Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T05:22:56.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Connectivity and wide-ranging species in the ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

By
Autumn-Lynn Harrison  and
Karen A. Bjorndal
Edited by
Kevin R. Crooks  and
M. Sanjayan
Kevin R. Crooks
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
M. Sanjayan
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Virginia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

On land, the study of connectivity grew chiefly from the desire to conserve migratory routes and extensive home ranges of large wide-ranging of mammals. These charismatic animals served as the basis for an expanding and influential branch of conservation biology. The marine analogues of the wildebeest of the plains and the wolves of Yellowstone National Park are the wide-ranging creatures of the sea – cetaceans (whales and dolphins), elasmobranchs (sharks and rays), pinnipeds (seals and sea lions), sea turtles, and large migratory teleost fish such as tuna. Single migration events of these species range from hundreds to tens of thousands of kilometers (Alerstam et al. 2003) and patterns of connectivity between populations and between habitats of these organisms provide a distinct interpretation of connectivity among large animal populations.

Connectivity is dependent upon the lens with which the landscape (or seascape) is viewed and upon how the seascape is functionally treated by the species in question (Taylor 1993; Tischendorf and Fahrig 2000; Crooks and Suarez Chapter 18). The view from the eye of a tuna, whale, or sea turtle differs substantially from that of their terrestrial counterparts. Likewise, patterns of connectivity for wide-ranging species in the ocean can differ from those of other marine species such as algae, coral, and reef fish. Larval transport and reef fish connectivity are the subject of an extensive body of research and are thus treated separately in this volume (DiBacco et al. Chapter 8).

Type
Chapter
Information
Connectivity Conservation , pp. 213 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, J. J., Godley, B. J., Broderick, A. C., et al. 2001. Two hundred years after a commercial marine turtle fishery: the current status of marine turtles nesting in the Cayman Islands. Oryx 35:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alerstam,T., A. T., A., and Åkesson, S.. 2003. Long-distance migration: evolution and determinants. Oikos 103:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, L. A., and Witzell, W. N.. 2000. Demographic composition of immature green turtles (Chelonia mydas) from the east central Florida coast: evidence from mtDNA markers. Herpetologica 56:357–367Google Scholar
Bass, A. L., Lagueux, C. J., and Bowen, B. W.. 1998. Origin of green turtles, Chelonia mydas, at “sleeping rocks” off the northeast coast of Nicaragua. Copeia 1998:1064–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorndal, K. A. 1997. Foraging ecology and nutrition of sea turtles. Pp. 199–231 in Lutz, P. L., and Musick, J. A. (eds.) The Biology of Sea Turtles. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bjorndal, K. A., Bolten, A. B., Dellinger, T., Delgado, C., and Martins, H. R.. 2003a. Compensatory growth in oceanic loggerhead sea turtles: response to a stochastic environment. Ecology 84:1237–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorndal, K. A., Bolten, A. B., and Chaloupka, M. Y.. 2003b. Survival probability estimates for immature green turtles, Chelonia mydas, in the Bahamas. Marine Ecology – Progress Series 252:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, B. A. 2005. Physiological ecology in the 21st century: advancements in biologging science. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45:305–320CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, B. A., Dewar, H., Blackwell, S. B., et al. 2001. Migratory movements, depth preferences, and thermal biology of Atlantic bluefin tuna. Science. 293:1310–1314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, B. A., Costa, D. P., Boehlert, G. W., and Kochevar, R. E.. 2003. Revealing pelagic habitat use: the Tagging of Pacific Pelagics program. Oceanologica Acta 25:255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, B. A., Teo, S. L., Walli, A., et al. 2005. Electronic tagging and population structure of Atlantic bluefin tuna. Nature 434:1121–1127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolten, A. B. 2003a. Variation in sea turtle life history patterns: neritic vs. oceanic developmental stages. Pp. 243–257 in P. L. Lutz, J. Musick, and J. Wyneken (eds.) The Biology of Sea Turtles, vol. 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Bolten, A. B. 2003b. Active swimmers – passive drifters: the oceanic juvenile stage of loggerheads in the Atlantic system. Pp. 63–78 in A. B. Bolten, and B. E. Witherington (eds.) Loggerhead Sea Turtles. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Bolten, A. B., and K. A. Bjorndal. 2003. Green turtles in the Bahamas: a shared resource. Pp. 225–226 in Ray, G. C., and McCormick-Ray, J. (eds.) Coastal–Marine Conservation: Science and Policy. London: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Bolten, A. B., and Chaloupka, M.. 2004. West Atlantic Green Turtle Population Modeling Workshop. Marine Turtle Newsletter 103:17.Google Scholar
