Bibliography

Barbara M. Sattler

doi:10.1017/9781108775199.011

Diels, Hermann and Kranz, Walther (eds) (1951), Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Griechisch und Deutsch, Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel W. (ed.) (2010), The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Allan, D. J. (ed.) (2005), De caelo, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia (tr.) (1976), Metaphysics Books M and N, trans. with introduction and notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (ed.) (1995), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 6th ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bekker, Immanuel (ed.) (1831), Opera, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Bonitz, Hermann (tr.) (1994), Metaphysik, ed. by Ursula, Wolf, Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel W. (tr.) (1999), Physics Books VIII, with introduction and notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (tr.) (1939), On the Heavens, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hussey, Edward (tr.) (1993), Physics Books III and IV, trans. with introduction and notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Joachim, Harold H. (ed.) (1922), On Coming-To-Be and Passing-Away, a revised text with introduction and commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Makin, Stephen (tr.) (2006), Metaphysics, Book Θ, with commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha (ed.) (1978), De motu animalium, text with translation, commentary, and interpretive essay, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pierre, Pellegrin (tr.) (2000), Physique, Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (1924), Metaphysics, revised text with introduction and commentary, 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (1936), Physics, revised text with introduction and commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ross, David (1952), Selected Fragments, trans. into English, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ross, David (1961), De anima, ed. with introduction and commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Stevens, Annick (ed.) (2012), La Physique, new edition and trans., Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Tricot, J. (tr.) (2002), Métaphysique, II. Livres Η–Ν, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Wagner, Hans (tr.) (1995), Physikvorlesung, 5th ed., Berlin: Akademieverlag.Google Scholar

Williams, C. J. F. (tr.) (1982), De generatione et corruptione, with notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Zekl, Hans Günther (tr.) (1987), Physik, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Philoponus (1887), In Aristotelis Physicorum Libros Tres Priores Commentaria. Vitelli, Edidit H.. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. XVI, Berlin: Reimer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Philoponus (1888), In Aristotelis Physicorum Libros Quinque Posteriores Commentaria. Vitelli, Edidit H.. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. XVII, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Philoponus (1994), On Aristotle Physics 5–8, translated by Paul Lettinck with Simplicius: On Aristotle on the void, translated by J. O. Urmson, introduction and notes by Peter Lautner, London.Google Scholar

Simplicius (1882), In Aristotelis Physicorum. Libros Quattuor Priores Commentaria. Edidit H. Diels. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. IX, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Simplicius (1894), In Aristotelis De caelo. Edidit Heibeg, I. L.. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. VIII, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Simplicius (1895), In Aristotelis Physicorum. Libros Quattuor Posteriores Commentaria. Edidit H. Diels. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. X, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Luria, Salomon (ed.) (1970), Demokrit, edition and translation, Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. C. W. (1999), The Atomist Leucippus and Democritus: Fragments, text and translation with a commentary, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Hultsch, Fridericus (ed.) (1885), De Sphaera quae movetur, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Lasserre, François (ed.) (1966), Die Fragmente des Eudoxos von Knidos, edition, translation, and commentary, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

West, Martin (ed.) (1966), Theogony, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Monro, David B. and Allen, Thomas W. (eds.) (1962), Homerii Opera: Tomus I, Iliadis Libros I–XII Continens; Tomus II, Iliadis Libros XIII–XXIV Continens, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Conche, Marcel (ed.) (1996), Le Poème: Fragments, edition and translation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Cordero, Néstor-Luis (ed.) (1984), Les Deux Chemins de Parménide, critical edition, translation, study, and bibliography, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Coxon, A. H. (1986), The Fragments of Parmenides, a critical text with introduction, translation, the ancient testimonia, and a commentary, Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann (ed.) (1897), Parmenides Lehrgedicht, griechisch und deutsch, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Gallop, David (1984), Fragments, a text and translation with an introduction, Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Hölscher, Uvo (1986), Parmenides. Vom Wesen des Seienden, edition and translation, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Karsten, Simon (ed.) (1835), Parmenidis Eleatae Carminis Reliquiae, Amsterdam: Mueller.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Denis (ed.) (1987), Le Poème de Parménide, edition and translation, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Tarán, Leonardo (ed.) (1965), Parmenides, text with translation, commentary, and critical essay, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Untersteiner, Mario (ed.) (1958), Parmenide: Testimonianze e Frammenti, edition, introduction, translation, and commentary, Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar

Burnet, John (1900–7), Platonis Opera, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, Myles (ed.) (1990), Theatetus, trans. by M. J. Levett, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis MacDonald (tr.) (1939), Parmenides’ Way of Truth and Plato’s Parmenides, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis MacDonald (1960), Plato’s Theory of Knowledge: The Theaetetus and Sophist of Plato, translation with a running commentary, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis MacDonald (1997), Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato, translation with a running commentary, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Eigler, Gunther (ed.) (1970), Platon, Werke in acht Bänden. Griechisch und Deutsch, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchges.Google Scholar

Rowe, Christopher (ed.) (2015), Plato: Theatetus and Sophist, edition and translation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, A. E. (1928), A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

White, Nicholas P. (1993), Plato, Sophist, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Zeyl, Donald (2000), Plato, Timaeus, translation with introduction, Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar

