rights Act’ [1998] European Human Rights Law Review 663Google Scholar
Lester, A (1999) ‘Interpreting Statutes under the Human Rights Act’ (1999) 20 Statute Law Review 218Google Scholar
Lester, A (2002a) ‘The Magnetism of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2002) 33 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 53Google Scholar
Lester, A (2002b) ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation under the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2002) European Human Rights Law Review 432Google Scholar
Letsas, G (2006) ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 705Google Scholar
Letsas, G (2013) ‘The ECHR as Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy’ in Ulfstein, , Follesdal, & Peters, (eds.) Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Levi, E (1976) ‘Some Aspects of the Separation of Powers’ (1976) 76 Columbia Law Review 371Google Scholar
Levinson, D (1999) ‘Rights Essentialism and Remedial Equilibration’ (1999) 99 Columbia Law Review 857Google Scholar
Levinson, D (2005) ‘Empire-Building Government in Constitutional Law’ (2005) 118 Harvard Law Review 915Google Scholar
Levinson, D (2011) ‘Parchment and Politics: The Positive Puzzle of Constitutional Commitment’ (2011) 124 Harvard Law Review 657Google Scholar
Levinson, S & Balkin, J (2009) ‘Constitutional Crises’ (2009) 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 707Google Scholar
Levitsky, S & Ziblatt, D (2019) How Democracies Die: What History Reveals about Our Future (Penguin)Google Scholar
Levy, J (2019) ‘Departmentalism and Dialogue’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.), Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Lewans, M (2016) Administrative Law and Judicial Deference (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Lewis, T & Cumper, P (2009) ‘Balancing Freedom of Political Expression against Freedom of Political Opportunity’ [2009] Public Law 89Google Scholar
Lieven, N & Kilroy, C (2003) ‘Access to the Court under the Human Rights Act: Standing, Third Party Intervenors and Legal Assistance’ in Jowell, & Cooper, (eds.) Delivering Rights. How the Human Rights Act Is Working (Hart)Google Scholar
Lijphart, A (2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries 2nd ed. (Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Lim, B (2013) ‘The Normativity of the Principle of Legality’ (2013) 37 Melbourne University Law Review 372Google Scholar
Lim, B (2017) ‘The Rationales for the Principle of Legality’ in Meagher, and Groves, (eds.) The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand (Federation Press)Google Scholar
Lin, C (2019) ‘Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Problems in East Asia’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 701Google Scholar
Linde, H (1976) ‘Due Process of Law-Making’ (1976) 55 Nebraska Law Review 197Google Scholar
Loader, I (2007) ‘The Cultural Lives of Security and Rights’ in Goold, & Lazarus, (eds.) Security and Human Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Lougheed, P (1998) ‘Why a Notwithstanding Clause’ (1998) 6 Centre for Constitutional Studies Points of View. Available at: www.constitutionalstudies.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Lougheed.pdfGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M (2003) ‘Constitutional Law: The Third Order of the Political’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Loughlin, M (2006) ‘Towards a Republican Revival’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 425Google Scholar
Loughlin, M (2013) The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Lovell, G (2003) Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Low, S (1904) The Governance of England (T Fisher Unwin)Google Scholar
Luban, D (2007) Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, G (2014) ‘The Principle of Proportionality in the Case-Law of the German Federal Constitutional Court’ (2014) 34 Human Rights Law Journal 12Google Scholar
Luna, E (2000) ‘Constitutional Road Maps’ (2000) 90 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 1125Google Scholar
Lupo, N & Fasone, C (2016) Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
MacDonnell, V (2013) ‘The Constitution as Framework for Governance’ (2013) 63 University of Toronto Law Journal 624Google Scholar
MacDonnell, V (2015) ‘The Civil Servant’s Role in the Implementation of Constitutional Rights’ (2015) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 383Google Scholar
MacDonnell, V (2016) ‘The New Parliamentary Sovereignty’ (2016) 21 Review of Constitutional Studies 13Google Scholar
MacDonnell, V (2019) ‘Rethinking the Invisible Constitution: How Unwritten Constitutional Principles Shape Political Decision-Making’ (2019) 65 McGill Law Journal 176Google Scholar
MacDonnell, V (2023a) ‘Accounting for a Strong Executive in Theories of Rights Interpretation’ Unpublished manuscript, on file with authorGoogle Scholar
MacDonnell, V (2023b) ‘Theorising about the Executive in the Modern State’ Unpublished manuscript, on file with authorGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, E (2012a) ‘Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”’ (2012) 17 Review of Constitutional Studies 73Google Scholar
MacFarlane, E (2012b) ‘Dialogue or Compliance? Measuring Legislatures’ Policy Responses to Court Rulings on Rights’ (2012) 34 International Political Science Review 39Google Scholar
MacFarlane, E (2013) Governing from the Bench: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Judicial Role (UBC Press)Google Scholar
MacFarlane, E (2017) ‘Dialogue, Remedies, and Positive Rights: Carter v. Canada as Microcosm for Past and Future Issues under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ (2017) 49 Ottawa Law Review 107Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A (1967) Secularisation and Moral Change (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
MacNair, D (2005) ‘In the Service of the Crown: Are Ethical Obligations Different for Government Lawyers?’ (2005) 84 Canadian Bar Review 501Google Scholar
Madison, J (1788) The Federalist Papers (US Library of Congress). Available at: https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-textGoogle Scholar
Maduro, MP (2009) ‘Courts and Pluralism: Essay on a Theory of Adjudication in the Context of Legal and Constitutional Pluralism’ in Dunoff, & Trachtman, (eds.) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Magill, E (2000) ‘The Real Separation in Separation of Powers Law’ (2000) 86 Virginia Law Review 1127Google Scholar
Mahoney, P (2015) ‘The Relationship between the Strasbourg Court and the National Courts – As Seen from Strasbourg’ in Ziegler, , Wicks, & Hodson, (eds.) The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship? (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Mailey, R (2019) ‘The Notwithstanding Clause and the New Populism’ (2019) 28 Constitutional Forum 9Google Scholar
Major, J (2022) ‘Boris Johnson’s Government Has Damaged the UK’ BBC News report (10 July 2022). Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-62134391Google Scholar
Malleson, K (2001) ‘A British Bill of Rights: Incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Howe, & Russell, (eds.) Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy (McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar
Malleson, K (2010) ‘The Rehabilitation of the Separation of Powers in the UK’ in de Groot van Leeuwen, & Rombouts, (eds.) Separation of Powers in Theory and Practice: An International Perspective (Wolf Legal Publishers)Google Scholar
Mallory, C & Tyrrell, H (2021) ‘Discretionary Space and Declarations of Incompatibility’ (2021) 32 King’s Law Journal 466Google Scholar
Mance, H (2022) ‘“A Bonfire of the Decencies”: Peter Hennessy on Boris Johnson’s Government’ Financial Times (23 May 2022). Available at: www.ft.com/content/37a5b18a-77d0-4f17-ae0a-99802396ff36Google Scholar
Mance, J (2018) ‘The Frontiers of Executive and Judicial Power: Differences in Common Law Constitutional Traditions’ (2018) 26 Asia Pacific Law Review 109Google Scholar
Mandel, M (1989) The Charter of Rights and the Legalisation of Politics in Canada (Thompson Educational)Google Scholar
Manfredi, C (2001) Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Manfredi, C (2004) ‘The Life of a Metaphor: Dialogue in the Supreme Court’ in Huscroft, & Brodie, (eds.) Constitutionalism in the Charter Era (Butterworths)Google Scholar
Manfredi, C & Kelly, J (1999) ‘Six Degrees of Dialogue: A Response to Hogg and Bushell’ (1999) 37 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 513Google Scholar
Manin, B (1997) The Principles of Representative Government (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Mann, R (2018) ‘Non-Ideal Theory of Constitutional Adjudication’ (2018) 7 Global Constitutionalism 14Google Scholar
Manning, J (2001) ‘Textualism and the Equity of the Statute’ (2001) 101 Columbia Law Review 1Google Scholar
Manning, J (2010) ‘Clear Statement Rules and the Constitution’ (2010) 110 Columbia Law Review 399Google Scholar
Manow, P & Burkhart, S (2007) ‘Legislative Self-Restraint under Divided Government in Germany, 1976–2002’ (2007) 32 Legislative Studies Quarterly 167Google Scholar
Margalit, A (2010) On Compromise and Rotten Compromises (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Markovits, D (2005) ‘Democratic Disobedience’ (2005) 114 Yale Law Journal 1897Google Scholar
Marshall, G (1984) Constitutional Conventions: The Rules and Forms of Political Accountability (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Marshall, G (2003) ‘The Lynchpin of Parliamentary Intention: Lost, Stolen, or Strained?’ [2003] Public Law 236Google Scholar
Marshall, G & Moodie, G (1967) Some Problems of the Constitution (Hutchinson)Google Scholar
Martin, S (2018) ‘Declaratory Misgivings: Assisted Suicide in a Post-Nicklinson Context’ [2018] Public Law 209Google Scholar