Bolten, A. B., Bjorndal, K. A., Martins, H. R., et al. 1998. Transatlantic developmental migrations of loggerhead sea turtles demonstrated by mtDNA sequence analysis. Ecological Applications 8:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, S. S., and Bjorndal, K. A.. 2000. Sea turtles as biological transporters of nutrients and energy from marine to terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology 81:2305–2313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, B. W. 1995. Molecular genetic studies of marine turtles. Pp. 585–587 in K. A. Bjorndal (ed.) Biology and Conservation of Sea Turtles, rev. edn. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Bowen, B. W., and S. A. Karl. 1997. Population genetics, phylogeography, and molecular evolution. Pp. 29–50 in (Lutz, P. L., and Musick, J. A. (eds.) The Biology of Sea Turtles. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bowen, B. W., A. B. Meylan, J. P. Ross, et al. 1992. Global population structure and natural history of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) in terms of matriarchal phylogeny. Evolution 46:865–881Google ScholarPubMed
Bowen, B. W., F. A. Abreu-Grobois, G. H. Balazs, et al. 1995. Trans-Pacific migrations of the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) demonstrated with mitochondrial DNA markers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92:3731–3734CrossRef
Bowen, B. W., Bass, A. L., Garcia-Rodriguez, A., et al. 1996. Origin of hawksbill turtles in a Caribbean feeding area as indicated by genetic markers. Ecological Applications 6:566–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, D., C. Moritz, J. D. Miller, et al. 1994. Genetic studies of the hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata): evidence for multiple stocks in Australian waters. Pacific Conservation Biology 1:123–131CrossRef
Burton, R. K., and Koch, P. L.. 1999. Isotope tracking of foraging and long distance migration in northeast Pacific pinnipeds. Oecologia 119:578–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr,, A. 1967. So Excellent a Fishe: A Natural History Of Sea Turtles. New York: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Carr, A. 1975. The Ascension Island green turtle colony. Copeia 1975:547–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, A. 1986. Rips, FADS, and little loggerheads. BioScience 36:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, A., and Giovannoli, L.. 1957. The ecology and migrations of sea turtles. II. Results of field work in Costa Rica, 1955. American Museum Novitates 1835:1–32Google Scholar
Carr, A. F., Carr, M. H., and Meylan, A. B.. 1978. The ecology and migrations of sea turtles. VII. The West Caribbean green turtle colony. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 162:1–146Google Scholar
Carr, M. H., J. E. Neigel, J. A. Estes, et al. 2003. Comparing marine and terrestrial ecosystems: implications for the design of coastal marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13:S90–S107CrossRef
Curtis, J. T. 1956. The modification of mid-latitude grasslands and forests by man. Pp. 721–736 in Thomas, W. L. (ed.) Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Estes, J. A., Tinker, M. T., Williams, T. M.,, and Doak, D. F.. 1998. Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science 282:473–476CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferraroli, S., Georges, J. Y., Gaspar, P., and Maho, Y.. 2004. Where leatherback turtles meet fisheries. Nature 429:521–522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FitzSimmons, N. N., A. R. Goldizen, J. A. Norman, et al. 1997. Philopatry of male marine turtles inferred from mitochondrial markers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94:8912–8917CrossRef
Harrisson, T. 1956. The edible turtle (Chelonia mydas) in Borneo. V. Tagging turtles (and why). Sarawak Museum Journal 7:504–515Google Scholar
Hatase, H., N. Takai, Y. Matsuzawa, et al. 2002. Size-related differences in feeding habitat use of adult female loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta around Japan determined by stable isotope analyses and satellite telemetry. Marine Ecology – Progress Series 233:273–281CrossRef
Hays, G. C., Houghton, J. D. R., and Myers, A. E.. 2004. Pan-Atlantic leatherback turtle movements. Nature 429:522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, K. N., S. M. Kajiura, D. G. Itano, and J. Sibert. 2001. Tagging techniques can elucidate the biology and exploitation of aggregated pelagic fish species. Pp. 211–218 in Sedberry, G. R. (ed.) Island in the Stream: Oceanography and Fisheries of the Charleston Bump. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
Hykle, D. 2002. The Convention on Migratory Species and other international instruments relevant to marine turtle conservation: pros and cons. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 5:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyrenbach, K. D., Forney, K. A., and Dayton, P. K.. 2000. Marine protected areas and ocean basin management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 10:437–4583.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., M. X. Kirby, W. H. Berger, et al. 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–638CrossRef
Lahanas, P. N., K. A. Bjorndal, A. B. Bolten, et al. 1998. Genetic composition of a green turtle (Chelonia mydas) feeding ground population: evidence for multiple origins. Marine Biology 130:345–352CrossRef
Laurent, L., P. Casale, M. N. Bradai, et al. 1998. Molecular resolution of marine turtle stock composition in fishery bycatch: a case study in the Mediterranean. Molecular Ecology 7:1529–1542CrossRef
