Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-m789k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T00:06:04.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Maintaining taxonomic skills; the decline of taxonomy – a threat to fish conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

By
Maria J. Collares-Pereira ,
Paul H. Skelton  and
Ian G. Cowx
Edited by
Gerard P. Closs ,
Martin Krkosek  and
Julian D. Olden
Maria J. Collares-Pereira
Affiliation:
University of Lisbon
Paul H. Skelton
Affiliation:
Rhodes University
Ian G. Cowx
Affiliation:
University of Hull
Gerard P. Closs
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Martin Krkosek
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Julian D. Olden
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Species, however defined, are the generally accepted unit of biology, including in conservation biology where it is more conventional to consider elements in terms of landscape units, ecosystems or communities (Mace, 2004). Here we consider how a general decline in systematics and taxonomy, the science dealing with the identification, description, naming and classifying of organisms, might affect fish conservation (Reid, 2010).

The link between species and conservation has many facets and implications, all of which have changed over time as the paradigms of both systems themselves have changed. The one constant that a ‘species’ has for conservation is that of linkage and communication, of being the instrument through which conservation issues are brought into a common understanding for different audiences. The iconic nature of certain species linked to conservation illustrates this point – giant pandas, rhinos, elephants, tigers, the blue whale or, more relevant to this chapter, species like golden trout, Atlantic salmon, sturgeon, Tennessee darter, coelacanth, Australian lungfish and Asian arowana – all have clear conservation connotations. In every case, the icon connects directly to an environment or ecosystem and threats to its existence, and critically to the human dimensions of its conservation needs. Were it not that fish and fisheries are of major economic and cultural importance (Welcomme et al., 2010), this situation might not be considered that serious, but fishes are key components of aquatic ecosystems and are both an essential food resource as well as a source of other products. They also play a major cultural role, from aesthetics to pets and leisure, in the lives of millions of people (Reid et al., 2013).

Their taxonomy is thus critical to recognise the threats to their existence and the steps required to conserve them. It is our contention, therefore, that conservation is all about ‘human’ concerns and actions, and, as such, taxonomy is a critical component in the process. A ‘taxonomic impediment’ (or insufficient taxonomic expertise) has been raised as a problem for understanding the extent of the biodiversity crisis that currently faces society. As represented in Figure 17.1, taxonomic capacity has been declining and conservation demand clearly increasing, particularly under obligations to international directives and conventions (e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio+20, the European Habitats and Water Framework Directives), and drives to protect landscapes and habitats.

Type
Chapter
Information
Conservation of Freshwater Fishes , pp. 535 - 562
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Advance Africa. (2013). Available at: www.advanceafrica.co.za/projects.htm.
Allan, J. D., Abell, R., Hogan, Z., et al. (2005). Overfishing of inland waters. BioScience, 55, 1041–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allendorf, F., Leary, R. F., Spruell, P. & Wenburg, J. K. (2001). The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arlinghaus, R., Mehner, T. & Cowx, I. G. (2002). Reconciling traditional inland fisheries management and sustainability in industrialised countries, with emphasis on Europe. Fish and Fisheries, 3, 261–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arlinghaus, R., Cooke, S. J. & Cowx, I. G. (2010). Providing context to the global code of practice for recreational fisheries. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 17, 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, J. P., Burdon, D., Elliott, M. & Gregory, A. J. (2011). Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, K. H. (1938). Description of a new species of fresh-water fish from Natal. Annals of the Natal Museum, 8, 525–528.Google Scholar
