Book contents
- Copyright and Collective Authorship
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Copyright and Collective Authorship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Chapter 1 Copyright Law and Collective Authorship
- Chapter 2 Authorship and Joint Authorship
- Chapter 3 Wikipedia
- Chapter 4 Australian Indigenous Art
- Chapter 5 Scientific Collaborations
- Chapter 6 Film
- Chapter 7 Characteristics of Collective Authorship and the Role of Copyright Law
- Chapter 8 An Inclusive, Contextual Approach to the Joint Authorship Test
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2019
Book contents
- Copyright and Collective Authorship
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Copyright and Collective Authorship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Chapter 1 Copyright Law and Collective Authorship
- Chapter 2 Authorship and Joint Authorship
- Chapter 3 Wikipedia
- Chapter 4 Australian Indigenous Art
- Chapter 5 Scientific Collaborations
- Chapter 6 Film
- Chapter 7 Characteristics of Collective Authorship and the Role of Copyright Law
- Chapter 8 An Inclusive, Contextual Approach to the Joint Authorship Test
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Copyright and Collective AuthorshipLocating the Authors of Collaborative Work, pp. 273 - 293Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bibliography
(last accessed on 17 August 2018)
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimania>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Barnstars>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editing_policy#Try_to_fix_problems>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Etiquette>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies_and_guidelines>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_articles>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Welcoming_committee/Welcome_to_Wikipedia>
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians>
<fanfiction.wikia.com/wiki/A_Million_Penguins>
<stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm>
<public.web.cern.ch/public/en/About/Global-en.html>
<www.afc.gov.au/filminginaustralia/indigproto/fiapage9.aspx>
<www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wikipedia.org>
<www.artslaw.com.au/Indigenous/IndigenousArtistAndArtCentreAgreement.asp>
<www.bfi.org.uk/film-industry>
<www.culture.com.au/exhibition/niaaa/labelqa.htm>
<www.gov.uk/government/publications/digital-opportunity-review-of-intellectual-property-and-growth>
<www.gov.uk/guidance/copyright-orphan-works>
‘BECTU seeks screen credits for all VFX artists’ (10 July 2017) <www.bectu.org.uk/news/2731>>Google Scholar
‘Creative Nation’, Commonwealth Cultural Policy Statement, October 1994Google Scholar
Dracula (1992) (Film)Google Scholar
Jurassic Park (1993) (Film)Google Scholar
Pulp Fiction (1994) (Film)Google Scholar
‘Report of the Board of Trade Copyright Committee’ (Her Majesty’s Stationery Company October 1952) Cmd 8662 (‘Gregory Report’)Google Scholar
‘Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee on the question of authorship of cinematographic or audiovisual works in the Community of 6 December 2002’ COM (2002) 691Google Scholar
‘Report of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody’, tabled in the Australian Federal Parliament on 9 May 1991Google Scholar
‘The Collaborative Economy: Impact and Potential of Collaborative Internet and Additive Manufacturing’ (Science and Technology Options Assessment Panel Study, European Parliament, PE 547.425, Dec 2015) <www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/fr/document.html?reference=EPRS_STU(2015)547425>>Google Scholar
The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993) (Film)Google Scholar
The Shining (1980) (Film)Google Scholar
Stopping the Rip-Offs: Intellectual Property Protection for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, Australian Federal Government, October 1994 <www.ag.gov.au/Publications/Pages/StoppingtheripoffsOctober1994.aspx>>Google Scholar
‘The 7.30 Report’, ABC, 19 August 2010 <www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2010/s2988038.htm>>Google Scholar
‘The Collaborative Economy: Impact and Potential of Collaborative Internet and Additive Manufacturing’ (Science and Technology Options Assessment Panel Study, European Parliament, PE 547.425, Dec 2015) <www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/fr/document.html?reference=EPRS_STU(2015)547425>>Google Scholar
‘Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals’ (1997) 277 JAMA 928Google Scholar
Adeney, E, ‘Unfixed Works, Performers’ Protection, and Beyond: Does the Australian Copyright Act Always Require Material Form?’ (2009) IPQ 77Google Scholar
Adeney, E ‘Authorship and Fixation in Copyright Law: A Comparative Comment’ (2011) 35 Melbourne University LRev 677Google Scholar
Allen, RJ and Pardo, MS, ‘Facts of Law and Facts in Law’ (2003) 7 International J of Evidence and Proof 135Google Scholar
Annas, M, ‘The Label of Authenticity: A Certification Trade Mark for Goods and Services of Indigenous Origin’ (1997) 3(90) Aboriginal L Bulletin 4Google Scholar
Arnold, R, Bently, L, Derclaye, E, Dinwoodie, G, ‘IP Law Post-Brexit’ (2017) 101(2) Judicature 65Google Scholar
Astala, M, ‘Comment, Wronged by a Professor? Breach of Fiduciary Duty as a Remedy in Intellectual Property Infringement Case’ (2003) 3 Houston Bus & Tax LJ 31Google Scholar
Astruc, A, ‘The Birth of the Avant Garde: Le Caméra Stylo’, L’Écran français, 30 March 1948Google Scholar
Australian Senate Standing Committee on Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, Indigenous Art – Securing the Future: Australia’s Indigenous Visual Arts and Craft Sector, (June 2007) (‘Senate Report’)Google Scholar
Ayres, R, ‘The Wandjina Case Illustrates the Lack of Protection for Indigenous Culture’, Art+Law, Issue 3, September 2010Google Scholar
Bacharach, S and Tollefsen, D, ‘We Did It Again: A Reply to Livingston’ (2011) 69(2) J of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 225Google Scholar
Bacharach, S and Tollefsen, D, ‘We Did It: From Mere Contributors to Coauthors’ (2010) 68(1) J of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 23Google Scholar
Barlow, JP, ‘The Economy of Ideas: Selling Wine Without Bottles on the Global Net’ <www.eff.org/pages/selling-wine-without-bottles-economy-mind-global-net>>Google Scholar
Barnett, J, ‘Hollywood Deals: Soft Contracts for Hard Markets’ (2015) 64 Duke Law Journal 605Google Scholar
Barron, A ‘Copyright Law and Musical Practice: Harmony or Dissonance?’ (2006) 15 (1) Social and Legal Studies 25Google Scholar
Barthes, R, ‘The Death of the Author’ in Heath S (trans) Image, Music, Text (Fontana, 1977) 142Google Scholar
Barzilai, G, Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities (U of Michigan Press 2003)Google Scholar
Bazerman, C, ‘Emerging Perspectives on the Many Dimensions of Scientific Discourse’ in Martin, JS and Veel, R (eds), Reading Science: Critical Functional Perspectives on discourses of Science (Routledge 1988) 15Google Scholar