Mashaw, J (1988) ‘As-If-Republican Interpretation’ (1988) 97 Yale Law Journal 1685Google Scholar
Mashaw, J (1997) Greed, Chaos, and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law (Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Mashaw, J (2005) ‘Between Facts and Norms: Agency Statutory Interpretation as an Autonomous Enterprise’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 497Google Scholar
Mason, P (2017) ‘Prisoners, Human Rights and the Media’ in Tumber, & Waisbord, (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Media and Human Rights (Routledge)Google Scholar
Masterman, R (2011) The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution: Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Masterman, R & Leigh, I (2013) ‘The United Kingdom’s Human Rights Project in Constitutional and Comparative Perspective’ in Masterman, & Leigh, (eds.) The United Kingdom’s Statutory Bill of Rights: Constitutional and Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Mathen, C (2007) ‘Dialogue Theory, Judicial Review, and Judicial Supremacy: A Comment on “Charter Dialogue Revisited”’ (2007) 45 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 125Google Scholar
Mathen, C (2016) ‘A Recent History of Government Responses to Constitutional Litigation’ (2016) 25 Constitutional Forum 101Google Scholar
Mathen, C (2019) Courts Without Cases: The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Matthews, D (1959) ‘The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness’ (1959) 53 American Political Science Review 1064Google Scholar
Mayhew, D (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection (Yale University Press)Google Scholar
McAdam, R (2009) ‘The Notwithstanding Taboo’ (2009) 6 Federal Governance 1Google Scholar
McCormick, C. (2022) The Constitutional Legitimacy of Law Officers in the United Kingdom (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
McCormick, C & Cowie, G (2020). The Law Officers: A Constitutional and Functional Overview (HoC Library)Google Scholar
McCrea, R (2022) ‘Boris Johnson Has Done Deep and Lasting Damage to the British Constitution’ The Irish Times (9 July 2022)Google Scholar
McDonald, L (2004a) ‘New Directions in the Australian Bill of Rights Debate’ [2004] Public Law 22Google Scholar
McDonald, L (2004b) ‘Rights, “Dialogue” and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review’ (2004) 32 Federal Law Review 1Google Scholar
McGann, A (2006) ‘Social Choice and Comparing Legislatures: Constitutional versus Institutional Constraints’ (2006) 12 Journal of Legislative Studies 443Google Scholar
McHarg, A (2008) ‘Reforming the United Kingdom Constitution: Law, Convention, Soft Law’ (2008) 71 Modern Law Review 853Google Scholar
McLachlin, B (1999) ‘Charter Myths’ (1999) 33 University of British Columbia Law Review 23Google Scholar
McLachlin, B (2019) ‘Legislated Rights: Comments by Beverley McLachlin’ Judicial Power Project post (14 February 2019). Available at: https://judicialpowerproject.org.uk/legislated-rights-comment-by-beverley-mclachlin/Google Scholar
McLean, J (2001) ‘Legislative Invalidation, Human Rights Protection and s 4 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act’ [2001] New Zealand Law Review 421Google Scholar
McLean, J (2013) ‘The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and Constitutional Propriety’ (2013) 11 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 19Google Scholar
McLean, J (2016) ‘The Unwritten Political Constitution and Its Enemies’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 119Google Scholar
McLean, J (2018) ‘The Unwritten Constitution’ in Jacobsohn, & Schor, (eds.) Comparative Constitutional Theory (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
McLean, J (2020a) ‘Between Sovereign and Subject: The Constitutional Position of the Official’ (2020) 70 University of Toronto Law Journal 167Google Scholar
McLean, J (2020b) ‘The Principle of Legality, Sovereignty and the Structure of the Constitution’ in Harris, & Mount, (eds.) The Promise of Law: Essays marking the retirement of Dame Sian Elias as Chief Justice of New Zealand (Lexisnexis New Zealand)Google Scholar
McMillan, J (2010) ‘Re-thinking the Separation of Powers’ (2010) 38 Federal Law Review 423Google Scholar
McMorrow, T (2018) ‘MAID in Canada: Debating the Constitutionality of Canada’s New Medical Assitance in Dying Law’ (2018) 44 Queen’s Law Journal 70Google Scholar
McMurtry, R (1982) ‘The Search for a Constitutional Accord – A Personal Memoir’ (1982) 8 Queens’ Law Journal 28Google Scholar
Mead, D (2015) ‘“You Couldn’t Make It Up”: Some Narratives of the Media Coverage of Human Rights’ in Ziegler, , Wicks, & Hodson, (eds.) The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship? (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Meagher, D (2011) ‘The Common Law Principle of Legality in the Age of Rights’ (2011) 35 Melbourne University Law Review 449Google Scholar
Meagher, D (2014) ‘The Principle of Legality as Clear Statement Rule: Significance and Problems’ (2014) 36 Sydney Law Review 413Google Scholar
Meagher, D & Groves, M, eds. (2017) The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand (The Federation Press)Google Scholar
Melnick, RS (1985) ‘The Politics of Partnership’ (1985) 45 Public Administration Review 653Google Scholar
Mendes, CH (2013) Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Mendes, J & Venzke, I (2018) ‘Introducing the Idea of Relative Authority’ in Mendes, & Venzke, (eds.) Allocating Authority: Who Should Do What in European and International Law? (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Merrill, T (1991) ‘The Constitutional Principle of Separation of Powers’ [1991] The Supreme Court Review 225Google Scholar
Metzger, G (2009) ‘The Interdependent Relationship between Internal and External Separation of Powers’ (2009) 59 Emory Law Journal 424Google Scholar
Mezey, M (1979) Comparative Legislatures (Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Michaels, J (2015) ‘An Enduring, Evolving Separation of Powers’ (2015) 115 Columbia Law Review 515Google Scholar
Michelman, F (1986) ‘Traces of Self-Government’ (1986) 100 Harvard Law Review 4Google Scholar
Miers, D & Page, A (1990) Legislation 2nd ed. (Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar
Mikva, AJ (1998) ‘Why Judges Should Not Be Advicegivers: A Response to Professor Neal Katyal’ (1998) 50 Stanford Law Review 1825Google Scholar
Mill, JS (1861) Considerations on Representative Government (Parker, Son, and Bourn)Google Scholar
Mill, JS (1998 [1861]) On Liberty and Other Essays (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Möller, K (2012) The Global Model of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Möllers, C (2013) The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Möllers, C (2019) ‘Separation of Powers’ in Masterman, & Schütze, (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Monaghan, H (1975) ‘Constitutional Common Law’ (1975) 89 Harvard Law Review 1Google Scholar
Moore, C (2011) ‘If Strasbourg Has Its Way, We Will All End Up as Prisoners’ The Telegraph (11 February 2011)Google Scholar
Morton, FL (1999) ‘Dialogue or Monologue?’ (1999) 20 Policy Options 23Google Scholar
Morton, FL & Knopff, FMR (2000) The Charter Revolution and the Court Party (Broadview Press)Google Scholar
Morton, PA (1991) ‘Conventions of the British Constitution’ (1991) 15 Holdsworth Law Review 114Google Scholar
Mulholland, H & Wintour, P (2011) ‘UK Will Not Defy European Court on Prisoners’ Votes, Says Kenneth Clarke’ The Guardian (9 February 2011)Google Scholar
Müller, J-W (2017) What Is Populism? (Penguin Books)Google Scholar
Munro, C (1999) Studies in Constitutional Law 2nd ed. (Butterworths)Google Scholar
Mureinik, E (1994) ‘A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights’ (1994) 10 South African Journal of Human Rights 31Google Scholar
Murkens, J (2018) ‘Judicious Review: The Constitutional Practice of the UK Supreme Court’ (2018) 77 Cambridge Law Journal 349Google Scholar
Murray, C (2010) ‘We Need to Talk: “Democratic Dialogue” and the Ongoing Saga of Prisoner Disenfranchisement’ (2010) 62 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 57Google Scholar
Murray, C (2011) ‘Playing for Time: Prisoner Disenfranchisement under the ECHR after Hirst v United Kingdom’ (2011) 22 King’s Law Journal 309Google Scholar
Murray, C (2013a) ‘The Continuation of Politics, by Other Means: Judicial Dialogue under the Human Rights Act 1998’ in Masterman, & Leigh, (eds.) The United Kingdom’s Statutory Bill of Rights: Constitutional and Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Murray, C (2013b) ‘A Perfect Storm: Parliament and Prisoner Disenfranchisement’ (2013) 66 Parliamentary Affairs 511Google Scholar
Nagel, T (1998) ‘Concealment and Exposure’ (1998) 27 Philosophy & Public Affairs 3Google Scholar
Nason, S (2016) Reconstructing Judicial Review (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Nelson, E (2014) ‘Are We on the Verge of the Death Spiral That Produced the English Revolution of 1642–1649?’ from History News Network (14 December 2014). Available at: http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/157822Google Scholar
Neslen, A (2021) ‘Boris Johnson Was “a Shambolic, Shameless Clot” Says Former Colleague’ Politico (3 April 2021). Available at: www.politico.eu/article/alan-duncan-boris-johnson-selfish-ill-disciplined-shambolic-shameless-clot/Google Scholar
Neuberger, D (2015) ‘“Judge Not, That Ye Be Not Judged”: Judging Judicial Decision-Making’ F A Mann Lecture 2015. Available at: www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-150129.pdfGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, R (1964) Presidential Power (Wiley)Google Scholar
Newman, D (2019) ‘Canada’s Notwithstanding Clause, Dialogue, and National Identities’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Nichols, T (2022) ‘The Shameless Boris Johnson’ The Atlantic (7 July 2022). Available at: www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/07/the-shameless-boris-johnson/661520/Google Scholar