Heiberg, J. L. (1903), Claudii Ptolemaei opera quae exstant omnia, Vol. 1 Part 2: Syntaxis mathematica, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Toomer, G. J. (1984), Ptolemy’s Almagest, translation and annotation, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Huffman, Carl (1993), Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. A Commentary on the Fragments and Testimonia with Interpretive Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, H. D. P. (ed.) (1967), Zeno of Elea, translation with notes, Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar

Ackrill, John (1957), “Plato and the Copula: Sophist 251–259”, Journal of Hellenic Studies 77, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Algra, Keimpe (1995), Concepts of Space in Greek Thought. Philosophia Antiqua, LXV, Leiden, New York, and Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar

Algra, Keimpe (1999), “The Beginning of Cosmology”, in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. by Long, A. A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar

Alten, H. W., Djafari-Naini, A., Folkerts, M., Schlosser, H., Schlote, K.-H., and Wußing, H. (ed.) (2003), 4000 Jahre Algebra, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Anagnostopoulos, Andreas (2017), “Change, Agency and the Incomplete in Aristotle”, Phronesis 62, pp. 170–209.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia (1975), “Aristotle, Number and Time”, Philosophical Quarterly 25, pp. 97–113.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia (1981), Introduction to Plato’s Republic, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia (1987), “Die Gegenstände der Mathematik bei Aristoteles”, in Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle, ed. by Graeser, Andreas, Bern and Stuttgart: Paul Haupt, pp. 131–47.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1981), “The New Theory of Forms”, in The Collected Philosophical Papers, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre (1996), Logic or the Art of Thinking, trans. by Jill Vance Buroker, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Artmann, Benno and Schäfer, Lothar (1993), “On Plato’s ‘Fairest Triangles’ (Timaeus 54a)”, Historia Mathematica 20, pp. 255–64.Google Scholar

Austin, Scott (1986), Parmenides: Being, Bounds, and Logic, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, Scott (2002), “Parmenides, Double-Negation and Dialectic”, in Presocratic Philosophy, Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. by Caston, Victor and Graham, Daniel, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 95–9.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (1982), The Presocratic Philosophers, rev. ed., London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (1986), “Peripatetic Negations”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy IV, pp. 201–14.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (1995), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Becker, Oskar (1951), Geschichte der Mathematik, Bonn: Athenäum-Verlag.Google Scholar

Benardete, José (1964), Infinity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berka, Karel (1983), Measurement: Its Concepts, Theories and Problems, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Berryman, Sylvia (2002), “Democritus and the Explanatory Power of the Void”, in Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. by Caston, V and Graham, D, London: Ashgate, pp. 183–91.Google Scholar

Betegh, Gábor (2010), “What Makes a Mythos eikôs? Remarks Inspired by Myles Burnyeat’s ‘EIKÔS MYTHOS’”, in One Book, the Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today, ed. by Mohr, Richard and Sattler, Barbara, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, pp. 213–24.Google Scholar

Betegh, Gábor (2016), “Colocation”, in ΣΩΜΑ. Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der antiken Philosophie und Literatur, ed. by Buchheim, Thomas, Wachsmann, Nora, and Meißner, David, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, pp. 393–421.Google Scholar

Black, Max (1951), “Achilles and the Tortoise”, Analysis 11, pp. 91–101.CrossRef Google Scholar

Black, Max (1954), “Is Achilles Still Running?”, in Problems of Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 109–26.Google Scholar

Bodnár, István (1998), “Atomic Independence and Indivisibility”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XVI, pp. 35–61.Google Scholar

Bodnár, István (2012), “Sôzein ta phainomena: Some Semantic Considerations”, Croatian Journal of Philosophy 35, pp. 269–81.Google Scholar

Bostock, David (1972–3), “Aristotle, Zeno, and the Potential Infinite”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73, pp. 37–51.Google Scholar

Bostock, David (1980), “Aristotle’s Account of Time”, Phronesis 25, pp. 148–69.Google Scholar

Bostock, David (1991), “Aristotle on Continuity in Physics VI”, in Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, ed. by Judson, Lindsay, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 179–212.Google Scholar

Bostock, David (2006), Space, Time, Matter, and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boyer, Carl (1968), A History of Mathematics, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Brague, Rémi (1982), Du temps chez Plato et Aristote. Quatre études, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brandwood, Leonard (1976), A Word Index to Plato. Compendia (Computer-Generated Aids to Literary and Linguistic Research), v. 8, Leeds: W. S. Maney and Son.Google Scholar

Broadie, Sarah (2012), Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Broadie, Sarah (2019), “Aristotle, Physics I.9: Responding to the Platonists”, in Aristotle’s Physics Alpha, Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. by Ierodiakonou, Katerina, Kalligas, Paul, and Karasmanis, Vassilis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 302–40.Google Scholar

Brown, Lesley (1986), “Being in the Sophist: A Syntactical Enquiry, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy IV, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar

Brown, Lesley (1994), “The Verb ‘To Be’ in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks”, in Language, ed. by Everson, S, Companions to Ancient Thought 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–36.Google Scholar

Brown, Lesley (2008), “The Sophist on Statements, Predication, and Falsehood”, in The Oxford Handbook of Plato, ed. by Fine, Gail, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 437–62.Google Scholar

Bryan, Jenny (2011), Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter (1972), Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, trans. by E. L. Minar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burnet, John (1930), Early Greek Philosophy, 4th ed., London: Black.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, Myles (2005), “Eikôs mythos”, Rhizai 2:2, pp. 143–65.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, Myles (2008), “Kinêsis vs Energeia: A Much-Read Passage in (but not of) Aristotle’s Metaphysics”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34, pp. 219–92.Google Scholar