Beazley, MJ, ‘The Distinction between Questions of Fact and Law: A Question without an Answer?’ (2013) 11 The Judicial Rev 279Google Scholar
Beebe, B, ‘Bleistein, the Problem of Aesthetic Progress, and the Making of American Copyright Law’ (2017) 117 Columbia LRev 319Google Scholar
Behrendt, L, Cunneen, C, Libesman, T, Indigenous Legal Relations in Australia (OUP 2009)Google Scholar
Bently, L, ‘Copyright and the Death of the Author in Literature and Law’ (1994) 57 MLR 973Google Scholar
Bently, L ‘R v Author: From Death Penalty to Community Service’ (2008) 32(1) Columbia J of L & the Arts 1Google Scholar
Bently, L ‘Authorship of Popular Music in UK Copyright Law’ (2009) 12(2) Information Communication & Society 179Google Scholar
Bently, L and Biron, L, ‘Discontinuities between legal conceptions of authorship and social practices: What, if anything, is to be done?’ in van Eechoud, M (ed) The Work of Authorship (Amsterdam UP 2014) 237Google Scholar
Bently, L, Sherman, B, Gangjee, D and Johnson, P, Intellectual Property Law (OUP 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhopal, R et al., ‘The Vexed Question of Authorship: Views of Researchers in a British Medical Faculty’ (1997) 314 (7086) British Medical J 1009Google Scholar
Biagioli, M and Galison, P (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge 2003)Google Scholar
Biagioli, M, ‘Rights or Rewards? Changing Frameworks of Scientific Authorship’ in Biagioli, M and Galison, P (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge 2003) 260Google Scholar
Biagioli, M ‘Documents of Documents: Scientists’ Names and Scientific Claims’ in Riles, A (ed) Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge (U of Michigan Press 2006) 129Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C and Muldoon, R, ‘Social Norms’ in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy <plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-norms>>Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C, The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms (CUP 2006)Google Scholar
Birnholtz, J, ‘When Authorship Isn’t Enough: Lessons from CERN on the Implications of Formal and Informal Credit Attribution Mechanisms in Collaborative Research’ (2008) 11(1) Journal of Electronic Publishing <dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.105>Google Scholar
Biro, MM, ‘Smart Leaders and the Power of Collaboration’, Forbes (3 March 2013), <www.forbes.com/sites/meghanbiro/2013/03/03/smart-leaders-and-the-power-ofcollaboration>..>Google Scholar
Biron, L and Cooper, E, ‘Authorship, Aesthetics and the Art World: Reforming Copyright’s Joint Authorship Doctrine’ (2016) 35 Law and Philosophy 55Google Scholar
Blackstone, W, Commentaries, Volume 1Google Scholar
Bloomfield, D, Collins, K, Fry, C and Munton, R, ‘Deliberation and Inclusion: Vehicles for Increasing Trust in UK Public Governance’ (2001) 19 Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 501Google Scholar
Bloore, P, The Screenplay Business: Managing Creativity and Script Development in the Film Industry (Routledge 2012)Google Scholar
Bloore, P Managing Creativity and Script Development in the Film Industry (Routledge 2013)Google Scholar
Bonadio, E, ‘Joint Ownership of Films in the Absence of Express Terms’ (2012) 7(7) JIPLP 493Google Scholar
Bodó, B, ‘Pirates in the Library – An Inquiry into the Guerrilla Open Access Movement’ (8th Annual Workshop of the International Society for the History and Theory of Intellectual Property, CREATe, University of Glasgow, 6–8 July 2016) (available at SSRN: <ssrn.com/abstract=2816925>).).>Google Scholar
Bowrey, K, ‘The Outer Limits of Copyright Law – Where Law Meets Philosophy and Culture’ (2001) 12 L and Critique 75Google Scholar
Bowrey, K ‘Alternative IP?: Indigenous Protocols, Copyleft and New Juridifications of Customary Practices’ (2006) 6 Macquarie LJ 65Google Scholar
Bowrey, K ‘Economic Rights, Culture Claims and a Culture of Piracy in the Indigenous Art Market: What Should We Expect from the Western Legal System?’ (2009) 13(2) Australian Indigenous LRev 43–4Google Scholar
Bowrey, K and Anderson, J, ‘The Politics of Global Information Sharing: Whose Cultural Agendas Are Being Advanced?’ (2009) 18 Social and Legal Studies 479.Google Scholar
Boyle, J, Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society (Harvard UP 1996)Google Scholar
Boyle, J ‘Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain’ (2003) 66 L and Contemporary Problems 33Google Scholar
Bracha, O and Syed, T ‘Beyond Efficiency: Consequence-Sensitive Theories of Copyright’ (2014) 29 Berkeley Tech LJ 229Google Scholar
Bracha, O, ‘The Ideology of Authorship Revisited: Authors, Markets, and Liberal Values in Early American copyright’ (2008) 118 Yale LJ 186Google Scholar
Bracha, O ‘How Did Film Become Property? Copyright and the Early American Film Industry’ in Sherman, B and Wiseman, L, Copyright and the Challenge of the New (Wolters Kluwer 2012) 141Google Scholar
Breyer, S, ‘The Uneasy Case For Copyright: A Study of Books, Photocopies and Computer Programs’ (1970) 84(2) Harvard LRev 281Google Scholar
Bruns, A, Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage (Peter Lang 2008)Google Scholar
Buccafusco, C, ‘On the Legal Consequences of Sauces: Should Thomas Keller’s Recipes Be Per Se Copyrightable?’ (2007) 24 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment LJ 1121Google Scholar
Burk, D, ‘Research Misconduct: Deviance, Due Process, and the Disestablishment of Science’ (1995) 3 George Mason U Independent LRev 305Google Scholar
Burkitt, D, ‘Copyrighting Culture – The History and Cultural Specificity of the Western Model of Copyright’ (2001) IPQ 146Google Scholar
Burleson, K, ‘Learning from Copyright’s Failure to Build Its Future’ (2014) 89(3) Indiana LJ 1299Google Scholar
Carter, S, ‘Custom, Adjudication and Petrushevsky’s Watch: Some Notes from the Intellectual Property Front’ (1992) 78 Virginia LRev 129Google Scholar
Chander, A and Sunder, M, ‘The Romance of the Public Domain’ (2004) 92 California LRev 1331Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, E, ‘In Defense of Equality: A Reply to Professor Westen’ (1983) 81 Michigan LRev 575Google Scholar
Chon, M, ‘New Wine Bursting From Old Bottles: Collaborative Internet Art, Joint Works, and Entrepreneurship’ (1996) 75 Oregon LJ 257Google Scholar
Clark, G and Davies, I, ‘Mediation – When Is It Not an Appropriate Dispute Resolution Process?’ (1992) 3(2) Australian Dispute Resolution J 70Google Scholar
Claxton, L, ‘Scientific Authorship Part 2: History, Recurring Issues, Practices, and Guidelines’ (2005) 589 Mutation Research 31Google Scholar
Cohen, J, ‘Creativity and Culture in Copyright Theory’ (2007) 40 U of California Davis LRev 1151Google Scholar
Conley, T, ‘End Credits’ in Biagioli, M and Galison, P (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge 2003) 360Google Scholar