Nicol, D (2002) ‘Are Convention Rights a No-Go Zone for Parliament?’ [2002] Public Law 438Google Scholar
Nicol, D (2004a) ‘Gender Reassignment and the Transformation of the Human Rights Act’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 194Google Scholar
Nicol, D (2004b) ‘The Human Rights Act and the Pol iticians’ (2004) 24 Legal Studies 451Google Scholar
Nicol, D (2006) ‘Law and Politics after the Human Rights Act’ [2006] Public Law 722Google Scholar
Nicol, D (2011) ‘Legitimacy of the Commons Debate on Prisoner Voting’ [2011] Public Law 681Google Scholar
Nicolaides, E & Snow, D (2021) ‘A Paper Tiger No More? The Media Portrayal of the Notwithstanding Clause in Saskatchewan and Ontario’ (2021) 54 Canadian Journal of Political Science 60Google Scholar
Norton, P (1990) ‘The House of Commons as a Policy Influencer’ in Norton, (ed.) Legislatures (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Norton, P (2001) ‘Playing by the Rules: The Constraining Hand of Parliamentary Procedure’ (2001) 7 Journal of Legislative Studies 13Google Scholar
Norton, P (2013a) ‘A Democratic Dialogue? Parliament and Human Rights in the United Kingdom’ (2013) 21 Asia Pacific Law Review 141Google Scholar
Norton, P (2013b) Parliament in British Politics 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan)Google Scholar
Norton, P (2016) ‘Legislative Scrutiny in the House of Lords’ in Horne, & Le Sueur, (eds.) Parliament, Legislation and Accountability (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Norton, P (2020) Governing Britain: Parliament, Ministers and Our Ambiguous Constitution (Manchester University Press)Google Scholar
Nourse, V (1999) ‘The Vertical Separation of Powers’ (1999) 49 Duke Law Journal 749Google Scholar
Nussberger, A (2017) ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: View from the Court’ in Gerards, & Brems, (eds.) Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
O’Brien, P (2017) ‘“Enemies of the People”: Judges, the Media and the Mythic Lord Chancellor’ [2017] Public Law 135Google Scholar
O’Donnell, D (2017) ‘The Sleep of Reason’ (2017) 40 Dublin University Law Journal 191Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G (1994) ‘Delegative Democracy’ (1994) 5 Journal of Democracy 55Google Scholar
Oliver, D (2003) Constitutional Reform in the UK (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Oliver, D (2006) ‘Improving the Scrutiny of Bills: The Case for Standards and Checklists’ [2006] Public Law 219Google Scholar
Oliver, D (2013) ‘Parliament and the Courts: A Pragmatic (or Principled) Defence of the Sovereignty of Parliament’ in Horne, , Drewry, & Oliver, (eds.) Parliament and the Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
O’Neill, O (2002) A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
O’Toole, F (2022) ‘Why Was Boris Johnson so Influential at such a Momentous Moment?’ The Irish Times (9 July 2022).Google Scholar
O’Regan, K (2012) ‘Text Matters: Some Reflections on the Forging of a New Constitutional Jurisprudence in South Africa’ (2012) 75 Modern Law Review 1Google Scholar
O’Regan, K (2019) ‘Contemporary Challenges for Human Rights: A View from South Africa’ in Harris, & Mount, (eds.) The Promise of Law: Essays Marking the Retirement of Dame Sian Elias as Chief Justice of New Zealand (LexisNexis NZ Ltd)Google Scholar
Ornstein, N & Mann, T, eds. (2000) The Permanent Campaign and Its Future (American Enterprise Institute)Google Scholar
Packenham, R (1990) ‘Legislatures and Political Development’ in Norton, (ed.) Legislatures: Oxford Readings in Politics and Government (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Page, E (2003) ‘The Civil Servant as Legislator: Law Making in British Administration’ (2003) 81 Public Administration 651Google Scholar
Page, E (2009) ‘Their Word Is Law: Parliamentary Counsel and Creative Policy Analysis’ [2009] Public Law 790Google Scholar
Page, E & Jenkins, B (2005) Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Pal, M (2016) ‘Electoral Management Bodies as a Fourth Branch of Government’ (2016) 21 Review of Constitutional Studies 85Google Scholar
Pal, M (2022) ‘Democracy and the Notwithstanding Clause’ Biannual Public Law Conference, University College Dublin. Unpublished paper, on file with the authorGoogle Scholar
Palmer, E (2007) Judicial Review, Socio-Economic Rights and the Human Rights Act (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Palmer, G (1985) A White Paper for New Zealand (New Zealand House of Representatives)Google Scholar
Palmer, M (2011) ‘The Law Officers and Departmental Lawyers’ [2011] New Zealand Law Journal 333Google Scholar
Palmer, M (2017) ‘Constitutional Dialogue and the Rule of Law’ (2017) 47 Hong Kong Law Journal 505Google Scholar
Paris, M-L (2016) ‘Setting the Scene: Elements of Constitutional Theory and Methodology of the Research’ in Bell, & Paris, (eds.) Rights-Based Constitutional Review (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Paterson, A (2013) Final Judgment: The Last Law Lords and the Supreme Court (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Peretti, T (2001) In Defense of a Political Court (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Perreira, N (2015) ‘The Supreme Court in a Final Push to Go beyond Strasbourg’ [2015] Public Law 367Google Scholar
Perry, A (2019) ‘Strained Interpretations’ (2019) 39 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 316Google Scholar
Perry, M (2003) ‘Protecting Human Rights in a Democracy: What Role for the Courts?’ (2003) 38 Wake Forest Law Review 635Google Scholar
Petersen, N (2017) Proportionality and Judicial Activism: Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Petrie, N (2019) ‘Indications of Inconsistency’ (2019) 78 Cambridge Law Journal 612Google Scholar
Petter, A (2007) ‘Taking Dialogue Theory Much Too Seriously (or Perhaps Charter Dialogue Isn’t Such a Good Thing After All)’ (2007) 45 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 147Google Scholar
Pettit, P (1999) ‘Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratisation’ in Shapiro, & Hacker-Cordon, (eds.) Democracy’s Values (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Pettit, P (2012) On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Phillips, N (2010) ‘The Art of the Possible: Statutory Interpretation and Human Rights’ The First Lord Alexander of Weedon Lecture, Inner Temple (22 April 2010)Google Scholar
Phillipson, G (2006) ‘Deference, Discretion, and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’ [2006] Current Legal Problems 40Google Scholar
Phillipson, G (2013) ‘The Human Rights Act, Dialogue and Constitutional Principles’ in Masterman, & Leigh, (eds.) The United Kingdom’s Statutory Bill of Rights: Constitutional and Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Phillipson, G (2014) ‘Deference and Dialogue in the Real-World Counter-terrorism Context’ in Davis, & De Londras, (eds.) Critical Debates in Counter-terrorism Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Phillipson, G (2016) ‘A Dive into Deep Constitutional Waters: Article 50, the Prerogative and Parliament’ (2016) 79 Modern Law Review 1064Google Scholar
Pickerill, M (2004) Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System (Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Pierce, R (1989) ‘Separation of Powers and the Limits of Independence’ (1989) 30 William & Mary Law Review 365Google Scholar
Pildes, R (2014) ‘Romanticising Democracy, Political Fragmentation, and the Decline of American Government’ (2014) 124 Yale Law Journal 804Google Scholar
Pillard, C (2005) ‘The Unfulfilled Promise of the Constitution in Executive Hands’ (2005) 103 Michigan Law Review 676Google Scholar
Pinker, S (2007) The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature (Penguin)Google Scholar
Pinker, S (2018) Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism and Progress (Penguin)Google Scholar
Pitkin, H (1967) The Concept of Representation (University of California Press)Google Scholar
Poirier, J (2001) ‘The Functions of Intergovernmental Agreements: Post-Devolution Concordats in a Comparative Perspective’ 2001 Public Law 134Google Scholar
Poole, T (2005) ‘Harnessing the Power of the Past? Lord Hoffmann and the Belmarsh Detainees Case’ (2005) 32 Journal of Law and Society 534Google Scholar
Poole, T (2007a) ‘Courts and Conditions of Uncertainty in “Times of Crisis”’ 2007 Public Law 555Google Scholar
Poole, T (2007b) ‘Tilting at Windmills? Truth and Illusion in “The Political Constitution”’ (2007) 70 Modern Law Review 250Google Scholar
Poole, T (2008) ‘Courts and Conditions of Uncertainty in “Times of Crisis”’ [2008] Public Law 234Google Scholar
Popelier, P (2017) ‘Evidence-Based Lawmaking: Influences, Obstacles and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Gerards, & Brems, (eds.) Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Posner, E & Vermeule, A (2008) ‘Constitutional Showdowns’ (2008) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 991Google Scholar
Posner, E & Vermeule, A (2010) The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Posner, R (2000) ‘Law and Disagreement’ (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 582Google Scholar
Post, R & Siegel, R (2003a) ‘Legislative Constitutionalism and Section Five Power: Policentric Interpretation of the Family and Medical Leave Act’ (2003) 112 Yale Law Journal 1943Google Scholar
Post, R & Siegel, R (2003b) ‘Protecting the Constitution from the People: Juricentric Restrictions on Section Five Power’ (2003) 78 Indiana Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Powell, C (2019) ‘We the People: These United Divided States’ (2019) 40 Fordham Law Review 2685Google Scholar
Pozen, D (2010) ‘Deep Secrecy’ (2010) 62 Stanford Law Review 257Google Scholar
Pozen, D (2014) ‘Self-Help and the Separation of Powers’ (2014) 124 Yale Law Journal 2Google Scholar