Bergsten, J., Bilton, D. T., Fujisawa, T., et al. (2012). The effect of geographical scale of sampling on DNA Barcoding. Systematic Biology, 61, 851–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardo, J. (2011). A critical appraisal of the meaning and diagnosability of cryptic evolutionary diversity, and its implications for conservation in the face of climate change. In Climate Change, Ecology and Systematics. Hodkinson, T. R., Jones, M. B., Waldren, S. & Parnell, J. A. N. (Eds). Cambridge University Press, pp. 380–438.Google Scholar
Boero, F. (2010). The study of species in the Era of Biodiversity: a tale of stupidity. Diversity, 2, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, M. R., Bockmann, F. A., Amorim, D. S., et al. (2005). Revisiting the taxonomic impediment. Science, 307, 353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, M. R., Bockmann, F. A., Amorim, D. S., et al. (2007). Taxonomic impediment or impediment to taxonomy? A commentary on systematic and the cybertaxonomic-automation paradigm. Evolutionary Biology, 34, 140–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, M. R., Bockmann, F. A., Amorim, D. S. & Brandão, C. R. F. (2008). Systematics must embrace comparative biology and evolution, not speed and automation. Evolutionary Biology, 35, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CBD (2000). Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at http://69.90.183.227/doc/legal/cbd-un-en.pdf/
Chakona, A. (2011). Comparative biogeography and ecology of freshwater fishes in the Breede and associated river systems, South Africa. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, C. A., Kaufman, L., Witte, F. & Balirwa, J. (2008). Biodiversity conservation in African inland waters: lessons of the Lake Victoria region. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie, 30, 16–34.Google Scholar
Collares-Pereira, M. J. & Cowx, I. G. (2004). The role of catchment scale environmental management in freshwater fish conservation. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 11, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collares-Pereira, M. J., Cowx, I. G. & Coelho, M. M. (Eds). (2002). Conservation of Freshwater Fishes: Options for the Future. Oxford: Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Collares-Pereira, M. J., Matos, I., Morgado-Santos, M. & Coelho, M. M. (2013). Natural pathways towards polyploidy in animals – the Squalius alburnoides fish complex as a model system to study genome size and genome reorganization in polyploids. In: Trends in Polyploidy Research in Animals and Plants. Stock, M. & Lamatsch, D. (Eds). Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 140, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, S. J. & Cowx, I. G. (2004). Considering recreational fisheries impacts in global fish crises. BioScience, 54, 857–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, M. J., May, R. M. & Stork, N. E. (2013a). Can we name Earth's species before they go extinct?Science, 339, 413–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costello, M. J., Bouchet, P., Boxshall, G., et al. (2013b). Global coordination and standardisation in marine biodiversity through the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and related databases. PLoS ONE, 8, e51629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costello, M. J., Wilson, S. & Houlding, B. (2013c). More taxonomists describing significantly fewer species per unit effort may indicate that most species have been discovered. Systematic Biology, 62, 616–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cotterill, F. P. D. (2002). The future of natural science collections into the 21st century. Conferencia de Clausura. In Actas del I Simposio sobre el Patrimonio Natural en las Colecciones Públicas en España (Vitoria, 25–27 September 2001). Vitoria: Departamento de Cultura, Diputacion Foral de Alava, pp. 237–282.Google Scholar
Cowx, I. G. (2002). Analysis of threats to freshwater fish conservation: past and present challenges. In Conservation of Freshwater Fish: Options for the Future. Collares-Pereira, M. J., Cowx, I. G. & Coelho, M. M. (Eds). Oxford: Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, pp. 201–220.Google Scholar
Cowx, I. G. & Collares-Pereira, M. J. (2002). Freshwater fish conservation: options for the future. In Conservation of Freshwater Fish: Options for the Future. Collares-Pereira, M. J., Cowx, I. G. & Coelho, M. M. (Eds). Oxford: Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, pp. 443–452.Google Scholar