Coombe, R, ‘Contingent Articulations: A Critical Cultural Studies of Law’ in Sarat, A and Kearns, T (eds), Law in the Domains of Culture (U of Michigan Press 1998)Google Scholar
Coombe, R The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the Law (Duke UP 1998)Google Scholar
Coombe, R ‘Fear, Hope and Longing for the Future of Authorship and a Revitalized Public Domain in Global Regimes of Intellectual Property’ (2003) 52 DePaul LRev 1171Google Scholar
Cooper, E, ‘Joint Authorship in Comparative Perspective: Levy v Rutley and the divergence between the UK and USA’ (2005) 62(2) Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 245Google Scholar
Corbett, S, ‘Creative Commons Licences, the Copyright Regime and the Online Community: Is There a Fatal Disconnect?’ (2011) 74(4) MLR 503Google Scholar
Cornish, W, Llewelyn, D and Aplin, T, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)Google Scholar
Craig, C ‘Reconstructing the Author-Self: Some Feminist Lessons for Copyright Law’ (2007) 15(2) J of Gender Social Policy and the Law 207Google Scholar
Craig, C Copyright, Communication and Culture: Towards a Relational Theory of Copyright Law (Edward Elgar 2011)Google Scholar
Datta, A, ‘Collective Bargaining Agreements in the Film Industry: US Guild Agreements for Germany?’ (2013) 2(1) Berkeley J of Entertainment and Sports L 200Google Scholar
Davenport, R, ‘Screen Credit in the Entertainment Industry’ (1990) 10 Loyola Entertainment LJ 129Google Scholar
Davis, P, ‘An Authorship Accelerator’ <scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/12/08/hep-authorship> dated 8 December 2008+dated+8+December+2008>Google Scholar
Decherney, P, Hollywood’s Copyright Wars: From Edison to the Internet (Columbia UP 2012)Google Scholar
Department for Culture Media and Sport, ‘A Future For British Film: It Begins with the Audience … ’ Film Policy Review, 2012Google Scholar
Derclaye, E, ‘Do Sections 3 and 3 A of the CDPA Violate the Database Directive? A Closer Look at the Definition of a Database in the UK and Its Compatibility with European Law’ (2002) 24(10) EIPR 466Google Scholar
Derclaye, E ‘What is a Database? A Critical Analysis of the Definition of a Database in the European Database Directive and Suggestions for an International Definition’ (2002) 5(6) JWIP 981Google Scholar
Derclaye, E ‘Databases Sui Generis Right: Should We Adopt the Spin Off Theory?’ (2004) 26(9) EIPR 402Google Scholar
Derclaye, E ‘The Court of Justice Interprets the Database Sui Generis Right for the First Time’ (2005) 30(3) Eur LR 420Google Scholar
Derclaye, E ‘Database Sui Generis Right: What Is a Substantial Investment? A Tentative Definition’ (2005) 36(1) Intl Rev of Intellectual Property and Competition L 2Google Scholar
Derclaye, E ‘Case Comment: Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08): Wonderful or Worrisome? The Impact of the ECJ Ruling in Infopaq on UK Copyright Law’ (2010) 32(5) EIPR 247Google Scholar
Dietz, A, ‘The Concept of Authorship Under the Berne Convention’ (1993) 155 Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur 3Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, G, ‘Private Ordering and the Creation of International Copyright Norms: The Role of Public Structuring’ (2004) 160 J of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 161Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, G and Dreyfuss, RC, ‘Brexit and IP: The Great Unravelling?’ (2017) 39 Cardozo L Rev 967Google Scholar
Diver, A, ‘“A Just War”: Protecting Indigenous Cultural Property’ (2004) 6(4) Indigenous L Bulletin 7Google Scholar
Dodson, M and Barr, O, ‘Breaking the Deadlock: Developing and Indigenous Response ecting Indigenous Traditional Knowledge’ (2007) 11(2) Australian Indigenous LR 19Google Scholar
Dougherty, J, ‘Not A Spike Lee Joint? Issues in the Authorship of Motion Pictures Under US Copyright Law’ (2001) 49 UCLA LRev 225Google Scholar
Dougherty, J ‘The Misapplication of “Mastermind”: A Mutant Species of Work for Hire and the Mystery of Disappearing Copyrights’ (2016) 39 Columbia J L & Arts 463Google Scholar
Drahos, P with Braithwaite, J, Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? (Routledge 2002)Google Scholar
Drassinower, A, ‘From Distribution to Dialogue: Remarks on the Concept of Balance in Copyright Law’ (2009) 34(4) J of Corporation L 991Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, RC, ‘Collaborative Research: Conflicts on Authorship, Ownership and Accountability’ (2000) 53 Vanderbilt LRev 1161Google Scholar
Dusollier, S, ‘Open Source and Copyleft: Authorship Reconsidered?’ (2003) 26 Columbia J of L and Arts 281Google Scholar
Dusollier, S ‘The Master’s Tools v the Master’s House: Creative Commons v Copyright’ (2005) 29 Columbia J of L and Arts 271Google Scholar
Dusollier, S ‘Sharing Access to Intellectual Property through Private Ordering’ (2007) 82(3) Chicago-Kent LRev 1391Google Scholar
Dworkin, G, ‘Authorship of Films and the European Commission Proposal for Harmonising the Term of Copyright’ (1993) EIPR 151Google Scholar
Dysart, T, ‘Author-Protective Rules and Alternative Licences: A Review of the Dutch Copyright Contract Act’ (2015) 37(9) EIPR 601Google Scholar
Eisenberg, R ‘Proprietary Rights and the Norms of Science in Biotechnology Research’ (1987) 97 Yale LJ 177Google Scholar
Elkin-Koren, N, ‘What Contracts Cannot Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitating a Creative Commons’ (2005) 74 Fordham LRev 375Google Scholar
Elkin-Koren, N ‘Tailoring Copyright to Social Production’ (2011) 12(1) Theoretical Inquiries in L 309Google Scholar
Ellison, D, ‘Unauthorised Reproduction of Traditional Aboriginal Art’ (1994) 17 UNSWLJ 327Google Scholar
Epstein, R, ‘Academic Fraud Today: Its Social Causes and Institutional Responses’ (2010) 21 Stanford L & Policy Rev 135Google Scholar
European Copyright Society, ‘Opinion on the pending reference before the CJEU in Case 310/17 (copyright protection of tastes)’ (19 February 2018) available at: <europeancopyrightsocietydotorg.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/ecs-opinion-on-protection-for-tastes-final1.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Everard, D, ‘Code of Conduct for Indigenous Art’, Art+Law, June 2009, available at <www.artslaw.com.au/artlaw/archive/2009/09CodeOfConduct.asp>>Google Scholar
Fauchart, E and von Hippel, EA, ‘Norm-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs’ (2008) 19(2) Organization Science 187Google Scholar
Finbow, K, ‘Nicole Kidman: “I had no control over Grace of Monaco”, Digital Spy, 27 May 2014Google Scholar
Fischmann, AO, ‘Implied Licence: An Emerging New Standard in Copyright Law’ (2009) 25 Santa Clara Computer & High Technology LJ 275Google Scholar
Fisher, R and Ury, W, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in (Houghton Mifflin 1981)Google Scholar
Fisher, W ‘Theories of Intellectual Property’ in Munzer, S (ed) New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (2001) <www.tfisher.org/publications.htm>>Google Scholar