Prendergast, D (2019) ‘The Judicial Role in Protecting Democracy from Populism’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 245Google Scholar
Putnam, R (1994) Making Democracies Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Putnam, R (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon & Schuster)Google Scholar
Quinlan, M (1993) ‘Ethics in the Public Service’ (1993) 6 Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administrations, and Institutions 538Google Scholar
Radcliffe, L (1968) Not in Feather Beds (Hamish Hamilton)Google Scholar
Rawlings, R (2005) ‘Review, Revenge and Retreat’ (2005) 68 Modern Law Review 378Google Scholar
Rawls, J (1971) A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Rawls, J (2005) Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
Raz, J (1979) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Raz, J (1994) Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Raz, J (1995a) ‘Interpretation Without Retrieval’ in Marmor, (ed.) Law and Interpretation (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Raz, J (1995b) ‘Rights and Politics’ (1995) 71 Indiana Law Journal 27Google Scholar
Raz, J (1996) ‘Intention in Interpretation’ in George, (ed.) The Autonomy of Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Raz, J (1998a) ‘Disagreement in Politics’ (1998) 43 American Journal of Jurisprudence 25Google Scholar
Raz, J (1998b) ‘On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries’ in Alexander, (ed.) Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Raz, J (2001) ‘Sorensen: Vagueness Had No Function in Law’ (2001) 7 Legal Theory 417Google Scholar
Raz, J (2009) Between Authority and Interpretation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Reese, SD & Lewis, SC (2009) ‘Framing the War on Terror: The Internalisation of Policy in the US Press’ (2009) 10 Journalism 777Google Scholar
Regan, P (2012) ‘Enacting Legislation – a Civil Servant’s Perspective’ (2012) 34 Statute Law Review 32Google Scholar
Reid, L (1972) ‘The Judge as Lawmaker’ [1972] Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 22Google Scholar
Reid, L (1997) ‘The Judge as Lawmaker’ (1997) 63 Arbitration 180Google Scholar
Renan, D (2017) ‘The Law Presidents Make’ (2017) 103 Virginia Law Review 805Google Scholar
Rhodes, R (2011) Everyday Life in British Government (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Rishworth, P (2016) ‘Writing Things Unwritten: Common Law in New Zealand’s Constitution’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 137Google Scholar
Ritchie, L (2013) Metaphor (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Rivers, J (2006) ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’ (2006) 65 Cambridge Law Journal 174Google Scholar
Rizza, A (2018) ‘400 Legal Professionals Oppose Ontario’s Use of the Notwithstanding Clause’ Global News (17 September 2018)Google Scholar
Roach, K (2004) ‘Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics’ (2004) 23 Supreme Court Law Review 49Google Scholar
Roach, K (2005) ‘Constitutional, Remedial, and International Dialogues about Rights: The Canadian Experience’ (2005) 40 Texas International Law Journal 537Google Scholar
Roach, K (2006) ‘Not Just the Government’s Lawyer: The Attorney General as Defender of the Rule of Law’ (2006) 31 Queen’s Law Journal 598Google Scholar
Roach, K (2007) ‘Sharpening the Dialogue Debate: The Next Decade of Scholarship’ (2007) 45 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 169Google Scholar
Roach, K (2009) ‘Judicial Review of Anti-Terrorism Legislation: The Post-9/11 Experience and Normative Experiences for Judicial Review’ (2009) 3 Indian Journal of Constitutional Law 138Google Scholar
Roach, K (2015) ‘The Varied Roles of Courts and Legislatures in Rights Protection’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Roach, K (2016a) ‘Remedies for Laws That Violate Rights’ in Bell, , Elliott, , Varuhas, & Murray, (eds.) Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems: Process and Substance (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Roach, K (2016b) The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue revised ed. (Irwin Law)Google Scholar
Roach, K (2017) ‘Is Brad Wall Really Defending School Choice with His Use of the Notwithstanding Clause?’ Globe and Mail (2 May 2017)Google Scholar
Roach, K (2021) Remedies for Human Rights Violations: A Two-Track Approach to Supra-National and National Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Rodriguez, C (2014) ‘Negotiating Conflict through Federalism: Institutional and Popular Perspectives’ (2014) 123 Yale Law Journal 2094Google Scholar
Rogers, J (2001) ‘Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction’ (2001) 45 American Journal of Political Science 84Google Scholar
Rogers, R & Walters, R (2015) How Parliament Works 7th ed. (Routledge)Google Scholar
Rose, D & Weir, C (2003) ‘Interpretation and Incompatibility: Striking the Balance’ in Jowell, & Cooper, (eds.) Delivering Rights: How the Human Rights Act Is Working (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S, Egidy, S & Fowkes, J (2015) Due Process of Lawmaking: The United States, Sourth Africa, Germany, and the European Union (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Rosenblum, N (1998) Membership and Morals: The Personal Uses of Pluralism in America (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Rosenblum, N (2008) On the Side of Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Roughan, N (2013) Authorities: Conflicts, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Rousseau, G & Côté, F (2017) ‘A Distinctive Quebec Theory and Practice of the Notwithstanding Clause: When Collective Interests Outweigh Individual Rights’ (2017) 47 Revue generale de droit 343Google Scholar
Roux, T (2013) The Politics of Principle (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Roux, T (2018) ‘In Defence of Empirical Entanglement: The Methodological Flaw in Waldron’s Case against Judicial Review’ in Levy, , Kong, , Orr, & King, (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Rowbottom, J (2007) ‘The Ban on Political Advertising and Article 10’ (2007) 18 Entertainment Law Review 91Google Scholar
Rowbottom, J (2013) ‘Animal Defenders International: Speech, Spending, and a Change of Direction in Strasbourg’ (2013) 5 Journal of Media Law 1Google Scholar
Roy, M & Brosseau, L (2018) The Notwithstanding Clause of the Charter Background PaperGoogle Scholar
Rozenberg, J (2002) ‘Blunkett’s Blunder Confuses the Issue’ The Telegraph (30 May 2002). Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1395765/Blunketts-blunder-confuses-the-issue.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rozenberg, J (2005) ‘90-Day Detention of Suspects “Unlawful”’ The Telegraph (21 October 2005). Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1500305/90-day-detention-of-suspects-unlawful.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rozenberg, J (2020) Enemies of the People: How Judges Shape Society (Bristol University Press)Google Scholar
Runciman, D (2019) How Democracy Ends (Profile Books)Google Scholar
Russell, M (2010) ‘Parliament: Emasculated or Emancipated?’ in Hazell, (ed.) Constitutional Futures Revisited: Britain’s Constitution in 2020 (Palgrave Macmillan)Google Scholar
Russell, M (2013) The Contemporary House of Lords: Westminster Bicameralism Revived (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Russell, M & Benton, M (2012) ‘Assessing the Impact of Parliament Oversight Committees: The Select Committees in the British House of Commons’ [2012] Parliamentary Affairs 1Google Scholar
Russell, M & Cowley, P (2016) ‘The Policy Power of the Westminster Parliament: The “Parliamentary State” and the Empirical Evidence’ (2016) 29 Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administrations, and Institutions 121Google Scholar
Russell, M & Gover, D (2017) Legislation at Westminster: Parliamentary Actors and Influence in the Making of British Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Russell, M, Gover, D & Wollter, K (2016) ‘Does the Executive Dominate the Westminster Legislative Process? Six Reasons for Doubt’ (2016) 69 Parliamentary Affairs 286Google Scholar
Russell, M , et al. (2017) ‘Actors, Motivations and Outcomes in the Legislative Process: Policy Influence at Westminster’ (2017) 52 Government & Opposition 1Google Scholar
Russell, P (1991) ‘Standing Up for Notwithstanding’ (1991) 29 Alberta Law Journal 293Google Scholar
Russell, P (2007) ‘The Notwithstanding Clause: The Charter’s Homage to Parliamentary Sovereignty’ [2007] Policy Options 65Google Scholar
Russell, P (2009) ‘The Charter and Canadian Democracy’ in Manfredi, & Kelly, (eds.) Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (University of British Colombia Press)Google Scholar
Ryle, M (1994) ‘Pre-Legislative Scrutiny: A Prophylactic Approach to Protection of Human Rights’ [1994] Public Law 192Google Scholar
Sabl, A (2002) Ruling Passions: Political Offices and Democratic Ethics (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Sachs, A (2009) The Strange Alchemy of Life and Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Sachs, A (2014) ‘Global Constitutionalism: Alumni Weekend 2013’ (2014) 61 Yale Law Report 53Google Scholar
Sadurski, W (2002) ‘Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights’ (2002) 22 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 275Google Scholar
Sadurski, W (2018) ‘Constitutional Crisis in Poland’ in Graber, , Levinson, & Tushnet, (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Sadurski, W (2019) Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Sadurski, W (2020a) ‘Constitutional Democracy in the Time of Elected Authoritarians’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 324Google Scholar
Sadurski, W (2020b) ‘Constitutional Design: Lessons from Poland’s Democratic Backsliding’ (2020) 6 Constitutional Studies 59Google Scholar
