Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-m789k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-03T20:35:25.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - A Capitalist State? Marx’s Ambiguous Legacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2025

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Communist Manifesto contains probably the best-known and most oftenquoted statement on the subject of the state to be found in Marx's writing, in which it is claimed that political power is in the hands of the capitalist class or bourgeoisie. However, there are other views of the state to be found in Marx and, taken as a whole, his writing constitutes an ambiguous legacy. This chapter takes the Manifesto as a starting point to explore the variety of views of the state in Marx. Although important unifying themes are identified it is shown that Marx's legacy is marked by two dimensions of ambiguity. It is argued that Marxism is still wanting a theory of the state which satisfactorily resolves these ambiguities.

THE STATE AS INSTRUMENT OF THE CAPITALIST CLASS

In the Manifesto Marx and Engels offer a characterisation of the relationship between the bourgeoisie and the state which, it has been suggested, constitutes ‘the classical Marxist view on the subject of the state’. Here it is claimed that

Each of these stages of the development of the bourgeoisie was accompanied by a corresponding political advance […] The bourgeoisie - with the establishment of largescale industry and the world market - has finally gained exclusive political control through the modern representative state. The power of the modern state is merely a device for administering the common affairs of the whole bourgeois class.

The Manifesto appears to make a rather simple and bold claim: political or state power has been conquered or taken over by the capitalist class (thus suggesting deliberate political action by that class) and is used exclusively (that is to the exclusion of other classes) to defend and advance the interests of the class. Hence the Manifesto advances a class (or ‘class-theoretical’) analysis of politics and, more specifically, an ‘instrumental’ view of the state, in which the state is viewed as an instrument controlled by the bourgeoisie for its own purposes.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Communist Manifesto
New Interpretations
, pp. 166 - 176
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×