Cantor, Georg (1966), Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts. Mit erläuternden Anmerkungen sowie mit Ergänzungen aus dem Briefwechsel Cantor-Dedekind, ed. by Zermelo, Ernst, Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar

Cantor, Georg (1984), Über unendliche, lineare Punktmannigfaltigkeiten. Arbeiten zur Mengenlehre aus den Jahren 1872–1884, ed. and commentary by Asser, G, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Caveing, Maurice (1998), L’irrationalité dans les mathématiques grecques jusqu’à Euclide, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar

Cerri, Giovanni (2011), “The Astronomical Section in Parmenides’ Poem” in Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. by Cordero, Néstor-Luis, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, pp. 167–89.Google Scholar

Charlton, William (1991), “Aristotle’s Potential Infinites”, in Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, ed. by Judson, Lindsay, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–49.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. F. (1935), Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. F. (1944), Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. F. (1954), “A Much Misread Passage of the Timaeus (Timaeus 49C7–50B5)”, The American Journal of Philology 75, pp. 113–30.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. F. (1957), “The Relation of the Timaeus to Plato’s Later Dialogues”, in Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, ed. Allen, R. E., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 339–78.Google Scholar

Cleary, John (1995), Aristotle and Mathematics: Aporetic Method in Cosmology and Metaphysics. Philosophia Antiqua, 67, Leiden, New York, and Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar

Code, Alan (1976), “Aristotle’s Response to Quine’s Objection to Modal Logic”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5:2, pp. 159–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Code, Murray (1982a), “Zeno’s Paradoxes I: The Standard Mathematical Response”, Nature and System 4, pp. 45–58.Google Scholar

Code, Murray (1982b), “Zeno’s Paradoxes II: A Whiteheadean Response”, Nature and System 4, pp. 59–75.Google Scholar

Conen, Paul (1964), Die Zeittheorie des Aristoteles, Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Coope, Ursula (2005), Time for Aristotle: Physics IV. 10–14, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coope, Ursula (2012), “Aristotle on the Infinite”, in Oxford Handbook of Aristotle, ed. by Shields, Christopher, Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 267–86.Google Scholar

Cordero, Néstor-Luis (1979), “Les deux chemins de Parménide dans les fragments 6 et 7”, Phronesis 24, pp. 1–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cordero, Néstor-Luis (2004), By Being, it Is: The Thesis of Parmenides, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, pp. 105–24.Google Scholar

Cordero, Néstor-Luis (2011), “Parmenidean Physics Is Not Part of What He Calls ‘Doxa’”, in Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. by Cordero, Néstor-Luis, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, pp. 95–113.Google Scholar

Crivelli, Paolo (2012), Plato’s Account of Falsehood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crombie, A. C. (1996), Science, Art and Nature in Medieval and Modern Thought, London: Hambledon Press.Google Scholar

Curd, Patricia (1998), The Legacy of Parmenides, Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Curd, Patricia (2011), “New Work on the Presocratics”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 49, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar

Curd, Patricia and Graham, Daniel (eds.) (2008), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael (2014), “Razing Structures to the Ground”, in Analytic Philosophy 55, pp. 276–94.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael (2020), The Parmenidean Ascent, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Denyer, Nicholas (1991), Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dixsaut, Monique and Brancacci, Aldo (2002), Platon, sources des Présocratiques. Exploration, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Dorter, Kenneth (2012), “Appearance and Reality in Parmenides”, in Metaphysics, ed. by Pestana, Mark, Rijeka: InTech, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar

Duhem, Pierre (1908), Sōzein ta phainomena. Essai sur la notion de théorie physique de Platon à Galilée, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Duhem, Pierre (1969), To Save the Phenomena: An Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory from Plato to Galileo, trans. by Edmund Doland and Chaninah Maschler, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duncombe, Matthew (2015), “Aristotle’s Two Accounts of Relatives in Categories 7”, Phronesis 60, pp. 436–61.Google Scholar

Eberle, Stephan (1998), “Das Zeit-Raum-Kontinuum bei Zenon von Elea”, Philosophisches Jahrbuch 105, pp. 85–99.Google Scholar

Ellis, Brian (1968), Basic Concepts of Measurement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Falcon, Andrea (2015), “Aristotle on Causality”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Zalta, Edward N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/aristotle-causality/.Google Scholar

Ferber, Rafael (1995), Zenons Paradoxien der Bewegung und die Struktur von Raum und Zeit, 2nd rev. ed., Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. H. (1999), The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy: A New Reconstruction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fränkel, Hermann (1955), “Parmenidesstudien”, in Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens. Literarische und philosophiegeschichtliche Studien, ed. by Tietze, Franz, Munich: C. H. Beck, pp. 157–97.Google Scholar

Fränkel, Hermann (1962), Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums, Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Frede, Michael (1967), Prädikation und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch von “ … ist … ” und “ … ist nicht … ” im Sophistes, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Frede, Michael (1992), “Plato’s Sophist on False Statements”, in The Cambridge Companion to Plato, ed. by Kraut, Richard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–424.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob (1892), “Über Begriff und Gegenstand”, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16, pp. 192–205.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob (1918–19), “Verneinung, eine logische Untersuchung”, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1, pp. 143–57.Google Scholar