Sager, L (2002) ‘Constitutional Justice’ 2002 Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 11Google Scholar
Sager, L (2004) Justice in Plainclothes: A Theory of American Constitutional Practice (Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Sales, P (2009a) ‘A Comparison of the Principle of Legality and Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2009) 125 Law Quarterly Review 598Google Scholar
Sales, P (2009b) ‘The General and the Particular: Parliament and the Courts under the scheme of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Andenas, & Fairgrieve, (eds.) Lord Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Sales, P (2012) ‘Judges and Legislature: Values into Law’ (2012) 71 Cambridge Law Journal 287Google Scholar
Sales, P (2016a) ‘Partnership and Challenge: The Courts’ Role in Managing the Integration of Rights and Democracy’ [2016] Public Law 456Google Scholar
Sales, P (2016b) ‘Rights and Fundamental Rights in English Law’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 86Google Scholar
Sales, P (2018a) ‘The Contribution of Legislative Drafting to the Rule of Law’ (2018) 77 Cambridge Law Journal 630Google Scholar
Sales, P (2018b) ‘Law Reform Challenges: The Judicial Perspective’ (2018) 39 Statute Law Review 229Google Scholar
Sales, P (2018c) ‘Legalism in Constitutional Law: Judging in a Democracy’ [2018] Public Law 687Google Scholar
Sales, P (2020) ‘Law, Democracy, and the Absent Legislator’ in Fisher, , King, & Young, (eds.) The Foundations and Future of Public Law: Essays in Honour of Paul Craig (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Sales, P & Ekins, R (2011) ‘Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2011) 127 Law Quarterly Review 217Google Scholar
Sartori, G (1966) ‘Opposition and Control: Problems and Prospects’ (1966) 1 Government & Opposition 149Google Scholar
Sathanapally, A (2012) Beyond Disagreement: Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Sathanapally, A (2017) ‘The Modest Promise of ‘Procedural Review’ in Fundamental Rights Cases’ in Gerards, & Brems, (eds.) Procedural Review in Europeam Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Saul, M (2015) ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Margin of Appreciation and the Processes of National Parliaments’ (2015) 15 Human Rights Law Review 745Google Scholar
Saul, M (2016) ‘Structuring Evaluations of Parliamentary Processes by the European Court of Human Rights’ (2016) 20 International Journal of Human Rights 1077Google Scholar
Saul, M (2017) ‘Conclusion: How Does, Could and Should the International Human Rights Judiciary Interact with National Parliaments?’ in Saul, , Follesdal, & Ulfstein, (eds.) The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Schacter, J (1995) ‘Metademocracy: The Changing Structure of Legitimacy in Statutory Interpretation’ (1995) 108 Harvard Law Review 593Google Scholar
Schacter, J (2006) ‘Political Accountability, Proxy Accountability, and the Democratic Legitimacy of Legislatures’ in Bauman, & Kahana, (eds.) The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Schacter, J (2011) ‘Ely at the Altar: Political Process Theory through the Lens of the Marriage Debate’ (2011) 109 Michigan Law Review 1363Google Scholar
Schaeffer, A (2005) ‘Linking Marleasing and s. 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2005) 10 Judicial Review 72Google Scholar
Schapiro, R (2009) Polyphonic Federalism: Toward the Protection of Fundamental Rights (University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Schauer, F (1995) ‘Ashwander Revisited’ (1995) 1995 Supreme Court Review 71Google Scholar
Schauer, F (2006a) ‘Legislatures as Rule-Followers’ in Bauman, & Kahana, (eds.) The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Schauer, F (2006b) ‘Foreword: The Court’s Agenda – and the Nation’s’ (2006) 120 Harvard Law Review 4Google Scholar
Schauer, F (2008) ‘Authority and Authorities’ (2008) 94 Vanderbilt Law Review 1931Google Scholar
Schauer, F (2013) ‘Official Obedience and the Politics of Defining “Law”’ (2013) 86 Southern California Law Review 1165Google Scholar
Schauer, F (2018) ‘Rights, Constitutions and the Perils of Panglossianism’ (2018) 38 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 635Google Scholar
Schauer, F (2019) ‘Dialogue and its Discontents’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Scheppele, K (2009) ‘Parliamentary Supplements (Or Why Democracies Need More than Parliaments)’ (2009) 89 Boston University Law Review 795Google Scholar
Scheppele, K (2012) ‘The New Judicial Deference’ (2012) 92 Boston University Law Review 89Google Scholar
Schlanger, M (1999) ‘Beyond the Hero Judge: Institutional Reform Litigation as Litigation’ (1999) 97 Michigan Law Review 1994Google Scholar
Schrock, T & Welsh, R (1978) ‘Reconsidering the Constitutional Common Law’ (1978) 91 Harvard Law Review 1117Google Scholar
Scott, J & Sturm, S (2007) ‘Courts as Catalysts: Rethinking the Judicial Role in New Governance’ (2007) 13 Columbia Journal of European Law 565Google Scholar
Schütze, R (2009) From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Searing, D (1982) ‘Rules of the Game in Britain: Can the Politicians Be Trusted?’ (1982) 76 American Political Science Review 239Google Scholar
Sedley, S (2008) ‘No Ordinary Law’ London Review of Books 20 (5 June 2008)Google Scholar
Sedley, S (2009) ‘The Long Sleep’ in Andenas, & Fairgrieve, (eds.) Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Sedley, S (2015) Lions under the Throne: Essays on the History of English Public Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Shah, S, Poole, T & Blackwell, M (2014) ‘Rights, Interveners, and the Law Lords’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 295Google Scholar
Shane, P (2003) ‘When Inter-Branch Norms Break Down: Of Arms-for-Hostages, “Orderly Shutdowns”, Presidential Impeachments, and Judicial “Coups”’ (2003) 12 Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 503Google Scholar
Shapiro, S (2016) ‘What Is the Internal Point of View?’ (2016) 75 Fordham Law Review 1157Google Scholar
Sharpe, A (2007a) ‘A Critique of the Gender Recognition Act 2007’ (2007) 4 Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 33Google Scholar
Sharpe, A (2007b) ‘Endless Sex: The Gender Recognition Act 2004 and the Persistence of a Legal Category’ (2007) 15 Feminist Legal Studies 57Google Scholar
Sharpe, A (2009) ‘Gender Recognition in the UK: A Great Leap Forward’ (2009) 18 Social & Legal Studies 241Google Scholar
Shepsle, K (1992) ‘Congress Is a “They”, Not an “It”: Legislative Intent as Oxymoron’ (1992) 12 International Journal of Law and Economics 239Google Scholar
Sherry, S (2001) ‘Too Clever by Half: The Problem with Novelty in Constitutional Law’ (2001) 95 Northwestern University Law Review 921Google Scholar
Shetreet, S & Turenne, S (2013) Judges on Trial: The Independence and Accountability of the English Judiciary (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Shils, E (1997) The Virtue of Civility: Selected Essays on Liberalism, Tradition, and Civil Society (Liberty Fund)Google Scholar
Shipman, T & Doyle, J (2011) ‘End This Human Rights Insanity: PM’s Fury as Judges Rule Paedophiles and Rapists Should Have Chance to Get off Sex Offenders’ Register’ Daily Mail (16 February 2011)Google Scholar
Shipman, T & Wheeler, C (2019) ‘“Sack Me If You Dare”, Boris Johnson Will Tell the Queen’ The Times (6 October 2019)Google Scholar
Shogimen, T (2008) ‘Treating the Body Politic: The Medical Metaphor of Political Rule in Late Medieval Europe and Tokugawa Japan’ (2008) 70 Review of Politics 77Google Scholar
Siegel, N (2017) ‘Political Norms, Constitutional Conventions, and President Donald Trump’ (2017) 93 Indiana Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Siegel, N (2018) ‘After the Trump Era: A Constitutional Role Morality for Presidents and Members of Congress’ (2018) 107 Georgetown Law Journal 109Google Scholar
Siegel, R (2017) ‘Community in Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage and Backlash’ (2017) 64 UCLA Law Review 1728Google Scholar
Sigalet, G (2019) ‘On Dialogue and Domination’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Sigalet, G, Webber, G & Dixon, R, eds. (2019a) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Sigalet, G, Webber, G & Dixon, R, (2019b) ‘Introduction: The “What” and “Why” of Constitutional Dialogue’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Silkin, SC (1978) ‘The Functions and Position of the Attorney General in the United Kingdom’ (1978) 59 The Parliamentarian 149Google Scholar
Simons, M (2015) ‘What’s With all the War Metaphors? We Have Wars when Politics Fails’ The Guardian (16 February 2015)Google Scholar
Singh, R (2013) ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act on Advocacy’ in Masterman, & Leigh, (eds.) The United Kingdom’s Statutory Bill of Rights: Constitutional and Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Slack, J (2016) ‘Enemies of the People’ The Daily Mail (4 November 2016)Google Scholar
Slattery, B (1987) ‘A Theory of the Charter’ (1987) 25 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 701Google Scholar
Smith, S (1990) ‘The Pursuit of Pragmatism’ (1990) 100 Yale Law Journal 409Google Scholar
Smith, S (2000) ‘Taking Law Seriously’ (2000) 50 University of Toronto Law Journal 241Google Scholar
Smith, Z (2019) ‘Overriding the Constitution: Populism, the Notwithstanding Clause, and Its Implications for Canada’s Rights Framework’ Kennedy School Review (20 May 2019). Available at: https://ksr.hkspublications.org/2019/05/20/overriding-the-constitution-populism-the-notwithstanding-clause-and-its-implications-for-canadas-rights-framework/Google Scholar
Snow, D (2009) ‘Notwithstanding the Override: Path Dependence, Section 33, and the Charter’ (2009) 8 Innovations: A Journal of Politics 1Google Scholar
Solove, D (1999) ‘The Darkest Domain: Deference, Judicial Review, and the Bill of Rights’ (1999) 84 Iowa Law Review 941Google Scholar