Fisk, C, ‘Credit Where It’s Due: The Law and Norms of Attribution’ (2006) 95 Georgetown LJ 49Google Scholar
Fisk, C ‘The Jurisdiction of the Writers Guild to Determine the Authorship of Movies and Television Programs’ (2010) English Language Notes 48(15), available at SSRN: <ssrn.com/abstract=1694043>Google Scholar
Fisk, C ‘The Role of Private Intellectual Property Rights in Markets for Labor and Ideas: Screen Credit and the Writers Guild of America, 1938–2000’ (2012) 32 Berkeley J of Employment and Labour L 215Google Scholar
Foucault, M, ‘What Is an Author?’ in Bouchard, D (ed) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault (Cornell UP 1977)Google Scholar
Fox, M, Ciro, T and Duncan, N, ‘Creative Commons: An Alternative, Web-Based Copyright System’ (2005) 16(6) Entertainment LR 111Google Scholar
Fox, PS, ‘Preserving the Collaborative Spirit of American Theatre: The Need for a ‘Joint Authorship Default Rule’ in Light of the Rent Decision’s Unanswered Question’ (2001) 19 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment LJ 497Google Scholar
Free, D, ‘Beckingham v Hodgens: The Session Musician’s Claim to Music Copyright’ (2005) 1(3) Entertainment and Sports LJ 93, available at <www.warwick.ac.uk/go/eslj/issues/volume1/number3>Google Scholar
Fromer, JC, ‘Expressive Incentives in Intellectual Property’ (2012) 98 Virginia LRev 1745Google Scholar
Fugh-Berman, AJ, ‘The Haunting of Medical Journals: How Ghostwriting Sold “HRT”’ (2010) 7(9) PLoS Med e1000335Google Scholar
Galison, P, ‘The Collective Author’ in Biagioli, M and Galison, P (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge 2003) 329Google Scholar
Garfield, E, ‘Giving Credit Only Where It Is Due: The Problem of Defining Authorship’ (1995) 9(19) The Scientist 13Google Scholar
Garnett, KM, Davies, G, Harbottle, G, Copinger, WA and Skone James, EP, Copinger and Skone James on Copyright (16th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2011)Google Scholar
Garon, J, ‘Content, Control, and the Socially Networked Film’ (2010) 48 U of Louisville LRev 771Google Scholar
Gaut, B, ‘Film Authorship and Collaboration’ in Allen, R and Smith, M (eds), Film Theory and Philosophy (OUP 1997) 149Google Scholar
Geiger, C, ‘The Social Function of Intellectual Property Rights’ in Dinwoodie, GB (ed) Intellectual Property Law: Methods and Perspectives (Edward Elgar 2013) 153Google Scholar
Giblin, R and Weatherall, K (eds), What If We Could Reimagine Copyright? (ANU Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Gibson, J, ‘Justice of Precedent, Justice of Equity: Equitable Protection and Remedies for Indigenous Intellectual Property’ (2001) 6(4) Australian Indigenous L Reporter 1Google Scholar
Ginsburg, J, ‘Moral Rights in the Common Law System’ (1990) 1(4)Entertainment LRev 121Google Scholar
Ginsburg, J ‘How Copyright Got a Bad Name For Itself’ (2002) 26(1) Columbia J of L and the Arts 61Google Scholar
Ginsburg, J ‘The Concept of Authorship in Comparative Copyright Law’ (2003) 52 De Paul L Rev 1063Google Scholar
Ginsburg, J ‘The Author’s Name as a Trade Mark: A Perverse Perspective on the Moral Right of “Paternity”?’ (2005) 23 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment LJ 379Google Scholar
Ginsburg, J ‘The Author’s Place in the Future of Copyright’ in Okediji, R (ed) Copyright in an Age of Exceptions and Limitations (CUP, 2015) 60Google Scholar
Golvan, C, ‘Aboriginal Art and Copyright: The Case for Johnny Bulun Bulun’ (1989) 11(10) EIPR 346Google Scholar
Golvan, C ‘Aboriginal Art and the Protection of Indigenous Cultural Rights’ (1992) 14(7) EIPR 227Google Scholar
Golvan, C ‘Aboriginal Art and Copyright: An Overview and Commentary Concerning Recent Developments’ (1999) EIPR 549Google Scholar
Gomulkiewicz, R, ‘General Public License 3.0: Hacking the Free Software Movement’s Constitution’ (2006) 42(4) Houston LRev 1015Google Scholar
Gomulkiewicz, R ‘Conditions and Covenants in License Contracts: Tales from a Test of the Artistic License’ (2009) 17(3) Texas Intellectual Property LJ 335Google Scholar
Gomulkiewicz, R ‘Open Source License Proliferation: Helpful Diversity or Hopeless Confusion?’ (2009) 30 Washington UJ of L and Policy 261Google Scholar
Gonzalez, AG, ‘Viral Contracts or Unenforceable Documents? Contractual Validity of Copyleft Licences’ (2004) 26(8) EIPR 331Google Scholar
Gøtzsche, PC et al., ‘Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised Trials’ (2007) 4 PLoS Med e535Google Scholar
Gøtzsche, PC et al., ‘What Should Be Done to Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature?’ (2009) 6(2) PLoS Med e1000023Google Scholar
Graber, C, ‘Aboriginal Self-determination vs the Proprietisation of Traditional Culture: The Case of Sacred Wanjina Sites’ (2009) 13(2) Australian Indigenous L Report 18Google Scholar
Graber, C and Taubner, G, ‘Art and Money: Constitutional Rights in the Private Sphere?’ (1998) 18 OJLS 61Google Scholar
Griffin, J, ‘The Changing Nature of Authorship: Why Copyright Law Must Focus on the Increased Role of Technology’ (2005) IPQ 135Google Scholar
Guibault, L, Copyright Limitations and Contracts: An Analysis of the Contractual Overridability of Limitations on Copyright (Kluwer Law International 2002)Google Scholar
Guibault, L. ‘Wrapping Information in Contract: How Does it Affect the Public Domain?’ in Guibault, L and Hugenholtz, PB (eds), The Future of the Public Domain: Identifying the Commons in Information (Kluwer Law International 2006) 87Google Scholar
Guibault, L and Angelopoulos, C, Open Content Licensing: From Theory to Practice (Amsterdam UP 2011)Google Scholar
Gusterson, H, ‘The Death of the Authors of Death: Prestige and Creativity among Nuclear Weapons Scientists’ in Biagioli, M and Galison, P (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge 2003) 281Google Scholar
Halbert, DJ, Intellectual Property in the Information Age: The Politics of Expanding Ownership Rights (Quorum 1999)Google Scholar
Hamann, K, ‘Indigenous Australian Art Market Suffering Substantial Decline’, 9 August 2013, transcript of ABC Radio report available at: <www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2013/s3822279.htm>>Google Scholar
Handler, M, ‘Continuing Problems with Film Copyright’ in Macmillan, F (ed) New Directions in Copyright Law: Volume 6 (Edward Elgar 2007) 173Google Scholar
Hargreaves, I, ‘Digital opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth for HMG’ (2011) available at: <webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140606231343/http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview>>Google Scholar
Hawkins, C, ‘Stopping the Rip Offs: Protecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Expression’ (1995) Aboriginal L Bulletin 3Google Scholar
Heile, B, ‘Who Wrote Duke Ellington’s Music?’ in Rahmatian, A (ed) Concepts of Music and Copyright: How Music Perceives Itself and How Copyright Perceives Music (Edward Elgar 2015) 123Google Scholar
Henley, M, ‘Jacobsen v Katzer and Kamind Associates – An English Legal Perspective’ (2009) 1(1) IFOSS L Rev 41Google Scholar