Furley, David (1967), Two Studies in the Greek Atomists, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Furley, David (1987), The Greek Cosmologists, Vol. 1: The Formation of the Atomic Theory and its Earliest Critics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Furley, David (1989), “The Dynamics of the Earth: Anaximander, Plato, and the Centrifocal Theory”, in Cosmic Problems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–26.Google Scholar

Galileo (1933), Il Saggiatore [1623], in Opere di Galileo Galilei, Vol. VI, ed. by Favaro, A, Florence: G. Barbèra.Google Scholar

Garber, Dan (1992), Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gentzen, Gerhard (1969), “Investigations into Logical Deduction”, in The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, ed. by Szabo, M. E, Amsterdam and London: North Holland.Google Scholar

Gill, Mary Louise (1984), “Aristotle on the Individuation of Change”, Ancient Philosophy 4:1, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar

Gill, Mary Louise (2003), “Aristotle’s Distinction between Change and Activity”, in Process Theories: Crossdisciplinary Studies in Dynamic Categories, ed. by Seibt, Johanna, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gill, Mary Louise (2016), “Method and Metaphysics in Plato’s Sophist and Statesman”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Zalta, Edward N, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/plato-sophstate/.Google Scholar

Glenn, S. (2011), “Proportion and Mathematics in Plato’s Timaeus”, Hermathena 190, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar

Gomperz, Theodor (1912), The Greek Thinkers, Vol. IV, London: J. Murray.Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. (1999), “Empedocles and Anaxagoras: Responses to Parmenides,” in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. by Long, A. A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–80.Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. (2006), Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition in Scientific Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gregory, Andrew (2000), Plato’s Philosophy of Science, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Gregory, Andrew (2013), “Leucippus and Democritus on Like to Like and ou mallon”, Apeiron 46, pp. 446–68.Google Scholar

Gregory, Andrew (2016), Anaximander: A Re-Assessment, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, Adolf (1968), Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962–81), History of Greek Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965), History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. II: The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hager, F. P. (1984), “Natur”, in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, 6, ed. by Ritter, Joachim, Basel and Stuttgart: Schwabe, pp. 421–41.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2001), Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Harte, Verity (2002), Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hatfield, Gary (1990), “Metaphysics and the New Science”, in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. by Lindberg, David and Westman, Robert, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–166.Google Scholar

Hasper, Pieter (2006), “Zeno Unlimited”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, pp. 49–85.Google Scholar

Hasse, Helmut and Scholz, Heinrich (1928), Die Grundlagenkrisis der griechischen Mathematik, Charlottenburg: Pan.Google Scholar

Heath, T. L. (1921), A History of Greek Mathematics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Heath, T. L. (1949), Mathematics in Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heinimann, Felix (1945), Nomos und Physis: Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts, Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt.Google Scholar

Herold, N. (1976), “Kontinuum, Kontinuität I and II”, in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, 4, ed. by Ritter, Joachim, Basel and Stuttgart: Schwabe, pp. 1044–58.Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jakkoo (1966), “Aristotelian Infinity”, Philosophical Review 75, pp. 197–218.Google Scholar

Horsten, Leon and Richard, Pettigrew (2014), The Bloomsbury Companion of Philosophical Logic, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Horn, Lawrence (2001), A Natural History of Negation, Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

Horn, Lawrence (2018), “Contradiction”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Zalta, Edward N, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/contradiction/.Google Scholar

Huby, Pamela M. (1973), “‘Concerning Nature’: Review of Peri Physeos: zur Frühgeschichte der Buchtitel by Egidius Schmalzriedt”, Classical Review 23:2, pp. 206–8.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence (1990), Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johansen, Thomas (2004), Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johansen, Thomas (2016), “Parmenides’ Likely Story”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar

Jones, Alexander (2019), “Greco-Roman Sundials: Precision and Displacement”, in Down to the Hour: Short Time in the Ancient Mediterranean and Near East, ed. by Miller, Kassandra and Symons, Sarah, Time, Astronomy, and Calendars, vol. 8, Leiden: Brill, pp. 125–57.Google Scholar

Jope, James (1972), “Subordinate Demonstrative Science in the Sixth Book of Aristotle’s Physics”, Classical Quarterly 22:2, pp. 279–92.Google Scholar

Judson, Lindsay (ed.) (1991), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (1966), The Greek Verb “To Be” and the Concept of Being, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (1969), “The Thesis of Parmenides”, Review of Metaphysics 22, pp. 700–24.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (1973), The Verb “Be” in Ancient Greek, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (1994), Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology, Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (2004), “Return to the Theory of the Verb to Be”, Ancient Philosophy 24, pp. 381–405.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (2009), “Parmenides and Plato Once More”, in Essays on Being, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 192–206.Google Scholar

Karfik, Filip (2004), Die Beseelung des Kosmos, Untersuchung zur Kosmologie, Seelenlehre und Theologie in Platons Phaidon und Timaios, Munich and Leipzig: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar

Kelsey, Sean (2003), “Aristotle’s Definition of Nature”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25, pp. 59–87.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1983), The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kneale, William and Kneale, Martha (1962), The Development of Logic, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Knorr, Wilbur (1990), “Plato and Eudoxus and the Planetary Motions”, Journal for the History of Astronomy 21, pp. 313–29.Google Scholar