Cowx, I. G. & Portocarrero, M. A. (2011). Paradigm shifts in fish conservation: moving to the ecosystem services concept. Journal of Fish Biology, 79, 1663–1680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowx, I. G., Arlinghaus, R. & Cooke, S. J. (2010). Harmonising recreational fisheries and conservation objectives for aquatic biodiversity in inland waters. Journal of Fish Biology, 76, 2194–2215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, K. A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Mace, G. M. & Wayne, R. K. (2000). Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 290–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danley, P. D., Husemann, M., Ding, B., et al. (2012). The impact of geologic history and paleoclimate on the diversification of East African cichlids. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Article ID 574851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deans, A. R., Yoder, M. J. & Balhoff, J. P. (2012). Time to change how we describe biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Queiroz, K. (2007). Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56, 879–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudgeon, D. (2010). Prospects for sustaining freshwater biodiversity in the 21st century: linking ecosystem structure and function. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., et al. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudgeon, D., Paugy, D., Leveque, C., Rebelo, L.-M. & McCartney, M. P. (2011). Background. In The diversity of life in African Freshwaters: Under Water, Under Threat. An analysis of the status and distribution of freshwater species throughout mainland Africa. Darwall, W. R. T., Smith, K. G., Allem, D. J., et al. (Eds). Cambridge, United Kingdom and Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Dugan, P. J., Barlow, C., Agostinho, A. A., et al. (2010). Fish migration, dams, and loss of ecosystem services in the Mekong basin. Ambio, 39, 344–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EUHD (1992). Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/habitatsdirective/indx_en.htm/
Filipe, A. F., Marques, T., Seabra, S., et al. (2004). Selection of priority areas for fish conservation in Guadiana River Basin, Iberian Peninsula. Conservation Biology, 18, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filipe, A. F., Araujo, M. B., Doadrio, I., Angermeir, P. & Collares-Pereira, M. J. (2009). Biogeography of Iberian freshwater fishes revisited: the roles of contemporary versus historical constraints. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 2096–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J., Ritchie, E. G. & Hanspach, J. (2012). Academia's obsession with quantity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 473–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D. J. & Bernatchez, L. (2001). Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Molecular Ecology, 10, 2741–2752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrow, C. & Marr, S. (2012). Swimming on the Edge of Extinction. Grahamstown, South Africa: NISC.Google Scholar
Getahun, A. (2011). A unique species flock in Lake Tana – the Labeobarbus complex. Species in the spotlight. In The Diversity of Life in African Freshwaters: Under Water, Under Threat. An Analysis of the Status and Distribution of Freshwater Species throughout Mainland Africa. Darwall, W. R. T., Smith, K. G., Allem, D. J., et al. (Eds). Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp. 82–84.Google Scholar
Goudswaard, P. C., Witte, F. & Katunzi, E. F. B. (2008). The invasion of an introduced predator, Nile perch (Lates niloticus, L.) in Lake Victoria (East Africa): chronology and causes. Environmental Biology of Fish, 81, 127–139.Google Scholar
Gozlan, R. E., Britton, J. R., Cowx, I. G. & Copp, G. H. (2010). Current knowledge on nonnative freshwater fish introductions. Journal of Fish Biology, 76, 751–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, P. H. (1992). Are the major fish faunas well-known?Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 42, 131–138.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. H. & Jubb, R. A. (1967). The generic identity of Labeo quathlambae Barnard (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums (Natural History), 6, 17–37.Google Scholar
Guerra-Garcia, J. M., Espinosa, F. & Garcia-Gomez, J. C. (2008). Trends in taxonomy today: an overview about the main topics in taxonomy. Zoology Baetica, 19, 15–49.Google Scholar
Impson, N. D., Marriott, M. S., Bills, I. R. & Skelton, P. H. (2007). Conservation biology and management of a critically endangered cyprinid, the Twee River redfin, Barbus erubescens (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 32, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN. (2012). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org.