Herrman, N and Lehnhardt, J ‘Germany’ in Allgrove, B (ed) International Copyright Law: A Practical Global Guide (Globe Business Publishing 2013) 203Google Scholar
Hick, DH, ‘Authorship, Co-Authorship, and Multiple Authorship’ (2014) 72(2) J of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 147Google Scholar
Hobbs, J, ‘The $200m industry of cheap fakes ripping off Indigenous artists’, Brisbane Times, 24 March 2018 <www.brisbanetimes.com.au/entertainment/art-and-design/the-200m-industry-of-cheap-fakes-ripping-off-indigenous-artists-20180324-p4z63m.html>>Google Scholar
Hobson, A, ‘Imperial Stormtroopers, Art Works, and Copyright Defences’ (2009) 4(1) JIPLP 16Google Scholar
Huang, T, ‘Gaiman v McFarlane: The Right Step in Determining Joint Authorship for Copyrighted Material’ (2005) 20(1) Berkeley Technology LJ 673Google Scholar
Hunt, E, ‘Chanel’s $2,000 boomerang criticised for “humiliating” Indigenous Australian culture’, The Guardian, 16 May 2018, <www.theguardian.com/fashion/2017/may/16/chanels-2000-boomerang-criticised-for-humiliating-indigenous-australian-culture>>Google Scholar
Iljadica, M, Copyright Beyond Law: Regulating Creativity in the Graffiti Subculture (Hart Publishing 2016)Google Scholar
Jackson, MW, ‘Can Artisans Be Scientific Authors? The Unique Case of Fraunhofer’s Artisanal Optics and the German Republic of Letters’ in Biagioli, M and Galison, P (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge 2003) 113Google Scholar
Janke, T Our Culture: Our Future - Report on Australian Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights (Michael Frankel & Co and Terri Janke 1998)Google Scholar
Janke, T Minding Culture: Case Studies on Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions (WIPO 2003)Google Scholar
Janke, T Beyond Guarding Ground: A Vision for a National Indigenous Cultural Authority (Terri Janke & Co 2009)Google Scholar
Jaszi, P, ‘Towards a Theory of Copyright: The Metamorphoses of Authorship’ (1991) 2 Duke LJ 455Google Scholar
Jaszi, P ‘On The Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity’ in Woodmansee, M and Jaszi, P (eds) The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature (Duke U Press 1999) 29Google Scholar
Jaszi, P ‘Is There Such a Thing as Postmodern Copyright?’ (2009) 12 Tulane J of Technology & IP 105Google Scholar
Janke, T and Dawson, P, ‘New Tracks: Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Expression and the Australian Intellectual Property System’ (Terri Janke and Company Pty Ltd, 2012) (<www.ipaustralia.gov.au/sites/g/files/net856/f/submission_-_terri_janke_and_company_ip_lawyers.pdf>)Google Scholar
Jensen, C, ‘The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Copyright, Digital Technology, and Social Norms (2003) 56(2) Stanford LRev 531Google Scholar
Jones, AH, ‘Can Authorship Policies Help Prevent Scientific Misconduct? What Role for Scientific Societies?’ (2003) 9 Science and Engineering Ethics 243Google Scholar
Judge, SK, ‘Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: The Unusual Use of Arbitration in Determining Screenwriting Credits’ (1997)13 Ohio State J on Dispute Resolution 221Google Scholar
Kahan, D, ‘Gentle Nudges vs. Hard Shoves: Solving the Sticky Norms Problem (2000) 97 U of Chicago LRev 607Google Scholar
Kaufman, R, ‘After 5 Years, Heated Controversy Persists in Science Copyright Case’ The Scientist, 14 September 1992 at: <www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/12483/title/After-5-Years-Heated-Controversy-Persists-In-Science-Copyright-Case>>Google Scholar
Keen, A, The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet Is Killing our Culture (Doubleday/Currency 2007)Google Scholar
Kipen, D, The Schreiber Theory: A Radical Rewrite of American Film History (Melville House 2006).Google Scholar
Kirgis, P, ‘Questions of Fact in the Practice of Law: A Response to Allen and Pardo’s “Facts in Law and Facts of Law”’ (2004) 8 International J of Evidence and Proof 47Google Scholar
Kleinart, S and Neale, M, The Oxford Companion to Aboriginal Art and Culture (OUP 2000)Google Scholar
Kwall, RR, ‘Author-Stories: Narrative’s Implications For Moral Rights And Copyright’s Joint Authorship Doctrine’ (2001) 75 Southern California LRev 1Google Scholar
Kwall, RR ‘The Author as Steward “for Limited Times”: A Review of “The Idea of Authorship in Copyright”’ (2008) 88 (3)Boston U LRev 685Google Scholar
Kwall, RR The Soul of Creativity: Forging a Moral Rights Law for the US (Stanford UP 2009)Google Scholar
Laddie, H, Prescott, P and Vitoria, M, The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs (4th edn, LexisNexis 2011)Google Scholar
LaFrance, M, ‘Authorship, Dominance, and the Captive Collaborator: Preserving the Rights of Joint Authors’ (2001) 50 Emory LJ 193Google Scholar
Lee, YH, ‘The Persistence of the Text: The Concept of the Work in Copyright Law’ Part 1 (2018) 1 IPQ 22; Part 2 (2018) 2 IPQ 107Google Scholar
Lemley, M, ‘Intellectual Property and Shrinkwrap Licenses’ (1995) 68 Southern California LRev 1239Google Scholar
Lessig, L, Free Culture: How Big Media uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity (Penguin Press 2004)Google Scholar
Lessig, L Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy (Penguin Press 2008)Google Scholar
Lessig, L The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World (Vintage Books 2002)Google Scholar
Lipton, J, ‘Wikipedia and the European Union Database Directive’ (2010) 26 Santa Clara Computer & Technology LJ 631Google Scholar
Litman, J, ‘Copyright Noncompliance (Or Why We Can’t “Just Say Yes” to Licensing)’ (1996) 29 NYU J of Intl L and Politics 237Google Scholar
Livingston, P, ‘Cinematic Authorship’ in Allen, R and Smith, M (eds), Film Theory and Philosophy (OUP 1997) 132Google Scholar
Livingston, P ‘On Authorship and Collaboration’ (2011) 69(2) J of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 221Google Scholar
Lopez Romero, T, ‘Sui Generis Systems for the Protection of Traditional Knowledge’ (2005) 6 International L: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional 301Google Scholar
Loren, LP, ‘Building a Reliable Semicommons of Creative Works: Enforcement of Creative Commons Licenses and Limited Abandonment of Copyright’ (2007) 14 George Mason LRev 271Google Scholar
Loshin, J, ‘Secrets Revealed: How Magicians Protect Intellectual Property without Law’ in Corcos, C (ed) Law and Magic: A Collection of Essays (Carolina Academic Press 2008) 123Google Scholar
Love, J and Hubbard, T, ‘The Big Idea: Prizes to Stimulate R&D for New Medicines’ (2007) 82 Chicago-Kent LRev 1519Google Scholar
Loux, A, ‘The Persistence of the Ancient Regime: Custom, Utility and the Common Law in the Nineteenth Century’ (1993) 79 Cornell LRev 183Google Scholar
Macey, J, ‘Public and Private Ordering and the Production of Legitimate and Illegitimate rules’ (1997) 82 Cornell L Rev 1123Google Scholar
Mackay, E, ‘Indigenous Traditional Knowledge, Copyright and Art – Shortcomings in Protection and an Alternative Approach’ (2009) 32(1) UNSWLJ 1Google Scholar