Koyré, Alexandre (1968), “An Experiment in Measurement”, in Metaphysics and Measurement: Essays in Scientific Revolution, London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 89–117.Google Scholar

Krantz, David H., Luce, R. Duncan, Suppes, Patrick, and Tversky, Amos (2006), Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations, Mineola: Dover.Google Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman (1976), “Aristotle on the Instant of Change”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 50, pp. 91–114.Google Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman (1982), “Continuity, Contrariety, Contradiction, and Change”, in Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought, ed. by Kretzmann, Norman, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 270–96.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas (1985), The Copernican Revolution. Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kühner, Raphael and Gerth, Bernhard (1904), Ausführliche Grammatik der Griechischen Sprache, 3rd ed., Hanover and Leipzig: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Laraudogoitia, Jon Pérez (2016), “Supertasks”, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Zalta, Edward N., https://plato.stanford. edu/archives/spr2016/entries/spacetime-supertasks/.Google Scholar

Lear, Jonathan (1979–80), “Aristotelian Infinity”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 80, pp. 187–210.Google Scholar

Lear, Jonathan (1981), “A Note on Zeno’s Arrow”, Phronesis 26, pp. 91–104.Google Scholar

Lear, Jonathan (1982), “Aristotle’s Philosophy of Mathematics”, Philosophical Review 91, pp. 161–92.Google Scholar

Ledermann, Harvey (2014), “Ho pote on esti and Coupled Entities: A Form of Explanation in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 46, pp. 109–64.Google Scholar

Lee, David (2014), “Zeno’s Puzzle in Plato’s Parmenides”, Ancient Philosophy 34, pp. 255–73.Google Scholar

Lee, Edward N. (1972), “Plato on Negation and Not-Being in the Sophist”, The Philosophical Review 81, pp. 267–304.Google Scholar

Leigh, Fiona (2008), “The Copula and Semantic Continuity in Plato’s Sophist”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34, pp. 105–21.Google Scholar

Lesher, James (2008), “The Humanizing of Knowledge in Presocratic Thought”, in The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. by Patricia, Curd and Daniel, Graham, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 458–84.Google Scholar

Lewis, Frank A. (1977), “Plato on ‘Not’”, California Studies in Classical Antiquity 9, pp. 89–115.Google Scholar

Liddell, Henry George and Scott, Robert (1968), A Greek-English Lexicon, revised and augmented throughout by Sir Henry Stuart Jones, with a supplement, 9th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1978), “Saving the Appearances”, in Classical Quarterly 28:1, pp. 202–22.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987), Revolutions of Wisdom, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991), “Saving the Appearances II”, in Methods and Problems in Greek Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 248–77.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1963), “The Principles of Parmenides’ Cosmogony”, Phronesis 8, pp. 90–107.Google Scholar

Łukasiewicz, Jan (1910), “Über den Satz des Widerspruchs bei Aristoteles”, Bulletin International de l’Académie des sciences de Cracovie, Classe de philologie, classe de d’histoire et de philosophie, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar

Macé, Arnaud (2012), “La Naissance de la Nature en Grèce ancienne”, in Anciens et modernes par-delà nature et société, ed. by Haber, Stéphane and Macé, Arnaud, Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté, pp. 47–84.Google Scholar

Macé, Arnaud (2013), “L’invention de la Nature en Grèce ancienne”, unpublished mémoire d’habilitation, Sorbonne, Paris, 15 November 2013.Google Scholar

Makin, Stephen (1988), “How Can We Find Out What Ancient Philosophers Said?”, Phronesis 33, pp. 121–32.Google Scholar

Makin, Stephen (1993), Indifference Arguments, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Makin, Stephen (1998), “Zeno of Elea”, in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.rep.routledge.com/articles/biographical/zeno-of-elea-fl-c-450-bc/v-1.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, Jaap (1964), Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die Menschliche Welt, Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, Jaap. (1999), “Sources”, in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. by Long, A. A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–44.Google Scholar

Martens, Rhonda (2003), “A Commentary on Genesis, Plato’s Timaeus and Kepler’s Astronomy”, in Plato’s Timaeus as Cultural Icon, ed. by Reydams-Schils, G, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 251–66.Google Scholar

Mates, Ben (1979), “Identity and Predication in Plato”, Phronesis 24, pp. 211–29.Google Scholar

McKirahan, Richard (2001), “Anaximander’s Infinite Worlds”, in Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy VI: Before Plato, ed. by Preus, A, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 49–65.Google Scholar

McKirahan, Richard (2008), “Signs and Arguments in Parmenides B8”, in The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. by Patricia, Curd and Daniel, Graham, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–229.Google Scholar

McKirahan, Richard (2011), Philosophy before Socrates, 2nd ed., Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak and Lin, Martin (2016), “Principle of Sufficient Reason”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Zalta, Edward N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/sufficient-reason/.Google Scholar

Mendell, Henry (1998), “Making Sense of Aristotelian Demonstration”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16, pp. 161–225.Google Scholar

Mendell, Henry (2000), “The Trouble with Eudoxus”, in Ancient and Medieval Traditions in the Exact Sciences, Essays in Memory of Wilbur Knorr, ed. by Suppes, Patrick, Moravcsik, Julius, and Mendell, Henry, Stanford: CSLI, pp. 59–135.Google Scholar

Mendell, Henry (2004), “Aristotle and Mathematics”, in Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, ed. by Zalta, Edward N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/aristotle-mathematics/.Google Scholar