Jablonka, E. & Raz, G. (2009). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 84, 131–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jubb, R. A. (1966). Labeo quathlambae, a rare freshwater fish now feared to be extinct. Piscator, 67, 78–80.Google Scholar
Kennish, M. J. (2002). Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environmental Conservation, 29, 78–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koonin, E. V. (2011). The Logic of Chance: The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press Science.Google Scholar
Kraus, F. (1995). The conservation of unisexual vertebrate populations. Conservation Biology, 9, 956–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krell, F. T. (2002). Why impact factors don't work for taxonomy. Nature, 415, 957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leidy, R. A. & Moyle, P. B. (1997). Conservation status of the world's fish fauna: an overview. In Conservation Biology for the Coming Decade. Fiedler, P. A. & Karieva, P. M. (Eds). New York, NY:Chapman and Hall, pp. 187–227.Google Scholar
Likens, G. E. & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2012). Integrating approaches leads to more effective conservation of biodiversity. Biodiversity Conservation, 12, 3323–3341.Google Scholar
Lundberg, J. G., Kottelat, M., Smith, G. R., Stiassny, M. L. J. & Gill, A. C. (2000). So many fishes, so little time: an overview of recent ichthyological discovery in continental waters. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 87, 26–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, G. M. (2004). The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 359, 711–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mace, G. M., Cramer, W., Diaz, S., et al. (2010). Biodiversity targets after 2010. Current Opinions in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 3–8.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., et al. (2000). Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications, 10, 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallet, J. (2007). Hybrid speciation. Nature, 446, 279–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallet, J. (2008). Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 363, 2971–2986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallet, J. & Willmott, K. (2003). Taxonomy: renaissance or Tower of Babel?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmqvist, B. & Rundle, S. (2002). Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environmental Conservation, 29, 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, S. M., Sutcliffe, L. M. E., Day, J. A., Griffiths, C. L. & Skelton, P. H. (2009). Conserving the fishes of the Twee River, Western Cape, South Africa: revisiting the issues. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 34, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattick, J. S. (2012). Rocking the foundations of molecular genetics. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, 16400–16401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MEA. (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Meffe, G. K. (2002). Connecting science to management and policy in freshwater fish conservation. In Conservation of Freshwater Fish: Options for the Future. Collares-Pereira, M. J., Cowx, I. G. & Coelho, M. M. (Eds). Oxford: Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, pp. 363–372.Google Scholar
Moreira, I., Ferreira, M. T., Cortes, R. M., Pinto, P. & Almeida, R. (2002). Ecossistemas Aquáticos e Ribeirinhos. Lisboa: Instituto da Água – Ministérios das Cidades, Ordenamento do Território e Ambiente. (In Portuguese.)Google Scholar
Moritz, C. (1994). Defining ‘Evolutionary Significant Units’ for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 373–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MorrisonIII, W. R., Lohr, J. L., Duchen, P., et al. (2009). The impact of taxonomic change on conservation: does it kill, can it save, or is it just irrelevant?Biological Conservation, 142, 3201–3206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MRC (Mekong River Commission). (2011). Procedures for Notification, Prior Consultation and Agreement; Proposed Xayaburi Dam Project – Mekong River Prior Consultation Project Review Report, Mekong River Commission Secretariat. Vientiane Laos PDR.
Nagelkerke, L. A. J., Sibbing, F. A., van den Boogaart, J. G. M., Lammens, E. H. R. R. & Osse, J. W. M. (1994). The barbs (Barbus spp.) of Lake Tana: a forgotton species flock?Environmental Biology of Fishes, 39, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. S. (2006). Fishes of the World, fourth edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Pike, T. & Tedder, A. J. (1973). Rediscovery of Oreodaimon quathlambae (Barnard). The Lammergeyer, 19, 9–15.Google Scholar