Macnab, G, ‘Johnny Depp’s New Film Transcendence Is Yet Another Expensive Flop – So Has the Star Lost His Mojo?’ The Independent, 30 April 2014Google Scholar
Madison, M, ‘Legal-ware: Contract and Copyright in the Digital Age’ (1998) 67 Fordham LRev 1025Google Scholar
Mainous III, AG, Bowen, MA, Zoller, JS, ‘The Importance of Interpersonal Relationship Factors in Decisions Regarding Authorship’ (2002) 34 Family Medicine 462Google Scholar
Mandel, GN, ‘The Public Perception of Intellectual Property’ (2014) 66 Florida LRev 261Google Scholar
Maneker, M, ‘How the Australian Gov’t Shattered Its Art Market’, Art Market Monitor, 27 July 2016, available at: <www.artmarketmonitor.com/2016/06/27/how-the-australian-govt-shattered-its-art-market>>Google Scholar
Manton, B, ‘Russian Ice Dancers Should Re-think their Routine’ Sydney Morning Herald, 21 January 2010 <www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/russian-ice-dancers-should-rethink-their-routine-20100121-mnwj.html>>Google Scholar
Marrella, F and Yoo, CS, ‘Is Open Source Software the New Lex Mercatoria?’ (2006–7) 47 Virginia J of International L 807Google Scholar
Masiyakurima, P, ‘The Futility of the Idea/Expression Dichotomy in UK Copyright Law’ (2007) 38 IIC 548Google Scholar
Matheson, A, ‘How Industry Uses the ICMJE Guidelines to Manipulate Authorship – And How They Should Be Revised’ (2011) 8(8) PLoS Med. 1001072Google Scholar
McCausland, S, ‘Protecting Communal Interests in Indigenous Artworks after the Bulun Bulun Case’ (1999) 4(22) Indigenous L Bulletin 4Google Scholar
McCutcheon, J, ‘The Vanishing Author in Computer-Generated Works: A Critical Analysis of Recent Australian Case Law’ (2013) 36(3) Melbourne LRev 915Google Scholar
McDonagh, L, ‘Copyright, Contract and FOSS’ in Shemtov, N and Walden, I (eds) Free and Open Source Software (OUP 2013) 69Google Scholar
McHenry, L, ‘Of Sophists and Spin-Doctors: Industry-Sponsored Ghostwriting and the Crisis of Academic Medicine’ (2010) 8(1) Journalology 129Google Scholar
McFarlin, T, ‘An Idea of Authorship: Orson Welles, The War of the Worlds Copyright, and Why We Should Recognize Idea-Contributors as Joint Authors; (2016) 66(3) Case Western LRev 701Google Scholar
McLaughlin, GM, ‘Oral Contracts in the Entertainment Industry’ (2001) 1(1) Virginia Sports and Entertainment LJ 101Google Scholar
McNary, D, ‘SAG-AFTRA Members Approve TV Animation Strike Authorization’ Variety (18 July 2018) <variety.com/2018/tv/news/sag-aftra-tv-animation-strike-1202877662>>Google Scholar
Merges, R, ‘The Concept of Property in the Digital Era’ (2008) 45(4) Houston LRev 1239Google Scholar
Merges, R ‘Locke for the Masses: Property Rights and the Products of Collective Creativity’ (2008) 36(4) Hofstra LRev 1179Google Scholar
Merges, R ‘Foundations and Principles Redux: A Reply to Professor Blankfein-Tabachnick’ (2013) 101 California LRev 1361Google Scholar
Merton, RK, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (Chicago UP 1973)Google Scholar
Metzger, A and Hennigs, S, ‘License Contracts, Free Software and Creative Commons’ Commons’ in Schauer, M and Verschraegen, B (eds) General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, Ius Comparatum – Global Studies in Comparative Law (Springer, 2017), Vol 24, 405Google Scholar
Mnookin, R and Korhauser, L, ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’ (1979) 88 Yale LRev 950Google Scholar
Mnookin, R, ‘Divorce Bargaining: The Limits on Private Ordering’ 18(4) J of L Reform 1015Google Scholar
Moglen, E, ‘Free Software Matters: Enforcing the GPL, I’ <emoglen.law.columbia.edu/publications/lu-12.pdf>>Google Scholar
Morgan, R, ‘How Hamilton’s Cast Got Broadway’s Best Deal’ Bloomberg, 28 September 2016 <www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-hamilton-broadway-profit>>Google Scholar
Morphy, H, Ancestral Connections: Art and an Aboriginal System of Knowledge (U of Chicago Press 1991)Google Scholar
Murphy, R, ‘Postscript: A Short History of British Cinema’ in Murphy, R (ed) The British Cinema Book (3rd edn, Palgrave Macmillan 2009) 417Google Scholar
Murray, LJ, Piper, S Tina and Robertson, K, Putting Intellectual Property in Its Place: Rights Discourses, Creative Labor, and the Everyday (OUP 2014)Google Scholar
Myer, R, Report of the Contemporary Visual Arts and Crafts Inquiry (2002) (‘Myer Report’)Google Scholar
Naremore, J, ‘Authorship’ in Miller, T and Stam, R (eds) A Companion to Film Theory (Blackwell Publishing 2005) 9Google Scholar
Nimmer, D, ‘Copyright in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Authorship and Originality’ (2001) 38 Houston LRev 1Google Scholar
Nimmer, MB and Nimmer, D, Nimmer on Copyright (Matthew Bender 1998, 1976, 2011 and 2016 edns)Google Scholar
Notaro, A, ‘Technology in Search of an Artist: Questions of Auteurism/Authorship and the Contemporary Cinematic Experience’ (2006) 57 The Velvet Light Trap 86Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T, ‘What is Web 2.0?’ <www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html>>Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, M, ‘The Pluralistic, Evolutionary, Quasi Legal Role of the GNU General Public Licence in Free/Libre/Open Source Software (FLOSS)’ (2004) 26(8) EIPR 340Google Scholar
Obergfell, EI, ‘No Need for Harmonising Film Copyright in Europe?’ (2003) 4 European Legal Forum 199Google Scholar
Oliar, D and Sprigman, C, ‘There’s No Free Laugh (Anymore): The Emergence of Intellectual Property Norms and the Transformation of Stand-up Comedy’ (2008) 94 Virginia LRev 1787Google Scholar
Ong, B, ‘Originality from Copying: Fitting Recreative Works into the Copyright Universe’ (2010) 2 IPQ 165Google Scholar
Oster, J, ‘Proposal for a Regulated Indigenous Art Industry’ (2006) 6(18) Indigenous LBulletin 21Google Scholar
Parker, RA and Bergman, NA, ‘Criteria for Authorship for Statisticians in Medical Papers’ (1998) 17(20) Statistics in Medicine 2289Google Scholar
Perry, M and Margoni, T, ‘Ownership in Complex Authorship: A Comparative Study of Joint Works’ (2012) 34(1) EIPR 22Google Scholar
Pettie, C, Seyd, P, Whiteley, P, Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy (CUP 2004)Google Scholar
Phillips, J, ‘Authorship, Ownership and Wikiship: Copyright in the Twenty-First Century’ (2008) 3(12) JIPLP 788Google Scholar
Phillips, R, ‘Researchers’ Objective Is to Get the Job Done’ (1997) 315 British Medical J 747Google Scholar
Phillis, M, ‘Skepticism About an Analytical Distinction between Law and Fact’ (Draft for 2011 ASLP PhD students’ workshop, 1 August 2011) available at <ssrn.com/abstract=1956324>>Google Scholar
Pila, J ‘Authorship and e-Science: Balancing Epistemological Trust and Skepticism in the Digital Environment’ (2009) 23 Social Epistemology 1Google Scholar
Pila, J ‘The “Star Wars” Copyright Claim: An Ambivalent View of the Empire’ (2012) LQR 15Google Scholar
Poll, G, ‘Harmonization of Film Copyright in Europe’ (2002) 50 J of the Copyright Society of the USA 519Google Scholar