Limpus, C. J., and D. J. Limpus. 2003. Biology of the loggerhead turtle in western South Pacific Ocean foraging areas. Pp. 93–113 in Bolten, A. B., and Witherington, B. E. (eds.) Loggerhead Sea Turtles. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Limpus, C. J., Parmenter, C. J., Baker, V., and Fleay, A.. 1983. The flatback turtle, Chelonia depressa, in Queensland: post-nesting migration and feeding ground distribution. Australian Wildlife Research 10:557–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, K., Horrocks, J. A., LeRoux, R. A., and Dutton, P. H.. 2004. Origins of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) feeding aggregations around Barbados, West Indies. Marine Biology 144:799–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H., and Wilson, E. O.. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Magnuson, J. J., Block, B. A., Deriso, R. B., et al. 1994. An Assessment of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna, Committee to Review Atlantic Bluefin Tuna, Ocean Studies Board, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Meylan, P. A., Meylan, A. B., and Yeomans, R.. 1992. Interception of Tortuguero-bound green turtles at Bocas Del Toro Province, Panama. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Workshop on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation, Miami, FL, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFC-302, p. 74.Google Scholar
Moore, S. E., and Clarke, J. T.. 2002. Potential impact of offshore human activities on gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus). Journal of Cetacean Research Management 4:19–25Google Scholar
Morreale, S. J., Standora, E. A., Spotila, J. R., and Paladino, F. V.. 1996. Migration corridor for sea turtles. Nature 384:319–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, J. A. 1981. Feeding ecology of the West Caribbean green turtle (Chelonia mydas) in Nicaragua. Biotropica 13:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musick, J. A., and C. J. Limpus. 1997. Habitat utilization and migration in juvenile sea turtles. Pp. 137–163 in Lutz, P. L., and Musick, J. A. (eds.) Biology of Sea Turtles. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
National Marine Mammal Laboratory. 2006. Quarterly Research Report. Avaliable online at http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/Quarterly/CurrentIssue/default.htmGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 2001 Marine Protected Areas: Tools for Sustaining Ocean Ecosystems, NRC Committee on the Evaluation, Design, and Monitoring of Marine Reserves and Protected Areas in the United States; Ocean Studies Board; Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Orellana, C. 2004. Tropical seascape corridor planned. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, J. J. 1962. The Green Turtle and Man. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Piraino, S., Fanelli, S., and Boero, F.. 2002. Variability of species' roles in marine communities: change of paradigms for conservation priorities. Marine Biology 140:1067–1074Google Scholar
Plotkin, P. 2003. Adult migrations and habitat use. Pp. 225–241 in P. L. Lutz, J. Musick, and J. Wyneken (eds.) The Biology of Sea Turtles, vol. 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Reeves, R. R. 2000. The Value of Sanctuaries, Parks, and Reserves (Protected Areas) as Tools for Conserving Marine Mammals. Hudson, Ontario, Canada: Okapi Wildlife Associates. Available online at http://www.mmc.gov/reports/contract/pdf/mpareport.pdfGoogle Scholar
Reeves, R., Smith, T. D., Josephson, E. A., Clapham, P. J., and Woolmer, G.. 2004. Historical observations of humpback and blue whales in the North Atlantic Ocean: clues to migratory routes and possibly additional feeding grounds. Society for Marine Mammal Science 20:774–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. A., Schwartz, T. S., and Karl, S. A.. 2004. Global population genetic structure and male-mediated gene flow in the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas): analysis of microsatellite loci. Genetics 166:1857–1870CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schell, D. M., Saupe, S. M., and Haubenstock, N.. 1989. Natural isotope abundances in bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) baleen: markers of aging and habitat use. Ecological Studies 68:260–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, R. S., and Urban, D. L.. 2000. Spatial components of bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) distribution in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. CanadianJournal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:2193–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, A. M., J. A. Estes, G. B. van Vliet, et al. 2003. Sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific Ocean: an ongoing legacy of industrial whaling?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100:12223–12228CrossRef
Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., and Merriam, G.. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tischendorf, L., and Fahrig, L.. 2000. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, C. H. 1935. The distribution of certain whales as shown by logbook records of American whaleships. Zoologica 19:1–50Google Scholar
Van Blaricom, G. R., L. R. Gerber, and R. L. Brownell, Jr. 2000. Extinctions of marine mammals. Pp. 37–69 in Levin, S. A. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, vol. 4. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Walker, T. A., and Parmenter, C. J.. 1990. Absence of a pelagic phase in the life cycle of the flatback turtle, Natator depressa (Garman). Journal of Biogeography 17:275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, M. S., Marra, P. P., Haig, S. M., Bensch, S., and Holmes, R. T.. 2002. Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N. 1970. A History of the Cayman Islands. Grand Cayman: The Government of the Cayman Islands.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×