Pleijel, F., Jondelius, U., Norlinder, E., et al. (2008). Phylogenies without roots? A plea for the use of vouchers in molecular phylogenetic studies. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 48, 369–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rall, J. L. (1993). An ecological study of the Maluti Minnow (Pseudobarbus quathlambae) in the catchment area of phase 1B of the Lesotho Highlands Water Scheme. MSc thesis, Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Rall, J. L. (1999). Development of a Conservation Program on Pseudobarbus quathlambae in the catchment area of Phase 1B of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. PhD thesis, Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ratnasingham, S. & Hebert, P. D. N. (2013). A DNA-based registery for all animal species: the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PLoS ONE, 8, e66213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, G. McG. (2010). Taxonomy and the survival of threatened animal species – a matter of life and death. In Systema Naturae 250 The Linnean Ark. Polaszek, A. (Ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Reid, G. McG., Contreras MacBeath, T. & Csatádi, K. (2013). Global challenges in freshwater fish conservation related to public aquariums and the aquarium industry. International Zoo Yearbook, 47, 6–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricciardi, A. & Rasmussen, J. B. (1999). Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology, 13, 1220–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, C. L., Bossdorf, O. & Pigliucci, M. (2010). What role does heritable epigenetic variation play in phenotypic evolution?BioScience, 60, 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, B. D., Braun, D. P., Mendelson, M. A. & Master, L. L. (1997). Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology, 11, 1081–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokas, A. & Abbot, P. (2009). Harnessing genomics for evolutionary insights. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 192–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rondorf, D. W. (1976). New locations of Oreodaimon quathlambae (Barnard, 1938) (Pisces, Cyprinidae) populations. South African Journal of Science, 72, 150–151.Google Scholar
Scribner, K. T., Page, K. S. & Bartron, M. L. (2001). Hybridization in freshwater fishes: a review of case studies and cytonuclear methods of biological inference. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 10, 293–323.Google Scholar
Skelton, P. H. (1974). A new Barbus species (Pisces, Cyprinidae) from the Olifants River system, Western Cape Province, South Africa. Special Publications of the Rhodes University Department of Ichthyology, 13, 1–12.Google Scholar
Skelton, P. H. (1980). Systematics and biogeography of the redfin Barbus species (Pisces, Cyprinidae) from Southern Africa. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
Skelton, P. H. (1987). South African Red Data Book – Fishes. South African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 137, pp. 1–199.
Skelton, P. H. (1988). A taxonomic revision of the redfin minnows (Pisces, Cyprinidae) from Southern Africa. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums (Natural History), 16, 201–307.Google Scholar
Skelton, P. H. (2001). A Complete Guide to the Freshwater Fishes of Southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Struik Publishers.Google Scholar
Skelton, P. H. (2002). An overview of the challenges of conserving freshwater fishes in South Africa. In Conservation of Freshwater Fish: Options for the Future. Collares-Pereira, M. J., Cowx, I. G. & Coelho, M. M. (Eds). Oxford: Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, pp. 221–236.Google Scholar
Skelton, P. H. (2011). The Twee River redfin – a Critically Endangered minnow from South Africa. Species in the spotlight. In The Diversity of Life in African Freshwaters: Under Water, Under Threat. An Analysis of the Status and Distribution of Freshwater Species throughout Mainland Africa. Darwall, W. R. T., Smith, K. G., Allem, D. J., et al. (Eds). Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp. 85–86.Google Scholar
Skelton, P. H. & Masapha, S. (1989). The fauna and physico-chemical characteristics of riverine aquatic systems. Drakensberg/Maloti Mountain Catchment Conservation Programme, Final Report.
Sokal, R. R. & Crovello, T. J. (1970). The Biological Species Concept: a critical evaluation. American Naturalist, 104, 127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, D. L. & Dudgeon, D. (2010). Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29, 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, E. R., Skelton, P. H. & Bloomer, P. (2007). Sea-level changes, river capture and the evolution of populations of the Eastern Cape and fiery redfins (Pseudobarbus afer and Pseudobarbus phlegethon, Cyprinidae) across multiple river systems in South Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 2086–2099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, E. R., Skelton, P. H. & Bloomer, P. (2009). Phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Pseudobarbus (Cyprinidae): shedding light on the drainage history of rivers associated with the Cape Floristic Kingdom. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 51, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tautz, D., Arctander, P., Minelli, A., Thomas, R. H. & Vogler, A. P. (2003). A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweddle, D., Bills, R., Swartz, E., et al. (2009). The status and distribution of freshwater fishes. In The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Biodiversity in Southern Africa. Darwall, W. R. T., Smith, K. G., Tweddle, D. & Skelton, P. (Eds). Gland: IUCN and Grahamstown, South Africa: SAIAB, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
Vorösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, R. D., Hanner, R. & Hebert, P. D. N. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. Journal of Fish Biology, 74, 329–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welcomme, R. L., Cowx, I. G., Coates, D., et al. (2010). Inland capture fisheries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 1554, 2881–2896.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Q. D. (2003). Transforming taxonomy. The Systematist, 22, 3–5.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×