Mendell, Henry (2007), “Two Traces of a Two-Step Eudoxian Proportion Theory in Aristotle: A Tale of Definitions in Aristotle, with a Moral”, Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 61:1, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar

Mendell, Henry (2009), “Plato by the Numbers”, in Logos and Language: Essays in Honour of Julius Moravcsik, ed. by Follesdal, Dagfinn and Woods, John, London: College Publications, pp. 125–60.Google Scholar

Mendell, Henry Democritus on Mathematical and Physical Shapes and the Emergence of Fifth-Century Geometry, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Menn, Stephen (2018), “Eudoxus’ Theory of Proportion and His Method of Exhaustion”, in Logic, Philosophy of Mathematics, and Their History: Essays in Honor of W. W. Tait, ed. by Reck, Erich, London: College Publications, pp. 185–230.Google Scholar

Menn, Stephen The Aim and the Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Miller, Fred (1982), “Aristotle against the Atomists”, in Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought, ed. by Kretzmann, Norman, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 87–111.Google Scholar

Mittelstrass, J. (1962), Die Rettung der Phänomene, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mohr, Richard (1986), “Plato on Time and Eternity”, Ancient Philosophy 6, pp. 39–46.Google Scholar

Moorhouse, A. C. (1962), “ΔΕΝ in Classical Greek”, The Classical Quarterly 12, pp. 235–8.Google Scholar

Moore, A. W. (2001), The Infinite, 2nd ed., London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Morison, Benjamin (2013), “Aristotle on Primary Time in Physics 6”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45, pp. 149–93.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, Alexander (1970), The Route of Parmenides, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, Alexander (2010), “The Epistemological Section (29b–d) of the Proem in Timaeus’ Speech: M. F. Burnyeat on eikôs mythos, and a Comparison with Xenophanes B34 and B35”, in One Book, the Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today, ed. by Mohr, Richard and Sattler, Barbara, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, pp. 225–47.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, Alexander (2011), “Parmenides, Early Greek Astronomy, and Modern Scientific Realism”, in Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. by Cordero, Néstor-Luis, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, pp. 167–89.Google Scholar

Mueller, Ian (1970), “Aristotle on Geometrical Objects”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 52, pp. 156–71.Google Scholar

Mueller, Ian (1981), Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure in Euclid’s Elements, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Naddaf, Gérard (2008), Le concept de nature chez les présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Nehamas, Alexander (1981), “On Parmenides’ Three Ways of Inquiry”, Deucalion 33–4, pp. 97–111.Google Scholar

Netz, Reviel (2002), “Did Plato Have a Philosophy of Science? A Discussion of Andrew Gregory, Plato’s Philosophy of Science”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23, pp. 247–63.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Denis (1967), “Anaximander’s Measurements”, Classical Quarterly 17, pp. 423–32.Google Scholar

Odzuck, Sebastian (2014), The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRef Google Scholar

Osborne, Catherine (2006), “Was There an Eleatic Revolution in Philosophy?”, in Rethinking Revolutions through Ancient Greece, ed. by Goldhill, Simon and Osborne, Robin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 218–45.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1957–58), “Zeno and the Mathematicians”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58, pp. 199–222.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1960), “Eleatic Questions”, Classical Quarterly 10, pp. 84–102.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1966), “Plato and Parmenides on the Timeless Present”, Monist 50, pp. 317–40.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1970), “Plato on Not-Being”, in Plato I: Metaphysics and Epistemology, ed. by Vlastos, Gregory, Garden City: Anchor Books, pp. 223–67.Google Scholar

Palmer, John (1999), Plato’s Reception of Parmenides, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, John (2009), Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, John (2016), “Parmenides”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Zalta, Edward N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/parmenides/.Google Scholar

Pape, Wilhelm (1880), Altgriechisches Wörterbuch, Berlin: Braunschweig.Google Scholar

Pariente, Jean-Claude (1985), L’analyse du langage à Port-Royal, Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Price, H. (1990), “Why ‘Not’?”, Mind 99, pp. 221–38.Google Scholar

Pritchard, Paul (1995), Plato’s Philosophy of Mathematics, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

Rapp, Christof (1993), “Aristoteles über die Rechtfertigung des Satzes vom Widerspruch”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 47:4, pp. 521–41.Google Scholar

Rapp, Christof (2006), “Zeno and the Eleatic Anti-Pluralism”, in La costruzione del discurso filosofico nell’età det Presocratici, ed. by Sassi, M. M, Pisa: Edizione della Normale, pp. 161–82.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, Karl (1916), Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie, Bonn: F. Cohen.Google Scholar

Resnik, Michael (1997), Mathematics as a Science of Patterns, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ripley, David (2011), “Negation, Denial, and Rejection”, Philosophy Compass, 6, pp. 622–9.Google Scholar

Roark, Tony (2011), Aristotle on Time: A Study of the Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, Richard (1971), “Plato’s Separation of Reason from Desire”, Phronesis 16:1, pp. 38–48.Google Scholar

Rosen, Jacob (2015), “Physics V–VI versus VIII: Unity of Change and Disunity in the Physics”, in Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, ed. Leunissen, Mariska, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–24.Google Scholar

Rowett, Catherine (2013), “Philosophy’s Numerical Turn: Why the Pythagoreans’ Interest in Numbers Is Truly Awesome”, in Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras, ed. by Sider, David and Dirk, Obbink, De Gruyter, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar

Runia, David (2008), “The Sources for Presocratic Philosophy”, in Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. by Curd, Patricia and Graham, Daniel, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–54.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand (1945), A History of Western Philosophy, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand (1970), “The Problem of Infinity Considered Historically”, in Zeno’s Paradoxes, ed. by Salmon, Wesley C, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, pp. 45–58.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand (1972), The Principles of Mathematics, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert (1939), “Plato’s Parmenides,” Mind 48, pp. 129–51, 302–25.Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley C. (1970), Zeno’s Paradoxes, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley C. (1980), Space, Time and Motion: A Philosophical Introduction, 2nd, rev. ed., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, Jonathan (2007), “From Nihilism to Monism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85:2, pp. 175–91.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2010), “A Time for Learning and for Counting: Egyptians, Greeks and Empirical Processes in Plato’s Timaeus”, in One Book, the Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today, ed. by Mohr, Richard and Sattler, Barbara, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, pp. 249–66.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2011), “Parmenides’ System: The Logical Origins of his Monism”, in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. XXVI ed. by Gurtler, Gary M and Wians, William, Leiden and Boston: Brill, pp. 25–70.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2012), “A Likely Account of Necessity, Plato’s Receptacle as a Physical and Metaphysical Basis of Space”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 50, pp. 159–95.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2013), Review of Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. by Patricia Curd and Daniel Graham, Ancient Philosophy 33, pp. 187–93.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2014), Review of John Palmer, Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy, Classical World 107:3, pp. 421–3.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2015), “Time Is Double the Trouble: Zeno’s Moving Rows”, Ancient Philosophy 35:1, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2016), “Von der Bewegung himmlischer zu der irdischer Körper – Die wissenschaftliche Erfassung physischer Bewegung in der griechischen Antike”, in ΣΩΜΑ. Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der antiken Philosophie und Literatur, ed. by Buchheim, Thomas, Wachsmann, Nora, and Meißner, David, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, pp. 437–54.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2017a), “Aristotle’s Measurement Dilemma”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 52, pp. 257–301.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2017b), “How Natural Is a Unified Notion of Time? Temporal Experience in Early Greek Thought”, in The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Temporal Experience, ed. by Phillips, Ian, London and New York: Routledge, 2017, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2018a), “Sufficient Reason in the Phaedo and its Presocratic Antecedents”, in Plato’s Phaedo: Selected Papers from the Eleventh Symposium Platonicum, ed. by Cornelli, Gabriele, Bravo, Francisco, and Robinson, Tom, International Plato Studies, St. Augustin: Academia Verlag, pp. 239–48.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2018b), “Measurement and Scales in Aristotle”, Insights e-Journal 10:16, www.dur.ac.uk/ias/insights/volume10/article16/.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2019a), “The Notion of Continuity in Parmenides”, in Philosophical Inquiry 43:1–2, pp. 40–53.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2019b), “The Labours of Zeno – a Supertask?”, Ancient Philosophy Today: DIALOGOI 1, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2019c), “Time and Space in Plato’s Parmenides”, Etudes Platoniciennes 15, https://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/1717.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (forthcoming), “From the Object to the Subject: Plato’s Version of the Principle of Non-Contradiction in Republic IV”, in Re-Reading Plato’s Republic, ed. by McCabe, M. M. and Trépanier, S, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara Ancient Notions of Time from Homer to Plato, book manuscript in progress.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara “Reconstructing Zeno’s Fourth Paradox of Motion”, submitted article.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara Conceptions of Space in Ancient Greek Thought, book manuscript in preparation for CUP.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara “Thinking Makes the World Go Round: Intellection and Astronomy in Plato’s Timaeus”, unpublished article.Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara “What Is Doing the Explaining? An Atomistic Idea”, unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Schibli, H. S. (1996), “On the One in Philolaus, Fragment 7”, Classical Quarterly 46:1, pp. 114–30.Google Scholar

Schmalzriedt, Egidius (1970), Peri physeōs: Zur Frühgeschichte des Buchtitels, Munich: Fink.Google Scholar

Schofield, Malcom (2002), “Leucippus, Democritus and the οὐ μα̑λλον Principle: An Examination of Theophrastus ‘Phys. Op.’ Fr. 8”, Phronesis 47, pp. 253–63.Google Scholar

Sedley, David (1982), “Two Conceptions of Vacuum”, Phronesis 27:2, pp. 175–93.Google Scholar

Sedley, David (1992), “Sextus Empiricus and the Atomist Criteria of Truth”, Elenchos 13, pp. 21–56.Google Scholar

Sedley, David (1998), “Platonic Causes”, Phronesis 43, pp. 114–32.Google Scholar

Sedley, David (2007), Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Sedley, David (2008), “Atomism’s Eleatic Roots”, in The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. by Curd, Patricia and Graham, Daniel, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 305–32.Google Scholar

Sedley, David (2017), “Zenonian Strategies”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 53, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar

Silverman, Allan (2002), The Dialectic of Essence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sisko, John and Weiss, Yale (2015), “A Fourth Alternative in Interpreting Parmenides”, Phronesis 60, pp. 40–59.Google Scholar

Smith, A.M. (1981), “Saving the Appearances of the Appearances: The Foundations of Classical Geometrical Optics”, Archiv for the History of the Exact Sciences 24, pp. 73–99.Google Scholar