Soper, P (2002) The Ethics of Deference: Learning from Law’s Morals (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Sossin, L (2005a) ‘From Neutrality to Compassion: The Place of Civil Service Values and Legal Norms in the Exercise of Administrative Discretion’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 427Google Scholar
Sossin, L (2005b) ‘Speaking Truth to Power? The Search for Bureaucratic Independence’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Southerden, T (2014) ‘Dysfunctional Dialogue: Lawyers, Politicians and Immigrants’ Rights to Private and Family Life’ [2014] European Human Rights Law Review 252Google Scholar
Spano, R (2014) ‘Universality or Diversity of Human Rights?’ (2014) 16 Human Rights Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Spano, R (2018) ‘The Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review and the Rule of Law’ (2018) 18 Human Rights Law Journal 473Google Scholar
Spedding, J, Ellis, R & Heath, D (1872) The Works of Francis Bacon 2nd ed. (Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer)Google Scholar
Spielmann, D (2014) ‘Whither the Margin of Appreciation?’ (2014) 67 Current Legal Problems 49Google Scholar
Spigelman, HJ (2005) ‘Principle of Legality and the Clear Statement Principle’ (2005) 79 Australian Law Journal 769Google Scholar
Spitzer, H & Omara, A (2021) ‘Catalytic Courts and the Enforcement of Constitutional Educational Funding Provisions’ (2021) 49 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 45Google Scholar
Stark, S (2017a) ‘Facing Facts: Judicial Approaches to Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2017) 133 Law Quarterly Review 613Google Scholar
Stark, S (2017b) The Work of British Law Commissions: Law Reform … Now? (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Steele, J (2003) ‘Blunkett Takes Swipe at Judges’ The Telegraph (15 May 2003)Google Scholar
Stephenson, M (2008) ‘The Price of Public Action: Constitutional Doctrine and the Judicial Manipulation of Legislative Enactment Costs’ (2008) 118 Yale Law Journal 2Google Scholar
Stephenson, S (2013) ‘Constitutional Reengineering: Dialogue’s Migration from Canada to Australia’ (2013) 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 870Google Scholar
Stephenson, S (2015) ‘The Supreme Court’s Renewed Interest in Autochthonous Constitutionalism’ [2015] Public Law 394Google Scholar
Stephenson, S (2016) From Dialogue to Disagreement in Comparative Rights Constitutionalism (Federation Press)Google Scholar
Stewart, H, Carrell, S & Bowcott, O (2020) ‘Lord Keen Resigns over Boris Johnson’s Brexit Plan’ The Guardian (16 September 2020)Google Scholar
Stewart, K (2021) ‘The Rule of Law and the Role of Law Officers in its Maintenance’ Address at the Annual Conference of the Scottish Criminal Bar Association (3 December 2021)Google Scholar
Steyn, J (2005) ‘Deference: A Tangled Story’ [2005] Public Law 346Google Scholar
Stoker, G (2006) Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work (Palgrave Macmillan)Google Scholar
Stone, A (2008) ‘Judicial Review without Rights: Some Problems for the Democratic Legitimacy of Structural Judicial Review’ (2008) 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1Google Scholar
Stone, HF (1936) ‘The Common Law in the United States’ (1936) 50 Harvard Law Review 4Google Scholar
Stone, L & Gray, J (2021) ‘Ford to Invoke Notwithstanding Clause to Override Supreme Court Ruling on Election Advertising’ The Globe and Mail (9 June 2021)Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A (2000) Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A (2007) ‘The Politics of Constitutional Review in France and Europe’ (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 69Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A & Mathews, J (2009) ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’ (2009) 47 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 72Google Scholar
Strauss, D (1988) ‘The Ubiquity of Prophylactic Rules’ (1988) 55 University of Chicago Law Review 190Google Scholar
Strauss, P (1987) ‘Formal and Functional Approaches to Separation of Powers Questions: A Foolish Inconsistency’ (1987) 72 Cornell Law Review 488Google Scholar
Straw, J (1999) Building a Human Rights Culture Address to Civil Service College Seminar (9 December 1999). Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20001008031658/http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk:80/hract/cscspe.htmGoogle Scholar
Straw, J (2000) Speech to the Institute of Policy Research (13 January 2000).Google Scholar
Straw, J (2012) Last Man Standing: Memoirs of a Political Survivor (Pan Books)Google Scholar
Straw, J (2013) Aspects of Law Reform: An Insider’s Perspective (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Straw, J & Boateng, P (1997) ‘Bringing Rights Home: Labour’s Plans to Incorporate the European Convention on Human Rights into UK Law’ [1997] European Human Rights Law Review 71Google Scholar
Stuart, M (2018) ‘Whips and Rebels’ in Leston-Bandeira, & Thompson, (eds.) Exploring Parliament (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Sturgeon, N (2022) ‘Nicola Sturgeon Calls Boris Johnson “Disgrace to Office of Prime Minister”’ The Guardian (13 August 2022)Google Scholar
Sumption, J (2014) Anxious Scrutiny Administrative Law Bar Association Annual Lecture, available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-141104.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sumption, J (2019) Trials of the State: Law and the Decline of Politics (Profile Books)Google Scholar
Sumption, J (2022a) ‘Partygate Is Really about Leadership, Lies and the Death of Trust’ The Telegraph (29 May 2022)Google Scholar
Sumption, J (2022b) ‘Our System of Conventions Won out This Time. But if Johnson Had Been Mad as Well as Bad, the Whole Edifice Could Have Fallen’ The Times (10 July 2022)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C (1988) ‘Constitutions and Democracy: An Epilogue’ in Elster, & Slagstad, (eds.) Constitutionalism and Democracy (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C (1989) ‘Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State’ (1989) 103 Harvard Law Review 403Google Scholar
Sunstein, C (1993) The Partial Constitution (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C (1996) ‘Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided’ (1996) 110 Harvard Law Review 4Google Scholar
Sunstein, C (2000) ‘Nondelegation Canons’ (2000) 67 University of Chicago Law Review 315Google Scholar
Sunstein, C (2015) Constitutional Personae (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C (2016) ‘The Most Knowledgeable Branch’ (2016) 164 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1607Google Scholar
Sunstein, C, ed. (2018a) Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America (Harper Collins)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C, (2018b) ‘Lessons from the American Founding’ in Sunstein, (ed.) Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America (Harper Collins)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C & Hastie, R (2015) Wiser: Getting beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter (Harvard Business Review Press)Google Scholar
Taggart, M (2008) ‘Proportionality, Deference, Wednesbury’ (2008) 3 New Zealand Law Review 423Google Scholar
Tait, J (1997) ‘The Public Service Lawyer, Service to the Client and the Rule of Law’ 1997 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 542Google Scholar
Tassé, R (1989) ‘Application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ in Beaudoin, & Ratushny, (eds.) The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 2nd ed. (Carswell)Google Scholar
Taylor, A (2022) ‘The Cringe of Boris Johnson’ The Washington Post (7 July 2022). Available at: www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/07/07/boris-johnson-cring-shameless-liability/Google Scholar
Taylor, G (2014) ‘Convention by Consensus: Constitutional Conventions in Germany’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 303Google Scholar
Tew, Y (2020) Constitutional Statecraft in Asian Courts (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Tham, J-C (2010) ‘Parliamentary Deliberation and the National Security Executive: The Case of Control Orders’ [2010] Public Law 79Google Scholar
Thomas, L (2014) The Judiciary, the Executive and Parliament: Relationships and the Rule of Law (Institute for Government) Keynote SpeechGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L (2015a) Judicial Leadership: Overhauling the Machinery of Justice (UCL Constitution Unit) Conference on the Paradox of Judicial IndependenceGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L (2015b) Judicial Independence in a Changing Constitutional Landscape Speech to the Commonwealth Magistrates’ and Judges’ AssociationGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L (2017a) The Judiciary within the State – Governance and Cohesion of the Judiciary (Hebrew University, Jerusalem) Lionel Cohen LectureGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L (2017b) The Judiciary within the State – The Relationship between the Branches of State (Palace of Westminster) Michael Ryle Memorial LectureGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L (2017c) Speech after Dinner for Her Majesty’s Judges (Mansion House, London)Google Scholar
Thompson, L & McNulty, T (2018) ‘Committee Scrutiny of Legislation’ in Leston-Bandeira, & Thompson, (eds.) Exploring Parliament (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Thornburg, E (1995) ‘Metaphors Matter: How Images of Battle, Sports, and Sex Shape the Adversary System’ (1995) 10 Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 225Google Scholar