Posner, E ‘Norms, Formalities, and the Statute of Frauds: A Comment’ (1996) 144 U Pennsylvania LRev 1971Google Scholar
Posner, E ‘The Regulation of Groups: The Influence of Legal and Nonlegal Sanctions on Collective Action’ (1996) 63 U of Chicago LRev 133Google Scholar
Posner, E ‘Introduction’ in Posner, E (ed) Social Norms, Nonlegal Sanctions, and the Law (Edward Elgar 2007)Google Scholar
Price, M and Pollack, M, ‘The Author in Copyright: Notes for the Literary Critic’ in Woodmansee, M and Jaszi, P (eds) The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature (Duke UP 1999) 439Google Scholar
Radin, MJ and Wagner, RP, ‘The Myth of Private Ordering: Rediscovering Legal Realism in Cyberspace’ (1998) 73 Chicago-Kent LRev 1295Google Scholar
Rafaeli, S and Ariel, Y, ‘Online Motivational Factors: Incentives for Participation and Contribution in Wikipedia’ in Barak, A (ed) Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Theory, Research, Applications (CUP 2008)Google Scholar
Rahmatian, A, Copyright and Creativity: The Making of Property Rights in Creative Works (Edward Elgar 2011)Google Scholar
Raustiala, K and Sprigman, C, ‘The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design’ (2006) 92 Virginia LRev 1687Google Scholar
Raymond, E, ‘The Cathedral and the Bazaar’ <www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar>>Google Scholar
Raz, J, ‘Rule of Law and Its Virtue’ in The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Clarendon Press 1979) 210Google Scholar
Reed, M, ‘Who Owns Ellen’s Oscar Selfie? Deciphering Rights of Attribution Concerning User Generated Content on Social Media’ (2015)14 John Marshall Rev of Intellectual Property L 564.Google Scholar
Reichman, JH and Franklin, JA, ‘Privately Legislated Intellectual Property Rights: Reconciling Freedom of Contract with Public Good Uses of Information’ (1999) 147(4) U of Pennsylvania LRev 875Google Scholar
Rennie, D, Yank, V and Emanuel, L, ‘When Authorship Fails: A Proposal to Make Contributors Accountable’ (1997) 278 JAMA 579Google Scholar
Reynolds, W and Moringello, J, ‘Survey of the Law of Cyberspace: Electronic Contracting Cases 2008–2009’ (2009) 65 The Business Lawyer 317, available at <ssrn.com/abstract=1437162>Google Scholar
Rheinberger, H, ‘“Discourses of Circumstance”: A Note on the Author in Science’ in Biagioli, M and Galison, P (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge 2003)Google Scholar
Richardson, W, Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms (Corwin Press 2006)Google Scholar
Ricketson, S, ‘The Concept of Originality in Anglo-Australian Copyright Law’ (1991) 9(2) Copyright Reporter 1Google Scholar
Ricketson, S ‘People or Machines? The Berne Convention and the Changing Concept of Authorship’ (1991) 16 Columbia J of L and the Arts 1Google Scholar
Ricketson, S and Ginsburg, J, International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond (2nd edn, OUP 2006)Google Scholar
Rimmer, M, ‘Australian Icons: Authenticity Marks and Identity Politics’ 2004 3 Indigenous LJ 139Google Scholar
Rimmer, M ‘The Bangarra Dance Theatre: Copyright and Indigenous Culture’ (2000) 9(2) Griffith LRev 274Google Scholar
Ritter, D, ‘Trashing Heritage: Dilemmas of Rights and Power in the Operation of Western Australia’s Heritage Legislation’ (2003) 23 Studies in Western Australian History 195Google Scholar
Rome, E, ‘Oscars: Visual Effects Artists Protest Outside Dolby Theatre’ Entertainment Weekly, 25 February 2013 <insidemovies.ew.com/2013/02/25/oscars-visual-effects-protest-life-of-pi>>Google Scholar
Rosati, E, ‘Originality in a Work, or a Work of Originality: The Effects of the Infopaq Decision’ (2011) 33(12) EIPR 746Google Scholar
Rose, M, ‘The Author as Proprietor: Donaldson v Beckett and the Genealogy of Modern Authorship’ (1988) 23 Representations 51Google Scholar
Rosen, C, “Transcendence’ is a Real Bad Flop for Johnny Depp’, The Huffington Post, 21 April 2014 <www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/21/johnny-depp-transcendence-flops_n_5184999.html>>Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, E, ‘A Theory of IP’s Negative Space’ (2011) 34(3) Columbia J of L and the Arts 317Google Scholar
Ross, M, ‘Authority and Authenticity: Scribbling Authors and the Genius of Print in Eighteenth Century England’ (1992) 10 CAELJ 495Google Scholar
Rothman, J, ‘The Questionable Use of Custom in Intellectual Property’ (2007) 93 Virginia LRev 1899Google Scholar
Rothman, J ‘Copyright, Custom and Lessons from the Common Law’ in Balganesh, S (ed) Intellectual Property and the Common Law (CUP 2013) 230Google Scholar
Sackville, R (Justice), ‘Legal Protection of Indigenous Culture in Australia’ (2003) 11(2) Cardozo J of International and Comparative L 711Google Scholar
Sagy, T, ‘What’s So Private About Private Ordering’ (2011) 45(4) Law and Society Rev 923Google Scholar
Salokannel, M, ‘Film Authorship in the Changing Audio-Visual Environment’ in Sherman, B and Strowel, A (eds), Of Authors and Origins (Clarendon Press 1994) 57Google Scholar
Sanger, L, ‘WHO SAYS WHAT WE KNOW: On the New Politics’, The Edge, <www.edge.org/3rd_culture/sanger07/sanger07_index.html>>Google Scholar
Sarris, A, ‘Notes on the Auteur Theory in 1962’ in Grant, BK (ed) Auteurs and Authorship: A Film Reader (Blackwell 2008) 35Google Scholar
Schultz, M, ‘Fear and Norms and Rock & Roll: What Jambands Can Teach Us About Persuading People to Obey Copyright Law’ (2006) 21 Berkeley Technology LJ 651Google Scholar
Schwab, J, ‘Audiovisual Works and the Work for Hire Doctrine in the Internet Age’ (2011) 35 Columbia JL & Arts 141Google Scholar
Scott, T, ‘Changing Authorship System Might be Counterproductive’ (1997) 315 British Medical J 744Google Scholar
See, H, ‘Copyright Ownership of Joint Works and Terminations of Transfers’ (1982) 30 Kansas LRev 517Google Scholar
See, H Private Power, Public Law: The Globalisation of Intellectual Property Rights (CUP 2003)Google Scholar
Sellors, P, ‘Collective Authorship in Film’ (2007) 65 J of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 263Google Scholar
Seymore, S, ‘How Does My Work Become Our Work? Dilution of Authorship in Scientific Papers, and the Need for the Academy to Obey Copyright Law’ (2006) 12 Richmond J of L & Tech 11Google Scholar
Shapin, S and Schaffer, S, Leviathan and The Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and The Experimental Life (Princeton UP 1985)Google Scholar
Shapin, S A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago UP 1994)Google Scholar
Shapin, S ‘How to be Antiscientific’ in Labinger, JA and Collins, H (eds), The One Culture? A Conversation about Science (Chicago UP 2001)Google Scholar
Schultz, M, ‘Fear and Norms and Rock & Roll: What Jambands Can Teach Us about Persuading People to Obey Copyright Law’ (2009) Berkeley Technology LJ 651Google Scholar
Silbey, J, The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators, and Everyday Intellectual Property (Stanford Press 2014)Google Scholar
