Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:55:35.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - A Distinctive Path

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Donald L. Horowitz
Donald L. Horowitz
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

The unanticipated fall of Suharto in May 1998 left standing a disparate cast of political leaders, who eventually settled upon an unusual strategy of democratic reform. The path they chose had three main characteristics.

First, it was insider dominated. An important role was played by leaders active in the former authoritarian regime who were now operating in a genuinely competitive environment. Those leaders and the former opposition leaders who joined them in the legislature after elections pursued radical constitutional change intramurally, without resort to a constitutional commission or a convention and with relatively little consultation with civil society bodies or the public at large. The revised constitution was unequivocally the politicians’ product. It was not subject to any outside approval process. It was an inside job.

Second, the sequence of reform put elections before constitutional change. Given Indonesia’s authoritarian history, legitimation at the polls might have been seen as empowering newly elected legislators and allowing them to stop short of developing a fully liberal democracy, but putting elections first actually had a different effect; it opened up a competitive process that carried even the most reluctant democratizers along and conferred sufficient authority on the legislators to pursue a full course of reform, which is what they did.

Type
Chapter
Information
Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia , pp. 1 - 29
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Young, Ernest A., “The Constitution Outside the Constitution,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 117, no. 3 (December 2007), pp. 408–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinall, Edward, “Indonesia: The Irony of Success,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 21, no. 2 (April 2010), pp. 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, Andrew, Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000), pp. 167–97Google Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus, “From Soeharto to Habibie: The Indonesian Armed Forces and Political Islam during the Transition,” in Forrester, Geoff, ed., Post-Soeharto Indonesia: Renewal or Chaos? (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), pp. 65–102Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart, “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,” Comparative Politics, vol. 2, no. 3 (April 1970), pp. 337–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Jacques, Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 114–83Google Scholar
Legge, J. D., Sukarno: A Political Biography (New York: Praeger, 1972), pp. 47–48.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L., Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000), pp. 612, 632–38Google Scholar
Schmitter, C., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (Leiden: Brill, 1986)Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991), p. 122Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie, “Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 33, nos. 6–7 (August–September 2000), pp. 703–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinall, Edward, Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance, and Regime Change (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005), pp. 208, 238, 240.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R., The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), p. 26.Google Scholar
Liddle, R. William, Leadership and Culture in Indonesian Politics (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1996), pp. 15–36Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Democracy and the Market (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFaul, Michael, “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World,” World Politics, vol. 54, no. 2 (January 2002), pp. 212–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin, “Post-Conflict Elections: Constraints and Dangers,” in Newman, Edward and Schnabel, Albrecht, eds., Recovering from Civil Conflict (London: Frank Cass, 2002), pp. 118–39Google Scholar
Paris, Roland, At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard and Shin, Doh Chull, “Democratization Backwards: The Problem of Third Way Democracies,” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 31, no. 2 (April 2001), pp. 331–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, “Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-making Process,” Duke Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 2 (November 1995), pp. 364–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, “The Optimal Design of a Constituent Assembly,” in Landemore, Hélène and Elster, Jon, eds., Collective Wisdom (forthcoming, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Cottrell, Jill and Ghai, Yash, “Constitution Making and Democratization in Kenya,” Democratization, vol. 14, no. 1 (February 2007), pp. 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghai, Yash, “Constitution-making in a New Iraq,” in Ghai, Yash et al., Building Democracy in Iraq (London: Minority Rights Group, 2003), pp. 27–38Google Scholar
Samuels, Kirsti, “Constitution Building Processes and Democratization: A Discussion of Twelve Case Studies,” Stockholm, Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2006, p. 26Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, “Constitution-Making in Eastern Europe: Rebuilding the Boat in the Open Sea,” Public Administration, vol. 71, nos. 1–2 (Spring–Summer 1993), pp. 169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International IDEA Annual Report 2008 (Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2009), p. 33.