Thornhill, C (2016) ‘The Mutation of International Law in Contemporary Constitutions: Thinking Sociologically about Political Constitutionalism’ (2016) 79 Modern Law Review 207Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A (1835 [2003]) Democracy in America, ed. Bevan, & Kramnick, (Penguin)Google Scholar
Tolley, M (2009) ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny of Rights in the United Kingdom: Assessing the Work of the Joint Committee on Human Rights’ (2009) 44 Australian Journal of Political Science 41Google Scholar
Tomkins, A (1998) The Constitution after Scott: Government Unwrapped (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Tomkins, A (2001) ‘Introduction: On Being Sceptical about Human Rights’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Tomkins, A (2002a) ‘In Defence of the Political Constitution’ (2002) 22 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 157Google Scholar
Tomkins, A (2002b) ‘Legislating against Terror: The Antiterrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001’ [2002] Public Law 205Google Scholar
Tomkins, A (2003) Public Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Tomkins, A (2011) ‘Parliament, Human Rights, and Counter-Terrorism’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Tomkins, A (2013) ‘What’s Left of the Political Constitution?’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 2275Google Scholar
Tourkochoriti, I (2019) ‘What is the Best Way to Realise Rights?’ (2019) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1Google Scholar
Toynbee, P (2022) ‘Today’s Elections are the Last Before the Tories Vandalise Our Democratic Rights’ The Guardian (5 May 2022). Available at: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/may/05/boris-johnson-poisoned-political-system-electoral-reformGoogle Scholar
Travis, A (2003a) ‘Life Means Life for Child Killers, Says Blunkett’ The Guardian (7 May 2003)Google Scholar
Travis, A (2003b) ‘Out of Touch Judges Should Live in the Real World, Says Blunkett’ The Guardian (15 May 2003)Google Scholar
Travis, A (2004) ‘Blunkett on Film Sways Judges’ The Guardian (17 November 2004)Google Scholar
Tremblay, L (2005) ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review: The Limits of Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 617Google Scholar
Trueblood, L (2019) ‘Book Review: Webber et al., Legislated Rights: Securing Human Rights through Legislation’ (2019) 82 Modern Law Review 577Google Scholar
Tsarapatsanis, D (2020) ‘Rights, Values and Really Existing Legislatures’ (2020) 11 Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 610Google Scholar
Tsereteli, N (2017) ‘The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Facilitating Legislative Change in Cases of Long-Term Delays in Implementation’ in Saul, , Follesdal, & Ulfstein, (eds.) The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Tulkens, F (2022) ‘Judicial Activism v Judicial Restraint: Practical Experience of This (False) Dilemma at the European Court of Human Rights’ [2022] European Human Rights Law Review 1Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (1995) ‘Policy Distortion and Democratic Debilitation: Comparative Illumination of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty’ (1995) 94 Michigan Law Review 245Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (1999) Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2001) ‘Subconstitutional Constitutional Law: Supplement, Sham, or Substitute?’ (2001) 42 William & Mary Law Review 1871Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2003a) ‘Alternative Forms of Judicial Review’ (2003) 101 Michigan Law Review 2781Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2003b) ‘Judicial Activism or Restraint in a Section 33 World’ (2003) 53 University of Toronto Law Journal 89Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2003c) ‘New Forms of Judicial Review and the Persistence of Rights and Democracy-Based Worries’ (2003) 38 Wake Forest Law Review 813Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2004) ‘Constitutional Hardball’ (2004) 37 Marshall Law Review 523Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2008a) ‘Dialogic Judicial Review’ (2008) 61 Arkansas Law Review 205Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2008b) Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2011a) ‘The Rise of Weak-Form Judicial Review’ in Ginsburg, & Dixon, (eds.) Comparative Constitutional Law: Research Handbooks in Comparative Law (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2011b) ‘The Political Institutions of Rights-Protection’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2021) The New Fourth Branch: Institutions for Protecting Constitutional Democracy (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Tushnet, M & Bugaric, B (2021) Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Tushnet, M & Dixon, R (2014) ‘Weak-Form Review and Its Constitutional Relatives: An Asian Perspective’ in Dixon, & Ginsburg, (eds.) Comparative Constitutional Law in Asia (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Tyler, A (2005) ‘Continuity, Coherence, and the Canons’ (2005) 99 Northwestern University Law Review 1389Google Scholar
Uhr, J (2006) ‘The Performance of Australian Legislatures in Protecting Rights’ in Campbell, , Goldsworthy, & Stone, (eds.) Protecting Rights without a Bill of Rights (Ashgate)Google Scholar
Upton, J (2003) ‘He Huffs and He Puffs’ London Review of Books (19 June 2003)Google Scholar
Urbinati, N (2000) ‘Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation’ (2000) 28 Political Theory 758Google Scholar
Valiante, G (2019) ‘Canadian Bar Association Calls on Quebec to Drop Notwithstanding Clause from Bill 21’ National Observer (5 April 2019)Google Scholar
Van Zyl Smit, J (2007) ‘The New Purposive Interpretation of Statutes: HRA Section 3 after Ghaidan v Mendoza’ (2007) 70 Modern Law Review 294Google Scholar
Van Zyl Smit, J (2011) ‘Statute Law: Interpretation and Declarations of Incompatibility’ in Hoffman, (ed.) The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Van Zyl Smit, J (2015) ‘Promoting the Rule of Courts or Resisting the Misuse of Courts? A Response to Ekins and Forsyth’ Judicial Power Project (15 December 2015). Available at: http://judicialpowerproject.org.uk/promoting-the-rule-of-courts-or-resisting-the-misuse-of-courts-a-response-to-professor-ekins-and-professor-forsyth/Google Scholar
Van Zyl Smit, J (2016) ‘The “Institutional Turn” in Statutory Interpretation and Its Pitfalls: The Case of the Human Rights Act 1998’ Unpublished manuscript, on file with authorGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, G (2005) The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Varuhas, J (2020) ‘The Principle of Legality’ (2020) 79 Cambridge Law Journal 578Google Scholar
Vermeule, A (1997) ‘Saving Constructions’ (1997) 85 Georgetown Law Journal 945Google Scholar
Vermeule, A (2006) Judging under Uncertainty: An Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Vermeule, A (2007) Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Vermeule, A (2011) ‘Second Opinions and Institutional Design’ (2011) 97 Virginia Law Review 1435Google Scholar
Vermeule, A (2012) ‘The Atrophy of Constitutional Powers’ (2012) 32 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 421Google Scholar
Vermeule, A (2013) ‘Conventions of Agency Independence’ (2013) 113 Columbia Law Review 1163Google Scholar
Vermeule, A (2015) ‘Conventions in Court’ (2015) 38 Dublin University Law Journal 283Google Scholar
Vile, M (1998) Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A & Paris, D (2020) ‘Building Judicial Authority: A Comparison Between the Italian Constitutional Courts and the German Federal Constitutional Court’ in Barsotti, , Carozza, , Cartabia, & Simoncini, (eds.) Dialogues on Italian Constitutional Justice - A Comparative Perspective (Routledge)Google Scholar
Waldron, J (1993a) Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Waldron, J (1993b) ‘A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18Google Scholar
Waldron, J (1999a) The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Waldron, J (1999b) Law and Disagreement (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Waldron, J (2003a) ‘Authority for Officials’ in Meyer, , Paulson, & Pogge, (eds.) Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Waldron, J (2003b) ‘Legislating with Integrity’ (2003) 72 Fordham Law Review 373Google Scholar
Waldron, J (2004) ‘Some Models of Dialogue between Judges and Legislators’ in Huscroft, & Brodie, (eds.) Constitutionalism in the Charter Era (Butterworths)Google Scholar
Waldron, J (2006) ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal 1346Google Scholar
Waldron, J (2009) ‘Judges as Moral Reasoners’ (2009) 7 International Journal of Constitutional Law 2Google Scholar
Waldron, J (2010) Torture, Terror and Trade-Offs: Philosophy for the White House (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Waldron, J (2014) ‘Judicial Review and Republican Government’ in Wolfe, (ed.) That Eminent Tribunal (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Waldron, J (2016) Political Political Theory: Essays on Institutions (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Walker, C (2007) ‘Keeping Control of Terrorists without Losing Control of Constitutionalism’ (2007) 59 Stanford Law Review 1395Google Scholar
Walker, N (1999) ‘The Antinomies of the Law Officers’ in Sunkin, & Payne, (eds.) The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Walker, R (2014) ‘How Far Should Judges Develop the Common Law?’ (2014) 3 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 124Google Scholar
Wall, S (2007) ‘Democracy and Restraint’ (2007) 26 Law & Philosophy 307Google Scholar