Simone, D, ‘Recalibrating the Joint Authorship Test: Insights from Scientific Collaborations’ (2013) 26(1) IPJ 111Google Scholar
Simone, D ‘Copyright or Copyleft?: Wikipedia as a Turning Point for Authorship’ (2014) 25(1) Kings LJ 102Google Scholar
Sismondo, S, ‘Ghosts in the Machine: Publication Planning in the Medical Sciences’ (2009) 39 Social Studies of Science 171Google Scholar
Smith, H, ‘Community and Custom in Property’ (2009) 10(1) Theoretical Inquiries in L 5Google Scholar
Sofer, A, ‘Joint Authorship: An Uncomfortable Fit with Tenancy in Common’ (1998) 19 Loyola LA Entertainment LJ 1Google Scholar
Stamatoudi, I, ‘Moral Rights of Authors in England: The Missing Emphasis on the Role of Creators’ (1997) 4 IPQ 478Google Scholar
Stamatoudi, I ‘“Joy” for the Claimant: Can a Film Also Be Protected as a Dramatic Work’ (2000) 1 IPQ 117Google Scholar
Steinberg, NS, ‘Regulation of Scientific Misconduct in Federally Funded Research’ (2000) 10 South California Interdisciplinary LJ 39Google Scholar
Stern, S and Lemmens, T, ‘Legal Remedies for Medical Ghostwriting: Imposing Fraud Liability on Guest Authors of Ghostwritten Articles’ (2011) 8(8) PLoS Med e1001070Google Scholar
Stokes, A, ‘Authorship, Collaboration and Copyright: A View from the United Kingdom’ (2002) Entertainment LRev 121Google Scholar
Strandburg, K, ‘User Innovator Community Norms: At the Boundary between Academic and Industry Research’ (2009) 77 Fordham LRev 101Google Scholar
Tankebe, J, ‘Viewing Things Differently: The Dimensions of Public Perceptions of Police Legitimacy’ (2013) 51 Criminology 103Google Scholar
Tapscott, D and Williams, A, Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything (Atlantic Books 2008)Google Scholar
Targosz, T, ‘Authorship by Deletion’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, <kluwercopyrightblog.com/2011/11/02/authorship-by-deletion-supreme-court-june-22–2010-ii-csk-52710>>Google Scholar
Tehranian, J, ‘Infringement Nation: Copyright Reform and the Law/Norm Gap’ (2007) Utah LRev 537Google Scholar
Tehranian, J ‘Sex, Drones & Videotape: Rethinking Copyright’s Authorship-Fixation Conflation in the Age of Performance’ (2017) 68 Hastings LJ 1319Google Scholar
Tehranian, J ‘Copyright’s Male Gaze: Authorship and Inequality in a Panoptic World’ (2018) 41(2) Harvard J of L and Gender 343Google Scholar
Terrall, M, ‘The Uses of Anonymity in the Age of Reason’ in Biagioli, M and Galison, P (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge 2003)Google Scholar
Thompson, MP, ‘Beneficial Joint Tenancies: A Case for Abolition?’ (1987) Jan/Feb Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 29Google Scholar
Todd, A, ‘Painting a Moving Train: Adding “Postmodern” to the Taxonomy of Law’ (2008) 40(1) U of Toledo LRev 105.Google Scholar
Truffaut, F, ‘A Certain Tendency of the French Cinema’ (1954) 31 Cahiers du Cinéma translated and reproduced in Grant, BK, Auteurs and Authorship: A Film Reader (Blackwell 2008) 9Google Scholar
Tyler, T, ‘Compliance with Intellectual Property Law: A Psychological Perspective’ (1996) 29 International L and Politics 219Google Scholar
Tyler, T and Jackson, J, ‘Popular Legitimacy and the Exercise of Legal Authority: Motivating Compliance, Cooperation and Engagement’ (2014) 20(1) Psychology Public Policy and L 78Google Scholar
Vaidhyanathan, S, Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity (NYU Press 2001)Google Scholar
Valiela, I, Doing Science: Design, Analysis, and Communication of Scientific Research (OUP 2001)Google Scholar
van Eechoud, M, ‘Along the Road to Uniformity – Diverse Readings of the Court of Justice’s Judgments on Copyright Work’ (2012) 1 JIPITEC 60Google Scholar
Vaver, D Intellectual Property: Copyright, Patents and Trade-Marks (2nd edn, Irwin Law 2011)Google Scholar
Vaver, D ‘Venturing into Intellectual Property Jointly and Confidentially’ (2012) 25(1) IPJ 11,Google Scholar
Versteeg, R, ‘Defining “Author” for Purposes of Copyright’ (1996) 45 American U LRev 1323Google Scholar
Vesterman, W, ‘The Death of the Scientific Author: Multiple Authorship in Scientific Papers’ (2002) 8 Common Knowledge 439Google Scholar
Wacha, J, ‘Taking the Case: Is the GPL Enforceable?’ (2005) 21 Santa Clara Computer & High-Technology LJ 451Google Scholar
Waelde, C, ‘What Is Beyond the Score?’ in Rahmatian, A (ed) Concepts of Music and Copyright: How Music Perceives Itself and How Copyright Perceives Music (Edward Elgar 2015) 23Google Scholar
Walker, RK and Depoorter, B, ‘Unavoidable Aesthetic Judgments in Copyright Law: A Community of Practice Standard’ (2015) 109 (2) Northwestern U LRev 343.Google Scholar
Walshok, M, Knowledge without Boundaries: What America’s Research Universities Can Do for the Economy, the Workplace, and the Community (Jossey-Bass 1995)Google Scholar
Wartenberg, T, ‘Philosophy of Film’ in Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2014) <plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/film>>Google Scholar
Warwick, A, ‘“A Very Hard Nut to Crack” or Making Sense of Maxwell’s Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism in Mid-Victorian Cambridge’ in Biagioli, M and Galison, P (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge 2003) 133Google Scholar
Watson, P, ‘Cinematic Authorship and the Film Auteur’ in Nelmes, J (ed) Introduction to Film Studies (5th edn, Routledge 2012) 142Google Scholar
Weatherall, K, ‘Culture, Autonomy and Djulibinyamurr: Individual and Community in the Construction of Rights to Traditional Designs’ (2001) 64 MLR 215Google Scholar
Weinburg, AM, ‘Impact of Large-Scale Science on the United States’ (1961) 134(3473) Science 161Google Scholar
Wendland, W, ‘Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore: WIPO’s Exploratory Program – Part 1’ (2002) International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition L 485Google Scholar
Wiseman, L, ‘The Protection of Indigenous Art and Culture in Australia: The Labels of Authenticity’ (2001) EIPR 14Google Scholar
Woodmansee, M, ‘The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the “Author”’ (1983–1984) 17 Eighteenth Century Studies 425Google Scholar
Woodmansee, M ‘On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity’ in Woodmansee, M and Jaszi, P (eds) The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriate in Law and Literature (Duke U Press 1999) 15Google Scholar
Woodmansee, M and Jaszi, P (eds) The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature (Duke UP 1999)Google Scholar
Zemer, L, ‘Contribution and Collaborations in Joint Authorship: Too Many Misconceptions’ (2006) 1(4) JIPLP 283Google Scholar
Zemer, L ‘Is Intention to Co-author an Uncertain Realm of Policy?’ (2007) 30(4) Columbia J of L and the Arts 611Google Scholar
Ziman, J, Of One Mind: The Collectivisation of Science (American Institute of Physics Press 1995)Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D, ‘Copyright as Incentives: Did We Just Imagine That?’ (2011) 12(1) Theoretical Inquiries in L 29Google Scholar