Ginsburg, Tom, Elkins, Zachary, and Blount, Justin, “Does the Process of Constitution-Making Matter?” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 5 (2009), pp. 201–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widner, Jennifer, “Constitution Writing in Post-Conflict Settings,” William and Mary Law Review, vol. 49, no. 4 (March 2008), pp. 1513–41Google Scholar
Miller, , “Designing Constitution-Making Processes: Lessons from the Past, Questions for the Future,” in Miller, Laurel E., ed., Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2010), pp. 636, 637Google Scholar
Carey, John M., “Does It Matter How a Constitution Is Created?” unpublished paper, Dartmouth College, March 26, 2009, pp. 23–24
Sung-Joo, Han, “South Korea in 1987: The Politics of Democratization,” Asian Survey, vol. 28, no. 1 (January 1988), pp. 52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Kent, “Restoration or Transformation? ‘Trapos’ versus NGOs in the Democratization of the Philippines,” Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 62, no. 2 (May 2003), pp. 469–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, Mark R., “Off the Endangered List: Philippine Democratization in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Politics, vol. 28, no. 2 (January 1996), pp. 179–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunbongkarn, Suchit, “Thailand’s Successful Reform,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 10, no. 4 (October 1999), pp. 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincione, Guido and Tesón, Fernando R., Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation: A Theory of Discourse Failure (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nathan J., “Reason, Interest, Rationality, and Passion in Constitution Drafting,” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 6, no. 4 (December 2008), pp. 675–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L., “Constitutional Design: Proposals versus Processes,” in Reynolds, Andrew, ed., The Architecture of Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 15–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, , “Constitutional Design: An Oxymoron?” NOMOS, vol. 42 (2000), pp. 253–84Google Scholar
Cribb, Robert, “Democracy, Self-Determination and the Indonesian Revolution,” in Drakard, Jane and Legge, John, eds., Indonesian Independence Fifty Years On, 1945–1995, Annual Indonesia Lecture Series, no. 20 (Clayton, Victoria: Monash Asia Institute, 1996), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Tinker, Hugh, India and Pakistan: A Political Analysis, rev. ed. (New York: Praeger, 1967), pp. 24–26
Lindsey, Tim, “Indonesia: Devaluing Asian Values, Rewriting Rule of Law,” in Peerenboom, Randall, ed., Asian Discourses on Rule of Law (London: Routledge, 2003), pp. 286–323Google Scholar
Nasution, Adnan Buyung, The Aspiration for Constitutional Government in Indonesia (The Hague: Gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek, 1992), pp. 60–61, 90–103Google Scholar
Zainu’ddin, Ailsa, A Short History of Indonesia (New York: Praeger, 1970)Google Scholar
Cribb, Robert, ed., The Indonesian Killings, 1965–66: Studies from Java and Bali (Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Papers on Southeast Asia, 1990)
Mietzner, Marcus, “The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance,” East-West Center Policy Studies, no. 23, Washington, DC, 2006, p. 7Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991), p. 111Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P., “Will More Countries Become Democratic?” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 99, no. 2 (Summer 1984), pp. 193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry, “Is the Third Wave Over?” Journal of Democracy, vol. 7, no. 3 (July 1996), pp. 20–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics (New York: Anchor Books, 1963)Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Democracy and the Market (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Jones, David Martin, “Democratization, Civil Society, and Illiberal Middle Class Culture in Pacific Asia,” Comparative Politics, vol. 30, no. 2 (January 1998), pp. 147–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegenhain, Patrick, The Indonesian Parliament and Democratization (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008), pp. 53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlin, Anders, Indonesia and the “Third Wave of Democratization” (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997), pp. 155–64Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I., ed., Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009)
Kuenzi, Michelle and Lambright, Gina, “Party System Institutionalization in 30 African Countries,” Party Politics, vol. 7, no. 4 (July 2001), pp. 437–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul, Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Jacques, “Ethnic Conflicts in Indonesia: National Models, Critical Junctures, and the Timing of Violence,” Journal of East Asian Studies, vol. 8, no. 3 (September–December 2008), pp. 425–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Klinken, Gerry, Communal Violence and Democratization in Indonesia: Small Town Wars (London: Routledge, 2007), p. 4Google Scholar
Feith, Herbert, The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962), pp. 487–593Google Scholar
Crouch, Harold, Political Reform in Indonesia after Soeharto (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2010), p. 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • A Distinctive Path
  • Donald L. Horowitz, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225724.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • A Distinctive Path
  • Donald L. Horowitz, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225724.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • A Distinctive Path
  • Donald L. Horowitz, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225724.003
Available formats
×