Waller, P (2014a) ‘Special Advisers and Communications’ in Yong, & Hazell, (eds.) Special Advisers (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Waller, P (2014b) ‘Special Advisers and the Policy-Making Process’ in Yong, & Hazell, (eds.) Special Advisers (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Walters, M (2008) ‘Written Constitutions and Unwritten Constitutionalism’ in Huscroft, (ed.) Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Walters, M (2016) ‘The Unwritten Constitution as a Legal Concept’ in Dyzenhaus, & Thorburn, (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Watt, G (2012) ‘Comparison as Deep Appreciation’ in Monateri, (ed.) Methods of Comparative Law (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Weale, A (2018) The Will of the People: A Modern Myth (Polity)Google Scholar
Webber, G (2009) ‘The Unfulfilled Potential of the Court and Legislature Dialogue’ (2009) 42 Canadian Journal of Political Science 443Google Scholar
Webber, G (2014a) ‘Eulogy for the Constitution That Was’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 468Google Scholar
Webber, G (2014b) ‘Parliament and the Management of Conflict’ 2014 Public Law 101Google Scholar
Webber, G (2016) ‘Loyal Opposition and the Political Constitution’ (2016) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1Google Scholar
Webber, G, et al. (2018) Legislated Rights: Securing Human Rights through Legislation (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Webber, J (2000) ‘Constitutional Reticence’ (2000) 25 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 125Google Scholar
Webber, J (2003) ‘Institutional Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures in the Definition of Fundamental Rights: Lessons from Canada (and Elsewhere)’ (2003) 9 Australian Journal of Human Rights 9Google Scholar
Webber, J (2006) ‘Democratic Decision-Making as the First Principle of Contemporary Constitutionalism’ in Bauman, & Kahana, (eds.) The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Weber, M (1919 [2004]) Politik als Beruf (Duncker & Humblot) trans Owen, Strong & Livingstone in The Vocation Lectures (Hackett Publishing)Google Scholar
Weiler, P (1984) ‘Rights and Judges in a Democracy: A New Canadian Version’ (1984) 18 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 51Google Scholar
Weill, R (2012) ‘Hybrid Constitutionalism: The Israeli Case for Judicial Review and Why We Should Care’ (2012) 30 Berkeley Journal of International Law 349Google Scholar
Weill, R (2014) ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism Notwithstanding: On Judicial Review and Constitution-Making’ (2014) 62 American Journal of Comparative Law 127Google Scholar
Weill, R (2016) ‘Juxtaposing Constitution-Making and Constitutional-Infringement Mechanisms in Israel and Canada: On the Interplay between Common Law Override and Sunset Override’ (2016) 49 Israel Law Review 103Google Scholar
Weinrib, L (1990) ‘Learning to Live with the Override’ (1990) 35 McGill Law Journal 541Google Scholar
Weinrib, L (2016) ‘The Canadian Charter’s Override Clause: Lessons for Israel’ (2016) 49 Israel Law Review 67Google Scholar
Weinstock, D (2013) ‘On the Possibility of Principled Moral Compromise’ (2013) 16 Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 537Google Scholar
Weis, L (2020a) ‘The Constitutional Office of the Legislature’ (2020) 70 University of Toronto Law Journal 214Google Scholar
Weis, L (2020b) ‘Situating Legislated Rights: Legislative and Judicial Role in Contemporary Constitutional Theory’ (2020) 11 Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 621Google Scholar
Wells, I (2022) ‘No 10 Parties: PM’s Lockdown Fine Constitutional Crisis, Says Historian’ BBC News website (17 April 2022). Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61134002Google Scholar
Wendel, B (2009) ‘Government Lawyers, Democracy, and the Rule of Law’ (2009) 77 Fordham Law Review 1333Google Scholar
Weston, E (2015) ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Effectiveness of Parliamentary Scrutiny’ (2015) 26 King’s Law Journal 266Google Scholar
Wheare, K (1951), Modern Constitutions (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
White, H (2022) Held in Contempt: What’s Wrong with the House of Commons? (Manchester University Press)Google Scholar
Whittington, K (2000) ‘In Defense of Legislatures’ (2000) 28 Political Theory 690Google Scholar
Whittington, K (2002) ‘Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation: Three Objections and Responses’ (2002) 80 North Carolina Law Review 773Google Scholar
Whittington, K (2003) ‘Legislative Sanctions and the Strategic Environment of Judicial Review’ (2003) 1 International Journal of Constitutional Law 446Google Scholar
Whittington, K (2005a) ‘“Interpose Your Friendly Hand”: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court’ (2005) 99 American Political Science Review 583Google Scholar
Whittington, K (2005b) ‘James Madison Has Left the Building’ (2005) 72 University of Chicago Law Review 1137Google Scholar
Whittington, K (2007) Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Whittington, K (2014) ‘The Least Activist Supreme Court in History? The Roberts Court and the Exercise of Judicial Review’ (2014) 89 Notre Dame Law Review 2219Google Scholar
Willis, E (2018) ‘Political Constitutionalism: The “Critical Morality” of Constitutional Politics’ (2019) 28 New Zealand Universities Law Review 237Google Scholar
Willis, E (2022) ‘Unwritten Constitutionalism: Stability without Entrenchment’ [2022] Public Law 386Google Scholar
Willis, J (1938) ‘Statute Interpretation in a Nutshell’ (1938) 16 Canadian Bar Review 1Google Scholar
Wilson, R (2004) ‘The Robustness of Conventions in a Time of Modernisation and Change’ [2004] Public Law 407Google Scholar
Windsor, M (2013) ‘Government Legal Advisers through the Ethics Looking Glass’ in Feldman, (ed.) Law in Politics, Politics in Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Winstone, R, ed. (2010) A View from the Foothills: The Diaries of Chris Mullin (Profile Books)Google Scholar
Wintour, P & Sparrow, A (2012) ‘I Won’t Give Prisoners the Vote, Says David Cameron’ The Guardian (24 October 2012)Google Scholar
Wiseman, D (2001) ‘The Charter and Poverty: Beyond Injusticiability’ (2001) 51 University of Toronto Law Journal 425Google Scholar
Wiseman, D (2006) ‘Competence Concerns in Charter Adjudication: Countering the Anti-Poverty Incompetence Argument’ (2006) 51 McGill Law Journal 503Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D (1997) ‘The Attorney General’ (1997) 50 Parliamentary Affairs 97Google Scholar
Woolf, H (2008) The Pursuit of Justice (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Yap, P-J (2012) ‘Defending Dialogue’ [2012] Public Law 527Google Scholar
Yap, P-J (2015) Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Yap, P-J (2017) ‘New Democracies and Novel Remedies’ 2017 Public Law 30Google Scholar
Yong, B (2013) Risk Management: Government Lawyers and the Provision of Legal Advice within Whitehall (The Constitution Society)Google Scholar
Yong, B (2014) ‘Special Advisers and British Government’ in Yong, & Hazell, (eds.) Special Advisers (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Yong, B & Hazell, R, eds. (2014) Special Advisers: Who They Are, What They Do and Why They Matter (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Young, A (2005) ‘Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza: Avoiding the Deference Trap’ [2005] Public Law 23Google Scholar
Young, A (2009) Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Young, A (2011) ‘Is Dialogue Working under the Human Rights Act 1998?’ [2011] Public Law 773Google Scholar
Young, A (2017) Democratic Dialogue and the Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Young, A (2022) ‘Partygate and the Ministerial Code: Changing the Rules to Avoid Punishment?’ Blogpost at Constitutional Law Matters (30 May 2022). Available at: https://constitutionallawmatters.org/2022/05/partygate-and-the-ministerial-code-changing-the-rules-to-avoid-punishment/Google Scholar
Young, E (2000) ‘Constitutional Avoidance, Resistance Norms, and the Preservation of Judicial Review’ (2000) 78 Texas Law Review 1549Google Scholar
Young, K (2010) ‘A Typology of Economic and Social Rights Adjudication: Exploring the Catalytic Function of Judicial Review’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 385Google Scholar
Young, K (2012) Constituting Economic and Social Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Young, K (2014) ‘American Exceptionalism and Government Shutdowns: A Comparative Constitutional Reflection on the 2013 Lapse in Appropriations’ (2014) 94 Boston University Law Review 991Google Scholar
Yowell, P (2015) ‘The Impact of the Joint Committe on Human Rights on Legislative Deliberations’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Yowell, P (2018) Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design: Moral and Empirical Reasoning in Judicial Review (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Zander, M (2018) The Law-Making Process 7th ed. (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Zeisberg, M (2004) ‘Constitutional Fidelity and Interbranch Conflict’ (2004) 13 The Good Society 24Google Scholar
Ziegler, R (2015) ‘Voting Eligibility: Strasbourg’s Timidity’ in Ziegler, , Wicks, & Hodson, (eds.) The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship? (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Zweigert, K & Kötz, H (1998) An Introduction to Comparative Law 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Aileen Kavanagh, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: The Collaborative Constitution
  • Online publication: 12 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680929.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Aileen Kavanagh, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: The Collaborative Constitution
  • Online publication: 12 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680929.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Aileen Kavanagh, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: The Collaborative Constitution
  • Online publication: 12 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680929.019
Available formats
×