Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-n2sc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-03T23:42:36.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Anthropological approaches to conservation conflicts

from PART II - Contrasting disciplinary approaches to the study of conflict in conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

By
Andrew Whitehouse
Edited by
Stephen M. Redpath ,
R. J. Gutiérrez ,
Kevin A. Wood  and
Juliette C. Young
Andrew Whitehouse
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Stephen M. Redpath
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
R. J. Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Kevin A. Wood
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Juliette C. Young
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Get access

Summary

Conservation is a relational practice. Thus, it is commonly supposed that nature conservation is primarily concerned with nature, particularly nature in the sense of that which is external to human society. Following this model, which is somewhat redolent of the ‘Platonic cave’ (i.e. the conceptualisation of society as existing in the political world of ‘the cave’ away from the external world of nature, which can only come to be known via the specialist techniques of science or philosophy; see Latour, 2004), conservation has been dominated by the natural sciences, particularly ecology, in assessing the work that needs doing and how best it might be achieved. The potential contribution of the social sciences has arguably been perceived as limited to providing insights into the ‘human dimensions’ for example, by helping to incorporate the interests of ‘local people’ and other ‘stakeholders’ into the management plans that have already been developed by conservationists. They have dealt with the politics of ‘the cave’ and the natural scientists have ventured into the world of nature to find out what is going on there before returning to society to explain what needs to be done.

While this is an illustrative simplification, social science has largely been subservient to natural science in the development of conservation. The reasons for this, I argue, arise from conservation being conceptualised as the management of a detached nature that is understood by means of natural science. When one analyses the practice of conservation, it soon becomes clear that it is an activity that is less about people mastering a detached nature than about assessing how best to regulate human activities in relation to their environment. This shift in emphasis, from conservation as an understanding of nature and its management to conservation as primarily about human activity in relation to the environment, still demands the skills of natural scientists, but places the social sciences much more at the heart of conservationist endeavours.

Type
Chapter
Information
Conflicts in Conservation
Navigating Towards Solutions
 , pp. 94 - 107
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arce, A. and Long, N. (1993). Bridging two worlds: an ethnography of bureaucrat–peasant relations in western Mexico. In An Anthropological Critique of Development, ed. Hobart, M., pp. 179–208. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Argyrou, V. (2005). The Logic of Environmentalism: Anthropology, Ecology and Postcoloniality. Oxford: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, E. (1998). Knowing Nature, Knowing Science: An Ethnography of Environmental Activism. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
Berglund, E. and Anderson, D. (2003). Introduction: towards an ethnography of ecological underprivilege. In Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege, eds. Berglund, E. and Anderson, D., pp. 1–15. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Bird-David, N. (1990). The giving environment: another perspective on the economic system of gatherer-hunters. Curr. Anthropol., 31, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockington, D. (2002). Fortress Conservation: The Preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. (2005). Introduction: changing protection policies and ethnographies of environmental engagement. Conserv. Soc., 3, 280–322.Google Scholar
Candea, M. (2010). ‘I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat’: engagement and detachment in human–animal relations. Am. Ethnol., 37, 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Descola, P. and Palsson, G. (1996). Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einarsson, N. (1993). All animals are equal but some are cetaceans: conservation and culture conflict. In Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology, ed. Milton, K., pp. 73–84. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellen, R. and Fukui, K. (1996). Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture and Domestication. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. M. (2003). Promoting consumption in the rainforest. In Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege, eds. Berglund, E. and Anderson, D., pp. 119–137. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (1999). After nature: steps to an anti-essentialist political ecology. Curr. Anthropol., 40, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatt, C. (2011). Becoming Friends of the Earth: an anthropology of global environmentalism. Unpublished thesis, University of Aberdeen.
Gatt, C. (2013). Enlivening the supra-personal actor: vectors at work in a transnational environmentalist federation. Anthropol. Action, 20, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. (1977). Cannibals and Kings. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Helmreich, S. (2009). Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hobart, M. (1993). Introduction: the growth of ignorance? In An Anthropological Critique of Development, ed. Hobart, M., pp. 1–30. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M., et al. (2010). The impact of conservation on the status of the world's vertebrates. Science, 330, 1503–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. (1996). Nature in culture or culture in nature? Chewing ideas of ‘humans’ and other species. In Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives, eds. Descola, P. and Palsson, G., pp. 127–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2005). Epilogue: towards a politics of dwelling. Conserv. Soc., 3, 501–508.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krause, F. (2010). Thinking like a river: an anthropology of water and its uses along the Kemi River, Northern Finland. Unpublished thesis, University of Aberdeen.
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, C. (2006). Wild Profusion: Biodiversity Conservation in an Indonesian Archipelago. Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milton, K. (1993). Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, K. (1996). Environmentalism and Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, K. (2000). Ducks out of water: nature conservation as boundary maintenance. In Natural Enemies: People–Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective, ed. Knight, J., pp. 229–246. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Novellino, D. (2003). Contrasting landscapes, conflicting ontologies: assessing environmental conservation on Palawan Island (The Philippines). In Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege, eds. Berglund, E. and Anderson, D., pp. 171–188. Oxford:Berghahn.Google Scholar
Nygren, A. (2003). Nature as contested terrain: conflicts over wilderness protection and local livelihoods in Rio San Juan, Nicaragua. In Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege, eds. Berglund, E. and Anderson, D., pp. 33–49. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Orlove, B. and Brush, S. (1996). Anthropology and the conservation of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 25, 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, R. (1967). Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, P. (1992). Saving the rain forest? Contested futures in conservation. In Contemporary Futures: Perspectives from Social Anthropology, ed. Wallman, S., pp. 138–153. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Satterfield, T. (2002). Anatomy of a Conflict: Identity, Knowledge, and Emotion in Old-Growth Forests. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Sillitoe, P. (1998). The development of indigenous knowledge: a new applied anthropology. Curr. Anthropol., 39, 223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, J. (1955). Theory of Culture Change: The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Theodossopoulos, D. (2003). Troubles with Turtles: Cultural Understandings of the Environment on a Greek Island. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. (1994). A Phenomenology of Landscape. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. (2005). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeteon: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vivanco, L. (2006). Green Encounters: Shaping and Contesting Environmentalism in Rural Costa Rica. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, A. (2004). Negotiating small differences: conservation organisations and farming in Islay. Unpublished thesis, University of St Andrews.
Whitehouse, A. (2009). ‘A disgrace to a farmer’: conservation and agriculture on a nature reserve in Islay, Scotland. Conserv. Soc., 7, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, A. (2012). How the land should be: narrating progress on farms in Islay, Scotland. In Landscapes Beyond Land: Routes, Aesthetics, Narratives, eds. Arnason, A., Ellison, N., Vergunst, J. and Whitehouse, A., pp. 160–177. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Wishart, R. (2004). A story about a muskox: some implications of Tetlit Gwich'in human–animal relationships. In Cultivating Arctic Landscapes: Knowing and Managing Animals in the Circumpolar North, eds. Anderson, D. and Nuttall, M., pp. 79–92. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×