Book contents
- Front matter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: flexible EU governance in domestic practice
- 2 Theorising the domestic impact of EU law: the state of the art and beyond
- 3 EU social policy over time: the role of Directives
- 4 The Employment Contract Information Directive: a small but useful social complement to the internal market
- 5 The Pregnant Workers Directive: European social policy between protection and employability
- 6 The Working Time Directive: European standards taken hostage by domestic politics
- 7 The Young Workers Directive: a safety net with holes
- 8 The Parental Leave Directive: compulsory policy innovation and voluntary over-implementation
- 9 The Part-time Work Directive: a facilitator of national reforms
- 10 Voluntary reforms triggered by the Directives
- 11 The EU Commission and (non-)compliance in the member states
- 12 Beyond policy change: convergence of national public–private relations?
- 13 Implementation across countries and Directives
- 14 Why do member states fail to comply? Testing the hypotheses suggested in the literature
- 15 Three worlds of compliance: a typology
- 16 Conclusions: myth and reality of social Europe
- References
- Index
14 - Why do member states fail to comply? Testing the hypotheses suggested in the literature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Front matter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: flexible EU governance in domestic practice
- 2 Theorising the domestic impact of EU law: the state of the art and beyond
- 3 EU social policy over time: the role of Directives
- 4 The Employment Contract Information Directive: a small but useful social complement to the internal market
- 5 The Pregnant Workers Directive: European social policy between protection and employability
- 6 The Working Time Directive: European standards taken hostage by domestic politics
- 7 The Young Workers Directive: a safety net with holes
- 8 The Parental Leave Directive: compulsory policy innovation and voluntary over-implementation
- 9 The Part-time Work Directive: a facilitator of national reforms
- 10 Voluntary reforms triggered by the Directives
- 11 The EU Commission and (non-)compliance in the member states
- 12 Beyond policy change: convergence of national public–private relations?
- 13 Implementation across countries and Directives
- 14 Why do member states fail to comply? Testing the hypotheses suggested in the literature
- 15 Three worlds of compliance: a typology
- 16 Conclusions: myth and reality of social Europe
- References
- Index
Summary
This chapter discusses in detail the hypotheses on the reasons for implementation success or failure which we derived from the existing literature as well asa number of new ones which we formulated on the basis of our own theoretical considerations (see Chapter 2). We argue that the ‘upstream phase’ (i.e. features of the decision-making process which leads to the adoption of a Directive) has only a limited impact on the ‘downstream phase’ of adaptation at the national level. Furthermore, we highlight the differential impact of domestic factors in EU policy implementation. The analysis reveals that no single overriding variable may account for the transposition performance of member states, but that we need to look at the interaction of several factors. As the next chapter will show in more detail, the relevant combinations of factors and the logic of their interplay vary fundamentally in different country clusters.
Implementation problems as a result of ‘opposition through the backdoor’?
According to an intergovernmentalist view of European policy-making, the preference formation processes of the lower-level polity and the higher-level polity are clearly distinct. This implies that in cases where a national government is unsuccessful in ‘uploading’ its own preferences at the EU level as the template for the joint measure or standard, it will try to resist during the ‘downloading’ process, i.e. later at the implementation stage. Hence, in those cases where there is no national objection to a specific measure during decision-making at EU level, implementation should be unproblematic.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complying with EuropeEU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States, pp. 277 - 316Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
- 1
- Cited by