Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:51:34.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Participation in Costa Rica: dissent within the state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

Lynn M. Morgan
Affiliation:
Mount Holyoke College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

A select history of state-sponsored health care in Costa Rica

State sponsorship of health and medical care programs was not a feature of Costa Rican society until the 1920s. Before then, health services for most of the population were provided by a few doctors and many traditional healers. The only organized health care available in the country was associated with the two major export crops: bananas and coffee. In the banana-growing enclaves on the coasts, the United Fruit Company offered medical services under an early “tropical occupational health” program designed to keep bananas supplied to foreign markets. In the coffee-growing highlands, disease control and curative efforts assisted by the Rockefeller Foundation kept coffee pickers healthy. Health care was thus offered through Costa Rica's major landowners and their foreign allies, who considered medical services a necessary economic investment. The state did not assume responsibility for health care, nor was health considered a right.

In 1850 Costa Rica was a poor and sparsely populated country beginning to find its niche in the world economic market. Coffee exports had begun around 1830, and European demand for coffee was leading to higher production. Land concentration began during this time as a coffee-growing landed elite took increasing control over commercial and political life, while subsistence farmers lost their lands and were forced to become coffee pickers (Seligson 1980). Before the 1830s there had been considerable social differentiation which led, with the growth of coffee exports, to social conflict between “on the one hand, the processorexporter- financier elite and its commercial capital, and, on the other, the smallholding cultivators beginning the long historical process of capital differentiation in agriculture” (Gudmundson 1986: 54).

Type
Chapter
Information
Community Participation in Health
The Politics of Primary Care in Costa Rica
, pp. 83 - 118
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×