Smith, Robin (2002), “Ancient Greek Philosophical Logic”, in A Companion to Philosophical Logic, ed. by Jacquette, Dale, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar

Smyth, H. W. (1956), Greek Grammar, rev. by Messing, G. M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Solmsen, Friedrich (1960), Aristotle’s System of the Physical World: A Comparison with his Predecessors, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Solmsen, Friedrich (1971), “The Evidence about Zeno Re-Examined”, Phronesis 16:1, pp. 116–41.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard (1980), Necessity, Cause and Blame, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

(1983), Time, Creation and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard (1988), Matter, Space, and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and their Sequel, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Stenzel, Julius (1933), Zahl und Gestalt bei Platon und Aristoteles, Leipzig and Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar

Stokes, Michael (1971), One and Many in Presocratic Philosophy, Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar

Strobach, Niko (1998), The Moment of Change: A Systematic History in the Philosophy of Space and Time, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Suppes, Patrick (2000), “Measurement, Theory of”, in Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Craig, Edward, London: Routledge, pp. 549–50.Google Scholar

Tannery, Paul (1930), Pour l’histoire de la science hellène. De Thalès à Empédocle, 2nd ed., Paris: Gauthier-Villars et Cie.Google Scholar

Taylor, Richard. (1951), “Mr Black on Temporal Paradoxes”, Analysis 12:2, pp. 38–44.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. C. W. (2007), “Nomos and Phusis in Democritus and Plato”, Social Philosophy and Policy 24:2, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Thomson, J. F. (1954), “Tasks and Supertasks”, Analysis 15, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Überweg, Friedrich (2004), Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, Vol. 3, ed. by Flashar, Hellmut, Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar

Überweg, Friedrich (1983–2018), Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar

Unguru, Sabetai (1975), “On the Need to Rewrite the History of Greek Mathematics”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 15, pp. 67–114.Google Scholar

Verdenius, Willem Jacob (1942), Parmenides, Some Comments on his Poem, trans. by A. Fontein, Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory (1969), “Reasons and Causes in the Phaedo”, The Philosophical Review 78, pp. 291–325.Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory (1973), Platonic Studies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory (1975a), “Zeno’s Race Course”, in Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, Vol. II: The Eleatics and Pluralists, ed. by Allen, R. E. and Furley, David J., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 201–20.Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory (1975b), “A Note on Zeno’s Arrow”, in Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, Vol. II: The Eleatics and Pluralists, ed. Allen, R. E. and Furley, David J., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 184–200.Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory (1975c), Plato’s Universe, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory (1995), “Creation in the Timaeus: Is It a Fiction?”, in Studies in Greek Philosophy, Vol. II: Socrates, Plato, and Their Tradition, ed. by Graham, Daniel W., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

von Fritz, Kurt (1970), “The Discovery of Incommensurability by Hippasus of Metapontum”, in Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, Vol. 1: The Beginnings of Philosophy, ed. by Furley, David J. and Allen, R. E, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 382–412.Google Scholar

Waschkies, Hans-Joachim (1977), Von Eudoxos zu Aristoteles, das Fortwirken der Eudoxischen Proportionstheorie in der Aristotelischen Lehre vom Kontinuum, Amsterdam: Grüner.Google Scholar

Waterhouse, W. C. (1972–3), “The Discovery of the Regular Solids”, Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 9, pp. 212–21.Google Scholar

Waterlow, Sarah (1982), Nature, Change and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Waterlow, Sarah (1984), “Aristotle´s Now”, Philosophical Quarterly 34, pp. 104–28.Google Scholar

Watling, John (1952), “The Sum of an Infinite Series”, Analysis 13, pp. 39–46.Google Scholar

Wedin, Michael (2004), “Aristotle on the Firmness of the Principle of Non-Contradiction”, Phronesis 49:3, pp. 225–65.Google Scholar

Weidemann, Hermann (2017), “Potentiality and Actuality of the Infinite: A Misunderstood Passage in Aristotle’s Metaphysics (Θ.6, 1048b14-17)”, Phronesis 62, pp. 210–25.Google Scholar

Weyl, Hermann (1949), Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

White, Michael (1992), The Continuous and the Discrete: Ancient Physical Theories from a Contemporary Perspective, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

White, Stephen A. (2008), “Milesian Measures: Time, Space, and Matter”, in Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. by Curd, Patricia and Graham, Daniel, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–133.Google Scholar

Wieland, Wolfgang (1962), Die aristotelische Physik. Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaft und die sprachlichen Bedingungen der Prinzipienforschung bei Aristoteles, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, Ulrich von (1899), “Lesefrüchte”, Hermes 34, pp. 204–5.Google Scholar

Williamson, Timothy (1998), “Identity”, in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/identity/v-1.Google Scholar

Yavetz, Ido (2003), “On Simplicius’ Testimony Regarding Eudoxan Lunar Theory”, Science in Context 16:3, pp. 319–29.Google Scholar

Zhmud, Leonid (1998), “Plato as Architect of Science”, Phronesis 43, pp. 211–44.Google Scholar

Zeller, Eduard (1879), Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Vol. II, 3rd ed., Leipzig: R. Reisland.Google Scholar

Zeyl, Donald (2014), “Plato’s Timaeus”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Zalta, Edward N, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/plato-timaeus/.Google Scholar